QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Stronach, B. E. Articles by Beckerle, M. C. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Stronach, B. E. Articles by Beckerle, M. C.

Vol. 10, Issue 7, 2329-2342, July 1999

Muscle LIM Proteins Are Associated with Muscle Sarcomeres and Require dMEF2 for Their Expression during Drosophila Myogenesis

Beth E. Stronach,^* Patricia J. Renfranz, Brenda Lilly, and Mary C. Beckerle

Department of Biology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah 84112

A genetic hierarchy of interactions, involving myogenic regulatory factors of the MyoD and myocyte enhancer-binding 2 (MEF2) families, serves to elaborate and maintain the differentiated muscle phenotype through transcriptional regulation of muscle-specific target genes. Much work suggests that members of the cysteine-rich protein (CRP) family of LIM domain proteins also play a role in muscle differentiation; however, the specific functions of CRPs in this process remain undefined. Previously, we characterized two members of the Drosophila CRP family, the muscle LIM proteins Mlp60A and Mlp84B, which show restricted expression in differentiating muscle lineages. To extend our analysis of Drosophila Mlps, we characterized the expression of Mlps in mutant backgrounds that disrupt specific aspects of muscle development. We show a genetic requirement for the transcription factor dMEF2 in regulating Mlp expression and an ability of dMEF2 to bind, in vitro, to consensus MEF2 sites derived from those present in Mlp genomic sequences. These data suggest that the Mlp genes may be direct targets of dMEF2 within the genetic hierarchy controlling muscle differentiation. Mutations that disrupt myoblast fusion fail to affect Mlp expression. In later stages of myogenic differentiation, which are dedicated primarily to assembly of the contractile apparatus, we analyzed the subcellular distribution of Mlp84B in detail. Immunofluorescent studies revealed the localization of Mlp84B to muscle attachment sites and the periphery of Z-bands of striated muscle. Analysis of mutations that affect expression of integrins and -actinin, key components of these structures, also failed to perturb Mlp84B distribution. In conclusion, we have used molecular epistasis analysis to position Mlp function downstream of events involving mesoderm specification and patterning and concomitant with terminal muscle differentiation. Furthermore, our results are consistent with a structural role for Mlps as components of muscle cytoarchitecture.

---

^*   Present address: Department of Genetics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115.
   Corresponding author. E-mail address: Beckerle{at}bioscience.utah.edu.

---

Molecular Biology of the Cell
Vol. 10, 2329-2342, July 1999
Copyright © 1999 by The American Society for Cell Biology

This article has been cited by other articles:

				S. J. Elgar, J. Han, and M. V. Taylor mef2 activity levels differentially affect gene expression during Drosophila muscle development PNAS, January 22, 2008; 105(3): 918 - 923. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Mery, O. Taghli-Lamallem, K. A. Clark, M. C. Beckerle, X. Wu, K. Ocorr, and R. Bodmer The Drosophila muscle LIM protein, Mlp84B, is essential for cardiac function J. Exp. Biol., January 1, 2008; 211(1): 15 - 23. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. A. Clark, J. M. Bland, and M. C. Beckerle The Drosophila muscle LIM protein, Mlp84B, cooperates with D-titin to maintain muscle structural integrity J. Cell Sci., June 15, 2007; 120(12): 2066 - 2077. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. S. Montana and J. T. Littleton Expression Profiling of a Hypercontraction-induced Myopathy in Drosophila Suggests a Compensatory Cytoskeletal Remodeling Response J. Biol. Chem., March 24, 2006; 281(12): 8100 - 8109. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. W. Baker, K. K. K. Tanaka, N. Klitgord, and R. M. Cripps Adult Myogenesis in Drosophila melanogaster Can Proceed Independently of Myocyte Enhancer Factor-2 Genetics, August 1, 2005; 170(4): 1747 - 1759. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. Weber, N. Johnson, D. Champlin, and A. Patty Many P-Element Insertions Affect Wing Shape in Drosophila melanogaster Genetics, March 1, 2005; 169(3): 1461 - 1475. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M.-C. Marin, J.-R. Rodriguez, and A. Ferrus Transcription of Drosophila Troponin I Gene Is Regulated by Two Conserved, Functionally Identical, Synergistic Elements Mol. Biol. Cell, March 1, 2004; 15(3): 1185 - 1196. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. Briere, A.-C. Bordel, H. Barthou, A. Jauneau, A. Steinmetz, G. Alibert, and M. Petitprez Is the LIM-domain Protein HaWLIM1 Associated with Cortical Microtubules in Sunflower Protoplasts? Plant Cell Physiol., October 15, 2003; 44(10): 1055 - 1063. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. A. Dworak, M. A. Charles, L. B. Pellerano, and H. Sink Characterization of Drosophila hibris, a gene related to human nephrin Development, November 1, 2001; 128(21): 4265 - 4276. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. A. Bour, M. Chakravarti, J. M. West, and S. M. Abmayr Drosophila SNS, a member of the immunoglobulin superfamily that is essential for myoblast fusion Genes & Dev., June 15, 2000; 14(12): 1498 - 1511. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				M. Flick and S. Konieczny The muscle regulatory and structural protein MLP is a cytoskeletal binding partner of betaI-spectrin J. Cell Sci., January 5, 2000; 113(9): 1553 - 1564. [Abstract] [PDF]