|
|
|
|
Vol. 14, Issue 10, 3989-4002, October 2003
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||




* Department of Biochemistry, Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Clear Water Bay, Hong Kong;
Division of Life Science, Graduate School of Natural Science and Technology, Kanazawa University, Kakuma-machi, Kanazawa 920-1192, Japan
Submitted March 23, 2003;
Revised June 13, 2003;
Accepted June 17, 2003
Monitoring Editor: Douglas Koshland
Cell cycle checkpoints that monitor DNA damage and spindle assembly are essential for the maintenance of genetic integrity, and drugs that target these checkpoints are important chemotherapeutic agents. We have examined how cells respond to DNA damage while the spindle-assembly checkpoint is activated. Single cell electrophoresis and phosphorylation of histone H2AX indicated that several chemotherapeutic agents could induce DNA damage during mitotic block. DNA damage during mitotic block triggered CDC2 inactivation, histone H3 dephosphorylation, and chromosome decondensation. Cells did not progress into G1 but seemed to retract to a G2-like state containing 4N DNA content, with stabilized cyclin A and cyclin B1 binding to Thr14/Tyr15-phosphorylated CDC2. The loss of mitotic cells was not due to cell death because there was no discernible effect on caspase-3 activation, DNA fragmentation, or viability. Extensive DNA damage during mitotic block inactivated cyclin B1-CDC2 and prevented G1 entry when the block was removed. The mitotic DNA damage responses were independent of p53 and pRb, but they were dependent on ATM. CDC25A that accumulated during mitosis was rapidly destroyed after DNA damage in an ATM-dependent manner. Ectopic expression of CDC25A or nonphosphorylatable CDC2 effectively inhibited the dephosphorylation of histone H3 after DNA damage. Hence, although spindle disruption and DNA damage provide conflicting signals to regulate CDC2, the negative regulation by the DNA damage checkpoint could overcome the positive regulation by the spindle-assembly checkpoint.
Abbreviations used: ADR, adriamycin; AT, ataxia-telangiectasia; CMP, camptothecin; CIS, cisplatin; ETP, etoposide; NOC, nocodazole; Topo, topoisomerase.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Corresponding author. E-mail address: bcrandy{at}ust.hk.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
R. W. Anantha, E. Sokolova, and J. A. Borowiec RPA phosphorylation facilitates mitotic exit in response to mitotic DNA damage PNAS, September 2, 2008; 105(35): 12903 - 12908. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. K. Fung, H. T. Ma, and R. Y.C. Poon Specialized Roles of the Two Mitotic Cyclins in Somatic Cells: Cyclin A as an Activator of M Phase-promoting Factor Mol. Biol. Cell, May 1, 2007; 18(5): 1861 - 1873. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y.-J. Jang, J.-H. Ji, Y.-C. Choi, C. J. Ryu, and S.-Y. Ko Regulation of Polo-like Kinase 1 by DNA Damage in Mitosis: INHIBITION OF MITOTIC PLK-1 BY PROTEIN PHOSPHATASE 2A J. Biol. Chem., January 26, 2007; 282(4): 2473 - 2482. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Bozko, M. Sabisz, A. K. Larsen, and A. Skladanowski Cross-talk between DNA damage and cell survival checkpoints during G2 and mitosis: pharmacologic implications Mol. Cancer Ther., December 1, 2005; 4(12): 2016 - 2025. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. M. Scaife Selective and irreversible cell cycle inhibition by diphenyleneiodonium Mol. Cancer Ther., June 1, 2005; 4(6): 876 - 884. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. W. Cheung, D.-Y. Jin, M.-t. Ling, Y. C. Wong, Q. Wang, S. W. Tsao, and X. Wang Mitotic Arrest Deficient 2 Expression Induces Chemosensitization to a DNA-Damaging Agent, Cisplatin, in Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Cells Cancer Res., February 15, 2005; 65(4): 1450 - 1458. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A.-C. Goulet, M. Chigbrow, P. Frisk, and M. A. Nelson Selenomethionine induces sustained ERK phosphorylation leading to cell-cycle arrest in human colon cancer cells Carcinogenesis, January 1, 2005; 26(1): 109 - 117. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Bayart, O. Grigorieva, S. Leibovitch, R. Onclercq-Delic, and M. Amor-Gueret A Major Role for Mitotic cdc2 Kinase Inactivation in the Establishment of the Mitotic DNA Damage Checkpoint Cancer Res., December 15, 2004; 64(24): 8954 - 8959. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J.-H. Yuan, Y. Feng, R. H. Fisher, S. Maloid, D. L. Longo, and D. K. Ferris Polo-Like Kinase 1 Inactivation Following Mitotic DNA Damaging Treatments Is Independent of Ataxia Telangiectasia Mutated Kinase Mol. Cancer Res., July 1, 2004; 2(7): 417 - 426. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Uchida, A. Kuma, M. Ohtsubo, M. Shimura, M. Hirata, H. Nakagama, T. Matsunaga, Y. Ishizaka, and K. Yamashita Binding of 14-3-3{beta} but not 14-3-3{sigma} controls the cytoplasmic localization of CDC25B: binding site preferences of 14-3-3 subtypes and the subcellular localization of CDC25B J. Cell Sci., June 15, 2004; 117(14): 3011 - 3020. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||