![]() |
|
|
Vol. 14, Issue 12, 5019-5027, December 2003
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||



* Department of Biochemistry, University of Groningen, Nijenborgh 4, 9747 AG Groningen, the Netherlands;
Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Department of Plant Sciences, Wageningen University, 6703 HA Wageningen, The Netherlands; and
¶ MicroSpectroscopy Centre, Laboratory of Biochemistry, Wageningen University, The Netherlands
Submitted May 22, 2003;
Revised September 23, 2003;
Accepted October 9, 2003
Monitoring Editor: Paul Matsudiara
The chemoattractant cAMP induces the translocation of cytosolic PHCrac-GFP to the plasma membrane. PHCrac-GFP is a green fluorescent protein fused to a PH domain that presumably binds to phosphatydylinositol polyphosphates in the membrane. We determined the relative concentration of PHCrac-GFP in the cytosol and at different places along the cell boundary. In cells stimulated homogeneously with 1µM cAMP we observed two distinct phases of PHCrac-GFP translocation. The first translocation is transient and occurs to nearly the entire boundary of the cell; the response is maximal at 6-8 s after stimulation and disappears after
20 s. A second translocation of PHCrac-GFP starts after
30 s and persists as long as cAMP remains present. Translocation during this second response occurs to small patches with radius of
4-5 µm, each covering
10% of the cell surface. Membrane patches of PHCrac-GFP are both temporally and spatially closely associated with pseudopodia, which are extended at
10 s from the area with a PHCrac-GFP patch. These signaling patches in pseudopodia of homogeneously stimulated cells resemble the single patch of PHCrac-GFP at the leading edge of a cell in a gradient of cAMP, suggesting that PHCrac-GFP is a spatial cue for pseudopod formation also in uniform cAMP.
Present address: Department of Cell Biology, Harvard Medical School, 240 Longwood Avenue, Boston, MA 02115-5730
Present address: Section of Molecular Cytology, Swammerdam Institute for Life Sciences, University of Amsterdam, Kruislaan 316, 1098 SM Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
|| Corresponding author. E-mail address: P.J.M.van.Haastert{at}chem.rug.nl.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
C. Frantz, G. Barreiro, L. Dominguez, X. Chen, R. Eddy, J. Condeelis, M. J.S. Kelly, M. P. Jacobson, and D. L. Barber Cofilin is a pH sensor for actin free barbed end formation: role of phosphoinositide binding J. Cell Biol., December 1, 2008; 183(5): 865 - 879. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Kortholt, J. S. King, I. Keizer-Gunnink, A. J. Harwood, and P. J.M. Van Haastert Phospholipase C Regulation of Phosphatidylinositol 3,4,5-trisphosphate-mediated Chemotaxis Mol. Biol. Cell, December 1, 2007; 18(12): 4772 - 4779. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Wessels, D. F. Lusche, S. Kuhl, P. Heid, and D. R. Soll PTEN plays a role in the suppression of lateral pseudopod formation during Dictyostelium motility and chemotaxis J. Cell Sci., August 1, 2007; 120(15): 2517 - 2531. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. J. M. Van Haastert and D. M. Veltman Chemotaxis: Navigating by Multiple Signaling Pathways Sci. Signal., July 24, 2007; 2007(396): pe40 - pe40. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. de Candia, A. Gamba, F. Cavalli, A. Coniglio, S. Di Talia, F. Bussolino, and G. Serini A Simulation Environment for Directional Sensing as a Phase Separation Process Sci. Signal., March 20, 2007; 2007(378): pl1 - pl1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Levine, D. A. Kessler, and W.-J. Rappel Directional sensing in eukaryotic chemotaxis: A balanced inactivation model PNAS, June 27, 2006; 103(26): 9761 - 9766. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. M. Loovers, M. Postma, I. Keizer-Gunnink, Y. E. Huang, P. N. Devreotes, and P. J.M. van Haastert Distinct Roles of PI(3,4,5)P3 during Chemoattractant Signaling in Dictyostelium: A Quantitative In Vivo Analysis by Inhibition of PI3-Kinase Mol. Biol. Cell, April 1, 2006; 17(4): 1503 - 1513. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Gamba, A. de Candia, S. Di Talia, A. Coniglio, F. Bussolino, and G. Serini Diffusion-limited phase separation in eukaryotic chemotaxis PNAS, November 22, 2005; 102(47): 16927 - 16932. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. C. Knol, R. Engel, M. Blaauw, A. J. W. G. Visser, and P. J. M. van Haastert The Phosducin-Like Protein PhLP1 Is Essential for G{beta}{gamma} Dimer Formation in Dictyostelium discoideum Mol. Cell. Biol., September 15, 2005; 25(18): 8393 - 8400. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Patel and D. L. Barber A developmentally regulated Na-H exchanger in Dictyostelium discoideum is necessary for cell polarity during chemotaxis J. Cell Biol., April 25, 2005; 169(2): 321 - 329. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
X. Xu, M. Meier-Schellersheim, X. Jiao, L. E. Nelson, and T. Jin Quantitative Imaging of Single Live Cells Reveals Spatiotemporal Dynamics of Multistep Signaling Events of Chemoattractant Gradient Sensing in Dictyostelium Mol. Biol. Cell, February 1, 2005; 16(2): 676 - 688. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. M. Veltman, J. Roelofs, R. Engel, A. J.W.G. Visser, and P. J.M. Van Haastert Activation of Soluble Guanylyl Cyclase at the Leading Edge during Dictyostelium Chemotaxis Mol. Biol. Cell, February 1, 2005; 16(2): 976 - 983. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Franca-Koh and P. N. Devreotes Moving Forward: Mechanisms of Chemoattractant Gradient Sensing Physiology, October 1, 2004; 19(5): 300 - 308. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Postma, J. Roelofs, J. Goedhart, H. M. Loovers, A. J. W. G. Visser, and P. J. M. Van Haastert Sensitization of Dictyostelium chemotaxis by phosphoinositide-3-kinase-mediated self-organizing signalling patches J. Cell Sci., June 15, 2004; 117(14): 2925 - 2935. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||