|
|
|
|
Vol. 15, Issue 2, 761-773, February 2004
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||

Department of Cell and Developmental Biology, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599-7090
Submitted March 13, 2003;
Revised September 19, 2003;
Accepted October 6, 2003
Monitoring Editor: Pamela Silver
Hsp40 family members regulate Hsp70s ability to bind nonnative polypeptides and thereby play an essential role in cell physiology. Type I and type II Hsp40s, such as yeast Ydj1 and Sis1, form chaperone pairs with cytosolic Hsp70 Ssa1 that fold proteins with different efficiencies and carry out specific cellular functions. The mechanism by which Ydj1 and Sis1 specify Hsp70 functions is not clear. Ydj1 and Sis1 share a high degree of sequence identity in their amino and carboxyl terminal ends, but each contains a structurally unique and centrally located protein module that is implicated in chaperone function. To test whether the chaperone modules of Ydj1 and Sis1 function in the specification of Hsp70 action, we constructed a set of chimeric Hsp40s in which the chaperone domains of Ydj1 and Sis1 were swapped to form YSY and SYS. Purified SYS and YSY exhibited protein-folding activity and substrate specificity that mimicked that of Ydj1 and Sis1, respectively. In in vivo studies, YSY exhibited a gain of function and, unlike Ydj1, could complement the lethal phenotype of sis1
and facilitate maintenance of the prion [RNQ+]. Ydj1 and Sis1 contain exchangeable chaperone modules that assist in specification of Hsp70 function.
* These authors contributed equally to this work.
Corresponding author. E-mail address: dmcyr{at}med.unc.edu.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. K. Mandal, N. B. Nillegoda, J. A. Chen, and A. J. Caplan Ydj1 Protects Nascent Protein Kinases from Degradation and Controls the Rate of Their Maturation Mol. Cell. Biol., July 1, 2008; 28(13): 4434 - 4444. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. M. Douglas, S. Treusch, H.-Y. Ren, R. Halfmann, M. L. Duennwald, S. Lindquist, and D. M. Cyr Chaperone-dependent amyloid assembly protects cells from prion toxicity PNAS, May 20, 2008; 105(20): 7206 - 7211. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. K. Bhangoo, S. Tzankov, A. C.Y. Fan, K. Dejgaard, D. Y. Thomas, and J. C. Young Multiple 40-kDa Heat-Shock Protein Chaperones Function in Tom70-dependent Mitochondrial Import Mol. Biol. Cell, September 1, 2007; 18(9): 3414 - 3428. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. S. Cintron and D. Toft Defining the Requirements for Hsp40 and Hsp70 in the Hsp90 Chaperone Pathway J. Biol. Chem., September 8, 2006; 281(36): 26235 - 26244. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Hennessy, W. S. Nicoll, R. Zimmermann, M. E. Cheetham, and G. L. Blatch Not all J domains are created equal: Implications for the specificity of Hsp40-Hsp70 interactions Protein Sci., July 1, 2005; 14(7): 1697 - 1709. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. C. Borges, H. Fischer, A. F. Craievich, and C. H. I. Ramos Low Resolution Structural Study of Two Human HSP40 Chaperones in Solution: DJA1 FROM SUBFAMILY A AND DJB4 FROM SUBFAMILY B HAVE DIFFERENT QUATERNARY STRUCTURES J. Biol. Chem., April 8, 2005; 280(14): 13671 - 13681. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Aron, N. Lopez, W. Walter, E. A. Craig, and J. Johnson In Vivo Bipartite Interaction Between the Hsp40 Sis1 and Hsp70 in Saccharomyces cerevisiae Genetics, April 1, 2005; 169(4): 1873 - 1882. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C.-Y. Fan, H.-Y. Ren, P. Lee, A. J. Caplan, and D. M. Cyr The Type I Hsp40 Zinc Finger-like Region Is Required for Hsp70 to Capture Non-native Polypeptides from Ydj1 J. Biol. Chem., January 7, 2005; 280(1): 695 - 702. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||