![]() |
|
|
Vol. 15, Issue 4, 1568-1579, April 2004
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||



**
* Unidad de Investigación, Hospital Universitario de Canarias, Ofra s/n, La Cuesta, 38320 Tenerife, Spain;
Centro de Investigación del Cáncer, CSIC/University of Salamanca, Campus Unamuno, 37007 Salamanca, Spain;
Department of Biology, York University, Downsview, Ontario, M3J 1P3 Canada;
¶ Biocenter Oulu and Department of Biochemistry, University of Oulu, FIN-90014 Finland;
|| Division of Molecular Genetics, Department of Biochemistry, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX1 3QU, United Kingdom; and
# Department of Biology, University of Joensuu, FIN-80101 Joensuu, Finland
Submitted June 27, 2003;
Revised December 15, 2003;
Accepted December 15, 2003
Monitoring Editor: Mark Solomon
Mammalian TopBP1 is a BRCT domaincontaining protein whose function in mitotic cells is linked to replication and DNA damage checkpoint. Here, we study its possible role during meiosis in mice. TopBP1 foci are abundant during early prophase I and localize mainly to histone
-H2AXpositive domains, where DNA doublestrand breaks (required to initiate recombination) occur. Strikingly, TopBP1 showed a pattern almost identical to that of ATR, a PI3K-like kinase involved in mitotic DNA damage checkpoint. In the synapsis-defective Fkbp6-/- mouse, TopBP1 heavily stains unsynapsed regions of chromosomes. We also tested whether Schizosaccharomyces pombe Cut5 (the TopBP1 homologue) plays a role in the meiotic recombination checkpoint, like spRad3, the ATR homologue. Indeed, we found that a cut5 mutation suppresses the checkpoint-dependent meiotic delay of a meiotic recombination defective mutant, indicating a direct role of the Cut5 protein in the meiotic checkpoint. Our findings suggest that ATR and TopBP1 monitor meiotic recombination and are required for activation of the meiotic recombination checkpoint.
Article published online ahead of print. Mol. Biol. Cell 10.1091/mbc.E03060444. Article and publication date are available at www.molbiolcell.org/cgi/doi/10.1091/mbc.E03-06-0444.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
** Corresponding authors. E-mail addresses: pedross{at}usal.es and rfreire{at}hecit.es.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. K. Mahadevaiah, D. Bourc'his, D. G. de Rooij, T. H. Bestor, J. M.A. Turner, and P. S. Burgoyne Extensive meiotic asynapsis in mice antagonises meiotic silencing of unsynapsed chromatin and consequently disrupts meiotic sex chromosome inactivation J. Cell Biol., July 28, 2008; 182(2): 263 - 276. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Venere, A. Snyder, O. Zgheib, and T. D. Halazonetis Phosphorylation of ATR-Interacting Protein on Ser239 Mediates an Interaction with Breast-Ovarian Cancer Susceptibility 1 and Checkpoint Function Cancer Res., July 1, 2007; 67(13): 6100 - 6105. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. B. Moens, E. Marcon, J. S. Shore, N. Kochakpour, and B. Spyropoulos Initiation and resolution of interhomolog connections: crossover and non-crossover sites along mouse synaptonemal complexes J. Cell Sci., March 15, 2007; 120(6): 1017 - 1027. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Taricani and T. S.F. Wang Rad4TopBP1, a Scaffold Protein, Plays Separate Roles in DNA Damage and Replication Checkpoints and DNA Replication Mol. Biol. Cell, August 1, 2006; 17(8): 3456 - 3468. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Barchi, S. Mahadevaiah, M. Di Giacomo, F. Baudat, D. G. de Rooij, P. S. Burgoyne, M. Jasin, and S. Keeney Surveillance of Different Recombination Defects in Mouse Spermatocytes Yields Distinct Responses despite Elimination at an Identical Developmental Stage Mol. Cell. Biol., August 15, 2005; 25(16): 7203 - 7215. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I Roig, P Robles, R Garcia, I Martinez-Flores, L. Cabero, J Egozcue, B Liebe, H Scherthan, and M Garcia Chromosome 18 pairing behavior in human trisomic oocytes. Presence of an extra chromosome extends bouquet stage Reproduction, May 1, 2005; 129(5): 565 - 575. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. G. Pankratz and S. L. Forsburg Meiotic S-Phase Damage Activates Recombination without Checkpoint Arrest Mol. Biol. Cell, April 1, 2005; 16(4): 1651 - 1660. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Di Giacomo, M. Barchi, F. Baudat, W. Edelmann, S. Keeney, and M. Jasin Distinct DNA-damage-dependent and -independent responses drive the loss of oocytes in recombination-defective mouse mutants PNAS, January 18, 2005; 102(3): 737 - 742. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||