|
|
|
|
Vol. 15, Issue 6, 2537-2548, June 2004
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||




* Department of Biophysics, Graduate School of Science, Kyoto University, Kyoto 606-8502, Japan;
PRESTO, Japan Science and Technology Corporation, Saitama 332-0012, Japan; and
Department of Life Sciences, Graduate School of Arts and Sciences, University of Tokyo, Tokyo 153-8902, Japan
Submitted September 25, 2003;
Revised February 14, 2004;
Accepted February 14, 2004
Monitoring Editor: Pamela Silver
Newly synthesized secretory and transmembrane proteins are folded and assembled in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) where an efficient quality control system operates so that only correctly folded molecules are allowed to move along the secretory pathway. The productive folding process in the ER has been thought to be supported by the unfolded protein response (UPR), which is activated by the accumulation of unfolded proteins in the ER. However, a dilemma has emerged; activation of ATF6, a key regulator of mammalian UPR, requires intracellular transport from the ER to the Golgi apparatus. This suggests that unfolded proteins might be leaked from the ER together with ATF6 in response to ER stress, exhibiting proteotoxicity in the secretory pathway. We show here that ATF6 and correctly folded proteins are transported to the Golgi apparatus via the same route and by the same mechanism under conditions of ER stress, whereas unfolded proteins are retained in the ER. Thus, activation of the UPR is compatible with the quality control in the ER and the ER possesses a remarkable ability to select proteins to be transported in mammalian cells in marked contrast to yeast cells, which actively utilize intracellular traffic to deal with unfolded proteins accumulated in the ER.
Corresponding author. E-mail address: kazu.mori{at}bio.mbox.media.kyoto-u.ac.jp.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
R. Bartoszewski, A. Rab, G. Twitty, L. Stevenson, J. Fortenberry, A. Piotrowski, J. P. Dumanski, and Z. Bebok The Mechanism of Cystic Fibrosis Transmembrane Conductance Regulator Transcriptional Repression during the Unfolded Protein Response J. Biol. Chem., May 2, 2008; 283(18): 12154 - 12165. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Lai, T. Teodoro, and A. Volchuk Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress: Signaling the Unfolded Protein Response Physiology, June 1, 2007; 22(3): 193 - 201. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Nadanaka, T. Okada, H. Yoshida, and K. Mori Role of Disulfide Bridges Formed in the Luminal Domain of ATF6 in Sensing Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress Mol. Cell. Biol., February 1, 2007; 27(3): 1027 - 1043. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Rab, R. Bartoszewski, A. Jurkuvenaite, J. Wakefield, J. F. Collawn, and Z. Bebok Endoplasmic reticulum stress and the unfolded protein response regulate genomic cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator expression Am J Physiol Cell Physiol, February 1, 2007; 292(2): C756 - C766. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. H.-F. Yam, K. Gaplovska-Kysela, C. Zuber, and J. Roth Aggregated Myocilin Induces Russell Bodies and Causes Apoptosis: Implications for the Pathogenesis of Myocilin-Caused Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma Am. J. Pathol., January 1, 2007; 170(1): 100 - 109. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Mukhopadhyay and P. B. Sehgal Discordant regulatory changes in monocrotaline-induced megalocytosis of lung arterial endothelial and alveolar epithelial cells Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol, June 1, 2006; 290(6): L1216 - L1226. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. Nagamori, N. Yabuta, T. Fujii, H. Tanaka, K. Yomogida, Y. Nishimune, and H. Nojima Tisp40, a spermatid specific bZip transcription factor, functions by binding to the unfolded protein response element via the Rip pathway Genes Cells, June 1, 2005; 10(6): 575 - 594. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Yamamoto, H. Yoshida, K. Kokame, R. J. Kaufman, and K. Mori Differential Contributions of ATF6 and XBP1 to the Activation of Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress-Responsive cis-Acting Elements ERSE, UPRE and ERSE-II J. Biochem., September 1, 2004; 136(3): 343 - 350. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||