QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

Vol. 15, Issue 9, 4191-4202, September 2004

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Supplemental Tables All Versions of this Article: E04-05-0412v1 15/9/4191    most recent Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Green, S. R. Articles by Johnson, A. D. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Green, S. R. Articles by Johnson, A. D.

Promoter-dependent Roles for the Srb10 Cyclin-dependent Kinase and the Hda1 Deacetylase in Tup1-mediated Repression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Sarah R. Green ^*, and Alexander D. Johnson ^*  

^* Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94143; Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94143

Submitted May 18, 2004; Revised June 15, 2004; Accepted June 22, 2004
Monitoring Editor: David Botstein

The Tup1-Ssn6 complex has been well characterized as a Saccharomyces cerevisiae general transcriptional repressor with functionally conserved homologues in metazoans. These homologues are essential for cell differentiation and many other developmental processes. The mechanism of repression of all of these proteins remains poorly understood. Srb10 (a cyclin-dependent kinase associated with the Mediator complex) and Hda1 (a class I histone deacetylase) have each been implicated in Tup1-mediated repression. We present a statistically based genome-wide analysis that reveals that Hda1 partially represses roughly 30% of Tup1-repressed genes, whereas Srb10 kinase activity contributes to the repression of 15% of Tup1-repressed genes. These effects only partially overlap, suggesting that different Tup1-repression mechanisms predominate at different promoters. We also demonstrate a distinction between histone deacetylation and transcriptional repression. In an HDA1 deletion, many Tup1-repressed genes are hyperacetylated at lysine 18 of histone H3, yet are not derepressed, indicating deacetylation alone is not sufficient to repress most Tup1-controlled genes. In a strain lacking both Srb10 and Hda1 functions, more than half of the Tup1-repressed genes are still repressed, suggesting that Tup1-mediated repression occurs by multiple, partially overlapping mechanisms, at least one of which is unknown.

Online version of this article contains supporting material. Online version is available at www.molbiolcell.org.

Corresponding author. E-mail address: ajohnson{at}cgl.ucsf.edu.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				T. Gligoris, G. Thireos, and D. Tzamarias The Tup1 Corepressor Directs Htz1 Deposition at a Specific Promoter Nucleosome Marking the GAL1 Gene for Rapid Activation Mol. Cell. Biol., June 1, 2007; 27(11): 4198 - 4205. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Argimon, J. A. Wishart, R. Leng, S. Macaskill, A. Mavor, T. Alexandris, S. Nicholls, A. W. Knight, B. Enjalbert, R. Walmsley, et al. Developmental Regulation of an Adhesin Gene during Cellular Morphogenesis in the Fungal Pathogen Candida albicans Eukaryot. Cell, April 1, 2007; 6(4): 682 - 692. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. Rothfels, J. C. Tanny, E. Molnar, H. Friesen, C. Commisso, and J. Segall Components of the ESCRT Pathway, DFG16, and YGR122w Are Required for Rim101 To Act as a Corepressor with Nrg1 at the Negative Regulatory Element of the DIT1 Gene of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Mol. Cell. Biol., August 1, 2005; 25(15): 6772 - 6788. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. R. Green and A. D. Johnson Genome-wide Analysis of the Functions of a Conserved Surface on the Corepressor Tup1 Mol. Biol. Cell, June 1, 2005; 16(6): 2605 - 2613. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. Kadosh and A. D. Johnson Induction of the Candida albicans Filamentous Growth Program by Relief of Transcriptional Repression: A Genome-wide Analysis Mol. Biol. Cell, June 1, 2005; 16(6): 2903 - 2912. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Garcia-Sanchez, A. L. Mavor, C. L. Russell, S. Argimon, P. Dennison, B. Enjalbert, and A. J.P. Brown Global Roles of Ssn6 in Tup1- and Nrg1-dependent Gene Regulation in the Fungal Pathogen, Candida albicans Mol. Biol. Cell, June 1, 2005; 16(6): 2913 - 2925. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				X.-J. Yang and S. Gregoire Class II Histone Deacetylases: from Sequence to Function, Regulation, and Clinical Implication Mol. Cell. Biol., April 15, 2005; 25(8): 2873 - 2884. [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. G. Klinkenberg, T. A. Mennella, K. Luetkenhaus, and R. S. Zitomer Combinatorial Repression of the Hypoxic Genes of Saccharomyces cerevisiae by DNA Binding Proteins Rox1 and Mot3 Eukaryot. Cell, April 1, 2005; 4(4): 649 - 660. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Z. Ansari, A. Ogirala, and M. Ptashne Transcriptional activating regions target attached substrates to a cyclin-dependent kinase PNAS, February 15, 2005; 102(7): 2346 - 2349. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]