|
|
|
|
Vol. 16, Issue 5, 2518-2528, May 2005
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Associated with Replication Foci in Mammalian S-Phase Nucleus



||
* Laboratory of Chromosome Stability, Institute of Cytology, Russian Academy of Sciences, 194064 St. Petersburg, Russia;
Institute of Experimental Medicine, Russian Academy of Medical Sciences, 197376 St. Petersburg, Russia;
Graduate School of Frontier Biosciences, Osaka University, Osaka 565-0871, Japan;
Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Medicine, School of Medicine, University of California, Davis, CA 95616; and
|| Bioscience Division, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM 87545
Submitted December 10, 2004;
Revised February 15, 2005;
Accepted February 21, 2005
Monitoring Editor: Joseph Gall
Originally detected in fixed cells, DNA replication foci (RFi) were later visualized in living cells by using green fluorescent protein (GFP)-tagged proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) and DNA ligase I. It was shown using fluorescence redistribution after photobleaching (FRAP) assay that focal GFP-PCNA slowly exchanged, suggesting the existence of a stable replication holocomplex. Here, we used the FRAP assay to study the dynamics of the GFP-tagged PCNA-binding proteins: Flap endonuclease 1 (Fen1) and DNA polymerase
(Pol
). We also used the GFP-Cockayne syndrome group A (CSA) protein, which does associate with transcription foci after DNA damage. In normal cells, GFP-Pol
and GFP-Fen1 are mobile with residence times at RFi (tm)
2 and
0.8 s, respectively. GFP-CSA is also mobile but does not concentrate at discrete foci. After methyl methanesulfonate (MMS) damage, the mobile fraction of focal GFP-Fen1 decreased and tm increased, but it then recovered. The mobilities of focal GFP-Pol
and GFP-PCNA did not change after MMS. The mobility of GFP-CSA did not change after UV-irradiation. These data indicate that the normal replication complex contains at least two mobile subunits. The decrease of the mobile fraction of focal GFP-Fen1 after DNA damage suggests that Fen1 exchange depends on the rate of movement of replication forks.
The online version of this article contains supplemental material at MBC Online (http://www.molbiolcell.org).
Address correspondence to: Nikolai Tomilin (nvtom{at}mail.ru).
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. R. Schultz-Norton, V. A. Gabisi, Y. S. Ziegler, I. X. McLeod, J. R. Yates, and A. M. Nardulli Interaction of estrogen receptor {alpha} with proliferating cell nuclear antigen Nucleic Acids Res., August 1, 2007; 35(15): 5028 - 5038. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Saijo, T. Hirai, A. Ogawa, A. Kobayashi, S. Kamiuchi, and K. Tanaka Functional TFIIH Is Required for UV-Induced Translocation of CSA to the Nuclear Matrix Mol. Cell. Biol., April 1, 2007; 27(7): 2538 - 2547. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Prosperi The fellowship of the rings: distinct pools of proliferating cell nuclear antigen trimer at work FASEB J, May 1, 2006; 20(7): 833 - 837. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||