![[Feedback]](/icons/banner/feedbackACT.gif){kind=icon}
![[For Subscribers]](/icons/banner/subscriberACT.gif){kind=icon}
![[Archive]](/icons/banner/archiveACT.gif){kind=icon}
![[Search]](/icons/banner/searchACT.gif){kind=icon}
![[Contents]](/icons/banner/tocACT.gif){kind=icon}
|
|
|
|
|
||
Vol. 17, Issue 5, 2158-2165, May 2006
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
* Division of Shared Resources, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA 98109;
Department of Zoology, University of Basel, CH-4056 Basel, Switzerland;
Department of Molecular Biology and Biochemistry, Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ 08544; and
|| Department of Biophysics and Biochemistry, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94143-2240
Submitted January 17, 2006;
Accepted February 10, 2006
Monitoring Editor: Yixian Zheng
Chromosome organization inside the nucleus is not random but rather is determined by a variety of factors, including interactions between chromosomes and nuclear components such as the nuclear envelope or nuclear matrix. Such interactions may be critical for proper nuclear organization, chromosome partitioning during cell division, and gene regulation. An important, but poorly documented subset, includes interactions between specific chromosomal regions. Interactions of this type are thought to be involved in long-range promoter regulation by distant enhancers or locus control regions and may underlie phenomena such as transvection. Here, we used an in vivo microscopy assay based on Lac Repressor/operator recognition to show that Mcp, a polycomb response element from the Drosophila bithorax complex, is able to mediate physical interaction between remote chromosomal regions. These interactions are tissue specific, can take place between multiple Mcp elements, and seem to be stable once established. We speculate that this ability to interact may be part of the mechanism through which Mcp mediates its regulatory function in the bithorax complex.
Abbreviations used: PRE, polycomb response element.
The online version of this article contains supplemental material at MBC Online (http://www.molbiolcell.org).
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Address correspondence to: Julio Vazquez (jvazquez{at}fhcrc.org).
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  S. A. Ou, E. Chang, S. Lee, K. So, C.-t. Wu, and J. R. Morris Effects of Chromosomal Rearrangements on Transvection at the yellow Gene of Drosophila melanogaster Genetics, October 1, 2009; 183(2): 483 - 496. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M. Fujioka, X. Wu, and J. B. Jaynes A chromatin insulator mediates transgene homing and very long-range enhancer-promoter communication Development, September 15, 2009; 136(18): 3077 - 3087. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 V. S. Chopra, J. Cande, J.-W. Hong, and M. Levine Stalled Hox promoters as chromosomal boundaries Genes & Dev., July 1, 2009; 23(13): 1505 - 1509. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 T. A. Hartl, H. F. Smith, and G. Bosco Chromosome Alignment and Transvection Are Antagonized by Condensin II Science, November 28, 2008; 322(5906): 1384 - 1387. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. R. Bateman and C.-t. Wu A Genomewide Survey Argues That Every Zygotic Gene Product Is Dispensable for the Initiation of Somatic Homolog Pairing in Drosophila Genetics, November 1, 2008; 180(3): 1329 - 1342. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 O. Kyrchanova, S. Toshchakov, Y. Podstreshnaya, A. Parshikov, and P. Georgiev Functional Interaction between the Fab-7 and Fab-8 Boundaries and the Upstream Promoter Region in the Drosophila Abd-B Gene Mol. Cell. Biol., June 15, 2008; 28(12): 4188 - 4195. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 D. Chetverina, E. Savitskaya, O. Maksimenko, L. Melnikova, O. Zaytseva, A. Parshikov, A. V. Galkin, and P. Georgiev Red flag on the white reporter: a versatile insulator abuts the white gene in Drosophila and is omnipresent in mini-white constructs Nucleic Acids Res., February 11, 2008; 36(3): 929 - 937. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. Gohl, M. Muller, V. Pirrotta, M. Affolter, and P. Schedl Enhancer Blocking and Transvection at the Drosophila apterous Locus Genetics, January 1, 2008; 178(1): 127 - 143. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
B. R. Williams, J. R. Bateman, N. D. Novikov, and C.-T. Wu Disruption of Topoisomerase II Perturbs Pairing in Drosophila Cell Culture Genetics, September 1, 2007; 177(1): 31 - 46. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 I. U. Rafalska-Metcalf and S. M. Janicki Show and tell: visualizing gene expression in living cells J. Cell Sci., July 15, 2007; 120(14): 2301 - 2307. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. C. Frydrychova, H. Biessmann, A. Y. Konev, M. D. Golubovsky, J. Johnson, T. K. Archer, and J. M. Mason Transcriptional Activity of the Telomeric Retrotransposon HeT-A in Drosophila melanogaster Is Stimulated as a Consequence of Subterminal Deficiencies at Homologous and Nonhomologous Telomeres Mol. Cell. Biol., July 1, 2007; 27(13): 4991 - 5001. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
O. Kyrchanova, S. Toshchakov, A. Parshikov, and P. Georgiev Study of the Functional Interaction between Mcp Insulators from the Drosophila bithorax Complex: Effects of Insulator Pairing on Enhancer-Promoter Communication Mol. Cell. Biol., April 15, 2007; 27(8): 3035 - 3043. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
G. Cavalli Chromatin and epigenetics in development: blending cellular memory with cell fate plasticity Development, June 1, 2006; 133(11): 2089 - 2094. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M.C. ANGUERA, B.K. SUN, N. XU, and J.T. LEE X-Chromosome Kiss and Tell: How the Xs Go Their Separate Ways Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol, January 1, 2006; 71(0): 429 - 437. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
