|
|
|
|
Vol. 17, Issue 5, 2401-2414, May 2006
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||




* Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94143-2200;
Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94143-2200; and
Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, CA 94720
Submitted November 14, 2005;
Revised February 7, 2006;
Accepted February 8, 2006
Monitoring Editor: Orna Cohen-Fix
To maintain genomic stability, reinitiation of eukaryotic DNA replication within a single cell cycle is blocked by multiple mechanisms that inactivate or remove replication proteins after G1 phase. Consistent with the prevailing notion that these mechanisms are redundant, we previously showed that simultaneous deregulation of three replication proteins, ORC, Cdc6, and Mcm2-7, was necessary to cause detectable bulk re-replication in G2/M phase in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. In this study, we used microarray comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) to provide a more comprehensive and detailed analysis of re-replication. This genome-wide analysis suggests that reinitiation in G2/M phase primarily occurs at a subset of both active and latent origins, but is independent of chromosomal determinants that specify the use and timing of these origins in S phase. We demonstrate that re-replication can be induced within S phase, but differs in amount and location from re-replication in G2/M phase, illustrating the dynamic nature of DNA replication controls. Finally, we show that very limited re-replication can be detected by microarray CGH when only two replication proteins are deregulated, suggesting that the mechanisms blocking re-replication are not redundant. Therefore we propose that eukaryotic re-replication at levels below current detection limits may be more prevalent and a greater source of genomic instability than previously appreciated.
The online version of this article contains supplemental material at MBC Online (http://www.molbiolcell.org).
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Address correspondence to: Joachim J. Li (joachim.li{at}ucsf.edu).
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
E. Lau, T. Tsuji, L. Guo, S.-H. Lu, and W. Jiang The role of pre-replicative complex (pre-RC) components in oncogenesis FASEB J, December 1, 2007; 21(14): 3786 - 3794. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Speck and B. Stillman Cdc6 ATPase Activity Regulates ORC{middle dot}Cdc6 Stability and the Selection of Specific DNA Sequences as Origins of DNA Replication J. Biol. Chem., April 20, 2007; 282(16): 11705 - 11714. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Honey and B. Futcher Roles of the CDK Phosphorylation Sites of Yeast Cdc6 in Chromatin Binding and Rereplication Mol. Biol. Cell, April 1, 2007; 18(4): 1324 - 1336. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. A. Braun and L. L. Breeden Nascent Transcription of MCM2-7 Is Important for Nuclear Localization of the Minichromosome Maintenance Complex in G1 Mol. Biol. Cell, April 1, 2007; 18(4): 1447 - 1456. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. E. Arias and J. C. Walter Strength in numbers: preventing rereplication via multiple mechanisms in eukaryotic cells Genes & Dev., March 1, 2007; 21(5): 497 - 518. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. E. Ikui, V. Archambault, B. J. Drapkin, V. Campbell, and F. R. Cross Cyclin and Cyclin-Dependent Kinase Substrate Requirements for Preventing Rereplication Reveal the Need for Concomitant Activation and Inhibition Genetics, March 1, 2007; 175(3): 1011 - 1022. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. E. Tanny, D. M. MacAlpine, H. G. Blitzblau, and S. P. Bell Genome-wide Analysis of Re-replication Reveals Inhibitory Controls That Target Multiple Stages of Replication Initiation Mol. Biol. Cell, May 1, 2006; 17(5): 2415 - 2423. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||