QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

Vol. 17, Issue 9, 4063-4068, September 2006

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: E06-03-0200v1 17/9/4063    most recent Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Junne, T. Articles by Spiess, M. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Junne, T. Articles by Spiess, M.

The Plug Domain of Yeast Sec61p Is Important for Efficient Protein Translocation, but Is Not Essential for Cell Viability

Biozentrum, University of Basel, CH-4056 Basel, Switzerland

Submitted March 14, 2006; Revised June 8, 2006; Accepted June 22, 2006
Monitoring Editor: Reid Gilmore

The Sec61/SecY translocon mediates translocation of proteins across the membrane and integration of membrane proteins into the lipid bilayer. The structure of the translocon revealed a plug domain blocking the pore on the lumenal side. It was proposed to be important for gating the protein conducting channel and for maintaining the permeability barrier in its unoccupied state. Here, we analyzed in yeast the effect of introducing destabilizing point mutations in the plug domain or of its partial or complete deletion. Unexpectedly, even when the entire plug domain was deleted, cells were viable without growth phenotype. They showed an effect on signal sequence orientation of diagnostic signal-anchor proteins, a minor defect in cotranslational and a significant deficiency in posttranslational translocation. Steady-state levels of the mutant protein were reduced, and when coexpressed with wild-type Sec61p, the mutant lacking the plug competed poorly for complex partners. The results suggest that the plug is unlikely to be important for sealing the translocation pore in yeast but that it plays a role in stabilizing Sec61p during translocon formation.

* Present address: Department of Cell Biology, Harvard Medical School, 240 Longwood Ave., Boston, MA 02115.

Address correspondence to: Martin Spiess (martin.spiess{at}unibas.ch)

Abbreviations used: 5-FOA, 5-fluoroorotic acid; CPY, carboxypeptidase Y; DPAPB, dipeptidyl aminopeptidase B; ER, endoplasmic reticulum; GPD, glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase

This article has been cited by other articles:

				D. Boy and H.-G. Koch Visualization of Distinct Entities of the SecYEG Translocon during Translocation and Integration of Bacterial Proteins Mol. Biol. Cell, March 15, 2009; 20(6): 1804 - 1815. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				F. Kiefer, K. Arnold, M. Kunzli, L. Bordoli, and T. Schwede The SWISS-MODEL Repository and associated resources Nucleic Acids Res., January 1, 2009; 37(suppl_1): D387 - D392. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Gumbart and K. Schulten The Roles of Pore Ring and Plug in the SecY Protein-conducting Channel J. Gen. Physiol., December 1, 2008; 132(6): 709 - 719. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. Junne, T. Schwede, V. Goder, and M. Spiess Mutations in the Sec61p Channel Affecting Signal Sequence Recognition and Membrane Protein Topology J. Biol. Chem., November 9, 2007; 282(45): 33201 - 33209. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. Bol, J. G. de Wit, and A. J. M. Driessen The Active Protein-conducting Channel of Escherichia coli Contains an Apolar Patch J. Biol. Chem., October 12, 2007; 282(41): 29785 - 29793. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				W. Ng, T. Sergeyenko, N. Zeng, J. D. Brown, and K. Romisch Characterization of the proteasome interaction with the Sec61 channel in the endoplasmic reticulum J. Cell Sci., February 15, 2007; 120(4): 682 - 691. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. P. Maillard, S. Lalani, F. Silva, D. Belin, and F. Duong Deregulation of the SecYEG Translocation Channel upon Removal of the Plug Domain J. Biol. Chem., January 12, 2007; 282(2): 1281 - 1287. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]