Molecular Biology of the Cell click for ASCB 2010 Annual Meeting page

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Originally published as MBoC in Press, 10.1091/mbc.E08-09-0950 on January 28, 2009

Vol. 20, Issue 7, 1903-1915, April 1, 2009

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplemental Materials
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
E08-09-0950v1
20/7/1903    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Du, K.
Right arrow Articles by Lukacs, G. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Du, K.
Right arrow Articles by Lukacs, G. L.

Cooperative Assembly and Misfolding of CFTR Domains In Vivo

Kai Du, and Gergely L. Lukacs

Department of Physiology, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada H3G 1Y6

Submitted September 18, 2008; Revised January 7, 2009; Accepted January 22, 2009
Monitoring Editor: Reid Gilmore

The cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) architecture consists of two membrane spanning domains (MSD1 and -2), two nucleotide binding domains (NBD1 and -2), and a regulatory (R) domain. Several point mutations lead to the channel misprocessing, with limited structural perturbation of the mutant domain. To gain more insight into the basis of CFTR folding defect, the contribution of domain-wise and cooperative domain folding was assessed by determining 1) the minimal domain combination that is recognized as native and can efficiently escape the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) retention and 2) the impact of mutation on the conformational coupling among domains. One-, two-, three-, and most of the four-domain assemblies were retained at the ER. Solubilization mutations, however, rescued the NBD1 processing defect conceivably by thermodynamic stabilization. The smallest folding unit that traversed the secretory pathway was composed of MSD1-NBD1-R-MSD2 as a linear or split polypeptide. Cystic fibrosis-causing missense mutations in the MSD1, NBD1, MSD2, and NBD2 caused conformational defect in multiple domains. We propose that cooperative posttranslational folding is required for domain stabilization and provides a plausible explanation for the global misfolding caused by point mutations dispersed along the full-length CFTR.


This was published online ahead of print in MBC in Press (http://www.molbiolcell.org/cgi/doi/10.1091/mbc.E08-09-0950) on January 28, 2009.

Address correspondence to: Gergely L. Lukacs (gergely.lukacs{at}mcgill.ca)




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Mol. Biol. CellHome page
G. Roy, E. M. Chalfin, A. Saxena, and X. Wang
Interplay between ER Exit Code and Domain Conformation in CFTR Misprocessing and Rescue
Mol. Biol. Cell, February 15, 2010; 21(4): 597 - 609.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Biol. CellHome page
D. E. Grove, M. F.N. Rosser, H. Y. Ren, A. P. Naren, and D. M. Cyr
Mechanisms for Rescue of Correctable Folding Defects in CFTR{Delta}F508
Mol. Biol. Cell, September 15, 2009; 20(18): 4059 - 4069.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Copyright © 2009 by The American Society for Cell Biology. Terms of copyright protection, warranties, and disclaimers.