|
|
|
|
GL Kiser and TA Weinert
Molecular and Cellular Biology Department, University of Arizona, Tucson 85721, USA.
In eukaryotic cells, checkpoint genes cause arrest of cell division when DNA is damaged or when DNA replication is blocked. In this study of budding yeast checkpoint genes, we identify and characterize another role for these checkpoint genes after DNA damage-transcriptional induction of genes. We found that three checkpoint genes (of six genes tested) have strong and distinct roles in transcriptional induction in four distinct pathways of regulation (each defined by induction of specific genes). MEC1 mediates the response in three transcriptional pathways, RAD53 mediates two of these pathways, and RAD17 mediates but a single pathway. The three other checkpoint genes (including RAD9) have small (twofold) but significant roles in transcriptional induction in all pathways. One of the pathways that we identify here leads to induction of MEC1 and RAD53 checkpoint genes themselves. This suggests a positive feedback circuit that may increase the cell's ability to respond to DNA damage. We make two primary conclusions from these studies. First, MEC1 appears to be the key regulator because it is required for all responses (both transcriptional and cell cycle arrest), while other genes serve only a subset of these responses. Second, the two types of responses, transcriptional induction and cell cycle arrest, appear distinct because both require MEC1 yet only cell cycle arrest requires RAD9. These and other results were used to formulate a working model of checkpoint gene function that accounts for roles of different checkpoint genes in different responses and after different types of damage. The conclusion that the yeast MEC1 gene is a key regulator also has implications for the role of a putative human homologue, the ATM gene.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. Laha, S. P. Das, S. Hajra, S. Sau, and P. Sinha The budding yeast protein Chl1p is required to preserve genome integrity upon DNA damage in S-phase Nucleic Acids Res., November 6, 2006; 34(20): 5880 - 5891. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. P. Kastenmayer, L. Ni, A. Chu, L. E. Kitchen, W.-C. Au, H. Yang, C. D. Carter, D. Wheeler, R. W. Davis, J. D. Boeke, et al. Functional genomics of genes with small open reading frames (sORFs) in S. cerevisiae. Genome Res., March 1, 2006; 16(3): 365 - 373. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. D. Carter, L. E. Kitchen, W.-C. Au, C. M. Babic, and M. A. Basrai Loss of SOD1 and LYS7 Sensitizes Saccharomyces cerevisiae to Hydroxyurea and DNA Damage Agents and Downregulates MEC1 Pathway Effectors Mol. Cell. Biol., December 1, 2005; 25(23): 10273 - 10285. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Mercier, N. Berthault, N. Touleimat, F. Kepes, G. Fourel, E. Gilson, and M. Dutreix A haploid-specific transcriptional response to irradiation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae Nucleic Acids Res., November 30, 2005; 33(20): 6635 - 6643. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Zhu and W. Xiao Pdr3 is required for DNA damage induction of MAG1 and DDI1 via a bi-directional promoter element Nucleic Acids Res., September 27, 2004; 32(17): 5066 - 5075. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. L. Schollaert, J. M. Poisson, J. S. Searle, J. A. Schwanekamp, C. R. Tomlinson, and Y. Sanchez A Role for Saccharomyces cerevisiae Chk1p in the Response to Replication Blocks Mol. Biol. Cell, September 1, 2004; 15(9): 4051 - 4063. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Aylon and M. Kupiec The Checkpoint Protein Rad24 of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Is Involved in Processing Double-Strand Break Ends and in Recombination Partner Choice Mol. Cell. Biol., September 15, 2003; 23(18): 6585 - 6596. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
X. Jia and W. Xiao Compromised DNA Repair Enhances Sensitivity of the Yeast RNR3-lacZ Genotoxicity Testing System Toxicol. Sci., September 1, 2003; 75(1): 82 - 88. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Chang, M. Bellaoui, C. Boone, and G. W. Brown A genome-wide screen for methyl methanesulfonate-sensitive mutants reveals genes required for S phase progression in the presence of DNA damage PNAS, December 24, 2002; 99(26): 16934 - 16939. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Oshiro, L. M. Wodicka, M. P. Washburn, J. R. Yates III, D. J. Lockhart, and E. A. Winzeler Parallel Identification of New Genes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae Genome Res., August 1, 2002; 12(8): 1210 - 1220. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. M. Kim, Y. K. Jang, and S. D. Park Phosphorylation of Rph1, a damage-responsive repressor of PHR1 in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, is dependent upon Rad53 kinase Nucleic Acids Res., February 1, 2002; 30(3): 643 - 648. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. K. Chakraverty, J. M. Kearsey, T. J. Oakley, M. Grenon, M.-A. de la Torre Ruiz, N. F. Lowndes, and I. D. Hickson Topoisomerase III Acts Upstream of Rad53p in the S-Phase DNA Damage Checkpoint Mol. Cell. Biol., November 1, 2001; 21(21): 7150 - 7162. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. J. Foss Tof1p Regulates DNA Damage Responses During S Phase in Saccharomyces cerevisiae Genetics, February 1, 2001; 157(2): 567 - 577. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
M. L. Stitzel, R. Durso, and J. C. Reese The proteasome regulates the UV-induced activation of the AP-1-like transcription factor Gcn4 Genes & Dev., January 15, 2001; 15(2): 128 - 133. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
Y. S. Shim, Y. K. Jang, M. S. Lim, J. S. Lee, R. H. Seong, S. H. Hong, and S. D. Park Rdp1, a Novel Zinc Finger Protein, Regulates the DNA Damage Response of rhp51+ from Schizosaccharomyces pombe Mol. Cell. Biol., December 1, 2000; 20(23): 8958 - 8968. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
V. I. Bashkirov, J. S. King, E. V. Bashkirova, J. Schmuckli-Maurer, and W.-D. Heyer DNA Repair Protein Rad55 Is a Terminal Substrate of the DNA Damage Checkpoints Mol. Cell. Biol., June 15, 2000; 20(12): 4393 - 4404. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
M.-C. Marsolier, P. Roussel, C. Leroy, and C. Mann Involvement of the PP2C-Like Phosphatase Ptc2p in the DNA Checkpoint Pathways of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Genetics, April 1, 2000; 154(4): 1523 - 1532. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
A. F. Hofmann and S. D. Harris The Aspergillus nidulans uvsB Gene Encodes an ATM-Related Kinase Required for Multiple Facets of the DNA Damage Response Genetics, April 1, 2000; 154(4): 1577 - 1586. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
Y. K. Jang, L. Wang, and G. B. Sancar RPH1 and GIS1 Are Damage-Responsive Repressors of PHR1 Mol. Cell. Biol., November 1, 1999; 19(11): 7630 - 7638. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. A. Basrai, V. E. Velculescu, K. W. Kinzler, and P. Hieter NORF5/HUG1 Is a Component of the MEC1-Mediated Checkpoint Response to DNA Damage and Replication Arrest in Saccharomyces cerevisiae Mol. Cell. Biol., October 1, 1999; 19(10): 7041 - 7049. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. R. Dohrmann, G. Oshiro, M. Tecklenburg, and R. A. Sclafani RAD53 Regulates DBF4 Independently of Checkpoint Function in Saccharomyces cerevisiae Genetics, March 1, 1999; 151(3): 965 - 977. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
S. A. Jelinsky and L. D. Samson Global response of Saccharomyces cerevisiae to an alkylating agent PNAS, February 16, 1999; 96(4): 1486 - 1491. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. A. Vallen and F. R. Cross Interaction Between the MEC1-Dependent DNA Synthesis Checkpoint and G1 Cyclin Function in Saccharomyces cerevisiae Genetics, February 1, 1999; 151(2): 459 - 471. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
A. G. Paulovich, C. D. Armour, and L. H. Hartwell The Saccharomyces cerevisiae RAD9, RAD17, RAD24 and MEC3 Genes Are Required for Tolerating Irreparable, Ultraviolet-Induced DNA Damage Genetics, September 1, 1998; 150(1): 75 - 93. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
J. A. Flattery-O'Brien and I. W. Dawes Hydrogen Peroxide Causes RAD9-dependent Cell Cycle Arrest in G2 in Saccharomyces cerevisiae whereas Menadione Causes G1 Arrest Independent of RAD9 Function J. Biol. Chem., April 10, 1998; 273(15): 8564 - 8571. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. M. Sidorova and L. L. Breeden Rad53-dependent phosphorylation of Swi6 and down-regulation of CLN1 and CLN2 transcription occur in response to DNA damage in Saccharomyces cerevisiae Genes & Dev., November 15, 1997; 11(22): 3032 - 3045. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Ho, S. Mason, R. Kobayashi, M. Hoekstra, and B. Andrews Role of the casein kinase I isoform, Hrr25, and the cell cycle-regulatory transcription factor, SBF, in the transcriptional response to DNA damage in Saccharomyces cerevisiae PNAS, January 21, 1997; 94(2): 581 - 586. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. S. Brush, D. M. Morrow, P. Hieter, and T. J. Kelly The ATM homologue MEC1 is required for phosphorylation of replication protein A in yeast PNAS, December 24, 1996; 93(26): 15075 - 15080. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. J. Elledge Cell Cycle Checkpoints: Preventing an Identity Crisis Science, December 6, 1996; 274(5293): 1664 - 1672. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
T A Navas, Y Sanchez, and S J Elledge RAD9 and DNA polymerase epsilon form parallel sensory branches for transducing the DNA damage checkpoint signal in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genes & Dev., October 15, 1996; 10(20): 2632 - 2643. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M.-J. Chen, Y.-T. Lin, H. B. Lieberman, G. Chen, and E. Y.-H. P. Lee ATM-dependent Phosphorylation of Human Rad9 Is Required for Ionizing Radiation-induced Checkpoint Activation J. Biol. Chem., May 4, 2001; 276(19): 16580 - 16586. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Zhang, Z. Zhu, G. Vidanes, D. Mbangkollo, Y. Liu, and W. Siede Characterization of DNA Damage-stimulated Self-interaction of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Checkpoint Protein Rad17p J. Biol. Chem., July 6, 2001; 276(28): 26715 - 26723. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Li and J. C. Reese Ssn6-Tup1 Regulates RNR3 by Positioning Nucleosomes and Affecting the Chromatin Structure at the Upstream Repression Sequence J. Biol. Chem., August 31, 2001; 276(36): 33788 - 33797. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||