Molecular Biology of the Cell track citations

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hunt, A. J.
Right arrow Articles by McIntosh, J. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hunt, A. J.
Right arrow Articles by McIntosh, J. R.

The Dynamic Behavior of Individual Microtubules Associated with Chromosomes In Vitro

Alan J. Hunt, and J. Richard McIntosh*

Department of Molecular, Cellular, and Developmental Biology, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado 80309

Mitotic movements of chromosomes are usually coupled to the elongation and shortening of the microtubules to which they are bound. The lengths of kinetochore-associated microtubules change by incorporation or loss of tubulin subunits, principally at their chromosome-bound ends. We have reproduced aspects of this phenomenon in vitro, using a real-time assay that displays directly the movements of individual chromosome-associated microtubules as they elongate and shorten. Chromosomes isolated from cultured Chinese hamster ovary cells were adhered to coverslips and then allowed to bind labeled microtubules. In the presence of tubulin and GTP, these microtubules could grow at their chromosome-bound ends, causing the labeled segments to move away from the chromosomes, even in the absence of ATP. Sometimes a microtubule would switch to shortening, causing the direction of movement to change abruptly. The link between a microtubule and a chromosome was mechanically strong; 15 pN of tension was generally insufficient to detach a microtubule, even though it could add subunits at the kinetochore-microtubule junction. The behavior of the microtubules in vitro was regulated by the chromosomes to which they were bound; the frequency of transitions from polymerization to depolymerization was decreased, and the speed of depolymerization-coupled movement toward chromosomes was only one-fifth the rate of shortening for microtubules free in solution. Our results are consistent with a model in which each microtubule interacts with an increasing number of chromosome-associated binding sites as it approaches the kinetochore.


*   Corresponding author.



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
MutagenesisHome page
P. Thomas and M. Fenech
Chromosome 17 and 21 aneuploidy in buccal cells is increased with ageing and in Alzheimer's disease
Mutagenesis, January 1, 2008; 23(1): 57 - 65.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
J. Liu and J. N. Onuchic
A driving and coupling "Pac-Man" mechanism for chromosome poleward translocation in anaphase A
PNAS, December 5, 2006; 103(49): 18432 - 18437.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev.Home page
R. Carballido-Lopez
The Bacterial Actin-Like Cytoskeleton
Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev., December 1, 2006; 70(4): 888 - 909.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
G. J. Brouhard and A. J. Hunt
Microtubule movements on the arms of mitotic chromosomes: Polar ejection forces quantified in vitro
PNAS, September 27, 2005; 102(39): 13903 - 13908.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Cell Sci.Home page
H. Maiato, J. DeLuca, E. D. Salmon, and W. C. Earnshaw
The dynamic kinetochore-microtubule interface
J. Cell Sci., November 1, 2004; 117(23): 5461 - 5477.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Biol. CellHome page
C. G. Pearson, P. S. Maddox, T. R. Zarzar, E.D. Salmon, and K. Bloom
Yeast Kinetochores Do Not Stabilize Stu2p-dependent Spindle Microtubule Dynamics
Mol. Biol. Cell, October 1, 2003; 14(10): 4181 - 4195.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biophys. JHome page
B. L. Sprague, C. G. Pearson, P. S. Maddox, K. S. Bloom, E. D. Salmon, and David. J. Odde
Mechanisms of Microtubule-Based Kinetochore Positioning in the Yeast Metaphase Spindle
Biophys. J., June 1, 2003; 84(6): 3529 - 3546.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biophys. JHome page
A. P. Joglekar and A. J. Hunt
A Simple, Mechanistic Model for Directional Instability during Mitotic Chromosome Movements
Biophys. J., July 1, 2002; 83(1): 42 - 58.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ScienceHome page
L. Lee, J. S. Tirnauer, J. Li, S. C. Schuyler, J. Y. Liu, and D. Pellman
Positioning of the Mitotic Spindle by a Cortical-Microtubule Capture Mechanism
Science, March 24, 2000; 287(5461): 2260 - 2262.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J. Cell Sci.Home page
A. Hunter and L Wordeman
How motor proteins influence microtubule polymerization dynamics
J. Cell Sci., January 12, 2000; 113(24): 4379 - 4389.
[Abstract] [PDF]




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]