|
|
|
|
A more recent version of this article appeared on January 1, 2004
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Submitted on June 17, 2003
Revised on September 8, 2003
Accepted on September 22, 2003
1 Interdepartmental Program in Cell and Molecular Biology, Dept. of Molecular and Cellular Biology; Baylor College of Medicine, One Baylor Plaza, Houston, TX. 77030; These two authors contributed equally to this work
2 Dept. of Molecular and Cellular Biology; Baylor College of Medicine, One Baylor Plaza, Houston, TX. 77030; These two authors contributed equally to this work
3 Interdepartmental Program in Cell and Molecular Biology, Dept. of Molecular and Cellular Biology; Baylor College of Medicine, One Baylor Plaza, Houston, TX. 77030
* Corresponding author. E-mail address: mmoore{at}bcm.tmc.edu.
RCC1 binding to chromatin is highly dynamic, as determined by FRAP
analysis of GFP-RCC1 in stably transfected tsBN2 cells. Microinjection
of wt or Q69L Ran markedly slowed the mobility of GFP-RCC1, while T24N
Ran (defective in nucleotide loading) decreased it further still. We
found significant alterations in the mobility of intranuclear GFP-RCC1
after treatment with agents that disrupt different Ran-dependent
nuclear export pathways. Leptomycin B, which inhibits
Crm1/RanGTP-dependent nuclear export, significantly increased the
mobility of RCC1 as did high levels of actinomycin D (to inhibit RNA
polymerases I, II, and III) or
-amanitin (to inhibit RNA
polymerases II and III) as well as energy depletion. Inhibition of just
mRNA transcription, however, had no affect on GFP-RCC1 mobility
consistent with mRNA export being a Ran-independent process. In
permeabilized cells, cytosol and GTP were required for the efficient
release of GFP-RCC1 from chromatin. Recombinant Ran would not
substitute for cytosol, and high levels of supplemental Ran inhibited
the cytosol-stimulated release. Thus, RCC1 release from chromatin in
vitro requires a factor(s) distinct from, or in addition to, Ran and
appears linked in vivo to the availability of Ran-dependent transport
cargo.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
F. E. Hood and P. R. Clarke RCC1 isoforms differ in their affinity for chromatin, molecular interactions and regulation by phosphorylation J. Cell Sci., October 1, 2007; 120(19): 3436 - 3445. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. Kwon, J. Lee, S. H. Chang, N. C. Jung, B. J. Lee, G. H. Son, K. Kim, and K. H. Lee BMAL1 Shuttling Controls Transactivation and Degradation of the CLOCK/BMAL1 Heterodimer. Mol. Cell. Biol., October 1, 2006; 26(19): 7318 - 7330. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Shire, P. Kapoor, K. Jiang, M. N. T. Hing, N. Sivachandran, T. Nguyen, and L. Frappier Regulation of the EBNA1 Epstein-Barr Virus Protein by Serine Phosphorylation and Arginine Methylation. J. Virol., June 1, 2006; 80(11): 5261 - 5272. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Beaudouin, F. Mora-Bermudez, T. Klee, N. Daigle, and J. Ellenberg Dissecting the Contribution of Diffusion and Interactions to the Mobility of Nuclear Proteins Biophys. J., March 15, 2006; 90(6): 1878 - 1894. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. M. Anobile, V. Arumugaswami, D. Downs, K. Czymmek, M. Parcells, and C. J. Schmidt Nuclear Localization and Dynamic Properties of the Marek's Disease Virus Oncogene Products Meq and Meq/vIL8 J. Virol., February 1, 2006; 80(3): 1160 - 1166. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. J. Dilworth, A. J. Tackett, R. S. Rogers, E. C. Yi, R. H. Christmas, J. J. Smith, A. F. Siegel, B. T. Chait, R. W. Wozniak, and J. D. Aitchison The mobile nucleoporin Nup2p and chromatin-bound Prp20p function in endogenous NPC-mediated transcriptional control J. Cell Biol., December 19, 2005; 171(6): 955 - 965. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||