Molecular Biology of the Cell Call for Nominations: MBC Editor-in-Chief

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] --
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


MBC in Press, published online ahead of print September 29, 2004
Mol. Biol. Cell 10.1091/mbc.E04-07-0589

A more recent version of this article appeared on December 1, 2004
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplemental Material
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
E04-07-0589v1
15/12/5208    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ayaydin, F.
Right arrow Articles by Dasso, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ayaydin, F.
Right arrow Articles by Dasso, M.

Submitted on July 14, 2004
Accepted on September 15, 2004

Distinct In Vivo Dynamics of Vertebrate SUMO Paralogues

Ferhan Ayaydin and Mary Dasso*

Laboratory of Gene Regulation and Development, National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892-5431

Monitoring Editor: Joseph Gall

There are three mammalian SUMO paralogues: SUMO-1 is ~45% identical to SUMO-2 and SUMO-3, which are 96% identical to each other. It is currently unclear whether SUMO-1, -2 and -3 function in ways that are unique, redundant or antagonistic. To address this question, we examined the dynamics of individual SUMO paralogues using cell lines that stably express each of the mammalian SUMO proteins fused to the yellow fluorescent protein (YFP). While SUMO-2 and -3 showed very similar distributions throughout the nucleoplasm, SUMO-1 was uniquely distributed to the nuclear envelope and to the nucleolus. Photobleaching experiments revealed that SUMO-1 dynamics were much slower than SUMO-2 and -3 dynamics. Additionally, the mobility of SUMO paralogues differed between subnuclear structures. Finally, the timing and distributions were dissimilar between paralogues as cells exited from mitosis. SUMO-1 was recruited to nuclear membrane as nuclear envelopes reformed in late anaphase, and accumulated rapidly into the nucleus. SUMO-2 and SUMO-3 localized to chromosome earlier, and accumulated gradually during telophase. Together, these findings demonstrate that mammalian SUMO-1 shows patterns of utilization that are clearly discrete from the patterns of SUMO-2 and -3 throughout the cell cycle, arguing that it is functionally distinct and specifically regulated in vivo.


*Corresponding author. E-mail: mdasso{at}helix.nih.gov







Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] --
Copyright © 2004 by The American Society for Cell Biology. Terms of copyright protection, warranties, and disclaimers.