|
|
|
|
A more recent version of this article appeared on September 1, 2005
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Submitted on November 8, 2004
Revised on June 3, 2005
Accepted on June 14, 2005
*Department of Biology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-3280;
Institute of Molecular Biology, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR 97403;
Center for Molecular Medicine, University of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington, CT 06030-3101
Monitoring Editor: Thomas Pollard
How microtubules act to position the plane of cell division during cytokinesis is a topic of much debate. Recently we showed that a subpopulation of stable microtubules extends past chromosomes and interacts with the cell cortex at the site of furrowing, suggesting that these stabilized microtubules may stimulate contractility (Canman et al., 2003). To test the hypothesis that stable microtubules can position furrows, we used taxol to rapidly suppress microtubule dynamics during various stages of mitosis in PtK1 cells. Cells with stabilized prometaphase or metaphase microtubule arrays were able to initiate furrowing when induced into anaphase by inhibition of the spindle checkpoint. In these cells, few microtubules contacted the cortex. Furrows formed later than usual, were often aberrant, and did not progress to completion. Images showed that furrowing correlated with the presence of one or a few stable spindle microtubule plus ends at the cortex. Actin, myosin II, and anillin were all concentrated in these furrows, demonstrating that components of the contractile ring can be localized by stable microtubules. INCENP was not found in these ingressions, confirming that INCENP is dispensable for furrow positioning. Taxol-stabilization of the numerous microtubule-cortex interactions after anaphase onset delayed furrow initiation but did not perturb furrow positioning. We conclude that taxol-stabilized microtubules can act to position the furrow, and that loss of microtubule dynamics delays the timing of furrow onset and prevents completion. We discuss our findings relative to models for cleavage stimulation.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
C.-K. Hu, M. Coughlin, C. M. Field, and T. J. Mitchison Cell polarization during monopolar cytokinesis J. Cell Biol., April 21, 2008; 181(2): 195 - 202. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. J. C. Verbrugghe and J. G. White Cortical centralspindlin and G{alpha} have parallel roles in furrow initiation in early C. elegans embryos J. Cell Sci., May 15, 2007; 120(10): 1772 - 1778. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. P. D'Avino, M. S. Savoian, L. Capalbo, and D. M. Glover RacGAP50C is sufficient to signal cleavage furrow formation during cytokinesis J. Cell Sci., November 1, 2006; 119(21): 4402 - 4408. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||