|
|
|
|
A more recent version of this article appeared on August 1, 2007 Originally published as MBC in Press, 10.1091/mbc.E07-03-0285 on June 13, 2007
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Submitted on March 28, 2007
Revised on May 4, 2007
Accepted on May 17, 2007
*Dipartimento di Biotecnologie e Bioscienze, Università di Milano-Bicocca, 20126 Milan, Italy;
Division of Hepatology and Gene Therapy, Centro de Investigación Médica Aplicada, Universidad de Navarra, 31008 Pamplona, Espana
Monitoring Editor: Orna Cohen-Fix
Telomere structure allows cells to distinguish the natural chromosome ends from double-strand breaks (DSBs). However, DNA damage response proteins are intimately involved in telomere metabolism, suggesting that functional telomeres may be recognized as DNA damage during a time window. Here we show by two different systems that short telomeres are recognized as DSBs during the time of their replication, since they induce a transient MRX-dependent DNA damage checkpoint response during their prolonged elongation. The MRX complex, which is recruited at telomeres under these conditions, dissociates from telomeres concomitantly with checkpoint switch off when telomeres reach a new equilibrium length. We also show that MRX recruitment to telomeres is sufficient to activate the checkpoint independently of telomere elongation. We propose that MRX can signal checkpoint activation by binding to short telomeres only when they become competent for elongation. Because full length telomeres are refractory to MRX binding and the shortest telomeres are elongated of only a few base pairs per generation, this limitation may prevent unscheduled checkpoint activation during an unperturbed S phase.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. Marcand, B. Pardo, A. Gratias, S. Cahun, and I. Callebaut Multiple pathways inhibit NHEJ at telomeres Genes & Dev., May 1, 2008; 22(9): 1153 - 1158. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. P. Longhese DNA damage response at functional and dysfunctional telomeres Genes & Dev., January 15, 2008; 22(2): 125 - 140. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||