Molecular Biology of the Cell Sign up for new MBC in Press e-TOCs!

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] --
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


MBC in Press, published online ahead of print March 19, 2008
Mol. Biol. Cell 10.1091/mbc.E07-08-0840

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplemental Materials
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Noguchi, T.
Right arrow Articles by Miller, K. G.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Noguchi, T.
Right arrow Articles by Miller, K. G.

Submitted on August 27, 2007
Revised on February 20, 2008
Accepted on March 4, 2008

Proper Cellular Reorganization during Drosophila spermatid Individualization Depends on Actin Structures Composed of Two Domains, Bundles and Meshwork, that Are Differentially Regulated and Have Different Functions

Tatsuhiko Noguchi,*{dagger} Marta Lenartowska,{dagger}{ddagger} Aaron D. Rogat,{sect}|| Deborah J. Frank,{sect} and Kathryn G. Miller{sect}

{sect}Department of Biology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO 63130; {ddagger}Faculty of Biology and Earth Sciences, Institute of General and Molecular Biology, Laboratory of Developmental Biology, Nicolaus Copernicus University, 87–100 Torun, Poland; *Laboratory for Morphogenetic Signaling, Center for Developmental Biology, RIKEN Kobe, Chuo-ku, Kobe 650-0047, Japan

Monitoring Editor: David Drubin

During spermatid individualization in Drosophila, actin structures (cones) mediate cellular remodeling that separates the syncytial spermatids into individual cells. These actin cones are composed of two structural domains, a front meshwork and a rear region of parallel bundles. We show here that the two domains form separately in time, are regulated by different sets of actin-associated proteins, can be formed independently, and have different roles. Newly forming cones were composed only of bundles, while the meshwork formed later, coincident with the onset of cone movement. Polarized distributions of myosin VI, Arp2/3 complex and the actin bundling proteins, singed (fascin) and quail (villin), occurred when movement initiated. When Arp2/3 complex was absent, meshwork formation was compromised, but surprisingly, the cones still moved. Despite the fact that the cones moved, membrane reorganization and cytoplasmic exclusion were abnormal and individualization failed. In contrast, when profilin, a regulator of actin assembly, was absent, bundle formation was greatly reduced. The meshwork still formed, but no movement occurred. Analysis of this actin structure’s formation and participation in cellular reorganization provides insight into how the mechanisms used in cell motility are modified to mediate motile processes within specialized cells.


{dagger}These authors contributed equally to this work.

Present address: ||Aaron Rogat: Consortium for Policy Research in Education; University of Pennsylvania; 3440 Market Street, Suite 560, Philadelphia, PA 19104-3325.

Address correspondence to: Kathryn G. Miller (miller{at}wustl.edu)







Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] --
Copyright © 2008 by The American Society for Cell Biology. Terms of copyright protection, warranties, and disclaimers.