|
|
|
|
Vol. 11, Issue 11, 3977-3991, November 2000

-Dependence of Translocation of the
Matrix-targeting Sequence



*Institut für Biochemie und Molekularbiologie and
Fakultät für Biologie, Universität
Freiburg, D-79104 Freiburg, Germany;
Centre de
Génétique Moleculaire CNRS, Université Pierre et
Marie Curie, 91190 Gif-sur-Yvette, France; and §Institut
für Mikrobiologie, Universität Hohenheim, D-70593
Stuttgart, Germany
| |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The transport of preproteins into or across the mitochondrial inner
membrane requires the membrane potential 
across this membrane.
Two roles of 
in the import of cleavable preproteins have been
described: an electrophoretic effect on the positively charged
matrix-targeting sequences and the activation of the translocase subunit Tim23. We report the unexpected finding that deletion of a
segment within the sorting sequence of cytochrome
b2, which is located behind the
matrix-targeting sequence, strongly influenced the 
-dependence of
import. The differential 
-dependence was independent of the
submitochondrial destination of the preprotein and was not attributable
to the requirement for mitochondrial Hsp70 or Tim23. With a series of
preprotein constructs, the net charge of the sorting sequence was
altered, but the 
-dependence of import was not affected. These
results suggested that the sorting sequence contributed to the import
driving mechanism in a manner distinct from the two known roles of

. Indeed, a charge-neutral amino acid exchange in the hydrophobic
segment of the sorting sequence generated a preprotein with an even
better import, i.e. one with lower 
-dependence than the wild-type
preprotein. The sorting sequence functioned early in the import pathway
since it strongly influenced the efficiency of translocation of the matrix-targeting sequence across the inner membrane. These results suggest a model whereby an electrophoretic effect of 
on the matrix-targeting sequence is complemented by an import-stimulating activity of the sorting sequence.
| |
INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The mitochondrial outer and inner membranes contain protein
complexes that are responsible for the import of nuclear-encoded preproteins (Ryan and Jensen, 1995
; Schatz and Dobberstein, 1996
; Neupert, 1997
; Pfanner et al., 1997
). Three preprotein
translocases have been identified. The transport of preproteins across
the outer membrane is mediated by the translocase of the outer membrane (TOM) that contains receptors for preproteins and a general import pore. Two translocases of the inner membrane (TIM) exist. The TIM23 complex is responsible for import of the major class of cleavable
mitochondrial preproteins. Each cleavable preprotein carries an
amino-terminal extension (presequence) that directs the protein across
the outer and inner membranes into the matrix and is termed the
matrix-targeting sequence. The TIM23 complex consists of two integral
membrane proteins, Tim23 and Tim17, that constitute the import channel
and a peripherally attached import motor, which are formed by a dynamic
complex between the matrix heat shock protein Hsp70 and Tim44 (Schatz,
1996
; Jensen and Johnson, 1999
; Voos et al., 1999
; Bauer
et al., 2000
). The second TIM is the TIM22 complex that
mediates the insertion of a class of hydrophobic preproteins without
presequence into the inner membrane. The metabolite carriers of the
inner membrane are typical representatives of these preproteins that
contain internal targeting information in the mature protein part
(Davis et al., 1998
; Koehler et al., 1999
;
Truscott and Pfanner, 1999
; Bauer et al., 2000
; Kerscher et al., 2000
).
Two import driving forces have been found for the translocation of
preproteins into mitochondria (Schleyer et al., 1982
;
Pfanner and Neupert, 1986
; Eilers et al., 1987
; Kang
et al., 1990
; Scherer et al., 1990
; Martin
et al., 1991
; Gambill et al., 1993
). The membrane
potential 
across the inner membrane is required for transport of
preproteins via both the TIM23 complex and the TIM22 complex. The
ATP-dependent import motor consisting of matrix Hsp70 and Tim44 is
needed for preproteins imported by the TIM23 complex. In the case of
cleavable preproteins, 
promotes the transport of the
amino-terminal matrix-targeting sequence (Schleyer and Neupert, 1985
;
Martin et al., 1991
), while Hsp70 is crucial for import of
the mature portion of a preprotein by direct binding to the unfolded
polypeptide chain (Kang et al., 1990
; Ostermann et
al., 1990
; Scherer et al., 1990
; Gambill et
al., 1993
). Two roles for 
in the import of cleavable
preproteins have been assigned. 1) An electrophoretic effect of 
on the positively charged matrix-targeting sequence has been concluded
from several observations: studies with synthetic presequence peptides
indicated that the positively charged residues are driven in by the
electrical gradient (Roise and Schatz, 1988
; Roise, 1992
; de Kruijff,
1994
); the electrical component of the proton-motive force across the inner membrane is essential for protein import, while the
pH is
dispensable (Martin et al., 1991
); a matrix-targeting
sequence with a low positive net charge required a high 
for
import, while a matrix-targeting sequence with a high positive net
charge could be imported at a lower 
(Martin et al.,
1991
). 2) 
supports the dimerization of Tim23, a likely
prerequisite for the interaction of a matrix-targeting sequence with
the TIM23 complex (Bauer et al., 1996
).
The TIM23 complex does not only transport preproteins into the matrix.
A number of preproteins destined for the intermembrane space or inner
membrane are imported via this translocase (Bömer et
al., 1997
; Kurz et al., 1999
). These preproteins
contain an additional sorting sequence besides the matrix-targeting
sequence. The intermembrane space protein cytochrome
b2 represents a typical example. Its
preprotein carries a second cleavable segment, the sorting sequence,
which is located between the matrix-targeting signal and the mature
protein (Hurt and van Loon, 1986
; Hartl et al., 1987
; Glick
et al., 1992
; Koll et al., 1992
; Gärtner et al., 1995a
; Gruhler et al., 1995
). While the
matrix-targeting signal is directed into the matrix space and cleaved
off, the adjacent sorting sequence is arrested in the inner membrane
and prevents a complete translocation of the preprotein across the inner membrane. Subsequently, the inner membrane peptidase I (Pratje and Guiard, 1986
; Schneider et al., 1991
; Kalousek et
al., 1993
) cleaves off the sorting sequence and releases the
mature protein to the intermembrane space. A number of alterations of
the sorting sequence, such as partial deletions and amino acid
substitutions, have been described that inactivate its sorting function
and cause a complete translocation of the mutant cytochrome
b2 into the matrix (Koll et
al., 1992
; Beasley et al., 1993
; Schwarz et
al., 1993
; Voos et al., 1993
; Gärtner et
al., 1995a
; Merlin et al., 1997
; Bömer et
al., 1997
, 1998
).
In this report, we studied the import of mutant forms of the precursor
of cytochrome b2 and made the surprising
finding that a sequence beyond the matrix-targeting signal, i.e. the
sorting sequence, strongly influenced the 
-dependence of protein
import. We analyzed the properties of this 
-dependence and found
that it cannot be attributed to the two roles of 
known so far.
The sorting sequence contributes to the import driving mechanism in a
novel manner and thus modulates the effectiveness of 
action.
| |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Yeast Strains
Unless stated otherwise, the experiments in this study were
performed using mitochondria isolated from the Saccharomyces
cerevisiae wild-type strain PK82 (MAT
his4-713 lys2 ura3-52
trp1 leu2-3112) (Gambill et al., 1993
). For the experiments shown in Figure
6, the strains PK82 and PK83 (MAT
ade2-101 lys2
ura3-52 leu2-3112
trp1 ssc1-3(LEU2)) (Gambill
et al., 1993
), MB3-46 (MAT
ade2-101 his3-
200 leu2-
1 lys2-801
ura3::LYS2 tim23-2) (Dekker et al., 1993
),
and the corresponding wild-type strain MB3 (MAT
ade2-101 his3-
200 leu2-
1 lys2-801
ura3::LYS2) were used.
Construction of b2-Dihydrofolate Reductase Fusion Proteins
For in vitro transcription of
pb2(167)-dihydrofolate reductase (DHFR),
pb2(
47-65)-DHFR, and
pb2(K48I,R49C)-DHFR, pGEM4Z plasmids containing
the respective open reading frames were used (Rassow et al.,
1989
; Koll et al., 1992
; Bömer et al.,
1997
). To construct the other fusion proteins, oligonucleotide-directed
missense mutagenesis polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was used with the
following primers and templates: forward primer 5'-GTCGTTCGAACAAGACT
CGCAAAT-ATGCACACAGTCATG-3' and reverse primer 5'-CATGACTGTG
TGCATATTTGCGAGTCTTGTTCGAACGAC-3' on
pb2(K48I,R49C)-DHFR (Bömer et
al., 1997
) as a template to generate
pb2(QIC)-DHFR; forward primer 5'-
GTCATGGACTGCCTTGCAGGTCGGTGCAA-TTCTAG-3' and reverse primer 5'-
CTAGAATTGCACCGACCTGCAAGGCAGTCCATGAC-3' on
pb2(QIC)-DHFR as a template to generate
pb2(QIC-Q)-DHFR; forward primer 5'-CAAAAT
CCAAGTCG-TTCCAACAAAACTCAAGAAAACGCAC-3' and reverse primer 5'-GTGCGTTTTCTTGAGTTTTGTTGGAACGACTTGGATTTTG-3' on
pb2(167)-DHFR (Rassow et al., 1989
;
Voos et al., 1993
) as a template to generate pb2(E43Q,D45N)-DHFR; forward primer
5'-GTTCGAACAAGACTCAGTCGGTGCAATTCTAG-3` and reverse primer
5`-CTAGAATTGCACCGACTGAGTCTTGTTCGAAC-3` on
pb2(167)-DHFR to generate
pb2(
47-57)-DHFR. After the PCR reaction, the
template DNA was digested with DpnI. To construct
pb2(A63P)-DHFR, a PCR was performed on
pb2(167)-DHFR using
5'-GAATTGGATTTAGGTGACACTATA-3' as a forward primer and
5'-GAACTAGRAGCGGGTAGAATTGCACCG-3' as a reverse primer. The resulting
product was used as a forward primer in a subsequent PCR with
5'-CAAGCTCTAATACGACTCACTATA-3' as a reverse primer, using
pb2(167)-DHFR as a template. After digestion with DpnI, the product was cut with EcoRI and
MscI and was ligated into EcoRI- and
MscI-digested pb2(167)-DHFR. All
constructs were transformed into the Escherichia coli strain
XL-1 blue (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA). Formation of the correct products
was confirmed by DNA sequencing.
Import of Preproteins into Isolated Mitochondria
Mitochondria were isolated from yeast cells grown on YPG (1%
yeast extract, 2% bactopeptone, and 3% glycerol) according to published procedures (Daum et al., 1982
; Hartl et
al., 1987
; Kang et al., 1990
; Gambill et
al., 1993
), were resuspended in SEM buffer (250 mM sucrose,
1 mM EDTA, and 10 mM Mops-KOH, pH 7.2) to a concentration of 5 mg/ml,
and were stored at
80°C. Radiolabeled mitochondrial preproteins
were synthesized by in vitro translation in rabbit reticulocyte lysate
(Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, Uppsala, Sweden) in the presence of
[35S]methionine/cysteine after in vitro
transcription using SP6 polymerase (Stratagene) (Söllner et
al., 1991
).
For the in vitro import assay, mitochondria (25-50 µg of protein)
were diluted with import buffer (1% [wt/vol] fatty acid-free bovine
serum albumin [BSA], 250 mM sucrose, 80 mM KCl, 5 mM
MgCl2, 2 mM ATP, 2 mM NADH, and 10 mM Mops-KOH,
pH 7.2) to a final volume of 100 µl. The samples were preincubated
for 5 min at 25°C before the import reaction was started by adding
2-4 µl of reticulocyte lysate containing
35S-labeled preproteins. For the accumulation of
import intermediates, the import was performed in the presence of 5 µM of methotrexate (Sigma Chemical, St. Louis, MO) when indicated.
After incubation for 2.5-6 min at 25°C, the import reaction was
stopped by the addition of 1 µM valinomycin to dissipate the membrane
potential 
. The samples were treated with proteinase K (40 µg/ml) for 15 min, followed by the addition of 1 mM
phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride and incubation for 10 min on ice. The
mitochondria were subsequently reisolated, washed with SEM buffer, and
subjected to SDS-PAGE.
Carbonyl Cyanide m-Chlorophenylhydrzone Titration
The mitochondria were partially uncoupled by the addition of the
protonophore carbonyl cyanide m-chlorophenylhydrzone (CCCP) (Martin
et al., 1991
; Gärtner et al., 1995b
). CCCP
was added (from a stock solution concentrated 100-fold in
ethanol) before the preincubation at 25°C and before import.
All samples were made chemically identical by adding the corresponding
amount of solvent to the control samples. To prevent the generation of
an electrochemical potential by a reversed action of the
FoF1-ATPase, 20 µM
oligomycin was added to the import buffer.
Intramitochondrial Localization of Imported Proteins
To determine the localization of the imported proteins, import was performed as described above. After import, the samples were diluted with five volumes of EM buffer (1 mM EDTA, and 10 mM Mops-KOH, pH 7.2) to rupture the outer membrane by swelling. After 15 min of incubation on ice, five volumes of S500EM buffer (500 mM sucrose, 1 mM EDTA, and 10 mM Mops-KOH, pH 7.2), were added to reestablish the original osmotic conditions. For nonswelling conditions, the import mix was diluted twice with SEM buffer. Mitochondria of all samples were reisolated by centrifugation resuspended in 100 µl of SEM buffer, and proteinase K treatment was carried out as described above. After SDS-PAGE, blotting of the proteins to nitrocellulose membrane and subsequent immunodecoration with control antibodies were performed.
Coimmunoprecipitation
The interaction of imported protein with mtHsp70 was analyzed by
coimmunoprecipitation (Voisine et al., 1999
).
pb2(
47-65)-DHFR was imported into mitchondria
in the presence of different concentrations of CCCP for 5 min at
25°C. The mitochondria were reisolated, washed with SEM, and lysed in
buffer A (0.1% [vol/vol] Triton X-100, 100 mM NaCl, 10 mM Tris-HCl,
pH 7.4, 1 mM PMSF, and 5 mM EDTA). After a clarifying spin (16,000 × g for 5 min), the supernatants were transferred to
antibodies directed against mtHsp70 that were bound to protein-A
sepharose. The samples were incubated for 1 h at 4°C rotating
end-over-end. Subsequently, the protein-A sepharose beads were washed
three times in buffer A and once with 10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.4. Bound
proteins were eluted by the addition of SDS-sample buffer and were
analyzed by SDS-PAGE.
Assessment of the Mitochondrial Membrane Potential 
The membrane potential 
of isolated yeast mitochondria was
assessed by measuring the fluorescence quenching of the
potential-sensitive dye 3,3'-dipropylthiadicarbocyanine iodide
(DiSC3(5); Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR) as
described before (Sims et al., 1974
; Gärtner et
al., 1995b
). The measurements were performed using a Perkin Elmer-Cetus (Norwalk, CT) LS 50B luminescence spectrometer at 25°C,
with excitation at 622 nm, emission at 670 nm, and slits at 5 nm. The
measurements were carried out using a buffer containing 600 mM
sorbitol, 1% (wt/vol) BSA, 10 mM MgCl2, 0.5 mM
EDTA, and 20 mM KPi, pH 7.4. The following
reagents were successively added to 3 ml of the buffer and the change
in fluorescence was recorded: 3 µl of DiSC3(5)
(in ethanol; final concentration, 2 µM); 20 µl of mitochondria (in
SEM buffer; final concentration, 33 µg mitochondrial protein per
milliliter); and, finally, 3 µl of valinomycin (in ethanol; final
concentration, 1 µM) to dissipate 
. The difference in the
fluorescence before and after the addition of valinomycin represents a
relative assessment of the membrane potential.
Miscellaneous Methods
Standard techniques were used for SDS-PAGE, immunodecoration, and DNA manipulation. For the detection and quantitation of radiolabeled proteins, a storage phosphor imaging system with software (ImageQuant version 1.11, Molecular Dynamics, Sunnyvale, CA) was used.
| |
RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
A Deletion in the Sorting Sequence of Cytochrome b2
Causes a Higher 
-Dependence of Transport into Mitochondria
To modulate the magnitude of the mitochondrial membrane potential

under in vitro protein import conditions into isolated mitochondria, we used different concentrations of the protonophore CCCP
(Martin et al., 1991
; Nicholls and Ferguson, 1982
;
Gärtner et al., 1995b
; Bömer et al.,
1998
). Oligomycin was included to inhibit the
FoF1-ATPase to prevent the
generation of a membrane potential and the depletion of matrix ATP by a
reverse action of the ATPase. The membrane potential was assessed by
use of the fluorescent dye DiSC3(5) that is taken
up by mitochondria and thus quenched in a 
-dependent manner (Sims
et al., 1974
; Gärtner et al., 1995b
). The
decrease in fluorescence (which is reversed by a complete dissipation
of 
by the potassium ionophore valinomycin in the presence of
potassium in the medium) is used as an assessment for the magnitude of

(Figure 1A, top). By the addition
of increasing concentrations of CCCP, this fluorescence quenching was
gradually reduced until a complete dissipation was achieved (Figure 1A
[middle and bottom] and B).
|
b2-DHFR fusion proteins are widely used to study
mitochondrial protein import since they are efficiently synthesized and
radiolabeled in rabbit reticulocyte lysate and their intramitochondrial
processing and localization can be unambiguously determined (Hartl
et al., 1987
; Rassow et al., 1989
, 1990
; Koll
et al., 1992
; Beasley et al., 1993
; Glick
et al., 1993
; Schwarz et al., 1993
; Voos et
al., 1993
; Stuart et al., 1994
; Voisine et
al., 1999
). The 167 amino-terminal amino acid residues of
cytochrome b2 that were used as the basis for the preproteins of this study contain the complete targeting and
sorting information of the preprotein as follows: the matrix-targeting sequence (residues 1-31); the sorting sequence (residues 32-80); and
87 residues of the mature protein. Fused to the entire DHFR, the
resulting chimeric preprotein b2-DHFR (Figure 1C)
has been shown to be sorted to the intermembrane space like authentic
cytochrome b2 (Koll et al.,
1992
; Voos et al., 1993
) and will be referred to as the
wild-type preprotein in this study. b2-DHFR was
synthesized in rabbit reticulocyte lysates in the presence of
[35S]methionine/cysteine and was incubated with
isolated yeast mitochondria. Import was determined by monitoring the
processing of the preprotein to the intermediate- and mature-sized
forms and by protection against externally added protease (Figure 1D,
lane 1). On addition of increasing concentrations of CCCP, the import
of b2-DHFR was gradually inhibited (Figure 1D,
lanes 2-8). In the short import time that is required to be in the
kinetically linear import range (Söllner et al., 1991
;
Alconada et al., 1995
), the slow second processing step
generated only small amounts of the mature form. Since the

-dependent step of import takes place before the generation of
the intermediate-sized form by the matrix-processing peptidase (Schatz,
1996
; Neupert, 1997
; Pfanner et al., 1997
), the sum of protease-protected intermediate- and mature-sized forms was used for
the quantitation of import (Figure 1E).
The deletion of a 19-residue segment in the sorting sequence of
b2-DHFR generates the preprotein
b2(
47-65)-DHFR, which is sorted into the
matrix space and cleaved to the intermediate-sized form (Koll et
al., 1992
; Voos et al., 1993
; Voisine et
al., 1999
). b2(
47-65)-DHFR was
efficiently imported into yeast mitochondria in the absence of CCCP
(Figure 1D, lane 9) yet was inhibited strongly by the addition of CCCP
(Figure 1D, lanes 10-16). A quantitative analysis of the inhibitory
effect of CCCP on the import of b2-DHFR and
b2(
47-65)-DHFR revealed a striking difference
(Figure 1E, left panel), indicating that the import of
b2(
47-65)-DHFR was significantly more
sensitive to a reduction of the mitochondrial membrane potential than
that of b2-DHFR.
For comparison, we imported the following two preproteins that were
reported to depend differentially on 
: the
-subunit of the
F1-ATPase (F1
) and a
fusion protein between the presequence of
Fo-ATPase subunit 9 and DHFR (Su9-DHFR) (Martin
et al., 1991
). The import of F1
was
strongly inhibited by the addition of CCCP (Figure 1D, lanes 25-32),
while the import of Su9-DHFR showed a higher resistance to CCCP (Figure
1D, lanes 17-24). The quantitation indicated that the CCCP sensitivity
of the import of b2(
47-65)-DHFR was
comparable to that of F1
, while that of
b2-DHFR was more related to that of Su9-DHFR
(Figure 1E). We conclude that the import of
b2-DHFR and of
b2(
47-65)-DHFR show a differential

-dependence. The difference is roughly related to that observed
for the import of Su9-DHFR and F1
. However,
Su9-DHFR and F1
possess quite different matrix-targeting sequences, whereas b2-DHFR and
b2(
47-65)-DHFR possess the identical
matrix-targeting sequence. In the following chapters, we thus asked if
characteristics of the sorting sequence of the
b2-fusion proteins were responsible for the
differential 
-dependence.
A Differential 
-Dependence of b2-DHFR Preproteins
with the Same Intramitochondrial Destination
b2-DHFR is transported to the intermembrane
space, whereas b2(
47-65)-DHFR is completely
imported into the matrix (Koll et al., 1992
; Voos et
al., 1993
) as demonstrated here by the differential protease
accessibility after opening of the mitochondrial outer membrane by
swelling (i.e., formation of mitoplasts). A major fraction of imported
b2-DHFR was sensitive to proteinase K like the
intermembrane space-exposed portions of the marker protein ADP/ATP
carrier (Figure 2A, lane 2, columns 3 and
5), while b2(
47-65)-DHFR was mainly protected
against the protease, which is comparable to the matrix marker
mitochondrial GrpE (Mge1) (Figure 2A, lane 2, columns 4 and 6). After
lysis of the mitochondrial membranes with detergent, both
b2-DHFR fusion proteins as well as the marker proteins were fully accessible to and degraded by proteinase K (Gärtner et al., 1995a
; data not shown), excluding an
endogenous protease resistance of the proteins as explanation for the
different protease protection.
|
We asked whether a lowering of the membrane potential altered the
intramitochondrial sorting of the b2-fusion
proteins. The preproteins were imported at different concentrations of
CCCP, and half of each sample was subjected to swelling. Both the i- and m-form of b2-DHFR were largely degraded by
added proteinase K (Figure 2B, lower panel, lanes 1-4), whereas
i-b2(
47-65)-DHFR was mainly protected against
the protease (Figure 2B, lower panel, lanes 5-8). A quantitative
analysis demonstrated that the intramitochondrial locations of
b2-DHFR and
b2(
47-65)-DHFR were not affected by the
addition of CCCP to the import reaction (Figure 2C). (A second processing to i* that was observed for a small amount of
b2(
47-65)-DHFR [Figure 2B] has been
reported for a number of matrix-targeted preproteins and is apparently
mediated by the matrix-localized mitochondrial intermediate peptidase
[Isaya et al., 1991
; Kalousek et al., 1993
;
Schwarz et al., 1993
]. In all experiments, the

-dependence of formation of the i*-form correlated with that of
formation of the i-form, and thus our quantitations included both
forms.)
Does the transport of b2-fusion proteins into the
matrix require a higher membrane potential than the transport into the
intermembrane space? An exchange of two basic amino acid residues
(lysine 48 and arginine 49) of the sorting sequence by neutral amino
acids impaired the sorting function and caused transport of the mutant preprotein into the matrix (Schwarz et al., 1993
;
Bömer et al., 1997
). We synthesized
b2(K48I,R49C)-DHFR and imported it into mitochondria. Figure 3A demonstrates that
the imported fusion protein was protected against protease added to
mitoplasts like the matrix marker Mge1 (columns 1 and 3) and thus
transported into the matrix space. Then the CCCP sensitivity for the
import of b2(K48I,R49C)-DHFR was determined
(Figure 3B). The import of b2(K48I,R49C)-DHFR was
significantly more resistant to CCCP than that of
b2(
47-65)-DHFR yet was similar to that of
b2-DHFR (Figure 3C). Thus,
b2(K48I,R49C)-DHFR and
b2-DHFR show a similar 
-dependence, although their sorting pathways are different. In contrast,
b2(
47-65)-DHFR and
b2(K48I,R49C)-DHFR are both translocated into the
matrix but have a strikingly different 
-dependence.
|
These results lead to two related conclusions. First, lowering of

during import does not alter the intramitochondrial sorting of
b2-fusion proteins. Second, a differential

-dependence of import of b2-fusion proteins
cannot be explained by a different intramitochondrial destination
(matrix or intermembrane space). Taken together, these results indicate
that the sorting pathway of b2-fusion proteins is
not a critical determinant for the 
-dependence of import.
The Content of Charged Residues in the Sorting Sequence Is Not
Critical for the 
-Dependence of Protein Import
The entire presequence of b2-DHFR contains a
net positive charge of 10 (i.e., +7 for the matrix-targeting sequence
and +3 for the sorting sequence) (Guiard, 1985
). In
b2(
47-65)-DHFR, a segment containing four
positively charged residues has been deleted, leading to a net charge
of the sorting sequence of
1 (Figure
4A) (Koll et al., 1992
). The
two classic preproteins that have been shown to differentially depend
on a 
for import, Su9-DHFR and F1
(see
Figure 1, D and E) (Martin et al., 1991
), differ in the net
charge of their presequences from +12 to +6 (Figure 4A, right panel).
It was thus conceivable that a difference in the net positive charge of
b2-fusion proteins was responsible for the
differential 
-dependence.
|
To test this, three or four positively charged residues in the sorting
sequence were replaced by uncharged amino acid residues, leading to the
fusion proteins b2(QIC)-DHFR and
b2(QIC-Q)-DHFR with net charges of the sorting
sequence of 0 or
1, respectively (Figure 4A). These preproteins were
imported into mitochondria at different concentrations of CCCP (Figure
4B, lanes 1-16). Surprisingly, the import of the preproteins revealed
a similar sensitivity to a decrease of the membrane potential as that
of the wild-type presequence of b2-DHFR but was
clearly different from that of b2(
47-65)-DHFR
(Figure 4B, left panel and middle panel). In particular, b2(QIC-Q)-DHFR contains the identical charged
residues as b2(
47-65)-DHFR throughout the
entire preprotein but shows a much lower 
-dependence (Figure 4B,
middle panel). Moreover, the replacement of two negatively charged
residues of the sorting sequence by uncharged ones generated the
preprotein b2(E43Q,D45N)-DHFR with a higher net
charge than the wild-type sorting sequence (i.e., +5) (Figure 4A). The
import of b2(E43Q,D45N)-DHFR again revealed a

-dependence that was similar to b2-DHFR
(Figure 4B, lanes 17-24, right panel). These results demonstrate that
the 
-dependence of import is independent of the net charge of the
b2 sorting sequence.
The wild-type b2-DHFR and the constructs
b2(K48I,R49C)-DHFR,
b2(QIC)-DHFR, and
b2(QIC-Q)-DHFR, which share a similar

-dependence (Figures 3C and 4B), all harbor an uncharged segment
(residues 58-65) that is lacking in
b2(
47-65)-DHFR. We asked whether a lack of
this segment was responsible for the high 
-dependence of
b2(
47-65)-DHFR. Thus, we constructed the
fusion protein b2(
47-57)-DHFR that only
lacked the segment containing the four positively charged residues
(Figure 5A). The preprotein was imported
into mitochondria in the presence of different concentrations of CCCP
(Figure 5B). The import of b2(
47-57)-DHFR
showed a high sensitivity toward the lowering of the membrane potential
that was close to that of b2(
47-65)-DHFR
(Figure 5C). (Although the difference of the 
-dependence of
b2(
47-57)-DHFR compared with
b2(
47-65)-DHFR was statistically significant,
the difference was rather small when compared with the

-dependence of b2-DHFR [Figure 5C].) This
result suggests that a lack of this uncharged segment is not the main
determinant for the strong difference in 
-dependence of import
observed between the wild-type preprotein and
b2(
47-65)-DHFR.
|
The Differential 
-Dependence Is Not Attributable to the
Dependence on mtHsp70 or Tim23
We asked whether the differential 
-dependence of
b2-fusion proteins could be explained by the
requirement for the second import driving force, mtHsp70, or the
dependence on the function of Tim23. We used the preproteins
b2-DHFR,
b2(
47-65)-DHFR, and b2(QIC)-DHFR to address this problem. In the
yeast mutant ssc1-3, mtHsp70 carries an amino acid exchange
in the ATPase domain that strongly inhibits its function (Gambill
et al., 1993
; Voos et al., 1993
, 1996
).
The isolated mitochondria were preincubated at 37°C to induce the
mutant phenotype. The import of
b2(
47-65)-DHFR and
b2(QIC)-DHFR was strongly inhibited in the mutant
mitochondria (Figure 6A, middle panel and
lower panel, lanes 3 and 4), while the import of
b2-DHFR was only partially reduced (Figure 6A,
upper panel, lanes 3 and 4). Therefore, the requirement for mtHps70 does not correlate with the 
-dependence, since
b2-DHFR and b2(QIC)-DHFR have a similar low 
-dependence while
b2(
47-65)-DHFR has a strong 
-dependence. The dependence on Tim23 function was analyzed with tim23-2 mutant mitochondria in which the oligomerization of
the TIM23 translocase is destabilized and, thus, the transport
efficiency of preproteins is reduced (Dekker et al.,
1997
; Bömer et al., 1997
). All three
b2-fusion proteins were inhibited in import into tim23-2 mitochondria by ~60-70% compared with wild-type
mitochondria (Figure 6B). In particular, no significant difference of
b2(
47-65)-DHFR compared with
b2-DHFR or b2(QIC)-DHFR was
recognizable, indicating that the differential 
-dependence cannot
be attributed to a different requirement for Tim23.
|
A b2-DHFR Construct That Is Less Dependent on 
Than the Wild-Type Version
The results obtained so far have suggested a novel characteristic
of the membrane potential-driven import of preproteins, which depends
on properties of the sorting sequence in a charge-independent manner.
We wondered whether further independent evidence for this novel role of

could be obtained. Beasley et al. (1993)
had selected
a number of mutations in the preprotein of cytochrome b2. We asked whether the mutation of an
uncharged residue to another uncharged residue in the sorting sequence
of cytochrome b2 would influence the

-dependence of import. The residues in the segment deleted in
b2(
47-65)-DHFR seemed to be of particular
importance to us.
Finally, we found a single mutation, a substitution of alanine 63 by
proline, that generated a preprotein with a remarkable 
-dependence. b2(A63P)-DHFR was targeted to
the matrix space since it remained protease-protected in mitoplasts
like the matrix marker Mge1 (Figure 7A,
lane 2, columns 3 and 5) (Beasley et al., 1993
). When the
sensitivity of import to CCCP was analyzed,
b2(A63P)-DHFR showed a higher resistance than any
preprotein tested before (Figure 7B, lanes 1-8, quantitation). CCCP
concentrations up to 30 µM that lead to a clear reduction of 
(see Figure 1B) did not inhibit the import of
b2(A63P)-DHFR but actually led to a slight
stimulation (Figure 7B, panel on the right). The import of
b2(A63P)-DHFR was only inhibited at higher
concentrations of CCCP. Therefore, b2(A63P)-DHFR requires less 
for import than the wild-type presequence of b2-DHFR, proving that uncharged residues in the
b2 sorting sequence can play a critical role in
the membrane potential-dependence of import.
|
In Figure 7C, we compared the b2-fusion proteins
used in this study. First, all preproteins required a membrane
potential for import since a complete dissipation of 
by the
addition of valinomycin (in the presence of potassium in the import
buffer) blocked the import of each protein (Figure 7C, even-numbered
columns). Second, roughly three classes of preproteins can be
distinguished when an intermediate level of 
is generated by the
addition of CCCP (shown are the import results at 30 µM CCCP) (Figure
7C, odd-numbered columns): (1) A series of constructs with a different number of charged residues in the sorting sequence (Figure 7C, columns
5, 7, 9, and 11) show a 
-dependence that is roughly similar to
that of b2-DHFR with the wild-type presequence
(Figure 7C, column 3); (2) b2(
47-65)-DHFR and
b2(
47-57)-DHFR reveal a much stronger

-dependence (Figure 7C, columns 13 and 15); while (3)
b2(A63P)-DHFR still can be efficiently imported
at a low 
(Figure 7C, column 1).
Early Function of the Sorting Sequence for Translocation of the Matrix-targeting Sequence
The experiments described so far have analyzed the influence of
the sorting sequence on the entire import process, since the processed
forms of the fusion proteins protected against externally added
proteinase K were quantified. We asked whether the sorting sequence
already had affected the early import stage of translocation of the
matrix-targeting sequence or whether the sorting sequence functioned
only in a later stage by promoting the translocation of
carboxy-terminal parts of the presequence and the mature protein parts.
In the latter case, the translocation of the matrix-targeting sequence
of b2(
47-65)-DHFR should have a lower

-dependence than the translocation of the entire fusion protein.
Therefore, we analyzed the efficiency of processing of
b2(
47-65)-DHFR, i.e., the removal of the
matrix-targeting sequence by the matrix-processing peptidase, without
treating the mitochondria with proteinase K (Figure
8A, lanes 1-8). A direct comparison with
the protease protection of the processed protein, however, did not
reveal a difference (Figure 8, A, lanes 9-16, and B, left panel). The

-dependence of the formation of
i-b2(
47-65)-DHFR was indistinguishable from that of translocation of the entire protein to a protease-protected location (Figure 8B, left panel). With both
b2(K48I,R49C)-DHFR and
b2(A63P)-DHFR, which are imported into the matrix
like b2(
47-65)-DHFR, the translocation of the
matrix-targeting sequence to the matrix-processing peptidase showed a
lower 
-dependence than that of
b2(
47-65)-DHFR (Figure 8B); however, the

-dependence was not lower than that of the complete import of the
respective protein (Figure 8B, middle panel and right panel). These
results suggested that the sorting sequence influenced the

-dependence at a very early import stage.
|
To obtain independent evidence, we probed the accessibility of the
preprotein to matrix Hsp70. mtHsp70 can bind to the matrix-targeting sequence as soon as it emerges on the matrix side of the inner membrane
import channel, even when the processing site has not yet been exposed
to the matrix (Ungermann et al., 1994
). Thereby, the very
first stage of translocation of the matrix-targeting signal into the
matrix can be analyzed. b2(
47-65)-DHFR was
imported at different concentrations of CCCP. Mitochondria were lysed
with nonionic detergent, and the association of the fusion protein with
mtHsp70 was determined by coimmunoprecipitation. In the absence of
CCCP, ~2.5% of processed b2(
47-65)-DHFR
was recovered together with mtHsp70 (Figure 8C, column 2); this
represents a typical yield for the coimmunoprecipitation (including
several washing steps) of accumulated substrate with mtHsp70 (Ungermann
et al., 1994
; Voisine et al., 1999
). In the
presence of CCCP, the processing of
b2(
47-65)-DHFR (Figure 8C, upper panel,
columns 4 and 6) as well as the coprecipitation of
i-b2(
47-65)-DHFR decreased (Figure 8C, lower
panel, columns 4 and 6). The amount of the precursor form of
b2(
47-65)-DHFR associated with mitochondria
increased in the presence of CCCP (Figure 8C, upper panel, columns 3 and 5 versus column 1); however, coprecipitation of the precursor form
with antimtHsp70 remained at a very low level under all conditions and
was not increased at low 
(Figure 8C, lower panel, columns 1, 3 and 5), indicating that the precursor form was not accessible for
binding to mtHsp70. Together with the protease sensitivity of the
precursor form (Figure 8A), this result shows that the precursor form
is located on the mitochondrial surface and has not yet entered the
matrix space. The coprecipitation of
b2(
47-65)-DHFR with anti-mtHsp70 thus
confirms the result obtained with the processing assay that the initial
translocation of the amino-terminal portion of the preprotein across
the inner membrane shows a strong sensitivity to CCCP like the
translocation of the complete protein. We conclude that the deletion in
the sorting sequence of b2(
47-65)-DHFR
already affects the 
-dependence of translocation of the
matrix-targeting sequence across the inner membrane.
The specific ligand methotrexate (MTX) stabilizes the DHFR moiety
of the cytochrome b2 fusion proteins and,
thus, arrests the importing protein after the first step of
translocation in a processed state, with the folded DHFR still outside
the mitochondria (Eilers and Schatz, 1986
; Rassow et al.,
1989
). The preproteins of b2(
47-65)-DHFR,
b2(K48I,R49C)-DHFR, and
b2(A63P)-DHFR were imported in the presence of
MTX and different concentrations of CCCP (Figure 8D). The efficiency of
translocation arrest was demonstrated by the accessibility of the
intermediates to proteinase K (not shown). A quantification of the
processing efficiency revealed that the 
-dependence of the
constructs significantly differed (Figure 8E), as was observed for the
translocation of the entire proteins; i.e.,
b2(A63P)-DHFR showed the lowest

-dependence, and b2(
47-65)-DHFR showed
the highest 
-dependence (compare Figure 8E to 7C). We conclude
that the sorting sequence of cytochrome b2
contributes to the 
-dependence of import at an early stage when
the major portion of the mature protein is still outside the mitochondrion.
| |
DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The membrane potential 
is essential for the transport of
preproteins into or across the mitochondrial inner membrane. We report
that the sorting sequence of a cleavable preprotein strongly influences
the requirement for 
. All cytochrome
b2 fusion proteins used here contain the
identical matrix-targeting sequence and the identical mature protein
part, and differences were only introduced in the sorting sequence in
the form of deletions or of amino acid substitutions. All
b2-fusion proteins were efficiently imported into
fully energized mitochondria (i.e., at a high 
) and were blocked
fully in transport across the inner membrane upon a complete dissipation of 
. However, significant differences in import efficiency became apparent when the magnitude of the membrane potential
was gradually lowered by the protonophore CCCP. Since the sorting
sequence determines the intramitochondrial sorting of
b2-fusion proteins to the intermembrane space or
matrix, an obvious assumption was that a differential 
-dependence
would be related to the sorting pathway of the preproteins. However, we
found that the 
-dependence was independent of the
intramitochondrial destination, and, in particular, matrix-targeted
b2-fusion proteins with both a high and a low

-dependence were found.
It has to be emphasized that CCCP selectively inhibits the

-dependent step of protein import and does not unspecifically impair the import competence of preproteins or mitochondrial function for the following reasons. In the presence of high concentrations of
CCCP, preproteins still specifically interact with the TOM machinery of
the outer membrane (Hines and Schatz, 1993
; Haucke et al.,
1995
; Ryan et al., 1999
). The import block by CCCP can be
reversed by the removal of CCCP, and, thus, arrested preproteins can be
imported completely (Hines and Schatz, 1993
; Haucke et al.,
1995
; Ryan et al., 1999
). The induction of a potassium
diffusion potential (by valinomycin in the presence of low potassium in the medium) abolishes the dissipation of 
by CCCP and allows import of preproteins, even in the presence of high concentrations of
CCCP (Pfanner and Neupert, 1985
; Martin et al., 1991
).
The differential 
-dependence of the
b2-fusion proteins was not attributable to a
differential dependence on the function of mtHsp70. The
intramitochondrial sorting pathway of b2-fusion proteins is critical for the requirement for mtHsp70, since
matrix-targeted preproteins, but not intermembrane space-targeted
preproteins, strongly depend on the chaperone (Voos et al.,
1993
; Stuart et al., 1994
; Gärtner et al.,
1995a
), while the 
-dependence is independent of the sorting
pathway. Moreover, preproteins with a low and a high 
-dependence
showed the same requirement for Tim23 function. In fact, the modulatory
effect of the sorting sequence on the 
-dependence of protein
import was much stronger than the effect of 
on Tim23
dimerization (Figure 7C) (Bauer et al., 1996
), excluding the
fact that the effect of the sorting sequence on the 
-dependence
was mediated by Tim23.
b2(
47-65)-DHFR that strongly depends on

lacks four positively charged residues compared with the
wild-type sorting sequence of b2-DHFR with a
lower 
-dependence, raising the possibility that the membrane
potential exerted an electrophoretic effect not only on the
matrix-targeting sequence, but also on the sorting sequence. Thus, we
constructed a series of b2-fusion proteins in
which positively or negatively charged residues of the sorting sequence
were replaced by neutral residues. Surprisingly, however, no
differences in the responses to the membrane potential were observed,
although the difference in net charge of the sorting sequence was up to
6 among different fusion proteins. These results indicate that
the sorting sequence of cytochrome b2
influences the requirement for a 
in a novel manner that is
independent of the net charge of the sorting sequence.
As the deleted segment of b2(
47-65)-DHFR not
only contained charged residues but also an uncharged stretch, we
reinserted this segment in a further construct, but the

-dependence did not change substantially. Since neither the
charge nor the length of the hydrophobic segment of the sorting
sequence seems to be crucial, it is unlikely that the simple
physicochemical properties of this segment are critical for the
differential 
-dependence, raising the possibility that more
complex structural properties of the sorting sequence are important.
Evidence for this hypothesis was obtained by constructing a
b2-fusion protein that showed a lower
