![]() |
|
|
Vol. 11, Issue 4, 1345-1356, April 2000


§
and
*The Physiological Laboratory, University of Liverpool, Liverpool
L69 3BX, United Kingdom; and
Department of Biomedical
Sciences, University of Edinburgh Medical School, Edinburgh, EH8 9XD,
United Kingdom
| |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
An evolutionarily ancient mechanism is used for intracellular
membrane fusion events ranging from endoplasmic reticulum-Golgi traffic in yeast to synaptic vesicle exocytosis in the human brain. At
the heart of this mechanism is the core complex of
N-ethylmaleimide-sensitive fusion protein (NSF), soluble
NSF attachment proteins (SNAPs), and SNAP receptors (SNAREs). Although
these proteins are accepted as key players in vesicular traffic, their
molecular mechanisms of action remain unclear. To illuminate important
structure-function relationships in NSF, a screen for dominant
negative mutants of yeast NSF (Sec18p) was undertaken. This involved
random mutagenesis of a GAL1-regulated
SEC18 yeast expression plasmid. Several dominant negative alleles were identified on the basis of galactose-inducible growth arrest, of which one, sec18-109,
was characterized in detail. The
sec18-109 phenotype (abnormal membrane trafficking
through the biosynthetic pathway, accumulation of a membranous tubular network, growth suppression, increased cell density) is due to a single
A-G substitution in SEC18 resulting in a missense
mutation in Sec18p (Thr394
Pro). Thr394 is
conserved in most AAA proteins and indeed forms part of the minimal AAA
consensus sequence that serves as a signature of this large protein
family. Analysis of recombinant Sec18-109p indicates that the mutation
does not prevent hexamerization or interaction with yeast
-SNAP
(Sec17p), but instead results in undetectable ATPase activity that
cannot be stimulated by Sec17p. This suggests a role for the AAA
protein consensus sequence in regulating ATP hydrolysis. Furthermore, this approach of screening for dominant negative mutants in yeast can
be applied to other conserved proteins so as to highlight important
functional domains in their mammalian counterparts.
| |
INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
A major recent development in cell biology is the realization that
fundamental cellular processes are controlled by similar mechanisms in
all eukaryotes. An excellent example of this is intracellular membrane
traffic. Yeast genetics (Pryer et al., 1992
), in vitro
biochemistry (Rothman, 1994
), and molecular cloning (Sudhof, 1995
) have
converged to indicate that vesicle formation and consumption are
governed by the same ubiquitous protein machinery (Ferro-Novick and
Jahn, 1994
). An early clue that this might be the case was provided
when the gene encoding N-ethylmaleimide-sensitive fusion
protein (NSF), the first protein identified as being required for
reconstituted mammalian intracellular membrane fusion (Block et
al., 1988
), was cloned. It was observed (Wilson et al.,
1989
) that NSF displayed both sequence and functional homology to
Sec18p, a protein required for endoplasmic reticulum (ER) to Golgi
transport in yeast (Eakle et al., 1988
). NSF and Sec18p are
ATPases required for interorganelle transport at multiple stages of the
biosynthetic and endocytic pathways (Graham and Emr, 1991
; Rothman,
1994
). Furthermore, NSF and Sec18p form a 20 S complex with
soluble NSF attachment proteins (SNAPs; Sec17p in yeast) and SNAP
receptors (SNAREs), and abundant evidence suggests that these proteins
are also required for most intracellular membrane trafficking events (Woodman, 1997
). Taken together, this strongly suggests that NSF and
Sec18p are orthologues that function at the heart of a universal mechanism of membrane fusion.
Although the importance of NSF is unquestioned, the precise role of
this key protein in the membrane fusion process has been intensely
debated (Morgan and Burgoyne, 1995
; Woodman, 1997
). Suggestions for its
function range from a chaperone (Morgan and Burgoyne, 1995
) that acts
either at an early predocking priming stage to enable subsequent
docking/fusion (Mayer et al., 1996
) or at a postfusion stage
to recycle used SNARE complexes (Littleton et al., 1998
;
Weber et al., 1998
), through to a membrane fusogen (Otter-Nilsson et al., 1999
). For many proteins, mutational
studies, in particular the generation and analysis of dominant-acting
mutants, have been invaluable in gaining insight into their cellular
and molecular functions (Herskowitz, 1987
; Feig, 1999
). However,
because of its large size and essential multidomain structure
(Whiteheart et al., 1994
), NSF is not well suited to
structure-function studies using conventional
deletion/alanine-scanning mutagenesis. Indeed, the only published
mutagenic analyses of NSF/Sec18p have targeted residues in the Walker A
and B boxes known to be required for ATP binding or hydrolysis (Sumida
et al., 1994
; Whiteheart et al., 1994
; Nagiec
et al., 1995
; Colombo et al., 1996
; Matveeva et al., 1997
; Steel and Morgan, 1998
; Steel et
al., 1999
). Although these studies have emphasized the critical
requirement for D1 domain ATPase activity, the function of regions
beyond the Walker boxes has not been examined.
To redress this situation and shed light on important functional amino
acids in NSF, we took advantage of its orthology with Sec18p. We
reasoned that dominant negative mutants of SEC18 (i.e., genes encoding mutant polypeptides that disrupt the function of the
wild-type gene product in the cell [Herskowitz, 1987
]) might represent generally useful tools. We therefore used random mutagenic approaches using the Saccharomyces cerevisiae SEC18 gene and
screened for dominant negative mutations active in vivo. Because Sec18p and NSF are members of the ATPases associated with a variety of cellular activities (AAA) protein family (Confalonieri and Duguet, 1995
), any mutants that were isolated could potentially also provide information on this large, evolutionarily conserved family. Here we describe the strategies used and the isolation and characterization of one such dominant inhibitory mutant: sec18-109.
| |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Materials
Affinity-purified anti-Sec18p antiserum was a generous gift from Dr. A. Haas (Lehrstuhl fur Mikrobiologie, University of Wurzburg, Germany). Monoclonal anticarboxypeptidase Y antibody was a generous gift from Dr. T. Stevens (University of Oregon, Eugene, OR). The pSEY8 plasmid was a generous gift from Dr. S. Emr (University of California, San Diego, CA). The sec18-1 yeast strains, HMSF176 and RSY271, were generous gifts from Dr. R. Schekman (University of California, Berkeley, CA). INVSc1 cells, pYES2 vectors, and yeast transformation kits were purchased from Invitrogen (Groningen, The Netherlands); pQE vectors and nitrilotriacetic acid agarose were purchased from Qiagen (Dorking, UK). Unless specified otherwise, all other reagents were of analytical grade and obtained from Sigma (Poole, UK).
Yeast Strains
JRY188 (MAT
; leu2-3, 112;
ura3-52; trp1; his4; sir3;
rme) was used for generation and analysis of dominant
negative SEC18 alleles. This strain was crossed with HMSF176
to create the temperature-sensitive sec18-1 strain, CHY01
(MAT
; leu2-3, 112; trp1;
his4; sec18-1), used to score mutagenic
efficiency and for morphological analysis. The pep4 strain,
BJ5464 (MAT
; ura3-52; leu2
1;
trp1; prb1
1.6R; can1;
his3
200; pep4::HIS3), was used to
calibrate carboxypeptidase Y (CPY) processing. The diploid INVSc1
strain (leu2; ura3-52; trp1-289;
his3
1) was used for expression of epitope-tagged
SEC18 constructs. RSY271 (MATa;
ura3-52; his4; sec18-1) was used for
assessment of dominant lethality using pSEY8-derived plasmids.
Plasmids
A 685-bp EcoRI/BamHI fragment containing
the GAL1/GAL10 divergent promoter was excised from pBM150
and ligated into the corresponding sites in YCplac22 (Gietz and Sugino,
1988
) to produce the centromeric, inducible yeast expression vector,
YCpGAL. The wild-type SEC18 gene was then excised from pSEY8
(Eakle et al., 1988
) as a 3-kbp BamHI/HindIII fragment and ligated into the same
sites in YCpGAL to create YCpGAL-SEC18. The pYES2 plasmid
carrying His6-V5 epitope-tagged SEC18
was obtained from Invitrogen. The bacterial expression plasmids encoding His6-tagged Sec18p and Sec17p have been
described previously (Steel et al., 1999
).
Mutagenesis
Random mutagenesis using PCR
PCR mutagenesis uses suboptimal
cation and nucleotide conditions for Taq polymerase,
thus decreasing the fidelity of replication (Muhlrad et
al., 1992
). For this strategy, the oligonucleotides 5'-GCTCACTCATTAGGCACC-3' and 5'-CCGCACAGATGCGTAA-3' were used to anneal
to YCpGAL-SEC18 and produce a PCR product of ~4.1 kbp containing the GAL-SEC18 cassette. After first
optimizing the MgCl2 concentration, a ratio of either 8:1
or 12:1 of Mg2+ to Mn2+ ions, respectively, was
used in the PCR reaction to induce mutations. The YCpGAL vector was
then digested with BamHI and HindIII and cotransformed along with the PCR products into JRY188 cells. This resulted in the insertion of the PCR products into the gapped plasmid
by homologous recombination in vivo and allowed direct screening for
mutants within the yeast strain.
Random mutagenesis using mutD Escherichia coli
The
rifampicin-resistant mutD strain of E.
coli contains a mutant
subunit of DNA polymerase III,
resulting in a deficient DNA proofreading ability (Echols et
al., 1983
). This strain was transformed with
YCpGAL-SEC18, and the resulting pool of mutagenized plasmids was recovered using standard DNA procedures (Sambrook et al., 1989
) and used to transform JRY188 yeast cells.
Site-directed mutagenesis For epitope-tagging studies in yeast, the sec18-109 mutation was introduced into pYES2-SEC18 using the "Quickchange"' site directed mutagenesis kit (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA). The mutagenic primers that were used were as follows: sense 5'-GGTTATTGGTATGCCCAATCGTAAAGATCTAATAGACAGTGC-3', antisense 5'-GCACTGTCTATTAGATCTTTACGATTGGGCATACCAATAACC-3'. For assessment of dominant lethality using the pSEY8 plasmid (hereafter referred to as pSEY8-SEC18), the same approach and primers were used to create pSEY8-sec18-109, whereas pSEY8-sec18E350Q was generated using the following primers: sense 5'-CATATTATTATTTTCGATCAGCTGGATTCTG-3', antisense 5'-CAGAATCCAGCTGATCGAA-AATAATAATATG-3'. For bacterial expression of recombinant His6-tagged Sec18-109p, the coding sequence was PCR amplified from YCpGAL-sec18-109 and ligated into the BamHI and HindIII sites of pQE-30 (Qiagen). All constructs were checked by either manual or automated DNA sequencing (Oswel, Southampton, UK).
Isolation of Dominant Negative Mutants
JRY188 cells transformed directly by the PCR mutagenesis
approach, or indirectly with a mutD-mutagenized
YCpGAL-SEC18 preparation, were plated onto minimal media
supplemented with 3% glucose at 25°C. These were then replica-plated
onto media containing either glucose or galactose (3%). Plasmids were
recovered from five colonies exhibiting galactose-sensitive growth, and
the mutant SEC18 genes were subcloned as
BamHI/HindIII fragments back into the YCpGAL vector, before the dominant negative phenotype was rechecked by transforming fresh JRY188 cells. Mutations in the
confirmed dominant negative alleles were identified by manual
sequencing.
|
Density Shift Analysis
JRY188 yeast cells transformed with either YCpGAL-SEC18 or YCpGAL-sec18-109 were inoculated into 10 ml minimal media supplemented with raffinose (3%) and grown overnight at 25°C until the OD600 reached 0.2. The cultures were then split into two 5-ml cultures, and galactose was added to one culture to a final concentration of 3%. These cultures were grown for a further 5 h at 25°C, at which point the cells were pelleted by centrifugation, resuspended in 500 µl of 10% Percoll in TE buffer (10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.4, 1 mM EDTA) and fractionated on a 20-100% Percoll/TE buffer continuous gradient (10 ml). The gradients were centrifuged at 2000 × g for 10 min at room temperature, and the OD600 of 0.5-ml fractions was measured.
Analysis of CPY Processing
Untransformed JRY188 and BJ5464 cells and JRY188 cells
transformed with either YCpGAL-SEC18 or
YCpGAL-sec18-109 were inoculated into 50 ml minimal media
supplemented with glucose (2%) and grown overnight at 30°C until the
OD600 reached 0.5. Cells were harvested, washed
with water, and resuspended in minimal media supplemented with 2%
galactose and incubated further. Cells were then spheroplasted by
incubation in lyticase solution (500 U/ml lyticase in 1 M sorbitol, 14 mM
-mercaptoethanol, 0.1 M EDTA, pH 8), resuspended in Laemmli buffer, and boiled before they were loaded onto 10% polyacrylamide gels and transferred onto nitrocellulose. CPY was visualized after immunoblotting using a monoclonal CPY antibody and
enhanced chemiluminescence (ECL) detection. The position of p2 CPY was
established by comparing the mobility of a pep4 strain,
BJ5464, on the same gel (pep4 strains are deficient in
proteinase B and therefore cannot cleave the p2 form into mature CPY).
-Lactamase Secretion Assay
JRY188 cells were cotransformed with pYJS50, a plasmid carrying
a prepro-
-factor/
-lactamase fusion gene under the control of the
-factor promoter, and either YCpGAL-SEC18 or
YCpGAL-sec18-109. Cotransformants were inoculated into 200 ml minimal media supplemented with glycerol/ethanol (3%) and grown at
25°C until the OD600 reached ~0.2. After
2 h of growth at 25°C, galactose was added to 3%, and the
cultures were grown further. Duplicate 5-ml samples were removed at
intervals, and low-speed supernatants were prepared from glass bead
homogenates.
-Lactamase activity was assayed spectrophotometrically
by adding 50 µl of sample to 950 µl nitrocefin solution (0.5 mg/ml
nitrocefin in 100 mM sodium phosphate, pH 7) and monitoring the change
in absorbance at 490 nm. Triton X-100-releasable
-lactamase
activity was assayed as a measure of intracellular protein accumulation
and expressed as a percentage of the total
-lactamase activity
present in the samples.
Electron Microscopy
JRY188 cells transformed with either YCpGAL-SEC18 or YCpGAL-sec18-109 were inoculated into 200 ml minimal media supplemented with glycerol/ethanol (3%) and grown overnight at 25°C until the OD600 reached 0.2. Galactose was then added to 3%, and the cultures were grown further. For comparison, the temperature-sensitive sec18-1 strain, CHY01, was grown similarly overnight and then shifted to the restrictive temperature (37°C). Samples of 50 ml were immediately fixed in solution by the addition of 1:10 volume of 10× prefixative solution (10% glutaraldehyde, 2% methanol-free formaldehyde, 0.4 M potassium phosphate, pH 7). After 5 min, the samples were pelleted and processed before embedding in LR white. Sections cut for electron microscopy were stained sequentially with 2% uranyl acetate for 1-5 min and then with Reynolds lead citrate for 30 s.
Molecular Mass Estimation of Epitope-tagged Sec18p
INVSc1 yeast cells were transformed with pYES2-SEC18 or pYES2-sec18-109. These plasmids encode forms of Sec18p tagged with His6 and the V5 epitope at the C terminus. Transformants were inoculated into 200 ml minimal media supplemented with glucose (2%) and grown overnight at 25°C until the OD600 reached 0.6. Cells were harvested, washed with water, and resuspended in minimal media supplemented with 2% galactose and incubated further. Cells were then spheroplasted and lysed using a French press. Soluble proteins were isolated by centrifugation at 100,000 × g and separated on the basis of native molecular mass by gel filtration chromatography on a Superdex 200 column (Pharmacia, Uppsala, Sweden; 16:60, 120 ml bed volume) in buffer A (20 mM HEPES, pH 7.0, 200 mM KCl, 2 mM 2-mercaptoethanol, 0.5 mM ATP, 10% [wt/vol] glycerol, 50 mM imidazole) collecting 2-ml fractions. Column fractions were run on 10% polyacrylamide gels, transferred onto nitrocellulose, and immunoblotted for the V5 epitope using ECL to specifically detect recombinant forms of Sec18p.
Purification of Recombinant Proteins
Recombinant His6-tagged proteins
were extracted using a French press from XL-1Blue E. coli
resuspended in breaking buffer and purified using Ni-Nitrilotriacetic
acid agarose as previously described (Steel et al., 1999
).
Further purification of His6-Sec18p and
His6-Sec18-109p was achieved by gel filtration
chromatography on the Superdex 200 column in buffer A (Steel et
al., 1999
). All chromatography was performed at room temperature
using a Pharmacia FPLC system.
Sec18p Binding Assay
This was performed in polypropylene tubes as described
previously (Steel et al., 1999
). Bound samples were run on
10% polyacrylamide gels, and proteins were detected by
immunoblotting followed by ECL detection.
Sec18p ATPase Assay
ATPase assays were performed in flat-bottomed 96-well microtiter
plates as described previously (Steel et al., 1999
).
| |
RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
SEC18 is an essential gene in S. cerevisiae, and so to identify dominant loss-of-function mutants it was necessary to achieve conditional expression of mutant Sec18p proteins. This was accomplished by placing the wild-type SEC18 gene downstream of the galactose-inducible GAL1 promoter in a low copy number centromeric plasmid (YCpGAL-SEC18). Two random mutagenic strategies were then used: in vitro PCR mutagenesis and in vivo mutagenesis using a mutD strain of E. coli. Mutagenic efficiency was estimated by assaying complementation of the temperature-sensitive phenotype of a sec18-1 yeast strain grown on galactose. It was found that the proportion of temperature-sensitive, i.e., mutant, colonies was higher using PCR mutagenesis (20-45%, depending on PCR conditions) compared with the mutD approach (~5%). To reveal potential dominant mutations, the same pool of mutagenized DNA was transformed into the wild-type JRY188 yeast strain, which contains a normal chromosomal copy of the SEC18 gene. Of 3000 transformed colonies screened, 5 (2 from the mutD strategy, 3 from mutagenic PCR) exhibited the desired inducible dominant negative phenotype, i.e., normal growth on glucose-containing media and no growth on galactose-containing media. These five dominant loss-of-function mutant alleles were named sec18-108, -109, -110, -111, and -112. Of these, the only allele characterized extensively thus far is the sec18-109 mutant, which was produced using the mutD approach.
The galactose-inducible growth arrest exhibited by the dominant
negative mutants that were isolated is typified by
sec18-109. It can be seen that galactose-induced expression
of wild-type Sec18p in JRY188 cells allowed normal exponential growth
but that this was prevented by expression of Sec18-109p (Figure
1A). The pioneering work of Novick
et al. (1980)
established that yeast secretion
(sec) mutants, including the sec18-1 mutant,
undergo a density increase when shifted to the restrictive temperature caused by the accumulation of intracellular organelles. Similarly, we
observed that wild-type yeast transformed with
YCpGAL-sec18-109 exhibited a marked galactose-induced
density increase, whereas those transformed with
YCpGAL-SEC18 showed no such change (Figure 1B). To
determine whether this density increase was the result of a block in
membrane traffic, two independent assays of transport through the
biosynthetic pathway were performed. Transport through the exocytotic
pathway was monitored by assaying intracellular
-lactamase activity
after transformation with pYJS50. This plasmid encodes a
-lactamase-prepro-
-factor fusion protein that is correctly processed and secreted via the exocytotic pathway (A. Boyd, unpublished data). Cotransformation with YCpGAL-sec18-109 caused a
time-dependent accumulation of intracellular
-lactamase activity,
whereas cotransformation with YCpGAL-SEC18 was without
effect (Table 1), indicating a block at
one or more stages of the exocytotic pathway by Sec18-109p. Transport
of CPY to the vacuole was determined by following its processing from
the core glycosylated p1 form through the mannosylated p2 form to the
proteolyzed mature m form (Graham and Emr, 1991
). In untransformed
cells and cells transformed with YCpGAL-SEC18, only the
mature form of CPY was accumulated internally (Figure 2), consistent with the normal
trafficking and processing of CPY en route to the vacuole. In contrast,
transformation with YCpGAL-sec18-109 caused internal
accumulation of p1 CPY (Figure 2), indicating that this dominant
negative mutant interferes with Sec18p-dependent ER-Golgi membrane
traffic.
|
|
Although all yeast sec mutants exhibit a characteristic
temperature-induced block in secretion, electron microscopy
analysis has revealed differential organelle accumulation by individual sec strains (Novick et al., 1980
). The
sec18-1 strain exhibits accumulation of ER membranes and
small vesicles (Novick et al., 1980
), consistent with the
requirement for Sec18p in multiple stages of membrane traffic through
the biosynthetic pathway (Graham and Emr, 1991
). To study the effect of
Sec18-109p expression on cell morphology, electron microscopy was
performed on wild-type JRY188 yeast transformed with either
YCpGAL-sec18-109 or YCpGAL-SEC18. Galactose
induction was performed after growing the cells to early log phase in
glycerol/ethanol-supplemented minimal medium. It can be seen that
expression of Sec18-109p caused the accumulation of a fenestrated
membranous structure (Figure 3B).
Exaggerated membranous tubules were also seen in the sec18-1
strain at the restrictive temperature (Figure 3C) (Novick et
al., 1980
), and so presumably they represent ER-derived membrane.
In contrast, expression of wild-type Sec18p did not cause the formation
of such tubular networks, indicating that the membrane defects observed were solely due to the mutation in sec18-109.
|
To identify the sec18-109 mutation, both
YCpGAL-SEC18 and YCpGAL-sec18-109 were
sequenced. This revealed an additional codon (GTG) in the wild-type
gene between GAT1679 and
GTT1682, as defined in the original
SEC18 gene sequence cloned by Eakle et al.
(1988)
. This extra codon is confirmed in the Saccharomyces Genome
Database ORF YBR080c and predicts an additional glycine residue.
Sequencing of the sec18-109 mutant allele revealed that the
only change from the wild-type gene was a single nucleotide
substitution, A1721
C, resulting in a single
predicted amino acid substitution, Thr394
Pro. Figure 4A shows the position of
Thr394 in Sec18p, located in the D1 domain beyond
the Walker A and B boxes involved in ATP binding and hydrolysis.
Thr394 is within the minimal AAA consensus
sequence that defines members of the large and functionally diverse AAA protein family (Patel and Latterich, 1998
) and is highly conserved in
most, but not all, AAA proteins (Figure 4B).
|
NSF is known to be a homohexameric protein (Fleming et al.,
1998
), and its multisubunit structure is thought to be essential for
its function in membrane traffic (Whiteheart et al., 1994
). Sec18p can also form homohexamers (Hanson et al., 1997
;
Steel et al., 1999
), so if Sec18-109p induced the formation
of aberrant oligomeric forms, this could potentially explain the
dominant negative phenotype observed. To address this issue, V5
epitope-tagged versions of Sec18p and Sec18-109p were expressed in
wild-type INVSc1 cells using the GAL1-regulated,
2-µm-based pYES2 plasmid. Cytosolic (100,000 × g
supernatant) fractions were then subjected to gel filtration
chromatography, and the native molecular masses of the recombinant
proteins were estimated by Western blotting using an anti-V5 epitope
antibody. It can be seen that the distribution of epitope-tagged Sec18p
and Sec18-109p is similar, with both proteins peaking in fractions
26-27 (Figure 5A). From comparison with
molecular weight standards run on the same column, this corresponds to
a molecular mass of ~640 kDa, which is identical to the estimated molecular mass of the putative hexameric pool of bacterially expressed recombinant His6-Sec18p (Steel et
al., 1999
). Thus, it appears that the dominant negative phenotype
of the sec18-109 mutant is not due to gross structural
changes in the oligomeric state of Sec18p.
|
To estimate the degree of overexpression required to observe the strong
phenotype of sec18-109, JRY188 cells transformed with either
YCpGAL-sec18-109 or YCpGAL (i.e., an empty vector) were Western-blotted and probed with a Sec18p antibody. Sec18p was found to
partition approximately equally to the 100,000 × g
pellet and supernatant fractions (Figure 5B), as observed previously (Eakle et al., 1988
). As expected, the presence of glucose
or galactose had little effect on the expression of Sec18p in
YCpGAL-transformed cells, because this represented the endogenous pool
of Sec18p. A similar amount of Sec18p was detected in
YCpGAL-sec18-109-transformed cells grown in the presence of
glucose, indicating that expression of recombinant Sec18-109p was
tightly repressed under these conditions; however, when
YCpGAL-sec18-109-transformed cells were switched to
galactose, a clear increase in Sec18p levels was observed, presumably
caused by expression of recombinant Sec18-109p driven from the
GAL1 promoter (Figure 5B). Quantification of
125I-labeled protein G binding by phosphorimager
analysis using ImageQuant software (Pharmacia, Uppsala, Sweden)
revealed an approximately sixfold increase in total cellular Sec18p
levels in response to overnight incubation in galactose-containing
media. Expression levels from the YCpGAL-SEC18 and
YCpGAL-sec18-109 plasmids were approximately equal after
the overnight inductions that were used (Figure 5C).
Furthermore, the dominant negative effect of
YCpGAL-sec18-109 is not due to overexpression of
proteolytic fragments of Sec18p, because similar levels of breakdown
products were seen in YCpGAL-SEC18-transformed cells
(Figure 5C). The relatively modest level of overexpression of
sec18-109p suggests that mixed hexamers containing both wild-type and
mutant protomers would predominate in the cell and may be mainly
responsible for the dominant lethal phenotype.
The function of NSF in membrane traffic is widely accepted as being
dependent on binding to its cofactor,
-SNAP (Sec17p in yeast). To
assess whether the sec18-109 phenotype was due to impairment of this protein-protein interaction, a Sec17p binding assay was performed using bacterially expressed, his-tagged Sec18p. It can be
seen that the previously reported binding of Sec18p to immobilized Sec17p (Griff et al., 1992
; Steel et al., 1999
)
is also exhibited by Sec18-109p (Figure
6A), albeit at slightly reduced
efficiency, suggesting that the molecular defect in this mutant lies
downstream of Sec17p binding. Once NSF has bound via
-SNAP to the
SNARE complex, SNAP stimulation of NSF ATPase activity is thought to be
essential for disassembly of the complex and the consequent priming of
membrane fusion (Sumida et al., 1994
; Whiteheart et al., 1994
; Barnard et al., 1997
). Sec18p has low but
detectable ATPase activity that can be stimulated by Sec17p (Xu
et al., 1998
; Steel et al., 1999
), and so this
activity was investigated to determine whether it could explain the
dominant negative sec18-109 phenotype. It can be seen that
the ATPase activity of Sec18p was stimulated greatly by Sec17p, whereas
Sec18-109p ATPase activity was undetectable in the presence or absence
of Sec17p (Figure 6B). Sec18-109p ATPase activity remained negligible
even when a concentration 50-fold that used for wild-type Sec18p was
used, suggesting that the sec18-109 phenotype is a
consequence of a profound block in ATPase activity.
|
If the dominant negative effect of sec18-109 was really due
to reduced ATPase activity in the mutant protein, then other
ATPase-defective sec18 mutants should exhibit a similar
phenotype. To test this hypothesis, we analyzed the
sec18-E350Q mutant, in which a crucial Glu residue in the
D1 domain Walker B box is replaced by Gln. The corresponding mutation
in NSF (E329Q) has no effect on ATP binding but greatly inhibits
hydrolysis of this bound ATP (Whiteheart et al., 1994
). When
the sec18-E350Q and sec18-109 mutations were introduced into the 2-µm-based pSEY8-SEC18 plasmid, this
resulted in complete dominant lethality, whereas cells transformed with unaltered pSEY8-SEC18 remained viable (Figure
7A). In addition, recombinant
Sec18-E350Q protein was able to bind to immobilized Sec17p (Figure
7B), as was the case for Sec18-109p (Figure 6A). Furthermore,
Sec18-E350Q displayed negligible ATPase activity that could not be
stimulated by Sec17p (Figure 7C), as also shown for Sec18-109p (Figure
6A). Because sec18-109 and sec18-E350Q are
phenotypically indistinguishable at both the cellular and biochemical
level, this strongly supports the conclusion that the sec18-109
phenotype described here is the result of a block in D1 domain ATPase
activity.
|
| |
DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In this work we have used a generally applicable approach to
identify dominant negative mutants of the S. cerevisiae
SEC18 gene. The mutant described here, sec18-109, has a
phenotype similar to the well characterized temperature-sensitive
sec18-1 mutant in terms of exaggerated ER morphology (Novick
et al., 1981
) and defective membrane traffic to the vacuole
and cell surface (Graham and Emr, 1991
) but has revealed new insights
into the function of the AAA consensus sequence. All of the
sec mutations are recessive (Novick et al.,
1980
), and so the phenotype of sec18-1 at the restrictive
temperature can be assumed to mimic a null mutation in this essential
gene. The similarity of the sec18-109 phenotype therefore
suggests that this dominant mutation inhibits an essential function
required for all Sec18p-dependent cellular processes. Because
sec18-109 is phenotypically indistinguishable from the sec18-E350Q mutant, it is likely that this essential
function is ATPase activity in the D1 domain. Significantly, the
recessive nature of the temperature-sensitive sec18-1 mutant
means that the (unknown) mutation in this allele cannot be used
episomally and so investigations of Sec18p function have had to be
performed in a sec18-1 background. The sec18-109
mutant described here will allow conditional inhibition of membrane
traffic in any genetic background in vivo, and the isolated recombinant
Sec18-109p could also be used in more recently developed yeast
Sec18p-dependent in vitro reconstitution systems (Haas and Wickner,
1996
; Barlowe, 1997
). In addition, four further dominant negative
alleles await full characterization. Preliminary work indicates that
the sec18-112 mutant, despite displaying a galactose-induced
density shift, does not exhibit the block in membrane traffic through
the biosynthetic pathway exhibited by sec18-109 and
sec18-1 (our unpublished observations). Thus, it may be that
the remaining uncharacterized mutants selectively interfere with only a
subset of Sec18p-dependent processes, making them potentially useful
tools for the molecular dissection of membrane traffic.
The function of NSF in membrane traffic is thought to require
hexamerization, followed by binding to SNAP, which stimulates NSF
ATPase activity, resulting in SNARE disassembly and priming (Burgoyne
and Morgan, 1998
). If this model is correct, the ATPase-defective mutants, sec18-109 and sec18-E350Q (which have a
normal oligomeric structure and ability to interact with Sec17p), would
be predicted to result in the in vivo accumulation of unprimed SNARE
complexes and hence the dominant lethal phenotype that is observed.
This interpretation is consistent with the observation that an NSF D1
domain ATP-hydrolysis mutant acts as a dominant negative inhibitor of
mammalian intra-Golgi transport and endosome fusion (Sumida et
al., 1994
; Whiteheart et al., 1994
; Colombo et
al., 1996
) and can form, but not disassemble, 20 S
SNARE complexes (Nagiec et al., 1995
).
NSF and Sec18p belong to the AAA family of ATPases associated
with various cellular activities (Confalonieri and Duguet, 1995
). Members of this family contain one or two copies of a 230-amino acid
AAA module and function in diverse cellular processes ranging from
membrane traffic to proteolysis (Confalonieri and Duguet, 1995
). The
AAA module contains the Walker A and B boxes involved in nucleotide
binding and hydrolysis, and a distinct AAA consensus sequence of
unknown function (Patel and Latterich, 1998
).
Thr394, the residue mutated in Sec18-109p, is
highly conserved in AAA proteins and indeed forms part of the minimal
consensus sequence that defines the AAA family (Figure 4B). The
undetectable ATPase activity of purified Sec18-109p is strikingly
similar to that of the D1 domain ATP hydrolysis mutant, Sec18-E350Q,
suggesting that the minimal AAA consensus sequence controls D1 domain
ATPase activity in Sec18p.
The structure of the D1 domain of Sec18p or NSF is unknown, but
superimposing Thr394 onto the corresponding
residue (Thr654,) in the recently solved crystal
structure of the NSF D2 domain (Lenzen et al., 1998
; Yu
et al., 1998
) reveals it to be at the base of a loop
connecting
-sheet 4 to
-helix 5 (numbered according to Lenzen
et al., 1998
). This loop occupies a position between the
-phosphate of ATP and the DExx (Walker B) box and so is in an ideal
position to influence nucleotide hydrolysis (Figure
8) (Lenzen et al., 1998
; Yu
et al., 1998
). Indeed, the two adjacent amino acids,
Thr653 and Ser655, both
serve to coordinate the Mg2+ ion essential for
nucleotide hydrolysis (Figure 8). Although we cannot rule out an effect
on ATP binding, these crystal structures strongly suggest that the
defective ATPase phenotype observed in Sec18-109p is a consequence of a
block in ATP hydrolysis. Furthermore, the high conservation of this Thr
in the minimal AAA consensus sequence may indicate that this domain is
important for ATP hydrolysis in AAA proteins generally.
|
More recent sequence analyses have suggested that the AAA family
is a subset of a larger family of ATPases, termed the
AAA+ family (Neuwald et al., 1999
).
Members of the AAA+ family are thought to
function as molecular chaperones (Neuwald et al., 1999
), as
was originally suggested for NSF and the AAA proteins (Morgan and
Burgoyne, 1995
). Thr394 is within the
AAA+ Sensor 1 domain that has been suggested to
detect nucleotide binding or hydrolysis (Neuwald et al.,
1999
). Alternatively, the direct contact between Sensor 1 and the
-phosphate of ATP (Neuwald et al., 1999
), taken together
with the data presented here, may suggest a more active role for this
domain in regulating ATP hydrolysis.
Finally, the mutD strategy used here to create
sec18-109 can be applied to any essential yeast gene and
requires no subcloning or PCR steps, only the E.coli mutator
strain and the plasmid of interest. Indeed, a similar approach using
hydroxylamine mutagenesis to successfully isolate dominant lethal BiP
mutants has recently been described (McClellan et al.,
1998
). If the gene chosen has mammalian homologues, this may provide
important structural/functional information. Most importantly, if the
mutated residue(s) is conserved, this allows the generation of dominant
negative mutants of the mammalian protein to be used in more complex
systems. The informative power of such dominant negative mutants is
illustrated by the hundreds of articles in which dominant inhibitory
Ras or Ras-related GTPases were used (Feig, 1999
). We hope that the
simple, relatively rapid approach described here will allow new
dominant-acting mutations of important genes to be identified.
| |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
We thank Drs. Albert Haas, Tom Stevens, Scott Emr, and Randy Schekman for generous provision of materials, Dr. Reinhard Jahn for suggesting the modeling of the sec18-109 mutation on the NSF D2 crystal structure, and Drs. Wally Whiteheart and Richard Newmann for generous help with structural analysis. We thank Bob Burgoyne, Albert Haas, and Wally Whiteheart for helpful discussions and comments on the manuscript. This work was supported by a Wellcome Trust Project Grant (to A.M.) and a Wellcome Prize PhD Studentship (to C.H.).
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
These authors contributed equally to this work.
§ Present address: Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Department of Developmental and Molecular Biology, Bronx, NY 10461.
Corresponding author. E-mail address:
amorgan{at}liverpool.ac.uk.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
C. Zhao, E. A. Matveeva, Q. Ren, and S. W. Whiteheart Dissecting the N-Ethylmaleimide-sensitive Factor: REQUIRED ELEMENTS OF THE N AND D1 DOMAINS J. Biol. Chem., January 1, 2010; 285(1): 761 - 772. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. E. P. Dietrich, T. J. LaGrassa, J. Rohde, M. Cristodero, C. T. A. Meiringer, and C. Ungermann ATP-independent Control of Vac8 Palmitoylation by a SNARE Subcomplex on Yeast Vacuoles J. Biol. Chem., April 15, 2005; 280(15): 15348 - 15355. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. P. May, S. W. Whiteheart, and W. I. Weis Unraveling the Mechanism of the Vesicle Transport ATPase NSF, the N-Ethylmaleimide-sensitive Factor J. Biol. Chem., June 15, 2001; 276(25): 21991 - 21994. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||