|
|
|
|
Vol. 11, Issue 5, 1597-1609, May 2000

and
Departments of *Cell Biology and
Molecular Biophysics
and Biochemistry, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven,
Connecticut 06520-2114
| |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Eukaryotic cell cycle progression is controlled by a family of protein kinases known as cyclin-dependent kinases (Cdks). Two steps are essential for Cdk activation: binding of a cyclin and phosphorylation on a conserved threonine residue by the Cdk-activating kinase (CAK). We have studied the interplay between these regulatory mechanisms during the activation of the major Saccharomyces cerevisiae Cdk, Cdc28p. We found that the majority of Cdc28p was phosphorylated on its activating threonine (Thr-169) throughout the cell cycle. The extent of Thr-169 phosphorylation was similar for monomeric Cdc28p and Cdc28p bound to cyclin. By varying the order of the addition of cyclin and Cak1p, we determined that Cdc28p was activated most efficiently when it was phosphorylated before cyclin binding. Furthermore, we found that a Cdc28pT169A mutant, which cannot be phosphorylated, bound cyclin less well than wild-type Cdc28p in vivo. These results suggest that unphosphorylated Cdc28p may be unable to bind tightly to cyclin. We propose that Cdc28p is normally phosphorylated by Cak1p before it binds cyclin. This activation pathway contrasts with that in higher eukaryotes, in which cyclin binding appears to precede activating phosphorylation.
| |
INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Cdc28p, the Cdk that controls all cell cycle transitions in
Saccharomyces cerevisiae, is regulated by a number of
mechanisms, including cyclin binding, binding by inhibitors, and
inhibitory and stimulatory phosphorylations (reviewed by Mendenhall and
Hodge, 1998
). Activation of Cdc28p requires binding of a cyclin subunit and activating phosphorylation on Thr-169 by the Cdk-activating kinase
Cak1p. At least nine different cyclins interact with Cdc28p: Cln1p-Cln3p, which are required for the G1/S transition (START); Clb5p
and Clb6p, which act during S phase; and Clb1p-Clb4p, which regulate
events in G2 and mitosis (reviewed by Nasmyth, 1993
). Cyclin expression
and stability are tightly regulated so that cyclin levels oscillate
during the cell cycle (reviewed by Nasmyth, 1993
). Cyclin synthesis and
degradation depend, in many cases, on the activity of other
Cdc28p/cyclin complexes, ensuring that the appropriate cyclins
accumulate sequentially as the cell cycle progresses (Amon et
al., 1993
, 1994
; Stuart and Wittenberg, 1995
; Blondel and Mann,
1996
; Lanker et al., 1996
; Amon, 1997
; Schneider et
al., 1998
; Koepp et al., 1999
).
Cak1p, the protein kinase that phosphorylates Cdc28p on Thr-169, is a
distant member of the Cdk family (Espinoza et al., 1996
; Kaldis et al., 1996b
; Thuret et al., 1996
).
Unlike most kinases in this family, Cak1p is active as a monomer and
does not appear to be regulated during the vegetative cell cycle
(reviewed by Kaldis, 1999
). Cak1p protein levels and kinase activity
are constant throughout the cell cycle (Espinoza et al.,
1996
; Sutton and Freiman, 1997
), Cak1p is not posttranslationally
modified, and its localization does not change in a cell
cycle-dependent manner (Kaldis et al., 1998a
). However,
activating phosphorylation of Cdc28p might still be regulated by
controlling the access of Cdc28p to Cak1p or by the opposing action of
a Thr-169 phosphatase.
Although the regulation of Cdc28p by cyclins and Cak1p has been studied
intensively, it is not clear how these two regulatory mechanisms are
coordinated. Cdc28p could be phosphorylated by Cak1p and then bound by
cyclin, or, alternatively, cyclin binding could occur before activating
phosphorylation. Additionally, it is possible that the activation
pathway is different for different cyclins. The existing data do not
unequivocally support either pathway. Several studies suggest that
monomeric Cdc28p is phosphorylated. Experiments in which Cdc28p is
labeled in vivo with radioactive phosphate indicate that the overall
phosphorylation level of Cdc28p is similar in cycling cells, which
contain both monomeric Cdc28p and Cdc28p/cyclin complexes, and in cells
arrested in G1 by the mating pheromone
-factor, which contain only
monomeric Cdc28p (Hadwiger and Reed, 1988
; Wittenberg and Reed, 1988
).
Furthermore, monomeric Cdks are much better substrates for Cak1p in
vitro than Cdk/cyclin complexes (Kaldis et al., 1998b
).
Although these studies show that Cdc28p can be phosphorylated as a
monomer and that cells contain a pool of phosphorylated monomeric
Cdc28p, they do not rule out the possibility that there may also be a
pool of unphosphorylated Cdc28p that is preferentially targeted by
cyclins. There is some evidence that G1 cyclins may selectively bind to
unphosphorylated Cdc28p. A mutant form of Cdc28p in which Thr-169 is
replaced by glutamate (Cdc28pT169E) to mimic
constitutive phosphorylation binds to Clb2p but is unable to bind to
Cln2p (Lim et al., 1996
). The interpretation of this result
is not straightforward, however, because mutation of additional sites
in Cdc28pT169E allowed the protein to bind to
both G1 and mitotic cyclins and to be active in the absence of Cak1p
phosphorylation (Cross and Levine, 1998
). This mutant supported cell
growth, demonstrating that reversible phosphorylation of Thr-169 does
not seem to be an absolute requirement for cell cycle progression.
Because many of these studies provided indirect evidence or used Cdks from organisms other than budding yeast, we decided to reexamine the Cdc28p activation pathway. In this paper, we report the results of two approaches. We developed an antibody specific for the Thr-169-phosphorylated form of Cdc28p and determined the level of Thr-169 phosphorylation during the cell cycle, and we used an in vitro system to study whether Cdc28p activation depends on the order of cyclin binding and Thr-169 phosphorylation.
| |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Yeast Strains and Media
Plasmids and genotypes of strains are listed in Tables
1 and 2. To
isolate PKB340, DNA was prepared from a 5-ml culture of strain PKY171
by vortexing with glass beads in phenol:chloroform:isoamyl alcohol
(25:24:1, vol/vol) and introduced into Escherichia
coli by transformation (Ausubel et al., 1995
).
Strain SY89 was transformed with PKB289, grown on 5-FOA to select
against the 2µm URA3 CAK1 plasmid, and then transformed
with PKB340 to create YKR101. The Clb2p-MYC9
expression plasmid was created by removing a NotI fragment encoding an HA3 tag from plasmid pWS945 and
replacing it with a NotI fragment encoding a
MYC9 tag obtained from plasmid pAG5.
|
|
Yeast media (YPD, complete minimal (CM), 5-FOA) were prepared as
described (Ausubel et al., 1995
). For cell cycle arrests, YKR106 was grown to an OD600 of 0.4-0.8 in
CM/glucose, collected by vacuum filtration with the use of a 0.45-µm
cellulose acetate filter system (Corning, Corning, NY),
resuspended at an OD600 of 0.2-0.3 in YPD
containing 50 ng/ml
-factor (Sigma, St. Louis, MO), 50 µg/ml
benomyl (DuPont, Wilmington, DE), or 400 mM hydroxyurea (Sigma), and
incubated for 3-4 h at 30°C.
Yeast Extracts
Arrested cells or exponential phase cells
(OD600 = 0.3-0.8) were collected by
centrifugation for 5 min at 2000 × g in a Sorvall (Newtown, CT) HB-6 or GS-3 rotor. Cells (0.2-0.3 g wet weight) were
resuspended in 1 ml of buffer A (20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.9, 100 mM NaCl,
10 mM MgCl2, 40 mM EDTA, 5% glycerol, 1 mM DTT,
1 mM PMSF, 1× protease inhibitors [10 µg/ml each leupeptin,
chymostatin, and pepstatin {Chemicon, Temecula, CA}], 1 mM
NaF, 0.1 mM Na3VO4). Glass
beads (0.8 g of 0.5-mm beads; Biospec Products, Bartlesville, OK) were added, and cells were disrupted by bead beating (Klekamp and
Weil, 1982
) for 5 × 1 min at the highest setting in a
Mini-Beadbeater-8 (Biospec Products) with 2 min of cooling in an ice
water-NaCl bath (
5°C) after each round of bead beating. The crude
extracts were centrifuged for 10 min at 15,000 × g in
a microfuge at 4°C, and the supernatant was clarified for 15 min at
70,000 rpm in a TLA100.2 or TLA100.3 rotor in a Beckman (Fullerton, CA)
Optima ultracentrifuge at 4°C. Extracts were frozen in liquid
nitrogen and stored at
80°C. Protein concentrations, as determined
by Bradford assay (Bio-Rad, Richmond, CA), ranged from 3.0 to 8.5 mg/ml.
Gel Filtration
Extracts were fractionated by gel filtration with the use of a
Superdex 200 HR 10/30 column (Pharmacia, Piscataway, NJ) at a flow rate
of 0.5 ml/min on a fast-protein liquid chromatography system as
described (Kaldis et al., 1996b
, 1998a
). Extract protein (4 mg) was passed through a 0.2-µm filter, loaded on the column, and run
in buffer B (25 mM HEPES, pH 7.4, 100 mM NaCl, 10 mM EDTA, 1× protease
inhibitors). One-milliliter fractions were collected.
Antibodies, Immunoblotting, and Immunoprecipitations
To raise the anti-phospho-Thr-169 (
-P-Thr-169) antibody, a
12-amino acid synthetic peptide derived from Cdc28p with a
phosphothreonine at position 169 [CPLRAY(PO4-T)HEIVT] was coupled to Keyhole
Limpet Hemocyanine (Pierce, Rockford, IL) and used to immunize rabbits, as described previously (Schneider et al., 1983
; Kaldis
et al., 1996a
). The serum was affinity purified against the
phosphopeptide coupled to Sulfo-Link Coupling Gel (Pierce). The final
concentration of purified immunoglobulin G (IgG) was 0.77 mg/ml.
Immunoblots for Thr-169-phosphorylated Cdc28p were made
with the use of
-P-Thr-169 (1.5 µg/ml), mouse anti-rabbit IgG (0.5 µg/ml; Pierce), and HRP-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG (0.4 µg/ml;
Pierce). For detection of total Cdc28p, affinity-purified
-PSTAIR
antibody (0.5 µg/ml; Solomon et al., 1990
) and
HRP-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG (0.4 µg/ml; Pierce) were used.
For detection of influenza hemagglutinin (HA)-tagged proteins, 12CA5
antibody (0.5-1 µg/ml; Wilson et al., 1984
) and HRP-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG (0.16-0.4 µg/ml) or
affinity-purified rabbit
-HA antibody (0.1 µg/ml; Santa Cruz
Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA) and HRP-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG
(0.4 µg/ml) were used. To detect MYC-tagged proteins, protein
A-purified 9E10 (5 µg/ml; a kind gift of J. Sedivy, Brown
University, Providence, RI) and HRP-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG
(0.16 µg/ml) were used. All antibodies were diluted in buffer C (10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, 150 mM NaCl, 0.1% Tween, 5% nonfat milk).
Immunoblots were developed with the use of
chemiluminescence reagents (SuperSignal ECL, Pierce). Blots were
stripped by incubating for 30 min at 50°C in buffer D (62.5 mM
Tris-HCl, pH 6.7, 100 mM 2-mercaptoethanol, 2% SDS) followed by two
10-min washes in buffer C without milk.
To immunoprecipitate Cdc28p-HA from gel filtration fractions, 1 ml of protein A-agarose beads (Life Technologies, Grand Island, NY) was preincubated with 100 µg of 12CA5 ascites fluid in buffer E (10 mM Na2HPO4, pH 7.4, 2 mM KH2PO4, 137 mM NaCl, 3 mM KCl, 0.5% NP-40, 1× protease inhibitors) for 1-2 h at 4°C. The beads were washed four times with buffer E, and 70 µl was incubated with 400 µl of gel filtration fraction (diluted to 800 µl with buffer E containing 40 mM EDTA) for 2 h at 4°C. Beads were washed four times with buffer E containing 40 mM EDTA and four times with buffer E without EDTA or NP-40.
To immunoprecipitate Clb2p-MYC9, strains YKR108 and YKR109 were grown to an OD600 of 0.2-0.4 in CM/galactose. YKR107 was grown in CM/glucose as a "no-MYC" control. Extracts were prepared as described above except that buffer A contained only 1 mM EDTA and no DTT. Protein A-agarose beads (500 µl) were preincubated with 500 µg of protein A-purified 9E10 in buffer E for 2 h at 4°C. The beads were washed four times with buffer E, and 70 µl was incubated with 1 ml of extract (diluted to 1 mg/ml with buffer E) for 2 h at 4°C. The beads were then washed four times with 1 ml of buffer E and four times with 1 ml of buffer E without NP-40. Protein was eluted from the beads by incubation in 2× SDS-PAGE sample buffer lacking DTT at 65°C for 10 min and analyzed with SDS-PAGE.
Preparation of Recombinant Proteins
MBP-Clb2p (the construct was a kind gift of M. Olson and R. Deshaies, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA) and MBP-Cln2p (the construct was a kind gift of E. Egan, Yale University, New Haven, CT) were expressed in E. coli and purified with the use of amylose resin according to the manufacturer's instructions (New England Biolabs, Beverly, MA). Approximately 0.5 mg of MBP-Clb2p was obtained from 1 l of culture, and ~0.5 mg of MBP-Cln2p was obtained from 500 ml of culture.
Cdc28p-HA was expressed in Hi5 insect cells. After 2 d of
infection with a Cdc28p-HA recombinant baculovirus (a kind gift of J.W.
Harper, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX), cells were collected
from nine 75-mm2 culture flasks, harvested by
centrifugation at 1000 × g for 4 min, resuspended in 4 ml of buffer F (10 mM HEPES, pH 7.4, 10 mM NaCl, 5 mM EDTA, 1×
protease inhibitors, 0.1% Tween), and incubated on ice for 15 min.
Buffer G (10 mM HEPES, pH 7.4, 900 mM NaCl, 5 mM EDTA; total, 450 µl)
was added, and the lysate was centrifuged for 20 min at 10,000 × g at 4°C. The supernatant was diluted 1:2 with buffer H
(10 mM HEPES, pH 7.4, 100 mM NaCl, 5 mM EDTA, 1× protease inhibitors,
0.5% NP-40). For immunoprecipitation of Cdc28p-HA, 1 ml of protein
A-agarose was incubated for 6 h with 200 µg of 12CA5 antibody
in 10 ml of buffer H at 4°C. The beads were washed with buffer H,
added to the diluted extract, and incubated for 3 h at 4°C. The
beads were then washed four times with buffer H and four times with
buffer H with no NP-40, divided into aliquots, frozen in liquid
nitrogen, and stored at
80°C. The yield was ~1 ng of Cdc28p-HA
per microliter of beads.
To prepare unphosphorylated Cdc28p-his6, 1 l
of YKR101 was grown to an OD600 of 0.5 in
CM/raffinose-LEU at 23°C. Thirty percent galactose was added to a
final concentration of 2%, and the culture was shifted to 37°C for
8 h to induce expression of Cdc28p-his6 and
to inactivate Cak1p. Cells were harvested, and
Cdc28p-his6 was purified with the use of Talon
metal affinity resin (Clontech, Palo Alto, CA) according to the
manufacturer's instructions. Fractions containing the protein were
further purified on a gel filtration column. Fractions 16 and 17 from
the gel filtration column containing the monomeric
Cdc28p-his6 were pooled and concentrated with the use of Centricon-10 cells (Amicon, Beverly, MA). Approximately 5 µg
of Cdc28p-his6 was obtained. GST-Ptc2p and
GST-Ptc3p were purified as described and were a kind gift of A. Cheng
(Yale University, New Haven, CT) (Cheng et al., 1999
)
S. cerevisiae Cks1p (a kind gift of E. Egan) was expressed
in E. coli from plasmid pRK171 (Tang and Reed, 1993
). One
liter of cells was grown to an OD600 of 0.54, and
protein expression was induced with 0.4 mM
isopropylthio-
-galactoside for 2.5 h at 37°C. Cells were
harvested, washed, and resuspended in 10 ml of buffer I (10 mM
Na2HPO4, pH 7.4, 2 mM
KH2PO4, 137 mM NaCl, 3 mM
KCl, 10 mM DTT, 1× protease inhibitors). The suspension was sonicated
twice for 30 s with the use of a microtip at its maximum setting.
The crude lysate was boiled for 5 min and then clarified by
ultracentrifugation for 30 min at 40,000 rpm in a Beckman 60 Ti rotor.
Ammonium sulfate was added to 28% saturation. The extract was rotated
for 30 min at 4°C and then centrifuged for 10 min at 15,000 × g in a Sorvall SA-600 rotor. The pellet was resuspended in
10 ml of buffer J (50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 2 mM EDTA, 100 mM NaCl) and
dialyzed against 500 ml of the same buffer overnight at 4°C in
Spectrapor dialysis tubing with a molecular weight cutoff of 3500. The
dialyzed protein was centrifuged for 10 min at 15,000 × g in a Sorvall SA-600 rotor to remove insoluble material and was then divided into aliquots, frozen in liquid nitrogen, and stored
at
80°C. The yield was ~20 mg of Cks1p.
GST-Cdc28p was expressed in E. coli and purified as
described (Kaldis et al., 1996b
). GST-Cak1p was expressed in
insect cells.
Phosphorylation and Phosphatase Treatment of Cdc28p-his6
To demonstrate the specificity of the
-P-Thr-169 antibody
(see Figure 1), Cdc28p-his6 was either
phosphorylated in vitro with GST-Cak1p or treated with phosphatase to
reverse any phosphorylation that occurred during expression. For the
phosphorylation reaction, 1 µg of Cdc28p-his6
was incubated in a 40-µl reaction with 2.4 µg of GST-Cak1p and 500 µM ATP in buffer K (50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, 15 mM
MgCl2, 1 mM DTT, 1× protease inhibitors, 1 mg/ml
ovalbumin). To dephosphorylate Cdc28p-his6, 1 µg was incubated in a 40-µl reaction with 20 mM
MgCl2, 5 µg of GST-Ptc2p, and 5 µg of
GST-Ptc3p in buffer L (20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, 0.1 mM EDTA, 0.1 mM
EGTA, 20 mM MgCl2, 1 mM DTT, 1× protease
inhibitors, 1 mg/ml ovalbumin, 0.1% Tween). Both reactions
proceeded for 2.5 h at room temperature and were stopped with 40 µl of 5× SDS-PAGE buffer.
To measure Cdc28p-his6 phosphorylation in the
presence of cyclin (see Figure 6B), 50 ng of
Cdc28p-his6 in 5 µl of buffer K was incubated
with 5 µl of buffer M (10 mM sodium phosphate, pH 7.2, 500 mM NaCl, 1 mM EGTA, 1 mM DTT, 1× protease inhibitors, 10 mM maltose) containing
various amounts of MBP-Clb2p (molar ratio of MBP-Clb2p to
Cdc28p-his6 ranged from 0 to 43) for 30 min at
room temperature. Ten microliters of a mixture containing 7.5 ng of
GST-Cak1p, 10 mM MgCl2, 500 µM ATP, and 5 µCi
of [
-32P]ATP in buffer K was added, and
incubation was continued for 30 min at room temperature. Reactions were
stopped by the addition of 10 µl of SDS-PAGE sample buffer and
analyzed by SDS-PAGE and phosphorimaging.
To phosphorylate Cdc28p-HA produced in insect cells (see Figure 4A), 50 µl of Cdc28p-HA beads were incubated in a 30-µl reaction with 1.8 µg of GST-Cak1p and 500 µM ATP in buffer K for 2.5 h at room temperature.
Quantitation of Cdc28p-his6 Phosphorylation
Three micrograms of Cdc28p-his6 was
phosphorylated in a 40-µl reaction with 2.4 µg of GST-Cak1p, 500 µM ATP, and 20 µCi of [
-32P]ATP in
buffer K for 2.5 h at room temperature. The reaction was stopped
by the addition of 20 µl of 5× SDS-PAGE buffer. Thirty microliters
of the reaction mixture was run on SDS-PAGE alongside BSA standards of
known concentrations. The gel was stained with Coomassie blue and
dried, and the Cdc28p-his6 band was
phosphorimaged (Molecular Imager GS-250, Bio-Rad). The amount of
phosphorylated Cdc28p-his6 was calculated from
the phosphorimager exposure, and the total
Cdc28p-his6 present was estimated by comparing
the Coomassie blue-stained band with the BSA standards. The level of
phosphorylation was ~90%. The remaining
Cdc28p-his6 from this reaction was run alongside
dilutions of fraction 16 of the
-factor-arrested extract and
blotted with
-P-Thr-169 and
-PSTAIR to determine the level of
Cdc28p-HA phosphorylation in the yeast extract (see Figure 2B).
H1 Kinase Assays
To assay the histone H1 kinase activity of gel filtration
fractions, immunoprecipitated Cdc28p-HA bound to protein A-agarose beads was divided into four 10-µl aliquots (aliquots 1-4). Aliquots 1 and 2 were incubated in 10 µl of "no-CAK" mix (1× ATP
regenerating system [50 µg/ml creatine kinase, 35 mM
phosphocreatine, 1 mM ATP, 2 mM HEPES, pH 7.2, 1 mM MgOAc], 500 µM
ATP in buffer K), and aliquots 3 and 4 were incubated in 10 µl of
"plus-CAK" mix (1× ATP regenerating system, 500 µM ATP,
50 ng of GST-Cak1p in buffer K) for 30 min at room temperature. Five
microliters of buffer K (aliquots 1 and 3) or 5 µl of "Clb" mix
(1 µg of MBP-Clb2p in buffer K) (aliquots 2 and 4) was added, and
incubation was continued for another 30 min. Nine microliters of H1 mix
(1 mM ATP, 10 mM MgCl2, 2.25 µCi of
[
-32P]ATP, 267 µg/ml histone H1 [stored
in 0.2 M NaCl, 0.1 mM EDTA, 20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.4, 1 mM DTT, 1×
protease inhibitors]) was added, and reactions were incubated for 30 min and stopped by the addition of 15 µl of 5× SDS-PAGE buffer.
In Vitro Phosphorylation and Activation of Cdc28p
For in vitro activation of baculovirus Cdc28p-HA (see Figure 4B), 5 µl of Cdc28p-HA beads was incubated in 10 µl of buffer K containing 500 µM ATP, 5 mM MgCl2, with or without 100 nM Cks1p, with or without 9 ng of GST-Cak1p, and with 7.5 ng of MBP-Clb2p, 1.5 µg of MBP-Cln2p, or buffer for 30 min at room temperature. Beads were washed five times with 200 µl of buffer K and resuspended in 10 µl of buffer K. Six microliters of H1 mix (see above) was added, beads were incubated for 30 min at room temperature, and reactions were stopped by the addition of 10 µl of 5× SDS-PAGE sample buffer.
For order-of-addition experiments (see Figure 5), 10 µl of baculovirus Cdc28p-HA beads was incubated with 20 µl of buffer K containing 100 nM Cks1p, 500 µM ATP, 5 mM MgCl2, with or without 12 ng of GST-Cak1p, and with 40 ng of MBP-Clb2p, 3 µg of MBP-Cln2p, or buffer M for 30 min at room temperature (first incubation). Beads were washed and incubated in the same way as for the first incubation (second incubation). Beads were washed again and assayed for H1 kinase activity.
To assay Cdc28p-HA phosphorylation (see Figure 6A), 10 µl of
Cdc28p-HA beads was incubated in 20 µl of buffer K containing 100 nM
Cks1p, 500 µM ATP, 5 mM MgCl2, and
either 40 ng of MBP-Clb2p, 3 µg of MBP-Cln2p, or buffer M for 30 min
at room temperature. Five microliters of beads was incubated in 10 µl
of buffer K containing 500 µM ATP, 10 µCi of
[
-32P]ATP, 100 nM Cks1p, 5 mM
MgCl2, with or without 12 ng of GST-Cak1p for 30 min. Beads were pelleted, the mix was removed, and the beads were
resuspended in 25 µl of 2.5× SDS-PAGE sample buffer.
To determine the effect of washing on cyclin binding (see Figure 6C), 10 µl of Cdc28p-HA beads was incubated in 20 µl of buffer K containing 100 nM Cks1p, 500 µM ATP, 5 mM MgCl2, and either 40 ng MBP-Clb2p, 3 µg of MBP-Cln2p, or buffer M for 30 min at room temperature. Half of the reactions were washed and resuspended in 14 µl of buffer K containing 100 nM Cks1p, 500 µM ATP, 5 mM MgCl2, and 6 µl of buffer M (final volume was 20 µl). Five microliters of beads from each reaction was then incubated in 10 µl of buffer K containing 500 µM ATP, 100 nM Cks1p, 5 mM MgCl2, with or without 12 ng of GST-Cak1p. Beads were washed and H1 kinase assays were performed as described above.
For all of the baculovirus Cdc28p-HA activation experiments, GST-Cak1p and Cks1p were diluted in buffer K, and buffer K was used in place of these proteins in reactions in which they were omitted. MBP-Clb2p and MBP-Cln2p were diluted in buffer M, and buffer M was used in place of cyclin when it was omitted.
| |
RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Detection of the Thr-169-phosphorylated Form of Cdc28p
To examine the phosphorylation of the activating threonine of
Cdc28p (Thr-169) during the cell cycle, we raised a peptide antibody
(
-P-Thr-169) against the Thr-169-phosphorylated form of Cdc28p. The
-P-Thr-169 antibody could detect as little as 3.7 ng of
Cdc28p-his6 phosphorylated in vitro by GST-Cak1p
while not reacting with 300 ng of unphosphorylated
Cdc28p-his6 (Figure 1A, top). The membrane was reprobed with
an
-PSTAIR antibody, which reacts with all forms of Cdc28p, to
demonstrate that equivalent amounts of phosphorylated and
unphosphorylated protein were loaded on the gel (Figure 1A, bottom). As
a further negative control for the antibody, we used bacterially
produced GST-Cdc28p. Up to 2 µg of this unphosphorylated GST-Cdc28p
was still undetectable by the
-P-Thr-169 antibody (Figure 1A),
indicating that the antibody is highly specific for the
Thr-169-phosphorylated form of Cdc28p. The
-P-Thr-169 antibody also
recognized recombinant human Cdk2 phosphorylated on its activating
threonine but not phosphorylated human Cdk6 (P. Kaldis and M.J.
Solomon, unpublished observations).
|
To further test the antibody, we used yeast strains that expressed both
endogenous Cdc28p and either Cdc28p-HA or
Cdc28pT169A-HA, in which the activating threonine
had been mutated to an alanine. The untagged and HA-tagged forms were
distinguishable on SDS-PAGE due to their different sizes. The
-PSTAIR antibody (Figure 1B, top) recognized the endogenous and
HA-tagged forms of Cdc28p in both strains, whereas the
-HA antibody
(Figure 1B, middle) recognized only the more slowly migrating HA-tagged
forms. The
-P-Thr-169 antibody (Figure 1B, bottom) recognized
endogenous Cdc28p in both strains and the wild-type HA-tagged Cdc28p
but did not react with Cdc28pT169A-HA. These
results demonstrate that the
-P-Thr-169 antibody can specifically
recognize phosphorylated Cdc28p in yeast extracts.
We also tested the antibody on an extract that contained
otherwise wild-type unphosphorylated Cdc28p. We used a strain that was
deleted for CAK1 (Figure 1C,
cak1) so that the
endogenous Cdc28p was entirely unphosphorylated on Thr-169. Normally,
deletion of CAK1 is lethal; however, this strain was kept
alive by a mutant form of Cdc28p with a threonine-to-glutamate mutation
at position 169 (T169E) and a number of other point mutations that
allow it to function in the absence of activating phosphorylation
(Cdc28p43244-HA; Cross and Levine, 1998
). Because
of the HA tag on Cdc28p43244-HA, it could be
distinguished from the untagged wild-type Cdc28p, which was also
present in the cell. As a control, we used a strain that was identical
except that it expressed Cak1p (Figure 1C, CAK1). Total
extracts were loaded onto a gel filtration column, and fractions 16 and
17, which contained the majority of the Cdc28p, were
immunoblotted with the
-P-Thr-169 and
-PSTAIR
antibodies. The
-PSTAIR antibody (Figure 1C, top) recognized both
forms of Cdc28p in both strains. The T169E mutant, despite functioning like a constitutively phosphorylated form of Cdc28p, was not recognized by the
-P-Thr-169 antibody (Figure 1C, bottom). Most importantly, the
-P-Thr-169 antibody recognized wild-type Cdc28p in the
CAK1 strain in which Thr-169 was presumably phosphorylated
but did not recognize the unphosphorylated wild-type Cdc28p in the
cak1 strain. Therefore, the
-P-Thr-169 antibody reacts
specifically with Thr-169-phosphorylated Cdc28p in yeast extracts.
Cdc28p Phosphorylation during the Cell Cycle
We next determined whether the level of Thr-169 phosphorylation
varied during the cell cycle and whether the phosphorylation of
monomeric Cdc28p differed from that of active Cdc28p complexes. Using a
strain that expressed Cdc28p-HA as its only form of Cdc28p, we prepared
extracts from cycling cells and from cells arrested in G1 by the mating
pheromone
-factor, in S phase by the DNA replication inhibitor
hydroxyurea (HU), and in mitosis by the spindle-depolymerizing agent
benomyl (see MATERIALS AND METHODS). We added 40 mM EDTA to the lysis
buffer to inhibit phosphorylation of Cdc28p by Cak1p and its
dephosphorylation by the Cdc28p phosphatases Ptc2p and Ptc3p (Cheng
et al., 1999
) during extract preparation. To separate
monomeric Cdc28p from its cyclin-bound form, we fractionated the
extracts on a Superdex 200 column. Fractions 9-19 were
immunoblotted with the
-P-Thr-169 antibody to determine
the level of Thr-169-phosphorylated Cdc28p-HA and with the
-HA
antibody to determine the total amount of Cdc28p-HA present (Figure
2A). Cycling, HU-arrested, and
benomyl-arrested extracts had similar distributions of Cdc28p-HA. The
majority of Cdc28p-HA was monomeric and eluted in fractions 16 and 17. There was also a second peak of Cdc28p complexes in fractions 12-14.
These results agree with a previous gel filtration study of the
distribution of Cdc28p (Wittenberg and Reed, 1988
). In the
-factor-arrested extract, all of the Cdc28p-HA was monomeric, consistent with the fact that G1-arrested cells contain very little cyclin (Amon et al., 1994
). In all four extracts, the
-P-Thr-169 and the
-HA immunoblots looked
qualitatively similar. This finding suggested that the proportion of
Cdc28p-HA phosphorylated on Thr-169 was similar throughout the cell
cycle and did not change when Cdc28p-HA was incorporated into
complexes.
|
To quantitate the level of Cdc28p-HA phosphorylation in the gel
filtration fractions, we first compared the level of Cdc28p-HA phosphorylation in fraction 16 of the
-factor-arrested extract with
that of recombinant Cdc28p-his6 that had been
90% phosphorylated by GST-Cak1p in vitro (see MATERIALS AND METHODS;
Figure 2B). We immunoblotted serial dilutions of fraction
16 and Cdc28p-his6 with
-P-Thr-169 and
-PSTAIR to determine the levels of phosphorylated and total Cdc28p,
respectively. For both fraction 16 and
Cdc28p-his6, the ratio of Thr-169-phosphorylated
Cdc28p (
-P-Thr-169 signal) to total Cdc28p (
-PSTAIR signal) was
the same, indicating that the Cdc28p-HA in fraction 16 was also ~90%
phosphorylated. Next, we immunoblotted fractions 12-14
(complexes peak) and fractions 16 and 17 (monomeric peak) from the four
extracts with the
-P-Thr-169 and
-PSTAIR antibodies and estimated
the level of Cdc28p-HA phosphorylation relative to that of fraction 16 of the
-factor-arrested extract. Using the fact that the Cdc28p-HA
in fraction 16 was 90% phosphorylated, we then computed the absolute
level of Cdc28p-HA phosphorylation in each fraction (Figure 2C).
Cdc28p-HA was nearly 100% phosphorylated at all times (mean, 100%;
SD, 12%). We found no significant variations between monomeric
Cdc28p-HA (mean, 99%; SD, 14%) and Cdc28p-HA in complexes (mean,
102%; SD, 9%) or among any of the cell cycle phases that we examined.
Our results indicate that both monomeric Cdc28p-HA and Cdc28p-HA in
complexes are essentially completely phosphorylated throughout the cell cycle.
As a second assay for the level of Thr-169 phosphorylation, we
immunoprecipitated the Cdc28p-HA from the gel filtration fractions and
determined its histone H1 kinase activity in the presence and absence
of added cyclin and Cak1p. If there were a significant amount of
unphosphorylated Cdc28p-HA in the immunoprecipitates, incubation with
Cak1p and cyclin should result in a higher level of histone H1 kinase
activity than incubation with cyclin alone, whereas if the Cdc28p-HA
were already highly phosphorylated, Cak1p should have little additional
effect. The results support the conclusion that the majority of
Cdc28p-HA was phosphorylated (Figure 3).
In the absence of cyclin (squares), there was a peak of H1 kinase
activity in fractions 13 and 14 of the cycling, HU-arrested, and
benomyl-arrested extracts, indicating that these fractions contained
active Cdc28p-HA/cyclin complexes. Addition of an excess of MBP-Clb2p
generated a peak of H1 kinase activity in the monomeric fractions
(fractions 16 and 17) in all four extracts (circles). However, the
addition of GST-Cak1p (closed symbols) had no significant effect on the
H1 kinase activity of any of the fractions in the presence or absence
of cyclin (compare open and closed symbols). We conclude that Cdc28p-HA
was highly phosphorylated on Thr-169 under all conditions that we
tested.
|
Activation of Recombinant Cdc28p-HA In Vitro
To determine whether the minimal events required for Cdc28p
activation
cyclin binding and Thr-169 phosphorylation
have to occur
in a particular order, we developed an in vitro system for activation
of Cdc28p. This system used only recombinant proteins and allowed us to
incubate Cdc28p individually with each of the components required for
its activation. We expressed Cdc28p-HA in insect cells and bound it via
-HA antibodies to protein A-agarose beads. Because the Cdc28p-HA
was immobilized on beads, we were able to perform sequential
incubations with cyclin and Cak1p with intervening washes.
We first tested the insect cell-produced Cdc28p-HA to ensure that it
was not significantly phosphorylated on Thr-169 by endogenous insect
cell kinases and that it could be phosphorylated in vitro by
recombinant GST-Cak1p (Figure 4A). We
incubated Cdc28p-HA beads with either GST-Cak1p (Figure 4A,
PO4-Cdc28p-HA) or buffer (Figure 4A, Cdc28p-HA)
and immunoblotted with
-P-Thr-169 antibodies to determine the extent of Thr-169 phosphorylation (top) and with
-HA
antibodies to measure the total amount of Cdc28p-HA present (bottom).
The
-P-Thr-169 antibody was unable to detect 20 µl of untreated
Cdc28p-HA beads, demonstrating that Cdc28p-HA is not highly
phosphorylated in insect cells. After incubation with GST-Cak1p, as
little as 3 µl of Cdc28p-HA beads reacted with the
-P-Thr-169
antibody. Thus, treatment with GST-Cak1p increased Thr-169
phosphorylation of Cdc28p-HA at least sevenfold and perhaps much more.
|
Cdc28p-HA beads had only background levels of histone H1 kinase
activity in the absence of cyclin and GST-Cak1p (Figure 4B, lane 1) or
when incubated with cyclin alone (lanes 3 and 4). Incubation of
Cdc28p-HA beads with MBP-Clb2p and GST-Cak1p produced readily detectable levels of H1 kinase activity (lane 7). Incubation of Cdc28p-HA with MBP-Cln2p and GST-Cak1p failed to produce activity above
background unless Cks1p was included (compare lanes 8 and 10). Cks1p is
the homologue of Schizosaccharomyces pombe Suc1 (Hadwiger
et al., 1989
). The function of these Cdk-binding proteins is
not well understood, but Cks1p has been used previously to improve the
activity of recombinant Cdc28p/Cln2p complexes (Feldman et
al., 1997
; Skowyra et al., 1997
). Cks1p did not
activate Cdc28p-HA in the absence of cyclin (lane 2) or GST-Cak1p
(lanes 5 and 6) and did not significantly improve the activation of
Cdc28p-HA by MBP-Clb2p and GST-Cak1p (compare lanes 7 and 9). Because
of its strong effect on Cdc28p-HA/MBP-Cln2p activity, we included Cks1p
in all of our subsequent experiments.
To determine whether activation of Cdc28p-HA depended on the order of
addition of cyclin and Cak1p, we incubated Cdc28p-HA beads with cyclin,
GST-Cak1p, or both (Figure 5, first
incubation), washed the beads thoroughly with buffer, incubated the
beads again with cyclin, GST-Cak1p, or both (Figure 5, second
incubation), washed the beads a second time, and finally assayed for
histone H1 kinase activity. ATP and Cks1p were included in all assays during both incubations. The highest levels of activity were generated when cyclin and GST-Cak1p were included in both incubations (lanes 5 and 6). H1 kinase activity was almost as high when Cdc28p-HA was
incubated with GST-Cak1p in the first incubation and with cyclin in the
second incubation (lanes 7 and 8). This result indicated that both
MBP-Clb2p and MBP-Cln2p could bind to and activate Cdc28p-HA that had
been phosphorylated previously on Thr-169. It is unlikely that a
significant fraction of the activity resulted from phosphorylation of
Cdc28p-HA/cyclin complexes during the second incubation by GST-Cak1p
left over from the first incubation because the washing conditions were
sufficient to remove 80-90% of the Cak1p activity (our unpublished
observation). In contrast, activation of Cdc28p-HA was weak when cyclin
was added in the first incubation and GST-Cak1p was added in the second
incubation (lanes 9 and 10). The H1 kinase activity of Cdc28p-HA
incubated first with MBP-Cln2p and then with GST-Cak1p was 95% lower
than when MBP-Cln2p and GST-Cak1p were added together (compare lanes 6 and 10). Cdc28p-HA/MBP-Clb2p activity was reduced by 80% but was still
significantly above background (compare lanes 5 and 9).
|
To explore this result further, we first considered the possibility
that prebound cyclin might interfere with the phosphorylation of
Cdc28p-HA by GST-Cak1p. Such an effect has been observed with the use
of budding yeast Cak1p, human Cdk2, and human cyclin A; monomeric Cdk2
is an excellent substrate for Cak1p, but Cdk2/cyclin A complexes are
phosphorylated inefficiently (Kaldis et al., 1998b
). By
analogy, preincubation of cyclin with Cdc28p-HA might lead to the
formation of unphosphorylated Cdc28p-HA complexes that would resist
phosphorylation by GST-Cak1p. To examine this possibility, we incubated
Cdc28p-HA beads with or without cyclin and assayed the subsequent
phosphorylation of Cdc28p-HA by GST-Cak1p in the presence of
radiolabeled ATP (Figure 6A).
Surprisingly, we found that our standard concentration of cyclin did
not inhibit the phosphorylation of Cdc28p-HA by GST-Cak1p under these
conditions (Figure 6A, compare lane 1 with lanes 2 and 3). Although
this result could imply that GST-Cak1p phosphorylates Cdc28p-HA/cyclin complexes (unlike the situation with Cdk2 and cyclin A), it is also
possible that cyclin binds so weakly to unphosphorylated Cdc28p-HA that
little Cdc28p is bound to cyclin in the steady state. If the failure of
cyclin to block Cdc28p phosphorylation by GST-Cak1p were due to its
weak binding to Cdc28p, we should be able to drive complex formation
and induce inhibition of the phosphorylation of Cdc28p at higher ratios
of cyclin to Cdc28p. To test this idea, we incubated
Cdc28p-his6 with increasing amounts of MBP-Clb2p
(from no cyclin to a 43-fold molar excess) and measured the
phosphorylation of Cdc28p-his6 by GST-Cak1p
(Figure 6B). Cdc28p-his6 phosphorylation was
unaffected by as much as an 11-fold excess of Clb2p; however, in the
presence of higher levels of MBP-Clb2p, Cdc28p-his6 phosphorylation was inhibited. A
43-fold excess of Clb2p inhibited phosphorylation by 65%. In our
standard assay (Figures 5 and 6A), we used equimolar amounts of Clb2p
and Cdc28p, well below the threshold necessary to induce inhibition of
Thr-169 phosphorylation. We concluded that, like Cdk2/cyclin A,
Cdc28p/Clb2p was inefficiently phosphorylated by Cak1p, but cyclin had
no effect on phosphorylation under our normal assay conditions because
it was not present in high enough amounts to form stable complexes with
unphosphorylated Cdc28p.
|
A second explanation for the poor activation of Cdc28p in the order-of-addition experiment (Figure 5) when cyclin was preincubated with Cdc28p is that cyclin dissociated from Cdc28p during washing. This explanation would be consistent with the apparently weak binding inferred from our previous experiment (Figure 6B). To determine whether washing was responsible for the low Cdc28p activity, we incubated Cdc28p-HA beads with cyclin and then with GST-Cak1p with or without an intervening wash to remove unbound cyclin (Figure 6C). When the beads were washed between the cyclin and GST-Cak1p incubations, Cdc28p-HA activation by both MBP-Clb2p and MBP-Cln2p was poorer than when the wash was omitted (Figure 6C, compare lanes 10-12 with lanes 7-9). Cdc28p-HA/MBP-Cln2p activity was much more sensitive to washing than was Cdc28p-HA/MBP-Clb2p activity. Thus, cyclin, particularly MBP-Cln2p, appears to bind weakly to unphosphorylated Cdc28p-HA. It should be emphasized that all samples in the H1 kinase assays shown in both Figures 5 and 6 were washed immediately before the H1 kinase assay step, demonstrating that complexes of cyclin with phosphorylated Cdc28p-HA were not easily disrupted by washing.
Dependence of Cyclin Binding on Thr-169 Phosphorylation In Vivo
Our in vitro results suggested that cyclin might bind
preferentially to phosphorylated Cdc28p. To test this prediction in vivo, we performed gel filtration on extracts of cells expressing endogenous Cdc28p together with Cdc28p-HA or
Cdc28pT169A-HA and immunoblotted with
the
-PSTAIR antibody to detect both the tagged and untagged forms of
Cdc28p. If cyclin bound less well to unphosphorylated Cdc28p in vivo,
we would expect to see that Cdc28pT169A-HA would
not form complexes as efficiently as wild-type Cdc28p-HA. In both
strains, the untagged wild-type Cdc28p eluted in two peaks: a peak of
monomer in fractions 16 and 17 and a peak of Cdc28p-containing complexes in fractions 13 and 14 (Figure
7A). Wild-type Cdc28p-HA had a similar
distribution (Figure 7A). Although Cdc28pT169A-HA
was expressed at least as well as wild-type Cdc28p-HA (compare the
amounts of HA-tagged protein in fractions 16 and 17 in the top and
bottom panels), less of the T169A mutant formed complexes (compare
fractions 13 and 14 in the top and bottom panels). This result suggests
that Thr-169 phosphorylation enhances cyclin binding, although we
cannot exclude a subtle effect of the T169A mutation on the folding of
Cdc28p.
|
To examine the ability of Cdc28pT169A-HA to interact with a particular cyclin in vivo, we performed a coprecipitation experiment (Figure 7B). We prepared extracts from strains expressing Clb2p tagged with the MYC epitope (Clb2p-MYC9) along with wild-type Cdc28p-HA (WT) or Cdc28pT169A-HA (T169A), immunoprecipitated the Clb2p-MYC9 with antibodies against the MYC epitope tag, and compared the levels of Cdc28p-HA and Cdc28pT169A-HA that coprecipitated with the cyclin by immunoblotting. We found that the WT and T169A forms of Cdc28p-HA were expressed at similar levels in the total extracts (Figure 7B, top) and that Clb2p-MYC9 was immunoprecipitated from both strains with equal efficiency (7B, middle). However, although we found significant amounts of wild-type Cdc28p-HA associated with Clb2p-MYC9, Cdc28pT169A-HA coprecipitated poorly. There was no Clb2p-MYC9 or Cdc28p-HA in the immunoprecipitate from a strain that did not express MYC-tagged Clb2p (no MYC). Thus, the T169A mutation seems to impair the ability of Cdc28p to associate with Clb2p in vivo. These results are consistent with our in vitro findings, and together, our data support a model in which Thr-169 phosphorylation of Cdc28p increases its affinity for cyclins.
| |
DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
We studied the regulation of Cdc28p by Cak1p and cyclins. In
agreement with previous data, we found that most of the Cdc28p in the
cell was monomeric and that the small percentage that was in complexes
contributed all of the histone H1 kinase activity (Wittenberg and Reed,
1988
). However, essentially all of the Cdc28p, including monomeric
Cdc28p, was highly phosphorylated on Thr-169 throughout the mitotic
cell cycle. Cells in stationary phase and cells undergoing synchronous
meiosis, two conditions in which Cak1p levels change dramatically
(Kaldis et al., 1998a
), also exhibited no change in the
stoichiometry of Cdc28p phosphorylation (our unpublished observations).
Our in vitro assays revealed that Cdc28p prephosphorylated on Thr-169
was efficiently activated by both Clb2p and Cln2p; in contrast, cyclin
bound weakly to unphosphorylated Cdc28p. Furthermore, monomeric Cdc28p
was efficiently phosphorylated by Cak1p, whereas Cdc28p/cyclin
complexes, formed when cyclin was present in high enough amounts to
drive complex formation, were not. Together, our data indicate that the
activation pathway for the bulk of Cdc28p in the cell involves
phosphorylation by Cak1p followed by binding to cyclin. It appears that
Cak1p maintains a large pool of highly phosphorylated Cdc28p, which is
available for immediate activation by cyclins.
Previous studies with the Cdc28pT169E mutant had
reached contradictory conclusions regarding the role of Thr-169
phosphorylation in cyclin binding (Lim et al., 1996
; Cross
and Levine, 1998
). Lim et al. (1996)
found that
Cdc28pT169E bound poorly to Cln2p and proposed
that G1 cyclins preferentially bound to unphosphorylated Cdc28p. On the
other hand, Cross and Levine (1998)
identified additional mutations in
Cdc28pT169E that allowed it to bind cyclins and
drive the cell cycle in spite of the T169E mutation. Our results
suggest that Thr-169 phosphorylation is required for tight binding of
Cln2p to Cdc28p. It appears that the T169E mutation is a weak mimic of
constitutive phosphorylation and that it may induce structural changes
that affect cyclin binding.
Several lines of evidence suggest that, in other eukaryotes, Cdks are
activated by a pathway in which they first form complexes with cyclins
and are subsequently phosphorylated by CAK. Many Cdks do not require
activating phosphorylation to bind to cyclins in vitro or in vivo.
Unphosphorylated Cdk2 forms stable complexes with cyclins A and E in
vitro (Desai et al., 1995
). Human Cdc2 does not require
activating phosphorylation to bind to cyclin B in vitro (Desai et
al., 1995
), and mutation of the activating threonine of
Xenopus Cdc2 does not impair its ability to form complexes
with cyclin B in egg extract (Solomon et al., 1992
). Conversely, cyclin binding stimulates the activating phosphorylation of
Cdks. Recombinant Cdc2 is efficiently phosphorylated by endogenous CAK
in insect cell lysate only in the presence of cyclin B (Desai et
al., 1992
), and the addition of cyclin A stimulates the
phosphorylation of Cdk2 by purified human CAK (Fisher and Morgan, 1994
;
Kaldis et al., 1998b
). Cdc2 is not phosphorylated in
Xenopus egg extracts that lack cyclin but quickly becomes
phosphorylated upon cyclin addition (Solomon et al., 1992
).
Unlike budding yeast Cdc28p, Cdc2 in other organisms may be
dephosphorylated after cyclin degradation. Xenopus Cdc2
shifts to a lower-mobility form that is consistent with
dephosphorylation of its activating threonine, Thr-161, at the end of
mitosis (Lorca et al., 1992
). Cyclin-bound Cdc2 is not
dephosphorylated, thereby restricting the onset of dephosphorylation until after anaphase, when cyclins are degraded (Lorca et
al., 1992
). Fission yeast Cdc2 is unphosphorylated when cells are
arrested in G1 after nitrogen starvation (Simanis and Nurse, 1986
).
Genetic data further suggest that fission yeast cells that cannot
dephosphorylate the activating threonine are defective in mitotic exit.
A mutant form of Cdc2 in which its activating threonine was changed to glutamate (T167E) allowed cells to complete the G1/S and G2/M transitions, but they had multiple septa and nuclei as a result of
failure to complete late mitotic events (Gould et al.,
1991
).
The strikingly different activation pathways in budding yeast and other
eukaryotes are consistent with the properties of their different CAKs.
Unlike monomeric Cak1p, CAKs in other organisms consist of a catalytic
subunit (Cdk7), a regulatory subunit (cyclin H), and, in some cases, an
assembly factor (Mat1; reviewed by Kaldis, 1999
). The two types of CAKs
also differ in their functional properties in ways that suggest that
they may be specialized for different Cdk activation pathways. For
example, Cdk/cyclin complexes are excellent substrates for Cdk7/cyclin
H, whereas monomeric Cdks are phosphorylated very poorly by this enzyme
(Fisher and Morgan, 1994
; Kaldis et al., 1998b
). Cak1p, on
the other hand, efficiently phosphorylates monomeric Cdks but not
Cdk/cyclin complexes (Kaldis et al., 1998b
). In keeping with
these different substrate preferences, unphosphorylated Cdk2 binds
strongly to cyclin A, stimulating phosphorylation by Cdk7/cyclin H
(Kaldis et al., 1998b
). In contrast, the weak binding of
cyclin to unphosphorylated Cdc28p that we observed results in a large
steady-state pool of free Cdc28p, the preferred form for
phosphorylation by Cak1p. Cak1p and Cdk7/cyclin H also have strikingly
different subcellular localizations: Cdk7/cyclin H is nuclear, whereas
Cak1p is predominantly cytoplasmic (Tassan et al., 1994
;
Jordan et al., 1997
; Kaldis et al., 1998a
). Many
cyclins are nuclear proteins or at least translocate to the nucleus
during the period of the cell cycle when they function (reviewed by
Pines, 1995
). If cyclin binding promotes the nuclear localization of
Cdks, the timing of cyclin binding relative to CAK phosphorylation
would dictate the appropriate localization of the CAK. In budding
yeast, a cytoplasmic CAK would be required to phosphorylate cytoplasmic
Cdc28p monomers (Wittenberg et al., 1987
). In other
organisms, cyclin binding would lead to the nuclear import of
unphosphorylated Cdks, so a nuclear CAK would be required to activate
them. In summary, budding yeast Cak1p and Cdk7/cyclin H may be very
different because their substrates
monomeric Cdks and Cdk/cyclin
complexes, respectively
are very different.
It is unclear why Cdc28p would possess a site of activating
phosphorylation if it is constitutively phosphorylated and never used
in a regulatory manner. Similar questions had been asked about the
inhibitory phosphorylation sites of Cdc28p. Although other organisms
use these sites as a way of restraining mitosis during every cell cycle
or as part of the response to DNA damage, they are not required for
these processes in budding yeast (Amon et al., 1992
; Sorger
and Murray, 1992
; Coleman and Dunphy, 1994
). Then it was discovered
that inhibitory phosphorylation of Cdc28p was required for a checkpoint
that monitors the synchrony of the budding and nuclear division cycles
and a second checkpoint that monitors cytokinesis (Lew and Reed, 1995
;
Sia et al., 1996
; Barral et al., 1999
). Although
we found in this work that activation of two well-characterized
checkpoints
the unreplicated DNA checkpoint by HU and the spindle
assembly checkpoint by benomyl
did not influence Thr-169
phosphorylation, perhaps there is another checkpoint pathway that
affects the activating phosphorylation site.
Although these experiments have highlighted differences between Cdk
activation in budding yeast and other organisms, they do not offer any
clue regarding why the components of the cell cycle machinery, which
are highly conserved, are not used in the same order in all organisms.
Neither situation seems to have an advantage from a regulatory point of
view. Both Cak1p and Cdk7/cyclin H are active throughout the cell cycle
(reviewed by Kaldis, 1999
), and each can act as soon as its substrate
(monomeric Cdc28p in budding yeast and Cdk/cyclin complexes in other
organisms) becomes available. Therefore, activating phosphorylation
does not appear to be rate limiting for Cdk activation in either case.
It would be interesting to know whether the different Cdk activation
pathways used by budding yeast and other organisms offer their
respective organisms any benefits or if they are simply two equivalent
solutions to the problem of activating cell cycle regulatory kinases.
| |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
We thank M. Cismowski and S.I. Reed for the
Cdc28p-his6 strain (PKY171), A. Cheng for
purified GST-Ptc2p and GST-Ptc3p, F. Cross for the
CLN2(MYC9) plasmid (pAG5) and strains
1834-2A and 1834-1B, R. Deshaies for the MBP-CLB2 expression
plasmid, E. Egan for the MBP-CLN2 expression plasmid,
purified Cks1p, and purified MBP-Clb2p, J.W. Harper for the Cdc28p-HA
baculovirus, the W.M. Keck Foundation Biotechnology Resource Center for
synthesis of the Cdc28p phosphopeptide, J. Sedivy for the
-MYC
antibody, W. Seufert for the CLB2(HA) plasmid (pWS945), A. Sutton for the CDC28 plasmid (PKB341) and the
cak1-22 strain (SY89), and C. Wittenberg for the
CDC28(HA) (CWB174) and
CDC28(HA)T169A (CWB186) plasmids. We are
also grateful to A. Natrillo for technical assistance and to J. Burton, A. Cheng, A. Natrillo, D. Ostapenko, and V. Tsakraklides for
helpful discussions and critical reading of the manuscript. This work
was supported by a fellowship from the Bristol-Myers Squibb Educational
Alliance (K.E.R.), a long-term fellowship from the Swiss National
Science Foundation (P.K.), and grants from the American Heart
Association, Heritage Affiliate, Inc. (M.J.S.), and the National
Institutes of Health (grant GM47830 to M.J.S.).
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
Corresponding authors. E-mail
addresses: mark.solomon{at}yale.edu, solomon.lab{at}yale.edu.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|