|
|
|
|
Vol. 12, Issue 1, 201-219, January 2001
Sinsheimer Labs, Department of Molecular, Cellular, and Developmental Biology, University of California, Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, California 95064
Submitted May 30, 2000; Revised September 12, 2000; Accepted November 8, 2000| |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
We have used affinity chromatography to identify proteins that interact with Nap1, a protein previously shown to play a role in mitosis. Our studies demonstrate that a highly conserved protein called Sda1 binds to Nap1 both in vitro and in vivo. Loss of Sda1 function causes cells to arrest uniformly as unbudded cells that do not increase significantly in size. Cells arrested by loss of Sda1 function have a 1N DNA content, fail to produce the G1 cyclin Cln2, and remain responsive to mating pheromone, indicating that they arrest in G1 before Start. Expression of CLN2 from a heterologous promoter in temperature-sensitive sda1 cells induces bud emergence and polarization of the actin cytoskeleton, but does not induce cell division, indicating that the sda1 cell cycle arrest phenotype is not due simply to a failure to produce the G1 cyclins. The Sda1 protein is absent from cells arrested in G0 and is expressed before Start when cells reenter the cell cycle, further suggesting that Sda1 functions before Start. Taken together, these findings reveal that Sda1 plays a critical role in G1 events. In addition, these findings suggest that Nap1 is likely to function during G1. Consistent with this, we have found that Nap1 is required for viability in cells lacking the redundant G1 cyclins Cln1 and Cln2. In contrast to a previous study, we have found no evidence that Sda1 is required for the assembly or function of the actin cytoskeleton. Further characterization of Sda1 is likely to provide important clues to the poorly understood mechanisms that control passage through G1.
| |
INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Entry into the eukaryotic cell cycle occurs at a point in late G1
phase referred to as Start in yeast cells or the Restriction point in
vertebrate cells (Hartwell et al., 1974
; Pardee et
al., 1978
; Cross, 1995
). Once cells pass through Start they become committed to a new round of cell division (Pringle and Hartwell, 1981
).
Entry into the cell cycle is highly regulated and occurs only when
cells have reached a critical size and have received the appropriate
external signals in the form of nutrients or growth factors (Johnston
and Singer, 1990
; Cross, 1995
; Planas-Silva and Weinberg, 1997
). At the
molecular level, entry into the cell cycle is induced by the synthesis
of G1 cyclins, which bind and activate cyclin-dependent kinases to
initiate the events of cell division (Hadwiger et al., 1989
;
Richardson et al., 1989
; Dirick et al., 1995
).
Genetic studies in budding yeast have played an important role in
identifying proteins that are required during G1 for entry into the
cell cycle. Temperature-sensitive mutations that inactivate Cdc28, the
major cyclin-dependent kinase in budding yeast, cause cells to arrest
before passing through Start (Hartwell et al., 1974
; Reed,
1980
). Similarly, loss of function of the G1 cyclins, which activate
Cdc28, results in an arrest before Start (Hadwiger et al.,
1989
; Richardson et al., 1989
). Cells arrested in G1 by loss
of function of Cdc28 or the G1 cyclins continue to increase in size,
indicating that these proteins are not required for cell growth (Reed,
1980
; Cross, 1990
). Mutations in other genes cause cells to arrest
before Start without increasing in size. These include
CDC25, the guanine nucleotide exchange factor for Ras, and
CDC35, which encodes adenylate cyclase (Dawes and Calvert, 1984
; Broek et al., 1987
). Cells arrested by loss of
function of cdc25 or cdc35 undergo a cell cycle
arrest that is similar to the arrest caused by nutrient deprivation,
suggesting a defect in nutrient sensing (Werner-Washburne et
al., 1993
). Studies on these and other genes have demonstrated the
existence of a cAMP-dependent signaling cascade used to link cell cycle
progression to nutrient availability (Hubler et al., 1993
;
Baroni et al., 1994
; Tokiwa et al., 1994
;
Thevelein and de Winde, 1999
).
A number of studies have demonstrated that the G1 cyclin Cln3 plays a
critical role in controlling entry into the cell cycle. For example,
overexpression of Cln3, or mutations that cause stabilization of Cln3,
lead to premature entry into the cell cycle, resulting in decreased
cell size (Cross, 1988
; Nash et al., 1988
; Futcher, 1996
).
Conversely, loss of Cln3 function leads to a delay in cell cycle entry
and an increase in cell size (Cross, 1988
; Tyers et al.,
1993
). Cln3 appears to induce G1-specific expression of a large group
of genes that includes additional G1 cyclins called Cln1 and Cln2
(Cross and Tinkelenberg, 1991
; Tyers et al., 1993
; Dirick
et al., 1995
; Stuart and Wittenberg, 1995
). In the absence of Cln3, transcription of these G1-specific genes is delayed and occurs
by a pathway that requires the function of the Bck2 protein (Di Como
et al., 1995
; Wijnen and Futcher, 1999
). Transcription of
G1-specific genes is regulated by two transcription factor complexes
called SBF and MBF, composed of Swi4 and Swi6, or Mbp1 and Swi6,
respectively (Nasmyth and Dirick, 1991
; Ogas et al., 1991
;
Partridge et al., 1997
). The pathways used to activate the transcription of SBF/MBF-dependent genes are poorly understood, as are
the pathways that regulate the activity of Cln3 and Bck2.
Although a number of key regulators of G1 events have been identified, we still do not understand the molecular mechanisms that integrate cell size and external signals with entry into the cell cycle. A more complete understanding of the molecular mechanisms that control G1 events will require identification of additional proteins that are necessary for entry into the cell cycle. In this study, we have used a biochemical approach to identify a protein called Sda1 that is required for passage through Start in budding yeast. Because Sda1 is a highly conserved protein it may function to control G1 events in all eukaryotic cells.
| |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Yeast Strains
All yeast strains are in the W303 strain background
(leu2-3,112 ura3-52 can1-100 ade2-1 his3-11 trp1-1), with
the exception of the strain used for the two-hybrid screen (YD116:
MATa ade2-101oc can1 gal4-542
gal80-538 his3-
200 leu2-3,112
lys2-801am trp1-901 ura3-52)
(Shulewitz et al., 1999
).
DK96: MAT
,
bar1,
nap1::LEU2
DK186: MATa,
bar1
DK209: MATa/MAT
ZZ6: MATa/MAT
, SDA1/
sda1::HIS3
ZZ13: MATa,
sda1::HIS3, pZZ13 (CEN,
SDA1, URA3)
ZZ28: MATa,
bar1, sda1-2
ZZ35: MATa,
bar1, sda1-2,
nap1::LEU2
ZZ41: MATa,
bar1,
CLN2-3XHA::LEU2
ZZ42: MATa,
bar1, sda1-2,
CLN2-3XHA::LEU2
ZZ60: MATa,
bar1, sda1-2, GAL1-3X
HA-CLN2::HIS5
ZZ66: MATa,
bar1, sda1-2, GAL1-3X
HA-CLN3::HIS5
ZZ99: MATa,
bar1, sda1-2,
CLN2-3XHA::LEU2, pBA263V (CEN, GPD,TRP1)
ZZ100: MATa,
bar1, sda1-2,
CLN2-3XHA::LEU2, pBA1272 (CEN, GPD-SWI4, TRP1)
Biochemical Analysis
Nap1 affinity chromatography and identification of Nap1-binding
proteins were performed as previously described (Altman and Kellogg,
1997
). Coimmunoprecipitation experiments were performed as previously
described (Altman and Kellogg, 1997
). Briefly, immunoaffinity beads
were made by binding 1 µg of affinity-purified antibody per
microliter of protein A beads. A 25-ml culture of rapidly dividing
DK186 (O.D600 of 0.6) was pelleted and
immediately frozen on liquid nitrogen. The cells were broken open by
bead beating for two 40-s intervals, separated by a 60-s incubation on
ice, in the presence of 300 µl of acid-washed glass beads and 600 µl of IP buffer (50 mM K+-HEPES pH 7.6, 150 mM
NaCl, 1 mM EGTA, 1 mM MgCl2, 0.1% Tween-20, 2 µg/ml leupeptin, 2 µg/ml pepstatin, 2 µg/ml chymostatin, 2 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride) at 4°C followed by
centrifugation at 14,000 rpm for 10 min at 4°C. Supernatant (500 µl) was added to 15 µl of antibody-bound beads and rotated for
4 h at 4°C. The beads were washed four times in IP buffer
containing 10% glycerol. Bound proteins were eluted by incubating the
washed beads with 200 µl of IP buffer containing 1.0 M NaCl for 10 min at 20°C followed by a 15-s spin and removal of 150 µl of the
supernatant. The elution step was repeated and the pooled elutions were
trichloroacetic acid (TCA) precipitated, resuspended in 1× protein
loading buffer (65 mM Tris-HCl, pH 6.8, 3% SDS, 5%
-mercaptoethanol, 10% glycerol), and separated on a
SDS-polyacrylamide gel for Western blotting.
Yeast Two-Hybrid Analysis
Yeast two-hybrid analysis was performed as described (Shulewitz
et al., 1999
). Briefly, a Gal4 DNA-binding domain (Gal4-DBD) in-frame fusion to the SDA1 gene was generated by polymerase
chain reaction (PCR) amplifying SDA1 by using the oligos
GCGCGCGCGCATATGATGGGTAGAAGAAGTAGAGC (NdeI site underlined and the Met codon in bold) and
GCGGGATCCCTAATACCCCTTCTTCTTTT (BamHI
site underlined and the stop codon in bold). The PCR product was
ligated into the NdeI and BamHI sites of pAS1
(2µ, TRP1) (Clonetech, Palo Alto, CA), yielding
pAS1-SDA1 in which the Gal4-DBD-SDA1 fusion is expressed
from the constitutive ADH1 promoter. Next, the yeast strain
YD116 containing pAS1-SDA1 was transformed with a library of
yeast cDNAs fused to the carboxyl terminus of the Gal4 transcriptional
activation domain (Gal4-AD) driven from the ADH1 promoter on
a LEU2-marked 2µ plasmid (purchased from the American Type
Culture Collection, Vanassas, VA). Transformants were plated on
-Trp-Leu-Ura+XGal media to select for cells that possessed the
TRP1-marked pAS1-SDA1 and a
LEU2-marked library plasmid, and that stimulated the
expression of the URA3 and lacZ reporter genes.
Candidate plasmids were recovered from yeast, amplified through
Escherichia coli, and retested for activation of the
URA3 and lacZ reporter genes by using the strain
YD116 containing pAS1-SDA1. Specificity was confirmed by
failure of the candidates to stimulate reporter expression in the
absence of pAS1-SDA1. Partial nucleotide sequence of the
candidate genes was obtained and then identified by comparison to the
Saccharomyces cerevisiae Genome Database (Stanford
University). We repeatedly identified NAP1 in this screen.
Generation of Temperature-sensitive sda1 Alleles
A deletion of the SDA1 gene was generated by a
one-step gene disruption technique described previously (Guthrie and
Fink, 1991
). Briefly, the HIS3 gene was amplified from
pRS423 by PCR with oligos possessing homology to regions 40 bp upstream
of the SDA1 Start codon and 40 bp downstream of the
SDA1 stop codon (oligos: AAGACGCACTGAATATACCAATCAAGGGCATCAACAATGGG
-TAGAAGAAGCGGCATCAGAGCAGATTG and
GTGTATATGT-ATGTATATATTAATATGGCTACGATGTCGTCTAATACCCCG
-TGCGGTATTTCACACCG). The PCR product was transformed into the
diploid strain DK209 and a transformant carrying a single
SDA1 deletion was identified by selection on -His media and
PCR analysis to create strain ZZ6.
To generate temperature sensitive sda1 alleles, a haploid strain dependent upon SDA1 carried on a CEN plasmid marked with the URA3 gene was generated. A DNA fragment containing the SDA1 open reading frame and 1000 bp upstream from the Start codon and 1000 bp downstream of the stop codon was amplified by PCR and cloned into the SacI and BamHI sites of YCplac33 (URA3) (oligos: GCGGAGCTCGAAAGAGAACGAATCTGGGC and GCGGGATCCGCATCTGGGGTTCTCTCAGC; SacI and BamHI sites underlined) to create pZZ13. This DNA fragment was also cloned into the SacI and BamHI sites of YCplac22 (TRP1) to create pZZ15. We then transformed the diploid yeast strain ZZ6 with pZZ13, induced sporulation, and selected a haploid that contained both the deletion of SDA1 and pZZ13 to generate strain ZZ13.
To mutagenize SDA1, the SDA1 coding sequence from
nucleotides +190 to +1891 was amplified by PCR under mutagenic
conditions as described (Muhlrad et al., 1992
) (oligos:
CGATGTAGGAAATGGATCTT and GCAATTTCACGGAAGGCAGC). A gapped-plasmid was
created by digesting pZZ15 with AflII (cuts at +392) and
BstEII (cuts at +1724). Next, the yeast strain ZZ13 was
cotransformed with the mutagenized SDA1 PCR product and the
gapped-pZZ15 plasmid. Transformants were selected on -Trp media, and
cells that had lost the wild-type copy of SDA1 were selected by replica
plating onto plates containing 5-fluoro-orotic acid. Temperature
sensitive mutants were identified by screening for colonies that grew
at 20°C but not at 37°C. To confirm that the mutagenized
sda1-containing plasmids were responsible for the
temperature-sensitive phenotype, the plasmids were recovered from
yeast, amplified through E. coli, and then transformed back into the yeast strain ZZ13 for plasmid-shuffling and rescreening for
temperature sensitivity (Guthrie and Fink, 1991
).
The 10 temperature-sensitive sda1 mutant alleles were
integrated into the genome at the SDA1 locus by a two-step
gene replacement technique (Guthrie and Fink, 1991
). Briefly,
mutagenized sda1 was excised from the YCplac22 vector by
using BamHI and SacI, and then cloned into the
BamHI and SacI sites of the integrating vector
YIplac211 (URA3). This construct was linearized with
BglII to direct the integration of the sda1
temperature-sensitive allele to the chromosomal SDA1 locus,
and was transformed into DK186, resulting in strains possessing a
wild-type copy of SDA1 and a temperature-sensitive copy of
sda1. The transformants were selected on
Ura plates and
then streaked onto YPD to allow for recombination within the
SDA1 coding regions, resulting in the looping out of a copy
of SDA1 and the URA3 gene. Colonies that had lost
the URA3 gene were selected on 5-fluoro-orotic
acid-containing media, and then screened for temperature sensitivity to
identify cells carrying the sda1 temperature-sensitive
mutant allele.
Cell Cycle Arrests, Viability Assays, and Observation of Individual Cells
Cells were arrested in G0 by growth at 20°C for 6 d or at
30°C for 4 d in either liquid or solid YPD media. Strains were
arrested in G1 with 1 µg/ml
factor for 3 h at 30°C or in
G2/M with 30 µg/ml benomyl for 3 h at 30°C.
Viability assays were performed by plating 1 × 103 cells on 37°C prewarmed plates followed by incubation at the restrictive temperature (37°C) for varying amounts of time. At each time point, the plate was shifted from the restrictive to the permissive temperature (20°C). Colonies were counted after 4 d of growth at the permissive temperature and percentage of viability was determined by comparison with the number of colonies on a control plate incubated at the permissive temperature.
Individual cells were observed by plating onto thin solid media. A section of the media was excised and placed onto a glass slide, and then incubated at the permissive or restrictive temperature. At each time point the slide was quickly viewed under the microscope and the identical field of view was observed each time.
Antibody Production and Western Blotting
Antibodies that recognize Sda1 were raised by immunizing rabbits
with a COOH-terminal fragment of Sda1, purified from bacteria as a
glutathione S-transferase (GST) fusion protein. The
COOH-terminal fragment was amplified by PCR and cloned into the
BamHI and EcoRI sites of pGEX-1 to create pZZ8,
which expresses the COOH-terminal fragment as a GST fusion (Amersham
Pharmacia Biotech, Piscataway, NJ; oligos:
GCGGGATCCGGAACTAAGCGATGACG and
GCGGAATTCCTAATACCCCTTCTTCTTTTG; BamHI
and EcoRI sites underlined and the stop codon in bold). An
identical fragment of Sda1 was cloned into the BamHI and
EcoRI sites of pMAL-c2 to create pZZ6, which expresses the
COOH-terminal fragment as an MBP fusion (New England Biolabs, Beverly,
MA). Sda1 antibodies were affinity purified from serum by using the purified Sda1-MBP fusion protein coupled to Affi-gel 10 (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA) as previously described (Kellogg and Alberts, 1992
).
SDS-PAGE and Western blotting were carried out as previously described
(Anderson et al., 1973
; Harlow and Lane, 1988
). For all
Western blots, 1.6-ml samples of culture at
O.D600 of 0.6 were taken at each of the indicated
time points. The cells were then rapidly pelleted in a 1.8-ml screw-cap
tube, the supernatant was removed, and the tube was frozen on liquid
nitrogen. After all of the samples were collected, 150 µl of glass
beads was added to each tube followed by 125 µl of 1× protein gel
sample buffer containing 2 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride. The tubes
were immediately placed in a Biospec Multibeater-8 and beaten at top speed for 2 min, centrifuged briefly, and immediately boiled in a heat
block for 5 min. After centrifugation for 1 min, 15 µl of each sample
was loaded onto a 10% SDS-polyacrylamide gel for Western blotting.
Immunofluorescence and Northern Blots
Actin staining was performed by fixing cells at room temperature in 37% formaldehyde at a final concentration of 3.7% for 1 h, washing twice in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), and then rotating for 30 min in PBS containing 0.5% Tween. Afterward, the cells were washed twice in PBS and rotated in PBS containing rhodamine-phalloidin at a concentration of 0.3 µM in the dark for 1.5 h. After staining, the cells were washed three times in PBS and then resuspended in PBS containing one-tenth volume mounting solution (1 mg/ml phenylene-diamine, 90% glycerol, 0.1 M Tris-HCl, pH 8.8) before viewing by fluorescence microscopy.
Staining of mitotic spindles and DNA was carried out as previously
described (Pringle et al., 1991
). Northern blots were
carried out as previously described (Kellogg and Murray, 1995
).
Generation of HA-tagged Cln2 and Galactose-inducible Cln2 and Cln3
Galactose-driven 3XHA-tagged CLN2 and
3XHA-tagged CLN3 strains were generated by one-step
replacement of the endogenous promoter with the GAL1 promoter followed
by a triple HA tag fused in frame with either CLN2 or
CLN3 coding regions as described (Longtine et
al., 1998
) (oligos for CLN2:
ACTCTATAGCTGCCAATTCATTCGCTTACCACA-TCATAATGAATTCGAGCTCGTTTAAAC and
TGATGACGAGTCC-CATACGGGGTCTTGGTTCAGCACTAGCGCACTGAGCAGCGTAA-TCTG; oligos for CLN3:
CTCCTCTGCATTTCTTTTCTGACCC-ATAGCATTTCTTACAGAATTCGAGCTCGTTTAAAC and
TTGCATTAGCGTATCTAATTATGGTATCCTTCAATATGGCGCACT-GAGCAGCGTAATCTG). For the experiment shown in Figure 9, strains were grown to
saturation in YEP media containing 2% glycerol and 2% ethanol and
were released from the nutrient arrest into YEP media containing 2%
galactose. CLN2 at the endogenous locus was tagged with 3XHA
at the COOH terminus by using pCLN2HA3 (gift of R. Deshaies, California
Institute of Technology).
Flow Cytometry
Cells were prepared for flow cytometry by fixing in 70% ethanol for 30 min to overnight at room temperature. Cells were then washed twice in 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, resuspended in 500 µl of 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 10 µg/ml DNase-free RNase, and incubated at 37°C for 1-4 h. The cells were pelleted, resuspended in 500 µl of 200 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 200 mM NaCL, 78 mM MgCl2, and sonicated for 10 s on "low." After sonication, 1.5 µl of 10 mg/ml propidium iodide was added and the cells were stored overnight at 4°C or analyzed immediately.
| |
RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Sda1 Interacts with Nap1
In previous work we found that Nap1 binds to Gin4 and Clb2, two
proteins involved in the control of mitotic events (Kellogg et
al., 1995
; Altman and Kellogg, 1997
). To learn more about the in
vivo functions of Nap1, we have used affinity chromatography to
identify additional Nap1-interacting proteins. For these experiments, a
purified full-length Nap1 fusion protein was covalently coupled to a
column matrix to create an affinity column (Altman and Kellogg, 1997
).
The column was loaded with a crude extract made from log phase yeast
cells, washed extensively with buffer, and eluted with a gradient of
increasing salt. The eluted proteins were then analyzed by SDS-PAGE
(Figure 1A). The Gin4 protein kinase is
one of the proteins that binds to the Nap1 affinity column (Figure 1A,
arrow), and a variety of experiments have demonstrated that Nap1 and
Gin4 function together in vivo (Altman and Kellogg, 1997
). In this
study, we have analyzed a 98-kDa protein that elutes from the Nap1
affinity column at ~0.7 M KCl (Figure 1A, arrow). Analysis of this
protein by mass spectrometry identified it as the open reading frame
YGR245c, which has recently been given the name Sda1 (Buscemi et
al., 2000
). Western blot experiments with an anti-Sda1 antibody
confirmed that Sda1 binds quantitatively to the Nap1 affinity column
and elutes only under high salt conditions (Figure 1B). We also found
that Nap1 binds to a Sda1-GST affinity column (our unpublished
data), and that Sda1 and Nap1 coprecipitate (Figure 1C).
Finally, we carried out a two-hybrid screen to find proteins that
interact with Sda1 and repeatedly identified Nap1 (Figure 1D). Taken
together, these results provide strong evidence that Sda1 interacts
with Nap1 in vivo.
|
Sda1 Is Required for Passage through G1 from a G0 Arrest
Previous work has demonstrated that SDA1 is an
essential gene (Buscemi et al., 2000
). As a first step
toward analyzing the function of Sda1 we generated a diploid strain
that is heterozygous for a deletion of the SDA1 gene.
Sporulation of this diploid yielded two viable spores and two inviable
spores, as expected. Interestingly, examination of the inviable
sda1 spores revealed that in every case they remained as
single unbudded cells that failed to increase in size, suggesting that
Sda1 has an essential role in entry into the cell cycle.
To further analyze the function of Sda1, we generated
temperature-sensitive mutants by using error-prone PCR mutagenesis and plasmid shuffling techniques (see MATERIALS AND METHODS). We identified 10 temperature-sensitive sda1 mutant alleles that grow
normally at the permissive temperature (20°C) but completely fail to
grow at the restrictive temperature (37°C). The temperature-sensitive sda1 alleles were integrated at the SDA1
chromosomal locus, replacing the wild-type SDA1 gene. All of
the temperature-sensitive sda1 alleles are recessive and can
be rescued by wild-type SDA1 supplied on a low copy CEN
plasmid or in a heterozygous diploid (Figure 2; our unpublished data). For the
studies described below we show the results for the sda1-2
allele, although we have tested multiple alleles in each experiment and
have obtained identical results.
|
We used the temperature-sensitive sda1 alleles to determine
the phenotype caused by inactivation of Sda1 function by two different approaches. Because haploid spores carrying a deletion of the SDA1 gene fail to enter the cell cycle, we hypothesized that
Sda1 is required for entry into the cell cycle. Therefore, we first tested whether temperature-sensitive sda1 cells released
from a G0 arrest are able to reenter the cell cycle at the restrictive temperature. We arrested wild-type and sda1-2 cells in G0 by
nutrient depletion and then transferred them to fresh media at either
the permissive or restrictive temperature. Cell proliferation was monitored by measuring the O.D.600 of the
cultures over a period of 24 h (Figure
3A). We found that the sda1-2
cells proliferated at the permissive temperature in a manner nearly
identical to the wild-type control strain. However, at the restrictive
temperature the sda1-2 cells completely failed to
proliferate. Bud emergence was also monitored during this experiment by
determining the percentage of cells with buds at each time point
(Figure 3B). At the permissive temperature, both wild-type and
sda1-2 cells underwent bud emergence after 6 h. At the
restrictive temperature, wild-type cells underwent bud emergence after
4 h; however, the sda1-2 cells completely failed to
undergo bud emergence and >98% remained as unbudded cells (Figures 3,
B and C). Interestingly, the sda1-2 cells do not
significantly increase in size at the restrictive temperature. This
result distinguishes sda1 mutants from cells lacking the function of Cdc28 or the G1 cyclins, which fail to pass through Start
but continue to increase in size (Reed, 1980
; Hadwiger et al., 1989
; Richardson et al., 1989
). To further confirm
that the sda1-2 cells fail to reenter the cell cycle from a
G0 arrest, we followed the behavior of individual nutrient-arrested
cells plated onto fresh media at the restrictive temperature. Again, we
found that >98% of the sda1-2 cells failed to initiate
budding at the restrictive temperature (Figure 3D). Flow cytometry
analysis demonstrated that sda1-2 cells do not undergo DNA
replication when released from a G0 arrest into fresh media at the
restrictive temperature (Figure 3E). The sda1-2 cells remain
nearly 100% viable during the 24-h incubation at the restrictive
temperature, as determined by a cell viability assay (Figure 3F).
|
The unbudded sda1-2 arrest phenotype suggested a possible
defect in the actin cytoskeleton, because actin is required for bud
emergence and bud growth (Pruyne and Bretscher, 2000
). In addition,
recent work has suggested that Sda1 is required for assembly or
maintenance of cortical actin patches (Buscemi et al.,
2000
). Therefore, we used rhodamine-phalloidin to observe actin
organization in the sda1-2 cells released from a G0 arrest at the restrictive temperature. Actin organization cannot be viewed in
G0-arrested cells due to the presence of a thick cell wall that is
resistant to enzymatic degradation and impermeable to phalloidin. Cells
that have exited G0 reorganize their cell wall and become permeable to
phalloidin. We could therefore use phalloidin staining to monitor both
exit from G0 and the structure of the actin cytoskeleton. G0-arrested
wild-type and sda1-2 cells were released into fresh media at
the restrictive temperature and actin structures were observed over a
period of 24 h. We found that wild-type cells became permeable to
phalloidin 2 h before the sda1-2 cells; however, by
15 h 85% of both the wild-type and sda1-2 cells showed
actin staining, indicating that both strains exited G0 (Figure
4A). The actin cytoskeleton in
sda1-2 cells at the restrictive temperature consisted of
randomly distributed actin patches and cables, similar to a cell in G1
before bud emergence. The actin structures in the sda1-2
cells remained the same throughout the 24 h time course.
|
We also performed DNA and tubulin staining on the wild-type and sda1-2 cells incubated at the restrictive temperature to observe nuclear morphology and microtubule organization (Figure 4B). After 15 h at the restrictive temperature the wild-type cells were in all stages of the cell cycle, whereas 95% of the sda1-2 cells arrested with a single nucleus and an interphase array of microtubules, indicative of a G1 arrest.
Rapidly Growing sda1-2 Mutant Cells Arrest in G1 at the Restrictive Temperature
Our results demonstrate that Sda1 is required for
G0-arrested cells to reenter the cell cycle. Next, we wished to
determine the phenotype caused by inactivation of Sda1 in rapidly
dividing cells shifted from the permissive to the restrictive
temperature. We found that all 10 of our temperature-sensitive
sda1 alleles fail to undergo a rapid arrest when shifted to
37°C, as previously reported for an independently isolated
sda1 temperature-sensitive allele (Buscemi et
al., 2000
). Upon the shift to the restrictive temperature, the
sda1-2 cells continued to proliferate at a rate similar to
wild-type for 6 h (Figure 5A).
During this period of proliferation, the sda1-2 culture
contained cells in all stages of the cell cycle, as indicated by the
presence of cells with differently sized daughter buds. However, after
6 h at the restrictive temperature the sda1-2 cells
began to proliferate more slowly until they arrested at ~12 h (Figure
5A). The sda1-2 culture started to accumulate unbudded cells
after 4 h and by 12 h the culture uniformly arrested as
unbudded cells (Figure 5B).
|
Because the sda1-2 arrest occurred over an extended period
of time, we wished to determine the number of cell divisions the sda1-2 mutant underwent before arresting at the restrictive
temperature. Rapidly growing sda1-2 cells were plated onto
prewarmed media at the restrictive temperature and individual cells
were observed over a 24-h period. We found that the sda1-2
cells underwent an average of three to four rounds of cell division at
the restrictive temperature before arresting as a cluster of 8 to 16 cells after 15 h (Figure 5C). Use of a microneedle to disrupt the
cluster of arrested sda1-2 cells revealed that they arrested
as unbudded cells of a uniform size. The rapidly growing
sda1-2 mutant cells shifted to the restrictive
temperature remained viable for over 24 h, as was found for the
previously reported temperature sensitive sda1-1 allele
(Buscemi et al., 2000
).
We next observed the actin cytoskeleton in rapidly growing sda1-2 shifted to the restrictive temperature. We found that sda1-2 cells possess normal cortical actin patches and cytoplasmic cables throughout the duration of the 24-h period (Figure 5D). Polarized actin was observed in budding sda1-2 cells until 15 h at the restrictive temperature, at which time the population of sda1-2 cells was uniformly arrested as unbudded cells containing actin patches and cables randomly distributed throughout the cell (Figure 5D). Note that a small fraction of both wild-type and sda1-2 cells failed to stain for actin at both the permissive and restrictive temperatures. We also performed DNA and tubulin staining on identical samples and found that the percentage of sda1-2 cells possessing an interphase array of microtubules increased during the incubation at the restrictive temperature until 95% of the cells arrested with an interphase array of microtubules and a single nucleus at the 15 h time point (our unpublished data).
The Sda1 Protein Is Only Present in Proliferating Cells and Is Synthesized before Start
We next studied the behavior of the Sda1 protein during the cell
cycle. Cells were arrested at different points in the cell cycle:
either in G1 with
factor, in G2/M with the
microtubule-destabilizing drug benomyl, or in G0 by nutrient depletion.
The levels of the Sda1 protein at each cell cycle stage were then
determined using an anti-Sda1 polyclonal antibody (Figure
6A). We also followed the behavior of the
Nap1 protein, and as a cell cycle control we followed the mitotic
cyclin Clb2. The Sda1 protein was present in G1 and G2/M arrested
cells, but completely absent in G0 cells. The Nap1 protein was present
during all stages of the cell cycle, whereas the Clb2 protein was only
present in G2/M cells, as expected. We also followed the behavior of
the Sda1 protein through a complete cell cycle after release from an
factor arrest, and observed no change in protein levels or
noticeable posttranslational modifications of the Sda1 protein (our
unpublished data).
|
Because Sda1 is present in dividing cells but not in G0-arrested cells,
we wished to determine when the Sda1 protein first appears as cells
exit G0 and reenter the cell cycle. Cells that enter the cell cycle and
pass through Start express the G1 cyclins Cln1 and Cln2 (Wittenberg
et al., 1990
). Therefore, we determined when the Sda1
protein first appears relative to the appearance of the Cln2 protein by
using a wild-type strain carrying a 3XHA-tagged version of the
endogenous Cln2. G0-arrested cells were released into fresh media at
30°C and assayed for the appearance of Sda1 and Cln2 (Figure 6B). We
found that the Sda1 protein was first detected after 3 h, whereas
Cln2 does not appear until 5 h, suggesting that Sda1 is produced
before the Start-induced expression of Cln2. To confirm that Sda1
appears before Start, we released G0-arrested cells into fresh media
containing the mating pheromone
factor, which arrests cells before
passage through Start. We found that Sda1 appeared 3 h after the
release into fresh media containing
factor, further confirming that
Sda1 is expressed before Start (Figure 6B). The Cln2 protein failed to
appear in the presence of
factor, confirming that the cells
arrested before passage through Start. We also found that the Sda1
protein appeared with normal kinetics in cdc28-4 cells
released from a G0 arrest into fresh media at 37°C (our unpublished
data). These experiments indicate that Sda1 is produced before
passage through Start, and that Sda1 expression does not require a
fully functional Cdc28 protein.
Newly Synthesized Mutant sda1 Protein Fails to Appear at the Restrictive Temperature
Our results demonstrate that cells lacking Sda1 function fail to pass through G1 when released from a G0 arrest. However, when rapidly dividing cells carrying a temperature sensitive allele of sda1 are shifted to the restrictive temperature they continue to divide for >6 h. Our studies on the behavior of the sda1-2 mutant protein provide an explanation for these differing results.
First, we released G0-arrested wild-type and sda1-2 cells
into fresh media at the permissive or restrictive temperatures and then
assayed Sda1 protein levels every 2 h (Figure
7A). Sda1 appeared after 6 h in both
strains at the permissive temperature. At the restrictive temperature,
wild-type Sda1 protein appeared after 4 h; however, the mutant
sda1-2 protein was barely detectable throughout the time
course. These results suggest that at the restrictive temperature newly
made mutant sda1-1 protein is either unstable or is not
synthesized at normal levels.
|
An additional experiment was performed to supply further evidence for this model. Rapidly dividing cells grown at the permissive temperature were shifted to the restrictive temperature and samples were taken every 5 h for 20 h. At each time point, the cultures were diluted to an O.D.600 of 0.6 to normalize the amount of total protein per sample, and the samples were probed for the Sda1 protein by Western blotting (Figure 7B). Wild-type Sda1 protein remained at constant levels; however, the mutant sda1-2 protein declined after 5 h and by 10 h was barely detectable. These results further suggest that newly made sda1-2 protein is either unstable or not synthesized, whereas preexisting sda1 protein made at the permissive temperature is stable but becomes depleted by continued cell division until cells eventually arrest in G1. We found this to be true for all 10 sda1 alleles.
We confirmed that the lack of Sda1 protein in the mutant strain is not due to a transcription defect by monitoring SDA1 message levels by Northern blot analysis (Figure 7C). The SDA1 mRNA appeared 1 h after release into fresh media from a G0 arrest at the restrictive temperature in both sda1-2 and wild-type strains, indicating that SDA1 is transcribed normally and that the basic transcriptional machinery is functional in the sda1-2 mutant.
The sda1-2 Mutant Fails to Produce the G1 Cyclins at the Restrictive Temperature
To learn more about the nature of the G1 arrest observed in the
sda1-2 cells, we carried out experiments to determine which of the known molecular events that occur during G1 fail to occur in the
absence of Sda1 activity. An important event in the passage through G1
is the synthesis of the G1 cyclins Cln1, Cln2, and Cln3. Cln3 is
present at low levels during the entire cell cycle, whereas Cln1 and
Cln2 appear specifically during G1 (Wittenberg et al., 1990
;
Tyers et al., 1992
). Furthermore, Cln3 activity triggers
transcription of CLN1 and CLN2, as well as other
G1-specific genes, which leads to passage through Start (Cross and
Tinkelenberg, 1991
; Tyers et al., 1993
; Stuart and
Wittenberg, 1995
; Spellman et al., 1998
). Because
sda1-2 cells arrest in G1, we wished to determine whether G1
cyclins are present in the arrested sda1-2 cells. For these
experiments we generated a sda1-2 strain that contains a
3XHA-tagged version of the endogenous CLN2. G0-arrested wild-type and sda1-2 strains containing Cln2-3XHA were
released into fresh media at the permissive or restrictive temperature and monitored for the appearance of Cln2-3XHA (Figure
8A). At the permissive temperature,
Cln2-3XHA was present at the same level in both wild-type and
sda1-2 cells. At the restrictive temperature, Cln2-3XHA
appeared after 6 h in the wild-type cells, but completely failed
to appear in the sda1-2 cells. We also attempted to
determine whether the G1 cyclin Cln3 is made normally in
sda1-2 cells. Although we were easily able to detect
Cln3-3XHA at the permissive temperature, we were unable to
consistently detect Cln3-3XHA at the restrictive temperature in either
wild-type or sda1-2 cells (our unpublished data).
|
To further confirm that temperature-sensitive sda1 cells fail to synthesize Cln2 at the restrictive temperature, we shifted rapidly growing wild-type and sda1-2 strains containing Cln2-3XHA from the permissive temperature to the restrictive temperature and then assayed Cln2-3XHA levels every 5 h for 20 h. As before, the cultures were diluted to an O.D.600 of 0.6 at each time point to normalize total protein levels (Figure 8B). In the wild-type cells, Cln2-3XHA levels remained constant; however, in the sda1-2 cells, Cln2-3XHA levels declined during the time course and after 15 h the cells arrested without detectable Cln2, indicative of a G1 arrest. In addition, the samples were probed for the mitotic cyclin Clb2 (Figure 8B). The levels of Clb2 in the sda1-2 cells decreased steadily during the time course and eventually disappeared, arguing against a delay in mitosis and further supporting a G1 arrest.
Next, we determined whether the defect in G1 cyclin expression is at the transcriptional level by monitoring the appearance of CLN2 and CLN3 mRNAs after sda1-2 cells were released from a G0 arrest at the restrictive temperature (Figure 8C). Wild-type and sda1-2 cells arrested in G0 were released into fresh media at the restrictive temperature, samples taken every hour for 6 h, and then probed for the presence of the CLN2 and CLN3 transcripts by Northern blotting. Interestingly, the CLN3 transcript appeared with the same kinetics in wild-type cells and sda1-2 cells. In contrast, the levels of the CLN2 transcript were greatly reduced in the sda1-2 mutant cells. We also assayed the appearance of the PCL1 transcript, another gene that is transcribed by the same G1-specific transcription factors as CLN1 and CLN2 (Figure 8D). As with CLN2, we found that the PCL1 transcript failed to appear as cells exited G0, whereas the levels of control transcripts (TUB2 and CDC28) were unaffected.
Expression of CLN2 Induces Budding in Arrested sda1-2 Cells
Because sda1-2 cells fail to transcribe CLN2
at the restrictive temperature, we asked whether the expression of
CLN2 from a heterologous promoter could rescue the
sda1-2 phenotype. For these experiments, a sda1-2
strain was constructed that contained a 3XHA-tagged version of the
endogenous CLN2 gene under the control of the
GAL1 promoter. We first determined that the Gal1-driven HA-tagged Cln2 protein was being made at equivalent amounts at the
permissive and restrictive temperatures in cells released from a G0
arrest (Figure 9A). Next, we tested
whether expression of GAL1-3XHA-CLN2 could permit
sda1-2 cells to reenter the cell cycle from a G0 arrest at
the restrictive temperature. G0-arrested sda1-2
GAL1-3XHA-CLN2 cells were released into fresh media containing either galactose or glucose at the restrictive temperature, and were
monitored for bud emergence every 2 h. We found that expression of
GAL1-3XHA-CLN2 induced polarization of the actin
cytoskeleton and bud emergence in 44% of both wild-type and
sda1-2 cells after 6 h (Figure 9B; our unpublished
data). After 24 h, the majority of the sda1-2
GAL1-3XHA-CLN2 cells possessed abnormal, elongated buds with
hyperpolarized actin. This phenotype was only observed when the
sda1-2 GAL1-3XHA-CLN2 strain was grown in
galactose-containing media. In addition, we obtained the same result if
we arrested rapidly growing sda1-2 GAL1-3XHA-CLN2 cells at
the restrictive temperature for 12 or 20 h and then added
galactose (our unpublished data). Staining of DNA and
microtubules revealed that the sda1-2 GAL1-3XHA-CLN2 cells
incubated in galactose-containing media for 24 h at the
restrictive temperature each contain a single nucleus localized to the
bud neck, but no mitotic spindle (our unpublished data).
Expression of GAL1-3XHA-CLN2 in wild-type cells caused a
mild elongated bud phenotype, but did not affect cell proliferation.
|
We also determined whether the sda1-2 GAL1-3XHA-CLN2 cells are able to undergo cell division at the restrictive temperature by observing individual cells plated on galactose-containing solid media at the restrictive temperature. We found that the sda1-2 GAL1-3XHA-CLN2 cells did not undergo cell division and 75% of the cells arrested with large, elongated buds and the other 25% remained as unbudded cells (our unpublished data). In addition, flow cytometry analysis demonstrated that expression of Cln2 does not induce DNA replication in the sda1-2 cells (Figure 9C). We also tested whether GAL1-3XHA-CLN3 could induce sda1-2 cells to reenter the cell cycle. We found that galactose-induced expression of CLN3 in the sda1-2 GAL1-CLN3 cells did not induce bud emergence or polarized actin structures (our unpublished data). Galactose-induced expression of CLN3 in the sda1-2 GAL1-CLN3 cells was confirmed by Northern blotting (our unpublished data). These experiments demonstrate that the sda1-2 mutant can be induced to undergo bud emergence from a G0 arrest by the expression of CLN2, but not CLN3.
Transcription of the G1 cyclins is controlled by the transcription
factor SBF, which is comprised of Swi4 and Swi6 (Nasmyth and Dirick,
1991
; Ogas et al., 1991
). Overexpression of Swi4 has been
shown to drive cells through G1 by inducing the expression of the G1
cyclins and other G1 transcripts (Breeden and Mikesell, 1994
; Dirick
et al., 1995
). Therefore, we tested whether the constitutive expression of SWI4 could rescue the sda1 mutant
phenotype and induce bud emergence. A plasmid containing
SWI4 controlled by the constitutive glycerol-3-phosphate
dehydrogenase (GPD) promoter was transformed into the sda1-2
strain. We found that expression of SWI4 did not induce bud
emergence or expression of Cln2 when G0-arrested sda1-2
cells were released into fresh media at the restrictive temperature
(our unpublished data). At the permissive temperature,
GPD-expression of SWI4 resulted in slightly longer buds and
an increase in Cln2 protein levels compared with cells containing
vector alone, confirming that the plasmid expressed Swi4.
sda1-2 Cells Arrested in G1 Respond to Mating Pheromone
Once cells pass through Start they are unable to respond to mating
pheromone until they complete cell division (Reid and Hartwell, 1977
).
We therefore used mating pheromone sensitivity as a means to determine
whether sda1-2 cells arrest before or after Start. We first
determined whether sda1-2 cells were able to respond to
factor at the restrictive temperature. To do this, we released G0-arrested sda1-2 cells into fresh media containing
factor at the restrictive temperature. After 6 h, polarization of
the actin cytoskeleton and formation of mating projections occurred in
80% of both wild-type and sda1-2 cells (Figure
10; our unpublished data). We
also found that polarization of the actin cytoskeleton and formation of
mating projections persisted even after 24 h at the restrictive
temperature in the presence of
factor (our unpublished
data).
|
To further confirm that the arrested sda1-2 cells
respond to
factor and to determine whether the cells arrest before
or after Start, we released G0-arrested cells into fresh media at the
restrictive temperature for 6 h, added
factor, and then immediately transferred the sda1-2 cells back to the
permissive temperature and monitored cell cycle progression. We found
that addition of
factor completely blocked cell cycle progression when the sda1-2 cells were transferred to the permissive
temperature, indicating the sda1-2 cells arrest before
Start. As a control, sda1-2 cells were transferred to the
permissive temperature without
factor. These underwent bud
emergence within 4 h and proliferated at a normal rate. All of the
factor-related experiments were repeated using rapidly dividing
sda1-2 cells arrested in G1 by incubation at the restrictive
temperature for 12 h, which yielded identical results. We were
unable to perform the reciprocal experiment (e.g., arrest with
factor and release at the restrictive temperature) because cells
arrested in G1 with
factor contain normal levels of functional
sda1-2 protein, which is not rapidly inactivated when cells
are shifted to the restrictive temperature (Figure 7). These results
demonstrate that sda1-2 cells arrested in G1 are able to
respond to
factor, suggesting that they have not passed through Start.
Sda1 Is Required for Increased Production of rRNA and Proteins in Cells Released from a G0 Arrest
sda1-2 cells fail to increase significantly in size
when released from a G0 arrest at the restrictive temperature.
Synthesis of rRNAs and proteins are key events that must occur during
G1 for cells to increase in size. We therefore assayed these two events
in sda1-2 cells released from a G0 arrest at the restrictive temperature. In wild-type control cells, we found that levels of rRNAs
began to increase 2 h after release from a G0 arrest, and 2 h
before the initiation of bud emergence (Figures
11A and 3B). In contrast, the
sda1-2 cells showed no increase in rRNA levels.
|
To assay protein synthesis, we gave cells a 15-min pulse of 35S-labeled methionine and cysteine at 1-h intervals after release from a G0 arrest. Newly translated proteins that incorporated 35S were viewed by autoradiography, and the amount of total protein synthesized was assayed by counting TCA-precipitable protein (Figure 11B). We also separated total proteins by SDS-PAGE and stained with Coomassie blue. We found that neither wild-type or sda1 cells carry out detectable protein synthesis during the first 15 min after release from a G0 arrest. At 1 h, wild-type and sda1-2 cells synthesize approximately equal amounts of protein. Note that there is no Sda1 protein detectable in wild-type cells at this time point, making it unlikely that general protein synthesis requires Sda1. The amount of protein synthesized by wild-type cells increases dramatically as the cells enter the cell cycle and divide. In the sda1-2 cells, however, there is only a slight increase in the amount of protein synthesized, consistent with a slight increase in cell size that we observe. These data suggest that there is a low basal level of protein synthesis and turnover that occurs in cells lacking Sda1 function, even though the cells do not grow significantly or divide. The failure to produce increased levels of proteins in the sda1-2 mutant cells is not due to an increased rate of protein turnover, because we found that protein turnover rates are similar in the sda1-2 cells compared with wild type cells (our unpublished data). These results demonstrate that Sda1 is not required for protein synthesis, but is required for the increased synthesis of proteins and rRNA that accompanies cell growth and entry into the cell cycle.
Deletion of the NAP1 Gene Causes Synthetic Lethality in cln1cln2 Cells
We first identified Sda1 as a protein that interacts with Nap1,
and previous work has demonstrated that Nap1 functions in a mitotic
signaling network that includes the kinases Gin4 and Cla4 (Altman and
Kellogg, 1997
; Tjandra et al., 1998
; Longtine et
al., 2000
). Interestingly, both Gin4 and Cla4 have been identified in screens for mutations that cause synthetic lethality in cells that
lack the function of the G1 cyclins Cln1 and Cln2, suggesting that they
carry out functions during G1 (Benton et al., 1993
, 1997
;
Cvrckova and Nasmyth, 1993
; Cvrckova et al., 1995
). The finding that Sda1 plays a key role in passage through G1 suggests that
Nap1 may also have a role in G1 events. We therefore tested whether
loss of Nap1 function results in lethality in
cln1
cln2 cells. To do this, we mated
nap1 cells to
cln1
cln2 cells, and then dissected tetrads and
searched for spores that carry all three deletions. We dissected over
35 tetrads and were unable to recover the triple deletion, indicating
that NAP1 is required for viability in
cln1
cln2 cells. We also tested for a genetic interaction between Nap1 and Sda1 by deleting or overexpressing Nap1 in
the sda1 mutant background; however, we found that neither of these conditions affected the temperature sensitivity of the sda1 mutants.
| |
DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
G1 phase is a critical point in the cell cycle where cells assess
conditions and decide whether to initiate a new round of cell division
(Pardee, 1989
; Murray and Hunt, 1993
; Cross, 1995
; Planas-Silva and
Weinberg, 1997
). In budding yeast, cells in G1 will not initiate a new
round of cell division until they have reached a critical size and are
in the presence sufficient nutrients. Similarly, vertebrate cells in G1
initiate cell division only when they have reached a critical size and
have received the appropriate external signals from growth factors.
Once these conditions are met, cells pass through a point late in G1
called Start (also referred to as the Restriction point). At the
molecular level, passage through Start reflects production of the G1
cyclins, which activate cyclin-dependent kinase activity and thereby
initiate the intricate series of events leading to cell division. The
molecular mechanisms that operate during G1 to integrate cell size,
external cues, and passage through Start are poorly understood. In this study, we demonstrate that the highly conserved Sda1 protein plays a
key role in the mechanisms necessary for passage through Start in
budding yeast.
Sda1 Is Required for Passage through G1
We have used several different approaches to demonstrate that Sda1 is required for passage through G1. First, we generated haploid spores that carry a complete deletion of the SDA1 gene and found that these fail to undergo budding or an increase in cell size. Second, we found that sda1 temperature-sensitive mutants released from a G0 arrest at the restrictive temperature completely fail to undergo budding, and rapidly growing sda1 temperature-sensitive mutants shifted to the restrictive temperature undergo a uniform G1 arrest. In each case, cells arrested by loss of Sda1 function do not increase significantly in size and contain a single nucleus with a 1N DNA content, an interphase microtubule array, and uniformly distributed cortical actin patches.
It is likely that the G1 arrest phenotype we have observed in temperature-sensitive sda1 mutants reflects a complete loss of Sda1 function, because Western blotting experiments demonstrate that the mutant sda1-2 protein fails to accumulate to significant levels at the restrictive temperature. In addition, all 10 sda1 mutant alleles result in an identical G1 arrest, and spores carrying a complete deletion of the SDA1 gene also produce a G1 arrest. Interestingly, rapidly growing sda1 mutants shifted to the restrictive temperature go through several divisions before arresting in G1. This appears to be due to the fact that preexisting sda1 mutant protein is stable and functional at the restrictive temperature, whereas newly made sda1 protein fails to accumulate, perhaps due to folding defects. Hence, the mutant phenotype is only observed when the preexisting Sda1 protein is depleted by several rounds of cell division. All 10 of our mutant alleles behave this way, suggesting that it is difficult to identify temperature-sensitive mutations that rapidly inactivate Sda1 function. This may explain why Sda1 was not identified in previous genetic screens for mutations that cause a rapid and specific cell cycle arrest. An alternative interpretation is that Sda1 is stringently required only upon emergence from a G0 arrest. To definitively demonstrate that Sda1 is required for passage through Start in every cell cycle, it will be necessary to identify conditional sda1 alleles that cause dividing cells to undergo a rapid G1 arrest.
Sda1 Is Required for Passage through Start
Previous work has demonstrated that production of the G1 cyclins
is a key event that drives cells through Start (Hadwiger et
al., 1989
; Richardson et al., 1989
). Budding yeast
express three different G1 cyclins, referred to as Cln1, Cln2, and Cln3 (Cross, 1995
). These cyclins are redundant, because expression of any
one of the three is sufficient to induce passage through Start,
although cells expressing only one G1 cyclin show a delay in exiting G1
and an increase in cell size (Hadwiger et al., 1989
; Dirick
et al., 1995
). The Cln3 cyclin is the most distantly related of the three cyclins, and appears to function to induce transcription of Cln1 and Cln2 (Tyers et al., 1993
; Dirick et
al., 1995
).
Loss of Sda1 function causes cells to arrest in G1 with 1N DNA, severely reduced levels of CLN2 mRNA, and undetectable levels of the Cln2 protein, suggesting that the cells arrest before Start. In addition, sda1 mutants arrest at a point where they are able to respond to mating pheromone. Taken together, these results argue strongly that sda1 mutants arrest before Start. Interestingly, sda1-2 cells exiting G0 at the restrictive temperature transcribe CLN3 mRNA normally, suggesting that the cells are able to initiate some of the events leading to passage through Start, but become blocked at a key step that requires Sda1.
Temperature-sensitive sda1 Mutants Are Not Rescued by Overexpression of G1 Cyclins
The finding that temperature-sensitive sda1 mutants
fail to produce the G1 cyclin Cln2 suggested the possibility that the primary defect in sda1 mutants may be a failure to
transcribe or translate G1 cyclins. To test this possibility, we
determined whether expression of CLN2 or CLN3
from a heterologous promoter could rescue the sda1-2 mutant
phenotype. Neither cyclin was able to rescue the proliferation defect;
however, expression of CLN2 initiated polarization of the
actin cytoskeleton and bud emergence. This finding suggests that loss
of Sda1 function does not affect general transcription or translation,
nor does it affect the ability of Cln2 to bind and activate Cdc28. In
addition, these results distinguish the sda1 loss of
function phenotype from the phenotype caused by loss of function of
cdc28 or the G1 cyclins. Cells arrested in G1 by loss of
function of cdc28 or the G1 cyclins arrest as unbudded cells
that continue to grow, resulting in the formation of abnormally large
cells (Reed, 1980
; Cross, 1990
). Loss of sda1 function, on
the other hand, does not lead to a significant increase in cell size,
supporting the idea that the primary defect in sda1 mutants
is not in the formation or activation of Cln/Cdc28 complexes.
Sda1 Does Not Appear to Be Required for the Assembly or Function of the Actin Cytoskeleton
It has previously been reported that rapidly growing cells
carrying a temperature-sensitive allele of SDA1 show a loss
of actin staining after 16 h at the restrictive temperature
(Buscemi et al., 2000
). It was also reported that release of
sda1 cells from an
factor arrest at the restrictive
temperature results in 80% of the cells losing actin staining after
4 h. Finally, it was reported that 20% of sda1 cells
arrest with large buds, separated nuclei, and interphase microtubule
arrays, suggesting defects in cytokinesis.
In contrast, we have found no evidence that Sda1 is required for the
assembly or function of the actin cytoskeleton. We found that
sda1-2 mutants released from a G0 arrest at the restrictive temperature have normal actin staining, even after 24 h at the restrictive temperature. We also found that addition of
factor to
cells arrested in G1 by loss of Sda1 function results in the formation
of shmoos with normal actin staining, and expression of Cln2 results in
polarization of the actin cytoskeleton and bud emergence. Because both
shmoo formation and bud emergence are absolutely dependent upon the
proper function of the actin cytoskeleton, these results argue strongly
against a requirement for Sda1 in the assembly or function of the actin
cytoskeleton. Finally, we found that shifting rapidly growing cells to
the restrictive temperature results in >95% of the cells arresting
without buds, inconsistent with a cytokinesis defect. It is important
to note that in these experiments the cells arrest with barely
detectable levels of the Sda1 protein, suggesting that the arrest
phenotype reflects a complete loss of function. We tested all 10 of our sda1 alleles and found that all arrest with a normal actin
cytoskeleton, arguing against the possibility that there are
allele-specific differences in the actin phenotype of sda1
mutants. Finally, we tested whether the previously reported
sda1-1 allele shows actin defects when shifted to the
restrictive temperature from log phase or from a G0 arrest, and
observed no defects, even after 15 h. At this point, we do not
understand the discrepancy between our results and those previously
reported for the sda1-1 allele.
Sda1 Binds to Nap1 In Vivo and In Vitro
We identified Sda1 as a protein that binds tightly to a Nap1
affinity column. In addition, we used coimmunoprecipitation and two-hybrid analysis to provide further evidence that Nap1 and Sda1
associate. Taken together, these experiments argue strongly that Sda1
and Nap1 interact in vivo. However, we do not yet know the functional
significance of this interaction. A combination of genetics and
biochemistry has shown that Nap1 plays an important role in a signaling
network that functions during mitosis (Altman and Kellogg, 1997
;
Tjandra et al., 1998
; Longtine et al., 2000![]()