|
|
|
|
Vol. 12, Issue 12, 4030-4043, December 2001
6
4 Integrin:
Implications for Basement Membrane Organization and Tumor
Invasion


§ and
*Department of Pathology, Division of Cancer Biology and
Angiogenesis, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston,
Massachusetts 02115; §Schepens Eye Research Institute,
Boston, Massachusetts 02115; and
Harvard Medical School,
Boston, Massachusetts 02115
| |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The integrin
6
4, a laminin receptor that stabilizes
epithelial cell adhesion to the basement membrane (BM) through its
association with cytokeratins, can stimulate the formation and
stabilization of actin-rich protrusions in carcinoma cells. An
important, unresolved issue, however, is whether this integrin
can transmit forces to the substrate generated by the acto-myosin
system. Using a traction-force detection assay, we detected forces
exerted through
6
4 on either laminin-1 or on an anti-
6
antibody, demonstrating that this integrin can transmit forces
without the need to engage other integrins. These
6
4-dependent traction forces were organized into a compression machine localized to the base of lamellae. We hypothesized that the
compression forces generated by
6
4 result in the remodeling of
BMs because this integrin plays a major role in the interaction of epithelial and carcinoma cells with such structures. Indeed, we
observed that carcinoma cells are able to remodel a reconstituted BM
through
6
4-mediated compression forces by a process that involves
the packing of BM material under the cells and the mechanical removal
of BM from adjacent areas. The distinct signaling functions of
6
4, which activate phosphoinositide 3-OH kinase and RhoA, also contribute to remodeling. Importantly, we demonstrate remodeling of a native BM by epithelial cells and the involvement of
6
4 in
this remodeling. Our findings have important implications for the
mechanism of both BM organization and tumor invasion.
| |
INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The
6
4 integrin, which is expressed primarily on the
basal surface of most epithelia and in most carcinoma cells, is a
structural and functional anomaly among the integrin family of
receptors. This integrin is defined as an adhesion receptor for
most of the known basement membrane laminins. The distinguishing
structural feature of
6
4 is the atypical cytoplasmic domain of
the
4 subunit. A primary function of
6
4, revealed by studies
on knockout and transgenic mice, is to maintain the integrity of
epithelia. This critical role for
6
4 derives from its ability to
mediate the formation of stable adhesive structures termed
hemidesmosomes on the basal cell surface that link the cytokeratin
network with laminins in the basement membrane (Green and Jones, 1996
;
Shaw et al., 1997
).
Although this involvement of
6
4 in hemidesmosome organization and
function has dominated the study of this integrin, recent studies have revealed novel and important functions for this
integrin in epithelial wound healing and in the migration and
invasion of carcinoma cells. Many studies have observed that expression of
6
4 is maintained or often increased in invasive and metastatic carcinomas and that
6
4 expression levels actually correlate with
the progression of these carcinomas (reviewed in Rabinovitz and
Mercurio, 1996
). Although such studies have provided evidence to
implicate
6
4 in the invasive process, they do not explain how an
integrin, which associates with intermediate filaments and
forms stable adhesive contacts, could promote the dynamic processes of
migration and invasion. Indeed, the presence of
6
4-containing hemidesmosomes would impede invasion. A significant breakthrough, therefore, was our finding that
6
4 actually mediates the
migration of carcinoma cells through its ability to associate with the
actin cytoskeleton and promote the formation and stabilization of
filopodia and lamellae (Rabinovitz and Mercurio, 1997
; O'Connor
et al., 1998
). This finding implied that the function and
cytoskeletal association of
6
4 in invasive carcinoma cells is
distinct from its established role of anchoring epithelial cells to the
basement membrane (BM) through its association with cytokeratins. A
second significant finding that provided a mechanistic basis for the involvement of
6
4 in invasion was that this integrin
stimulates the activity of the enzyme phosphoinositide 3-OH kinase
(PI3-K) in invasive carcinoma cells and that PI3-K is essential for
migration and invasion (Shaw et al., 1997
).
Our current interest is to understand the mechanisms by which the
6
4 integrin contributes to the migration process and to relate such mechanisms to invasion. The migration of many cells in
culture involves actin polymerization that generates protrusions at the
edge of the cell and the contraction of the actin network by associated
myosin motors (Lauffenburger and Horwitz, 1996
; Mitchison and Cramer,
1996
). It has become apparent from studies on fish keratocytes and
fibroblasts that adhesion to the substrate in the lamellar area
provides the necessary traction to support the propulsive forces
generated by the cytoskeleton to haul the rest of the cell (Lee
et al., 1994
; Burton et al., 1999
). Given this
knowledge, one possible mechanism by which
6
4 stimulates migration is to enhance the generation of traction by lamellae. We have
shown that
6
4 is localized to the base of lamellae in carcinoma
cells migrating on laminin (Rabinovitz and Mercurio, 1997
). Moreover,
the formation of actin bundles parallel to the lamella in such cells,
which is considered to be crucial for the generation of traction in the
keratocyte and fibroblast models, is dependent on
6
4 (Rabinovitz
and Mercurio, 1997
). The ability of
6
4 to generate traction
forces created by the actomyosin cytoskeleton has not been determined,
in part, because most studies on this integrin have focused on
its association with the cytokeratin cytoskeleton. Moreover, the
consequences of
6
4-mediated traction forces on BM organization
and invasion have not been considered.
In this study, we used a well characterized traction-force detection
assay (Dembo and Wang, 1999
; Pelham and Wang, 1999
) to establish that
such forces are exerted through the
6
4 integrin. These
6
4-dependent traction forces are organized into a compression machine localized to the base of lamellae. Moreover, we observed that
carcinoma cells are able to remodel a reconstituted BM through
6
4-mediated compression forces by a process that involves the packing of BM material under the cells and the mechanical removal of BM
from adjacent areas. Importantly, we also demonstrate that the
signaling properties of
6
4 can stimulate BM remodeling. Finally,
we provide evidence for the remodeling of a natural BM by epithelial
cells and for the involvement of
6
4 in this process. Our findings
have important implications for the mechanism of both BM organization
and tumor invasion.
| |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Cells and Antibodies
The clone A cell line was isolated from a human, poorly
differentiated colon adenocarcinoma (Lotz et al., 1990
). The
clone A integrin receptors have been described previously (Lotz
et al., 1990
). Stable subclones of MDA-MB-435 human breast
carcinoma cells were used that had been transfected with either the
expression vector alone (mock transfectants) or a full-length
4 cDNA
(MDA/
4 transfectants). The characterization of these transfectants
has been described previously (Shaw et al., 1997
).
The following three monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) were used in
this study: GoH3, a rat mAb specific for the integrin
6
subunit (Immunotech, Westbrook, ME); MC-13, a mouse mAb specific
for the integrin
1 subunit (provided by Dr. Steven Akiyama);
and anti-LDL receptor mAb (Oncogene Science, Cambridge, MA).
Reagents
Laminin-1, prepared from the EHS sarcoma, was provided by Dr.
Hynda Kleinman (National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD). Fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)-labeled laminin was provided by Dr.
Peter D. Yurchenco (Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Piscataway,
NJ). Matrigel was purchased from BD Biosciences (San Jose, CA).
Cytochalasin B, nocodazole, butanedione monoxime (BDM), and
phorbol-12-myristate-13-acetate (PMA) were obtained from Sigma (St.
Louis, MO). The Rho kinase inhibitor Y27632 was purchased from U.S.
Biochemical (Cleveland, OH) and the PI3-K inhibitor LY294002 was
purchased from Calbiochem (San Diego, CA). Fluorescent beads (2-µm
fluospheres) were obtained from Molecular Probes (Eugene, OR), and gold
colloid particles (5 nm) were obtained from Ted Pella (Redding, CA).
|
Traction-Detection System
A flexible, polyacrylamide gel containing fluorescent beads and
coated with either laminin (100 µg/ml) or goat anti-rat/mouse antibodies (100 µg/ml) was prepared following a published protocol (Dembo and Wang, 1999
; Pelham and Wang, 1999
). Cells were plated on the
laminin substrate and incubated for 1 h at 37°C in a
CO2 incubator. Before plating the cells on the
antibody substrates, the cells were incubated for 20 min in the
presence of either the rat GoH3 antibody or anti-LDL receptor antibody,
and the unbound antibody was removed by two cycles of centrifugation
and resuspension in medium. The dishes were sealed with Parafilm
(American National Can, Menasha, WI). Random cells were filmed
digitally using time lapse video-microscopy on a Nikon Diaphot 300 inverted microscope equipped with a heated stage, by using both phase
contrast and fluorescence optics. This microscope was connected to a
charge-coupled device camera (Dage-MTI, Michigan City, IN), a
frame-grabber (Scion, Frederick, MD), and a G3 Power Macintosh computer
to capture the images. Images were collected and analyzed with IPlab
Spectrum image analysis software (Scanalytics, Fairfax, VA). Both phase contrast and fluorescence images were registered for each point in
time. The phase contrast and fluorescent images were merged and frame
sequences were animated using the image analysis software.
Bead displacement was quantified as described (Wang and Pelham, 1998
;
Pelham and Wang, 1999
). Briefly, cells and fluorescent beads were
photographed after a 1-h incubation, and the cells were then treated
for 15 min with either trypsin/EDTA (for cells on laminin substrate) or
for 1 h with proteinase K (1 mg/ml phosphate-buffered saline; for
cells on antibody substrate) to relax the elastic substrate. A second
photograph was taken at this time point and compared with the first
photograph. In this way, vector maps indicating the magnitude and
direction of bead displacement were built and analyzed using image
analysis software. For the comparative purposes of our study, we
estimated traction forces only in terms of relative bead displacement,
because displacement is related proportionally to the traction force
according to Hooke's law. It was apparent that groups of beads in
defined regions were being displaced coherently in a similar direction.
To facilitate quantification of the total area displaced by each cell
as an estimate of traction, regions of coherent bead displacement were
delineated. The displacement of individual beads inside each of these
regions was calculated and the values obtained were averaged. The
average displacement of beads was then multiplied by the area of the
region containing the beads to obtain the total region displacement.
The total area displaced per cell was obtained by the sum of all region
displacement. A total of 10 cells was analyzed for each assay.
Remodeling of Reconstituted BM
Matrigel was mixed with fluorescent beads and reconstituted on coverslips that had been glued to "punched" plastic Petri dishes. Clone A or MDA-MB-435 cells were plated on the top of the gel and incubated for 1-8 h inside a CO2 incubator, the time depending on the nature of experiment. In some experiments, the dishes were sealed with parafilm, and analyzed using time-lapse videomicroscopy as described above. For each point in time, both cells and fluorescent beads were photographed using phase contrast or fluorescence microscopy, respectively. Function-blocking antibodies, PMA, or cytoskeleton-related inhibitors were added at the concentrations and times described in the corresponding figures. In some experiments, the cells were assayed on Matrigel prepared without fluorescent beads, and then the preparations were fixed with methanol and stained with Coomassie Blue. In other experiments, FITC-labeled laminin (instead of fluorescent beads) was mixed with Matrigel and reconstituted as described above before plating the cells. A semiquantitative analysis of Matrigel compression was done by determining the distance between specific pairs of beads filmed before, during, and after they were traversed by lamellae. Ten pairs of beads were tracked for each assay. In some experiments, a digital analysis of the fluorescence intensity produced by the clustered beads around the cells was done to assess Matrigel compression. As the beads concentrate in small areas, they also increase the net fluorescence of the area. The background produced by nonclustered beads was removed by thresholding the images above a certain intensity value.
Analysis of Corneal BMs
Rabbit corneas were used to obtain stroma with preserved BMs as
well as sheets of corneal epithelium. The method to remove epithelia
from their underlying stroma and to obtain viable epithelial sheets has
been described previously (Gipson and Grill, 1982
; Gipson et
al., 1983
). The separated stroma containing the BM was transferred
to a gold colloid suspension (5-nm particles; adjusted to pH 9) and
incubated at room temperature for 30 min. The gold particles bound to
the stroma were stabilized by removing the gold colloid suspension and
incubating the samples in Hanks' balanced salt solution containing 1%
bovine serum albumin for 10 min. The tissue was rinsed extensively
using the bovine serum albumin/Hanks' balanced salt solution buffer.
This corneal substrate was cut in quarters. The epithelial sheets
obtained from other corneas were cut smaller than the portion of gold
labeled stroma to which it was to be applied to provide a leading edge
because it has been shown previously that epithelia in these
circumstances can migrate along the substrate and retard the formation
of hemidesmosomes (Gipson et al., 1983
). Before recombining
with the substrate, the epithelial sheet was incubated or not with GoH3
or anti-rabbit major histocompatibility complex (MHC)-I antibody
(10 µg/ml) for 20 min. The GoH3 antibody has been previously shown to
recognize the
6 integrin of rabbit corneas (Stepp et
al., 1990
). MHC-I is also present in cornea (Gipson, unpublished
data). The epithelial sheet was recombined with the substrate and
incubated for 3-6 h in minimal essential medium (supplemented as
described previously; Gipson et al., 1983
). The tissues were
fixed and processed for electron microscopy analysis by using standard
techniques (Gipson et al., 1983
). Five to 10 fields were
photographed for each block sectioned at two different depths.
The photographic negatives were scanned into G3 PowerMac. The distribution of gold particles was performed by counting and sizing clusters of gold particles by using IPLab spectrum image analysis software.
Online Supplemental Material
All videos are merged composites of phase contrast (red: cells) and fluorescent images (green: beads). Frame intervals: 2 min. Figure 1b.mov: Formation of a lamella (arrow) produces bead displacement on a laminin-coated elastic substrate. Figure 1c.mov: Filopodium (arrow) produces the displacement of a few beads. Figure 6.mov: Filopodia (arrows) efficiently pull Matrigel/beads toward the cell body. Figure 7.mov: clone A cell stimulated with PMA compresses Matrigel/beads (gray scale).
| |
RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
6
4 Integrin Can Mediate Traction Forces onto a
Laminin Substrate
A well-characterized force-detection system was used to assess the
ability of the
6
4 integrin to mediate traction forces (Wang and Pelham, 1998
; Pelham and Wang, 1999
). The system consisted of
an elastic polyacrylamide sheet that was embedded with fluorescent beads and coated with laminin-1 on its surface. Elastic deformation of
the gel by the cell produces displacement of the beads, proportional to
the forces generated by the acto-myosin system and transmitted to the
substrate via adhesive interactions (Wang and Pelham, 1998
; Pelham and
Wang, 1999
). For these initial studies, we used either clone A colon or
A431 squamous carcinoma cells because we and others have established
that these cells couple
6 exclusively with
4, and that
6
4 mediates the migration of these cells on laminin (Falcioni
et al., 1988
; Lotz et al., 1990
; Lee et
al., 1992
; Rabinovitz and Mercurio, 1997
; Rabinovitz et
al., 1999
). The cells plated on these elastic substrates formed
small lamellae and filopodia (Figure 1A, arrows).
Traction forces were analyzed indirectly by measuring the deformation
of the elastic substrate produced by the cells. Bead positions were
registered before and after relaxing the substrate by using trypsin,
which abolishes cell traction by eliminating adhesion (Pelham and Wang,
1999
). The arrows in Figure 1D represent the direction and distance a
bead is displaced before and after treatment with trypsin.
Subsequently, we assessed the importance of
6
4 in the
transmission of traction forces by quantifying the average bead
displacement in the presence or absence of an
6 function-blocking
antibody (Figure 1E). This antibody eliminated most of the traction on
the substrate generated by the cells. These data provide evidence that
6
4 can transmit traction forces onto a laminin substrate.
In previous work studying the behavior of clone A cells and other
carcinoma cells on laminin (Rabinovitz and Mercurio, 1997
; Rabinovitz
et al., 1999
), we demonstrated that
6
4 is present in
lamellae and that their formation depends on this integrin. We
had also observed that
6
4 is present at sites of filopodia anchorage (Rabinovitz and Mercurio, 1997
). Consistent with a role of
6
4 in the transmission of traction forces at these sites, the
analysis of bead displacement by time-lapse videomicroscopy revealed
that small lamellae produced the strongest deformation (Figure 1, A and
B, and Figure 1a.mov). Vector maps of bead displacement, which were
built by connecting the initial and final positions of each bead at the
beginning and end of the frame sequence (Figure 1B, middle), revealed
that these small lamellae frequently compressed the substrate. These
vectors focused their compressive action to the base of the lamellae
(Figure 1b.mov, and Figure 1, B and D), an area where
6
4
expression is concentrated (Rabinovitz and Mercurio, 1997
). Filopodia
exerted discrete, small forces on the substrate, as indicated by
limited displacement of one or a few beads in areas where filopodia
attachment was apparent (Figure 1C and Figure 1c.mov). This was
observed frequently in cells that presented filopodia. Other cell
areas, such as the nuclear area, showed little traction activity. These
data suggest that
6
4 mediates transmission of traction forces at
cell protrusions and that these forces comprise a substrate-compression machine.
The
6
4 integrin can stimulate intracellular signaling
(Shaw et al., 1997
; O'Connor et al., 2000
). The
possibility existed, therefore, that the inhibition of traction forces
by
6
4 function blocking antibodies resulted from the inhibition
of
6
4-dependent signaling events that impact the mechanical
transmission of traction by laminin receptors other than
6
4. To
establish more definitively that
6
4 can transmit traction forces
onto the substrate directly, we modified the traction-detection system
substrate so that it would engage cells exclusively through the
6
4 integrin. For this purpose, we cross-linked the
polyacrylamide gel with an anti-rat antibody to link
6
4 from A431
cells that had been coated with the rat GoH3 antibody and analyzed the
traction generated. Any traction observed in this system must be
transmitted through
6
4. As a specificity control, we coated the
cells with a mouse anti-LDL receptor mAb and cross-linked the
polyacrylamide with an anti-mouse antibody. The GoH3-coated cells
partially spread on the polyacrylamide gel and produced a substantial
number of filopodia and lamellar protrusions. Importantly, a
significant amount of bead displacement was observed under these
conditions (Figure 2). In contrast, the anti-LDL mAb-coated cells did not spread and they produced no protrusions or bead displacement. These data establish that
6
4 can mechanically transmit traction forces onto a laminin substrate.
|
Traction Forces Mediated by
6
4 Integrin Remodel
Reconstituted BM
Our finding that the
6
4 integrin can mediate
traction forces on laminin and deform this matrix raised the
possibility that cells that express this integrin could also
deform or remodel BMs. To examine this possibility, fluorescent beads
(0.2 um) were embedded in reconstituted BM (Matrigel) and allowed to
solidify into a thick gel (40 µm thick). Clone A cells were plated on
the Matrigel and the system was videotaped using both phase contrast and fluorescence microscopy. This video analysis revealed that clone A
cells rapidly pull in the adjacent Matrigel, as indicated by the inward
(centripetal) movement and increasing concentration of beads around the
cells (Figure 3, A and B, and videos;
Figure 6.mov; and Figure 7.mov).
|
To demonstrate that the observed concentration of beads around the
cells reflected a concentration of Matrigel protein, cells were stained
with Coomassie Blue to detect protein concentration. The intense
Coomassie Blue staining around the cells and diminished staining in
adjacent areas (Figure 4A) indicate that
clone A cells induce condensation of Matrigel protein around them by
sequestering Matrigel from adjacent areas that are devoid of cells. A
similar pattern was observed by indirect immunofluorescence by using an anti-laminin antibody (our unpublished data). The possibility that
these observations reflect the de novo secretion of laminin by clone A
cells was excluded by incorporating FITC-laminin in the Matrigel. As
shown in Figure 4D, the FITC-laminin was concentrated around the cell
in a manner consistent with Coomassie and laminin stains, as well as
the observed bead movement. Together, these data demonstrate that clone
A cells can remodel reconstituted BM by concentrating BM proteins
around them.
|
Next, we assessed the contribution of the
6
4 integrin to
BM remodeling by using initially a function-blocking antibody. Treatment of clone A cells with this antibody significantly reduced the
centripetal movement of beads toward cells (Figure 3C) and the
condensation of Matrigel proteins around cells (Figure 4B). Importantly, antibody inhibition of
6
4 did not detach cells from
Matrigel; it only prevented their ability to remodel this matrix. The
use of a function-blocking
1 integrin antibody, in contrast,
did perturb clone A attachment to Matrigel (our unpublished data).
Thus, it is likely that remodeling involves the concerted action of
both
6
4 and
1 integrins and that these
integrins mediate distinct functions, a scenario that we
postulated for clone A migration on laminin (Rabinovitz and Mercurio,
1997
).
Stimulation of Breast Carcinoma Invasion by
6
4 Expression Is
Coincident with Increased BM Remodeling
Additional evidence to establish a distinct role for
6
4 in
BM remodeling was obtained using a different cell system. MDA-MB-435 breast carcinoma cells do not express this integrin (Shaw
et al., 1997
). Stable transfectants of these cells that
express
6
4 exhibit a marked increase in their ability to invade
Matrigel (Shaw et al., 1997
). As shown in Figure
5, the MDA-MB-435/
6
4 transfectants were able to remodel Matrigel to a much greater extent than the mock
transfectants as evidenced by bead compression around the cells.
|
Remodeling of Reconstituted BM Results from Compressive Forces Exerted by Lamellae and Filopodia
The dynamics of Matrigel remodeling by clone A cells and the cell
structures involved in this process were studied using time-lapse videomicroscopy. At early times after plating on Matrigel, cells extended small lamellae and filopodia in all directions and formed a
ring of Matrigel condensation around them (Figure 4D), suggesting that
compression forces occur mostly at the cell edges and exclude the
central area of the cell. Using the Matrigel/fluorescent bead method
described above to monitor movement of BM material, we observed that
the beads moved toward cells in areas where lamellae were protruded. At
distal sites, much of the bead pulling was done by filopodia (Figure
6 and Figure 6.mov).
|
To examine the involvement of lamellae in remodeling in more detail, we
stimulated clone A cells on Matrigel with PMA, which results in the
formation of large, fan-shaped lamellae. PMA stimulation increased the
remodeling of Matrigel significantly as evidenced by an increase in
bead concentration under the cells compared with unstimulated cells
(Figure 7 and Figure 7.mov). By analyzing bead compression, which is defined as the distance between specific beads before, during, and after the cell passes over them, we noted
that Matrigel is compressed to 50% of its original dimension and
recovers to only 65% of its original size (our unpublished data).
Importantly, compression occurs specifically under lamellae and
terminates behind the flat portion of lamellae (Figure
8 and Figure 8.mov). No bead movement was
observed at the rear of the cell or at the rear of the "wings" of
the lamellae, suggesting that most of the force is compressive only at
the sites where Matrigel is in contact with lamellae. This phenomenon
was particularly evident at the wings of lamellae, where there is a
small distance between the lamella and the rear of the cell (Figure
7.mov). Soon after the wing of a lamella passed over an area of
Matrigel, a modest, but significant relaxation of the Matrigel was seen
(Figure 8). Thus, it is clear from these images that most of the
compression is achieved, not between the front and rear of the cell,
but in the area beneath the lamellae, before the bulk of cytoplasm
begins.
|
|
Our results indicate that BM remodeling is clearly a phenomenon driven by traction. The massive movements of Matrigel associated with cell protrusions that occur in such short times support this conclusion. Furthermore, remodeling requires the acto-myosin system because it is inhibited by either cytochalasin B or BDM (our unpublished data).
Signaling Pathways Stimulated by
6
4 Are Involved in BM
Remodeling
Based on the findings that
6
4 stimulates the activity of
signaling molecules involved in regulating actin dynamics in carcinoma cells (Shaw et al., 1997
; O'Connor et al.,
2000
), it was important to assess whether these signaling pathways are
involved in BM remodeling. Specifically,
6
4 has been shown to
stimulate the activity of both PI3-K and RhoA. We assessed the
participation of these molecules in the remodeling activity of clone A
cells by using pharmacological inhibitors. As shown in Figure
9 both LY294002 (PI3-K) and Y27632 (Rho
kinase) impeded the remodeling process. These data indicate an
important role for PI3-K and RhoA in BM remodeling, and they suggest an
important role for
6
4-mediated signaling in addition to its
ability to mediate traction forces in the remodeling process.
|
Evidence for Remodeling of Native BMs by
6
4 Integrin
Given our findings that the
6
4 integrin can mediate
traction forces and remodel reconstituted BMs, it was important to
establish whether these events occurred with native BMs. For
this purpose, we used the BM of the rabbit cornea. The corneal
epithelium can be removed to yield a "denuded" BM (Gipson et
al., 1983
). An intact epithelial-stromal structure can be
reconstituted by the addition of a freshly isolated epithelium to the
denuded BM. The size of the epithelium that is added back is smaller
than the area of the BM, a situation that promotes cell migration in
the direction of the free edge. In our experiments, we coated the
denuded BM with gold colloid particles (5 nm) that bound to the BM in a
homogeneous pattern (Figure 10A).
Subsequently, these denuded BMs were recombined with corneal epithelia.
Our assumption was that a mechanical displacement or remodeling of the
BM by the epithelium would alter the distribution pattern of the gold
particles. For example, a local compression of BM material by the
epithelial cells would result in the formation of a more densely packed
group of gold particles. Indeed, using this approach, we observed that
the epithelium did induce a redistribution of gold particles into more
densely packed clusters (Figure 10B). Quantitative analysis of this
particle redistribution revealed a significant increase in clustering
at 3 h and an additional increase at 6 h (Figure 10C). At
these time points, mature hemidesmosomes were not apparent, an
observation that is consistent with previous evidence showing that
migratory epithelia do not form hemidesmosomes (Gipson et
al., 1993
).
|
Next, we assessed whether the
6
4 integrin contributes to
the remodeling of the corneal BM. The corneal epithelium expresses
6
4 but not
6
1 (Stepp et al., 1993
). An
6
4
function-blocking antibody was incubated with isolated epithelium
before and after recombining this epithelium with denuded BM.
Importantly, this antibody treatment did not perturb the attachment of
the epithelium to the BM, an observation consistent with recent
findings that BM attachment is mediated by
1 integrins
(Raghavan et al., 2000
). We did observe, however, that this
antibody treatment reduced the formation of gold particle aggregates
significantly (Figure 10D). As a specificity control, we used an
antibody specific for the rabbit MHC-I protein, which showed no
inhibitory activity (Figure 10D). These data provide evidence that the
6
4 integrin participates in the remodeling of a natural
BM.
| |
DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The integrin
6
4, a laminin receptor that stabilizes
epithelial cell adhesion to the BM through its association with
cytokeratins, can stimulate the formation and stabilization of
actin-rich protrusions in carcinoma cells (Rabinovitz and Mercurio,
1997
; Rabinovitz et al., 1999
). An important, unresolved
issue, however, was whether this integrin could transmit forces
to the substrate generated by the acto-myosin system. Although
6
4
can associate with the actin cytoskeleton (Rabinovitz and Mercurio,
1997
), this association does not imply necessarily that it can transmit
forces to a substrate directly. Moreover, the distinct signaling
functions of
6
4 could have a significant impact on actin dynamics
and acto-myosin contraction. Using a well-characterized traction-force
detection assay, we were able to detect forces exerted through the
6
4 integrin on either laminin-1, a matrix ligand, or on
an anti-
6
4 antibody, demonstrating that this integrin can
transmit forces without the need to engage other integrins.
These
6
4-dependent traction forces were organized into a
compression machine localized to the base of lamellae. We hypothesized
that the compression forces generated by
6
4 result in the
remodeling of BMs because this integrin plays a major role in
the interaction of epithelial and carcinoma cells with such structures.
Indeed, we observed that carcinoma cells are able to remodel a
reconstituted BM through
6
4-mediated compression forces by a
process that involves the packing of BM material under the cells and
the mechanical removal of BM from adjacent areas. Importantly, we also
provide evidence for the remodeling of a native BM by epithelial cells
and for the involvement of
6
4 in this remodeling. In addition, we
demonstrate that the distinct signaling functions of
6
4 also
stimulate remodeling. Our findings have important implications for the
mechanism of both BM organization and tumor invasion.
Traction forces play an important role in cell migration and in
remodeling of the extracellular membrane (ECM) (Stopak and Harris,
1982
; Lee et al., 1994
). These forces are generated by myosin motors, which act on the actin cytoskeleton, to transmit tension
to the ECM through cell adhesion receptors (Mitchison and Cramer,
1996
). Studies in this area, however, have focused primarily on the
ability of
1 integrins, which associate only with F-actin,
to mediate traction forces (Lee and Jacobson, 1997
). The
6
4
integrin, in contrast, is a unique receptor that was defined
originally as the only integrin that associates with
cytokeratins and not with F-actin (Green and Jones, 1996
). To date, no
studies have demonstrated that cytokeratins generate traction forces. Importantly, therefore, our observation that
6
4 is able to
mediate traction forces strengthens our hypothesis that this
integrin can interact with F-actin, as well as cytokeratins,
and that its association with F-actin can be a significant factor in
cell movement. The ability of
6
4 to mediate traction forces
generated by the acto-myosin cytoskeleton provides an important
functional consequence of its interaction with F-actin because such
forces may play a critical role in cell migration and BM remodeling.
The organization of the
6
4-dependent traction forces in carcinoma
cells is consistent with the description of these forces in other
extensively studied models, such as fish keratocytes and fibroblasts
(Lee et al., 1994
; Dembo et al., 1996
; Svitkina et al., 1997
; Burton et al., 1999
; Oliver
et al., 1999
; Pelham and Wang, 1999
). Fish keratocytes have
a distinct compressive component that is parallel to the lamella and
probably functions to release rear attachments allowing the cell to
move forward efficiently (Lee et al., 1994
; Oliver et
al., 1995
). The "dynamic contraction network" model has been
proposed to explain this compression pattern (Svitkina et
al., 1997
; Burton et al., 1999
). In this model,
compression forces increase gradually from the edge of the cell and
achieve a maximum at the base of the lamella. Force vectors from the
cell's edge are directed to the base of the lamella, whereas beyond
this point the vectors can reverse direction. Interestingly, the
dynamic contraction network may account for the
6
4-dependent traction forces that we observed. Specifically, the vector maps of bead
displacement we generated suggest a concentration of forces from the
edge of the cell toward the base of the lamella that reverses direction
after this point. In addition, we noted that cells "pull" Matrigel
inward toward the base of the lamella where compression is maximal and
that the compressed Matrigel relaxes after this point. Additional
evidence in support of this model is provided by our previous finding
that a gradient of actin filament bundles is present parallel to the
lamella in colon carcinoma cells that concentrate at the base of this
structure (Rabinovitz and Mercurio, 1997
). The enhanced localization of
6
4 at the base of lamellae (Rabinovitz and Mercurio, 1997
;
Rabinovitz et al., 1999
) is compatible with the idea that
6
4 is localized at sites of traction to provide the necessary
attachment. Interestingly, however,
6
4 is also localized in
retraction fibers at the rear of migrating cells (Rabinovitz and
Mercurio, 1997
) but we observed that little traction is generated by
these structures. These observation suggest that the ability of
6
4 to generate traction is a function of its localization within
the cell.
A likely possibility is that the
6
4-dependent traction forces
account for the ability of this integrin to mediate both
compression and migration on laminin matrices. Forces that lead to
compression may pull the cell body forward if some release of rear
attachments occurs. Indeed, our observation that the lamella of
PMA-stimulated clone A cells produces both compression and forward
movement is consistent with the idea that both compression and movement
can occur at the same time (Figure 7.mov). The mechanism of rear
detachment in clone A cells involves little frictional force, as
indicated by the absence of bead movement behind the lamella. This rear detachment may result from lateral forces such as those observed in
fish keratocytes, which generate minimal frictional force (Oliver et al., 1998
, 1999
). These forces probably result from the
high concentration and orientation of stress fibers at the base of the
lamella. As mentioned above, clone A cells exhibit a concentration of
stress fibers parallel to the base of the lamella (Rabinovitz and
Mercurio, 1997
). Importantly, we observed significant bead movement
parallel and toward to the wings of lamellae in PMA-stimulated cells (Figure 7.mov), and relaxation of the gel behind the base of the
lamella, in agreement with the mechanism of keratocyte movement.
A key finding in this study is that the compressive component of
6
4-mediated traction forces results in the remodeling of BMs. In
fact, few studies have focused on the possibility that cells alter BM
organization and that this reorganization is an integrin-mediated process. The salient example is the
remodeling of Matrigel by endothelial cells to form tubule structures,
a process that is dependent on
1 integrins (Vernon et
al., 1992
; Davis and Camarillo, 1995
). Our findings are
significant not only because they extend this concept of remodeling but
also because they link the biophysical properties of an
integrin that plays a preeminent role in the interaction of
both epithelial and carcinoma cells with BMs in this remodeling
function. Moreover, an important and novel aspect of our study is the
finding that epithelial cells can remodel native BMs mechanically and
that the
6
4 integrin contributes to this remodeling.
Specifically, we demonstrated, using the well-established cornea
reconstitution model (Gipson and Grill, 1982
; Gipson
et al., 1983
), that the corneal epithelium is able to
remodel corneal BMs that had been coated with gold particles as
evidenced by the redistribution of these particles. Supporting the
mechanical nature of this redistribution, a function-blocking antibody
specific for
6
4 was able to inhibit the redistribution of gold
particles significantly. We conclude from these results that BM
remodeling by epithelial and carcinoma cells is not limited to
reconstituted basement membranes.
The distinct signaling properties of
6
4 also contribute to BM
remodeling by this integrin. At least two key signaling
molecules, PI3-K and RhoA, are activated by
6
4 in carcinoma cells
(Shaw et al., 1997
; O'Connor et al., 2000
).
Importantly, the
6
4-mediated activation of these signaling
molecules has been shown to be essential for the ability of this
integrin to promote carcinoma migration and invasion (Shaw
et al., 1997
; O'Connor et al., 1998
). Given our
findings in the present study, a link between
6
4-mediated compression and
6
4-mediated signaling becomes apparent.
Specifically, the contractile forces that are converted to traction by
6
4 under lamellae could arise from
6
4-mediated activation
of Rho and the consequent Rho stimulation of actin myosin contraction. This
6
4-mediated signaling of contraction may also be an
important component of invasion that occurs by
6
4-dependent BM
remodeling as we postulated above. In support of this possibility, we
observed that inhibition of Rho kinase activity disrupts the
6
4-mediated compression of Matrigel. Along the same lines,
6
4-stimulation of PI3-K and consequent changes in actin dynamics
may contribute to the formation of filopodial and lamellar protrusions,
processes that are also facilitated by the engagement of
6
4 with
laminins in the matrix. Together, the studies on
6
4 exemplify the
fruitfulness of integrating signaling studies with studies on
integrin-mediated traction forces and ECM remodeling.
Our findings on BM remodeling by the
6
4 integrin may have
important implications for BM organization, especially in light of
recent studies on integrin knockout mice. It is apparent from analysis of the
4 knockout mice that the
6
4 integrin
is not necessary for the formation of the BM itself (Dowling et
al., 1996
; Dipersio et al., 1997
). Interestingly,
however, we noticed in the published electron micrographs of the
epidermis from these mice that the BM is atypically smooth and
homogeneous (Dowling et al., 1996
). In contrast, similar
electron microscopy images obtained from wild-type mice, as well as
other BMs, indicate an increased concentration of BM material adjacent
to the hemidesmosomes and a relatively "thin" BM in areas between
BMs (Gipson et al., 1983
; Rousselle et al.,
1991
). The hypothesis can be derived from these images, in concert with
our data, that the
6
4 integrin "sweeps" or compresses
BM as part of the process of hemidesmosome formation. Such localized
compression of BM would be consistent with our observation that
homogeneously distributed gold particles attached to the cornea BM are
gathered into discrete clusters by the epithelium, suggesting that
compression occurs toward discrete, small areas. Although
6
4 may
play a distinct role in BM remodeling, other integrins probably
contribute to this process. Evidence to support a role for
1
integrins, for example, in BM organization comes from the
analysis of
1 integrin knockout mice. The BMs of these mice
are disorganized compared with wild-type mice (Raghavan et
al., 2000
). Interestingly, although the BMs of the
3
integrin knockout mice appear to be discontinuous, stretches of
BMs corresponding to areas of hemidesmosome localization are preserved
(Dipersio et al., 1997
). One explanation for these
observations based on our results is that the
6
4 integrin
compresses BM toward the hemidesmosome and the
3
1
integrin functions to maintain a continuous structure, perhaps
by contributing to BM formation. This notion is consistent with the
report that the
7
1 integrin, a laminin receptor on muscle
cells, can nucleate laminin polymerization (Colognato et
al., 1999
).
A major implication of BM remodeling is tumor invasion. Although
remodeling as a mechanism of BM breaching during tumor invasion has not
been considered previously, our findings support such a mechanism.
Specifically, compression of BM in certain areas would generate gaps in
adjacent areas through which tumor cells could escape. Interestingly,
expression of the
6
4 integrin in MDA-MB-435 breast
carcinoma cells increases their ability to invade Matrigel in a
standard Boyden chamber assay dramatically (Shaw et al.,
1997
). In addition, we observed in the present study that
6
4
expression in these cells enhanced their ability to remodel Matrigel
substantially. A likely possibility is that the stimulation of invasion
that is coincident with
6
4 expression derives from an increase in
Matrigel remodeling. It is also worth noting that the
6
4-mediated
remodeling of Matrigel is not blocked by protease inhibitors (our
unpublished data). Although these findings do not discount a role for
proteases in tumor invasion, they do suggest that force-dependent
remodeling should be considered as a mechanism of invasion. In fact,
ECM remodeling as a component of tumor progression has been suggested
previously. For example, a correlation between ECM remodeling and
melanoma invasion has been observed (Klein et al., 1991
).
Similar studies observed that highly invasive melanoma cells can
remodel three-dimensional matrices, although partial matrix degradation
was also observed (Friedl et al., 1997
). Most likely, both
remodeling activity and protease activity are needed to maximize
invasion (Silletti et al., 1998
)
| |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
We thank Steve Akiyama, Hynda Kleinman, and Peter Yurchenco for reagents. We also thank Dongmei Cheng, Ann Tisdale, Pat Pearson, and Sandra Spurr-Michaud for technical assistance. This work was supported by National Institutes of Health grants CA-88919 (to I.R.), CA-80789 (to A.M.M.), and EY-03306 (to I.K.G.) and by the Harvard Digestive Diseases Center.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
Online version of this article contains video
material for certain figures. Online version available at
www.molbiolcell.org.
Corresponding author. E-mail address:
irabinov{at}caregroup.harvard.edu.
| |
ABBREVIATIONS |
|---|
Abbreviations used: BM, basement membrane; ECM, extracellular, BDM, butanedione monoxime.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|