|
|
|
|
Vol. 12, Issue 4, 1093-1101, April 2001
and
*University of Cambridge, Wellcome Trust Center for Molecular
Mechanisms in Disease, Cambridge Institute for Medical Research,
and Department of Clinical Biochemistry, Cambridge CB2 2XY, United
Kingdom; and
Lehrstuhl für Zellbiologie und
Pflanzenphysiologie, Universität Regensburg, 93053 Regensburg,
Germany
| |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Secretory proteins that fail to fold in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) are transported back to the cytosol and degraded by proteasomes. It remains unclear how the cell distinguishes between folding intermediates and misfolded proteins. We asked whether misfolded secretory proteins are covalently modified in the ER before export. We found that a fraction of mutant alpha-factor precursor, but not the wild type, was progressively O-mannosylated in microsomes and in intact yeast cells by protein O-mannosyl transferase 2 (Pmt2p). O-Mannosylation increased significantly in vitro under ER export conditions, i.e., in the presence of ATP and cytosol, and this required export-proficient Sec61p in the ER membrane. Deletion of PMT2, however, did not abrogate mutant alpha-factor precursor degradation but, rather, enhanced its turnover in intact yeast cells. In vitro, O-mannosylated mutant alpha-factor precursor was stable and protease protected, and a fraction was associated with Sec61p in the ER lumen. Thus, prolonged ER residence allows modification of exposed O-mannosyl acceptor sites in misfolded proteins, which abrogates misfolded protein export from the ER at a posttargeting stage. We conclude that there is a limited window of time during which misfolded proteins can be removed from the ER before they acquire inappropriate modifications that can interfere with disposal through the Sec61 channel.
| |
INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Secretory proteins fold in the lumen of the endoplasmic reticulum
(ER; Ellgaard et al., 1999
). Only fully folded proteins are
packaged into ER-to-Golgi transport vesicles and transported through
the secretory pathway (Ellgaard et al., 1999
). Proteins that
fail to acquire their native conformation are retained in the ER, at
least initially by interaction with ER-resident chaperones (Ellgaard
et al., 1999
; Römisch, 1999
). Many misfolded proteins are subsequently transported back across the ER membrane to the cytosol
where they are degraded by proteasomes (Ellgaard et al., 1999
; Römisch, 1999
). It remains unclear how the cell
distinguishes between chaperone-associated folding intermediates and
misfolded proteins and at which point the decision is made to target an aberrant protein to export and degradation (Römisch, 1999
;
Parodi, 2000
). For N-glycosylated misfolded proteins, the
"timer" that triggers retrograde transport may be trimming of the
N-glycan mannoses (Ellgaard et al., 1999
; Cabral
et al., 2000
; Parodi, 2000
). In the cases studied, only
mannose-trimmed glycoproteins were subject to retrograde transport and
degradation; inhibition of mannose-trimming resulted in the retention
of the misfolded glycoproteins in the ER lumen, suggesting that a
mannose-specific lectin recognizes export substrates and targets them
to degradation (reviewed by Parodi, 2000
).
Retrograde protein transport across the ER membrane to the cytosol is
mediated by a channel that is formed by the same core component as the
protein translocation channel that mediates secretory protein import
into the ER lumen (Römisch, 1999
). Specific mutations in this
protein, Sec61p, interfere differentially with protein import
and protein export, and sec61 mutants that specifically block retrograde protein transport have recently been isolated by Zhou
and Schekman (Pilon et al., 1997
, 1998
; Plemper et
al., 1997
; Zhou and Schekman, 1999
). The location of these point
mutations suggests that the mutated sites are interaction sites of
Sec61p with ER luminal or transmembrane proteins that may be involved in targeting of substrates to the export channel (Römisch, 1999
; Zhou and Schekman, 1999
). Specific interaction partners of Sec61p during retrograde protein transport across the ER membrane are still unknown.
The heterotrimeric Sec61 complex in the ER membrane consists of Sec61p,
a 53-kDa protein with 10 transmembrane domains, and two smaller
tail-anchored proteins, Sbh1p, and Ssh1p (Johnson and van Waes, 1999
).
The Sec61 channel is formed by four or five Sec61 complexes that
assemble in the ER membrane for protein import into the ER in response
to the presence of a functional signal peptide or in the presence of
the Sec63 complex, which is required for posttranslational protein
import into the yeast ER (Hanein et al., 1996
). The Sec61
channel is sealed at both ends to maintain the permeability barrier
across the ER membrane (Hamman et al., 1998
). Channel
opening for protein import is triggered by functional signal peptides
that are recognized by the Sec61 channel itself (Jungnickel and
Rapoport, 1995
). The signal peptide of most misfolded secretory
proteins, however, is cleaved off before retrograde transport is
initiated. Channel opening from the ER lumen must therefore be
triggered by a fundamentally different mechanism (Römisch, 1999
).
To identify a targeting signal for retrograde protein transport, we
asked whether mutant secretory proteins are covalently modified in the
ER lumen before export. As a substrate we used a mutant form of the
yeast pheromone precursor prepro alpha-factor, which had its
N-glycosylation acceptor sites removed by site-directed mutagenesis (Mayinger and Meyer, 1993
). The N-glycosylation
site mutant alpha-factor precursor protein (
gp
f) is
subject to ER-associated degradation in vivo and in a cell-free assay
based on yeast microsomes and cytosol (McCracken and Brodsky, 1996
). We
found that a fraction of
gp
f, but not the wild-type precursor,
was covalently modified in microsomes and in intact yeast cells. This
modification was significantly enhanced in vitro under ER export
conditions, i.e., in the presence of ATP and cytosol, and required the
presence of export-competent Sec61p in the membranes. We identified the modification as O-mannosylation and Pmt2p in the ER as the
responsible enzyme. Deletion of the corresponding gene,
PMT2, however, did not abrogate
gp
f degradation but
rather increased its turnover both in vitro and in vivo. In wild-type
microsomes, the O-mannosylated fraction of
gp
f was
stable, protease protected, and accumulated in the ER lumen over the
time course of a degradation reaction. A fraction of m
gp
f could
be cross-linked to Sec61p. Our data suggest that
O-mannosylation of
gp
f interferes with its retrograde transport across the ER membrane at a posttargeting stage.
| |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Strains and Growth Conditions
The following strains were used: RSY255 (MAT
leu2-3,-112 ura3-52; (Stirling et al., 1992
),
RSY1293 (MAT
can1-100 his3-11,-15 leu2-3,-112
trp1-1 ura3-1 ade2-1 sec61::HIS3
pDQ1[sec61-his6] or pDQ1 expressing the indicated
sec61 mutants (Pilon et al., 1997
), WCG4a
(MATa leu2-3,-112 ura3 his3-11,-15 (Hiller et
al., 1996
), WCG4-2 (MATa leu2-3,-112 ura3 his3-11,-15 pre1
pre2 [Hiller et al., 1996
]); RSY281
(MAT
sec23-1 ura3-52 his4-619 [Hicke et al., 1992
]); SEY6210 (MAT
ura3-52 leu2-3,-112
his3-
200 trp1-
901 lys2-801,
suc2-
9 [Gentzsch and Tanner, 1996
]); SEY6211
(MAT a ura3-52 leu2-3,-112 his3-
200
trp1-
901 ade2-101, suc2-
9 [Gentzsch and Tanner, 1996
]); SEY6210 pmt5::URA3, SEY6210
pmt6::URA3, SEY6210 pmt2::LEU2; all pmt double and triple
mutants used were progeny from crosses of SEY6210
pmt3::HIS3 pmt4::TRP1 with SEY6211
pmt1::URA3 pmt2::LEU2 (Gentzsch and
Tanner, 1996
). TF1.8 (MATa ura3 leu2 his3 GAL1-PMT1-LEU2
(Gentzsch et al., 1995
) transformed with YEp352 or
YEp352[PMT2]. Yeast were grown in YPD (1% yeast extract, 2% peptone [Difco, Detroit, MI], 2% dextrose) or synthetic media with
the appropriate additions (Sherman, 1991
).
Pulse-Chase Experiments
Cells were radiolabeled and lysed, and proteins were
immunoprecipitated or precipitated with concanavalin A (ConA)-Sepharose as in described by Gillece et al. (1999)
.
Lectin-precipitated samples were eluted with 1 M
-methyl mannoside
in 20 mM Tris-HCl, pH7.5, 150 mM NaCl, 2 mM EDTA for 1 h at
30°C. Where indicated, samples were treated with 2 mU peptide
N-glycosidase (PNGase) F (Roche Diagnostics Ltd., Lewes,
United Kingdom) for 2 h at 37°C before electrophoresis.
[3H]Mannose Labeling
The method used was modified from Orlean et al.
(1991)
. Cells were grown to OD600 = 0.5 in full
or selective medium with 0.6% sucrose as a carbon source, washed once
in fresh medium labeled with 1 mCi of
[3H]mannose (Amersham, Arlington Heights, IL)
per 1.5 OD600 of cells in 500 µl of medium for
90 min at the indicated temperature. Cells were lysed, and proteins
were immunoprecipitated as above, resolved on 16% or 7.5% SDS-PAGE,
and detected by fluorography.
Cell Fractionation
Microsomes for in vitro degradation assays were prepared from
cells grown to OD600 = 1 as described by Pilon
et al. (1997)
. Microsomes from PMT wild-type and
mutant strains for the experiment shown in Figure 3A were prepared
using the same method, but the sucrose gradient purification was
omitted. Cytosol was prepared from WCG4a by liquid nitrogen lysis as
described by Pilon et al. (1997)
.
Translocation and ConA Precipitation
In vitro translated,
[35S]methionine-labeled nonglycosylated
alpha-factor precursor (p
gp
f) or wild-type precursor (pp
f)
were translocated into wild-type or pmt mutant microsomes
for the indicated periods of time in the presence of ATP and an
ATP-regenerating system (40 mM creatine phosphate, 0.2 mg/ml creatine
phosphokinase, 1 mM ATP, 50 µM GDP-mannose) in B88 (20 mM HEPES, pH
6.8, 150 mM potassium acetate, 5 mM magnesium acetate, 250 mM sorbitol) at 24°C. At the end of the incubation period, SDS was added to 1%,
samples were heated to 95°C for 5 min, and mannosylated
signal-cleaved
gp
f precipitated with ConA-Sepharose (Pharmacia,
Piscataway, NJ). Wild-type p
f was immunoprecipitated,
deN-glycosylated with PNGase F (Boehringer), and
subsequently precipitated with ConA-Sepharose.
ER Degradation Assay and Cross-Linking
ER degradation of
gp
f was assayed at 24°C as described
by Pilon et al. (1997)
. Briefly, 20-µl translocation
reactions contained 2 µl of microsomes of OD280 = 30, B88, ATP, a regenerating system, and 2 µl of in vitro
translated, 35S-labeled p
gp
f (500,000 cpm).
Translocation reactions were incubated for 50 min at 24°C, and the
membranes were washed twice in B88. Membranes containing
gp
f were
resuspended in B88 with ATP and the regenerating system, and
degradation reactions were started by adding cytosol to 6 mg/ml final
concentration in a 20-µl/reaction final volume. Degradation reactions
were incubated at 24°C for the indicated periods of time. At the end
of the incubation, samples were precipitated with trichloroacetic acid
(TCA) and analyzed after electrophoresis on 18% polyacrylamide, 4 M
urea SDS gels with a Cyclone phosphorimager (Hewlett-Packard,
Bracknell, United Kingdom). The
gp
f and mannosylated
gp
f (m
gp
f) bands were quantified and expressed as
percentages of
gpaf at the beginning of the reaction (time 0).
Cross-linking was performed with DSP as described by Pilon et
al. (1997)
. Individual samples were 10× scaled up reactions as
described above. Cross-linking was initiated after 10 min of incubation
in the presence of ATP, the regenerating system, and 6 mg/ml yeast
cytosol at 24°C.
| |
RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Mutant Alpha-Factor Precursor Is O-Mannosylated in the ER
Misfolded secretory proteins are exported from the ER to the
cytosol through the Sec61 channel after their signal sequences have
been cleaved off (Römisch, 1999
). We therefore asked whether misfolded proteins in the ER acquire a covalent modification that serves as an export signal during prolonged residence in the ER lumen.
As substrate proteins we used
[35S]methionine-labeled, in vitro translated
wild-type alpha-factor precursor (pp
f) or a mutant counterpart in
which the three N-glycosylation acceptor sites in the
proregion had been destroyed by site-directed mutagenesis (p
gp
f)
(Mayinger and Meyer, 1993
; McCracken and Brodsky, 1996
). In the
presence of ATP and an ATP-regenerating system, both proteins can be
translocated into yeast microsomes posttranslationally, resulting in
signal cleaved mutant alpha-factor precursor (
gp
f) and
signal-cleaved, triply N-glycosylated wild-type alpha-factor
precursor (3gp
f), respectively. Posttranslational protein import
into the ER is essentially complete after a 10-min incubation at
24°C; nevertheless, we had observed previously that retrograde
transport of a mutant secretory protein from the ER in vitro was more
efficient after extended import reactions (K.R., unpublished data). We
therefore suspected that the export substrate might be modified during
its prolonged residence in the ER lumen. When we incubated yeast
microsomes containing
gp
f for 50 min at 24°C, we detected a
small increase in molecular weight of a fraction of
gp
f
(m
gp
f, Figure 1A, compare lanes 1, 2 and 5, 6). Concomitantly with the molecular weight shift, this form
of
gp
f acquired an affinity for the mannose-specific lectin ConA (m
gp
f, Figure 1A, compare lanes 3, 4 and 7, 8). Because
gp
f no longer contains any N-glycosylation sites, these data
suggest that the protein might be O-mannosylated. In yeast,
protein O-mannosylation is initiated in the ER lumen by the
transfer of a single mannosyl residue from dolichol-P-mannose to
specific serine and threonine residues of the substrate
(Strahl-Bolsinger et al., 1999
). So far,
O-mannosylation of alpha-factor precursor has not been
reported. To investigate whether the wild-type precursor acquired the
same modification, after incubation of yeast microsomes containing wild-type 3gp
f for 50 min at 24°C, we removed the
N-glycans of the wild-type precursor with PNGase F before
precipitation with ConA-Sepharose (Figure 1A, lanes 9-12). We found
that none of de-N-glycosylated wild-type precursor (p
f)
bound to the lectin (Figure 1A, lanes 11, 12 versus 13, 14). We
conclude that the mutant, but not the wild-type precursor, is likely to
be O-mannosylated after prolonged residence in the ER lumen
in vitro.
|
We next asked whether
gp
f was also modified in intact yeast cells
and whether again the modification was specific to the mutant
precursor. To this end, we labeled intact yeast cells with [3H]mannose for 90 min. Steady-state labeling
is required to be able to detect mannose incorporation into secretory
proteins (Orlean et al., 1991
). We found, however, that at
steady state there was no detectable amount of wild-type alpha-factor
precursor present inside the cells, even if the protein was
overexpressed from a 2µ plasmid, because of its efficient processing
and secretion. To compare wild-type and mutant alpha-factor precursor
in vivo, we therefore performed the experiment in a strain that carries a temperature-sensitive mutation in Sec23p, a protein essential for
ER-to-Golgi transport vesicle budding from the ER (RSY281; Hicke
et al., 1992
). After [3H]mannose
labeling of RSY281-overexpressing pp
f at the permissive temperature
(24°C), as in wild-type cells we were unable to detect intracellular
wild-type alpha-factor precursor because of its rapid transport to the
cell surface (Figure 1B, lanes 1 and 2). In contrast, after
[3H]mannose labeling of RSY281-expressing
p
gp
f at 24°C, we were able to immunoprecipitate a
mannose-labeled form of the mutant precursor that was refractory to
PNGase digestion and that migrated in the appropriate position for
m
gp
f (Figure 1B, lanes 5 and 6). To investigate whether the
wild-type precursor could be O-mannosylated in vivo if its
residence time in the ER was increased, we performed the
[3H]mannose labeling of RSY281 overexpressing
pp
f at the restrictive temperature for vesicle budding from the ER
(37°C). At 37°C, ER-to-Golgi transport in RSY281 ceases, as evident
from the accumulation of the ER-specific form of carboxypeptidase Y in
the cells (p1CPY, Figure 1B, bottom, compare lanes 24 and 37). Under
these conditions we were indeed able to detect intracellular,
mannose-labeled forms of wild-type alpha-factor precursor (Figure 1B,
lane 3). The majority of the incorporated
[3H]mannose, however, could be removed from the
wild-type precursor by PNGase F digestion, suggesting that the label
had been primarily incorporated into the N-glycans of
singly, doubly, and triply N-glycosylated wild-type
precursor (1gp
f, 2gp
f, 3gp
f, Figure 1B, compare lanes 3 and
4). The small fraction of wild-type precursor whose position in the gel
suggested that it had not been N-glycosylated after
translocation into the ER, however, incorporated
[3H]mannose in a PNGase-resistant manner like
the mutant precursor (m
gp
f, Figure 1B, lanes 3 and 4). Our data
suggest that in the absence of N-glycans alpha-factor
precursor is O-mannosylated during prolonged residence in
the ER.
O-Mannosylation of Mutant Alpha-Factor Precursor In Vitro Is Stimulated by ATP and Cytosol and Requires Export-Proficient Sec61p
Export of misfolded secretory proteins from the ER through the
Sec61 channel and their degradation by proteasomes can be reconstituted in a cell-free system based on yeast microsomes and cytosol (McCracken and Brodsky, 1996
). Incubation of wild-type yeast microsomes containing
gp
f in the presence of ATP, an ATP-regenerating system, and 6 mg/ml wild-type yeast cytosol results in a disappearance of the
gp
f band with a half life of ~12 min (Figure
2, left; McCracken and Brodsky, 1996
).
Concomitantly with the decrease in
gp
f, we also observed a
further molecular weight increase of a fraction of
gp
f
(m
gp
f, Figure 2, left). This molecular weight shift was due to an
increased mannosylation of
gp
f under export conditions, as
demonstrated by ConA precipitation of the newly appearing bands (m
gp
f, Figure 4, top). Like
gp
f export and degradation,
increased O-mannosylation was dependent on the presence of
ATP and cytosol (Figure 2, left). In contrast to
gp
f degradation,
however, O-mannosylation did not require functional
proteasomes in the cytosol (Figure 2, right). Surprisingly, we found
that O-mannosylation of
gp
f in the ER was dramatically
reduced in microsomes derived from export-deficient sec61
mutant strains, suggesting that the O-mannosylation of this
substrate required at least the initiation of its export to the cytosol
(Figure 2, middle, compare SEC61 to sec61-32 and sec61-41; Pilon et al., 1997
). We conclude that,
in vitro, conditions that promote misfolded protein export from the ER
stimulate O-mannosylation of mutant alpha-factor precursor.
|
Pmt2p Is Responsible for Mutant Alpha-Factor Precursor O-Mannosylation but Not Required for Its Degradation
Based on the stimulation of
gp
f O-mannosylation
under ER export conditions and its SEC61 dependence, we
assumed that O-mannosylation was intimately linked to
gp
f export through the Sec61 channel and that the
O-mannosylated bands might be export intermediates. We
therefore sought to identify the protein O-mannosyl
transferase (Pmt) responsible for
gp
f O-mannosylation.
There are seven PMT genes in the Saccharomyces
cerevisiae genome. For Pmt1p-Pmt4p and Pmt6p, mannosyl transferase
activity has been demonstrated (Strahl-Bolsinger et al.,
1999
). The individual transferases show distinct specificities toward
their protein substrates (Gentzsch and Tanner, 1996
, 1997
). The active
sites of the Pmts are predicted to be on the luminal face of the ER
membrane (Girrbach et al., 2000
). The transferases Pmt1p and
Pmt2p have been shown to act as heterodimers in vitro and in vivo
(Girrbach et al., 2000
). We prepared microsomes from all
viable pmt1-4 double and triple mutants and from strains
with individual deletions of PMT5 and PMT6
(Gentzsch and Tanner, 1996
); we subsequently translocated p
gp
f
into wild-type and pmt mutant microsomes for 50 min at 24°C, lysed the membranes, and assessed
gp
f mannosylation by precipitation with ConA-Sepharose. We found that all mutants with a
deletion of PMT2 were defective in
gp
f
O-mannosylation (Figure 3A).
Deletion of PMT2 on its own also resulted in lack of
gp
f O-mannosylation, and no stimulation of
gp
f
O-mannosylation was seen in the presence of ATP and cytosol
in
pmt2 microsomes.
|
We then investigated whether O-mannosylation was required
for
gp
f degradation. We transformed PMT2 wild-type and
pmt2 strains with a plasmid expressing p
gp
f and
performed pulse-chase experiments. As shown in Figure 3B, we found that
mannosylation by Pmt2p was dispensable for
gp
f turnover and that,
in fact, the half-life of
gp
f was slightly reduced in the
pmt2 strain, suggesting that O-mannosylation
of
gp
f interfered with its degradation (Figure 3B, half-time of
gp
f in PMT2 = 12 min, in
pmt2 =10 min). This observation was confirmed in vitro where we observed a
slightly reduced half-life of
gp
f in pmt2pmt4 mutant
microsomes. The expression levels of p
gp
f were similar in
PMT2 wild-type and
pmt2 cells, but by
quantitative immunoblotting we found that the increased
turnover of
gp
f in
pmt2 cells resulted in a
reduction to ~50% of intracellular
gp
f compared with wild-type
cells. We observed no effects of PMT2 deletion on vesicular
transport of wild-type or mutant alpha-factor precursor and CPY and no
effects on alpha-factor secretion. Deletion of PMT2 also did
not affect the ER export and degradation of a mutant form of CPY, CPY*;
nor did we observe O-mannosylation of CPY*. We conclude that
gp
f is specifically O-mannosylated by Pmt2p in the ER
and that this modification is not required for
gp
f degradation.
O-Mannosylation Protects Mutant Alpha-Factor Precursor from Export to the Cytosol
The increased turnover of
gp
f in
pmt2 cells
raised the possibility that mannosylation interfered with the
degradation of
gp
f. We therefore investigated the fate of
m
gp
f during a degradation time course in vitro. We incubated
wild-type microsomes containing
gp
f in the presence of ATP, an
ATP-regenerating system, and 6 mg/ml wild-type cytosol for up to 60 min
at 24°C and at each time point precipitated one aliquot with TCA and
ConA-precipitated m
gp
f from twice the amount of material. We
found that over time
gp
f was increasingly
O-mannosylated, which resulted in an increased molecular
weight close to the position on p
gp
f on 18% polyacrylamide 4 M
urea gels (Figure 4A, top). The highly
O-mannosylated form was not subject to degradation, however,
but accumulated during the time course of the reaction (Figure 4A,
top).
|
To clarify whether mannosylation interfered with degradation of
gp
f by cytosolic proteasomes, or whether the modification prevented export of m
gp
f from the ER lumen to the cytosol, we performed protease protection experiments. At each time point during a
degradation reaction. we transferred samples to ice and digested them
with 0.1 mg/ml proteinase K for 20 min. We found that the mannosylated
forms of
gp
f were refractory to proteinase K digestion in
contrast to p
gp
f, which is associated with the cytosolic face of
the microsomes and was protease sensitive (Figure 4A, bottom). In the
presence of 0.1% Triton X-100, m
gp
f was fully digested by
proteinase K. Our data suggest that m
gp
f resides in the lumen of
the ER and, thus, that O-mannosylation of
gp
f interferes with its export through the Sec61 channel to the cytosol.
We next asked whether overexpression of PMT2 would lead to retention of
a higher proportion of
gp
f in the ER. We found that to increase
Pmt2p activity, we needed to co-overexpress PMT1 and PMT2. Expression of PMT2 from a 2µ plasmid in a
strain that had PMT1 integrated under control of the
GAL1 promoter resulted in a threefold increase of
mannosyl-transferase activity in vitro (S.S., unpublished data). In
microsomes derived from this strain,
gp
f was maximally
O-mannosylated with a half-life of <10 min (Figure 4B, top) in
contrast to wild-type microsomes, in which the maximally
O-mannosylated form appeared with a half-life of 20-30 min
(Figure 4A, top, ConA). The proportion of
gp
f that was
O-mannosylated did not change significantly upon
PMT1/2 overexpression, however, and consistent with this
observation there was no effect of turnover of
gp
f (Figure 4, A
and B, top, and data not shown).
We suspected that O-mannosylation might stabilize a
nonproductive interaction of m
gp
f with the Sec61 channel, which
would thus lead to increased mannosylation if higher Pmt2 activity was present in the ER membrane. We investigated whether m
gp
f could be
cross-linked to Sec61p. The cross-linking efficiency of
gp
f to
Sec61p is low (1-2%; Pilon et al., 1997
), and the maximal proportion of
gp
f that was mannosylated in the ER was <20% (Figure 2). To
maximize our chances for detecting m
gp
f interacting with Sec61p,
we performed the cross-linking experiment in microsomes derived from
PMT1/2-overexpressing cells, in which most m
gp
f is
present as a single, highly mannosylated band that migrates close to
the signal sequence containing p
gp
f in our gel system (Figure 4A,
bottom). Wild-type microsomes and microsomes derived from a
pmt2/4 deletion strain, in which
gp
f
mannosylation is reduced (Figure 3A), were included as controls. Mutant
alpha-factor precursor was translocated into the microsomes; the
membranes were washed and incubated with ATP, an ATP-regenerating
system, and 6 mg/ml cytosol for 10 min at 24°C before cross-linking
was initiated. Membranes were lysed, and Sec61p and associated proteins were immunoprecipitated with affinity-purified Sec61 antibodies. Cross-links were cleaved with dithiothreitol before electrophoresis on
18% 4 M urea SDS gels. The amount of signal-cleaved
gp
f
associated with Sec61p was proportional to the amount of
gp
f in
the ER lumen and identical for wild-type and
PMT1/2-overexpressing microsomes (Figure 4B, bottom, compare
X-link and TCA). In wild-type and
pmt2/4
microsomes, a small amount of cytosolic p
gp
f was found cross-linked to Sec61p (Figure 4B, bottom). In
PMT1/2-overexpressing microsomes, the intensity of this
upper band was increased approximately threefold (Figure 4B, bottom,
X-link). This increase was dependent on the presence of cross-linking
reagent and Sec61 antibodies and corresponds well to the increased
amount of maximally mannosylated
sp
f present in these microsomes
(ConA, bottom, Figure 4B). Sec61p itself is not glycosylated, but a
fraction of the Sec61 complex in the ER membrane is bound to the
glycoprotein-containing Sec63 complex. We were therefore unable to
determine the association of Sec61p with m
gp
f by lectin
precipitation. Because we observed no change in the amount of
p
gp
f associated with the cytoplasmic face of
PMT1/2-overexpressing microsomes, however, we conclude that
the upper band found associated with Sec61p in the cross-linking experiment in PMT1/2-overexpressing microsomes consists
primarily of highly mannosylated
gp
f. Interestingly, this
interaction was specific for the highly mannosylated form of
gp
f;
the fast migrating m
gp
f band could not be cross-linked to Sec61p
(Figure 4B, bottom, ConA versus X-link).
Competition between N-Glycosylation and O-Mannosylation in the ER
Do N-linked and O-linked glycosylation
compete in proteins other than alpha-factor precursor?
N-glycosylation acceptor sites are well defined (N-X-S/T),
but there is currently no known consensus acceptor site for
O-linked mannosylation; thus, the general proximity or the
degree of overlap between the two types of acceptor sites could not be
determined by studying the available protein data bases
(Strahl-Bolsinger et al., 1999
). We therefore addressed the question
experimentally. We metabolically labeled wild-type yeast with
[35S]methionine/cysteine for 10 min at 30°C
in the absence or presence of the N-glycosylation inhibitor
tunicamycin. Cells were lysed, and a protein with five
N-glycosylation acceptor sites, protein disulfide isomerase
(PDI), was immunoprecipitated. Immunocomplexes were digested with
PNGase F or mock incubated, followed by precipitation with the
mannose-specific lectin ConA. In the absence of tunicamycin, PDI is
heterogeneously N-glycosylated on four or five of its five acceptor sites and therefore binds to ConA (Figure
5, top, lanes 1 and 2; gPDI). PNGase
treatment removes the N-glycosyl side chains and results in
complete loss of affinity of PDI for the lectin (Figure 5, top, lanes 3 and 4). PDI isolated from tunicamycin-treated cells migrates at a lower
mobility, consistent with lack of N-glycosyl side chains,
but a fraction of non-N-glycosylated PDI nevertheless binds
to ConA (Figure 5, top, lanes 5 and 6; mPDI). Digestion of PDI isolated
from tunicamycin-treated cells with PNGase does not alter its mobility
on the gel or its ability to bind to ConA (Figure 5, top, lanes 7 and
8; mPDI). Our data suggest that like alpha-factor precursor PDI can be
O-mannosylated in the absence of N-glycosylation.
|
How general is the competition of N-glycosylation and O-mannosylation in the ER? To answer this question, we labeled wild-type cells in the presence or absence of tunicamycin, as above, and precipitated glycoproteins with ConA-Sepharose. Lectin precipitates were PNGase treated or mock incubated and subsequently subjected to a second round of ConA precipitation. We found that an increased proportion of glycoproteins isolated from tunicamycin-treated cells bound to ConA-Sepharose in a PNGase-resistant manner (Figure 5, bottom, compare lanes 3, 4 to 7, 8; 35% increase in total signal). Our data confirm that the competition of N- and O-linked glycosylation that we documented for two specific proteins, alpha-factor precursor and PDI, is a general phenomenon in the ER that affects a large number of proteins.
| |
DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
We have shown that a misfolded secretory protein,
gp
f, is
specifically O-mannosylated in the ER lumen by Pmt2p. This
O-mannosylation is stimulated in vitro by the presence of
ATP and cytosol and requires functional Sec61p, suggesting that
O-mannosylation is linked to the initiation of misfolded
protein export from the ER through the Sec61 channel. The
O-mannosylated fraction of
gp
f, however, is not
transported to the cytosol but remains protease protected in the ER
lumen and is therefore stable. In addition, a fraction of m
gp
f is
associated with Sec61p. Our work demonstrates that there is a limited
window of time during which misfolded proteins can be removed from the
ER before they acquire inappropriate modifications that can interfere
with protein disposal through the Sec61 channel.
The yeast ER contains several O-mannosyl transferases with
distinct substrate specificities (Gentzsch and Tanner, 1996
, 1997
). The
basis of substrate recognition has been difficult to characterize; the
correlation between data derived from peptide substrates and protein
substrates is poor, suggesting that protein conformation contributes
significantly to the recognition of O-mannosyl acceptor sites by Pmts (Strahl-Bolsinger et al., 1999
). Wild-type
alpha-factor precursor is N-glycosylated at three sites in
its proregion (Kurjan and Herskowitz, 1982
). Conversion of the
asparagine residues in the N-glycosyl acceptor sites to
glutamine residues results in a protein that is recognized in the ER as
misfolded and subsequently transported to the cytosol for disposal by
the proteasomes (Mayinger and Meyer, 1993
; McCracken and Brodsky,
1996
). Most serine and threonine residues in alpha-factor precursor
that could serve as O-mannosyl acceptors are clustered
around the N-glycosylation sites (Kurjan and Herskowitz,
1982
). Our finding that only non-N-glycosylated alpha-factor
precursor is O-mannosylated suggests that access to the
O-mannosyl acceptor sites in the N-glycosylated
precursor is sterically blocked by the N-glycans.
Alternatively, N-glycosylation may introduce a
conformational change into the gp
f proregion that prevents its
O-mannosylation by Pmt2p.
N-glycosylation of wild-type alpha-factor precursor is
rapid and efficient and is initiated during import into the ER (Figure 1A, K.R. unpublished data). By contrast, O-mannosylation of
gp
f is inefficient and slow (Figure 1A). The fact that
significant O-glycosylation occurs only after prolonged incubation of
yeast microsomes containing
gp
f at physiological temperature
suggests that it is a posttranslocational event (Figure 1A). Similarly, a polytopic ER membrane protein fused to a degradation signal, Deg1-Hmg1p, is only glycosylated under conditions that prevent its
degradation and therefore prolong its residence in the ER (Wilhovsky
et al., 2000
); the nature of the glycosylation, however, was
not identified in this case. The addition of ATP and cytosol, which
promote targeting of
gp
f to the Sec61 channel for export, stimulates
gp
f O-mannosylation (Figure 2). This
increased O-mannosylation is dependent on export-competent
Sec61 channels, suggesting that the substrate may be in contact with
the export channel when it is mannosylated (Figure 2). This was
confirmed by cross-linking m
gp
f to Sec61p (Figure 4B). The Pmts
in the ER are polytopic transmembrane proteins with large ER-luminal
domains containing the active sites (Girrbach et al., 2000
).
It is therefore conceivable that Pmts modify membrane-associated
substrates more efficiently; Pmts may even be located in close
proximity to the translocon, which would ensure that wild-type
secretory proteins with O-mannosyl acceptor sites are
modified efficiently and without interference from protein folding
during entry into the ER through the Sec61 channel. This notion is
supported by the observation that in vitro only short peptides and
partially hydrolyzed proteins are modified by Pmts, but fully folded
proteins are not substrates for O-mannosylation ((Strahl-Bolsinger et al., 1999
; S.S., unpublished data). In
their preference for unfolded substrates, Pmts resemble glucosyl
transferase in the ER lumen, which specifically tags unfolded proteins
(Parodi, 2000
).
Because alpha-factor precursor is not normally a substrate for
O-mannosylation, it is possible that its orientation in the translocation channel during import is incompatible with
O-mannosylation but that it exposes the appropriate sites
during initiation of export (Figures 1 and 2). An alternative
explanation may be that import of p
gp
f into the ER is extremely
rapid and efficient, whereas export proceeds with much slower kinetics
and may therefore result in prolonged exposure of O-mannosyl
acceptor sites in the appropriate vicinity of Pmt2p. A third
possibility is that the Sec63 complex associated with the Sec61 channel
during posttranslational p
gp
f import into the ER interferes with
access of Pmt2p to proteins in the translocon (Panzner et
al., 1995
). The Sec63 complex is not required for misfolded
protein export from the ER and thus most likely absent from Sec61
channels engaged in export, which may allow mannosylation of export
substrates by Pmt2p (Pilon et al., 1997
).
We have demonstrated that m
gp
f remains in the ER lumen, which
suggests that the O-mannosyl moieties prevent export through the Sec61 channel (Figure 4). O-mannosylation is largely
Sec61 dependent, suggesting that the modification occurs after the
export substrate has made contact with the Sec61 channel (Figures 2 and 4B); O-mannosylation therefore aborts export at a
posttargeting step (Figure 4B). Protease digestion of microsomes
containing mannosyl-
gp
f did not result in any loss of signal or
in the occurrence of partially protease-protected intermediate bands (Figure 4A); because our gel system resolves size differences of <10
amino acids, our data suggest that m
gp
f is still fully contained
inside the ER lumen. It is so far unknown whether proteins insert into
the Sec61 channel for export with their N or their C termini first. The
lack of protease-protected, O-mannosylated export
intermediates combined with the fact that all serine and threonine
residues of
gp
f that can serve as O-mannosyl acceptor sites are contained in the proregion of the protein
the first is close
to the extreme N terminus of the signal-cleaved protein at amino acid
position 5
may suggest that the N terminus of
gp
f interacts with
the Sec61 channel first and that O-mannosylation of the N
terminus aborts its subsequent insertion into the channel (Figure 4;
Kurjan and Herskowitz, 1982
). Given that misfolded proteins with
several N-glycans attached, such as CPY*, can be exported
through the Sec61 channel to the cytosol, we consider it unlikely that
O-mannosylation sterically interferes with protein transport
through the channel (Plemper et al., 1997
).
O-mannosylation may, however, introduce a conformational
change into or increase the rigidity of the alpha-factor precursor
proregion and thus abort export of the protein. One intriguing
alternative explanation for the effect of O-mannosylation on
mutant alpha-factor precursor export is that the O-mannosyl
acceptor sites in
gp
f precursor overlap with an essential
recognition motif for misfolded protein transport through the Sec61
channel to the cytosol, which may be recognized by the so far
uncharacterized machinery that drives misfolded protein export from the
ER.
| |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
We thank David Stokes for sparking our interest in O-linked glycosylation and Wiep Scheper for the data shown in Figure 4B and for critically reading the manuscript. K.R. is a Senior Fellow of The Wellcome Trust (grant 042216).
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
Corresponding author. E-mail:
kbr20{at}cam.ac.uk.
| |
ABBREVIATIONS |
|---|
Abbreviations used:
ConA, concanavalin A;
ER, endoplasmic
reticulum;
gp
f, N-glycosylation site mutant
alpha-factor precursor;
m
gp
f, mannosylated
gp
f;
PDI, protein disulfide isomerase;
Pmt, protein mannosyl transferase;
PNGase, peptide N-glycosidase;
TCA, trichloroacetic acid.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
H. Hirayama, M. Fujita, T. Yoko-o, and Y. Jigami O-Mannosylation is Required for Degradation of the Endoplasmic Reticulum-associated Degradation Substrate Gas1*p via the Ubiquitin/Proteasome Pathway in Saccharomyces cerevisiae J. Biochem., April 1, 2008; 143(4): 555 - 567. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Kuroda, K. Kobayashi, Y. Kitagawa, T. Nakagawa, H. Tsumura, T. Komeda, D. Shinmi, E. Mori, K. Motoki, K. Fuju, et al. Efficient Antibody Production upon Suppression of O Mannosylation in the Yeast Ogataea minuta Appl. Envir. Microbiol., January 15, 2008; 74(2): 446 - 453. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Manya, T. Suzuki, K. Akasaka-Manya, H.-K. Ishida, M. Mizuno, Y. Suzuki, T. Inazu, N. Dohmae, and T. Endo Regulation of Mammalian Protein O-Mannosylation: PREFERENTIAL AMINO ACID SEQUENCE FOR O-MANNOSE MODIFICATION J. Biol. Chem., July 13, 2007; 282(28): 20200 - 20206. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |