|
|
|
|
Vol. 12, Issue 8, 2364-2377, August 2001



and
*Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, and
the Plant
Cell Biology Research Centre, School of Botany, The
University of Melbourne, Victoria 3010, Australia
| |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The cell surface of the human parasite Leishmania mexicana is coated with glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI)-anchored macromolecules and free GPI glycolipids. We have investigated the intracellular trafficking of green fluorescent protein- and hemagglutinin-tagged forms of dolichol-phosphate-mannose synthase (DPMS), a key enzyme in GPI biosynthesis in L. mexicana promastigotes. These functionally active chimeras are found in the same subcompartment of the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) as endogenous DPMS but are degraded as logarithmically growing promastigotes reach stationary phase, coincident with the down-regulation of endogenous DPMS activity and GPI biosynthesis in these cells. We provide evidence that these chimeras are constitutively transported to and degraded in a novel multivesicular tubule (MVT) lysosome. This organelle is a terminal lysosome, which is labeled with the endocytic marker FM 4-64, contains lysosomal cysteine and serine proteases and is disrupted by lysomorphotropic agents. Electron microscopy and subcellular fractionation studies suggest that the DPMS chimeras are transported from the ER to the lumen of the MVT via the Golgi apparatus and a population of 200-nm multivesicular bodies. In contrast, soluble ER proteins are not detectably transported to the MVT lysosome in either log or stationary phase promastigotes. Finally, the increased degradation of the DPMS chimeras in stationary phase promastigotes coincides with an increase in the lytic capacity of the MVT lysosome and changes in the morphology of this organelle. We conclude that lysosomal degradation of DPMS may be important in regulating the cellular levels of this enzyme and the stage-dependent biosynthesis of the major surface glycolipids of these parasites.
| |
INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Glycosylphosphatidylinositols (GPIs) glycolipids are used
to anchor a diverse range of proteins to the plasma membrane in all
eukaryotic cells and may also be abundant membrane components in their
own right (Ferguson et al., 1999
; Tiede et al.,
1999
; McConville and Menon, 2000
). These glycolipids are assembled in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) by the sequential transfer of
monosaccharides and ethanolamine-phosphate to
phosphatidylinositol and anchor precursors subsequently
transferred en bloc to the C terminus of proteins with a GPI signal
sequence (Undenfriend and Kodukula, 1995
). GPI biosynthesis is
essential for the viability of yeast (Leidich et al., 1994
),
some protozoa (Ilgoutz et al., 1999a
; Nagamune et
al., 2000
), and mammalian embryogenesis (Nozaki et al.,
1999
), and the synthesis of GPI anchor precursors appears to be tightly
coupled to protein synthesis in the secretory pathway (Travers et
al., 2000
). However, little is known about how enzymes involved in
GPI biosynthesis and other ER glycosylation pathways are regulated
during eukaryotic growth and development.
GPI biosynthesis is the major ER glycosylation pathway in many
parasitic protozoa, including the sandfly-transmitted
Leishmania spp. that cause a number of important diseases in
humans (McConville and Ferguson, 1993
; Ferguson et al.,
1999
). The cell surfaces of these parasites are characteristically
coated by GPI-anchored glycoproteins. In addition,
Leishmania spp. synthesize an abundant GPI-anchored
lipophosphoglycan (LPG) and a family of free GPIs that are the major
glycolipids of these parasites (McConville and Blackwell, 1991
;
McConville and Ferguson, 1993
; Mengeling et al., 1997
; Ilg
et al., 1999
). These GPI-anchored macromolecules and free
GPIs are most highly expressed in the promastigote (sandfly) stage and
are thought to form a protective surface glycocalyx. They also mediate
specific host-parasite interactions in the midgut of the sandfly
vector and are required for promastigote invasion of macrophages in the
mammalian host (Ilg, 2000
; Sacks et al., 2000
; Spath
et al., 2000
). Recent studies with the use of L. mexicana promastigotes suggest that the protein anchor and LPG
anchor precursors and free GPIs are assembled on distinct
phosphatidylinositol molecular species in a subcompartment of
the ER (Ralton and McCon-ville, 1998
; Ilgoutz et al.,
1999b
). Furthermore, they suggest that the biosynthesis of
intermediates in these pathways is tightly regulated during parasite
growth and differentiation. In particular, we have recently shown that
the synthesis of all three GPI pools is markedly down-regulated as
logarithmically growing promastigotes reach stationary phase,
presumably reflecting a decreased requirement for membrane lipids in
the latter stage (our unpublished results). Growth-dependent changes in
GPI biosynthesis are also likely to account for the dramatic change in
surface architecture of these parasites after promastigotes
differentiate to amastigotes in the phagolysosome compartment of
mammalian macrophages. Amastigotes lack the surface coat of
GPI-anchored glycoproteins and LPG, but retain a densely packed surface
layer of free GPIs that appear to be the major surface components
(McConville and Blackwell, 1991
; Bahr et al., 1993
; Winter
et al., 1994
).
To further investigate the subcellular localization and
growth-dependent changes in GPI biosynthesis in these parasites, we have expressed a green fluorescent protein (GFP) chimera containing functionally active dolichol-phosphate-mannose synthase (DPMS) in
L. mexicana promastigotes (Ilgoutz et al.,
1999b
). DPMS is a C-terminally anchored membrane protein that catalyzes
the synthesis of dolichol-phosphate-mannose on the cytoplasmic leaflet
of the ER. This sugar donor is rapidly used by three GPI-specific
mannosyltransferases in the ER lumen (Ralton and McConville, 1998
;
Ilgoutz et al., 1999a
). Unexpectedly, the GFP-DPMS chimera
primarily localized to a previously undescribed tubular compartment,
rather than the bulk ER (Ilgoutz et al., 1999b
). This tubule
extended from the flagellar pocket (a specialized invagination in the
plasma membrane that surrounds the flagellum and the sole site of exo-
and endocytosis in these parasites) toward the posterior end of the
cell (Ilgoutz et al., 1999b
). We initially speculated that
this organelle could correspond to the ER subcompartment detected in
subcellular fractionation experiments. However, we now show that this
organelle, termed the multivesicular tubule (MVT) (Mullin et
al., 2000
; Weise et al., 2000
), is a terminal lysosomal
compartment. Our data suggest that GFP-DPMS is correctly targeted to
the same subcompartment of the ER as endogenous DPMS in logarithmically
growing promastigotes, but is also constitutively transported to the
MVT lysosome. In stationary phase promastigotes, essentially all of the
GFP-DPMS chimera is transported to the MVT, coincident with a marked
down-regulation in endogenous DPMS activity. These data suggest that
growth-dependent changes in the sorting and lysosomal turnover of ER
glycosyltransferases in L. mexicana may play a role in
regulating the synthesis of the major surface glycolipids of these parasites.
| |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Parasite Culture
Promastigotes of L. mexicana (strain MNYC/BZ/62/M379) were cultivated at 27°C in RPMI medium (Trace, Castle Hill, NSW, Australia) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (Life Technologies, Gaithersburg, MD).
DNA Constructs
Constructs encoding GFP, GFP-DPMS, and an ER signal
sequence-GFP-MDDL fusion protein in the Leishmania
expression vector pX (pGFP, pGFP-DPMS, and pGFP-MDDL, respectively)
were generated as previously described (Ilgoutz et al.,
1999b
). The following synthetic oligonucleotides (5' to 3') were used
to generate a construct that encodes DPMS N-terminally tagged with
three copies of the influenza hemagglutinin peptide epitope (pHA-DPMS).
Nucleotides in bold denote sequence that was not complementary to the
DNA template, but added to incorporate restriction endonucleases for cloning or to incorporate HA epitopes. The start codon is underlined and the stop codon is doubly underlined: primer 1, GACTGGATCCATGTACCCGTACGACGTCCGGACTACGCCATGC -AGTACTCCATTATCG, primer 2, GATCGAATTCTAGACCT-AGAAGAGGGAATGGTAGAG, primer 3, TATCCCTATGATGTGCCCGATTATGCGTACCCGTACGACGTCCCG, primer 4, GAC-TGGATCCATGTACCCGTACGACGTCCCGGACTACGCTGGCTATCCCTATGATGTGCCC. A single HA-tagged DPMS amplicon was generated by polymerase chain reaction, with the use of primers 1 and 2 and a leishmanial DPMS genomic clone (Ilgoutz et al., 1999a
) as template. This
amplicon was subsequently used as template for a second round of
polymerase chain reaction with the use of primers 3 and 2, resulting in
a double HA-tagged DPMS amplicon. A triple HA-tagged DPMS amplicon was
then generated with the use of the double HA-tagged DPMS amplicon as
template and primers 4 and 2. This amplicon was directionally cloned
into the pX vector with the use of the restriction endonucleases BamHI and XbaI. The N-terminal triple HA tag thus
encoded the following sequence: MYPYDVPDYAGYPYDVPDYAYPYDVPDYA fused in
frame with full-length DPMS. Plasmid DNA was prepared and parasites were transfected, as previously described (Ilgoutz et al.,
1999b
).
Fluorescence Microscopy
GFP chimeras were visualized in live L. mexicana
promastigotes by confocal microscopy, as described previously (Ilgoutz
et al., 1999b
). Briefly, promastigotes were pelleted by
centrifugation (5000 × g, 10 s) and then
resuspended in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) containing
concanavalin-A-TRITC (Sigma, St. Louis, MO) and 1% bovine serum
albumin to label the cell surface glycocalyx and flagellar pocket.
Endocytic and acidic compartments in live cells were also labeled by
adding either FM 4-64 (8 µm from a 4 mM stock in dimethyl sulfoxide
[DMSO]; Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR) or the acidotropic probe
Lysotracker (50 nm; Molecular Probes) directly to the culture medium.
Noninternalized FM 4-64 in the plasma membrane was back-extracted by
resuspending promastigotes in fresh medium. Live promastigotes were
immobilized for fluorescence microscopy by mounting under
poly-L-lysine-coated coverslips. Samples were viewed with a Bio-Rad MRC1024 confocal scanning laser system installed on a Zeiss Axioplan II microscope with a krypton/argon laser as previously described (Ilgoutz et al., 1999b
). Images of
512 × 512 pixels were obtained with the use of Bio-Rad Lasersharp
and processed with the use of Adobe Photoshop. For indirect
immunofluorescence microscopy, L. mexicana promastigotes
were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde (15 min, on ice), washed in PBS, and
then allowed to adhere to glass coverslips. The coverslips were
sequentially incubateded in methanol (
20°C, 5 min), 50 mM
NH4Cl, and PBS containing 1% bovine serum
albumin (PBS-BSA), and the adherent cells labeled with anti-HA
antibody, 3F10 (1:40 dilution; Roche Molecular Biochemicals, Indianapolis, IN) in PBS-BSA for 30 min at 25°C. Coverslips
were washed in PBS (3 times), before being immersed in Alexa-fluorTM 488 goat anti-rat IgG conjugate (1:200 dilution; Molecular Probes) in
PBS-BSA for 30 min at 25°C. For double labeling experiments, the
coverslips were washed with PBS (3 times) and then immersed in rabbit
anti-BiP antiserum (1:100 dilution; provided by Dr J. Bangs; University
of Wisconsin, Madison Medical School, Madison, WI) in PBS-BSA
for 30 min at 25°C. Coverslips were washed with PBS (3 times) and
then immersed in Texas Red goat anti-rabbit IgG conjugate (1:100
dilution; Jackson ImmunoResearch, West Grove, PA) in PBS-BSA (30 min,
25°C). After washing in PBS (3 times), coverslips were mounted with
Mowiol mounting medium for confocal microscopy as described above.
Electron Microscopy
For electron microscopy, cells were fixed by adding a mixture of glutaraldehyde (25% stock, 7.1% final concentration) and osmium tetroxide (10% stock, ProSciTech, Thuringowa, Queensland, Australia; 1.2-1.6% final concentration) directly to mid-log phase cultures. After fixation at room temperature for 15 min, cells were gently collected by centrifugation (1000 × g, 5 min) and washed three times with PBS. Cells were transferred to water in three steps, embedded in 1% agarose (DNA-grade; Progen, Darra, Queensland, Australia) and the agarose blocks dehydrated in a graded series of ethanol or acetone solutions (0-100% in 10% steps) on ice. Cells were embedded in LR Gold (ProSciTech) or Spurr's resin (after infiltration with propylene oxide), and ultrathin serial sections (80 nm) were mounted on pioloform-coated slot grids, poststained with aqueous uranyl acetate and lead citrate, and examined at 120 kV with the use of a Philips CM120 BioTWIN transmission electron microscope. For immunoelectron microscopy, cells were fixed with glutaraldehyde (7.1%) for 1 h on ice and then processed as described above for embedding in LR Gold. Ultrathin sections on slot grids were immersed in blocking buffer (PBS containing 0.8% bovine serum albumin and 0.01% Tween 80) for 30 min at room temperature and then incubated with a rabbit polyclonal anti-GFP antibody (1:300-1:500) in blocking buffer for 2-4 h at room temperature. After washing with blocking buffer, the sections were incubated with goat anti-rabbit antibodies (British BioCell International, Cardiff, United Kingdom) conjugated to 20-nm gold particles (1:20 dilution) for 16 h at 4°C. The sections were washed with blocking buffer, PBS, and water and poststained as described above.
Analysis of Endogenous and Tagged Forms of DPMS
For analysis of endogenous DPMS activity, promastigotes were
solublized in 50 mM HEPES-NaOH pH 7.5, 2 mM EGTA, 5 mM
MgCl2, 2.5 mM dithiothreitol (DTT), 1 mM ATP, 0.2 mM tosyl-lysylchloromethylketone (TLCK), 2 µM leupeptin, 0.1 mM
phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride (PMSF), and 0.4% Triton X-100 for 10 min
at 0°C. The total extract containing 106 cell
equivalents was diluted in 50 µl of the same buffer containing 75 µM dolichol-phosphate (C40-C65) and 0.3 mM
GDP-[3H]Man (0.3 µCi) and incubated for 40 min at 15°C (Ilgoutz et al., 1999b
). The reaction was
stopped by addition of 2 volumes of water-saturated 1-butanol and
radioactivity in the upper 1-butanol phase quantitated by scintillation
counting. Levels of expression of the GFP- and HA-tagged DPMS were
quantitated by Western blotting. Promastigotes were extracted in
chloroform/methanol/water and precipitated proteins analyzed by
SDS-PAGE. Protein was transferred to nitrocellulose and the blots
probed with anti-GFP (1:1000 dilution; Roche Molecular Biochemicals),
anti-HA (1:200 dilution; Roche Molecular Biochemicals), or
anti-T. brucei BiP (1:5000 dilution) (Bangs et
al., 1993
) antibodies. The blots were subsequently probed with
either anti-mouse or anti-rabbit antibody-horseradish peroxidase
conjugate (1:10,000; Bio-Rad, Richmond, CA), respectively, and bands
detected by enhanced chemiluminescence (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech,
Arlington Heights, IL) according to the manufacturer's instructions.
Subcellular Fractionation
Leishmania mexicana promastigotes were hypotonically
lyzed and microsomes in the 3000-g supernatant were fractionated by
isopycnic centrifugation on a 15-60% sucrose gradient (Ilgoutz
et al., 1999b
). BiP (a general ER marker) was detected by
SDS-PAGE and quantitative immunoblotting. DPMS (ER
subcompartment) was assayed as previously described (Ilgoutz et
al., 1999b
). Protease activity was measured with the use of
substrate SDS-PAGE (Brooks et al., 2000
). Briefly, fractions
from the sucrose gradient were preincubated in 50 mM sodium acetate
buffer, pH 5.5 (30 min, 27°C) and protein concentrated by solvent
precipitation. Samples were resuspended in reducing sample buffer
(without heating) and electrophoretically resolved under reducing
conditions in 12% (wt/vol) acrylamide gels incorporating 0.2%
(wt/vol) gelatin, run under reducing conditions. The gels were washed
sequentially with 0.25% (vol/vol) Triton X-100 and 0.1 M sodium
acetate buffer, pH 5.5, containing 1 mM DTT to reconstitute protease
activity and then incubated in 0.1 m sodium acetate, pH 5.5, 1 mM DTT
for 12 h at 25°C. The location of proteases was detected by
staining with 0.25% Coomassie Blue R-250 (Brooks et al.,
2000
).
Treatment with Lysosome-disrupting Compounds
L. mexicana promastigotes expressing the GFP-DPMS chimera were incubated in RPMI-10% fetal bovine serum at 27°C in the presence of either 250 nM bafilomycin A1, 20 µM monensin, or 80 µM imipramine. These compounds were made up as stock solutions in DMSO or ethanol and diluted to give a final concentration of 0.5% DMSO or ethanol. Control incubations were performed in the presence of the equivalent amounts of DMSO or ethanol.
Cell Surface Labeling and Transport of gp63
The surface transport of the major surface glycoprotein gp63 was
monitored by surface biotinylation. Mid-log growth promastigotes (6 × 106 cell/ml) were incubated in
conditioned medium containing either 250 nM bafilomycin
A1 or 0.3% DMSO for 1 h at 27°C. Cells
were washed and suspended at 2 × 108
cells/ml in methionine-free RPMI medium containing 1% bovine serum
albumin with or without bafilomycin A1 (20 min at
27°C) and then pulse-labeled for 5 min with
[35S] Trans-label (100 µCi/ml; ICN, Costa
Mesa, CA). The cells were centrifuged (3000 × g, 30 s) and suspended at 2 × 107 cell/ml in complete RPMI-10% fetal bovine
serum with or without 250 nM bafilomycin A1.
After a 2-h chase, cells were washed with ice-cold biotinylation buffer
(10 mM triethanolamine pH 8.5, 2 mM CaCl2, 0.25 M
sucrose, 10 mM glucose) and then resuspended in biotinylation buffer
containing 1.5 mg/ml NHS-SS-biotin (Sigma) for 30 min at 4°C. Cells
were washed with PBS, pH 8.5, containing 100 mM glycine and solubilized
in PBS containing 1% Triton X-114, 0.2 mM TLCK, 0.2 µM leupeptin,
and 0.1 mM PMSF. After recovery of GPI-anchored proteins by
temperature-induced phase separation (Bordier, 1981
), the
detergent-enriched phase was diluted to 1% Triton X-114 in PBS and
incubated with 30 µl of packed streptavidin-agarose beads (Sigma)
overnight at 4°C with gentle agitation. The beads were centrifuged
and the supernatant (unbound fraction) retained. The beads were
sequentially washed with 10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.4, containing 1) 0.5 M
NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, 1% NP-40; 2) 0.15 M NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, 1% NP-40, 0.1%
SDS; and 3) 0.1% NP-40 and then boiled in PBS containing 50 mM DTT,
0.2% SDS to release protein bound to the beads by the biotin disulfide
linker. Protein in the bound and unbound fractions were precipitated in
90% ice-cold acetone and analyzed by SDS-PAGE. Labeled proteins were
detected by fluorography in Amplify (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) and
bands quantitated by densitometry.
Proteolytic Degradation of GFP
L. mexicana promastigotes expressing the GFP-DPMS chimera were harvested at either log (8 × 106 cells/ml) or stationary (1.4 × 107 cells/ml) growth and incubated in conditioned RPMI-10% fetal bovine serum with or without protease inhibitors (10 µM E64d, or 0.1 mM PMSF and 10 mM DTT) for 30 min at 27°C. Cells were washed in PBS and suspended in either 50 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.5, 100 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA (pH 7.5 medium) or 50 mM acetate buffer pH 5.5, 100 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA (pH 5.5 medium), with or without protease inhibitors for 2 h at 27°C. Proteins were precipitated and analyzed by SDS-PAGE and immunoblotting with anti-GFP antibody as described above. In some experiments, cells were preincubated in RPMI medium containing 250 µM cycloheximide.
| |
RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Down-Regulation of DPMS and Degradation of Epitope-tagged Forms of DPMS in Log and Stationary Phase L. mexicana Promastigotes
We have recently shown that the rate of synthesis of free GPIs and
the GPI-anchored LPG decreases dramatically as logarithmically growing
L. mexicana promastigotes reach stationary growth (our unpublished results). To examine whether decreased GPI biosynthesis in
stationary phase cells is associated with the down-regulation of
specific GPI enzymes, the activity of DPMS, a key enzyme in GPI
biosynthesis, was measured in log, late log, and stationary phase
cultures. As shown in Figure 1A, the
cellular levels of DPMS activity decreased markedly as log phase
promastigotes reached stationary growth. Because posttranscriptional
and posttranslational mechanisms are thought to be important in
regulating the cellular levels of many proteins in these parasites, we
next investigated whether the low levels of DPMS activity in stationary
phase cultures were due to increased degradation of this enzyme. A
fusion construct of DPMS containing a triple HA epitope tag at the
amino terminus (HA-DPMS) was constitutively expressed from the pX
episome in L. mexicana promastigotes. This epitope-tagged
protein was readily detected in logarithmically growing promastigotes
(Figure 1B) and was localized to the nuclear envelope and peripheral ER
by indirect immunofluorescence (Figure
2A). Interestingly, the distribution of
the HA-DPMS overlapped with, but was not coincident with staining for
the endogenous luminal ER marker BiP (Figure 2, B and C), consistent
with our previous finding that the endogenous DPMS is present in a
subcompartment of the ER (Ilgoutz et al., 1999b
). In
contrast, the HA-DPMS protein could not be detected by either Western
blotting (Figure 1B) or indirect immunofluorescence (our unpublished
results) in stationary phase promastigotes. The down-regulation of this
protein was not due to decreased expression from the pX episome as
levels of another ER-localized GFP chimera, GFP-MDDL (containing an
N-terminal signal sequence and C-terminal ER retention signal [Bangs
et al., 1993
]) was expressed in the ER at similar levels in
both log and stationary phase promastigotes (Figure 2, H and I).
Moreover, the endogenous marker BiP was also expressed at similar
levels in log and stationary phase cells (Figure 1B), suggesting that
the degradation of HA-DPMS was not due to the general autophagic
degradation of the ER. These data show that HA-DPMS is primarily
expressed in the ER in log phase promastigotes and indicate that
constitutively expressed forms of DPMS are efficiently degraded in
stationary phase cells.
|
|
Degradation of GFP-DPMS Is Associated with Transport from ER to a Novel Tubular Organelle
We have previously shown that expression of a functionally active
GFP chimera of DPMS in L. mexicana promastigotes results in
the accumulation of GFP fluorescence in a novel tubular organelle rather than the ER (Ilgoutz et al., 1999b
). To investigate
whether this compartment is associated with the degradation of DPMS
chimeras we examined whether the GFP-DPMS chimera was also degraded in a growth-dependent manner and whether this degradation was associated with a change in the subcellular distribution of this chimera in live
cells. As shown in Figure 1C, the full-length GFP-DPMS chimera was
degraded as logarithmically growing promastigotes reached stationary
phase with essentially the same kinetics as the HA-DPMS (Figure 1B).
However, the degradation of the GFP-DPMS chimera was associated with
the appearance of a 25-kDa protein that accumulated during log growth
and was gradually degraded after disappearance of the full-length
chimera in stationary phase cells (Figure 1C). This protein was
recognized by the anti-GFP antibodies and was slightly smaller than the
native, cytosolic form of GFP (27 kDa). It was also quantitatively
released from sonicated cells and was fluorescent when analyzed by
native gel electrophoresis (our unpublished results), suggesting that
it corresponds to the soluble, protease resistant GFP moiety (pr-GFP) of the GFP-DPMS chimera.
The growth-dependent degradation of the GFP-DPMS chimera was associated
with a marked change in the subcellular distribution of GFP
fluorescence in live parasites. In early log phase cells, the majority
of the GFP fluorescence was localized to the ER, as shown by staining
of both the nuclear envelope and the cortical reticulum (Figure 2D).
However, in late log phase cells, GFP fluorescence was predominantly
associated with the previously described tubular organelle that
invariably extended from a region near the flagellar pocket toward the
posterior end of the promastigote (Figure 2E) (Ilgoutz et
al., 1999b
). This tubule characteristically fragmented into a
series of vesicles in stationary phase cells (Figure 2F). By day 4, when promastigotes had assumed the elongated cell shape of metacyclic
promastigotes, the GFP chimera was not detected by
immunoblotting (Figure 1C) and was restricted to a few
isolated vesicles when live parasites were examined by confocal
fluorescence microscopy (Figure 2G). In contrast, a soluble GFP-MDDL
chimera (Figure 2, H and I) and the endogenous BiP (our unpublished
results) could be readily detected in the ER in both log and stationary phase cells. These results indicate that the degradation of GFP-DPMS is
associated with the accumulation of GFP fluorescence in the tubule and
associated structures and provide the first line of evidence that this
compartment may be a degradative compartment.
GFP-DPMS and pr-GFP Are Present in Distinct Subcellular Compartments
To examine whether the GFP-DPMS chimera was being degraded in the
ER, a crude extract of L. mexicana promastigotes membranes was fractionated by isopycnic centrifugation on a 15-60% sucrose density gradient. As shown previously, the luminal ER marker BiP is
distributed across the gradient as two broad peaks (Figure 3A; Ilgoutz et al., 1999b
). In
contrast, DPMS (Figure 3A) and other GPI enzymes (Ilgoutz et
al., 1999b
) are associated with BiP-containing fractions near the
top of the gradient, which may represent a subcompartment of the ER
(Ilgoutz et al., 1999b
). The intact GFP-DPMS chimera
cosedimented with DPMS activity, suggesting that this chimera was being
correctly targeted within the ER (Figure 3A). In contrast, the pr-GFP
degradation product cosedimented with the major lysosomal markers near
the bottom (fractions 11-14) and at the top (fractions 1-3) of the
gradient (Figure 3A). The pr-GFP and cysteine proteases at the top of
the gradient (fractions 1-3) were not associated with sedimentable
membranes (our unpublished results), suggesting that they had
been released from an intracellular luminal compartment during cell
lysis. In support of this conclusion, GFP was never detected in the
cytosol by fluorescence microscopy (Figure 2, D and E), although both
pools of pr-GFP were fluorescent when analyzed on nonreducing
polyacrylamide gels (our unpublished results) or by immuno-EM
(Figure 4). These results suggest that the intact GFP-DPMS is correctly targeted to the same membranes as
endogenous DPMS and that the pr-GFP degradation product is present in a
distinct compartment, most likely the tubule, which contains lysosomal
proteases.
|
|
Interestingly, some of the GFP-DPMS overlapped with the pr-GFP-containing fractions, suggesting that this chimera may reach the tubule before being degraded. To examine whether other forms of DPMS are present in these fractions, we investigated the subcellular distribution of HA-DPMS in sucrose gradients. As expected, most of the HA-DPMS cosedimented with endogenous DPMS (Figure 3B, fractions 6-8). However, a minor but significant pool of HA-DPMS overlapped with the pr-GFP band near the bottom of the gradient (Figure 3B, fractions 12-14). Significantly, these fractions were not associated with a peak of DPMS activity, suggesting that this second pool of HA-DPMS is not functionally active. The distribution of HA-DPMS was also distinct from that of BiP (Figure 3A). Collectively, these data suggest that membrane-anchored forms of DPMS can be transported to the tubule before they are degraded.
Tubule Compartment Is a Multivesicular, post-Golgi Compartment
To further define the function of the tubule and its relationship to other organelles in the secretory pathway, wild-type and GFP-DPMS expressing L. mexicana promastigotes were fixed in mid-log phase and analyzed by electron microscopy (EM). When sections from fixed cells were stained with the anti-GFP antibody and gold-labeled secondary antibody, a prominent tubular organelle was labeled, which invariably extended from a region near the trans-face of the single anteriorly located Golgi apparatus, toward the posterior end of the cell (Figure 4, A and B). The tubular nature of this organelle was confirmed by serial sectioning (Figure 4, A-C). In all sections, the gold label over the tubule was primarily or exclusively found over the lumen, rather than in the limiting membrane of this organelle (Figure 4, A and B). Gold label was also associated with the nuclear envelope and other regions of the ER, as well as with the both the cis- and trans-face of the Golgi apparatus (Figure 4A and insert). Some label was also detected over a population of tubular-vesicular endosomes near the flagellar pocket (Figure 4C). In contrast, the mitochondrion and the large vacuolar acidocalcisomes at the posterior end of the promastigote were not labeled (Figure 4A).
To define more precisely the ultrastructure of the labeled organelles
and their relationship with other organelles at the anterior end of the
cell, promastigotes were fixed in
glutaraldehyde/OsO4. This fixation procedure
resulted in the preservation of a prominent MVT that extended from a
region proximal to the flagellar pocket to the extreme posterior end of
some cells (m in Figure 5, A-E, and H).
This organelle has a diameter of ~60-120 nm and contains many
membrane-bound ~30-nm intraluminal vesicles (Figure 5F). The MVT was
often closely associated with either one or two cytoplasmic microtubules that are clearly distinct from the subpellicular microtubules that underlie the plasma membrane (Figures 5, C and D, and
6A). These microtubules appear to become
intercalated into the subpellicular array at the posterior end of the
cell (Figure 5C). We were unable to confirm whether they are continuous
with the microtubule quartet that originates at the flagellar basal body and extends up the side of the flagellar pocket membrane (Figure
6D). In many cells, the MVT was only apparent as a series of discrete
multivesicular bodies (MVBs) or short tubules in single sections
(Figure 6, A-C). However, consecutive serial sections showed that
these bodies were usually part of a continuous structure that extended
from near the Golgi apparatus to the posterior end of the cell (our
unpublished results). It is thus likely that both the continuous and
discontinuous multivesicular structures seen in fixed cells are part of
the continuous tubular structure seen in live transfected cells
expressing the GFP-DPMS chimera (Figure 2E) or wild-type cells labeled
with the fluorescent lipid analog BODIPY-ceramide (Ilgoutz et
al., 1999b
). Interestingly, in some sections the MVT appeared to
be closely associated with extensions of the mitochondrion (Figure 5G),
as previously observed by fluorescence microscopy (Ilgoutz et
al., 1999b
).
|
|
In addition to the MVT, a distinct class of MVBs with the same internal
structure as the MVT was commonly present near the anterior end of the
MVT (v in Figure 5B) and proximal to the trans-face of the
Golgi apparatus (Figure 7, C-F). The
single, anteriorly located Golgi apparatus typically contained five or
six stacked cisternae, and could be readily orientated by the presence
of a prominent transitional ER (tER) along the cis
(posterior)-face of the stack in serial sections (Figure 7A and C-F).
The space between the tER (a cisternal extension of the cortical ER)
and the cis-face of the Golgi was typically full of
30-50-nm vesicles (Figure 7, C-F), suggesting that this is the
primary site of vesicular transport between the ER and the Golgi
apparatus. Similar vesicles were also found around the lateral margins
of the Golgi cisternae. In contrast, a number of morphologically
distinct vesicles were evident at the trans-face of the
Golgi stack, which appeared to be the equivalent of the TGN in other
eukaryotes. These included small 30-50-nm vesicles (similar to those
found in other parts of the Golgi apparatus), large translucent
vesicles or saccules (80-500 nm in width) of varying shape, and a
population of uniform ~230-nm-diameter MVBs, which were identical to
those seen near the anterior end of the MVT (Figure 5, D-F). Serial
sectioning revealed that several MVBs were associated with the
trans-cisternae of the Golgi complex (Figure 7, D-F). The
small vesicles and large polymorphic vesicles/saccules were often found
anterior to the Golgi apparatus, juxtaposed to the flagellar pocket
membrane. In contrast, the MVBs were never observed to lie directly
next to the flagellar pocket membrane (Figure 5, B and C). These MVBs may thus act as a separate compartment and/or transport intermediates between the Golgi apparatus and the MVT (Figure 5H). Collectively, these studies suggest that the MVBs and MVT are post-Golgi compartments and that they have the characteristic internal structure of late endosomes or lysosomes (Gruenberg and Maxfield, 1995
; Odorizzi et
al., 1998
).
|
Transport of Styryl Dye FM 4-64 into MVT
To determine whether the MVT represents an intermediate endosomal
or terminal lysosomal compartment L. mexicana promastigotes were stained with the nonexchangeable styryl dye FM 4-64, which is
commonly used as a nonselective marker of endocytic pathway (Vida and
Emr, 1995
). FM 4-64 was rapidly incorporated into the plasma membrane
and flagellar pocket (Figure 8A) and
subsequently internalized after 10-20 min into a network of membranes
surrounding the flagellar pocket at 27°C (Figure 8, C and D). These
membranes have a tubular-vesicular structure (our unpublished results)
and are the leishmanial equivalent of (early) endosomes (Wiese et al., 1996
, 2000
). FM 4-64 was subsequently transported to a
tubular structure with the same morphology as the MVT between 30 and
120 min (Figure 8E). When cells expressing the GFP-DPMS chimera were labeled with FM 4-64 for 2 h, the dye was found to colocalize exactly with GFP in the MVT (Figure 8, F-F"). Uptake of FM 4-64 was
completely inhibited at 4°C (Figure 8B), whereas transport from the
early endosomes to the MVT was selectively inhibited at 10°C (Figure
8, G-G"). Interestingly, the labeling of both the early endosomes and
the MVT was relatively stable even after long (12 h) chase periods (our
unpublished data), suggesting this dye may be continuously
cycling between these two membrane compartments.
|
In contrast, the MVT was not detectably labeled with the acidotropic
dye Lysotracker (Figure 8H), suggesting that it does not contain a
highly acidic lumen. However, Lysotracker strongly stained the large
vacuolar acidocalcisomes at the posterior end of the promastigotes
(Figures 4A, 7B, and 8H). These acidified vacuoles contain calcium and
polyphosphate stores and lack lysosomal hydrolases (Docampo and Moreno,
1999
). The acidocalcisomes characteristically contained a homogeneous,
electron dense lumen (even without uranyl and lead poststaining), which
in some cases was leached out during fixation (Figures 4A and 7B).
Significantly, FM 4-64 was never seen to accumulate in these organelles
consistent with the notion that they are not connected to the endosomes
or lysosomes by vesicular transport. Taken together, these results
suggest that the MVT is the terminal compartment in the endocytic
pathway and that it is weakly acidic compared with the acidocalcisomes.
MVT Structure Is Perturbed by Lysomorphotropic Agents
We next investigated whether these compartments were affected by alkalinizing agents known to perturb endosome/lysosome function. Incubation of L. mexicana promastigotes with 250 nM bafilomycin A1, a specific inhibitor of vacuolar-type H+-ATPases, resulted in the dramatic collapse of the MVT to one or two large vesicles within 30 s (Figure 8I). This collapse was extremely rapid, suggesting that the MVT is under elastic tension. In contrast, the structure of the ER stained with GFP-MDDL was unchanged by bafilomycin A1 treatment (our unpublished results). Essentially identical results were obtained when cells were incubated instead with either monensin, a Na+/H+ exchanger, or imipramine, a membrane-permeant amine (our unpublished results), suggesting that the maintenance of pH gradients across the MVT membrane or other intracellular pH gradients is required for MVT structure.
An Intact MVT Is Not Required for Anterograde Surface Transport of GPI-anchored Glycoproteins
To discount the possibility that the MVT may be part of the
secretory pathway, we investigated whether perturbation of MVT structure affected the secretory transport of the major surface glycoprotein gp63/leishmanolysin. Surface transport of gp63 was measured by pulse/chase labeling cells with
[35S]methionine and surface biotinylation. gp63
was transported to the cell surface with a lag of ~15 min and a
t1/2 of 50 min in untreated cells (our
unpublished results). Essentially identical surface transport
kinetics was observed when cells were preincubated in the presence of
bafilomycin A1 to induce the complete collapse of
MVT (Figure 9). An intact MVT is
therefore not required for the surface transport of the major
GPI-anchored glycoproteins, consistent with the notion that the MVT is
not part of the normal exocytic pathway.
|
MVT Contains Resident Lysosomal Cysteine Proteases That Degrade pr-GFP In Vivo and In Vitro
The subcellular fractionation studies suggested that the MVT
contained mature cysteine proteases, although the activity of these
proteases is insufficient to degrade the steady-state pool of pr-GFP.
To investigate whether the slow rate of degradation of this protein was
due to the relatively high pH of the MVT lumen, L. mexicana
promastigotes were incubated in media adjusted to pH 5.5 for 2 h,
conditions that are known to activate Leishmania cysteine
proteases in vitro (Sanderson et al., 2000
). Although no
detectable degradation of pr-GFP occurred when promastigotes were
incubated in pH 7.5 medium, degradation of pr-GFP was essentially complete after 2 h in pH 5.5 medium (Figure
10, compare lanes 1 and 4). In
contrast, the ER pool containing the intact GFP-DPMS chimera was not
degraded in either treatment (Figure 10). The degradation of pr-GFP at
pH 5.5 was partially inhibited if the promastigotes were pretreated
with E64d, a membrane-permeable inhibitor of the major lysosomal
cysteine proteases of Leishmania (Figure 10, lane 2).
Surprisingly, the serine protease inhibitor PMSF also retarded degradation of pr-GFP (Figure 10, lane 3). Similar results were obtained when cells were incubated in the presence of cycloheximide (our unpublished results), indicating that the enhanced degradation at
pH 5.5 did not reflect the inhibition of synthesis of new GFP-DPMS at
the low pH or the increased synthesis of cysteine proteases. These
results confirm the subcellular fractionation data showing that the MVT
contains lysosomal cysteine proteinases and reveal the presence of a
previously undescribed serine protease activity.
|
The lytic capacity of the MVT, as judged by the rate of degradation of
pr-GFP, was increased in stationary phase promastigotes (Figure 10,
lanes 7-12). However, the degradation of pr-GFP at pH 5.5 was
inhibited by E64d, but not by PMSF in these cells (Figure 10,
lanes7-9). These results are consistent with previous reports that the
proteolytic capacity of leishmanial lysosomes increases as
promastigotes reach stationary growth (Mottram et al., 1998
; Rosenthal 1999
), and further support the assignment of the MVT as a
lysosomal compartment.
| |
DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In this article we provide evidence that the ER glycosyltransferase DPMS is constitutively transported from a subcompartment of the ER to a novel tubular lysosome in L. mexicana promastigotes. Furthermore, we show that retention of GFP- and HA-tagged DPMS in the ER subcompartment is reduced as logarithmically growing L. mexicana promastigotes reach stationary growth, coincident with the down-regulation of DPMS activity in stationary phase cells. Soluble ER proteins are not transported to the lysosome or similarly degraded in stationary phase parasites, indicating that the degradation of DPMS is not the result of nonspecific turnover of ER membranes. Finally, we provide evidence that the elevated turnover of the DPMS chimeras in stationary phase promastigotes coincides with an increase in the lytic capacity of the MVT lysosome and changes in the morphology of this organelle. Collectively, these data suggest that growth-dependent changes in protein sorting to the lysosome may play an important role in regulating the cellular levels of DPMS and the biosynthesis of the major cell surface glycolipids of these parasites.
Our initial interest in the intracellular trafficking of DPMS arose
from the finding that the GFP-DPMS chimera accumulated in a previously
undescribed tubular compartment in L. mexicana promastigotes
(Ilgoutz et al., 1999b
). This organelle is not induced by
the overexpression of this protein because it is present in wild-type
parasites labeled with the vital lipid stain BODIPY-ceramide (Ilgoutz
et al., 1999b
) and the endocytic marker FM 4-64 (this study). The MVT can also be detected by EM in glutaraldehyde/osmium fixed (this study) and high-pressure frozen (Weise et al.,
2000
) wild-type L. mexicana promastigotes. We now show that
the MVT is a terminal lysosome compartment based on the following lines of evidence. First, the EM ultrastructural studies indicate that the
MVT is a post-Golgi compartment with the same internal structure as
late endosomes/lysosomes in other eukaryotic cells (Kobayashi et
al., 1998
; Odorizzi et al., 1998
). Second, the MVT is
labeled in a time- and temperature-dependent manner with the
well-defined endocytic marker FM 4-64. These studies clearly show that
the MVT is downstream of a network of tubulovesicular endosomes that surround the flagellar pocket. Transport between the endosomes and the
MVT is specifically inhibited at 10°C, as previously reported for
endosome-to-lysosome transport in the related parasite
Trypanosoma brucei (Brickman et al., 1995
). FM
4-64 was not chased into other compartments, indicating that the MVT is
the terminal compartment in the endosome/lysosomal pathway. The FM 4-64 studies also demonstrate that the MVT is distinct from the
acidocalcisomes, a second class of acidified vacuoles in the parasites
that contain the major cellular stores of Ca2+
and polyphosphates (Docampo and Moreno, 1999
). In contrast to the MVT,
the acidocalcisomes were not labeled with FM 4-64. Third, with the use
of subcellular fractionation we show that the MVT contains lysosomal
cysteine proteases (Mottram et al., 1998
; Rosenthal, 1999
).
The activity of these proteinases is greatly enhanced if promastigotes
are incubated in low pH medium, suggesting that the lytic capacity of
the MVT may be regulated by changes in the luminal pH. The MVT of log
phase promastigotes also appears to contain a previously
uncharacterized serine protease activity. It is not known whether the
serine protease activity occurs in stationary phase cells as the
activities of the cysteine proteases are highly up-regulated in this
stage and are likely to mask other protease activities in these in vivo
experiments. Fourth, the structure of the MVT is perturbed by a variety
of lysomorphotropic compounds, including bafilomycin
A1, monensin, and imipramine, which have been
shown to affect lysosome function in other eukaryotes. Fifth,
perturbation of the MVT does not alter the secretory transport of the
metalloproteinase gp63, indicating that it is not part of the exocytic
pathway used by the major surface GPI-anchored glycoproteins. These
data are in agreement with a recent study of Overath and colleagues
(Weise et al., 2000
) who concluded that the MVT is a
post-Golgi compartment based on their EM ultrastructural analyses and
the finding that the MVT contains complex phosphoglycans that are
assembled in the Golgi apparatus.
Although the MVT appears to be the terminal compartment in the
endocytic pathway of log phase promastigotes it has the characteristics of an immature lysosome. These include a low lytic capacity (as indicated by the accumulation of the pr-GFP and the abundant
intraluminal vesicles) and a relatively high luminal pH (as indicated
by the lack of staining with Lysotracker and the finding that exposure of parasites to low pH buffer greatly enhanced the degradation of the
MVT localized pr-GFP). In contrast, the pr-GFP is rapidly degraded in
stationary phase promastigotes, suggesting that the degradative
capacity of this compartment increases dramatically in this stage. The
mechanism(s) that underlie this maturation process have not been
defined but may involve the increased synthesis of cysteine proteases
(Mottram et al., 1998
; Rosenthal, 1999
) as well as the
acidification of the MVT lumen. The finding that the lytic capacity of
the MVT is increased when the extracellular medium is acidified may be
physiologically significant because Leishmania promastigotes
are exposed to low pH when they invade mammalian macrophages and are
internalized into the mature phagolysosomal compartment of the host
cell. Low pH is thought to be one of the triggers for
promastigote-to-amastigote differentiation, a process that involves the
dramatic remodeling of secretory and endocytic organelles (Pimenta
et al., 1991
). The rapid activation of parasite lysosomal
hydrolases in response to low extracellular pH could be an important
factor in initiating this remodeling process.
The MVT is closely associated with one or two specialized cytoplasmic
microtubules that may facilitate the formation of this unusual
organelle and the striking contraction and growth of the MVT during the
cell cycle (Ilgoutz et al., 1999b
). These microtubules also
appear to be invariably associated with the Golgi apparatus at the
anterior end of the cell and become intercalated with the subpellicular
array of microtubules that underlies the plasma membrane at the
posterior end of the cell (cf. Weise et al., 2000
). Because
microtubule-disrupting agents (Ilgoutz et al., 1999b
), as
well as several lysomorphotropic compounds used in this study caused
the MVT to collapse rapidly to a single large vesicle, we propose that
the MVT is under elastic tension and that these microtubules may be
involved in stabilizing this structure. They may also be involved in
directing the transport of the MVBs to the anterior end of the MVT. At
present it is not known whether these microtubules are continuous with
the microtubule quartet that emerges from the flagellar basal body
(Figure 6D; Gull, 1999
) or to other microtubules that may originate at
the anterior end of the parasite (Weise et al., 2000
). In
this respect, similar MVB- and MVT-like structures have been previously
observed in Crithidia fasciculata and were proposed to
associate with one (or two) microtubules in the flagellar pocket
microtubule quartet that folded back into the cytoplasm before reaching
the opening of the flagellar pocket (Brooker, 1971
).
Our immuno-EM studies suggest that the GFP-DPMS chimera is transported
to the MVT via the Golgi apparatus. Significantly, they also show that
the GFP moiety is delivered to the lumen of the MVT consistent with the
finding that this protein is rapidly degraded when promastigotes are
incubated in low pH medium. In yeast and animal cells, many membrane
proteins are targeted to the vacuole/lysosome lumen via the recently
described MVB pathway (Hirst et al., 1998
; Kobayashi
et al., 1998
; Odorizzi et al., 1998
;). In
this pathway, membrane proteins destined for lysosomal degradation are
transported from either the Golgi apparatus or the plasma membrane to
the limiting membrane of late endosomes and subsequently incorporated
into microinvaginating vesicles that are released into the luminal
compartment. After fusion of these MVBs with the vacuole/lysosome, the
internal vesicles are delivered into the lysosome/vacuole lumen and
degraded by luminal hydrolases (Odorizzi et al., 1998
). The
presence of a similar pathway in L. mexicana promastigotes
is strongly indicated by the presence of well-developed MVBs opposite
the trans-Golgi apparatus (Figures 5 and 7). Whereas the
location of the MVBs suggests that they arise from the Golgi apparatus,
proteins and lipids could also be delivered to the MVBs via the
endocytic pathway. Indeed, morphologically similar MVBs in C. fasciculata can be labeled with endocytic markers (Brooker, 1971
)
and several trypanosomatid lysosomal proteins are thought to be
delivered to lysosomes via the endocytic pathway (Kelley et
al., 1995
; Brooks et al., 2000
). Consistent with this
possibility, some of the GFP chimera was localized to endosome
membranes near the flagellar pocket (Figure 4). These observations
suggest that the cytoplasmically orientated GFP-DPMS chimera may be
transported from the ER to the Golgi apparatus and then delivered to
the MVT lysosome via the MVB pathway from either the Golgi or endocytic
pathway. It remains to be determined at what point in this pathway the
GFP-DPMS chimera is initially cleaved. Because GFP fluorescence is
never detected in the cytosol and cytosolic forms of GFP are not
transported into the MVT (our unpublished data), it is unlikely
that GFP-DPMS is cleaved before it has been internalized into the MVBs.
Furthermore, a small steady-state pool of HA-DPMS was reproducibly
detected in the dense MVT fractions (Figure 3B), suggesting that some
of the membrane-bound DPMS reaches the MVT before it is degraded. It is
also unknown how the size of the ER pool of DPMS is regulated during
growth. Given that GFP-DPMS appears to be constitutively transported to
the MVT in both log and stationary phase promastigotes the observed
decrease in the size of the ER pool in stationary phase promastigotes
could reflect a decrease in the capacity of ER retention and/or post-ER retrieval mechanism(s) in this stage.
Previous studies on the function of lysosomes in trypanosomatid
parasites have focused on their role in nutrition and the degradation
of surface-bound antibodies or other proteins involved in the host
immune response (Overath et al., 1997
). The results of this
study indicate that lysosomal degradation may have an important role in
regulating the activity of some enzymes in the early secretory pathway
of L. mexicana. The GFP-chimera proved to be useful for
monitoring this process because the GFP moiety is remarkably stable and
remains fluorescent after delivery to the MVT. These results are also
of general interest because comparatively little is known about the
role of lysosomal degradation in regulating the cellular levels of ER
membrane proteins. In contrast, there is good evidence that the
activities of several ER membrane proteins can be regulated by
ubiquitination and the 26S proteasome system (Bonifacino and Weissman,
1998
) or by endogenous ER proteases (Heinemann and Ozols, 1998
).
It will be of interest to determine whether these ER degradative
pathways are also involved in regulating GPI biosynthetic enzymes in
Leishmania spp.
| |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
We thank Dr. Ross Waller (University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia) for generating the HA-tagged DPMS and for reading the manuscript, Dr. J.D. Bangs (University of Madison, Madison Medical School, Madison, WI) for providing the anti-BiP antibody, and Dr. J. Mottram (University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom) for the anticysteine proteinase antibodies, and Professor Peter Overath (Max Planck Institute of Biology, Turbingen, Germany) for communicating results prior to publication. This work was supported by the Australian National Health and Medical Research Council and the Australian Research Council. M.J.M. is an Australian National Health and Medical Research Council Principal Research Fellow and Howard Hughes International Scholar. G.I.M. is a Howard Hughes International Scholar.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
These authors contributed equally to this work.
§ Corresponding author. E-mail address: malcolmm{at}unimelb.edu.au.
| |
ABBREVIATIONS |
|---|
Abbreviations used: DPMS, dolichol-phosphate-mannose synthase; GPI, glycosylphosphatidylinositol; GFP, green fluorescent protein; LPG, lipophosphoglycan; MVB, multivesicular bodies; MVT, multivesicular tubule, PMSF, phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride; TLCK, tosyl-lysylchloromethylketone.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|