|
|
|
|
Vol. 12, Issue 9, 2790-2799, September 2001


and
§
*The G. W. Hooper Foundation, Department of Microbiology and
Immunology and Departments of §Biopharmaceutical Sciences
and
Pharmaceutical Chemistry, University of California,
San Francisco, California 94143-0552; and
Department of
Biochemistry, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York,
New York 10021
| |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Clathrin-coated vesicles execute receptor-mediated endocytosis at the plasma membrane. However, a role for clathrin in later endocytic trafficking processes, such as receptor sorting and recycling or maintaining the organization of the endocytic pathway, has not been thoroughly characterized. The existence of clathrin-coated buds on endosomes suggests that clathrin might mediate later endocytic trafficking events. To investigate the function of clathrin-coated buds on endosomal membranes, endosome function and distribution were analyzed in a HeLa cell line that expresses the dominant-negative clathrin inhibitor Hub in an inducible manner. As expected, Hub expression reduced receptor-mediated endocytosis at the plasma membrane. Hub expression also induced a perinuclear aggregation of early endosome antigen 1-positive early endosomes, such that sorting and recycling endosomes were found tightly concentrated in the perinuclear region. Despite the dramatic redistribution of endosomes, Hub expression did not affect the overall kinetics of receptor sorting or recycling. These data show that clathrin function is necessary to maintain proper cellular distribution of early endosomes but does not play a prominent role in sorting and recycling events. Thus, clathrin's role on endosomal membranes is to influence organelle localization and is distinct from its role in trafficking pathways at the plasma membrane and trans-Golgi network.
| |
INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Clathrin-coated vesicles (CCV) mediate the selective transport of
integral membrane proteins between some cellular membranes (Kirchhausen, 2000
). At the plasma membrane, CCV facilitate
receptor-mediated endocytosis (RME), whereby cell surface receptors and
their ligands are internalized and delivered to the endocytic pathway
(Schwartz, 1995
). After RME, the fates of internalized receptors and
ligands vary (reviewed by Mukherjee et al., 1997
). Some
progress to the late endocytic pathway where they are degraded in
lysosomes (Carpenter and Cohen, 1976
; Fox and Das, 1979
). Others, such
as transferrin (Tf) and low density lipoprotein (LDL) receptors, are
sorted to a recycling compartment (Dunn et al., 1989
; Mayor
et al., 1993
), from which they return to the plasma membrane
(Anderson et al., 1982
; Hopkins and Trowbridge, 1983
).
Although it is known that these receptors are endocytosed via CCV
(Anderson et al., 1977
; Willingham et al., 1979
;
Bleil and Bretscher, 1982
), the degree to which clathrin mediates
subsequent sorting and recycling of the proteins has been a subject of debate.
The early endocytic pathway is composed of both sorting and recycling
endosomes (Ghosh et al., 1994
). Sorting endosomes separate endocytosed material that is to be recycled from material destined for
the lysosome. Recycling components proceed to recycling endosomes from
which they return to the plasma membrane. Clathrin-coated buds have
been observed on early endosomes (Stoorvogel et al., 1996
),
making it a logical hypothesis that clathrin might mediate receptor
sorting in the recycling pathway. A compelling finding in support of a
clathrin-dependent sorting/recycling pathway is that endosomal
clathrin-coated buds are enriched for Tf and Tf receptor (TfR; Killisch
et al., 1992
; Whitney et al., 1995
; Stoorvogel et al., 1996
). However, not all studies have supported the
hypothesis that clathrin is involved in these trafficking events. Under
conditions that inhibit clathrin-mediated endocytosis of TfR, recycling
occurs normally (Jing et al., 1990
; McGraw and Maxfield,
1990
; Damke et al., 1994
). Kinetic studies comparing the
trafficking of TfR to the flow of fluorescent lipid analogues concluded
that recycling occurs as part of a bulk flow process (Mayor et
al., 1993
). These results leave open the question as to what
function endosomal clathrin-coated buds serve if they do not
participate in receptor sorting or recycling. A finding that might
provide a clue to the function of clathrin-coated buds on endosomes is
that in polarized Madin-Darby canine kidney (MDCK) cells endosomal
clathrin-coated buds were found to mediate polarized recycling of TfR
to the basolateral membrane (Odorizzi et al., 1996
; Futter
et al., 1998
). Disruption of these coated buds did not
affect the kinetics of recycling but abolished polarized targeting to
the basolateral surface, suggesting a morphological role for clathrin
in maintaining the directionality of recycling.
We wanted to further investigate the role of clathrin-coated buds on
endosomes by studying endosomal function and distribution in cells
expressing the dominant-negative clathrin inhibitor Hub. Hub comprises
the C-terminal third of the clathrin heavy chain (Liu et
al., 1995
) and has been shown to act as a dominant-negative clathrin inhibitor by competing for light chain binding (Liu et al., 1998
). Previously, Hub has been used to demonstrate
clathrin's involvement in sorting at the trans-Golgi network (Liu
et al., 1998
), in endocytosis of HIV Nef-CD8 chimeras and
protease-activated receptor-1 (Lu et al., 1998
; Trejo
et al., 2000
), and in ARF-6-mediated apical internalization
in MDCK cells (Altschuler et al., 1999
). In the present
study, HeLa-T7Hub cells, in which Hub expression is inducible, were
used to study the effect of clathrin inhibition on endosomal
trafficking processes. A novel effect of clathrin inhibition, the
collapse of early endosome antigen 1 (EEA1)-positive early endosomes
into the perinuclear region, was observed and was reproduced in Chinese
hamster ovary (CHO) cells that were transiently transfected with Hub.
In Hub-expressing HeLa cells both sorting and recycling endosomes were
found in a tight distribution near the nucleus. Despite this dramatic
redistribution of endosomes, we did not observe a significant effect of
clathrin inhibition on the overall kinetics of receptor sorting or
recycling in these cells. Whereas RME of Tf and LDL was
dramatically reduced by the expression of Hub, sorting of LDL from Tf
and recycling of Tf occurred normally. These results identify a novel
function of clathrin in maintaining the cellular distribution of early
endosomes and show that the effect of clathrin inhibition on the
kinetics of receptor sorting and recycling is minimal.
| |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Cells, Antibodies, and Fluorescent Reagents
HeLa-T7Hub cells are permanently transfected with Hub under
control of the tetracycline operator sequence such that Hub expression can be induced by doxycycline treatment (Bennett and Brodsky, unpublished results). HeLa cells transfected with an empty vector (lacking the Hub insert) were created as a control. HeLa-T7Hub and
control cells were grown in DMEM containing 10% Tet System-approved fetal bovine serum (Clontech, Palo Alto, CA), 0.2 mg/ml G418 (Life Technologies-BRL, Rockville, MD), and 0.4 mg/ml hygromycin (Roche Molecular Biochemicals, Indianapolis, IN). CHO cells were transiently transfected with pCDM8-T7Hub vector, as previously described (Liu et al., 1998
). mAb H68.4 (against human TfR) was purchased
from Zymed (South San Francisco, CA) and rabbit anti-EEA1 antiserum was
a gift from Harald Stenmark (The Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo,
Sweden). Rhodamine Red X- and fluorescein isothiocyanate-conjugated donkey anti-mouse and fluorescein isothiocyanate-conjugated donkey anti-rabbit secondary antibodies were from Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories (West Grove, PA). Human Tf (Sigma, St. Louis, MO) was iron
loaded, purified by Sephacryl S-300 (Pharmacia LKB, Uppsala, Sweden)
gel-filtration chromatography, and conjugated to Alexa488 according to
the manufacturer's instruction (Molecular Probes, Eugene OR). For some
experiments Alexa488-Tf was purchased directly from Molecular Probes.
6-{(N-[7-nitrobenz-2-oxa-1,3-diazol-4-yl]amino)-hexanoyl}sphingosyl phosphocholine (C6-NBD-SM) was from Molecular
Probes. 3,3'-Dioctadecylindocarbocyanine (DiI)-labeled LDL was a gift
from Ira Tabas (Columbia University, New York).
Indirect Immunofluorescence
Cells grown on coverslips and treated with 2 µg/ml doxycycline for 48 h were fixed for 20 min in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) containing 4% formaldehyde. Cells were permeabilized in 0.04% saponin for 15 min and then blocked in PBS containing 1% cold fish gelatin, 0.1% bovine serum albumin, 0.02% SDS, 0.1% Nonidet P-40, and 0.02% azide for at least 1 h. Cells were incubated with appropriate antibodies in blocking buffer for at least 1 h, followed by incubation with fluorescent-labeled secondary antibodies for at least 1 hour. Cells were washed with PBS containing 0.008% saponin and 10% blocking buffer after each incubation. Coverslips were mounted onto glass slides with Vectashield (Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA).
Fluorescent Labeling of Cells
Cells were grown on coverslips affixed beneath holes in the
bottom of 35-mm Petri dishes and treated with 2 µg/ml doxycycline for
48 h. To study steady-state Tf distribution, cells were incubated at 37°C in serum-free DMEM containing 20 mM HEPES and 5 µg/ml Alexa488-Tf for 60 min followed by fixation. To study Tf and LDL trafficking, cells were pulse labeled at 37°C in serum-free
DMEM/HEPES containing 5 µg/ml Alexa488-Tf and/or 5 µg/ml DiI-LDL
for 3-5 min. Cells were washed with ice-cold M2 buffer (150 mM NaCl, 5 mM KCl, 1 mM CaCl2, 1 mM
MgCl2, 50 mM HEPES, pH 7.4) and incubated in
chase medium (DMEM containing 0.1 mg/ml unlabeled Tf and 0.1 mM
deferoxamine mesylate [Sigma]) for various lengths of time followed
by fixation. For some experiments residual Tf and LDL were stripped
from the cell surface before incubation in chase medium. To remove
surface Tf and LDL cells were incubated in ice-cold pH 4.6 citrate
buffer (25.5 mM citric acid, 24.5 mM sodium citrate) with 280 mM
sucrose and 0.01 mM deferoxamine mesylate. Cells were washed once
quickly with citrate buffer, followed by two 2-min incubations. Cells
were then washed multiple times in ice-cold M2 buffer containing 0.01 mM deferoxamine mesylate (Ghosh et al., 1994
). Lipid
labeling was accomplished by incubating cells at 37°C in M2 buffer
containing 5 µM C6-NBD-SM and 0.2% glucose for 3 min, followed by washing with ice-cold M2 buffer. Cell surface C6-NBD-SM was removed with six 10-min washes in
ice-cold PBS containing 5% fatty acid-free bovine serum albumin
(Sigma; Mayor et al., 1993
).
Widefield and Confocal Microscopy
Indirect immunofluorescence samples mounted on glass slides were viewed with an Axiophot fluorescence microscope (Carl Zeiss, Thronwood, NY). For coverslip-bottomed dishes, widefield fluorescence microscopy was performed on a DMIRB inverted microscope (Leica, Deerfield, IL). Confocal images were collected on an LSM510 laser scanning confocal unit (Zeiss) attached to an Axiovert 100M inverted microscope (Zeiss). Excitation on the LSM510 laser was with a 25-mW argon laser emitting 488 nm and a 1.0-mW helium/neon laser emitting at 543 nm. Emissions were collected with the use of a 505- to 530-nm band pass filter to collect Alexa488 and a 585-nm-long pass filter to collect DiI emission. For confocal images, reduced excitation light was applied for control of photobleaching. Cross-talk of the fluorophores into the wrong detectors was negligible.
125I-Tf Internalization and Recycling
Cells were grown in 12-well plates and treated with 2 µg/ml
doxycycline for 48 h. Cells were serum starved in serum-free DMEM containing 20 mM HEPES for 60 min at 37°C. To study a single round of
125I-Tf endocytosis and recycling, cells were
incubated on ice in 500 µL of serum-free DMEM/HEPES containing 0.2 µCi/ml 125I-Tf (NEN, Boston, MA) for 1 h,
washed with ice-cold medium, and then incubated at 37°C for various
lengths of time. At each time point cells were washed twice with 500 µL of ice-cold PBS. The medium and both PBS washes were combined in
the "released" fraction. Surface 125I-Tf was
removed by acid stripping at room temperature in 50 mM MES, pH 5, 0.15 M NaCl, 280 mM sucrose (Dunn et al., 1989
). Cells were
incubated in 500 µL of stripping buffer for 1 min, followed by 500 µL of fresh buffer for an additional 3 min. Cells were then washed
three times with PBS. Both acid washes and all three PBS washes were
combined in the "surface-bound" fraction. Cells were lysed in 1 ml
of 1% Triton X-100, 0.1 M NaOH (the "internal" fraction). The
amount of radioactivity in each fraction was determined with the use of
a CliniGamma gamma counter (Wallac, Gaithersburg, MD). The percentage
of radioactivity in each fraction was calculated as the number of
counts in that fraction divided by the total number of counts
recovered. To study 125I-Tf recycling after
continuous uptake, cells were grown and serum starved as described
above and then incubated at 37°C in 500 µL of serum-free DMEM/HEPES
containing 0.2 µCi/ml 125I-Tf for 30 or 60 min.
After acid stripping, 500 µL of DMEM/HEPES containing 0.5 mg/ml
unlabeled Tf (Calbiochem, La Jolla, CA) were added to each well, and
cells were incubated at 37°C for various lengths of time. At each
time point released and internal fractions were collected, and the
percentage of radioactivity in each fraction was determined as
described above.
| |
RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Hub Induces Perinuclear Aggregation of Early Endosomes
To determine the role of clathrin-coated buds on endosomes, the
effect of Hub expression on the early endosomal compartment was
characterized in HeLa-T7Hub cells that were treated with doxycycline. In these cells, drug treatment induces Hub expression from a stably transfected episomal vector encoding Hub under the control of the
tetracycline promoter. Hub has an inhibitory effect on RME, substantially reducing the rate and amount of Tf internalized by
Hub-expressing cells (Liu et al., 1998
; see below). However, there is a low level of residual endocytosis in Hub-expressing cells,
which makes it possible to accumulate ligand in these cells over time
to study the effect of Hub expression on post-RME-trafficking events.
When uptake of Alexa488-Tf was used to label sorting and recycling
endosomes in induced HeLa-T7Hub cells, a striking alteration in the
distribution of Tf-containing vesicles was observed relative to their
localization in control-transfected HeLa cells. After a 60-min
incubation, Tf-containing vesicles in control cells were dispersed
throughout the cytosol (Figure 1A).
However, in HeLa-T7Hub cells, which had been induced to express Hub for
48 h before Tf uptake, intracellular vesicles were concentrated in
the perinuclear area, with hardly any vesicles in the periphery (Figure
1B). The perinuclear aggregate did not represent clustered Tf trapped
on the cell surface, because an acid strip of the cell surface failed to eliminate it (Bennett and Brodsky, unpublished results) and Tf that
was trapped on the cell surface appeared to rim the cells uniformly
(Figure 1B). When Hub-expressing cells were stained with an anti-TfR
antibody, the staining pattern was identical to the pattern of
Alexa488-Tf localization, indicating that the receptor and its ligand
were both present in the perinuclear aggregate or trapped on the cell
surface (Figure 1D). After a 3-min incubation and a 5-min chase,
DiI-LDL was also heavily concentrated in the center of induced
HeLa-T7Hub cells (Figure 1F), whereas LDL-containing endosomes in
control cells were dispersed throughout the cytosol (Figure 1E).
C6-NBD-sphingomyelin is a fluorescent lipid
analogue that labels sorting endosomes and recycling endosomes (Mayor
et al., 1993
), and the distribution of these lipid-labeled
endosomes was also highly condensed in induced HeLa-T7Hub cells (Figure 1, G and H), indicating that the redistributed endosomes are part of
the normal endocytic/recycling pathway not specific to the Tf or LDL
markers used. Both Tf and LDL arrived in the perinuclear accumulation
of endosomes rapidly after endocytosis. As shown below, the LDL
and Tf concentrated near the nucleus did sort from one another (Figures
4 and 5). Therefore, we conclude that the perinuclear vesicles in
HeLa-T7Hub cells represent both sorting and recycling early endosomes.
These data demonstrate that clathrin inhibition can lead to a
redistribution of endosomes and endosomal clathrin-coated buds play a
role in mediating the intracellular distribution of early endosomes.
|
Hub Inhibits TfR Endocytosis with Little Impact on Receptor Recycling
In light of the redistribution of endosomes in induced HeLa-T7Hub
cells, it was of interest to investigate whether Hub expression has any
effect on the sorting and recycling functions of the early endosomal
compartment. First, the effect of Hub expression on receptor recycling
was analyzed with 125I-Tf to monitor the flow of
material through the endocytic/recycling pathway. Tf remains bound to
its receptor throughout endocytosis and recycling, making it a useful
marker for monitoring the trafficking of TfR (Octave et al.,
1981
; Bleil and Bretscher, 1982
). As expected, a Hub-induced reduction
of Tf internalization was observed. Whereas control cells showed a
rapid internalization of 125I-Tf (Figure
2B, open triangles) accompanied by a
disappearance of 125I-Tf from the cell surface
(Figure 2A, open squares) within 5 min, there was an obvious delay in
the internalization of 125I-Tf in HeLa-T7Hub
cells that had been induced to express Hub for 48 h before
125I-Tf exposure (Figure 2B, closed triangles).
This delay was mirrored by a prolonged lifespan of
125I-Tf on the cell surface (Figure 2A, closed
squares). By 10 min control cells began to recycle
125I-Tf to the cell medium (Figure 2B, open
circles), whereas there was not much detectable recycling in induced
HeLa-T7Hub cells even after 20 min (Figure 2B, closed circles).
|
One explanation for the delay in Tf recycling in HeLa-T7Hub cells is that clathrin is directly involved in recycling of TfR and its ligand. However, a second possibility is that the delay in recycling is simply due to the initial delay in Tf internalization. Substantial recycling was not observed in control cells until ~80% of the Tf was endocytosed from the cell surface. This level of Tf internalization was never reached in induced HeLa-T7Hub cells, and therefore the observed delay in recycling might indicate that Tf simply never progressed far enough along its intracellular route to recycle. To distinguish between these two possibilities, cells were incubated with 125I-Tf for 30 min at 37°C to saturate the entire endocytic/recycling pathway before measuring recycling. Figure 2C shows the kinetics of Tf recycling in HeLa-T7Hub and control cells after 30 min of continuous 125I-Tf uptake. A slight delay was observed in 125I-Tf recycling in induced HeLa-T7Hub cells (closed symbols). Although the delay was not extreme, it was consistent and reproducible. Interestingly, however, the delay in recycling became even less dramatic when cells were allowed to internalize 125I-Tf for 60 min before measuring recycling (Figure 2D). Thus the longer cells were allowed to internalize 125I-Tf, the less of an effect Hub had on Tf recycling. These data indicate that, once the recycling endosome is loaded with Tf, recycling can occur with little interference from Hub, implying that the farther along its intracellular pathway Tf progresses, the less of a role clathrin plays in directing its trafficking. Furthermore, the effect of Hub on 125I-Tf recycling seen in Figure 2, C and D, was not nearly as striking as the effect on Tf endocytosis seen in Figure 2, A and B. These results indicate that, whereas clathrin directly mediates RME at the plasma membrane, its role in receptor recycling is less prominent.
These findings are further supported by immunofluorescence
pulse-chase experiments. HeLa-T7Hub and control cells were pulsed with
Alexa488-Tf and then chased for various times. Again, a delay in Tf
internalization was observed in induced HeLa-T7Hub cells (Figure
3, E vs. A), with Tf rimming the cell
surface longer in Hub-expressing cells (Figure 3, G vs. 3 C). However,
despite the inhibition of Tf endocytosis, by 30 min of chase the
majority of labeled Tf recycled from both control and HeLa-T7Hub cells (Figure 3, D and H). This result is striking because previous work had
shown that recycling through the endocytic recycling compartment is, in
fact, a slower process than endocytosis (Bleil and Bretscher, 1982
;
Hopkins and Trowbridge, 1983
; Presley et al., 1993
). That
recycling from HeLa-T7Hub cells can nearly catch up to control cells
despite the initial inhibition of Tf internalization further indicates
that, although inhibition of clathrin affects the kinetics of early
endocytic steps of TfR trafficking, it does not substantially affect
later recycling events.
|
To confirm that trafficking of Tf accurately represents that of TfR, we followed the endocytosis and recycling of TfR directly with the use of a disulfide-linked biotin reagent to label cell surface proteins and then monitored the amount of glutathione-sensitive TfR. The results correlated with those shown in Figure 2. The kinetics of TfR recycling to the cell surface in induced HeLa-T7Hub cells were the same as in control cells (Bennett and Brodsky, unpublished results). Thus, the effect of Hub expression on Tf trafficking accurately represents the effect on trafficking of TfR.
Perinuclear Congregation of Early Endosomes Does Not Inhibit Sorting of Tf from LDL
The Hub-induced reorganization of early endosomes was then
investigated for its effect on endosomal sorting processes. In contrast
to Tf, LDL dissociates from its receptor in the sorting endosome and
progresses to the lysosome (Davis et al., 1987
). Because Tf
and LDL are both internalized via RME to sorting endosomes and then
separate from one another, these two ligands can be used simultaneously
as markers to monitor receptor endocytosis, sorting, and recycling.
Induced HeLa-T7Hub and control cells were given a short pulse with
Alexa488-Tf (Figure 4, shown in green)
and DiI-LDL (shown in red) and chased for various times to determine whether the two ligands colocalized to the same vesicles (indicated by
yellow) or whether they had properly sorted from one another. In
control cells some sorting occurred by 5 min of chase (Figure 4B), and
by 10 min almost all Tf and LDL were sorted to distinctly separate
vesicles (Fig. 4C). As expected, there was an inhibition of
internalization of Tf and LDL in induced HeLa-T7Hub cells (Figure 4D),
and residual plasma membrane staining was evident throughout the chase
(Figure 4, E and F). Tf and LDL that were endocytosed in HeLa-T7Hub
cells proceeded rapidly to the perinuclear aggregate (Figure 4E). For
this reason we conclude that sorting endosomes are present in the
perinuclear accumulation of endosomes. However, despite the altered
distribution of Tf- and LDL-containing vesicles in Hub-expressing
cells, the ligands sorted from one another with kinetics similar to
control cells. By 10 min of chase, induced HeLa-T7Hub cells contained a
substantial number of vesicles that stained only for Tf, despite the
fact that these vesicles remained clustered in the perinuclear area
(Figure 4F). This result indicates that proper sorting of Tf from LDL
did occur in the presence of Hub and that recycling vesicles (which
stain only for Tf) are also included in the perinuclear aggregate.
|
The appearance of green (Tf-containing) vesicles by 5-10 min of chase
indicates that Tf properly sorts from LDL in induced HeLa-T7Hub cells.
Interestingly, despite the appearance of Tf-containing vesicles, there
was not a corresponding appearance of vesicles staining only for LDL,
as is seen in control cells (Figure 4, F vs. C). The majority of
LDL-containing vesicles in induced HeLa-T7Hub cells continued to
costain for Tf, at least partially, throughout the 10-min chase. This
finding could indicate that LDL is not progressing to late
endosomes/lysosomes or that the maturation of these latter compartments
is disrupted by the expression of Hub. However, an alternative
explanation for the continued existence of yellow-staining vesicles in
HeLa-T7Hub cells is that because of inhibition of endocytosis, material
from the cell surface continues to arrive in the early endocytic
compartment throughout the chase. To test this possibility, cells were
pulsed with labeled Tf and LDL, and residual surface label was stripped
with an acid wash before incubation in chase medium. Under these
conditions, sorting of Tf and LDL occurred identically in induced
HeLa-T7Hub cells and control cells (Figure
5). Thus, despite the effect of clathrin inhibition on the distribution of early endosomes, there is not a
corresponding effect on early endosomal sorting or recycling functions.
|
Hub-induced Redistribution of EEA1-positive Endosomes Observed in Two Cell Lines
The observation that receptor recycling and sorting were not
substantially affected in induced HeLa-T7Hub cells suggests that the
compartments that mediate these functions were still intact in
Hub-expressing cells. The EEA1 marker of early endosomes is characteristic of both sorting and recycling endosomes (Mu et al., 1995
). To confirm their presence in the perinuclear aggregate of endocytic vesicles in Hub-expressing cells, these cells were labeled
with Alexa488-Tf (internalized for 60 min) and an antibody against the
EEA1 protein (Figure 6, A and B).
EEA1-positive vesicles were seen in the perinuclear aggregate of
endosomes in Hub-expressing cells, colocalized with internalized Tf.
EEA1-positive vesicles were observed colocalized with internalized Tf
in control cells but were more dispersed in the periphery. Note that,
in the experiment shown, the expression of Hub in the induced
HeLa-T7Hub cells varied from cell to cell and the degree of perinuclear
aggregation of endosomes varied correspondingly, but the aggregate was
consistently EEA1-positive. In both Hub-expressing cells and control
cells, vesicles labeling independently for each marker were also
observed. This is likely because, to label the endocytic pathway with
Alexa488-Tf, cells were allowed to internalize the Tf continuously over
a period of 60 min without washing. Under these conditions some Tf is
internalized independent of RME and may therefore progress to late
endosomes and lysosomes (EEA1-negative compartments).
|
To determine whether the effect of Hub on early endosome distribution is specific to HeLa cells or reflects a general role of clathrin in influencing localization in the endocytic pathway, CHO cells were transiently transfected with Hub and the distribution of endosomes was analyzed (Figure 6, C and D). Again, the level of Hub expression varied in the population of transiently transfected CHO cells, but perinuclear aggregation of endosomes was observed in ~50% of Hub-expressing cells. In all CHO cells in which Hub-induced perinuclear aggregation of Tf-containing endosomes was observed, the aggregated endosomes were EEA1 positive.
| |
DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The role of clathrin-coated buds on endosomes was analyzed with the use of the dominant-negative clathrin inhibitor Hub to disrupt clathrin function, and a novel effect of clathrin inhibition on the distribution of early endosomes was observed. The steady-state distribution of EEA1-positive endosomes was much more condensed in HeLa or CHO cells expressing Hub than in control cells. When clathrin was inhibited by Hub expression, early endosomes were transported rapidly into the perinuclear region. Based on the early appearance of perinuclear vesicles that stain for both Tf and LDL and the later appearance of vesicles in the same region containing only Tf (Figures 4 and 5), we concluded that both sorting and recycling endosomes exist in this perinuclear aggregate. These data suggest that endosomal clathrin-coated buds play a role in maintaining the cellular organization of the early endocytic compartment.
The link between clathrin and early endosome distribution remains
unclear, but it may be that clathrin is needed either to remove or
retain certain membrane components to achieve proper endosomal
attachment to or movement along microtubules. In migrating fibroblasts,
TfR preferentially recycles to the leading lamella, suggesting that
recycling occurs along the direction of a polarized microtubule
cytoskeleton (Hopkins et al., 1994
). Early endosomes have
been shown to associate with microtubules (Marsh et al., 1995
), and an intact microtubule cytoskeleton is needed to maintain the
pericentriolar organization of the recycling compartment in CHO cells
(McGraw et al., 1993
). Additionally, polarized recycling in
MDCK cells is dependent on the cytosolic domain of TfR and the presence
of clathrin-coated buds on endosomes (Odorizzi et al., 1996
;
Futter et al., 1998
), suggesting that clathrin mediates the
directionality of recycling. Another possibility is that clathrin promotes an association of endosomes with the actin cytoskeleton that
is necessary for maintaining the initial dispersed distribution of
early endosomes. Hub expression interferes with the interaction between
clathrin-coated pits and actin at the plasma membrane (Bennett and
Brodsky, unpublished results), and inhibition of this interaction may
facilitate movement along microtubules, resulting in accumulation of
early endosomes in the perinuclear area as shown here. The work
presented here and the prior studies just cited suggest that the
morphology of the early endosomal compartment is organized, at least in
part, by the microtubule and actin cytoskeleton. Clathrin could mediate
the relationship between both the microtubule and the actin
cytoskeleton and early endosomes either through links between clathrin
and cytoskeletal components or through CCV controlling the transport of
proteins that interact with cytoskeletal elements.
Although we did not find evidence of a direct role for clathrin in the
trafficking events of protein sorting or recycling, the suggestion that
clathrin might mediate receptor sorting and recycling is not
ill-founded. The existence of clathrin-coated buds on endosomes
enriched for Tf and TfR (Killisch et al., 1992
; Whitney
et al., 1995
; Stoorvogel et al., 1996
) and the
requirement for clathrin in proper basolateral targeting of recycling
TfR in polarized MDCK cells (Futter et al., 1998
) are
strongly suggestive of a role for clathrin in the postendocytic
trafficking of TfR. However, in accordance with prior kinetics studies
(Jing et al., 1990
; McGraw and Maxfield, 1990
; Mayor
et al., 1993
; Damke et al., 1994
) we were unable
to detect a significant effect of clathrin inhibition on the sorting or
recycling of Tf. We conclude that, although clathrin plays a direct
role in the trafficking of proteins at the plasma membrane and
trans-Golgi network, it plays a different role in receptor sorting and
recycling. Clathrin seems to be required for the localization of
compartments that mediate these processes but not for their sorting or
recycling functions. The actual mechanics of protein sorting and
recycling are most likely controlled by physical sorting mechanisms
such as iterative membrane budding (Dunn et al., 1989
;
reviewed by Mukherjee et al., 1997
).
That Hub can so drastically alter the distribution of early endosomes
without greatly affecting the kinetics of receptor sorting and
recycling is surprising but not without precedent. The distribution of
recycling endosomes varies among cell types (Hopkins et al., 1990
; Tooze and Hollinshead, 1991
; McGraw et al., 1993
;
Apodaca et al., 1994
; Ghosh et al., 1994
; Marsh
et al., 1995
; Daro et al., 1996
), indicating that
the overall organization of the recycling compartment is not crucial to
its function. This fact is further illustrated by the observation that
reorganization of the recycling compartment does not result in altered
receptor recycling kinetics (McGraw et al., 1993
; Johnson
et al., 1996
; Futter et al., 1998
). Thus, under
conditions that disrupt the distribution of early endosomes,
trafficking through this compartment occurs with normal kinetics. These
results raise the issue as to why there is any organization of the
early endosomal compartment if sorting and recycling can occur normally
when the compartment is disrupted. It is likely that, in the context of
an organized tissue, there is a much greater need for polarized sorting
and recycling functions than in the tissue culture cells used in these
experiments. Therefore, clathrin's role in maintaining endosomal
organization is probably of greater importance in complex tissue.
The results presented here, in combination with prior work, point to a role for clathrin on endosomes that is characteristically distinct from its role at the plasma membrane and is quite different from the protein trafficking roles of clathrin that are so well studied. The role for clathrin-coated buds on endosomes appears to be to maintain organelle localization rather than directly transporting or sorting receptors as CCV do in RME and at the trans-Golgi network.
| |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
We thank Ira Tabas from Columbia University, New York, for providing DiI-LDL and Harald Stenmark from The Radium Hospital, Oslo, Sweden, for providing the polyclonal antibody against EEA1. This research was supported by National Institutes of Health grants GM57657 and AI45865 to F.M.B. and DK27083 to F.R.M. and a grant from the Wellcome Trust to M.C.T.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
Corresponding author. E-mail address:
fmarbro{at}itsa.ucsf.edu.
| |
ABBREVIATIONS |
|---|
Abbreviations used: C6-NBD-SM, 6-{(N-[7-nitrobenz-2-oxa-1,3-diazol-4-yl]amino)-hexanoyl}sphingosyl phosphocholine; CCV, clathrin-coated vesicles; CHO, Chinese hamster ovary; DiI, 3,3'-dioctadecylindocarbocyanine; EEA1, early endosome antigen 1; LDL, low-density lipoprotein; MDCK, Madin-Darby canine kidney; PBS, phosphate-buffered saline; RME, receptor-mediated endocytosis; Tf, transferrin; TfR, transferrin receptor.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
-adaptin-coated domains on endosomal tubules.
J. Cell Biol.
141, 611-623
2Macroglobulin binding to the plasma membrane of cultured fibroblasts.
J. Cell Biol.
82, 614-625This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. Cabezas, K. G. Bache, A. Brech, and H. Stenmark Alix regulates cortical actin and the spatial distribution of endosomes J. Cell Sci., June 15, 2005; 118(12): 2625 - 2635. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Pagano, P. Crottet, C. Prescianotto-Baschong, and M. Spiess In Vitro Formation of Recycling Vesicles from Endosomes Requires Adaptor Protein-1/Clathrin and Is Regulated by Rab4 and the Connector Rabaptin-5 Mol. Biol. Cell, November 1, 2004; 15(11): 4990 - 5000. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. A. Keyel, S. C. Watkins, and L. M. Traub Endocytic Adaptor Molecules Reveal an Endosomal Population of Clathrin by Total Internal Reflection Fluorescence Microscopy J. Biol. Chem., March 26, 2004; 279(13): 13190 - 13204. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Zobiack, U. Rescher, C. Ludwig, D. Zeuschner, and V. Gerke The Annexin 2/S100A10 Complex Controls the Distribution of Transferrin Receptor-containing Recycling Endosomes Mol. Biol. Cell, December 1, 2003; 14(12): 4896 - 4908. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Hinrichsen, J. Harborth, L. Andrees, K. Weber, and E. J. Ungewickell Effect of Clathrin Heavy Chain- and {alpha}-Adaptin-specific Small Inhibitory RNAs on Endocytic Accessory Proteins and Receptor Trafficking in HeLa Cells J. Biol. Chem., November 14, 2003; 278(46): 45160 - 45170. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T.-G. Iversen, G. Skretting, B. van Deurs, and K. Sandvig From the Cover: Clathrin-coated pits with long, dynamin-wrapped necks upon expression of a clathrin antisense RNA PNAS, April 29, 2003; 100(9): 5175 - 5180. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. R. Wettey, S. F. C. Hawkins, A. Stewart, J. P. Luzio, J. C. Howard, and A. P. Jackson Controlled Elimination of Clathrin Heavy-Chain Expression in DT40 Lymphocytes Science, August 30, 2002; 297(5586): 1521 - 1525. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. M. van Dam and W. Stoorvogel Dynamin-dependent Transferrin Receptor Recycling by Endosome-derived Clathrin-coated Vesicles Mol. Biol. Cell, January 1, 2002; 13(1): 169 - 182. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||