|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Vol. 13, Issue 2, 435-444, February 2002
Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX1 3PS United Kingdom
Submitted August 29, 2001; Revised October 31, 2001; Accepted November 5, 2001| |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
A critical event in eukaryotic DNA replication involves association of minichromosome maintenance (MCM2-7) proteins with origins, to form prereplicative complexes (pre-RCs) that are competent for initiation. The ability of mutants defective in MCM2-7 function to complete meiosis had suggested that pre-RC components could be irrelevant to premeiotic S phase. We show here that MCM2-7 proteins bind to chromatin in fission yeast cells preparing for meiosis and during premeiotic S phase in a manner suggesting they in fact are required for DNA replication in the meiotic cycle. This is confirmed by analysis of a degron mcm4 mutant, which cannot carry out premeiotic DNA replication. Later in meiosis, Mcm4 chromatin association is blocked between meiotic nuclear divisions, presumably accounting for the absence of a second round of DNA replication. Together, these results emphasize similarity between replication mechanisms in mitotic and meiotic cell cycles.
| |
INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In meiosis, the normal alternation of S phase and chromosome disjunction seen in the mitotic cell cycle is altered so that a single round of premeiotic DNA replication is followed by two consecutive nuclear divisions, thus achieving a reduction in ploidy. Strict control to ensure a single round of DNA replication in premeiotic S phase is important to produce haploid cells containing a single complete copy of the genome, but the mechanism of this control has not been subject to as much analysis as in the vegetative cell cycle.
Analysis of mutants affecting replication enzymes such as DNA
polymerases suggests that the basic mechanisms of S phase in the
meiotic and mitotic cell cycles are similar (Schild and Byers, 1978
;
Johnston et al., 1982
; Budd et al., 1989
;
Forsburg and Hodson, 2000
). Furthermore, analysis of replication origin
usage in Saccharomyces cerevisiae is consistent with basic
conservation in the initiation mechanism (Collins and Newlon, 1994
). In
general, the same origins are used in both premeiotic and vegetative S
phases, perhaps reflecting the fact that similar events at the origin
recognition complex (ORC), which is bound to initiation sites, are
occurring in both types of cell cycle. In the mitotic cell cycle, this
involves association of six MCM2-7 proteins at ORC during late
mitosis/early G1 in a process dependent on Cdc6/Cdc18 and Cdt1
(reviewed by Kearsey and Labib, 1998
; Kelly and Brown, 2000
; Maiorano
et al., 2000
; Nishitani et al., 2000
). This
process of prereplicative complex (pre-RC) formation confers
replicative competence on the origin, allowing Cdc7 and
cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK)-activated initiation of DNA synthesis
during the subsequent S phase. During DNA replication, MCM2-7 proteins
are thought to provide helicase activity for the elongation step of DNA
replication (reviewed in Labib and Diffley, 2001
). These proteins
dissociate from chromatin, probably during replication termination, and
cannot rebind because this step is inhibited by CDK activity and other
mechanisms involving pre-RC components (Dahmann et al.,
1995
; Tanaka et al., 1997
; Labib et al., 1999
;
Wohlschlegel et al., 2000
; Tada et al., 2001
). Thus, reinitiation is dependent on CDK inactivation in mitosis, limiting DNA replication to a single round per cell cycle.
In spite of these general similarities, some observations suggest that
premeiotic S phase is not identical to vegetative DNA replication, and
these differences could be related to specialized meiotic processes.
Premeiotic S phase is universally longer than the S phase in cycling
cells of the same organism (Holm, 1977
; Cha et al., 2000
),
and this may reflect the activity of proteins needed for reductional
chromosome segregation, such as Rec8, whose correct function is
intimately associated with DNA replication (Cha et al.,
2000
; Watanabe et al., 2001
). In S. cerevisiae,
deletion of replication origins can delay double-strand break (DSB)
appearance, perhaps because of coupling between replication and
recombination (Borde et al., 2000
) and preventing S phase
activation also blocks DSB formation (Smith et al., 2001
).
There is also evidence that pre-RC formation and the mechanism of
initiation and elongation in premeiotic S phase may be significantly
different. Specifically, mcm2, mcm4, and
cdc18 mutants of Schizosaccharomyces pombe are not arrested in premeiotic S phase or the subsequent nuclear divisions under conditions that block vegetative DNA replication (Forsburg and
Hodson, 2000
). Also, in budding yeast, although CDK activity is needed
for activation of premeiotic S phase (Iino et al., 1995
; Dirick et al., 1998
; Stuart and Wittenberg, 1998
), Cdc7 may
not be required (Schild and Byers, 1978
; Hollingsworth and Sclafani, 1993
), which could reflect different regulatory controls over DNA replication.
Here we have investigated the role of MCM2-7 proteins as fission yeast cells exit the mitotic cell cycle and enter meiosis. By a combination of chromatin association assays and genetic analysis using novel degron alleles, we provide clear evidence that MCM2-7 proteins have an essential role in meiotic as well as vegetative S phases.
| |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Fission Yeast Strains and Methods
Strains used are shown in Table 1.
Media and growth conditions and standard genetic methods were as
described by Moreno et al. (1991)
. Diploid pat1
strains were made by protoplast fusion. P-factor arrest was carried out
as described in Stern and Nurse (1997)
using a P-factor concentration
of 1.5 µg/ml in minimal medium supplemented with leucine. Thiamine at
5 µg/ml was used to repress the nmt1 promoter. Nitrogen
starvation was carried out using EMM medium lacking
NH4Cl.
|
Tagging Mcm2, Mcm4, and Mcm6 with GFP
Mcm2+ and
mcm6+ genes, expressed from their own
promoters, were tagged to express C-terminally-fused GFP5, as described
earlier for mcm4+ (Kearsey et
al., 2000
). We constructed a GFP-containing integration vector,
pSMRG2+, containing GFP5 and the kanMX6 selectable marker (EMBL accession no. AJ306910). This involved replacing the NgoM IV fragment containing the
ura4+ gene in pSMUG (Kearsey et
al., 2000
) with a kanMX6 fragment, which was amplified
using the primers 5'-atttagccggctgtttagcttgcctcgtccc-3' and
5'-aattgccggcgagctcgtttaaactggatgg-3' from pFA6a-kanMX6
(Bahler et al., 1998
). Also the linker region upstream of
GFP was enlarged by inserting the sequence
5'-ctcgagggtagatctggtgcccggggtggtgctggtgccggagccggtgctggtgctgaagctt-3' between the unique XhoI and HindIII sites. The
C-terminal encoding region of the mcm2+
gene was amplified using primers 5'-
acgactcgagacactacaattccttttaat-3' and 5'-
ccaccccgggcaataagatatttagcaaatgttc-3' and cloned into the
XhoI and SmaI sites of pSMRG2+. Homologous
integration into the mcm2+ gene was
directed by linearization with NheI. For
mcm6+, a similar procedure was used, using
the primers 5'-gaacggggcccgcaagagcaaactgtgtag-3' and 5'-
cttgccccgggcgttcggaacatcgccattgc-3' and cloning into the ApaI and SmaI sites. The plasmid was linearized
using XhoI to direct integration into the
mcm6+ locus. Constructs were verified by
sequencing. The Mcm2-GFP and Mcm6-GFP strains have a normal growth rate
and DNA content by flow cytometry, indicating that the tagged proteins
are functional.
For tagging the mcm4+ gene in the
background of the cyclin B shut-off strain (nmt1(41X)-cdc13,
cdc13
cig1
cig2
; Fisher and Nurse, 1995
) we
replaced the ura4+ marker in
pSMUG+mcm4-GFP (Kearsey et al., 2000
) with an
NgoM IV fragment containing the kanMX6
(kanr) marker (see above), to give
pSMRG+mcm4-GFP. This was linearized with HpaI to direct
integration at the mcm4+ locus, thus
generating strain P886. Because this strain is thiamine sensitive and
kanMX6 cannot be selected for on minimal (EMM) medium, we devised a
modified medium (KsnoT, Kanamycin-selective, no thiamine: bacto-peptone
10 g/l, 3% glucose, 2% agar, 250 mg/l adenine, 250 mg/l uracil, 250 mg/l leucine, 75 µg/ml geneticin), which allows kanamycin selection
in a thiamine-deficient medium. pSMRG+mcm4-GFP was also used to tag
mcm4+ in pat1ts strains.
Degron Construction
To construct the degron mcm4 strain, a plasmid was
constructed containing the
mcm4+/cdc21+
promoter, expressing an N-terminal ubiquitin-degron-HA cassette fused
to the mcm4+/cdc21 gene. The
degron was amplified as an ApaI-XhoI fragment using primers 5'-atagggcccctgcttatctttcttcttcc-3' and
5'-atactcgaggcttgccctcctaaaaatgc-3', with plasmid pPW66R
(Dohman et al., 1994
) as template. The
mcm4+ promoter was amplified as a
KpnI-ApaI fragment using the primers: 5'-ataggtaccccgcatttgatggtttcgcc-3' and
5'-atagggccccgtggtgggtgtagaaagac-3'. Both fragments were
cloned into KpnI and XhoI cleaved pSMUG2+ (ura4+-containining integration
vector, identical to pSMRG2+, except containing the
ura4+ gene instead of the
kanMX6 marker; EMBL accession no. AJ306911) to give
pSMUG2+degron. The 5' region of the mcm4+
reading frame was amplified as a XhoI-BglII
fragment using the primers
5'-atactcgaggtcctctagtcagcaaagtg-3' and
5'-ataagatcttcaatttgtcaatgtcaccag-3'. This fragment was
cloned into the XhoI-BglII region of
pSMUG2+degron to give pSMUG2+degron+mcm4. The final construct was
verified by sequencing. This plasmid was cleaved with SpeI
to direct integration into the mcm4+ locus
and thus tag the endogenous gene with the degron. The same strategy was
used to construct the mcm4ts-td allele as the
mcm4ts mutation (cdc21-M68) causes a Leu to Pro
substitution at position 238, i.e., is not in the N-terminal region of
the protein (S. Montgomery and S.E. Kearsey, manuscript in preparation).
Chromatin Binding Assay
Chromatin binding of GFP-tagged proteins was analyzed using a
modified version of the protocol described in Kearsey et al. (2000)
. Instead of ZM buffer, cells were resuspended in ZM2 buffer (15 mM potassium hydrogen phthalate, 15 mM
Na2HPO4, pH 7.0, 90 mM
NH4Cl, 1.2 M sorbitol, 10 mM dithiothreitol) and
zymolyase 20-T was added to 2 mg/ml. Cells were washed twice in ZM
buffer, once in EB2 (20 mM PIPES-KOH, pH 6.8, 0.4 M sorbitol, 1 mM
EDTA, 0.5 mM spermidine-HCl, 1.5 mM spermine-HCl, 150 mM KAc, 1/1000 volume protease inhibitor cocktail; P-8215, Sigma, St. Louis, MO), and cells were extracted in EB2 containing 1% (wt/vol)
Triton X-100 for 5 min at 20°C. Cells were fixed with
methanol/acetone and analyzed by fluorescence microscopy as previously
described (Kearsey et al., 2000
). At least 100 cells were
counted for each data point, and error bars show the range of two
experiments. For flow cytometry, methanol/acetone fixed cells were
rehydrated in 10 mM EDTA, pH 8.0, 0.1 mg/ml RNase A, 2 µg/ml
propidium iodide or 1 µM sytox green, and incubated at 37°C for
2 h. Cells were analyzed using a Coulter Epics XL-MCL (Fullerton, CA).
Protein Analysis
Protein extracts were made by TCA extraction and analyzed by
Western blotting as described previously (Grallert et al.,
2000
). Mcm4 was detected using a mouse mAb KL2.2, which was generated against full-length, bacterially expressed Mcm4 (Maiorano et
al., 1996
). The recognized epitope is in the N-terminal 302 amino
acids (unpublished observations).
-Tubulin was detected using Sigma T5168 at a dilution of 1/10,000.
| |
RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Mcm4 Is Chromatin Bound in Cells Arrested in G1 Phase by Mating Pheromone
To determine the relevance of MCM2-7 proteins for premeiotic DNA
replication, we examined the chromatin association of these proteins as
cells exit vegetative growth and prepare for mating and meiosis. In
fission yeast, meiosis is induced by nutrient deprivation, which causes
haploid cells to express mating pheromones, arrest in G1, and conjugate
to form a diploid zygote. Usually, meiosis then commences immediately,
followed by sporulation to form a four-spored ascus. To follow pre-RC
formation during this process we used an in situ
detergent-washing procedure to examine the chromatin binding of
GFP-tagged MCM2-7 proteins in single fission yeast cells. MCM proteins
that are bound to chromatin are resistant to detergent extraction and
remain nuclear, whereas unbound nucleoplasmic protein is washed away.
Using this method, we have previously shown that chromatin association
of Mcm4 (Cdc21) is restricted to the interval from mid-anaphase to S
phase and shows an expected dependence on ORC and Cdc18 (Kearsey
et al., 2000
). To study the effect of the P-factor mating
pheromone on Mcm4 chromatin binding without the need for simultaneous
nutrient deprivation, we used a genetic background that allows
pheromone-induced G1 arrest of nonstarved cells. Deleting the
cyr1+ gene lowers intracellular cAMP
levels, thus activating genes needed for the mating pheromone reponse
(Maeda et al., 1990
), and deleting the
sxa2+ gene reduces P-factor proteolysis
(Imai and Yamamoto, 1992
; Ladds et al., 1996
). Thus, by
introducing Mcm4-GFP into a cyr1
sxa2
genetic
background, Mcm4 chromatin binding could be monitored during P-factor
arrest of exponentially growing cells (Figure 1A). Before addition of P-factor, Mcm4
was only chromatin associated in binucleate (late M/G1/S phase) cells
(Figure 1, B and C) as in a wild-type strain. In contrast, 3.5 h
after addition of P-factor, 1C cells were prominent by flow cytometry
and a high proportion of uninucleate cells were positive for Mcm4
chromatin binding, implying that pre-RC assembly had occurred in
G1-arrested cells (Figure 1, B-D). Chromatin association of Mcm4
appeared to be stable at least up to 7 h, but it was not possible
to investigate this for longer periods because pheromone-arrested cells
start to enter S phase after about 8 h of arrest (Davey and
Nielsen, 1994
; Imai and Yamamoto, 1994
). We also observed that
wild-type cells arrested in G1 phase by a brief period (4-7 h) of
nitrogen starvation alone showed chromatin-associated Mcm4,
although this association was not stable on longer periods of arrest
(>12 h, see below). These results show that cells arrested in a state competent for mating and meiosis have chromatin-bound Mcm4, implying this could be relevant to execution of DNA replication in the meiotic
cycle.
|
Because previous studies have shown that inhibition of Cdc2 activity is
responsible for cell cycle arrest in G1 by mating pheromone (Stern and
Nurse, 1997
, 1998
), we examined the effect of directly inhibiting Cdc2
activity on Mcm4 chromatin association. This was examined in a strain
containing a thiamine-repressible cdc13+
gene in the background of cyclin B gene deletions (cig1
,
cig2
, and cdc13
), which arrests mainly in
G1 after addition of thiamine to the medium (Figure
2, A and D; Fisher and Nurse, 1995
). Mcm4 was shown to be chromatin associated in G1-arrested cells (Figure 2, B
and C), implying that inhibition of Cdc2 activity alone is sufficient
to explain Mcm4 chromatin association seen in cells arrested by mating
pheromone.
|
Mcm4 Associates with Chromatin during Premeiotic S Phase but not during the Interval Between Meiosis I and II
To examine more directly whether Mcm4 associated with chromatin in
G1-arrested cells is relevant to meiosis, we determined whether this
and other MCM2-7 proteins bind to chromatin during premeiotic S phase.
It is difficult to examine this process in a wild-type diploid, because
entry to meiosis on nutrient starvation is rather asynchronous. We
therefore made use of a temperature-sensitive pat1 allele
(pat1ts), which encodes a defective negative regulator of
meiosis, and even haploid strains containing this allele can be induced
to enter meiosis by shifting to the restrictive temperature (Iino and
Yamamoto, 1985
; Nurse, 1985
; McLeod and Beach, 1986
). Pat1 inactivation
leads to a meiosis that is very similar to that induced physiologically
by nutrient deprivation and has been generally used for analyzing
meiotic mechanisms. A pat1ts strain was arrested in G1 by
nitrogen starvation for 16 h, after which meiosis was induced by
shifting to the restrictive temperature and refeeding (Figure
3A). Initially Mcm4 was not chromatin
bound, although binding increased after 2 h, and peaked slightly
in advance of the time of premeiotic S phase (Figure 3, B-D). As
premeiotic S phase finished, Mcm4 chromatin association was lost.
Similar results were obtained using a diploid pat1 strain
shifted to 34°C (Figure 4, A and D),
these conditions being compatible with a viable meiosis (Bähler
et al., 1991
), although the timing of premeiotic S phase was
a little advanced compared with the haploid strain (Figure 4C). Thus,
the timing of Mcm4 association with chromatin suggests that MCM
proteins function in premeiotic DNA replication as in a normal S phase.
|
|
Following later stages of the diploid meiosis showed that Mcm4 remained nuclear during meiosis I and II, but Mcm4 chromatin association was not seen at any stage between these nuclear divisions (Figure 4, A, B, and D, 5-6 h). Thus, a block to MCM chromatin association and pre-RC formation could account for absence of DNA replication between meiosis I and II. The resistance of spores to zymolyase digestion made it difficult to examine Mcm4 chromatin binding after meiosis II, but a high proportion of cells showed absence of Mcm4 chromatin binding (Figure 4A, 6 h; 4D, 5-6 h) before obvious spore formation. Thus, MCM chromatin association may have to be re-established after spore germination.
Arresting Premeiotic DNA Replication with Hydroxyurea Prevents Displacement of Mcm2, 4, and 6 Proteins from Chromatin
To test if the correlation of Mcm4 chromatin association with
premeiotic DNA replication reflects a direct involvement with DNA
synthesis, we examined how blocking S phase affected MCM2-7 chromatin
binding. In the vegetative cell cycle, arresting the elongation step of
DNA synthesis with hydroxyurea (HU) prevents the displacement of Mcm4
(Kearsey et al., 2000
). To extend the meiotic analysis to
other MCM2-7 proteins, we also tagged Mcm2 and Mcm6 with GFP. In
vegetative cells, these proteins are similar to Mcm4 in terms of cell
cycle changes in chromatin binding. Pat1ts strains
were arrested in G1 and induced to undergo premeiotic S phase after
refeeding and shifting to 37°C as before, except that HU was added to
half the culture (Figure 5A). In the
presence of HU, most cells showed chromatin binding of Mcm2, Mcm4, and Mcm6 after 5.5 h, whereas control cultures without HU had
completed premeiotic S phase and chromatin binding of these proteins
was not detected (Figure 5, B and D). Similar results were obtained using a diploid pat1ts mcm4-GFP strain. When the same
experiment was carried out with an Mcm2-GFP strain containing a
temperature-sensitive mcm4 mutation (mcm4ts-td,
see below), Mcm2 chromatin association was blocked (Figure 5, C and D).
Thus, there is mutual dependency of MCM2-7 proteins for chromatin
association, as has been shown in the vegetative cell cycle (Pasion and
Forsburg, 1999
; Labib et al. 2001
). Overall, these results
suggest that premeiotic S phase involves chromatin association of
MCM2-7 proteins and that displacement of these proteins from chromatin
requires completion of DNA replication as in the mitotic cell cycle.
|
A Degron Mutant Reveals a Requirement for Mcm4 in Premeiotic S Phase
To investigate whether chromatin association of MCM2-7 proteins
in premeiotic S phase reflects a functional requirement for these
proteins, we analyzed the effect on an mcm4 mutation on meiosis. Because available temperature-sensitive alleles of
mcm2-7 genes are rather leaky and do not block vegetative S
phase efficiently (e.g., Forsburg and Nurse, 1994
; Takahashi et
al. 1994
), we explored the use of temperature-sensitive degron
(td) alleles in S. pombe, because these have been useful for
clarifying MCM2-7 function in S. cerevisiae (Labib et
al., 2000
). We constructed a degron fusion of Mcm4
(mcm4td) where the N-terminus of Mcm4 is fused to the DHFR
degron (Dohman et al., 1994
), expressed from the native mcm4+ promoter. In S. cerevisiae this degron is stable at 25°C, but at 37°C the
degron is ubiquitylated by Ubr1, probably because of an increase in the
accessibility of its N-terminal arginine, leading to its rapid
proteolysis (Dohman et al., 1994
; Lévy et al., 1999
). In S. pombe, the mcm4td strain
grew normally and levels of the degron-Mcm4 protein were similar to
Mcm4 levels at 25°C, but at 37°C cells were elongated, implying
that the degron confers temperature sensitivity in this
organism. Flow cytometry did not show a tight block to DNA
replication; however, and Mcm4 levels were not dramatically
reduced, implying that Mcm4 degradation is too inefficient to
block DNA replication at initiation. To obtain a mutant with a tighter
phenotype, we modified a temperature-sensitive mcm4 allele
(mcm4ts/cdc21-M68; Nasmyth and Nurse, 1981
) by
fusion to the degron, to give a mcm4ts-td strain. This
mutant arrested with predominantly 1C DNA after shifting exponentially
growing cells to the restrictive temperature in contrast to the
mcm4ts mutant, which showed a leakier phenotype (Figure
6A). Western blotting showed that levels
of the Mcm4 protein were similar in the mcm4ts-td and
mcm4ts strains at 25°C and in the mcm4ts strain at 37°C, but a rapid reduction in protein levels in the
mcm4ts-td strain was seen at 37°C (Figure 6B). To
determine if the mcm4ts-td allele affected premeiotic DNA
replication, we constructed a double mutant of mcm4ts-td
with pat1ts, and G1-arrested cells were refed and shifted to
37°C. Control mcm4+ pat1ts cells carried
out premeiotic S phase around 3 h, whereas mcm4ts-td
pat1ts cells did not replicate their DNA, although a minor
fraction of cells exhibited partial replication (Figure 6C). This
effect on premeiotic S phase was more severe than that seen with a
mcm4ts (cdc21-M68) pat1ts mutant,
which showed more extensive replication as previously reported
(Forsburg and Hodson, 2000
; Murakami and Nurse, 2001
). Meiotic
nuclear divisions were also reduced in the degron mcm4
strain, consistent with a block in DNA replication (Figure 6D; Murakami
and Nurse, 1999
). Western analysis showed that levels of Mcm4 were
significantly reduced in the mcm4ts-td mutant compared with
mcm4+ strain after the nitrogen starvation
step, and there was a further reduction in protein levels only 30 min
after the shift to 37°C (Figure 6E). Protein levels were also lower
than in a mcm4ts strain, where we could detect Mcm4
throughout premeiotic S phase. We have also shown that a degron
mcm6 mutation blocks premeiotic S phase. Thus, these
results, taken together with analysis of MCM chromatin binding,
indicate that execution of premeiotic S phase requires the
participation of MCM2-7 proteins.
|
| |
DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In this article we have investigated MCM2-7 chromatin binding
and, by inference, pre-RC formation, during G1 arrest of the mitotic
cycle and entry into meiosis. In summary, S. pombe cells arrested in G1 by mating pheromone have chromatin-bound Mcm4. This
pre-RC formation is relevant to premeiotic S phase, because Mcm4 binds
to chromatin around the time of premeiotic S phase and S phase
completion is necessary to allow displacement of Mcm2, Mcm4, and Mcm6.
Analysis of a degron mutant shows that Mcm4 is essential for premeiotic
S phase and given that in the vegetative cell cycle MCM2-7 proteins
interact (Adachi et al., 1997
; Pasion and Forsburg, 1999
)
and are required for licensing and the elongation steps of replication
(Labib et al., 2000
; Prokhorova and Blow, 2000
; Tye and
Sawyer, 2000
), it is likely that all MCM2-7 proteins are required for
premeiotic DNA replication.
These results show pheromone arrest in S. pombe is similar
to that in S. cerevisiae, where
-factor also arrests
cells in G1 with pre-RCs assembled and MCM2-7 proteins bound to
chromatin (Diffley et al., 1994
; Donovan et al.,
1997
). The mechanisms of these cell cycle arrests are distinct in
detail, although in both cases pheromone blocks CDK activation
needed for S phase entry (Peter et al., 1993
; Peter
and Herskowitz, 1994
; Stern and Nurse, 1998
), whereas expression of
Cdc18/Cdc6 needed for pre-RC formation is not prevented (Zwerschke
et al., 1994
; Stern and Nurse, 1997
). Budding and fission
yeast cells have different fates after diploid formation, which is
relevant to the function of chromatin-associated MCM2-7 proteins.
Because S. cerevisiae haploid cells are constitutively competent for conjugation, MCM2-7 proteins in mating cells would generally function in a vegetative S phase. On the other hand, because
S. pombe cells only fuse on nutrient limitation and zygotes progress directly to meiosis, MCM2-7 proteins assembled onto chromatin in mating competent cells are likely to function in premeiotic S phase.
It is likely that a previous report suggesting that MCM2-7 proteins
are not needed for premeiotic S phase (Forsburg and Hodson, 2000
)
reflects the leaky nature of the original conditional alleles compared
with more efficient inactivation of Mcm4 function in our degron allele
While this article was in preparation, Murakami and Nurse (2001)
reported that using a higher restrictive temperature than that used in
the initial study does in fact prevent completion of premeiotic S
phase, using mcm2 and mcm4 mutants. One factor that could be relevant to why premeiotic DNA replication is not blocked
by mcm mutations under conditions that prevent completion of
vegetative S phase is the nitrogen starvation step used for G1
synchronization before meiotic entry. Nitrogen-starved cells have
increased levels of Rum1 compared with vegetative cells (Maekawa et al., 1998
) and thus depressed CDK activity, and CDK
levels are further reduced by enhanced proteolysis of cyclin B
(Yamaguchi et al., 1997
; Kitamura et al., 1998
;
Kominami et al., 1998
). Both these changes could suppress
mutations affecting Cdc18 or MCM2-7 function by promoting pre-RC
formation, based on analysis of mutants with reduced CDK levels
(Jallepalli and Kelly, 1996
; Grallert et al., 2000
). For
instance, enhanced Rum1 levels suppresses a cdc18 mutation
via inhibition of Cdc18 proteolysis (Jallepalli and Kelly, 1996
) and
deletion of the cig2+ B-type cyclin
suppresses cdc18, mcm2, and mcm4
mutations (Grallert et al., 2000
). Another possibility is
that the difference between premeiotic and vegetative DNA replication
might be quantitative in that less MCM2-7 function is required for
premeiotic S phase. It seems less likely that there is an alternative
meiotic replication pathway capable of compensating for loss of MCM2-7
function, given the effective replication arrest seen in the degron
mcm4 mutant.
Mcm4 levels are maintained through meiosis (Forsburg and Hodson, 2000
),
but chromatin association of Mcm4 does not occur between meiosis I and
II even though the protein remains nuclear (Figure 4), presumably
accounting for the absence of a second round of DNA replication.
Inactivation of components required for pre-RC formation would provide
an obvious mechanism to block MCM chromatin association, and it is of
interest that in Xenopus incomplete inactivation of Cdc2
after meiosis I is required for preventing DNA replication (Iwabuchi
et al., 2000
; Nakajo et al., 2000
). If a similar
situation applies to fission yeast, Cdc2-mediated destabilization of
Cdc18 (Baum et al., 1998
) could constitute one
mechanism to ensure that only a single round of DNA replication occurs
in meiosis.
| |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
The authors thank Paul Nurse's group for strains and plasmids and for communicating results before publication; Sue Cotterill, Tim Humphrey, and Karim Labib for discussion and comments on the manuscript; and Ben Martynoga and Ashley Spearing for technical help. This work was supported by the EU TMR program (contract ERB-MRX-CT970125) and the Cancer Research Campaign (grant SP1897/0301).
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* Corresponding author. E-mail address: stephen.kearsey{at}zoo.ox.ac.uk.
Article published online ahead of print. Mol. Biol. Cell 10.1091/mbc.01-11-0537. Article and publication date are at www.molbiolcell.org/cgi/10.1091/mbc.01-11-0537.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. M. Bailis, D. D. Luche, T. Hunter, and S. L. Forsburg Minichromosome Maintenance Proteins Interact with Checkpoint and Recombination Proteins To Promote S-Phase Genome Stability Mol. Cell. Biol., March 1, 2008; 28(5): 1724 - 1738. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Rothenberg, M. A. Trakselis, S. D. Bell, and T. Ha MCM Forked Substrate Specificity Involves Dynamic Interaction with the 5'-Tail J. Biol. Chem., November 23, 2007; 282(47): 34229 - 34234. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Gullerova, A. Barta, and Z. J. Lorkovic Rct1, a Nuclear RNA Recognition Motif-Containing Cyclophilin, Regulates Phosphorylation of the RNA Polymerase II C-Terminal Domain Mol. Cell. Biol., May 15, 2007; 27(10): 3601 - 3611. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. E. Cohen, S. E. Pollack, and J. W. Pollard Genetic Analysis of Chromosome Pairing, Recombination, and Cell Cycle Control during First Meiotic Prophase in Mammals Endocr. Rev., June 1, 2006; 27(4): 398 - 426. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Ogino, K. Hirota, S. Matsumoto, T. Takeda, K. Ohta, K.-i. Arai, and H. Masai Hsk1 kinase is required for induction of meiotic dsDNA breaks without involving checkpoint kinases in fission yeast PNAS, May 23, 2006; 103(21): 8131 - 8136. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. Wang, C. Mei, B. Tang, H. Zhao, C. Xu, Z. Li, X. Shen, W. Fu, and B. Dai Aberrant expression of SPARC and its impact on proliferation and apoptosis in ADPKD cyst-lining epithelia Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., May 1, 2006; 21(5): 1278 - 1288. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Valentin, E. Schwob, and F. D. Seta Dual Role of the Cdc7-regulatory Protein Dbf4 during Yeast Meiosis J. Biol. Chem., February 3, 2006; 281(5): 2828 - 2834. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Dresselhaus, K.-o. Srilunchang, D. Leljak-Levanic, D. N. Schreiber, and P. Garg The Fertilization-Induced DNA Replication Factor MCM6 of Maize Shuttles between Cytoplasm and Nucleus, and Is Essential for Plant Growth and Development Plant Physiology, February 1, 2006; 140(2): 512 - 527. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Traka, A. V. Gasper, J. A. Smith, C. J. Hawkey, Y. Bao, and R. F. Mithen Transcriptome Analysis of Human Colon Caco-2 Cells Exposed to Sulforaphane J. Nutr., August 1, 2005; 135(8): 1865 - 1872. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Strich, M. J. Mallory, M. Jarnik, and K. F. Cooper Cyclin B-Cdk Activity Stimulates Meiotic Rereplication in Budding Yeast Genetics, August 1, 2004; 167(4): 1621 - 1628. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Ofir, S. Sagee, N. Guttmann-Raviv, L. Pnueli, and Y. Kassir The Role and Regulation of the preRC Component Cdc6 in the Initiation of Premeiotic DNA Replication Mol. Biol. Cell, May 1, 2004; 15(5): 2230 - 2242. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. L. Forsburg Eukaryotic MCM Proteins: Beyond Replication Initiation Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev., March 1, 2004; 68(1): 109 - 131. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Stevens, M. Grelon, D. Vezon, J. Oh, P. Meyer, C. Perennes, S. Domenichini, and C. Bergounioux A CDC45 Homolog in Arabidopsis Is Essential for Meiosis, as Shown by RNA Interference-Induced Gene Silencing PLANT CELL, January 1, 2004; 16(1): 99 - 113. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. L. Kaplan, M. J. Davey, and M. O'Donnell Mcm4,6,7 Uses a "Pump in Ring" Mechanism to Unwind DNA by Steric Exclusion and Actively Translocate along a Duplex J. Biol. Chem., December 5, 2003; 278(49): 49171 - 49182. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||