![]() |
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Vol. 13, Issue 2, 683-697, February 2002
Laboratory of Molecular Cardiology, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892
Submitted July 20, 2001; Revised October 24, 2001; Accepted November 8, 2001| |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
We ectopically expressed the transcription factor Pitx2a, one of
the Pitx2 isoforms, in HeLa cells by using a tetracycline-inducible expression system and examined whether Pitx2a was capable of modulating Rho GTPase signaling and altering the cell's cytoskeleton. Ectopic expression of Pitx2a induced actin-myosin reorganization, leading to
increased cell spreading, suppression of cell migration, and the
strengthening of cell-cell adhesion, marked by the accumulation and
localization of
-catenin and N-cadherin to the sites of cell-cell contacts. Moreover, Pitx2a expression resulted in activation of the Rho
GTPases Rac1 and RhoA, and the dominant negative Rac1 mutant N17Rac1
inhibited cell spreading and disrupted localization of
-catenin to
the sites of cell-cell contacts. Both reorganization of actin-myosin
and cell spreading require phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase
activity, which is also necessary for activation of the Rho GTPase
proteins. Pitx2a induced the expression of Trio, a guanine nucleotide
exchange factor for Rac1 and RhoA, which preceded cell spreading, and
the expression of Trio protein was down-regulated after the changes in
cell spreading and cell morphology were initiated. In addition, Pitx2a
also induces cell cycle arrest at G0/G1, most likely due to the
accumulation of the tumor suppressor proteins p53 and p21. Our data
indicate that the transcriptional activities initiated in the nucleus
by Pitx2a result in profound changes in HeLa cell morphology,
migration, and proliferation.
| |
INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Pitx2, a bicoid-type homeodomain transcription factor, has been
implicated as one of the genes responsible for Rieger's syndrome in
humans (Semina et al., 1996
; Alward, 2000
; Amendt et
al., 2000
). Rieger's syndrome is an autosomal-dominant
genetic disorder characterized by ocular, craniofacial, and umbilical
abnormalities with occasional defects in cardiac, limb, and pituitary
development (Alward, 2000
; Amendt et al., 2000
). As one of
the downstream targets for Sonic Hedgehog and Nodal, Pitx2 also plays a
crucial role in determining left-right asymmetry during organogenesis
in mice (Meno et al., 1998
; Piedra et al., 1998
;
Ryan et al., 1998
; Yoshioka et al., 1998
),
chickens (Logan et al., 1998
; Piedra et al.,
1998
; Ryan et al., 1998
; Yoshioka et al., 1998
;
St Amand et al., 2000
), frogs (Ryan et al., 1998
;
Campione et al., 1999
), and zebrafish (Campione et
al., 1999
). Knockout experiments further confirm that mice lacking
Pitx2 show right pulmonary isomerism and defects in cardiac, ocular,
tooth, and pituitary development (Gage et al., 1999
;
Kitamura et al., 1999
; Lin et al., 1999
; Lu
et al., 1999
). It is thought that cell proliferation, cell
death, and cell motility, as well as changes in instructive signals for
cell fate in local areas during organogenesis, are involved in
directing asymmetric development of specific organs (Lin et
al., 1999
; Logan et al., 1998
; Capdevila et
al., 2000
). Pitx2 was also isolated as a downstream target for the
human acute leukemia ALL1 gene, the homolog of
Drosophila trithorax. Loss-of-function of the
ALL1 gene has been implicated in the development of human
acute leukemia associated with abnormalities at 11q23 (Croce, 1999
).
Pitx2 is expressed in normal human bone marrow and leukemic cell lines
with a normal ALL1 allele, but is not expressed in the
leukemic cell lines in which ALL1 is rearranged (Arakawa
et al., 1998
). It is, therefore, reasonable to speculate that Pitx2 is likely to be involved in the regulation of cell differentiation and cell proliferation.
As a transcription factor, Pitx2 should activate and/or repress the
transcription of its target genes to execute specific cellular
functions. Pitx2 has been shown to bind to consensus and nonconsensus
binding sites for bicoid-type homeodomain transcription factors and to
transactivate promoters containing bicoid-specific binding sites
(Amendt et al., 1998
, 1999
; Dave et al., 2000
;
Zhao et al., 2000
; Hjalt et al., 2001
). The
lysine residue (K) at amino acid 50 in the homeodomain of Pitx2 is
critical for its binding to the bicoid consensus site (TAATCC). In
contrast, bicoid-related homeodomain proteins with a glutamine (Q) at
position 50 in the homeodomain sequence will bind to a different
consensus site (TAATGG). There are three isoforms of Pitx2 (a, b, and
c) that result from alternative pre-mRNA splicing. Differential
function of the different Pitx2 isoforms during organogenesis has been
suggested recently in frogs (Schweickert et al., 2000
),
chickens (Yu et al., 2001
), and zebrafish (Essner et
al., 2000
). However, the exact cellular function of Pitx2 still
remains elusive.
Therefore, we initiated this project by asking what kinds of effects ectopic expression of Pitx2a in cultured HeLa cells would have on a number of important cellular functions, specifically actin-myosin cytoskeletal organization, cell motility, and cell proliferation. Our purpose was to trace the effects of Pitx2a on a cellular level in an effort to identify the various signal transduction mechanisms brought into play after its expression. HeLa cells that stably express mouse Pitx2a isoforms were generated by using the tetracycline-inducible expression system. We report herein that ectopic expression of Pitx2a in HeLa cells activates the Rho GTPase proteins Rac1 and RhoA, leading to marked changes in cell morphology, cell-cell contacts, cell motility, and the actin-myosin organization. We also demonstrate that the activation of the Rho GTPase proteins by Pitx2a requires phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase activity. In addition, ectopic expression of Pitx2a in HeLa cells leads to inhibition of cell proliferation and arrest of the cell cycle at G0/G1, most likely due to the accumulation of the gene products from the tumor suppressor gene p53 and its downstream target protein, p21. The overall effect is to convert this HeLa cell line into a stable line displaying a less malignant phenotype.
| |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Plasmids and Cell Culture
The mouse Pitx2a cDNA was amplified from embryonic day 12.5 total RNA derived from mouse head tissue by reverse
transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) (Gage and Camper,
1997
). The cDNA fragment was cloned into the
HindIII/BamHI sites of pTRE-GFP (Wei and
Adelstein, 2000
), generating pTRE-GFP-Pitx2a. The K50R and K50Q
variants of Pitx2a were generated using a QuikChange site-directed
mutagenesis kit (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA) according to the
manufacturer's instruction. All constructs were confirmed by
nucleotide sequencing. Myc-tagged L63RhoA, N19RhoA, V12Rac1, and
N17Rac1 were kindly provided by Dr. Alan Hall (University College,
London, England).
The HeLa Tet-On cells (CLONTECH, Palo Alto, CA) were cultured in DMEM supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS; Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) in the presence of geneticin (100 µg/ml; Invitrogen). The expression plasmids were transfected into HeLa Tet-On cells by using an Effectene transfection kit (QIAGEN, Valencia, CA) according to the manufacturer's instruction. The transgenes were induced to express by addition of 0.5 µg/ml doxycycline (Dox) (Sigma, St. Louis, MO). The transfected cells were selected in 200 µg/ml hygromycin B (Invitrogen) and 200 µg/ml geneticin (Invitrogen) for 10-14 d. The resulting colonies were screened by fluorescent microscopy, after the addition of Dox for 24 h. The colonies with strong fluorescence in the nucleus were transferred to the medium without Dox. The stable cell lines were maintained in DMEM supplemented with 10% FBS in the presence of hygromycin B (100 µg/ml; Invitrogen) and geneticin (100 µg/ml; Invitrogen). Y27632 (a gift from Dr. Masafumi Arita, Yoshitomi Pharmaceutical Industries, Iruma-shi, Japan), LY294002 (Upstate Biotechnology, Lake Placid, NY), and PD98059 (Upstate Biotechnology) were dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide and added to the culture at final concentrations indicated in the text
Immunofluorescence
Cells were grown on collagen-coated coverslips for the periods
of time indicated, fixed in 3.7% paraformaldehyde for 15 min, permeabilized in 0.5% Triton X-100 for 10 min, blocked in 1% bovine serum albumin (BSA) for 1 h at 23°C, incubated with primary
antibodies for 3 h at 23°C or overnight at 4°C, followed by
incubation with secondary antibodies for 1 h at 23°C.
Affinity-purified polyclonal rabbit antibodies against a
carboxyl-terminal sequence of nonmuscle myosin heavy chain II-A (NMHC
II-A; 1:1000) were previously described by Phillips et al.
(1995)
. Affinity-purified polyclonal rabbit antibodies against
phosphorylated myosin light chain (1:50) were a gift from Dr. Fumio
Matsumura (Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ). Monoclonal
antibodies to Myc (9E10; 1:500) and polyclonal antibodies to
-catenin (1:250) and hemagglutinin (HA) (1:200) were purchased from
Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Santa Cruz, CA). Monoclonal antibodies to
-catenin (1:500), N-cadherin (1:500), and E-cadherin (1:500) were
purchased from Zymed Laboratories (South San Francisco, CA). The
secondary antibodies Alexa 594 goat antimouse IgG (1:1000), Alexa 594 goat antirabbit IgG (1:1000), and Alexa 350 goat antimouse IgG (1:500)
were from Molecular Probes (Eugene, OR). Actin filaments were
visualized by incubation with rhodamine-phalloidin (1:1000;
Molecular Probes) for 1 h at 23°C. The coverslips were mounted
using a Prolong antifade kit (Molecular Probes). The images were
collected using a Zeiss LSM 510 confocal microscope (Carl Zeiss,
Thornwood, NY).
Immunoblot Analysis
Total cell proteins from different stable cell lines were
separated by SDS-6% or 4-20% PAGE, transferred to an Immobilon-P transfer membrane (Millipore, Bedford, MA), blocked with 5% nonfat milk for 1 h at 23°C, incubated with primary antibodies
overnight at 4°C, followed by incubation with horseradish
peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibodies (1:5000; Santa Cruz
Biotechnology) for 1 h at 23°C. The following primary antibodies
were used: affinity-purified polyclonal rabbit antibodies against human
Pitx2 (1:1000) as described by Hjalt et al. (2000)
;
polyclonal antibodies to green fluorescent protein (GFP) (1:1000;
CLONTECH); monoclonal antibodies to
-catenin (1:5000), N-cadherin
(1:5000), and E-cadherin (1:1000; Zymed Laboratories); polyclonal goat
antibodies to Trio (1:200) and monoclonal antibodies against p53
(1:1000) and RhoA (1:200; Santa Cruz Biotechnology); monoclonal
antibodies to p21 (1:1000) and Rac1 (1:1000; Upstate Biotechnology);
and monoclonal antibodies to
-tubulin (1:5000; Sigma). The blots
were visualized by Renaissance Western Blot, and Western Blot Plus
Chemiluminescence Reagent (PerkinElmer Life Sciences, Boston, MA).
Rac1 and RhoA Activity Assay
The stable cell lines were cultured with or without Dox for the periods of time as indicated, washed with phosphate-buffered saline, and then lysed in RIPA buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.4, 150 mM NaCl, 1% NP-40, 2.5% Na-deoxycholate, 1 mM EDTA, 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 1 µg/ml aprotinin, 1 µg/ml leupeptin, 1 µg/ml pepstatin, 1 mM Na3VO4, 1 mM NaF). The same amount of total protein from clarified lysate was incubated with GST-PBD (p21-binding domain of human PAK-1) or GST-RBD (Rho binding domain of rhotekin) to precipitate GTP-bound Rac1 and GTP-bound RhoA, respectively, according to the manufacturer's instructions (Upstate Biotechnology). Precipitated GTP-bound Rac1 or RhoA were resolved on a 4-20% SDS-PAGE and immunoblotted using monoclonal antibodies specific for Rac1 (1:1000; Upstate Biotechnology) and RhoA (1:200; Santa Cruz Biotechnology). Six percent of the cell lysate were also resolved in a 4-20% SDS-PAGE and immunoblotted to measure the total amount of Rac1 or RhoA.
Cell Migration Assay
Pitx2a cells were seeded in collagen-coated 60-mm dishes and cultured with or without Dox for 72 h. A wound was introduced in the central area of the confluent culture by using a pipette tip. The wound was incubated for a further 15 min or 12 h. The cells were fixed and stained with rhodamine-phalloidin to visualize actin filaments. Images were visualized with a Zeiss LSM 510 confocal microscope (Carl Zeiss) as well as with an Olympus 1X70 microscope with a 20× objective and digital images were obtained with WinView/32 software (Princeton Instruments, Trenton, NJ) and a PentaMax KDK-1400 charge-coupled device camera (Princeton Instruments).
Cell migration assays were also performed using a transwell Boyden chamber containing polycarbonate membrane inserts with 8-µm pores (Corning Glassworks, Corning, NY). The undersides of the membranes were either not coated or were coated with fibronectin (50 µg/ml) or collagen (100 µg/ml) for 3 h at 37°C and then blocked with 1% BSA in DMEM for 1 h at 37°C. Then 0.5 ml of 1% BSA was added to the lower chamber. For the uncoated inserts, 0.5 ml of DMEM with 10% FBS was added to the lower chamber. The Pitx2a cells cultured with or without Dox for 3 d were trypsinized, resuspended in DMEM with 1% BSA, and allowed to migrate to the undersides of the membranes for 4 h at 37°C. Membranes were fixed in 3.7% paraformaldehyde for 10 min. Cells remaining on the upper sides of the membranes were removed using a cotton swab. The migrating cells were stained with Coomassie Brilliant Blue G (Sigma) and counted.
Flow Cytometric Analysis
Flow cytometric analysis was carried out as previously described
(Zhang et al., 2001
). To arrest the cells in the G2-M phase, nocodazole (Sigma) was added to the culture at the final concentration of 0.3 µg/ml and incubated for a further 16 h and all the cells (including floating and attached cells) were collected for flow cytometric analysis.
| |
RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Overexpression of Pitx2a Results in Changes in Cell Morphology
To test the effects of overexpression of Pitx2a in HeLa cells with
respect to the actin-myosin cytoskeleton, we stably expressed mouse
Pitx2a-GFP fusion protein (both wild-type and mutants of Pitx2a; Figure
1A) by using a tetracycline-inducible
expression system that confers a high level of Pitx2a-GFP fusion
protein expression in the presence of Dox (Figure 1B). In the absence of Dox, extremely small amounts of protein were expressed with no
discernible effect. Figure 1C shows that these HeLa cells do not
express endogenous human Pitx2 (Figure 1C, lane 1) and that the
expression level of exogenous mouse Pitx2a in these cells was somewhat
higher than that of endogenous Pitx2a shown for the rat pituitary cell
line GH3, but was comparable (compare Figure 1C, lane 7, arrowhead,
with lane 6, arrow, middle gel). Overexpression of wild-type Pitx2a
(K50) in HeLa cells, in the presence of Dox, induced cell spreading and
the formation of organized cell-cell contacts (Figures 1Dd and 1Ef and
2A). In contrast, Pitx2a cells cultured
without Dox, like parental HeLa cells, showed unorganized cell-cell
contacts, less cell spreading (Figure 1Db and 1Ec), and cells grew to
overlap each other when they were plated at high density (our
unpublished data). A significant amount of Pitx2a protein began to be
detected by immunoblot analysis 8 h after addition of
Dox (Figure 1C, lane 3), but there was no obvious change in cell
spreading and cell morphology. By 24 h after Dox addition, high
levels of Pitx2a protein were detected by Western blot (Figure 1C, lane
4) and obvious cell spreading was observed (Figure 1Ed). By 48 and
72 h, the cells expressing Pitx2a continued to show cell membrane
protrusion and cell spreading until they made organized cell-cell
contacts (Figure 1Ee,f; see below). The effects of Dox were reversible.
After Dox was removed from the culture media, Pitx2a protein decreased
to background levels in 3 d and the phenotype induced by
overexpression of Pitx2a reverted to that of the parental HeLa cells in
6 d (our unpublished data).
|
|
It has been shown that the residue at position 50 of the homeodomain of
bicoid-related transcription factors is critical for differential DNA
binding (Hanes and Brent, 1989
; Treisman et al., 1989
, 1992
)
and this residue can either be a lysine (known as the K50 class, such
as Pitx2) or glutamine (known as the Q50 class, such as Ftz). We next
asked whether this lysine residue is required for induction of cell
spreading and the morphological changes shown herein after Pitx2a
expression in HeLa cells. The relevant lysine residue was mutated to
either arginine (K50R) or glutamine (K50Q) and stably expressed in HeLa
cells by using the tetracycline-inducible expression system (Figure 1,
A and B). The K50R and K50Q mutants did not cause changes in cell
spreading and morphology (Figures 1Df,h and 2Af,h), suggesting that the
cellular phenotype induced by overexpression of Pitx2a requires the
Pitx2a homeodomain with lysine at position 50.
Overexpression of Pitx2a Induces Actin-Myosin Cytoskeletal Reorganization
The dramatic change in cell morphology induced by the
overexpression of Pitx2a led us to analyze the actin-myosin
cytoskeletal system in greater detail. The parental HeLa Tet-On cells
are not enriched in actin stress fibers, but they have obvious cortical actin filaments, similar to those observed in cells cultured in the
absence of Dox (Figure 2Aa). Expression of Pitx2a in HeLa cells
increased actin filament formation (Figure 2Ab). We and others (Nobes
and Hall, 1995
; Schmidt et al., 1997
; Wei and Adelstein, 2000
) have previously shown that expression of dominant active RhoA
(L63RhoA) results in increased stress fiber formation. Therefore, it
was of interest to see whether inhibition of the Rho signaling network
would have an effect on the +Dox phenotype. Figure 2Ad shows that actin
filaments were significantly disrupted after treatment with 20 µM Rho
kinase inhibitor Y27632, suggesting that RhoA signaling was activated
in HeLa cells expressing Pitx2a. In contrast to the expression of
wild-type Pitx2a, expression of the K50R and K50Q mutant forms had no
obvious effect on the formation of actin stress fibers (compare Figure
2Af,h with 2Ab).
The HeLa cells used in this study only express NMHC II-A (or MYH9) and not NMHC II-B (or MYH10). Overexpression of Pitx2a does not change the expression level of endogenous NMHC II-A (our unpublished data), but significantly increases myosin filament formation (Figure 2Bb).
The Rho kinase inhibitor Y27632 also markedly inhibited formation
of myosin filaments induced by Pitx2a (Figure 2Bd), further confirming
the importance of RhoA in the induction of actin-myosin filament
formation by Pitx2a. Phosphorylation of the 20-kDa myosin light chain
(MLC20) through RhoA/Rho kinase signaling results in the formation of actin-myosin filaments (Van Aelst and
D'Souza-Schorey, 1997
; Kaibuchi et al., 1999
).
Immunofluorescence studies with an antibody specific for phosphorylated
serine-19 in MLC20 showed a similar pattern to
that of myosin II-A staining (compare Figure 2Bb with 2Cb), suggesting
that MLC20 is phosphorylated during actin-myosin
reorganization induced by the overexpression of Pitx2a. The filamentous
staining pattern of phosphorylated MLC20 was
markedly decreased after treatment with the Rho kinase inhibitor Y27632 (Figure 2Cd), indicating that RhoA/Rho kinase signaling is involved in
stress fiber formation induced by the overexpression of Pitx2a.
Overexpression of Pitx2a Activates the Rho GTPases Rac1 and RhoA
The ability of the Rho kinase inhibitor to decrease stress fiber
formation suggested that the Rho GTPases, including Rac1 and RhoA, may
play a role in regulating cell spreading and actin-myosin organization
(Ridley et al., 1992
; Nobes and Hall, 1995
; Van Aelst and
D'Souza-Schorey, 1997
; Clark et al., 1998
; Hall, 1998
;
Price et al., 1998
; van Leeuwen et al., 1999
;
Berrier et al., 2000
). We, therefore, investigated a
possible role for the Rho GTPases in the development of the phenotype
induced by overexpression of Pitx2a in HeLa cells. To assay the
endogenous Rac1 and RhoA activity in these cells, we performed a
GST-pulldown assay (see MATERIALS AND METHODS). Figure
3A shows that the activity of Rac1 and
RhoA was increased in cells cultured in the presence of Dox and that
expression of the K50R and K50Q mutants of Pitx2a had no effect on Rac1
and RhoA activity.
|
If the Rho GTPases are involved in the regulation of the cell phenotype induced by the expression of Pitx2a, dominant negative mutants of the Rho GTPases should be able to block the cell phenotype. Therefore, we transiently transfected Pitx2a cells with dominant negative mutants of the Rho GTPase proteins N17Rac1 and N19RhoA. The dominant negative Rac1 mutant N17Rac1 significantly inhibited cell spreading induced by Pitx2a (compare Figure 3Bf with 3Bl). Furthermore, the actin filaments in Pitx2a cells transfected with N17Rac1 and cultured in the presence of Dox (Figure 3Bl) were mainly cortical in location, similar to those in HeLa cells transfected with empty vector and cultured without Dox (compare Figure 3Bl with 3Bc). This suggests that the increased stress fiber formation in HeLa cells expressing Pitx2a (Figure 3Bf) might have resulted from the activation of RhoA by Rac1. In contrast, the dominant negative construct N19RhoA was not able to block cell spreading induced by Pitx2a (our unpublished data).
Previous work has shown that RhoA induces stress fiber formation
through activation of Rho kinase (Chrzanowska-Wodnicka and Burridge,
1996
; Kaibuchi et al., 1999
). Indeed, stress fiber formation induced by Pitx2a was blocked by the Rho kinase inhibitor Y27632 (Figure 2Ad and 2Bd). However, Y27632 did not significantly inhibit cell spreading induced by Pitx2a, further confirming that the activation of Rac1, but not RhoA, was critical for the cell spreading induced by Pitx2a. We, therefore, expressed a dominant active mutant of
Rac1 in these HeLa cells to see whether active Rac1 alone was capable
of inducing cell spreading in the absence of Pitx2a expression. Figure
3Cb and 3Db show that expression of dominant active Rac1 significantly
induces cell spreading in HeLa cells, further confirming the importance
of the activation of Rac1 signaling for cell spreading induced by the
expression of Pitx2a.
Cell Spreading Induced by Pitx2a Requires Activity of PI 3-Kinase
Phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K) has been
implicated in the regulation of the Rho GTPase activity and subsequent
modulation of the actin cytoskeletal organization (Reif et
al., 1996
; Rodriguez-Viciana et al., 1997
). Therefore,
we examined whether PI3K could act as an upstream signal for the Rho
GTPases involved in regulation of cell spreading and actin-myosin
cytoskeletal reorganization induced by Pitx2a. We used the PI3K
inhibitor LY294002 to test this possibility. HeLa cells transfected
with Pitx2a were cultured with Dox for 24 h and then switched to a
medium containing both 20 µM LY294002 and Dox for another 24 h.
As shown in Figure 4Af, LY294002
significantly inhibited cell spreading. In contrast, the
mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase-1 (MEK1) inhibitors 20 µM
PD98059 and 10 µM U0126 had no significant effect on cell spreading
induced by Pitx2a (Figure 4Ah; our unpublished data). Furthermore, the
formation of actin-myosin filaments induced by Pitx2a was also
inhibited by LY294002 (compare Figures 4Bb,d with 2Ab and 2Bb).
|
To substantiate a role for PI3K after Pitx2a expression, we used a GST-pulldown assay to detect a change in Rac1 activity after treatment of HeLa cells with Dox in the presence and absence of the PI3K inhibitor. As shown in Figure 4C, the PI3K inhibitor LY294002, but not the MEK1 inhibitor PD98059, significantly inhibited the activation of Rac1 by Pitx2a, confirming that the increase in GTP-Rac1 activity after Pitx2a expression was mediated by PI3K.
Cadherin-mediated Cell-Cell Contacts Are Induced by Overexpression of Pitx2a
In addition to cell spreading, the most striking phenotype induced
by Pitx2a expression was organized cell-cell interactions. HeLa Tet-On
cells do not express E-cadherin, but do express N-cadherin, P-cadherin,
-catenin,
-catenin, and
-catenin (Figure
5A; our unpublished data). Of these
molecules, only
-catenin and N-cadherin were up-regulated by
overexpression of Pitx2a (Figure 5A). As shown, both proteins localized
to the sites of cell-cell contacts (Figure 5Bb,e). This cell-cell
interaction is calcium-dependent because depletion of calcium in the
media with EGTA led to diffuse distribution of
-catenin and
N-cadherin in the cytoplasm (Figure 5Bc,f). P-Cadherin was also
localized to the sites of cell-cell contacts (our unpublished data).
Overexpression of the K50R mutant of Pitx2a did not up-regulate the
expression of
-catenin and N-cadherin (Figure 5A) and did not alter
the distribution of
-catenin and N-cadherin (our unpublished data).
|
Because Rac1 and RhoA have been implicated in the regulation of the
formation of cell-cell contacts (Braga et al., 1997
;
Takaishi et al., 1997
; Jou et al., 1998
; Jou and
Nelson, 1998
; Stoffler et al., 1998
), we investigated the
role of Rho GTPase proteins in Pitx2a-induced cell-cell contacts.
Expression of the dominant active Rac1 mutant (V12Rac1), but not the
dominant active RhoA mutant (L63RhoA), was sufficient for
-catenin
to localize to the sites of cell-cell contacts in these HeLa cells
(Figure 5Cb,d). However, staining for
-catenin at the sites of
cell-cell contacts in Pitx2a-expressing cells was more pronounced
(compare Figure 5Bb with 5Cb), consistent with our results that
-catenin and N-cadherin are up-regulated by Pitx2a (Figure 5A). As
expected, expression of the dominant negative Rac1 mutant (N17Rac1)
inhibited localization of
-catenin to the sites of cell-cell
contacts (Figure 5Dc). However, the dominant negative RhoA mutant
(N19RhoA) did not significantly change the distribution of
-catenin
(Figure 5Df).
Overexpression of Pitx2a Results in Inhibition of Cell Movement
The Rho GTPase proteins have been shown to be implicated in the
regulation of cell motility by modulating the actin-myosin cytoskeleton
(Hordijk et al., 1997
; Keely et al., 1997
; Nobes and Hall, 1999
; Evers et al., 2000
). As demonstrated above,
because the Rho GTPase proteins were activated by the expression of
Pitx2a, we performed wound-healing assays to test whether
overexpression of Pitx2a in HeLa cells has any effect on cell motility.
After HeLa cells were cultured with or without Dox for 3 d, a
wound was introduced using a pipette tip and wound healing was observed for 12 h. HeLa cells, when cultured without Dox, were able to move
to the center of the wound (Figure
6Aa,b). In contrast, Pitx2a-expressing cells did not move to the center of the wound by 12 h (Figure 6Ac,d). These results indicated that overexpression of Pitx2a inhibited
cell movement. In addition, the ability of cells to migrate toward
fibronectin, collagen, or serum was also evaluated using a transwell
Boyden chamber. As quantitated in Figure 6B, cell movement toward
fibronectin (f) or serum (s) was inhibited by overexpression of Pitx2a
(+Dox) compared with HeLa cells that were not expressing Pitx2a
(
Dox). There was less of a difference in cell movement toward
collagen (c).
|
To gain insight into the mechanism by which cell motility was affected
by expression of Pitx2a, Pitx2a-expressing cells were trypsinized and
replated on a fibronectin surface in a serum-free medium after being
cultured with or without Dox for 3 d. Two hours after replating,
cells cultured with Dox began to show more cell spreading (Figure 6Ce).
By 12 h, there was not only a significant difference in cell
spreading between cells cultured with or without Dox, but there was
also an obvious difference in cell morphology. Cells cultured with Dox
show cell membrane protrusion in every direction around the cells and
the cells are not polarized (Figure 6Cf). In contrast, cells cultured
without Dox are less spread and are polarized (Figure 6Cc), indicating
that the cells were more motile than those cultured with Dox. In
addition, the cells cultured with Dox show more actin filaments (Figure
6Ce), consistent with the idea that cells became stationary upon the
bundling of actin-myosin filaments (Chrzanowska-Wodnicka and Burridge,
1996
; Burridge, 1999
).
Previous work has shown that Rac1/Cdc42 activity increased cell
migration in a number of cell lines, such as rat embryonic fibroblast
and T47D cells (Keely et al., 1997
; Nobes and Hall, 1999
). In contrast, there is also evidence demonstrating that activation of Rac1 suppresses epithelial cell migration (Hordijk et al., 1997
; Sander et al., 1999
). Our results
show that overexpression of Pitx2a in these HeLa cells resulted in
activation of Rac1, leading to changes in cell spreading and cell
morphology as well as inhibition of cell motility. As demonstrated in
Figure 3, C and D, expression of a dominant active Rac1 mutant
(V12Rac1) in these cells led to the loss of a polarized morphology,
indicating that cell migration might be affected by Rac1 in HeLa cells.
Therefore, a wound-healing assay was performed to test this
possibility. As shown in Figure 6D, expression of dominant active
V12Rac1 alone (in the absence of Pitx2a) significantly inhibits cell
migration. Of note is that the cells that did move to the center of the
wound were polarized and did not express V12Rac1 (Figure 6Dd). In
contrast, cells expressing V12Rac1, similar to cells expressing Pitx2a, were not polarized and did not move to the center of the wound (compare
Figure 6Dd with 6Ad).
Increased Expression of a Guanine Nucleotide Exchange Factor, Trio, by Pitx2a
The guanine nucleotide exchange factors (GEFs) have been shown to
be major activators of the Rho GTPases Rac1 and RhoA (Van Aelst and
D'Souza-Schorey, 1997
; Hall, 1998
). Therefore, several GEFs were
screened by RT-PCR to check their expression level in Pitx2a cells
after the addition of Dox. One of them, Trio, was found to be
up-regulated by overexpression of Pitx2a. Trio contains two GEF
domains, GEF-D1 and GEF-D2, which can activate Rac1 and RhoA,
respectively (Debant et al., 1996
). Trio mRNA was increased approximately twofold at least 8 h after addition of Dox (Figure 7, A and B), suggesting that Trio might
be directly induced by Pitx2a. The RT-PCR product was confirmed to be
Trio by nucleotide sequencing. Interestingly, Trio protein begins to be
down-regulated after 48 h in the presence of Dox and almost
disappears after 72 h in the presence of Dox (Figure 7C). The
beginning of the Trio down-regulation is coincident with the changes in
cell morphology induced by Pitx2a, suggesting that the Pitx2a-induced
cell phenotype can initiate a negative feedback loop to down-regulate
expression of Trio protein.
|
To further confirm the involvement of Trio in the induction of the cell
phenotype, HeLa Tet-On cells were transfected with plasmids encoding
TrioGEF1 or TrioGEF2, which have GEF activity toward Rac1 and RhoA,
respectively (Bellanger et al., 1998
, 2000
; Blangy et
al., 2000
). Expression of TrioGEF1, but not TrioGEF2, induced
similar cell morphological changes to those seen after Pitx2a
expression, as shown in Figure 7, D and E. In addition, expression of
TrioGEF1 also induced the formation of cell-cell contacts and
accumulation of
-catenin to the sites of cell-cell interactions
(Figure 7F).
Overexpression of Pitx2a Leads to Inhibition of Cell Proliferation and Cell Cycle Progression
Pitx2 has also been isolated as a downstream target for the human
acute leukemia ALL1 gene (Arakawa et al., 1998
),
indicating that Pitx2 might be involved in the regulation of cell
proliferation and/or differentiation. Therefore, we also investigated
whether overexpression of Pitx2a in HeLa cells has an effect on cell
proliferation. Treatment of K50-transfected cells with Dox for 3 d
inhibited cell proliferation by >50% (Figure
8A). In contrast, expression of K50R or
K50Q Pitx2a mutants did not have a significant effect on cell
proliferation (our unpublished data). Analysis of the cell cycle by
flow cytometry shows that after 2-d culture in the presence of Dox,
~76% of the cells were in G0/G1 (Figure 8Bc), compared with 49% of
the cells that were untreated (Figure 8Ba). This suggests that
overexpression of Pitx2a in HeLa cells induces an arrest of the cell
cycle at G0/G1. To confirm this finding, the cells were treated with
nocodazole for 16 h, to arrest the cells in the G2-M phase after
being cultured for 24 h in the presence or absence of Dox and then
the cells were analyzed by flow cytometry. Whereas 96% of the
untreated HeLa cells (i.e., without Dox, but treated with nocodazole)
arrested in G2-M (Figure 8Bd), only 30% of the Dox-treated cells
arrested at this step (Figure 8Be). This result strongly suggests that
overexpression of Pitx2a causes cells to arrest at G0/G1. These effects
were also reversible as flow cytometric analysis showed that the cell
cycle profile reverts to normal 6 d after removal of Dox and
trypan blue staining confirmed that these cells were still viable (our
unpublished data).
|
To understand the mechanism responsible for cell cycle arrest induced
by the overexpression of Pitx2a, we used antibodies specific for some
of the cell cycle regulatory proteins to quantitate their expression.
We found that p53 protein accumulated in HeLa cells overexpressing
Pitx2a (Figure 8C). p21 was also up-regulated by Pitx2a in these cells,
consistent with previous evidence that p21 is a downstream target for
p53 and is transcriptionally activated by p53 (Levine, 1997
). In
contrast, neither the K50R nor K50Q mutants of Pitx2a was capable of
inducing the accumulation of p53 and p21 proteins (Figure 8C). These
results are also consistent with previous reports demonstrating that
accumulation of the p53 and p21 proteins is able to arrest the cell
cycle at G1 (Levine, 1997
).
Because cell cycle arrest at G0/G1 is known to cause many secondary
consequences, we therefore asked whether G0/G1 arrest, induced by means
other than Pitx2a, is able to generate phenotypic changes similar to
those induced by the expression of Pitx2a in HeLa cells. When HeLa
Tet-On cells were arrested at G0/G1 by serum starvation or
dexamethasone treatment for 24 or 36 h, we did not observe the
increased cell spreading and morphological changes seen in Pitx2a cells
cultured with Dox (Figure 9B). However,
both serum starvation and dexamethasone treatment significantly
inhibited cell migration in a wound-healing assay, as shown in Figure
9A. These results suggest that the decrease in cell migration we
observed in HeLa cells may be a less specific consequence due to G0/G1 arrest, although Pitx2a may also play a role. On the other hand, the
changes in cell morphology and cell-cell interaction appear to be a
more specific consequence of Pitx2a expression.
|
| |
DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The Rho GTPase proteins, including RhoA, Rac1, and Cdc42, play an
essential role in the regulation of the actin-myosin cytoskeleton organization, which, in turn, defines cell morphology, cell-cell interaction, and cell migration (Van Aelst and D'Souza-Schorey, 1997
;
Hall, 1998
; Kaibuchi et al., 1999
; Evers et al.,
2000
). RhoA induces the phosphorylation of myosin light chains by
activating its downstream effector Rho kinase, leading to the formation
of stress fibers. Rac1 regulates lamellipodium formation and membrane ruffling. Cdc42 mediates filopodium formation. High Rac1 activity in
cells leads to an epithelial-like morphology, whereas high RhoA
activity is involved in maintaining a fibroblast-like morphology (Sander et al., 1999
; Evers et al., 2000
; Zondag
et al., 2000
). Using a culture cell system, we provide
evidence showing that the bicoid-type homeodomain transcription factor
Pitx2a is capable of activating the Rho GTPase proteins, leading to
marked changes in cell morphology and cell migration. Although both
Rac1 and RhoA are activated in HeLa cells expressing Pitx2a, our
results indicate that it is the activation of Rac1 that is essential
for the phenotypic changes. Activation of RhoA and the induction of stress fiber formation are most likely secondary to the activation of
Rac1, consistent with previous reports with Swiss 3T3 cells, in
which expression of active Rac1 resulted in the activation of RhoA and
the formation of stress fibers (Nobes and Hall, 1995
). In contrast,
there is also evidence demonstrating that Rac1 can down-regulate the
activity of RhoA in NIH3T3 cells and still induce an epithelial-like
morphology and suppress cell migration (Sander et al.,
1999
). It is likely that Rac1 activity is dominant over RhoA activity
in HeLa cells expressing Pitx2a, because expression of the dominant
active form of Rac1 (V12Rac1) alone inhibited HeLa cell migration and
resulted in an epithelial-like morphology. Consistent with this
argument, expression of a constitutively activated form of RhoA
(L63RhoA) induced formation of thick actin filaments and blocked the
cell spreading induced by Pitx2a in HeLa cells (our unpublished data).
These results are in agreement with the notion that the balance between
the activities of Rac1 and RhoA is critical for determining cell
morphology (Sander et al., 1999
; Zondag et al.,
2000
).
In addition to the induction of Rho GTPase protein activation, Pitx2a
also causes accumulation of p53 and p21 proteins, leading to cell cycle
arrest and the inhibition of cell proliferation in HeLa cells. Like
most of the cervical carcinoma cell lines, HeLa cells carry wild-type
p53 and Rb genes. However, the expression of E6 and E7 proteins from
high-risk human papillomaviruses, which are integrated in the genomes
of HeLa cells, leads to the ubiquitination and degradation of p53 and
Rb proteins (Villa, 1997
; Thomas et al., 1999
; Francis
et al., 2000
; Goodwin and DiMaio, 2000
; Hietanen et
al., 2000
). Therefore, there is only a very low level of p53 and
Rb protein in HeLa cells. The accumulation of p53 protein induced by
Pitx2a is most likely due to increased protein stability and Pitx2a
probably does not affect the transcription of p53, because p53 mRNA
levels were unchanged (our unpublished data). Cell cycle arrest is a
hallmark biological function of p53 in response to DNA damage or
oncogenic activation, suggesting that the accumulated p53 protein in
these HeLa cells, induced by Pitx2a, is responsible for inhibiting cell
cycle progression. p21 has been shown to be directly up-regulated by
p53 and to mediate cell cycle arrest induced by p53 (Levine, 1997
).
Therefore, it is likely that the up-regulation of p21 we observed is
due to the accumulation of p53 protein. However, we cannot rule out the
possibility that p21 was up-regulated by other signaling pathways, too.
How does Pitx2a induce the activation of the Rho GTPase proteins and
cause the accumulation of p53 and p21 proteins? Our data indicate that
PI3K activity is necessary for the activation of Rac1 by Pitx2a,
leading to changes in cell morphology and actin cytoskeleton
organization. Evidence suggests that PI3K plays an important role in
regulating activity of GEFs, such as Vav, Sos-1, and Tiam1, which, in
turn, activate Rac1 (Han et al., 1998
; Sander et
al., 1998
; Bar-Sagi and Hall, 2000
; Bustelo, 2000
). However, PI3K
is not required for the accumulation of the p53 protein because p53
accumulation was not blocked by the inhibitor LY294002 (our unpublished
data). Interestingly, up-regulation of p21 was blocked by LY294002 (our
unpublished data), suggesting that PI3K may play a role in the
regulation of p21 expression induced by Pitx2a. Another plausible
upstream component is Ras, because Ras signaling has been shown not
only to induce the accumulation of the p53 protein but also to activate
Rac1 signaling (Levine, 1997
; Sherr, 1998
; Bar-Sagi and Hall, 2000
;
Scita et al., 2000
). However, endogenous Ras activity did
not increase and the MEK1 inhibitor PD98059 did not block the
accumulation of p53 and p21 proteins (our unpublished data), suggesting
that Ras signaling is not involved in the activation of Rac signaling
and the accumulation of p53 and p21 induced by Pitx2a. We presently do
not know how Pitx2a induces the accumulation of p53 and p21.
As potent regulators of the actin cytoskeleton organization, which, in
turn, defines cell morphology and cell migration, Rho GTPases have been
implicated as mediators of tissue morphogenesis during embryonic
development of Drosophila and Xenopus (Magie et al., 1999
; Wunnenberg-Stapleton et al., 1999
;
Settleman, 2000
). The activities of the Rho GTPases were regulated by
the following three signaling components: 1) GEFs, which catalyze the
exchange of GDP for GTP and activate the Rho GTPases; 2)
GTPase-activating proteins, which catalyze the hydrolysis of GTP to GDP
and inactivate the Rho GTPases; and 3) guanine nucleotide dissociation
inhibitors, which can inhibit both the exchange of GTP and the
hydrolysis of bound GTP. More than 20 members of GEFs have been
isolated and among these GEFs, Tiam-1 and Vav drew our attention.
Expression of Tiam-1 in epithelial cells activates Rac1 and suppresses
cell migration (Hordijk et al., 1997
). Vav can activate both
Rac1 and RhoA and the expression of Vav induces actin cytoskeleton
reorganization (Han et al., 1998
; Liu and Burridge, 2000
).
The biological functions of both Tiam-1 and Vav require PI3K activity
(Han et al., 1998
; Sander et al., 1998
). However,
the expression level of Tiam-1 and Vav did not change after addition of
Dox (our unpublished data), suggesting that Tiam-1 and Vav might not be
involved in the activation of Rac1 induced by Pitx2a. On the other
hand, Trio, another member of the GEFs, was up-regulated by Pitx2a.
Both Trio mRNA and protein increased as early as 8 h after
addition of Dox, suggesting that the induction of Trio was most likely
due to direct transactivation by Pitx2a. Of note, the expression of
Trio protein gradually decreased 48 h after addition of Dox and
almost disappeared after 72 h in the presence of Dox, suggesting
that a negative feedback loop was generated to suppress the expression
of Trio protein after the development of cell phenotype. The importance of Trio homologs in Drosophila and Caenorhabditis
elegans has been well documented. UNC-73, the C. elegans homolog of Trio, has been demonstrated to be important for
cell migration and exon guidance, acting cell autonomously to regulate
actin dynamics during cell and growth cone migration (Steven et
al., 1998
). More recently, UNC-73/Trio was shown to participate in
a signaling system that orients and polarizes the migrating neuroblast
in a left/right asymmetrical manner during development in C. elegans (Honigberg and Kenyon, 2000
). Trio-deficient mouse embryos
showed abnormal development of skeletal muscles as well as aberrant
organization in several regions within the brain (O'Brien et
al., 2000
). Ectopic expression of Trio in cultured cells activates
the Rho GTPases Rac1 and RhoA, leading to changes in actin cytoskeletal
organization, cell migration and cell growth (Bellanger et
al., 1998
, 2000
; Blangy et al., 2000
).
The importance of Pitx2 during organogenesis, especially of
ocular, pituitary, tooth, and heart tissue, has been well documented. The data described in this article suggest that ectopic expression of
Pitx2a in cultured HeLa cells is capable of modulating both the Rac1
and p53 pathways, leading to major changes in cell morphology and the
inhibition of cell cycle progression. These results indicate that the
transcriptional activity of Pitx2a is capable of initiating nucleus-to-cytoplasm signals that have a profound effect on cell shape,
migration, and proliferation. It has been reported that the nuclear
protein Rb can influence Ras activity in both mammalian cells and
nematodes (Lu and Horvitz, 1998
; Lee et al., 1999
). Recently, Eid et al. (2000)
reported that complexes
containing p300 and the nuclear oncoprotein SYT induced
nucleus-to-cytoplasm signals that promote cell adhesion to a
fibronectin matrix. The transcription factor Snail can act as a
repressor of E-cadherin gene expression, inducing an
epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition in Madin-Darby canine kidney cells
(Batlle et al., 2000
; Cano et al., 2000
).
Therefore, nucleus-to-cytoplasm signal transduction plays an important
role in regulating cell morphology and cell proliferation. These
findings represent the first steps on a cellular level toward an
understanding of how Pitx2a might regulate organogenesis in vertebrates.
| |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
We thank Dr. Christian A. Combs (National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Light Microscopy Facility) for help and advice on the use of the confocal microscope, Dr. Shuling Zhang (National Cancer Institute) for help with flow cytometry, Drs. T.A. Hjalt and J.C. Murray for antibodies to Pitx2, Dr. A. Blangy for providing plasmids expressing TrioGEF1 and TrioGEF2, members of the Laboratory of Molecular Cardiology for useful discussions and criticisms, and Catherine S. Magruder for editorial assistance.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
Online version of this article contains video material.
Online version is available at www.molbiolcell.org.
* Corresponding author. E-mail address: adelster{at}nhlbi.nih.gov.
Article published online ahead of print. Mol. Biol. Cell 10.1091/mbc.01-07-0358. Article and publication date are at www.molbiolcell.org/cgi/10.1091/mbc.01-07-0358.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
Y. Zhou, G. Cheng, L. Dieter, T. A. Hjalt, F. H. Andrade, J. S. Stahl, and H. J. Kaminski An Altered Phenotype in a Conditional Knockout of Pitx2 in Extraocular Muscle Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., October 1, 2009; 50(10): 4531 - 4541. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Rodriguez-Leon, C. R. Esteban, M. Marti, B. Santiago-Josefat, I. Dubova, X. Rubiralta, and J. C. I. Belmonte Pitx2 regulates gonad morphogenesis PNAS, August 12, 2008; 105(32): 11242 - 11247. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Bake, L. Ma, and F. Sohrabji Estrogen Receptor-{alpha} Overexpression Suppresses 17{beta}-Estradiol-Mediated Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Expression and Activation of Survival Kinases Endocrinology, August 1, 2008; 149(8): 3881 - 3889. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Tessari, M. Pietrobon, A. Notte, G. Cifelli, P. J. Gage, M. D. Schneider, G. Lembo, and M. Campione Myocardial Pitx2 Differentially Regulates the Left Atrial Identity and Ventricular Asymmetric Remodeling Programs Circ. Res., April 11, 2008; 102(7): 813 - 822. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Galli, J. N. Dominguez, S. Zaffran, A. Munk, N. A. Brown, and M. E. Buckingham Atrial myocardium derives from the posterior region of the second heart field, which acquires left-right identity as Pitx2c is expressed Development, March 15, 2008; 135(6): 1157 - 1167. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Nowotschin, J. Liao, P. J. Gage, J. A. Epstein, M. Campione, and B. E. Morrow Tbx1 affects asymmetric cardiac morphogenesis by regulating Pitx2 in the secondary heart field Development, April 15, 2006; 133(8): 1565 - 1573. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Kieusseian, J. Chagraoui, C. Kerdudo, P.-E. Mangeot, P. J. Gage, N. Navarro, B. Izac, G. Uzan, B. G. Forget, and A. Dubart-Kupperschmitt Expression of Pitx2 in stromal cells is required for normal hematopoiesis Blood, January 15, 2006; 107(2): 492 - 500. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Q. Wei Pitx2a Binds to Human Papillomavirus Type 18 E6 Protein and Inhibits E6-mediated P53 Degradation in HeLa Cells J. Biol. Chem., November 11, 2005; 280(45): 37790 - 37797. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Holmberg, C.-Y. Liu, and T. A. Hjalt PITX2 Gain-of-Function in Rieger Syndrome Eye Model Am. J. Pathol., November 1, 2004; 165(5): 1633 - 1641. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. A. Lines, K. Kozlowski, S. C. Kulak, R. R. Allingham, E. Heon, R. Ritch, A. V. Levin, M. B. Shields, K. F. Damji, A. Newlin, et al. Characterization and Prevalence of PITX2 Microdeletions and Mutations in Axenfeld-Rieger Malformations Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., March 1, 2004; 45(3): 828 - 833. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. Liu, J. Selever, M.-F. Lu, and J. F. Martin Genetic dissection of Pitx2 in craniofacial development uncovers new functions in branchial arch morphogenesis, late aspects of tooth morphogenesis and cell migration Development, December 22, 2003; 130(25): 6375 - 6385. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Wen, T. C. Caffrey, M. J. Wheelock, K. R. Johnson, and M. A. Hollingsworth Nuclear Association of the Cytoplasmic Tail of MUC1 and {beta}-Catenin J. Biol. Chem., September 26, 2003; 278(39): 38029 - 38039. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. R. Mercatante, J. L. Mohler, and R. Kole Cellular Response to an Antisense-mediated Shift of Bcl-x Pre-mRNA Splicing and Antineoplastic Agents J. Biol. Chem., December 13, 2002; 277(51): 49374 - 49382. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||