|
|
|
|
Vol. 14, Issue 5, 2029-2040, May 2003
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||



* Max-Planck-Institut für Biologie, Abteilung Membranbiochemie, D-72076
Tübingen, Germany;
Ludwigs-Maximilians-Universität München, Department Biologie I,
Bereich Genetik, D-80638 München, Germany;
Max-Planck-Institut für Entwicklungsbiologie, D-72076 Tübingen,
Germany;
Zentrum für Molekularbiologie der Pflanzen, Universität
Tübingen, D-72076 Tübingen, Germany; and
|| Wellcome Trust Laboratories for Molecular Parasitology, Imperial College
London, Department of Biological Sciences and Centre for Molecular
Microbiology and Infection, London, SW7 2AY, United Kingdom
Submitted October 10, 2002; Revised December 3, 2002; Monitoring Editor: Jennifer-Lippincott-Schwartz
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
We are interested in the cellular sorting of glycosylphosphatidylinositol
(GPI)-anchored proteins, a class of cell surface proteins thought to occur in
all eukaryotic cells, but studied mainly in mammalian cells, yeast, and
kinetoplastid protozoa (McConville and
Ferguson, 1993
; Ferguson,
1999
; Chatterjee and Mayor,
2001
). The phosphatidylinositol residue confers on these proteins
properties of "big lipids," whereas the protein moiety allows for
their ready detection by immunochemical techniques and, in some cases, by
their enzymatic or ligand-binding properties. Therefore, these proteins have
become popular for studies on cellular sorting, and depending on the cell type
and the membrane compartments investigated, both positive and negative sorting
scenarios have been proposed (Bretscher
et al., 1980
; Bamezai
et al., 1992
; Keller
et al., 1992
; Simons
and Ikonen, 1997
; Harder
et al., 1998
;
Muñiz et al.,
2001
; Sabharanjak et
al., 2002
).
We have chosen the mammalian stage of the parasitic protozoan
Trypanosoma brucei (see Figure
1 for relevant ultrastructural features of the organism), as a
model for the sorting of GPI-anchored proteins for three reasons. First, this
and related flagellates abundantly express GPI-anchored proteins. T.
brucei is covered by a dense coat of the GPI-anchored variant surface
glycoprotein (VSG), which comprises 10% of the total cellular protein
(Overath et al.,
1994
; Cross, 1996
).
Sorting is effective, because the concentration of VSG at the cell surface is
50 times higher than in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER)
(Grünfelder et al.,
2002
), where the protein is synthesized and the lipid anchor is
attached. The concentration in membranes of the Golgi complex and of endosomes
is 2.7 and 10.8 times higher than in membranes of the ER, respectively. Thus,
the ratio of the VSG concentration at the cell surface to the average
concentration on endosomal membranes seems to be 4.7. The second reason for
using T. brucei is the highly compact and polarized arrangement of
its structures involved in endo- and exocytosis. Macromolecular nutrient
uptake as well as secretion is restricted to the flagellar pocket membrane, an
invagination of the plasma membrane surrounding the emerging flagellum at the
posterior end of the cell. Endosomes are exclusively located between the
flagellar pocket and the nucleus forming a prominent and in part continuous
system of cisternal/tubulovesicular structures. In addition, this region
harbors the single Golgi apparatus and the lysosome(s)
(Overath et al.,
1997
; Field et al.,
2000
; Weise et al.,
2000
; Landfear and
Ignatushchenko, 2001
;
McConville et al.,
2002b
). Third, the equivalent of the membrane area of the
flagellar pocket is internalized every 2 min
(Coppens et al.,
1987
). This observation suggests that VSG is rapidly endocytosed
and recycled (Seyfang et al.,
1990
) and implies effective sorting in the endosomal system.
|
In this study, we focus on membrane structures involved in uptake and
recycling of VSG in T. brucei. We show that VSG enters trypanosomes
at the flagellar pocket in clathrincoated vesicles and then associates with
endosomes. VSG seems to be concentrated by default in cisternal endosomes by
budding of a distinct class of clathrin-coated pits (CCPs) and vesicles, which
are depleted in VSG. The cisternal endosomes give rise to VSG-rich,
TbRAB11-positive exocytic carriers, which fuse with the flagellar pocket
membrane. The results are discussed in comparison to sorting and membrane
recycling of GPI-anchored proteins in mammalian cells, in which exocytic
carriers recycling from endosomes to the plasma membrane have so far not been
characterized (Sönnichsen et
al., 2000
).
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Image acquisition was performed with a motorized Axiophot2 widefield
microscope equipped with a 63x/1.4 numerical aperture oil DIC objective
(both from Carl Zeiss, Thornwood, NY), a 2.5x optovar, and the CoolSnap
HQ cooled (30°C) charge-coupled device camera (Sony ICX285
interline, progressive-scan charge-couple device). For acquisition of
three-dimensional (3D)-images, a PIFOC objective z-stepper was driven by the
piezo-amplifier E662 LVPZT (Physik Instrumente, Karlsruhe, Germany). The
microscopic setup was integrated and controlled using the scripting features
of the IPLab for Macintosh software (version 3.5; Scanalytics, Fairfax, VA;
for details, see
http://www.scanalytics.com/).
3D images were acquired using the optimal sampling density derived from the
optical setup and the respective fluorophor (z-step size
50 x 100
nm). The point spread function of the microscope was measured using
fluorescent 0.17-µm microspheres (PS-Speck microscope point source kit;
Molecular Probes). After image acquisition, the raw data were exported to the
Huygens System software (version 2.1.8; Scientific Volume Imaging, B.V.,
Hilversum, The Netherlands; for details, see
http://www.svi.nl/),
and digital deconvolution was performed using the "maximum likelihood
estimation" algorithm (>80 iterations). The restored image data set
was visualized and analyzed with the Imaris software package, featuring the
Full 3D and Surpass modules (version 3.1 for IRIX; Bitplane AG, Zurich,
Switzerland (for details, see
http://www.bitplane.ch/products/imaris/and
http://www.bitplane.ch/products/imarissurpass/).
For animated presentation of 3D data, AMCA-stained cell surfaces were
processed using the nonlinear morphological gradient filter implemented in the
IPLab software. In this way a 3 x 3 eroded version of the (blue) AMCA
channel was created and merged with the nonprocessed red and green channels,
allowing visualization through the cell surface of endocytosed VSG and TbRAB11
or clathrin heavy chain, respectively. Colocalization analysis of multichannel
3D data series was performed with the colocalization software (version 1.0 for
IRIX; Bitplane AG; for details, see
http://www.bitplane.ch/products/colocalization/).
Immunoelectron Microscopy
Logarithmically growing trypanosomes of variant MITat 1.2 were either
cryoimmobilized by high-pressure freezing as described previously
(Grünfelder et al.,
2002
) or chemically fixed for Tokuyasu cryosectioning. Cryo-fixed
cells were freeze substituted in 0.5% glutaraldehyde + 0.5% osmium tetroxide
(OsO4) in acetone from 90 to 40°C for 39 h
(Figure 3A) or in 0.5%
OsO4 in acetone from 90°C to 40°C for 36 h,
followed by 0.25% OsO4 and 0.25% gallic acid in acetone for 30 h at
40°C (Figure 3D).
After washing with acetone, cells were embedded in Epon.
|
For cryosectioning, chemical fixation was performed in suspension for 35 min at room temperature, followed by 1.52 h on ice by using final concentrations of 4% formaldehyde in 0.1 M HEPES (pH 7.2) or 2% formaldehyde in 0.1 M HEPES supplemented with 0.05% glutaraldehyde. After fixation, cells were centrifuged, embedded in 1 or 2% low melting temperature agarose (SeaPlaque, Rockland, ME) in PBS, cut into small blocks, washed twice in PBS, and infiltrated with 20% polyvinylpyrrolidone/1.8 M sucrose in 0.1 M Na2HPO4. Specimen blocks were mounted on copper stubs, frozen in liquid nitrogen and trimmed and sectioned (at 6070 nm) with a Leica Ultracut S/FCS cryo-ultramicrotome. The grids with the thawed cryosections were floated on ice cold PBS for storage before immunolabeling.
Immunolabeling of ultrathin Epon- and cryosections was performed according
to standard protocols (Stierhof et
al., 1999
). The following antibodies were used: rabbit
anti-VSG MITat 1.2 antiserum (1:70;
Grünfelder et al.,
2002
), rabbit antibodies against T. brucei clathrin heavy
chain (1:50), TbRAB11A (1:70), and biotin (affinity purified; 1:100; Loxo,
Dossenheim, Germany). In single labeling, the primary antibodies were detected
by 6 or 15 nm Protein A gold complexes (PAG-6 and PAG-15). For double labeling
(Figures 3E, inset;
5, DF), the first
antibody was generally detected by PAG-10 or PAG-6; after a block with a
rabbit normal IgG (1:400), the second antibody was detected by PAG-10 or
PAG-15. In one case (Figure 3
E, inset), clathrin was first labeled with rabbit anti-TbCLH
antibodies and PAG-6, whereas VSG was subsequently detected using biotinylated
rabbit anti-VSG IgG followed by a monoclonal mouse antibiotin antibody (1:100;
Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA) and goat anti-mouse IgG-18-nm gold
conjugates (1:20; Jackson Immunoresearch Laboratories, West Grove, PA). After
labeling, the cryosections were embedded in 1.4% methylcellulose, 0.3% uranyl
acetate. Sections were analyzed in Philips CM10 and Philips 201 electron
microscopes at 60 kV. Images were reproduced on baryt papers (final
magnification, 80- to 100,000-fold), scanned at 300 dpi resolution, and
digitally arranged to the plates by using the Color Photopaint program,
version 10.
|
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Distribution of Clathrin and Endocytosed VSG
An overview of the intracellular distribution of clathrin in comparison
with endosomal VSG was obtained by 3D immunofluorescence analysis. The cell
surface was first double-labeled in the cold with cleavable
sulfo-succinimidyl-2-(biotinamido)-ethyl-1,3-dithiopropionate
(sulfo-NHS-SS-biotin) and noncleavable
sulfo-succinimidyl-7-amino-4-methylcoumarin-3-acetic acid (AMCA-sulfo-NHS).
After endocytosis to steady state (3 min at 37°C; unpublished data),
surface-associated biotin was removed by incubation with glutathione. Although
AMCA-labeled VSG was endocytosed with the same kinetics as biotinylated VSG as
shown by immunoelectron microscopy by using anti-AMCA antibodies (our
unpublished data), the AMCA fluorescence was quantitatively quenched within
the endocytic compartment. This fortuitous observation allowed us to visualize
VSG on the cell surface, including the flagellar pocket membrane, as blue AMCA
fluorescence, whereas endocytosed biotinylated VSG was detected through the
red fluorescence of Alexa Fluor 594 conjugated to streptavidin. In combination
with immunodetection of the clathrin heavy chain and Alexa Fluor
488-conjugated secondary antibodies, we were able to reconstruct a
multichannel, three-dimensional distribution map of endosomal VSG- and
clathrin-containing structures. Digitally deconvolved 3D data were analyzed
using (animated) maximum intensity projection
(Figure 2A), volume rendering
(transparency blending) (Figure
2B), and shadow projection
(Figure 2C; see legend for the
advantages of the different visualization techniques).
|
As expected, endocytosed VSG filled part of the cellular space between the flagellar pocket and the nucleus (Figure 2A, labeled FP and N). The overall VSG distribution within this area, however, did not look diffuse, but formed a coherent compartment with sharp borders. In addition, clathrin-containing structures colocalizing with endocytosed VSG were found in distinct parts of the endocytic compartment. As shown in Figure 2B and C, clathrin was not only associated with VSG-positive structures close to the flagellar pocket, but was also detectable in areas distant from the site of endocytosis. Volume-rendering (Figure 2B) and shadow projections (Figure 2C) indicated that a significant amount of clathrin was located at the periphery of the endocytic compartment. In quantitative terms, 42.7 ± 3.2% of the endocytosed VSG colocalized with clathrin and 65.8 ± 4.3% of clathrin colocalized with VSG (n = 15), implying that a significant fraction of clathrin-associated structures did not carry VSG. The fidelity of our method was validated by documenting the complete absence of a colocalization signal between 1) clathrin and AMCA-conjugated VSG located on the cell surface, and 2) clathrin and specific markers for the ER and the lysosome (our unpublished data). The further characterization of the relationship of the two proteins in membrane trafficking required the resolution of the electron microscope.
Endocytosis of VSG by Clathrin-coated Vesicles
For optimal ultrastructural preservation, trypanosomes were subjected to
high-pressure freezing and freeze-substitution followed by Epon embedding. The
electron micrographs shown in Figure 3, A
and D, clearly document the VSG coat on the cell surface, on the
membrane facing the flagellar pocket as well as the inner aspect of coated
pits (arrowheads) and vesicles (arrows; average diameter,
135 nm). On all
of these structures, 1) the fine-structural appearance, 2) the electron
density, and 3) the thickness of the coat, as determined by a quantitative
evaluation of perpendicularly sectioned membrane profiles, were very similar.
All subsequent experiments were performed with cryosections.
Figure 3, B, C, and E, shows
that the electron-dense layer on the cytoplasmic side of coated pits and
vesicles could be strongly labeled by anti-clathrin antibodies.
Figure 3E depicts a flagellar
pocket from cells surface-biotinylated at 0°C and briefly heated to
26°C to allow endocytosis. Biotinylated VSG was clearly present in CCPs
(Figure 3E, inset) and a
pinched-off vesicle (CCV) but not in the exocytic carrier vesicle (EXC; see
below). Therefore, these experiments prove that the extensively documented
spiny coat on the cytoplasmic side of endocytic vesicles of T. brucei
(Vickermann, 1969
;
Langreth and Balber, 1975
;
Webster and Grab, 1988
) is
indeed composed of clathrin as previously suggested
(Webster and Shapiro, 1990
;
Morgan et al., 2001
).
Based on criteria listed above, the VSG coat included in these vesicles is
indistinguishable from that at the flagellar pocket membrane. We designate
these vesicles as class I clathrin-coated vesicles.
On the average, sections through the flagellar pocket region showed three to four profiles of class I coated pits and vesicles. The abundance of these structures reflects the high rate of endocytosis in this organism. Preliminary experiments suggest that the endocytosed, biotinylated VSG is first delivered to cisternal structures located near the lysosome/nucleus and then moves via endosomes back to the flagellar pocket (Engstler and Grünfelder, unpublished data).
Clathrin-coated Vesicles Depleted in VSG Bud from Endosomes
Endosome-associated clathrin, was first described in mammalian cells by
Killish et al. (1992
)
and later in more detail by Stoorvogel et al.
(1996
). In their recent study,
Morgan et al. (2001
)
showed by cryoimmunogold electron microscopy that clathrin immunoreactivity is
widely distributed among membrane structures in the posterior region of T.
brucei in agreement with the fluorescence microscopic analysis
(Figure 2). Herein, we present
the relationship between endosome-associated clathrin and VSG.
On the electron microscopic level, the endocytic compartment of T.
brucei consists of a prominent system of narrow, sheet-like cisternae
(EC, for endocytic cisterna; 30.7 ± 0.3 nm in thickness), which in
cross sections, have an extended (Figure 4
A), or more rarely, circular shape
(Figure 6, A and D, circular
endosomal cisterna; cEC). The cisternae contain biotinylated VSG taken up by
endocytosis from the cell surface (Overath
et al., 1994
; our unpublished data). A common feature of
endosomal cisternae are coated, budding structures at their rims
(Figure 4, A and B, arrows) but
occasionally also on their planar face
(Figure 4C, arrow), which could
be labeled by anti-clathrin antibodies. Clathrin-coated vesicles
(Figure 4, AC, and F, arrowheads) distinctly smaller in size (5060 nm in diameter) than those
arising at the flagellar pocket (cf. Figure
4D) were regularly found near the endosomes. We designate these
vesicles class II clathrin-coated vesicles. In addition, a clathrin coat was
present at the rim (Figure 4E, arrow) or along the external face of the outermost trans-Golgi
cisterna (Figure 4F, arrows), a
pattern observed only on some Golgi profiles (see unlabeled Golgi complex in
Figure 4B).
|
|
Remarkably, the coated vesicles of class II budding from endosomal cisternae turned out to be depleted in VSG relative to the core of the cisternae (Figure 5, A and B). This is particularly evident in the endosomal structure shown in Figure 5A, which shows multiple endosomal buds essentially free of VSG-specific immunogold label, whereas the endosomal core is strongly positive for VSG. In principle, this pattern could be an artifact, if the antigen in the buds would be buried below the section's surface and, therefore, not accessible to antibodies and Protein A gold. Two observations argue against this possibility. First, in the very thin cryosection shown in Figure 5C, the bud was decorated by a single gold grain (demonstrating that it is accessible) but its labeling density was weak compared with the core of the cisterna. Second, the double-labeling experiments shown in Figure 5, DF, clearly indicated that VSG was not detectable in the clathrin-positive buds (arrows) and vesicles (arrowheads), although the cisternal core was strongly positive. We conclude that class II vesicles budding from endosomes are depleted of VSG relative to the cisternal core structure, from which they originate.
VSG Is Recycled to the Flagellar Pocket by TbRAB11-positive
Carriers
Because VSG is rapidly taken up by endocytosis but, at the same time, is
metabolically very stable, it has been suggested that >95% of the
internalized protein is recycled to the cell surface
(Seyfang et al.,
1990
). This implies that VSG/membrane endocytosis is compensated
by exocytosis and, in first approximation, the rate of transport must be the
same in both directions. In mammalian cells, the small GTPase RAB11 is an
established marker for recycling endosomes
(Ullrich et al.,
1996
; Sönnichsen et
al., 2000
) and recently, a homolog, TbRAB11, has been
characterized in T. brucei
(Jeffries et al.,
2001
). Therefore, this marker offered the opportunity to
investigate structures involved in recycling of VSG.
On the fluorescence microscopic level, anti-TbRAB11 antibodies showed
binding to well-defined, continuous subareas of the endocytic compartment
(Figure 2, DF;
Jeffries et al.,
2001
). In all cells analyzed, a distinct signal was obtained
juxtaposed to the flagellar pocket membrane
(Figure 2E, arrowhead). This is
likely the site where recycling, VSG-containing, exocytic carriers (see below)
fuse with the plasma membrane. Interestingly, a high percentage of TbRAB11
colocalized with VSG distant from the flagellar pocket, and we have always
detected RAB11-positive structures close to the lysosome
(Figure 6, A and B). Maximum
intensity and shadow projections of 3D images indicated that virtually all
RAB11-positive structures carry VSG (Figure
2, D and F). Volume rendering showed that a significant fraction
of TbRAB11-positive structures was embedded within the endocytic compartment
(Figure 2E). Quantitative
colocalization analysis disclosed that 27.8 ± 2.7% of all endocytosed
VSG colocalized with TbRAB11, whereas 89.2 ± 6.5% of TbRAB11
colocalized with VSG (n = 17).
On the electron microscopic level, both extended and circular profiles of the cisternae could be labeled on their cytosolic face by anti-TbRAB11 antibodies (Figure 6A, arrowheads), and a quantitative evaluation of 400 randomly selected sections showed that 51.7% of all endosomal profiles were positive for this protein. Some label was also associated with the trans-Golgi cisternae (Figure 6B, arrowhead). The most strongly labeled TbRAB11-positive, intracellular structures were flat, disk-shaped vesicles, which we have named EXCs. They are sausage-shaped in cross sections (Figures 6, E and F, and 7A; 153.6 ± 5.9 nm in length, 33.7 ± 0.5 nm in thickness) but reveal their plate-like structure when sectioned in-plane (Figure 6D, asterisk; 150 ± 3.8 nm in diameter) or tangentially (Figure 7D, asterisk). Exocytic carrier vesicles were located in abundance near the flagellar pocket (Figure 6, E and F) but were also found near endosomal cisternae close to the lysosome (Figure 6A). They approach the flagellar pocket in an orientation perpendicular to the plane of the target membrane (Figure 7, A and C) and then fuse (Figure 7, B and D). Importantly, the clathrin-coated pits budding from the flagellar pocket membrane did not react with anti-TbRAB11 antibodies (Figure 7, C and D).
|
Together with the endocytic vesicles, exocytic carriers had the highest VSG
concentration of all intracellular structures
(Figure 6F) and in the steady
state, they were strongly positive for surface-derived biotinylated VSG (our
unpublished data). An important question was whether the VSG density
(molecules/membrane area) in the exocytic carriers was as high as or even
higher than on the flagellar pocket membrane/cell surface. By counting the
number of gold grains per membrane length on ultrathin cryosections, we
estimated that the ratio in label density between the exocytic carriers and
the plasma membrane is
0.5 rather than
1. This ratio may be an
underestimate for experimental reasons. First, on cryosections (but not on
plastic sections), the cell surface was labeled along the whole section
thickness (confirmed by inspection of stereo images), whereas cytoplasmic
structures were only labeled at the section surface. Therefore, this edge
effect can result in an artificial overestimate of VSG density at the cell
surface relative to that on intracellular membranes. Second, at high antigen
density, the labeling efficiency is limited by electrostatic repulsion and/or
steric hindrance of Protein A gold complexes
(Griffiths, 1993
). Thus, it is
conceivable that these effects are more pronounced in the tightly opposed VSG
layers of the flat exocytic carriers than on the single-layered plasma
membrane, resulting in an underestimate of antigen density in the
carriers.
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
As judged by immunofluorescence (Figure 2, AC), most of the cellular clathrin is located at a distance from the flagellar pocket in the direction of the nucleus. The majority of this clathrin colocalizes with biotinylated VSG taken up to the steady state by endocytosis; however, there is no overlap with VSG for approximately one-third of the clathrin. This distribution is consistent with the immunoelectron microscopic results. Cisternal endosomes positive for VSG in their core region display clathrin-coated budding structures designated class II, which are essentially free of VSG (Figures 4 and 5). Moreover, in the vicinity of the cisternae, class II clathrin-coated vesicles are found in abundance, which are also deficient in VSG and are, therefore, most likely derived from these cisternae. The target membrane for the class II coated vesicles remains unknown (compare legend to Figure 1).
In mammalian cells, abundant endosomal clathrin-coated buds and derived
vesicles with a diameter of 60 nm, i.e., similar in size to those observed
herein, and generally negative for the adaptor complex AP2, were described by
Stoorvogel et al.
(1996
); the authors considered
that these coated vesicles are involved in recycling from early endosomes to
the plasma membrane or to the trans-Golgi network (TGN). In contrast,
Futter et al. (1998
)
showed that coated buds on endosomal tubules contained a subunit
characteristic for the adaptor complex AP1; these buds were proposed to be
responsible for concentrating the transferrin receptor being packaged for
basolateral sorting in MDCK cells. A recent study in HeLa cells by van Dam and
Stoorvogel (2002
) suggests
that the pathway from recycling endosomes to the plasma membrane is mediated,
at least in part, by endosome-derived clathrin-coated vesicles. Thus, the
target membrane for these vesicles likewise remains to be defined.
There seems to be a third clathrin-dependent budding process in T.
brucei occurring at the outermost trans-Golgi cisterna
(Figure 4). Because
tubular-vesicular structures defining the TGN in mammalian cells have not been
observed in this organism, this cisterna may be the TGN equivalent
(Field et al., 2000
;
McConville et al.,
2002a
), and, like in mammalian cells, clathrin may be involved in
the sorting of lysosomal proteins
(Alexander et al.,
2002
).
RAB11-positive Carriers Mediate Transport of VSG from Endosomes to
the Flagellar Pocket
About half of all endosomal cisternae can be designated recycling endosomes
because they contain the small GTPase TbRAB11. Some of these cisternae may be
interconnected (Webster, 1989
)
and by analogy to mammalian cells
(Sönnichsen et al.,
2000
), they may be organized as a mosaic of domains, which recruit
different RAB proteins to subregions of the same structure. We propose that
these cisternae are the source of the characteristic disk-like vesicles
designated exocytic carriers, which 1) are strongly positive for TbRAB11 and
VSG, 2) have a similar thickness and structural appearance as the cisternae in
cross section, and 3) are generally observed in the vicinity of cisternae.
Because of their abundance particularly close to the flagellar pocket, we
consider these carriers as the dominant and likely the only vesicular
structures that transport membrane from the endosomal compartment to the
flagellar pocket. This implies that the flow of VSG/membrane entering the cell
via class I clathrin-coated vesicles is balanced by a reverse flow by way of
TbRAB11-positive exocytic carriers. Kinetic experiments on the rates of
VSG-endocytosis and recycling support this view (unpublished data). They show
that clathrin-containing structures become VSGbiotin-positive
before the TbRAB11-carrying structures
(Figure 3E) arguing against an
endocytic function of the TbRAB11-positive carrier vesicles. To balance the
endocytic membrane flow via class I CCVs, the EXCs must be assumed to fuse
with the flagellar pocket rather than deliver the VSG by a kiss and run
mechanism. This view is strongly supported by the phenotype of cells where
clathrin-function has been abolished using the RNA interference technology.
There, the size of the flagellar pocket increases dramatically, which is
consistent with an inhibition of inward but unhindered outward membrane flow
(Engstler, unpublished data).
Trafficking and Sorting of VSG
The VSG at the surface coat has a purity of
95%, and the density of
this protein at the surface is 50-fold higher than on the membrane of the ER.
Therefore, VSG is very efficiently separated from other proteins as well as
laterally concentrated. This concentration gradient is achieved in two (ER
Golgi complex
flagellar pocket membrane) or three steps (ER
Golgi complex
endosomes
flagellar pocket membrane). If
exocytosis exclusively occurs via TbRAB11-positive exocytic carriers as
suggested above, then newly synthesized VSG may be routed directly or
indirectly from the Golgi complex to TbRAB11-positive recycling endosomes and
carriers to the flagellar pocket. VSGs endocytosed at the flagellar pocket
reaches these recycling endosomes probably via TbRAB5-positive early
endosomes, which seem to be preferentially located close to the nucleus rather
than in the direct vicinity of the flagellar pocket
(Pal et al., 2002
;
Engstler and Grünfelder, unpublished data).
The multiple steps at which VSG is sorted and concentrated may involve both
positive and negative selection mechanisms. Based on the observations
presented in this article, we can only comment on two of these steps. First,
we suggest that inclusion of the VSG coat in class I clathrin-coated pits and
vesicles is essentially a passive process, which involves no gross changes in
VSG concentration. However, without an accurate quantification in terms of
molecules/membrane area, it remains possible that the VSG concentration in the
vesicles (e.g., due to steric hindrance) is in fact somewhat lower than at the
flagellar pocket membrane. Second, we provide a rather strong argument for
sorting of VSG by default in the recycling endosomes. The class II
clathrin-coated vesicles budding from VSG-positive endosomal cisternae are
strongly depleted in VSG, implying that VSG is concentrated by negative
selection in the cisternae (Figure
5). We previously noted
(Grünfelder et al.,
2002
) that the membrane concentration of VSG in cisternal
structures increases two- to fourfold in a direction from the nucleus to the
flagellar pocket and that the concentration is particularly high in circular
cisternal profiles located close to the flagellar pocket. These observations
are consistent with a gradual increase in the lateral VSG density as more and
more membrane depleted in VSG is removed. As expected, the VSG concentration
in the exocytic carriers is high and approaches the surface density, but for
the technical reasons discussed above, may be underestimated relative to the
cell surface.
Our observations can be compared with studies on trafficking and sorting in
mammalian cells and yeast. As pointed out by Sabharanjak et al.
(2002
), nonselective uptake,
i.e., without significant changes in membrane density, is the most
parsimonious mechanism for GPI-anchored protein internalization by various
routes in mammalian cells, given their uniform, diffuse distribution at the
cell surface. There is now agreement that GPI-anchored proteins are not
enriched in clathrin-coated pits/vesicles or in caveoli relative to the plasma
membrane (reviewed in Chatterjee and Mayor,
2001
). However, a recently described cdc42-regulated, clathrin-
and caveolin-independent pinocytic pathway in COS and Chinese hamster ovary
cells has been suggested to recruit GPI-linked proteins from the cell surface
into a specific peripheral tubular-vesicular, early endosomal compartment,
where they seem to be (secondarily?) enriched. Thereafter, they are delivered
to pericentriolar recycling endosomes, where they are retarded by a
sphingolipid- and cholesterol-dependent mechanism relative to bulk membrane
constituent before being routed back to the plasma membrane by so far
undefined carriers (Mayor et al.,
1998
; Chatterjee et
al., 2001
; Sabharanjak
et al., 2002
). These authors invoke sphingolipid- and
cholesterol-rich lipid microdomains to explain both the selective uptake of
GPI-anchored proteins into the specific endocytic compartment as well as their
transient retention in recycling endosomes. In a recent article, Fivaz et
al. (2002
) concluded that
the differential sorting and fate of GPI-anchored proteins in endosomes of
baby hamster kidney and Chinese hamster ovary cells depends on their residence
time in lipid microdomains. In the Golgi/trans-Golgi network of
polarized Madin-Darby canine kidney and nonpolarized PtK2 cells,
lateral segregation and subsequent incorporation into distinct transport
carriers has been shown for a trans-membrane and a GPI-anchored cargo
(Keller et al.,
2001
). Finally, sorting of GPI-anchored proteins into defined
carriers has been demonstrated upon exit of the ER in yeast
(Muñiz et al.,
2001
). Together, these studies suggest that sorting of GPI-linked
proteins can occur in endosomes as well as at several stages in the
biosynthetic pathway.
Is Cellular Sorting the Key to GPI-Anchor Function?
The question why there is a glycolipid anchor as a mode for attaching
proteins to membranes has puzzled investigators for two decades
(Ferguson, 1999
;
Chatterjee and Mayor, 2001
).
The "raft" hypothesis (Simons
and Ikonen, 1997
) suggests a function in cellular sorting by
postulating that GPI-anchored proteins have a tendency to associate with
highly dynamic liquid-ordered lipid domains formed in the liquid-disordered
lipid bulk phase of a membrane. As summarized in a recent article by Anderson
and Jacobson (2002
), no
consensus about the size, shape, and location of these domains at the surface
of mammalian cells has emerged. In its second part, the hypothesis proposes
that such domains are specifically incorporated into transport carriers
formed, for example, at the trans-Golgi network for selective
delivery of GPI-anchored proteins to the cell surface. The difficulty with
this proposition is that it implies a sorting mechanism, which specifically
identifies GPI-linked proteins and/or lipid-ordered domains from the opposite,
cytosolic face of a membrane and ensures their preferential inclusion into
vesicular carriers. Based on the observations on endosomal sorting reported in
this study, we would like to suggest an alternative scenario. GPI-anchored
proteins can be specifically excluded from structures budding from a
given intracellular membrane, thereby being sorted and laterally concentrated
by negative selection. This may still involve association with fluid-ordered
lipid domains; however, these domains would not be included into budding
structures. The excluded regions enriched in the GPI-anchored and, likely,
other components such as sphingolipids or multipass trans-membrane proteins
such as transporters would then give rise to carriers such as the exocytic
vesicles described in this study. In conclusion, the essence of the glycolipid
anchor function would be that it is neglected by coats, which are involved in
positive sorting of trans-membrane proteins. In trypanosomes, multiple
negative sorting steps may operate to achieve the high VSG concentration at
the cell surface, which is vital for survival in the mammalian vascular system
providing a highly dynamic shield against antibodies toward buried invariant
surface proteins as well as against attack by complement.
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
Abbreviations used: GPI, glycosylphosphatidylinositol; VSG, variant surface glycoprotein; AMCA, 7-amino-4-methylcoumarin; FP, flagellar pocket; CCV, clathrin-coated vesicle; EC, endosomal cisterna; EXC, exocytic carrier vesicle; PAG, protein A gold complex.
Online version of this article contains video material. Online version of
this article is available at
www.molbiolcell.org. ![]()
¶ Corresponding author. E-mail address: peter.overath{at}tuebingen.mpg.de.
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Anderson, R.G.W., and Jacobson, K. (2002). A role for
lipid shells in targeting proteins to caveolae, rafts, and other lipid
domains. Science 296,
18211825.
Bamezai, A., Goldmacher, V.S., and Rock, K.L. (1992). Internalization of glycosyl-phosphatidylinositol (GPI)-anchored lymphocyte proteins. II. GPI-anchored and transmembrane molecules internalize through distinct pathways. Eur. J. Immunol. 22, 1521.[Medline]
Bretscher, M.S., Thomson, J.N., and Pearse, B.M.F.
(1980). Coated pits act as molecular filters. Proc. Natl.
Acad. Sci. USA 77,
41564159.
Brown, D.A., and London, E. (2000). Structure and
function of sphingolipid- and cholesterol-rich membrane rafts. J. Biol.
Chem.275,
1722117224.
Chatterjee, S., and Mayor, S. (2001). The GPI-anchor and protein sorting. Cell Mol. Life Sci. 58, 19691987.[CrossRef][Medline]
Chatterjee, S., Smith, E.R., Hanada, K., Stevens, V.L., and Mayor, S. (2001). GPI anchoring leads to sphingolipid-dependent retention of endocytosed proteins in the recycling endosomal compartment. EMBO J. 20, 15831592.[CrossRef][Medline]
Coppens, I., Opperdoes, F.R., Courtoy, P.J., and Baudhuin, P.B. (1987). Receptor-mediated endocytosis in the bloodstream form of Trypanosoma brucei. J. Protozool. 34, 465473.[Medline]
Cross, G.A.M. (1996). Antigen variation in trypanosomes: secrets surface slowly. Bioessays 18, 283291.[CrossRef][Medline]
Ferguson, M.A.J. (1999). The structure, biosynthesis and functions of glycosylphosphatidylinositol anchors, and the contributions of trypanosome research. J. Cell Sci. 112, 27992809.[Abstract]
Field, H., Sherwin, T., Smith, A.C., Gull, K., and Field, M.C. (2000). Cell-cycle and developmental regulation of TbRAB31 localization, a GTP-locked Rab protein from Trypanosoma brucei. Mol. Biochem. Parasitol. 106, 2135.[CrossRef][Medline]
Fivaz, M., Vibois, F., Thrunheer, S., Pasquali, C., Ambrami, L., Bickel, P.E., Parton, R.G., and van der Goot, F.G. (2002). Differential sorting and fate of endocytosed GPI-anchored proteins. EMBO J. 21, 39894000.[CrossRef]
Futter, C.E., Gibson, A., Allchin, E.H., Maxwell, S., Ruddock,
L.J., Odorizzi, G., Domingo, D., Trownbridge, I.S., and Hopkins, C,R.
(1998). In polarized MDCD cells basolateral vesicles arise from
clathrin-
-adaptin-coated domains on endosomal tubules. J. Cell
Biol. 141,
611623.
Griffiths, G. (1993). Fine Structure Immunochemistry. Heidelberg: Springer Verlag.
Grünfelder, C.G., Engstler, M., Weise, F., Schwarz, H., Stierhof, Y.-D., Boshart, M., and Overath, P. (2002). Accumulation of a GPI-anchored protein at the cell surface requires sorting at multiple intracellular levels. Traffic 3, 547559.[CrossRef][Medline]
Harder, T., Scheiffele, P., Verkade, P., and Simons, K.
(1998). Lipid domain structure of the plasma membrane revealed by
patching of membrane components. J. Cell Biol.
141,
929942.
Jeffries, T.R., Morgan, G.W., and Field, M.C. (2001). A developmentally regulated Rab11 homologue in Trypanosoma brucei is involved in recycling processes. J. Cell Sci. 114, 26172626.
Keller, G.A., Siegel, M.W., and Caras, I.W. (1992). Endocytosis of glycophospholipid-anchored and transmembrane forms of CD4 by different endocytic pathways. EMBO J. 11, 863874.[Medline]
Keller, P., Toomre, D., Diaz, E., White, J., and Simons, K. (2001). Multicolour imaging of post-Golgi sorting and trafficking in live cells. Nat. Cell Biol. 3, 140149.[CrossRef][Medline]
Killish, K., Steinlein, P., Römisch, K., Hollingshead, R.,
Beug, H., and Griffiths, G. (1992). Characterization of early and
late endocytic compartments of the transferrin cycle. J. Cell
Sci. 103,
211232.
Kirchhausen, T. (2000). Three ways to make a vesicle. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell. Biol. 1, 187198.[CrossRef][Medline]
Landfear, S., and Ignatushchenko, M. (2001). The flagellum and flagellar pocket of trypanosomatids. Mol. Biochem. Parasitol. 115, 117.[CrossRef][Medline]
Langreth, S.G., and Balber, A.E. (1975). Protein uptake and digestion in bloodstream and culture forms of Trypanosoma brucei. J. Protozool. 22, 4053.[Medline]
Mayor, S., Sabharanjak, S., and Maxfield, F.R. (1998). Cholesterol-dependent retention of GPI-anchored proteins in endosomes. EMBO J. 17, 46264638.[CrossRef][Medline]
McConville, M.J., and Ferguson, M.A.J. (1993). The structure, biosynthesis and function of glycosylated phosphatidylinositols in the parasitic protozoa and higher eukaryotes. Biochem. J. 294, 305324.
McConville, M.J., Ilgoutz, S.C., Teasdale, R.D., Foth, B.J., Matthews, A., Mullin, K.A., and Gleeson, P.A. (2002a). Targeting of the GRIP domain to the trans-Golgi network is conserved from protists to animals. Eur. J. Cell Biol. 81, 485495.[CrossRef][Medline]
McConville, M.J., Mullin, K.A., Ilgoutz, S.C., and Teasdale, R.D.
(2002b). Secretory pathway of trypanosomatid parasites.
Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 66,
122154.
Morgan, G.W., Allen, C.L., Jeffries, T.R., Hollinshead, M., and Field, M.C. (2001). Developmental and morphological regulation of clathrin-mediated endocytosis in Trypanosoma brucei. J. Cell Sci. 114, 26052615.
Morgan, G.W., Hall, B.S., Denny, P.W., Field, M.C., and Carrington, M. (2002a). The kinetoplastida endocytic apparatus. Part I: a dynamic system for nutrition and evasion of host defences. Trends Parasitol. 18, 491496.[CrossRef][Medline]
Morgan, G.W., Hall, B.S., Denny, P.W., Field, M.C., and Carrington, M. (2002b). The endocytic apparatus of the kinetoplastida. Part II: machinery and components of the system. Trends Parasitol. 18, 540546.[CrossRef][Medline]
Muñiz, M., Mosomme, P., and Riezman, H. (2001). Protein sorting upon exit from the endoplasmic reticulum. Cell 104, 313320.[CrossRef][Medline]
Overath, P., Chaudhri, M., Steverding, D., and Ziegelbauer, K. (1994). Invariant surface proteins in bloodstream forms of Trypanosoma brucei. Parasitol. Today 2, 5358.[CrossRef]
Overath, P., Stierhof, Y.-D., and Wiese, M. (1997). Endocytosis and secretion in trypanosomatid parasites - tumultuous traffic in a pocket. Trends Cell Biol. 7, 2733.
Pal, A., Hall, B.S., Nesbeth, D.N., Field, H.I., and Field, M.C.
(2002). Differential endocytic functions of Trypanosoma
brucei Rab5 isoforms reveal a glycosylphosphatidylinositol-specific
endosomal pathway. J. Biol. Chem.
277,
95299539.
Sabharanjak, S., Sharma, P., Parton, R.G., and Mayor, S. (2002). GPI-anchored are delivered to recycling endosomes via a distinct cdc42-regulated, clathrin-independent pinocytic pathway. Dev. Cell 2, 411423.[CrossRef][Medline]
Seyfang, A.D., Mecke, D., and Duscenko, M. (1990). Degradation, recycling and shedding of Trypanosoma brucei variant surface glycoprotein. J. Protozool. 37, 546552.[Medline]
Shapiro, S.Z., and Webster, P. (1989). Coated vesicles from the protozoan parasite Trypanosoma brucei: purification and characterization. J. Protozool. 36, 344349.[Medline]
Simons, K., and Ikonen, E. (1997). Functional rafts in cell membranes. Nature 387, 569572.[CrossRef][Medline]
Simons, K., and van Meer, G. (1988). Lipid sorting in epithelial cells. Biochemistry 27, 61976202.[CrossRef][Medline]
Sönnichsen, B., de Renzis, S., Nielsen, E., Rietdorf, J., and
Zerial, M. (2000). Distinct membrane domains on endosomes in the
recycling pathway visualized by multicolour imaging of Rab4, Rab5 and Rab11.
J. Cell Biol. 149,
901913.
Stierhof, Y.-D., Bates, P.A., Jacobson, R.L., Rogers, M.E., Schlein, Y., Handman, E., and Ilg, T. (1999). Filamentous proteophosphoglycan secreted by Leishmania promastigotes forms gel-like three-dimensional networks that obstruct the digestive tract of infected sandfly vectors. Eur. J. Cell Biol. 78, 675689.[Medline]
Stoorvogel, W., Oorschot, V., and Geuze, H.J. (1996).
A novel class of clathrin-coated vesicles budding from endosomes. J.
Cell Biol. 132,
2133.
Ullrich, O., Reinsch, S., Urbe, S., Zerial, M., and Parton, R.G. (1996). Rab11 regulates recycling through a perinuclear recycling endosome. J. Cell Biol. 13, 913924.
van Dam, E.M., and Stoorvogel, W. (2002).
Dynamin-dependent transferring receptor recycling by endosome-derived
clathrincoated vesicles. Mol. Biol. Cell
13,
169182.
Vickermann, K. (1969). On the surface coat and
cellular adhesion in trypanosomes. J. Cell Sci.
5,
163193.
Webster, P. (1989). Endocytosis by African trypanosomes. I. Three-dimensional structure of the endocytic organelles in Trypanosoma brucei and Trypanosoma congolense. Eur J. Cell Biol. 49, 295302.[Medline]
Webster, P., and Grab, D. (1988). Intracellular
colocalization of variant surface glycoprotein and transferrin-gold in
Trypanosoma brucei. J. Cell Biol.
106,
279288.
Webster, P., and Shapiro, S.Z. (1990). Trypanosoma brucei: a membrane-associated protein in coated endocytic vesicles. Exp. Parasitol. 70, 154163.[CrossRef][Medline]
Weise, F., Stierhof, Y.-D., Kühn, C., Wiese, M., and Overath, P. (2000). Distribution of GPI-anchored proteins in the protozoan parasite Leishmania, based on an improved ultrastructural description using high-pressure frozen cells. J. Cell Sci. 113, 45874603.[Abstract]
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. E. Vince, D. L. Tull, T. Spurck, M. C. Derby, G. I. McFadden, P. A. Gleeson, S. Gokool, and M. J. McConville Leishmania Adaptor Protein-1 Subunits Are Required for Normal Lysosome Traffic, Flagellum Biogenesis, Lipid Homeostasis, and Adaptation to Temperatures Encountered in the Mammalian Host Eukaryot. Cell, August 1, 2008; 7(8): 1256 - 1267. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||