|
|
|
|
Vol. 17, Issue 12, 5275-5286, December 2006
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Department of Cell Biology, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21205
Submitted August 30, 2006;
Revised September 28, 2006;
Accepted October 5, 2006
Monitoring Editor: Yu-li Wang
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Cytokinesis is coordinated by the mitotic spindle, which delivers spatiotemporal cues to the actin-rich cortex, leading to a redistribution of a number of cytoskeletal proteins, including myosin-II, to the equator of the cell (Rappaport, 1996
). Classic models of cytokinesis assign myosin-II the role of major radial force-producer that constricts the equatorial actin ring, producing two daughter cells (De Lozanne and Spudich, 1987
; Zurek et al., 1990
; He and Dembo, 1997
; Zang et al., 1997
; Robinson et al., 2002a
). Puzzlingly, cytokinesis in some cell types proceeds fairly normally without myosin-II, suggesting that cells have multiple mechanisms for driving furrow ingression (Kanada et al., 2005
). Other observations suggest that both the polar/global and equatorial regions of the cell cortex have important roles in the contractile process (Robinson and Spudich, 2000
; Matzke et al., 2001
; O'Connell et al., 2001
; Kurz et al., 2002
; Nagasaki et al., 2002
).
To establish quantitatively the roles of equatorial and global pathways in cytokinesis mechanics, we recently demonstrated that both radial stresses at the cleavage furrow cortex and resistive stresses at the global polar cortex help control cytokinesis dynamics (Zhang and Robinson, 2005
). In particular, contractility is driven by actively generated radial stresses from equatorial myosin-II and cortexillin-I and what is probably an intrinsic Laplace pressure due to stresses in the viscoelastic cytoskeletal network, whereas the resistive stresses are established by globally distributed proteins such as dynacortin and RacE small GTPase. Thus, cytokinesis seems to be executed by a complex network, involving multiple force-generating systems. Consequently, many proteins may contribute important functions to cytokinesis without producing gross phenotypes when mutated (Eggert et al., 2004
; Skop et al., 2004
). However, at present we still know very little about how the cytokinesis machinery works.
To probe the biocomplexity of cytokinesis, we used interaction genetics in the protozoan Dictyostelium discoideum. In particular, we used genetic suppression approaches to identify molecules whose loss-of-function phenotypes may be mild but that become more apparent in the context of other mutations. Using this approach, genes are functionally selected rather than isolated by screening thousands of clones for subtle phenotypes. Previously, we identified a version of dynacortin as a genetic suppressor of mutants of the equatorially localized actin cross-linker cortexillin-I (Robinson and Spudich, 2000
). Significantly, inhibition of dynacortin produces a mild morphological phenotype, but on more quantitative inspection, it has significant roles in cell mechanics and in controlling cytokinesis dynamics (Girard et al., 2004
; Zhang and Robinson, 2005
; Girard et al., 2006
). Thus, identification of relevant genes by using morphological criteria alone is insufficient for identifying the molecular bases of robust, dynamic, and complex processes such as cytokinesis, but rather it requires sophisticated genetic approaches.
In this article, we present the characterization of a novel protein, that we named enlazin, a fragment of which was identified in our original cortexillin-I suppressor screen (Robinson and Spudich, 2000
). Enlazin is a natural fusion of two classes of familiar actin cytoskeletal proteins, the ezrin-radixin-moesin (ERM)-family of membraneactin-tethering proteins and the actin cross-linker fimbrin. A truncated version of enlazin suppresses the growth-in-suspension defects of cortexillin-I mutants and disrupts endogenous enlazin expression. We demonstrate that enlazin contributes to cell adhesion and cortical mechanics. From these data, we propose that enlazin contributes to the resistance generated by the global cortex and to force generation through adhesion to the substrate, both of which contribute to cytokinesis dynamics.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
-tubulin:pDxA-BlR cells. The myosin II null cell line (myo II) was the HS1 (mhcA) strain (Ruppel et al., 1994
cortI strain is a deletion of the cortexillin-I locus generated by homologous recombination in the wild-type Ax2 background (Faix et al., 1996
Ax3:Rep orf+ strains were grown in Hans' enriched HL-5 media (1.4X HL-5 and 8% FM) plus 60 U/ml penicillin, 60 µg/ml streptomycin sulfate, and plus or minus 1530 µg/ml Geneticin (G-418), depending on whether the cells were transformed with an episomal plasmid. Ax2214 and myoII strains with episomal plasmids were grown in 1020 µg/ml G-418 or 515 µg/ml hygromycin, as appropriate. myoII::GFPmyoII:pDRH-HygR, RFP
-tubulin:pDxA-BlR derivatives were grown in 2 µg/ml blasticidin, 2.5 µg/ml hygromycin, and 30 µg/ml G-418 after transformation with pLD1A15SN-based vectors. Cells were propagated at 22°C on 10-cm plates. For suspension growth assays, cells were grown in 10-ml culture volumes in 125-ml Erlenmeyer flasks at 200 rpm. Cell densities were determined using a hemacytometer. Plasmids were transformed into Dictyostelium as described previously (Robinson and Spudich, 2000
).
Dictyostelium Expression Plasmids
The expression vectors used were pLD1A15SN, pDxA-Bl, or a Ddp1-based hygromycin-resistant plasmid pDRH-HygR (Robinson and Spudich, 2000
; Effler et al., 2006
). All plasmids have been engineered to have identical polylinkers. All cDNA fragments (including untagged genes, green fluorescent protein [GFP] or red fluorescent protein [RFP]-fusions, and hairpin constructs) were generated to have SalI and NotI ends or SalI and MluI ends, allowing the gene fragments to be moved from vector to vector without redesign.
Enl-tr construct encodes amino acid residues 92-497 and was isolated by selection as a suppressor of cortI1151 cells (Robinson and Spudich, 2000
). Enlazin full-length constructs with (enlfl; including all amino acid residues 1-1503) and without (enlfl-N; including amino acid residues 1-1462) the carboxyl terminal poly-N tail were generated by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification from genomic DNA and was assembled and verified by DNA sequence analysis. These constructs were assembled in pLD1A15SN. The enlazin hairpin construct (enlhp) was generated by cloning bases 1-1483 in the antisense orientation in SalI and NotI sites of pLD1A15SN; this generated the construct enlAS:pLD1. The sense fragment spanning bases 857-1462 was ligated into the NotI and MluI sites of enlAS:pLD1, generating enlhp:pLD1. GFP-enlfl was assembled by adding 5' XbaI site and a 3' NotI site (added after the translation terminator) to the enlazin full-length cDNA by using PCR and subcloning into a GFPS65T tagging vector (GFP2:pBS), by using the XbaI site and NotI sites. GFP-enl was subcloned into pLD1A15SN and pDRH-HygR as a SalI-NotI fragment. To examine interactions with
cortI-214, which has cortexillin-I deleted using a G418R marker (Faix et al., 1996
), enl-tr:pDRH-HygR and GFP-cortexillin-I:pDRH-HygR were constructed by moving the respective cDNAs from pLD1A15SN to pDRH-HygR as SalINotI fragments. GFP-
-tubulin and RFP-
-tubulin were also constructed in pDRH-HygR or pDxA-BlR as a SalINotI fragment.
Growth Rate and Nuclei/Cell Ratio Determination
Relative growth rates were determined by diluting the cells to a similar starting density and measuring the cell densities over several subsequent time points with a hemacytometer. The cell densities were plotted versus time and the resulting log phase curve was fit to a single exponential equation by using KaleidaGraph (Synergy Software, Reading, PA). The wild-type control strain was normalized to 1, and growth rates of other strains within each growth experiment were normalized to the wild-type control. The relative growth rates for each strain were averaged, and the SEM was determined. Statistical significance was determined using a two-tailed Student's t test.
During the log phase of growth, aliquots of cells were removed and fixed with 10°C methanol for 2 min. Cells were washed three times in PBT (1X phosphate-buffered saline, 0.5% bovine serum albumin [BSA], and 0.05% Triton X-100). Cells were stained with 1 µg/ml 4,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) for 20 min with gentle rocking. After washing, the cells were examined by fluorescence microscopy using an IX81 microscope (Olympus American, Melville, NY).
RNA Analysis
Total RNA was isolated using the TRIzol method (Invitrogen). RNA was quantified using a SmartSpec spectrophotometer (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA), separated on a 1% agarose-formaldehyde gel and transferred to Hybond-N+ nylon membrane (GE Healthcare, Little Chalfont, Buckinghamshire, United Kingdom) by capillary transfer. The fimbrin domain (nucleotides 2857-4380) of enlazin was labeled using the random hexamer labeling (Feinberg and Vogelstein, 1983
). Immobilized RNAs were hybridized with denatured
-32P-labeled DNA probes in Church's buffer (250 mM sodium phosphate, pH 7.0, 7% SDS, 1% BSA, and 1 mM EDTA). Hybridized RNAs were detected using an FX PhosphorImager (Bio-Rad).
Antibody Production and Western Analysis
The enlazin bases 2140-2855 (encoding amino acids 714-952; intervening region [IVR] region of enlazin) was expressed in Escherichia coli as a His-tagged protein by using pET14b vector (Novagen, Madison, WI). His-IVR protein was purified on Ni2+ Superflow resin (GE Healthcare), by using standard conditions. Rabbit polyclonal antibodies were generated using a standard protocol for antibody production.
For Western analysis, cell lysates were prepared by boiling cells in SDS sample buffer, electrophoretically separated on SDS-polyacrylamide gels, and transferred to nitrocellulose. Enlazin protein was detected using the anti-enlazin IVR rabbit polyclonal antibody and a goat anti-rabbit, horseradish peroxidase-conjugated, 2° antibody (Bio-Rad). Immune complexes were detected using the ECL detection system (GE Healthcare) and a VersaDoc imaging station (Bio-Rad).
Immunocytochemistry
For in situ localization of the endogenous enlazin, cells were plated on coverslips and allowed to adhere for 4 h to overnight. Cells were fixed for 5 min in fixation buffer (4% paraformaldehyde [Electron Microscopy Sciences, Ft. Washington, PA], 150 mM NaCl, and 0.1% Triton X-100). Cells were blocked for 10 min in PBT. Cells were immunostained with the anti-enlazin polyclonal antibodies (1:1000) in PBT. Antibodies were detected by indirect immunofluorescence using fluorescein isothiocyanate-conjugated donkey anti- rabbit secondary antibodies (Invitrogen) as appropriate. All washes were done in PBT.
Cell Imaging
For fixed and live cells, differential interference contrast (DIC) and epifluorescence imaging was done with a 40x (numerical aperture [NA] 1.3) objective and a 1.6x Optivar. A 60x (NA 1.45) objective with a 1.6x Optivar was used for three-dimensional (3D)-deconvolution and total internal reflection fluorescence (TIRF) imaging. For 3D-deconvolution, images were collected using 0.38-µm steps and deconvolved using a measured point spread function and the MetaMorph 3D-deconvolution module. A xenon lamp was used for illumination for wide-field epifluorescence and 3D-deconvolution imaging, and a 488-nm laser was used for TIRF imaging. All images were collected using an IX81 microscope equipped with the MetaMorph Software package (Molecular Devices, Sunnyvale, CA) and processed with Adobe Photoshop (Adobe Systems, Mountain View, CA). All live-cell imaging was performed at 22 ± 1°C.
For cytokinesis dynamics analysis, DIC movies were collected with 2-s time resolution, and cells were analyzed as described previously (Zhang and Robinson, 2005
). In this method, the minimal furrow diameter and furrow length at 4-s time resolution were measured. The time-point when the length and diameter were equal (the crossover distance, Dx) was defined as the crossover time (Tx). Tx was set to time 0, and the diameters were rescaled by dividing each diameter by Dx. Thus, all curves pass through the point (0,1), which is where Tx and Dx were found. The mean ± SEM Dx for each strain is presented on the graphs (Figure 6).
Cell Adhesion Assay
Log-phase cells were seeded in 2 ml of Hans' enriched HL-5 media in six-well plates. Both tissue-culturetreated and nontreated plates were used with similar results. Cells were incubated for 4 h (initial seeding density of 1 x 106 cells/ml) or overnight (initial seeding density of 3 x 105 cells/ml) at 22°C without agitation. Specific conditions for each experiment are noted in the figure legends. Samples were then rotated at a specified speed (rpm) for 1 h. Detached cell density and the total cell density were measured. Typically, three to five samples were counted at each rpm for each genotype.
Micropipette Aspiration
Our motorized micropipette aspiration setup was presented previously (Effler et al., 2006
). In short, borosilicate capillaries (o.d., 1.0 mm, i.d. 0.75 mm, 10 cm; Sutter Instrument, Novato, CA) were pulled to an inner diameter of 6 µm (PMP102 micropipette puller; MicroData Instruments, Woodhaven, NY) and filled with sterile filtered 1X phosphate-buffered saline. During the loading process, the needle, tubing, and pipette chambers were examined to ensure that air bubbles were not present within the system. Log-phase cells were transferred to imaging chambers and allowed to settle for 15 min, and all measurements were made with the cells cultured in Hans' enriched HL-5 media at 22°C. Cells were aspirated until the equilibrium length of the cortex tether pulled into the pipette (Lp) was equal to the radius of the pipette (Rp), forming a hemispherical deformation. The cell radius (Rc) was also measured. The aspiration pressure (
P) was calculated, using the hydrostatic equation
P =
gh, where g is the gravitational constant (9.8 m/s2), h is the differential height between the reference tank and the movable tank, and
is the density of water (1000 kg/m3). This pressure was then converted to nanonewtons per square micrometer. The effective cortical tension (T) was calculated from the Law of Laplace (T =
P/(2(1/Rp 1/Rc)) (Evans and Yeung, 1989
; Derganc et al., 2000
). By applying pressure to reach a hemispherical deformation (Lp = Rp), we measure an effective cortical tension of a specific geometric shape for each strain, removing ambiguity associated with determining a specific critical pressure for active, healthy cells (Derganc et al., 2000
).
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
cortI-214 (Faix et al., 1996
Enlazin Is a Fusion of Two Classes of Cytoskeletal Proteins
Full-length enlazin is a large, multidomain protein that includes an amino-terminal talin-like domain, an
-helical domain, and a fimbrin domain (Figure 2A). The genome project named the enlazin locus fimB due to its fimbrin domain (dictybase.org). Because of the multidomain structure, we suggest that this gene product represents a novel class of proteins, rather than a simple fimbrin-family member, although homologues in other organisms have yet to be identified. Thus, we have named the protein enlazin, from the Spanish enlazar, which means "to connect."
|
300 amino acids seem to define a Band 4.1-ezrin-radixin-moesin (FERM)-like domain (Figure 2B). Blast searches and pairwise alignments reveal that residues 8139 are most similar (27% identical and 49% similar) to the amino-terminal 122 amino acids of talin (including the first approximately one-third of the FERM domain of talin). Residues from
194390 are 27% identical and 48% similar to Dictyostelium protein kinase 5 with the strongest region of similarity spanning residues 210290, which is identified as a plekstrin homology (PH) domain (Figure 2C). The FERM domain has a tripartite structure with the third part having structural similarity to PH domains and corresponds in the linear sequence approximately to the PH domain-related region of enlazin (Figure 2B). Given the presence of the talin-homology region and the PH domain, the amino-terminal 300-amino acid region of enlazin resembles a FERM-like domain.
The FERM-like domain of enlazin is followed by an
400-amino acid
-helical domain that has a high probability for forming a coiled coil (Figure 2D). This
-helical region is 25% identical and 46% similar to the
-helical region of radixin. The combination of a FERM-like domain and
-helical region is strongly reminiscent of ERM proteins. However, instead of the short actin-binding domain found at the carboxy terminus in ERMs, enlazin has a 240-amino acid stretch that has no apparent homology to other proteins. We refer to this region as the IVR. The final 550 amino acids of enlazin are most similar (28% identical and 49% similar) to Oryza sativa fimbrin (Figure 2E). The enlazin fimbrin domain is 26% identical and 45% similar to mammalian T-plastin across the four T-plastin calponin homology (CH) domains. However, domain prediction algorithms only clearly identify three CH domains in enlazin. Furthermore, from pairwise and multisequence alignments, the similarity to other fimbrins is reduced in the fourth CH domain, although the protein is long enough for a distantly related CH domain to be present. Thus, it is unclear whether the fimbrin domain of enlazin will form two complete actin-binding domains, because each actin-binding domain is formed from two sequential CH domains.
Enlazin Is a Cortically Enriched Protein
After several unsuccessful attempts to recover an enlazin-deletion strain by using different knockout constructs, we silenced its expression using a hairpin construct (enlhp; Figure 3A). Silencing of genes by using hairpin constructs allows loss-of-function phenotypes to be studied with the added benefits that only the freshest phenotypes are analyzed and synthetic phenotypes with other deletion strains can be rapidly assessed (Girard et al., 2004
; Zhang and Robinson, 2005
; Girard et al., 2006
). The ability to acquire fresh mutants rapidly is extremely valuable, because many deletion strains have phenotypes that are more severe immediately after they were generated, but then these strains adapt to the mutation over a few weeks of culture. To assess the phenotypes of enlazin, we generated transformants, verified expression inhibition, and analyzed the phenotypes within 23 wk of transformation for every experiment.
|
We then used the anti-enlazin antibodies to detect endogenous enlazin by immunocytochemistry (Figure 3E). Enlazin protein was distributed in the cortex and was enriched in cell surface protrusions. This cortical distribution was specifically due to enlazin, because all staining was absent in wt:enlhp cells and increased in wt:enlOE cells. The distribution is strongly reminiscent of several cytoskeletal proteins, including dynacortin, coronin, and actin (de Hostos et al., 1993
; Robinson and Spudich, 2000
). Live cell imaging of wild-type cells expressing GFP-enlazin fusion protein showed a similar cortical enrichment (Figure 3F and Supplemental Movie 1).
Because enlazin was discovered in the same genetic suppressor selection as dynacortin, we speculated that enlazin might assemble into punctate surface structures, which are probably the Dictyostelium equivalents of focal adhesions (Robinson et al., 2002b
). To test this, we examined wt:GFP-enlazin cells by TIRF microscopy. Indeed, enlazin enriched in cell surface complexes similar to dynacortin and coronin (Figure 3G and Supplemental Movie 2). During cytokinesis, GFP-enlazin was distributed globally in the cytoplasm and cortex with enrichment in the membrane ruffles in wild-type and myoII mutant cells (Figure 3, H and I, and Supplemental Movies 3 and 4). This distribution was also observed for endogenous enlazin, which was detected using immunocytochemistry (data not shown). Similar to previous observations with dynacortin, enlazin becomes more cytoplasmic during early stages of cytokinesis when compared with interphase (Robinson and Spudich, 2000
; Girard et al., 2004
).
Enlazin Contributes to Cell Growth and Adhesion
On transformation, wt:enlhp cells were slow to grow and populate a plate. To quantify this, we analyzed the growth rates of the cells in suspension culture. From initial rounds of growth in suspension, wild-type and cortI1151 cells expressing enlhp grew more slowly than the parental counterparts (Table 1). However, we noticed that after many rounds (>4) the growth rates of wt:enlhp and cortI1151:enlhp cells approached the parental counterpart. From Western analysis, the increase in growth rate correlated with return of enlazin protein expression (data not shown). Thus, the slow growth rate corresponds to inhibition of enlazin by RNA interference.
During our analysis, we observed that wt:enlhp cells (area = 65 ± 1.9 µm2; n = 132) seemed to be smaller than wild-type control cells (area = 86 ± 3.0 µm2; n = 135; Student's two-tailed t test, p < 0.0001) but looked morphologically normal during interphase (Figure 4, AD). Because a smaller area could be due to reduced cell size or reduced cell spreading, we examined cell size by using forward scatter by fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) analysis. Wt control and wt:enlhp cells had an identical size distribution by FACS analysis (data not shown), indicating that the lower cell area is due to differences in cell spreading on surfaces. This result suggested that enlazin may contribute to substrate adhesion. To test this, we used an adhesion assay that allows for overall adhesion of the cell population to be measured (Fey et al., 2002
). In this assay, cells were rotated at specific speeds, beginning with 20 and increasing up to 200 rpm, and cells with adhesion defects detach at lower speeds than wild-type cells. Cells missing enlazin required less force to detach from the surface of the wells (Figure 4E). Thus, enlazin contributes to cell adhesion and cell spreading.
|
-tubulin:pDxA-Bl) cells to check the myosin-II distribution. Indeed, GFP-myosin-II localized normally to the cleavage furrow cortex in the absence of enlazin (Figure 4H). In this background, the enlhp cells again seemed more rounded during cytokinesis. Overall, in a wild-type background, silencing of enlazin did not increase the failure rate of cytokinesis on surfaces (Table 2).
|
-tubulin, allowing the cells to be verified as mitotic, we observed that myoII:enlhp cells frequently arrested at the dumbbell stage for >30 min (compared with 68 min. typical of myoII control cells) and/or completely failed at cytokinesis as the furrow slipped toward one end (Figure 5, B versus C, and Supplemental Movies 7 and 8). Overall, 40% of the myoII:GFP-
-tubulin; enlhp cells failed division compared with 0% of myoII control cells (Table 2). The myoII:enlhp cells also had a small increase in the number of multinucleated cells (Figure 5D); the relatively low incidence of multinucleated cells is consistent with the observed failure rate if there are other processes at work (see Discussion).
|
Enl-tr Disrupts Endogenous Enlazin
To analyze how enl-tr suppresses cortI mutant cells, we examined the expression of endogenous enlazin in cells expressing enl-tr. Surprisingly, endogenous enlazin expression was significantly knocked down (Figure 6A). By immunocytochemistry, endogenous enlazin was similarly undetectable in the presence of enl-tr (Figure 6B). By RNA analysis, endogenous enlazin mRNA was present at wild-type levels in cells expressing enl-tr, indicating that enl-tr does not have an RNA interference effect (data not shown). We also expressed a GFP-enl-tr, which failed to accumulate in cells but similarly disrupted endogenous enlazin expression (data not shown). Therefore, enl-tr seems to act as a dominant-negative mutant, possibly complexing with native enlazin or titrating a cofactor that is required for stability. However, expression of enl-tr is not identical to enlhp, because enl-tr increased the growth rate of wild-type and cortI1151 cells, whereas enlhp decreased the growth rate of these same cells (Table 1). This difference is probably due to the severity of the knockdown because enl-tr cells still express small amounts of enlazin, whereas enlhp cells do not.
|
To quantify the cytokinesis dynamics of these cells, we analyzed the kinetics of furrow ingression for each strain by using our rescaling methods developed previously (see Materials and Methods) (Zhang and Robinson, 2005
). The complemented cortI1151 mutant (cortI1151:cortI) had the expected wild-type trajectory (Figure 6E), whereas the cortI1151 control cells had a slow phase 1 (from 200 to 100 s) (Figure 6F). Significantly, cortI1151 cells expressing either enl-tr or enlhp had nearly wild-type kinetics of furrow thinning (Figure 6, G and H). It is notable that all four strains were identical in their trajectories from 50 to 100 s, whereas differences between cortI1151and the rescued strains occurred primarily from 200 to 100 s (Figure 6I). Thus, cortexillin-I seems to have its major role in furrow-thinning dynamics during the early stages of furrow ingression, and suppression of enlazin function quantitatively rescues this phase of cortexillin-I mutant cytokinesis.
Enlazin Contributes to Cell Cortex Mechanics
Because enlazin enriches in the cell cortex and contains a fimbrin domain, we hypothesized that enlazin may contribute to the mechanical resistance of the cortex. We used micropipette aspiration to measure the effective tension of wild-type cells and wild-type cells expressing enl-tr or enlhp (Figure 7). Expression of enl-tr, which partially reduced endogenous enlazin levels, caused a 7% reduction in cortical resistance compared with wild-type control; however, this difference is not statistically significant (Student's t test, p = 0.23). In contrast, a more complete inhibition of enlazin expression by enlhp caused a significant 38% reduction in the effective cortical tension (Student's t test, p < 0.0001). This level of reduction in cortical resistance is similar to that observed in cortexillin-I mutants (Simson et al., 1998
; Girard et al., 2004
). Thus, enlazin contributes to cortical resistance.
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
200 (Eggert et al., 2004
Genetic Analysis of Global and Equatorial Pathways
Here, we have used interaction genetics to identify and characterize enlazin. Enlazin is a natural fusion of two classes of actin-associated proteins, the ERMs and fimbrin. ERMs link actin to membrane through the FERM domain, and fimbrin crosslinks actin filaments into bundles (Hirao et al., 1996
; Bretscher, 1999
; Volkmann et al., 2001
). Thus, the current molecular model for enlazin is that it links actin filaments to the overlying plasma membrane. By connecting and integrating integral membrane adhesion proteins with the actin network, enlazin may form larger macromolecular cytoskeletal assemblies that simultaneously increase cortex resistance and cellsubstrate adhesion.
Significantly, enlazin and dynacortin were discovered in the same genetic suppression experiment. Dynacortin, an actin filament bundling protein that functions in a global pathway for cytokinesis control, is required for normal cortical viscoelasticity and functions as a brake, slowing furrow ingression (Robinson and Spudich, 2000
; Robinson et al., 2002b
; Girard et al., 2004
; Zhang and Robinson, 2005
). Similarly, enlazin contains an actin-binding domain, is localized globally during cytokinesis, regulates cytokinesis furrow morphology and dynamics, and contributes to cortical resistance. Therefore, enlazin and dynacortin act in a global pathway that controls cytokinesis dynamics and cortex mechanics.
Enlazin Contributes to Cytokinesis Dynamics
Overall, enlazin contributes to two features of cytokinesis: adhesion and cortical mechanics. Each property has important roles in cytokinesis, and each becomes critical when the cytokinetic machinery is perturbed in specific ways such as by removing cortexillin-I or myosin-II. To begin unraveling the contributions of these properties to cytokinesis, we have been developing a quantitative framework for analyzing cytokinesis dynamics in the protozoan Dictyostelium discoideum (Robinson et al., 2002a
; Reichl et al., 2005
; Zhang and Robinson, 2005
). In this framework, cytokinesis contractility is separable into three mechanical phases. Phase 1 is the movement away from an equilibrium position (the spherical mother cell) and requires energy input either through myosin-II mechanochemistry or adhesion-mediated traction forces. Phase 2 is a return to equilibrium (production of two spherical daughter cells), and during this phase, a cylindrical bridge is formed, which is predicted to be important for contributing additional forces (Laplace pressure), providing a boost for furrow thinning (Zhang and Robinson, 2005
). Phase 3 is a bridge dwelling phase that requires cytoskeletal disassembly and cell separation.
Silencing of enlazin in wild-type cells demonstrates that enlazin is required for normal cytokinesis morphology, including maintenance of a cylindrical bridge during phase 2. By contributing to the mechanical resistance of the global actin network, enlazin may directly contribute to cell shape. However, given the recruitment of enlazin into cell surface structures and its role in adhesion, enlazin may also be involved in traction forces that lead to bridge formation.
Enlazin may contribute in several ways to the cytokinesis dynamics of myosin-II mutants, which are dependent on surface adhesion for cell division. By contributing to adhesion, enlazin may be needed to generate adhesive forces that allow myosin-II mutant cells to complete cytokinesis. These adhesive forces may become particularly important at the phase 12 transition, the stage when the myoII:enlhp cells become delayed (Zhang and Robinson, 2005
). Alternatively, because enlazin contributes to cortical mechanics, its contribution to cortical resistance may be necessary to convert stresses generated from phase 1 cell elongation to (Laplace pressure-mediated) furrow-thinning of myosin-II mutants during phase 2 (Zhang and Robinson, 2005
).
Silencing of enlazin in the myosin-II mutant background caused 40% of the division events to fail but surprisingly yielded a population consisting of <20% multinucleated cells. However, if other processes (such as different success/failure rates for division of multinucleated cells or cell death) affect the nuclei/cell distribution (essentially a multiprocess Markov chain), then this difference is not unexpected. For example, in a simple scenario, if mononucleated cells fail division 50% of the time, but binucleated cells successfully complete division producing four daughter cells 100% of the time, then a steady state of 80% mononucleated cells is quickly reached in an asynchronous culture. Thus, our data argue for the existence of other processes that affect the nuclei/cell distribution of the myoII:enlhp cells. For these reasons, bulk measurements of nuclei/cell distributions are insufficient and should not replace direct single cell analyses for discerning the contributions of proteins to cytokinesis dynamics.
In contrast to the myosin-II mutants, the cortexillin-I mutants have altered furrow morphology and slower dynamics during phase 1, and inhibition of enlazin corrects both defects. Because cortexillin-I contributes to cortex resistance and is enriched in the cleavage furrow cortex (Simson et al., 1998
; Weber et al., 1999
; Girard et al., 2004
), the mechanical integrity of the cortexillin-I furrow cortex must be altered. By removing globally distributed enlazin, the mechanical differential between the furrow and global cortices may be restored. It is worth pointing out that enl-tr rescued cortexillin-I cytokinesis with only small effects in cortical resistance as measured with the micropipette aspirator. This may be because enl-tr reduces enlazin levels enough to promote a more dynamic actin cortex without yielding a large effect on cortex resistance. Furthermore, micropipette aspiration works by deforming the cell, inducing strain on the cortex of the order of 5%. Thus, there can be nonlinear effects on cortex mechanics that mask a partial inhibition of enlazin. Because enl-tr suppressed growth-in-suspension defect of cortexillin-I, however, we suggest that its suppression is more reflective of the role of enlazin in cortex mechanics, remodeling, and deformability rather than its role in cellsubstrate adhesion.
Cell Adhesion in Dictyostelium
Several proteins contribute to adhesion in Dictyostelium. Gp80 and ponticulin form the basis of a cellcell adhesion system (Hitt et al., 1994
; Harris et al., 2003
), whereas filopodin (talin), an integrin
-like protein, and sadA are involved in cellsubstrate adhesion (Simson et al., 1998
; Fey et al., 2002
; Cornillon et al., 2006
). Significantly, enlazin, cortexillin-I, and filopodin (talin) have quantitative effects on both adhesion and cortical mechanics (Simson et al., 1998
; Girard et al., 2004
; this study). Actin-crosslinkers dynacortin and coronin also enrich in cell surface structures, suggesting that these proteins may similarly contribute in quantitative ways to adhesive forces (Robinson et al., 2002b
). Thus, adhesion and cortex mechanics are controlled by a large number of overlapping cytoskeletal proteins. Genetic interactions of enlazin with myoII and cortexillin-I demonstrate how one protein can contribute to different cellular properties, each of which seems to become more significant in the context of other genetic lesions.
| CONCLUSIONS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
cortI-214 cells and Jim Spudich for the use of the myosin-II mutant cells. E.O. was partially supported by a Postbaccalaureate Research Education Program Scholar award. We also thank the Burroughs-Wellcome Fund, the Beckman Foundation, the American Cancer Society (Grant IRG-58-00541), and National Institutes of Health (R01 GM-066817) for support to D.N.R. | Footnotes |
|---|
This article was published online ahead of print in MBC in Press (http://www.molbiolcell.org/cgi/doi/10.1091/mbc.E06-08-0767) on October 18, 2006.
Address correspondence to: Douglas N. Robinson (dnr{at}jhmi.edu)
Abbreviations used: CH, calponin homology; ERM, ezrin-radixin-moesin; FERM, Band 4.1-ezrin-radixin-moesin.
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Cornillon, S., Gebbie, L., Benghezal, M., Nair, P., Keller, S., Wehrle-Haller, B., Charrette, S. J., Bruckert, F., Letourner, F., Cosson, P. (2006). An adhesion molecule in free-living Dictyostelium amoebae with integrin
features. EMBO Rep 7, 617621.[Medline]
Daniels, M. J., Wang, Y., Lee, M., Venkitaraman, A. R. (2004). Abnormal cytokinesis in cells deficient in the breast cancer susceptibility protein BRCA2. Science 306, 876879.
de Hostos, E. L., Rehfue
, C., Bradtke, B., Waddell, D. R., Albrecht, R., Murphy, J., Gerisch, G. (1993). Dictyostelium mutants lacking the cytoskeletal protein coronin are defective in cytokinesis and cell motility. J. Cell Biol 120, 163173.
De Lozanne, A. and Spudich, J. A. (1987). Disruption of the Dictyostelium myosin heavy chain gene by homologous recombination. Science 236, 10861091.
Derganc, J., Bo
ic, B., Svetina, S.,
ek
, B. (2000). Stability analysis of micropipette aspiration of neutrophils. Biophys. J 79, 153162.[Medline]
Dey, P. (2004). Aneuploidy and malignancy: an unsolved equation. J. Clin. Pathol 57, 12451249.
Effler, J. C., Kee, Y.-S., Berk, J. M., Tran, M. N., Iglesias, P. A., Robinson, D. N. (2006). Mitosis-specific mechanosensing and contractile protein redistribution control cell shape. Curr. Biol 16, 19621967.[CrossRef][Medline]
Eggert, U. S., Kiger, A. A., Richter, C., Perlman, Z. E., Perrimon, N., Mitchison, T. J., Field, C. M. (2004). Parallel chemical genetic and genome-wide RNAi screens identify cytokinesis inhibitors and targets. PLoS Biol 2, e379.[CrossRef][Medline]
Evans, E. and Yeung, A. (1989). Apparent viscosity and cortical tension of blood granulocytes determined by micropipet aspiration. Biophys. J 56, 151160.[Medline]
Faix, J., Steinmetz, M., Boves, H., Kammerer, R. A., Lottspeich, F., Mintert, U., Murphy, J., Stock, A., Aebi, U., Gerisch, G. (1996). Cortexillins, major determinants of cell shape and size, are actin-bundling proteins with a parallel coiled-coil tail. Cell 86, 631642.[CrossRef][Medline]
Feinberg, A. P. and Vogelstein, B. (1983). A technique for radiolabeling DNA restriction endonuclease fragments to high specific activity. Anal. Biochem 132, 613.[CrossRef][Medline]
Fey, P., Stephens, S., Titus, M. A., Chisholm, R. L. (2002). SadA, a novel adhesion receptor in Dictyostelium. J. Cell Biol 159, 11091119.
Fujiwara, T., Bandi, M., Nitta, M., Ivanova, E. V., Bronson, R. T., Pellman, D. (2005). Cytokinesis failure generating tetraploids promotes tumorigenesis in p53-null cells. Nature 437, 10431047.[CrossRef][Medline]
Gerald, N., Dai, J., Ting-Beall, H. P., De Lozanne, A. (1998). A role for Dictyostelium racE in cortical tension and cleavage furrow progression. J. Cell Biol 141, 483492.
Girard, K. D., Chaney, C., Delannoy, M., Kuo, S. C., Robinson, D. N. (2004). Dynacortin contributes to cortical viscoelasticity and helps define the shape changes of cytokinesis. EMBO J 23, 15361546.[CrossRef][Medline]
Girard, K. D., Kuo, S. C., Robinson, D. N. (2006). Dictyostelium myosin-II mechanochemistry promotes active behavior of the cortex on long time-scales. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 103, 21032108.
Harris, T.J.C., Ravandi, A., Awrey, D. E., Siu, C.-H. (2003). Cytoskeleton interactions involved in the assembly and function of glycoprotein-80 adhesion complexes in Dictyostelium. J. Biol. Chem 278, 26142623.
He, X. and Dembo, M. (1997). On the mechanics of the first cleavage division of the sea urchin egg. Exp. Cell Res 233, 252273.[CrossRef][Medline]
Hirao, M., Sato, N., Kondo, T., Yonemura, S., Monden, M., Sasaki, T., Takai, Y., Tsukita, S., Tsukita, S. (1996). Regulation mechanism of ERM (ezrin/radixin/moesin) protein/plasma membrane association: possible involvement of phosphatidylinositol turnover and Rho-dependent signaling pathway. J. Cell Biol 135, 3751.
Hitt, A. L., Hartwig, J. H., Luna, E. J. (1994). Ponticulin is the major high affinity link between the plasma membrane and the cortical actin network in Dictyostelium. J. Cell Biol 126, 14331444.
Kanada, M., Nagasaki, A., Uyeda, T. Q. (2005). Adhesion-dependent and contractile ring-independent equatorial furrowing during cytokinesis in mammalian cells. Mol. Biol. Cell 16, 38653872.
Kurz, T., Pintard, L., Willis, J. H., Hamill, D. R., Gönczy, P., Peter, M., Bowerman, B. (2002). Cytoskeletal regulation by the Nedd8 ubiquitin-like protein modification pathway. Science 295, 12941298.
Matzke, R., Jacobson, K., Radmacher, M. (2001). Direct, high-resolution measurement of furrow stiffening during division of adherent cells. Nat. Cell Biol 3, 607610.[CrossRef][Medline]
Nagasaki, A., de Hostos, E. L., Uyeda, T.Q.P. (2002). Genetic and morphological evidence for two parallel pathways of cell-cycle-coupled cytokinesis in Dictyostelium. J. Cell Sci 115, 22412251.
O'Connell, C. B., Warner, A. K., Wang, Y.-L. (2001). Distinct roles of the equatorial and polar cortices in the cleavage of adherent cells. Curr. Biol 11, 702707.[CrossRef][Medline]
Rappaport, R. (1996). Cytokinesis in Animal Cells. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
Reichl, E. M., Effler, J. C., Robinson, D. N. (2005). The stress and strain of cytokinesis. Trends Cell Biol 15, 200206.[CrossRef][Medline]
Robinson, D. N., Cavet, G., Warrick, H. M., Spudich, J. A. (2002a). Quantitation of the distribution and flux of myosin-II during cytokinesis. BMC Cell Biol 3, 4.[CrossRef][Medline]
Robinson, D. N., Ocon, S. S., Rock, R. S., Spudich, J. A. (2002b). Dynacortin is a novel actin bundling protein that localizes to dynamic actin structures. J. Biol. Chem 277, 90889095.
Robinson, D. N. and Spudich, J. A. (2000). Dynacortin, a genetic link between equatorial contractility and global shape control discovered by library complementation of a Dictyostelium discoideum cytokinesis mutant. J. Cell Biol 150, 823838.
Ruppel, K. M., Uyeda, T.Q.P., Spudich, J. A. (1994). Role of highly conserved lysine 130 of myosin motor domain. In vivo and in vitro characterization of site specifically mutated myosin. J. Biol. Chem 269, 1877318780.
Simson, R., Wallraff, E., Faix, J., Niewöhner, J., Gerisch, G., Sackmann, E. (1998). Membrane bending modulus and adhesion energy of wild-type and mutant cells of Dictyostelium lacking talin or cortexillins. Biophys. J 74, 514522.[Medline]
Skop, A. R., Liu, H., Yates, J., Meyer, B. J., Heald, R. (2004). Dissection of the mammalian midbody proteome reveals conserved cytokinesis mechanisms. Science 305, 6166.
Stukenberg, P. T. (2004). Triggering p53 after cytokinesis failure. J. Cell Biol 165, 607608.
Volkmann, N., DeRosier, D., Matsudaira, P., Hanein, D. (2001). An atomic model of actin filaments cross-linked by fimbrin and its implications for bundle assembly and function. J. Cell Biol 153, 947956.