QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

Vol. 18, Issue 1, 211-228, January 2007

This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) Supplemental Material All Versions of this Article: E06-05-0445v1 18/1/211    most recent Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Wüstner, D. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Wüstner, D.

Plasma Membrane Sterol Distribution Resembles the Surface Topography of Living Cells

Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Southern Denmark, DK-5230 Odense M, Denmark

Submitted May 22, 2006; Revised August 24, 2006; Accepted October 13, 2006
Monitoring Editor: Sean Munro

	ABSTRACT

TOP ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION MATERIALS AND METHODS RESULTS DISCUSSION REFERENCES

 
Cholesterol is an important constituent of cellular membranes. It has been suggested that cholesterol segregates into sterol-rich and -poor domains in the plasma membrane, although clear evidence for this is lacking. By fluorescence imaging of the natural sterol dehydroergosterol (DHE), the lateral sterol distribution has been visualized in living cells. The spatial labeling pattern of DHE coincided with surface structures such as ruffles, microvilli, and filopodia with correlation lengths in the range of 0.8–2.5 µm. DHE staining of branched tubules and of nanotubes connecting two cells was detected. Dynamics of DHE in folded and plane membrane regions was comparable as determined by fluorescence recovery after photobleaching. DHE colocalized with fluid membrane-preferring phospholipids in surface structures and at sites of cell attachment as well as in the cleavage furrow of dividing cells, but it was not particularly enriched in those regions. Fluorescent sterol showed homogeneous staining in membrane blebs induced by F-actin disruption. Cross-linking the ganglioside GM1—a putative raft marker—did not affect the cell surface distribution of DHE. The results suggest that spatial heterogeneities of plasma membrane staining of DHE resolvable by light microscopy reflect the cell surface topography but not phase-separated sterol domains in the bilayer plane.

	INTRODUCTION

TOP ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION MATERIALS AND METHODS RESULTS DISCUSSION REFERENCES

 
Cholesterol is the most abundant single lipid species in the plasma membrane of living cells. Here, cholesterol functions by increasing the permeability barrier of the phospholipid bilayer but also by mediating signal transduction and vesicle fission from the surface during endocytosis (Maxfield and Wüstner, 2002). It has been proposed that the many functions of cholesterol in cellular membranes relate to the ability of this sterol to form segregated lateral domains with specific properties in the bilayer plane (Maxfield, 2002). Elucidating the organization of cholesterol in the plasma membrane under physiological conditions is of crucial importance for determining mechanisms underlying trafficking of sterols in cells. It is well established for model membranes that cholesterol together with phospho- or sphingolipids bearing saturated fatty acyl chains forms a so-called liquid ordered (lo) phase (Ipsen et al., 1987; Vist and Davis, 1990; Ahmed et al., 1997). Ternary mixtures of lipid species, including cholesterol organized in giant unilamellar vesicles (GUVs), are commonly used to visualize sterol-induced phase separation (Korlach et al., 1999). A long-standing question is whether observations on those model membrane systems apply also to cellular membranes. Under pathological circumstances such as in cholesterol-loaded aortic smooth muscle cells, cholesterol microcrystallites paralleled by a bilayer thickening have been found by x-ray spectroscopy (Tulenko et al., 1998). However, it is unclear whether cholesterol can form lateral clusters in the plane of the plasma membrane under physiological conditions, as stated in connection with the "raft hypothesis" (Simons and Ikonen, 1997; Maxfield and Wüstner, 2002; Zuckermann et al., 2004; Zhang et al., 2005). Highly curved membrane regions such as tubules play an important role during intracellular membrane fission as well as at the cell surface during plasma membrane ruffling (Hirschberg et al., 1998; Sheetz, 2001). Both processes have been shown to require cholesterol (Grimmer et al., 2000, 2002). It remains to be established whether cholesterol partitions into those tubular structures as it is debated in models of biomembrane function (Corbeil et al., 2001; Huttner and Zimmerberg, 2001). To address these important questions requires a method to directly visualize the distribution of sterols in cellular membranes of living cells. Dehydroergosterol (DHE), a natural sterol from yeast, has very similar physicochemical properties to cholesterol in model and cellular membranes (Smutzer et al., 1986). DHE is a close analogue of cholesterol and has often been used to analyze lateral sterol organization in model membranes by using fluorescence spectroscopy (Yeagle et al., 1982; Chong and Thompson, 1986; Liu et al., 1997; Loura and Prieto, 1997). Microscopic visualization in living cells became recently possible by adapting a conventional epifluorescence microscope for UV imaging (Mukherjee et al., 1998). Imaging of DHE in living cells is limited by the fact that its emission maximum is between 370 and 400 nm in lipid membranes (Smutzer et al., 1986; Mukherjee et al., 1998). Using multiphoton fluorescence microscopy, Schroeder and colleagues have analyzed the distribution of DHE in the plasma membrane of fibroblasts (Zhang et al., 2005). Elaborated image analysis tools were required to extract plasma membrane from intracellular fluorescence of cells labeled to steady state with DHE. Using thresholding and intensity measurements along plasma membrane segments, Zhang et al. (2005) found evidence for clusters of DHE in the membrane with typical lengths of 565 nm. A problem with this approach is the low signal obtainable by multiphoton imaging of DHE. This makes interpretation of the findings very difficult.

Using wide field fluorescence microscopy and three-dimensional (3D) iterative deconvolution in concert with bleaching correction, the lateral distribution of DHE was determined in the plasma membrane of living polarized and nonpolarized cells. Highly improved spatial resolution of DHE in the cell membrane was obtained. Statistical image analysis was used to quantify distribution of DHE in the plasma membrane. Fluorescent phospholipid probes were selected based on their predicted propensities to partition into lo- or liquid-disordered (ld) phases in model membranes, and their plasma membrane distribution was compared with that of DHE. Fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP), bleach rate imaging, and time-integrated photobleaching were used to characterize the lateral distribution of DHE at the cell surface. To look at lipid distributions in the plasma membrane in the absence of cytoskeleton support, plasma membrane blebs were generated by actin disruption. In membrane blebs, lateral constraints on protein and lipid diffusion are released and only forces acting between membrane molecules should determine the lateral lipid distribution (Tank et al., 1982). These conditions are well suited to determine whether sterol phase segregates in cellular membranes and to assess the relevance of model membrane studies for analysis of biomembrane architecture. Finally, macroscopic domain formation was triggered by cross-linking gangliosides with cholera toxin in the plasma membrane. In colabeling studies, it was determined whether DHE redistributes with patched gangliosides in putative lipid rafts.

	MATERIALS AND METHODS

TOP ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION MATERIALS AND METHODS RESULTS DISCUSSION REFERENCES

 
Reagents
NBD-labeled phosphatidylcholine (PC) 1-palmitoyl-2-[6-[(7-nitro-2–1,3-benzooxadiazol-4-y) amino]caproyl]-sn-glycero-3-phosphatidylcholine (C6-NBD-PC), red fluorescent PC 2-(4,4-difluoro-5-(4-phenyl-1,3-butadienyl)-4-bora-3a, 4a-diaza-s-indacene-3-pentanoyl)-1-hexa-decanoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine (-BODIPY-PC), 1,1'-didodecyl-3,3,3',3'-tetramethylindocarbocyanine perchlorate [DiIC12(3)], 1,1'-dihexadecyl-3,3,3',3'tetramethylindocarbocyanine perchlorate [DiIC16(3)] Alexa488-labeled cholera toxin subunit B (Alexa488-CTxB), and the Vybrant kit for detecting membrane domains were purchased from Invitrogen (Carlsbad, CA). Fetal calf serum (FCS) and DMEM were from Invitrogen (Paisley, Scotland). All other chemicals were from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO). Buffer medium contained 150 mM NaCl, 5 mM KCl, 1 mM CaCl₂, 1 mM MgCl₂, 5 mM glucose, and 20 mM HEPES, pH 7.4, as described previously (Wüstner et al., 2002).

Cell Culture
HepG2 cells and J774 cells were grown in DMEM with 4.5 g/l glucose, supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated FCS and antibiotics. HepG2 cells were routinely passaged in plastic tissue culture dishes. J774 cells were passaged in 25-cm² bacterial plastic culture dishes as described previously (Wüstner et al., 2005). For experiments, cells were plated onto glass coverslips coated with poly-D-lysine (Salzmann and Maxfield, 1989). HepG2 cells were used after reaching the highest degree of polarization as described previously (Wüstner et al., 2001). TRVb-1 is a modified Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cell line that lacks endogenous transferrin (Tf) receptor and expresses the human Tf receptor (McGraw et al., 1987). TRVb-1 cells were grown in bicarbonate buffered Ham's F-12 medium supplemented with 5% FCS and antibiotics. Bovine mammary gland epithelial (BMGE) cells were grown in DMEM, supplemented with 20% heat-inactivated FCS, antibiotics, and L-glutamine as well as prolactin, insulin, and hydrocortisone (1 µg/ml each) as described previously (Schmid et al., 1983).

Labeling of Cells with DHE and Fluorescent Phospholipid Analogues
A stock solution of DHE (5 mM) was made in ethanol and stored under argon. For labeling cells with DHE, the analogue was loaded on methyl--cyclodextrin, giving a DHE/methyl--cyclodextrin (DHE/MCD) solution as described previously (Hao et al., 2002). HepG2 or TRVb-1 cells were routinely labeled with DHE/MCD for 1 min and J774 cells for 5 min at 37°C. Cells were washed and imaged on a wide field microscope as described below. DiI lipid- and -BODIPY-PC–labeling solutions were prepared as described previously by binding analogues to fatty acid-free bovine serum albumin (BSA) (Mukherjee et al., 1999; Wüstner et al., 2001). HepG2 cells were labeled with either -BODIPY-PC, DiIC12, or DiIC16 for 1 min at 37°C, washed, and imaged as described below. For detection of plasma membrane colocalization, HepG2 cells were labeled with DHE/MCD for 1 min at 37°C, washed, labeled with -BODIPY-PC, washed, and imaged as described below.

Colabeling of Cells with DHE, DiIC12, and Cholera Toxin Subunit B
BMGE cells were labeled with DHE/MCD for 1 min at 37°C, washed, and chilled with ice-cold buffer solution, and then they were placed on ice and incubated for 25 min with 50 µg/ml Alexa488-CTxB. Cells were washed twice with cold (2°C) and once with warmed buffer and imaged on a wide field microscope. Alternatively, cells were after cold wash incubated with 10 µg/ml anti-CTxB antibody solution following the protocol of the Vybrant raft kit from Invitrogen. In some experiments, cells were—after labeling with DHE/MCD—incubated with DiIC12 for 1 min at 37°C, washed, and labeled with Alexa488-CTxB as described above.

Disruption of the Actin Cytoskeleton and Labeling of Plasma Membrane Blebs
HepG2 cells were incubated for 20 min at 37°C with 20 µM cytochalasin D to disrupt F-actin. Cells were washed and labeled either with C6-NBD-PC or double-labeled with DHE and -BODIPY-PC as described above. During all subsequent incubations cytochalasin D was present. For staining of actin cytochalasin D-treated and nontreated cells were fixed with 3.3% paraformaldehyde (PFA) for 30 min, permeabilized in blocking buffer (1% Triton X-100, 1% BSA [wt/vol] in buffer medium), and incubated with Alexa488-phalloidin for 30 min (diluted 1:200 from a stock solution in blocking buffer) at room temperature. Cells were rinsed five times and observed by fluorescence microscopy.

Imaging of DHE in Crystals and Films
A drop containing 100 µl of DHE/MCD solution was added to a microscope dish, and the solvent was evaporated at room temperature in the dark and overnight. Under those conditions, DHE precipitates from the supersaturated solution and forms brightly fluorescent crystals, whereas the aqueous solvent evaporates. To generate a DHE film, 100 µl of the DHE stock solution in ethanol was added to a microscope slide, and the solvent was evaporated under a flow of nitrogen or argon. Crystals or films of DHE were imaged as described below.

Fluorescence Microscopy and Image Analysis
Wide field fluorescence microscopy and digital image acquisition were carried out using a Leica DMIRB microscope with a 63x, 1.4 numerical aperture oil immersion objective (Leica Lasertechnik, Wetzlar, Germany) equipped with a Princeton Scientific Instruments (Monmouth Junction, NJ) cooled charge-coupled device (CCD) camera driven by Image-1/MetaMorph Imaging System software (Molecular Devices, Sunnyvale, CA). Alternatively, a Leica DMIRBE microscope containing the same optical components equipped with a Hamamatsu Orca BT512 4-stage peltier and water-cooled (–80°C) CCD camera (Hamamatsu Photonics, Hamamatsu City, Japan) and a Lambda SC smartshutter (Sutter Instrument, Novato, CA), driven by Image-Pro Plus and ScopePro (Media Cybernetics, Silver Spring, MD) was used. DiIC12, DiIC16, and -BODIPY-PC were imaged using a standard rhodamine filter set (535-nm [50-nm bandpass] excitation filter, 565-nm longpass dichromatic filter, and 610-nm [75-nm] bandpass emission filter). Detection of the emission of DHE was made possible by using a camera with back-thinned CCD chip (either Princeton Instruments Frame Transfer Pentamax with a 512 x 512 EEV chip or Hamamatsu Orca B 512 with similar characteristics). To optimize UV throughput in the excitation path, a lamp housing from Leica Lasertechnik with collector lenses having high transmittance in the UV was used. The light source was a mercury lamp (100 W) with a power density of irradiation of 170.000 cd/cm². DHE was imaged using a specially designed filter cube obtained from Chroma Technology (Brattleboro, VT) with 335-nm (20-nm bandpass) excitation filter, 365-nm longpass dichromatic filter, and 405-nm (40-nm bandpass) emission filter as described previously (Wüstner et al., 2002). All other components of the microscope were adapted for UV imaging as described previously (Wüstner et al., 2002). Image analysis was carried out using the software packages Image-1/MetaMorph Imaging System (Molecular Devices), Image-Pro Plus (Media Cybernetics), or NIH Image in form of Scion Image (Scion, Frederick, MD) or ImageJ (developed at the National Institutes of Health and available at http://rsb.info.nih.gov/ij). For presentation purposes and contrast adjustment Adobe Photoshop (Adobe Systems, Mountain View, CA) was used. Differential interference contrast (DIC) imaging was performed on a wide field microscope as described above by using DIC optics. Time-lapse imaging of unlabeled cells or of DHE-labeled HepG2 cells was performed by image acquisition every 1 min at a temperature-controlled microscope stage of a wide field microscope maintained at 36 ± 1°C. Time-lapse sequences of DHE-labeled cells were corrected for bleaching as described previously (Wüstner, 2005a). Three-dimensional visualization of image stacks was performed using the ImageJ plugin SurfacePlot3D developed by Dr. Bartel (Technische Fachhochschule, Berlin, Germany).

Colocalization of DHE with Fluorescent Lipids and Proteins in the Plasma Membrane
This method is equal to that used previously to determine intracellular transport of DHE (Wüstner et al., 2002). Briefly, cells double labeled with DHE and -BODIPY-PC were imaged by acquiring z-stacks 0.5 µm apart starting 2.5 µm above the central focal position. The axial chromatic shift between the DHE and -BODIPY-PC channel was determined as described by measuring fluorescence beads (Wüstner et al., 2002). Lateral chromatic shift was corrected using the TurboReg plugin of ImageJ software written by Dr. Thevenaz (Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, Lausanne, Switzerland). Hereby, a rigid body transformation was applied to spatially register corresponding planes of DHE and -BODIPY-PC (Thevenaz et al., 1998). After bleaching correction and deconvolution (nearest neighbor or iterative 3D) of the DHE stack, corresponding individual spatially aligned planes were compared and color coded for presentation. Alternatively, the sum projection of three individual corresponding planes was used. The same approach was applied to cells were the cytoskeleton was disrupted. For image deconvolution, a maximum likelihood restoration method using the Huygens software was applied (Scientific Volume Imaging, Hilversum, The Netherlands). This approach reduces apparent noise in the image by formulating a log-likelihood function that measures the likelihood of sampling the noisy data that were actually collected (Holmes et al., 1995; Verveer et al., 1999). Three-dimensional surface reconstructions were generated for the DHE channel or for areas of colocalization between DHE and -BODIPY-PC by using Huygens software (Scientific Volume Imaging). Colocalization of DHE with -BODIPY-PC was determined from wide field images of double-labeled cells by using Image-Pro Plus (Media Cybernetics). Pearson's correlation coefficient, r_p, is given by the following equation:

(1)

where R_i and G_i is the fluorescence intensity in red and green per pixel i, respectively. The average intensity in red and green in an image is given by R_A and G_A, respectively (Brown et al., 2000). Colocalization of DHE with DiIC12 or Alexa488-CTxB was determined in the same manner.

Ratio Imaging and Principal Component Analysis (PCA) of DHE and -BODIPY-PC
Corresponding single spatially aligned planes of DHE and -BODIPY-PC were background corrected as described previously (Ghosh et al., 1994; Mukherjee et al., 1999). The ratio image of DHE and -BODIPY-PC was calculated using the public domain software ImageJ (NIH Image, http://rsb.info.nih.gov/ij). The ratio image allows for detection of spatially differing labeling intensity of two probes in the plasma membrane (Zamir et al., 1999). It was normalized and saved as 8-bit image for presentation or used in further calculations (see Results and above). Note that no deconvolution step was applied before ratio calculations. To assess the statistical differences in spatial labeling patterns of DHE and -BODIPY-PC, a PCA was performed using the ImageJ plugin PCA written by Dr. Abrámoff (University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, IA). The principle of PCA is to consider every pixel of spatially aligned images as vector; to calculate the mean, variance, and covariance between vector components; and to perform a variable transformation that results in a set of orthogonal eigenvectors maximizing the data variation along the eigenvectors of the covariance matrix. Let and _x be column vectors representing actual and mean intensity values for one common pixel in the DHE and -BODIPY-PC image, respectively. The covariance matrix of the vector population is defined as follows:

(2)

Using the so-called Hotelling transformation (Gonzalez and Woods, 2002):

(3)

whose mean vector _y is zero, it follows that the covariance matrix of the transformed vector is as follows:

(4)

The rows of the matrix A are orthonormal vectors (eigenvectors) named , each sequentially maximizing the percentage of variation by using the method of Lagrange multipliers under the orthogonality condition ^T · =1:

(5)

Here, corresponds to the eigenvalues being the main diagonal elements of the diagonal matrix C_y, which are determined by solving the eigenvalue problem:

(6)

where I is the unity matrix. The output of the PCA aligns the original data along the directions of greatest variance given by the eigenvectors (principal components) of the covariance matrix C_x associated with the largest eigenvalues . As a result one obtains the first principal component as the direction within the original data has the largest variability, and the second component being perpendicular to the first component pointing toward the next large data variability (Gonzalez and Woods, 2002; Rowe and Hoffmann, 2006). The number of components is equal to the number of original variables, i.e., two when comparing images of DHE and -BODIPY-PC.

Determination of Plasma Membrane Staining Patterns
After background subtraction a line scan along the plasma membrane outlining the perimeter of the cell labeled either with DHE, -BODIPY-PC, DiIC12, DiIC16, or with Alexa488-CTxB was generated using Image-Pro Plus (Media Cybernetics). Fluorescence intensity along this line was measured, and results were exported to an Excel spread sheet (Microsoft, Redmond, WA) or saved as an ASCII file and later imported in SigmaPlot 9.0 (SPSS, Chicago, IL). To smooth data, a low pass filter or a running median implemented in SigmaPlot was occasionally applied. To determine whether the observed staining pattern of DHE could be caused by image noise, synthetic cell images were generated using ImageJ software. A cell outline was drawn using the free hand selection tool, and an pixel intensity value of 80 in an 8-bit image was added to this region. The "plasma membrane" image was generated by applying a variance filter of 7-pixel radius. To account for image noise either Gaussian or Poisson noise was added to the images. To this end, the RandomJ plugin to ImageJ written by Dr. Meijering (Swiss Federal Institute of Technology) was used. Next, the plasma membrane was manually outlined using ImagePro Plus (Media Cybernetics), and intensity was measured along this line as described above for real data. To compare staining patterns of DHE and -BODIPY-PC in the plasma membrane of living HepG2 cells, the line scan was measured for the sum projection of three corresponding planes of double-labeled cells. Correlation coefficients between DHE and -BODIPY-PC or DHE and Alexa488-CTxB scan data were calculated using a bivariate analysis routine implemented in SigmaPlot 9.0 (SPSS). Autocorrelation images were generated using the fast Fourier transform as implemented in Scion Image macros (Scion). Autocorrelation curves were measured from two-dimensional (2D) autocorrelation determined for selected regions (32 x 32 pixels) of double stained plasma membrane, exported as ASCII file and plotted using SigmaPlot 9.0 (SPSS). Note that no deconvolution was applied for all quantitative image measurements.

Bleach Rate Imaging and Time-integrated Photobleaching of DHE
Two images were acquired with 2-s integration time without interval for HepG2 cells labeled with DHE. Under those conditions some bleaching of DHE fluorescence in the plasma membrane can be found (Wüstner, 2005a). For selected regions of the plasma membrane, the ratio image (I_bleach) for the first (I₁) and second image (I₂) was calculated, which is related to the bleach rate according to (Brakenhoff et al., 1994):

(7)

Here, I_bleach is the bleach rate image, E is the time- and space invariant illumination intensity, is the bleach rate constant, t_d is a delay time, and I is the intensity in the last image of a bleach experiment. Because this intensity is almost zero for DHE-labeled HepG2 cells after repeated acquisition, the approximation in Eq. 7 is valid (Wüstner, 2005a). Brackets indicate pixel coordinates x, y for individual image planes. From Eq. 7, it becomes clear that in the bleach rate image only the pixel-dependent bleach rate is a contrast parameter. The method allows therefore to detect local differences in bleach rates of a fluorophore in a living cell (Brakenhoff et al., 1994).

Fluorescence measurements from single acquisitions may lead to erroneous estimates of total fluorescence due to the rapid photobleaching and/or self-quenching properties of DHE inserted into bilayers (Loura and Prieto, 1997; Wüstner, 2005a). Time-integrated fluorescence is independent of the quantum efficiency of the fluorophore, and its measurement allows for accurate and sensitive quantitation of total fluorescence (Mayor et al., 1993, and references therein). Total cell-associated fluorescence of DHE was determined by time-integrated photobleaching, where images of cells pulse-labeled with DHE/MCD were sequentially acquired until no fluorescence of DHE was left in the cells (Mayor et al., 1993; Wüstner, 2005a). A sum projection of such a bleach stack gives the total fluorescence of DHE in a cell. Importantly, the spatial labeling pattern of DHE in the plasma membrane did not differ between the sum projected image and a single acquisition image of the same field of cells (see Supplemental Material).

Image Segmentation by Active Contour Modeling
Snakes or active contour models are very suitable to segment irregular-shaped plasma membrane images of living cells. In this approach, a curve (snake) evolves from an initial position toward the boundary of an object (DHE-labeled cell) in such a way as to minimize some energy functional (Jacob et al., 2004). An ImageJ free-software Java plugin written by Dr. Bretschneider (Max-Planck-Institute of Biochemistry, Martinsried, Germany) was used (Dormann et al., 2002). Beside image energy minimization this plugin allows one to quantify fluorescence intensity along the defined boundary and to measure cell shape by defining second order geometric moments for calculation of a Legendre-Ellipse providing information about cell elongation and dispersion (for details, see Dormann et al., 2002; Gonzalez and Woods, 2002). The algorithm is therefore suitable to correlate plasma membrane intensity of DHE with membrane curvature and cell shape. These parameters were measured and analyzed by creating polar plots of curvature and intensity using SigmaPlot 9.0 (SPSS). To this end, node number i = 1, 100 was translated in degrees (0–360), whereas the polar plot radius represents either measured DHE intensity in the plasma membrane or membrane curvature. The algorithm was extensively tested using synthetic image sets which were generated as described above (see Supplemental Material).

Fluorescence Recovery after Photobleaching
HepG2 cells double labeled with DHE/MCD and -BODIPY-PC were placed on a temperature-controlled stage of a wide field microscope maintained at 35 ± 1°C. Based on the red channel image of -BODIPY-PC, the focus was set to the cell–substrate attachment region while taking the focal shift (chromatic aberration) of the DHE channel into account. FRAP experiments were performed as described previously with membrane folds visible in the red channel and labeled by -BODIPY-PC defined as region of interest (ROI) (Wüstner et al., 2002). Intensity of DHE measured in the ROI was divided by total cell-associated DHE fluorescence, normalized, and plotted as described previously (Wüstner et al., 2005).

	RESULTS

TOP ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION MATERIALS AND METHODS RESULTS DISCUSSION REFERENCES

 
Cell Surface Dynamics and DHE Fluorescence in the Plasma Membrane of Polarized Cells
Important characteristics of the polarized hepatocyte phenotype are the ability of cell attachment to the substratum accompanied by dynamical cell shape changes and formation of apical bile canaliculi (BC) (Sormunen et al., 1993). These BC resemble the thin channels (canaliculi biliferi) of the liver into which the bile fluid is secreted. HepG2 cells are able to change the diameter of the BC in cell culture as shown in Figure 1, A–E, by time-lapse DIC microscopy: over a time course of 90 min, an "open" BC was found to close accompanied by large dynamics in cell protrusions at the basolateral cell surface (see Supplemental Video sequence). BC contraction is a very slow process as indicated by the apparent half-time of BC closing of t_1/2 40 min (Figure 1E). Because this process is so slow, it might have been missed in previous investigations. Fluorescence imaging of DHE combined with high-resolution DIC microscopy can be used to visualize the surface topology of DHE-containing specimen. Using three-dimensional imaging on a wide field microscope, fluorescence of DHE could be detected in filopodia at the basolateral membrane of HepG2 cells (Figure 1F). Filopodia were found to protrude and retract during the time course of the experiment (Figure 1, A–D, and Supplemental Material). Protrusions containing DHE were also found at the apical canalicular membrane of polarized HepG2 cells. From z-stacks of DHE-labeled HepG2 cell couplets postprocessed by 3D maximum likelihood deconvolution, microvilli protruding into the BC lumen can be identified (Figure 1G). Using the same technique, it can be shown that BC with low diameter probably caused by BC contraction (see above) have a highly folded canalicular membrane labeled by DHE (Figure 1, H–K). For such BC with small diameter, it is impossible to resolve differences in DHE staining intensity from the raw image data giving an apparent filled BC lumen (Wüstner et al., 2002, 2005a). By 3D maximum likelihood deconvolution, however, it is possible to show that the canalicular membrane of those small BC is folded, revealing a small open BC lumen. This is supported by 3D reconstructions of the large-diameter (Figure 1G) and small-diameter BC (Figure 1, L and M, compare with H–K). The results indicate that also in the canalicular membrane, the fluorescence intensity of DHE is uneven, resembling a highly folded apical cell surface. The observed varying diameter of DHE-labeled BC with often an apparently filled BC lumen can be explained by dynamic contraction of BC, resulting in strong folding of the apical membrane (Wüstner et al., 2002; Wüstner, 2005a).

View larger version (76K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Figure 1. Surface dynamics and DHE staining pattern in polarized HepG2 cells. (A–D) DIC time-lapse series of a polarized HepG2 cell couplet showing slow closing of the central BC (big arrow) as well as periodic formation and retraction of filopodia at the basolateral cell surface (small arrows). E, quantification of BC closing from DIC images gives an approximative half-time of t1/2 40 min. (F–K) Cells were labeled for 1 min with DHE/MCD, washed, and imaged. Images were acquired in a stack along the optical axis, corrected for bleaching, and 3D deconvolved. F, sum projection of three central planes of the HepG2 couplet shown in A–D reveals DHE staining of filopodia extending from the basolateral cell surface. (G–K) Representative planes of a z-stack of DHE-labeled polarized HepG2 cells. (G) Open BC with large diameter shows microvilli protruding into the BC lumen. (H–K) Single planes of BC with very small diameter acquired along the z-axis being 0.5 µm apart starting from the largest diameter in H. (L and M) 3D reconstruction of the large-diameter (L) and the small-diameter BC (M) calculated from the whole z-stacks as described in Materials and Methods, reveals that both BC have a lumen with reduced DHE intensity compared with the brightly stained canalicular membrane. Bar, 20 µm (A–F) or 5 µm (G–K).

View larger version (100K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Figure 2. DHE staining of the plasma membrane reflects cell surface topography. HepG2 cells were pulse labeled with DHE/MCD for 1 min at 37°C, washed, and imaged. A 2D deconvolution algorithm implemented in the Huygens software (Scientific Volume Imaging) was applied to improve spatial resolution. DHE-labeled filopodia and microridges at the basolateral membrane (B), which match exactly structures in the corresponding DIC image (A). (C) Surface plot of the intensity distribution of DHE from the outlined region of the image in B. (D–M) Cells were pulse-labeled with DHE/MCD, washed, and immediately placed on a nitrogen-floated microscope stage of a wide field microscope maintained at 35 ± 1°C. Images were acquired every minute for a total time of 14 min. Images were postprocessed by applying a low pass filter implemented in Scion Image (Scion). D–G, a tubule connecting two HepG2 cells is shown that is labeled with DHE (arrows) and stable for at least 14 min (compare D with F). (G) Average image obtained from the first four acquisitions plus low pass filter to improve signal-to-noise ratio. (H) Zoomed version of G. Along the tubule, the DHE-labeling pattern is heterogeneous (arrowheads in H). This can be also inferred from the line scan along the central region of the tubule shown in H (I). (J–M) Representative inverted images of the time-lapse sequence show that a vesicle (arrowheads) moves from the cytoplasm toward the tubule in the upper cell being connected to the lower cell by the nanotube. Vesicles were also found at the site of nanotube–cell attachment in the upper cell (small arrows). Bar, 5 µm.

View larger version (139K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Figure 3. Visualization of DHE in the plasma membrane of TRVb1 cells. Cells were pulse-labeled with DHE/MCD for 1 min at 37°C, washed, and imaged. (A–C) CHO cells grow occasionally in an overlapping mode. In overlapping regions, DHE fluorescence (B) is exactly twice as high as in other flat plasma membrane areas as inferred from a line scan (C) of the intensity in contact regions (line in B). (A) Bright field image corresponding to B. (D–I) DHE is found in membrane tubules emanating from the cell surface. The variation in tubule diameter visible in the DIC image (D and H) is exactly matched by DHE fluorescence in the tubule (E and I). This can be clearly seen in the zoomed region (H and I) outlined by the box 2 in D and E. Emanating membrane tubules are often branched as visible in the DIC (F) and DHE channel (G) of the zoomed box 1 of the field shown in D and E. Bar, 10 µm.

View larger version (63K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Figure 4. Quantification of heterogeneous plasma membrane staining of DHE. (A–F) TRVb1 cells were pulse labeled with DHE/MCD for 1 min at 37°C, washed, and imaged. The surface topology of TRVb1 cells is characterized by a network of branching filopodia as well as many small infolds clearly visible in the transmitted light (A and E) and DHE channel (B, C, and F). Note that in A–C the focus was set to the largest cell diameter close to the glass surface of the microscope dish to visualize the cell perimeter as well as the branched filopodia. Images of DHE were inverted (B, C, and F) for better visualization. A line scan (red in C) along the plasma membrane perimeter measures fluorescence intensity of DHE determined from the noninverted image (D). The inverted image of a DHE-labeled cell revealed fluorescence spots on the base of membrane infolds (arrowheads in F) as well as in small cytoplasmic vesicles (arrows in F). (G and H) HepG2 cells were pulse-labeled with DHE/MCD for 1 min at 37°C, washed, and imaged. (I and J) Synthetic images of a cell were generated as described in Materials and Methods. Using the variance filter with a 7-pixel filter width a synthetic membrane image was generated and either Gaussian (I) or Poisson noise (J) was added. (K and L) line intensities along the synthetic plasma membrane + Poisson noise (J) were measured (L) and compared with intensities from DHE-labeled HepG2 cell (K). A running median filter was applied to smooth data (gray lines, raw data; black lines, filtered data). (M) HepG2 cells labeled with DHE as described were repeatedly illuminated, and line scans were measured along the plasma membrane after 1 (red line), 7 (blue line), or 15 acquisitions (cyan line). See text for further explanations. Bar, 5 µm.

View larger version (65K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Figure 5. Heterogeneous staining of DHE correlates locally but does not depend on large-scale membrane curvature. J774 cells were labeled for 5 min with DHE/MCD, washed, and imaged in z-stacking modus with planes being 0.5 µm apart. (A) individual planes of a J774 cell shown from the top. (B–D) Line scans along the perimeter of the cell shown in A for planes 0 and 1 (B), planes 2 and 3 (C), and planes 4 and 5 (D); the black and gray lines correspond to the first and second plane in B–D, respectively. (E) Correlation plot for the line scan data shown in B. Dots, data; straight line, linear fit. (F) Correlation coefficients calculated with a bivariate analysis between successive planes starting from plane 0 (black curve) or plane 2 (gray curve). (G–K) Parallel analysis of cell shape and DHE membrane intensity by using an active contour (snake) model. (G) Plane 3 of A with outlines snake contour (dotted line). (H) vertical slices of DHE from a 3D stack along the indicated directions. (I) Cell contour measured by the snake algorithm. (J) Curvature polar plot. (K) Intensity polar plot, where the angle (in degrees) indicates the node number for the snake, and the radius is measured curvature (J) or intensity (K), respectively. Lines indicate the different image planes (see A): plane 0 (black line), plane 3 (light gray line), and plane 5 (dark gray line).

View larger version (70K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Figure 6. DHE colocalizes with BODIPY-PC in attachment sites to the substratum. HepG2 cells were pulse labeled with DHE/MCD for 1 min at 37°C, washed, labeled with -BODIPY-PC for 1 min at 37°C, washed, and imaged on a wide field microscope in z-stacking modus. (A–C) DHE image stack was 3D deconvolved using Huygens software (Scientific Volume Imaging). Using the surface renderer and isocolocalization modus implemented in Huygens, a 3D surface reconstruction was calculated for DHE colocalizing with -BODIPY-PC in regions of cell–substrate attachment (D–E) or of two contacting cells (L and M). (F–H) DHE colocalizes with -BODIPY-PC in the membrane approaching the microscope slide in small patches (arrows). (I–K) Areas of cell–cell contact show increased fluorescence intensity of DHE and -BODIPY-PC (arrow). From the zoomed 3D surface reconstruction, it becomes obvious that this resembles a thickened membrane area, where the cells are in contact (M). (A, F, and I) DHE. (B, G, and J) -BODIPY-PC. (C, H, and K) Color overlay with DHE (green) and -BODIPY-PC (red) showing colocalizing regions in yellow/orange. Bar, 15 µm.

View larger version (134K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Figure 7. Bleach rate imaging and fluorescence recovery after photobleaching of DHE in membrane folds. (A–F) Bleach rate imaging of DHE: HepG2 cells were pulse labeled with DHE/MCD for 1 min at 37°C, washed, and repeatedly imaged on a widefield microscope using 2-s acquisition time. (A) DIC image corresponding to the DHE image (B) of the first acquisition shows a surface protrusion highly labeled by DHE (outlined box). Zoomed version of the region outlined in A and B is shown in C and D, respectively. (E) Same region for the second image acqusition. (F) Ratio image of the first and second acquired image. The ratio image has only the bleaching rate constant as contrast parameter. The absence of any contrast shows that DHE bleaching in the membrane fold is indistinguishable from the rest of the plasma membrane. (G–L) FRAP: HepG2 cells were double-labeled with DHE/MCD and -BODIPY-PC for 1 min at 37°C, washed, and placed on a temperature-controlled microscope stage maintained at 35 ± 1°C. The focus was set to the interface between cell and substrate (microscope slide). DHE was selectively bleached in regions of increased intensity likely representing folded membrane regions as judged based on the similar fluorescence pattern of -BODIPY-PC in this area (data not shown, but see outlined circle and Materials and Methods). The field aperture was opened and images were acquired at the indicated time points. Fluorescence recovery was measured in the outlined region (circle in G and see arrows) and plotted as function of time after normalization to total cell-associated DHE fluorescence (L). Bar, 10 µm.

View larger version (57K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Figure 8. DHE is not enriched in surface protrusions compared with BODIPY-PC. HepG2 cells were double labeled with DHE/MCD and -BODIPY-PC, washed, and imaged in z-stacking modus on a wide field microscope. Corresponding spatially registered planes were background corrected, and the ratio of the DHE image (B) and the -BODIPY-PC image (A) was calculated. This ratio image (C) was normalized and printed as 8-bit file. (D) PCA of the images in A and B provides two principal components named PC1 and PC2. Pixel intensities in PCA images range from –0.035 to +0.075 (see scale bar) for an 8-bit image format (0–255 possible pixel values), indicating that the difference between DHE and -BODIPY-PC membrane staining patterns is very low. Calculated eigenvalues l1 = 0.996 and l2 = 0.004 support that there is almost now data scattering (see Materials and Methods for further details on calculations). (E–H) Line intensities (F) measured for a plasma membrane region double labeled with DHE (green in E) and -BODIPY-PC (red in E, colcoalizing regions are yellow to orange). The intensity ratio measured along the line shown in E according to the intensity profiles in F is almost constant and close to 1 (G). A correlation plot of the line intensity profiles reveals high correlation of fluorescence of DHE and -BODIPY-PC (R = 0.86) (H, dots, pixel intensities; straight line, linear regression). Bar, 5 µm.

DHE Colocalizes with -BODIPY-PC in Plasma Membrane Blebs after Actin Disruption

View larger version (54K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Figure 9. Homogeneous staining of membrane blebs by DHE and -BODIPY-PC. (A, B, E, and F) HepG2 cells incubated in buffer medium ([–], A and E) or in medium containing 20 µM cytochalasin D for 20 min at 37°C ([+], B and F) were fixed with 3.3% PFA for 30 min, permeabilized, and incubated with Alexa488-phalloidin for 30 min at room temperature. Actin disruption removed actin staining associated with the basolateral membrane, whereas actin staining around the BC (arrows) was maintained. Actin stress fibers associated with the membrane close to the coverslip as found in control cells ([–], E) were disturbed after cytochalasin D treatment ([+], F). (C, D, G, and H) Cells were preincubated in the presence ([+], D and H) or absence ([–], C and G) of cytochalasin D, washed, and labeled with C6-NBD-PC for 1 min at 37°C. These cells were washed and chased for 30 min at 37°C in the presence or absence of the drug. BC (arrows) was brightly labeled in control and drug-treated cells. Compared with control cells (C and G), the canalicular membrane looked blebbed in cytochalasin D-treated cells as inferred from the fluorescence image of C6-NBD-PC (H) and the corresponding DIC image (D). (I) Cells treated with cytochalasin D and labeled with C6-NBD-PC as described above were washed and imaged at 37°C on a temperature-controlled nitrogen floated microscope stage maintained at 35 ± 1°C of a wide field microscope. Images were acquired every 1 min after washout of the drug, allowing for observation of resealing of a blebbed BC (arrow) in a time course of 12 min. (J and K) Cells treated with cytochalasin D were labeled for 1 min at 37°C with DHE, washed, and imaged. A blebbing BC stained with DHE (arrow) was found. (L–O) Cytochalasin D-treated cells were double labeled with DHE and -BODIPY-PC, washed, and imaged in z-stacking modus. Corresponding planes showing a membrane bleb were combined. DHE (L) colocalizes with -BODIPY-PC (M) along the perimeter of the bleb. (N) Color image with DHE (green) and -BODIPY-PC (red). (O and P) Bright field (O) and corresponding DHE image (Q) of a membrane bleb. A line scan was measured either exactly along the membrane bleb shown in P (line scan 1), shifted to the inner site of the bleb (line scan 2) or shifted parallel to the outside of the bleb measuring essential background intensity (line scan 3). (Q) Mean intensity ± SD of the line scans: 1, gray bar; 2, white bar; and 3, black bar. Bar, 10 µm (A–H) and 5 µm (L–N).

View larger version (80K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Figure 10. DHE colocalizes with cholera toxin in surface protrusions and the cleavage furrow of dividing cells. (A–L) BMGE cells were labeled with DHE/MCD for 1 min at 37°C, washed, and chilled with ice-cold buffer solution, placed on ice, and incubated for 25 min with 50 µg/ml Alexa488-CTxB. Cells were washed twice with cold and once with warmed buffer and imaged on a wide field microscope. DHE (B) and Alexa488-CTxB (C) show equal membrane staining in lamellopodia-like structures (A–D, arrowhead) and in long, thin tubules emanating from the cell surface (A–D, arrows). Both probes colocalize also in smooth surface areas in the plasma membrane (A'–D', inset). (D) Color overlay with DHE in green and Alexa488-CTxB in red. (E–S) BMGE cells were triple labeled with DHE (F, J, and O), Alexa488-CTxB (G, K, and N), and DiIC12 (H, L, and P). All three probes show homogeneous staining of the plasma membrane, including lamellopodia (E–H) and long branched tubules (I–L). DHE, Alexa488-CTxB, and DiIC12 show slight enrichment in the cleavage furrow of dividing BMGE cells (M–P). A line scan of color merged images of DHE and Alexa488-CTxB (R) or Alexa488-CTxB and DiIC12 (S) shows that DHE is less enriched in the furrow compared with the other two probes (Q). Colocalization is yellow to orange. (A, E, I, and M) DIC image of the respective fields. Bar, 10 µm, except 5 µm (M–P).

The raft hypothesis states that in the unperturbed plasma membrane cholesterol-enriched microdomains are very small. These steady-state rafts should be between 20 and 70 nm in diameter, far below the resolution limit of the light microscope (approx. 250 nm under best conditions) (Pralle et al., 2000; Sharma et al., 2004). Coalescence of those small domains to large optically resolvable rafts can be triggered by cross-linking of raft components, for example, by binding of antibodies against CTxB on the cell surface. By this method, it has been shown that certain membrane proteins having a raft preference by biochemical criteria (detergent extraction) but not other proteins copatch with GM1 in the plasma membrane (Harder et al., 1998). To determine whether local sterol enrichment in the plasma membrane can be triggered by patching raft components, BMGE cells labeled with DHE and Alexa488-CTxB were incubated with anti-CTxB antibody (Figure 11). There was a profound patching of Alexa488-CTxB induced by antibody cross-linking (Figure 11, C, K, and T). Those patches did not resemble plasma membrane folds as inferred from the corresponding DIC images (Figure 11, A, I, and R). Importantly, DHE did not copatch with Alexa488-CTxB, i.e., the sterol showed homogeneous membrane staining and did not become particularly enriched in Alexa488-CTxB patches (Figure 11, B, J, and S). DHE showed homogeneous staining in nanotubes between two cells having a constant diameter (Figure 11, E and F, see DIC image). In contrast, Alexa488-CTxB showed clustered staining along the nanotube (Figure 11, E–H, arrows). In membrane blebs lacking cytoskeleton support, Alexa488-CTxB but not DHE clustered in certain regions along the bleb outline (Figure 11, N–Q). Fluorescence intensities of DHE and Alexa488-CTxB measured along the cell perimeter of the cell in Figure 11, I–L, showed only low correlation as determined by a bivariate analysis (R = 0.45). This was similarly found for many other cells giving correlation coefficients R = 0.41–0.5. In contrast, those for DHE and Alexa488-CTxB without antibody cross-linking where as high as between DHE and -BODIPY-PC or DiIC12 (i.e., R >0.85; see above). Surface protrusions being homogeneously stained with DHE often completely lacked cross-linked Alexa488-CTxB (Figure 11, R–U). Together, the results demonstrate that fluorescent sterol does not become enriched in coalesced membrane rafts created by cross-linking of Alexa488-CTxB. These results were confirmed in other cell types (data not shown).

View larger version (78K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Figure 11. Patching of cholera toxin by antibody cross-linking does not affect DHE membrane distribution. (A–L) BMGE cells were labeled with DHE/MCD for 1 min at 37°C, washed, and chilled with ice-cold buffer solution, placed on ice, and incubated for 25 min with 50 µg/ml Alexa488-CTxB. Cells were washed twice with cold buffer and incubated with anti-CTxB antibody for 10 min on ice. Cells were washed and imaged as described in text. Although Alexa488-CTxB occurs in patches after antibody cross-linking (C, G, K, P, and T), DHE shows homogeneous membrane staining (B, F, J, O, and S) as found in control cells (compare Figure 10). Plasma membrane labeling of both probes in lamellopodia (A–D), nanotubes connecting two cells (E–H), along the cell perimeter (I–L), and in membrane blebs (N–Q) is shown. Alexa488-CTxB occurs in large optically resolvable patches (arrows). (M) Line scan along the perimeter of the cell shown in I–L for DHE (see J, black line) and Alexa488-CTxB (see K, red line). Inset shows a correlation plot with linear regression of the line intensity profile revealing low correlation between DHE and Alexa488-CTxB fluorescence (R = 0.45). (R–U) Surface ruffles visible in the DIC image (R, arrowheads) are strongly labeled by DHE (S) but lack any patched Alexa488-CTxB (T). Corresponding DIC images (A, E, I, N, and R) reveal the cell surface shape, whereas color merged images (D, H, L, Q, and U) show DHE in green and Alexa488-CTxB in red, respectively. Bar, 10 µm, except 5 µm (N–Q).

	DISCUSSION

TOP ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION MATERIALS AND METHODS RESULTS DISCUSSION REFERENCES

Apparent local enrichment of signaling proteins and lipid probes due to topological structuring of the cell surface has been reported previously: heterogeneous labeling pattern of DiI lipids in the plasma membrane could be assigned to surface folding-like microvilli at the apical membrane of polarized epithelial cells and at sites of cell–substrate attachment in macrophages, respectively (Sund et al., 1999; Colarusso and Spring, 2002). By confocal microscopy of adherent cells, it was found that green fluorescent protein (GFP)-tagged pleckstrin homology (PH) protein (GFP-PH) perfectly colocalizes with DiI lipid probes in membrane patches of medial and basal sections of neuroblastoma cells (van Rheenen and Jalink, 2002). These authors demonstrated with 15-nm resolution that observed membrane patches resemble surface folds and thereby higher local lipid content in the plasma membrane (van Rheenen and Jalink, 2002). Another study demonstrated that GFP-PH colocalizes with ld-preferring -BODIPY-PC in lateral patches and ruffles, being several micrometers in size at the cell surface of adipocytes. Those patches were zones of increased membrane traffic as shown by endocytosis of transferrin (Huang et al., 2004). Moreover, atomic force microscopy and transmission electron microscopy have shown that the surface of mammalian cells is densely occupied by microvilli-like structures with diameters between 0.2 and 1.5 µm (Braet et al., 1998). Using the lipid phase state-sensitive probe Laurdan, evidence has been presented that filopodia and cell–cell contact areas are in a lo-like phase being enriched in cholesterol (Gaus et al., 2003). This is in contradiction to the results presented here showing not only the absence of sterol enrichment in these plasma membrane regions but also a relative depletion of antibody cross-linked Alexa488-CTxB in filopodia (Figure 11, R–U). One has to be aware that Laurdan-generalized polarization reflects water permeability into the bilayer and thereby measures, indirectly, membrane condensation (Bagatolli and Gratton, 1999). The physical parameters controlling Laurdan fluorescence can be well controlled in model but not in cellular membranes. Moreover, it was recently shown that Laurdan can sense also other factors such as membrane tension, which is controlled by cytoskeleton–membrane adhesion in cells (Sheetz, 2001; Zhang et al., 2006).

Owing to the much higher signal of DHE in wide field compared with two-photon fluorescence microscopy, DHE could be detected in long, thin tubules emanating from the cell surface of varying cell types (Figures 2 and 3 and 10 and 11). Along tubules, DHE shows an uneven distribution (Figures 2, 3, and 10). It is demonstrated that this staining pattern is caused by varying diameter of the tubules, ruling out curvature-induced phase separation as cause for uneven DHE staining along plasma membrane tubes (Roux et al., 2005). The latter mechanism has been shown to operate in model membranes having fluorescent phospholipid probes with different partition behavior (Roux et al., 2005). Interestingly, the raft marker Alexa488-CTxB clustered along nanotubes, but only after antibody cross-linking (see Figure 11). Despite the absence of relative enrichment, sterol might have important functions in cell surface protrusions. Moreover, cholesterol is strongly required for membrane ruffling and pinocytosis in mammalian cells (Grimmer et al., 2002). Biogenesis of cell protrusions and membrane ruffles was found to depend either directly on cholesterol or on proteins that bind cholesterol, such as prominin (Corbeil et al., 2001; Grimmer et al., 2002). Thus, cholesterol might be fundamental for generation and maintenance of cell protrusions via stabilization of curved membranes and by site-directed sterol-dependent membrane traffic. Moreover, it was found that cholesterol loading of macrophages induces actin-dependent surface protrusions. Based on the presented results, it is suggested that sterol plays a similar important role in exchange of material between cells via nanotube connections (Önfelt and Davis, 2004; Önfelt et al., 2004).

Here, it is shown that DHE does not phase segregate from the fluid (ld)-preferring phospholipid -BODIPY-PC in plasma membrane blebs generated by actin disruption by using cytochalasin D (Figure 9). The homogeneous staining of DHE and -BODIPY-PC along the membrane bleb rules out that sterol molecules segregate and form separate domains in biological membranes. Patching of Alexa488-CTxB in the plasma membrane, including membrane blebs, does not induce a copatching of DHE. According to the raft hypothesis, lipids in the patched region should be in a lo-like state (Harder et al., 1998). Here, it is clearly demonstrated that sterol does not become particularly enriched in these patched regions (Figure 11). It is possible that equivalents to the lo and ld phase exist in cellular membranes; however, the results shown here indicate that cholesterol would be equally distributed between these phases. Moreover, recent studies in model membranes indicate that cholesterol is only slightly enriched in the lo compared with the ld phase (Veatch and Keller, 2002; Oradd et al., 2005). Moreover, cholesterol seems to be able to exchange rapidly between different lipid phases in model membranes (Oradd et al., 2005).

Cholesterol in cell surface protrusions might have an important function in sterol exchange between cells and lipoproteins. For example, the initial interaction of atherogenic lipoproteins with macrophages in the intima of vessel walls occurs in deep surface-connected compartments formed by the macrophage cell surface (Myers et al., 1993; Kruth et al., 1995; Buton et al., 1999). Similarly, sterol efflux from fibroblasts and macrophages to apolipoproteins occurs preferentially from cell surface protrusions (Lin and Oram, 2000). The high-density lipoprotein (HDL) receptor scavenger receptor BI (SR-BI), being important for plasma-to-bile transport of cholesterol, clusters in microvilli channels at the cell surface of mammalian cells (Reaven et al., 2001; Peng et al., 2004). Moreover, it was shown that expression of SR-BI in insect cells mediates formation of such cell protrusions (Reaven et al., 2001). The observations presented here indicate that sterol in hepatocyte surface protrusions could play an important role in selective uptake of sterol from HDL mediated by SR-BI at the basolateral membrane domain (Wüstner et al., 2004, 2005b). Further studies will be directed toward analysis of SR-BI cell surface distribution and dynamics in polarized hepatic cells.

	ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

 
I am grateful to Dr. Frederick R. Maxfield (Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY) who gave me the opportunity to use fluorescence microscopy instrumentation, reagents, and cell culture facilities for some of the experiments described in this article (supported by National Institutes of Health Grant DK-27083). Jesper S. Hansen is acknowledged for providing BMGE cells and for assistance in use. I acknowledge funding by grants of the Danish Heart Association Hjerteforeningen, the Diabetes Foundation Diabetesforeningen, as well as the Danish Research Agency Forskningsstyrelsen, Forskningsrådet for Natur og Univers.

	Footnotes

 
The online version of this contains supplemental material at MBC Online (http://www.molbiolcell.org).

This article was published online ahead of print in MBC in Press (http://www.molbiolcell.org/cgi/doi/10.1091/mbc.E06-05-0445) on October 25, 2006.

Address correspondence to: Daniel Wüstner (wuestner{at}bmb.sdu.dk)

Abbreviations used: Alexa488-CTxB, Alexa488-labeled cholera toxin subunit B; BC, biliary canaliculus; -BODIPY-PC, 2-(4,4-difluoro-5-(4-phenyl-1,3-butadienyl)-4-bora-3a,4a-diaza-s-indacene-3-pentanoyl)-1-hexa-decanoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine; BSA, bovine serum albumin; CE, cholesteryl ester; CHO, Chinese hamster ovary; CTxB, cholera toxin subunit B; C6-NBD-PC, 1-palmitoyl-2-[6-[(7-nitro-2–1,3-benzooxadiazol- 4-y) amino]caproyl]-sn-glycero-3-phosphatidylcholine; DHE, dehydroergosterol; DHE/MCD, dehydroergosterol/methyl--cyclodextrin complex; DiIC12, 1,1'-didodecyl-3,3,3',3'-tetramethylindocarbocyanine perchlorate; DiIC16, 1,1'-dihexadecyl-3,3,3',3'-tetramethylindocarbocyanine perchlorate; GFP-PH, green fluorescent protein-tagged pleckstrin homology protein; PC, phosphatidylcholine; PCA, principal component analysis; PFA, paraformaldehyde; ROI, region of interest; SR-BI, scavenger receptor BI; Tf, transferrin.

	REFERENCES

TOP ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION MATERIALS AND METHODS RESULTS DISCUSSION REFERENCES

 
Ahmed, S. N., Brown, D. A., London, E. (1997). On the origin of sphingolipid/cholesterol-rich detergent-insoluble cell membranes: physiological concentrations of cholesterol and sphingolipid induce formation of a detergent-insoluble, liquid-ordered lipid phase in model membranes. Biochemistry 36, 10944–10953.[CrossRef][Medline]

Bagatolli, L. A. and Gratton, E. (1999). Two-photon fluorescence microscopy observation of shape changes at the phase transition in phospholipid giant unilamellar vesicles. Biophys. J 77, 2090–2101.

Benninger, R. K., Önfelt, B., Neil, M. A., Davis, D. M., French, P. M. (2005). Fluorescence imaging of two-photon linear dichroism: cholesterol depletion disrupts molecular orientation in cell membranes. Biophys. J 88, 609–622.

Benson, D. M., Bryan, J., Plant, A. L., Gotto, A.M.J., Smith, L. C. (1985). Digital imaging fluorescence microscopy: spatial heterogeneity of photobleaching rate constants in individual cells. J. Cell Biol 100, 1309–1323.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Braet, F., Seynaeve, C., De Zanger, R., Wisse, E. (1998). Imaging surface and submembranous structures with the atomic force microscope: a study on living cancer cells, fibroblasts and macrophages. J. Microsc 190, 328–338.[Medline]

Brakenhoff, G. J., Visscher, K., Gijsbers, E. J. (1994). Fluorescence bleach rate imaging. J. Microsc 175, 154–161.

Bridgman, P. C. and Nakajima, Y. (1983). Distribution of filipin-sterol complexes on cultured muscle cells: cell-substratum contact areas associated with acetylcholine clusters. J. Cell Biol 96, 363–372.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Brown, P. S., Wang, E., Aroeti, B., Chapin, S. J., Mostov, K. E., Dunn, K. W. (2000). Definition of distinct compartments in polarized Madin-Darby canine kidney (MDCK) cells for membrane-volume sorting, polarized sorting and apical recycling. Traffic 1, 124–140.[CrossRef][Medline]

Buton, X., Mamdouh, Z., Ghosh, R. N., Du, H., Kuriakose, G., Beatini, N., Grabowski, G. A., Maxfield, F. R., Tabas, I. (1999). Unique cellular events occurring during the initial interaction of macrophages with matrix-retained or methylated aggregated low density lipoprotein (LDL). Prolonged cell-surface contact during which ldl-cholesteryl ester hydrolysis exceeds ldl protein degradation. J. Biol. Chem 274, 32112–32121.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Chong, P. L. and Thompson, T. E. (1986). Depolarization of dehydroergosterol in phospholipid bilayers. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 863, 53–62.[Medline]

Colarusso, P. and Spring, K. R. (2002). Reticulated lipid probe fluorescence reveals MDCK cell apical membrane topography. Biophys. J 82, 752–761.

Corbeil, D., Roper, K., Fargeas, C. A., Joester, A., Huttner, W. B. (2001). Prominin: a story of cholesterol, plasma membrane protrusions and human pathology. Traffic 2, 82–91.[CrossRef][Medline]

Cunningham, C. C. (1995). Actin polymerization and intracellular solvent flow in cell surface blebbing. J. Cell Biol 129, 1589–1599.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

de Almeida, R. F., Loura, L. M., Prieto, M., Watts, A., Fedorov, A., Barrantes, F. J. (2004). Cholesterol modulates the organization of the gammaM4 transmembrane domain of the muscle nicotinic acetylcholine receptor. Biophys. J 86, 2261–2272.

Dormann, D., Libotte, T., Weijer, C. J., Bretschneider, T. (2002). Simultaneous quantification of cell motility and protein-membrane-association using active contours. Cell Motil. Cytoskeleton 52, 221–230.[CrossRef][Medline]

Dubin-Thaler, B. J., Giannone, G., Döbereiner, H. G., Sheetz, M. P. (2004). Nanometer analysis of cell spreading on matrix-coated surfaces reveals two distinct cell states and STEPs. Biophys. J 86, 1794–1806.

Dunn, K. W. and Maxfield, F. R. (2003). Ratio imaging instrumentation. Methods Cell Biol 72, 389–413.[Medline]

Edidin, M. (2003). Lipids on the frontier: a century of cell-membrane bilayers. Nat. Cell Biol 4, 414–418.

Gaus, K., Gratton, E., Kable, E. P., Jones, A. S., Gelissen, I., Kritharides, L., Jessup, W. (2003). Visualizing lipid structure and raft domains in living cells with two-photon microscopy. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 100, 15554–15559.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Ghosh, R. N., Gelman, D. L., Maxfield, F. R. (1994). Quantification of low density lipoprotein and transferrin endocytic sorting in HEp2 cells using confocal microscopy. J. Cell Sci 107, 2177–2189.[Abstract]

Gonzalez, R. C. and Woods, R. E. (2002). Digital Image Processing, Chapter 11. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall,675–683.

Grimmer, S., Iversen, T. G., van Deurs, B., Sandvig, K. (2000). Endosome to Golgi transport of ricin is regulated by cholesterol. Mol. Biol. Cell 11, 4205–4216.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Grimmer, S., van Deurs, B., Sandvig, K. (2002). Membrane ruffling and macropinocytosis in A431 cells require cholesterol. J. Cell Sci 115, 2953–2962.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Hammond, A. T., Heberle, F. A., Baumgart, T., Holowka, D., Baird, B., Feigenson, G. W. (2005). Crosslinking a lipid raft component triggers liquid ordered-liquid disordered phase separation in model plasma membranes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102, 6320–6325.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Hao, M., Lin, S. X., Karylowski, O. J., Wüstner, D., McGraw, T. E., Maxfield, F. R. (2002). Vesicular and non-vesicular sterol transport in living cells. The endocytic recycling compartment is a major sterol storage organelle. J. Biol. Chem 277, 609–617.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Harder, T., Scheiffele, P., Verkade, P., Simons, K. (1998). Lipid domain structure of the plasma membrane revealed by patching of membrane components. J. Cell Biol 141, 929–942.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Hirschberg, K., Miller, C. M., Ellenberg, J., Presley, J. F., Siggia, E. D., Phair, R. D., Lippincott-Schwartz, J. (1998). Kinetic analysis of secretory protein traffic and characterization of Golgi to plasma membrane transport intermediates in living cells. J. Cell Biol 143, 1485–1503.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Holmes, T. J., Bhattacharyya, S., Cooper, J. A., Hanzel, D., Krishnamurthi, V., Lin, W.-C., Roysam, B., Szarowski, D. H., Turner, J. N. (1995). Light microscopic images reconstructed by maximum likelihood deconvolution. In: Handbook of Biological Confocal Microscopy, New York: Plenum Press, 389–402.

Huang, S., Lifshitz, L., Patki-Kamath, V., Tuft, R., Fogarty, K., Czech, M. P. (2004). Phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate-rich plasma membrane patches organize active zones of endocytosis and ruffling in cultured adipocytes. Mol. Cell. Biol 24, 9102–9123.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Huttner, W. B. and Zimmerberg, J. (2001). Implications of lipid microdomains for membrane curvature, budding and fission. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol 13, 478–484.[CrossRef][Medline]

Ipsen, J. H., Karlstrom, G., Mouritsen, O. G., Wennerstrom, H., Zuckermann, M. J. (1987). Phase equilibria in the phosphatidylcholine-cholesterol system. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 905, 162–172.[Medline]

Jacob, M., Blu, T., Unser, M. (2004). Efficient energies and algorithms for parametric snakes. IEEE Trans. Image Process 13, 1231–1244.[CrossRef][Medline]

Koppel, D. E., Oliver, J. M., Berlin, R. D. (1982). Surface functions during mitosis. III. Quantitative analysis of ligand-receptor movement into the cleavage furrow: diffusion vs. flow. J. Cell Biol 93, 950–960.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Korlach, J., Schwille, P., Webb, W. W., Feigenson, G. W. (1999). Characterization of lipid bilayer phases by confocal microscopy and fluorescence correlation spectroscopy. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96, 8461–8466.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Kruth, H. S., Skarlatos, S. I., Lilly, K., Chang, J., Ifrim, I. (1995). Sequestration of acetylated LDL and cholesterol crystals by human monocyte-derived macrophages. J. Cell Biol 129, 133–145.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Kusumi, A., Koyama-Honda, I., Suzuki, K. (2004). Molecular dynamics and interactions for creation of stimulation-induced stabilized rafts from small unstable steady-state rafts. Traffic 5, 213–230.[CrossRef][Medline]

Lin, G. and Oram, J. F. (2000). Apolipoprotein binding to protruding membrane domains during removal of excess cellular cholesterol. Atherosclerosis 149, 359–370.[CrossRef][Medline]

Liu, F., Sugar, I. P., Chong, P. L. (1997). Cholesterol and ergosterol superlattices in three-component liquid crystalline lipid bilayers as revealed by dehydroergosterol fluorescence. Biophys. J 72, 2243–2254.

Loura, L. M. and Prieto, M. (1997). Dehydroergosterol structural organization in aqueous medium and in a model system of membranes. Biophys. J 72, 2226–2236.

Maxfield, F. R. (2002). Plasma membrane microdomains. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol 14, 483–487.[CrossRef][Medline]

Maxfield, F. R. and Wüstner, D. (2002). Intracellular cholesterol transport. J. Clin. Investig 110, 891–898.[CrossRef][Medline]

Mayor, S., Presley, J. F., Maxfield, F. R. (1993). Sorting of membrane components from endosomes and subsequent recycling to the cell surface occurs by a bulk flow process. J. Cell Biol 121, 1257–1269.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

McGraw, T. E., Greenfield, L., Maxfield, F. R. (1987). Functional expression of the human transferrin receptor cDNA in Chinese hamster ovary cells deficient in endogenous transferrin receptor. J. Cell Biol 105, 207–214.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Mukherjee, S., Soe, T. T., Maxfield, F. R. (1999). Endocytic sorting of lipid analogues differing solely in the chemistry of their hydrophobic tails. J. Cell Biol 144, 1271–1284.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Mukherjee, S., Zha, X., Tabas, I., Maxfield, F. R. (1998). Cholesterol distribution in living cells: fluorescence imaging using dehydroergosterol as a fluorescent cholesterol analog. Biophys. J 75, 1915–1925.

Myers, J. N., Tabas, I., Jones, N. L., Maxfield, F. R. (1993). beta-Very low density lipoprotein is sequestered in surface-connected tubules in mouse peritoneal macrophages. J. Cell Biol 123, 1389–1402.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Ng, M. M., Chang, F., Burgess, D. R. (2005). Movement of membrane domains and requirement of membrane signaling molecules for cytokinesis. Dev. Cell 9, 781–790.[CrossRef][Medline]

Oradd, G., Westerman, P. W., Lindblom, G. (2005). Lateral diffusion coefficients of separate lipid species in a ternary raft-forming bilayer: a Pfg-NMR multinuclear study. Biophys. J 89, 315–320.

Önfelt, B. and Davis, D. M. (2004). Can membrane nanotubes facilitate communication between immune cells? Biochem. Soc. Trans 32, 676–678.[CrossRef][Medline]

Önfelt, B., Nedvetzki, S., Yanagi, K., Davis, D. M. (2004). Cutting edge: Membrane nanotubes connect immune cells. J. Immunol 173, 1511–1513.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Peng, Y., Akmentin, W., Connelly, M. A., Lund-Katz, S., Phillips, M. C., Williams, D. L. (2004). Scavenger receptor BI (SR-BI) clustered on microvillar extensions suggests that this plasma membrane domain is a way station for cholesterol trafficking between cells and high-density lipoprotein. Mol. Biol. Cell 15, 384–396.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Pralle, A., Keller, P., Florin, E. L., Simons, K., Horber, J. K. (2000). Sphingolipid-cholesterol rafts diffuse as small entities in the plasma membrane of mammalian cells. J. Cell Biol 148, 997–1008.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Reaven, E., Leers-Sucheta, S., Nomoto, A., Azhar, S. (2001). Expression of scavenger receptor class B type 1 (SR-BI) promotes microvillar channel formation and selective cholesteryl ester transport in a heterologous reconstituted system. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98, 1613–1618.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Robinson, J. M. and Karnovsky, M. J. (1980). Specializations in filopodial membranes at points of attachment to the substrate. J. Cell Biol 87, 562–568.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Roux, A., Cuvelier, D., Nassoy, P., Prost, J., Bassereau, P., Goud, B. (2005). Role of curvature and phase transition in lipid sorting and fission of membrane tubules. EMBO J 24, 1537–1545.[CrossRef][Medline]

Rowe, D. and Hoffmann, R. G. (2006). Multivariate statistical analysis in fMRI. IEEE Eng. Med. Biol 25, 60–64.[Medline]

Rustom, A., Saffrich, R., Markovic, I., Walther, P., Gerdes, H.-H. (2004). Nanotubular highways for intercellular organelle transport. Science 303, 1007–1010.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Salzmann, N. H. and Maxfield, F. R. (1989). Fusion accessibility of endocytic compartments along the recycling and lysosomal endocytic pathways in intact cells. J. Cell Biol 109, 2097–2104.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Schmid, E., Schiller, D. L., Grund, C., Stadler, J., Franke, W. W. (1983). Tissue type-specific expression of intermediate filament proteins in a cultured epithelial cell line from bovine mammary gland. J. Cell Biol 96, 37–50.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Sharma, P., Varma, R., Sarasij, R. C., Ira, R. C., Gousset, K., Krishnamoorthy, G., Rao, M., Mayor, S. (2004). Nanoscale organization of multiple GPI-anchored proteins in living cell membranes. Cell 116, 577–589.[CrossRef][Medline]

Shaw, J. E., Epand, R. F., Epand, R. M., Li, Z., Bittman, R., Yip, C. M. (2006). Correlated fluorescence-atomic force microscopy of membrane domains: structure of fluorescence probes determines lipid localization. Biophys. J 90, 2170–2178.

Sheetz, M. P. (2001). Cell control by membrane cytoskeleton adhesion. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol 2, 392–396.[CrossRef][Medline]

Simons, K. and Ikonen, E. (1997). Functional rafts in cell membranes. Nature 387, 569–572.[CrossRef][Medline]

Smutzer, G., Crawford, B. F., Yeagle, P. L. (1986). Physical properties of the fluorescent sterol probe dehydroergosterol. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 862, 361–371.[Medline]

Sormunen, R., Eskelinen, S., Lehto, V. P. (1993). Bile canaliculus formation in cultured HEPG2 cells. Lab. Investig 68, 652–662.[Medline]

Spink, C. H., Yeager, M. D., Feigenson, G. W. (1990). Partitioning behavior of indocarbocyanine probes between coexisting gel and fluid phases in model membranes. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1023, 25–33.[Medline]

Sund, S. E., Swanson, J. A., Axelrod, D. (1999). Cell membrane orientation visualized by polarized total internal reflection fluorescence. Biophys. J 77, 2266–2283.

Tank, D. W., Wu, E.-S., Webb, W. W. (1982). Enhanced molecular diffusibility in muscle membrane blebs: release of lateral constraints. J. Cell Biol 92, 207–212.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Thevenaz, P., Ruttimann, U. E., Unser, E. (1998). A pyramid approach to subpixel registration based on intensity. IEEE Trans. Image Process 7, 27–41.[Medline]

Tulenko, T. N., Chen, M., Mason, P. E., Mason, R. P. (1998). Physical effects of cholesterol on arterial smooth muscle membranes: evidence of immiscible cholesterol domains and alterations in bilayer width during atherogenesis. J. Lipid Res 39, 947–956.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

van Rheenen, J. and Jalink, K. (2002). Agonist-induced PIP(2) hydrolysis inhibits cortical actin dynamics: regulation at a global but not at a micrometer scale. Mol. Biol. Cell 13, 3257–3267.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Veatch, S. L. and Keller, S. L. (2002). Organization in lipid membranes containing cholesterol. Phys. Rev. Lett 89, 268101.[CrossRef][Medline]

Verveer, P. J., Gemkow, M. J., Jovin, T. M. (1999). A comparison of image restoration approaches applied to three-dimensional confocal and wide-field fluorescence microscopy. J. Microsc 193, 50–61.[Medline]

Vist, M. R. and Davis, J. H. (1990). Phase equilibria of cholesterol/ dipalmitoylphosphatidylcholine mixtures: 2H nuclear magnetic resonance and differential scanning calorimetry. Biochemistry 29, 451–464.[CrossRef][Medline]

Weikl, T. R. and Lipowsky, R. (2004). Pattern formation during T-cell adhesion. Biophys. J 87, 3665–3678.

Wüstner, D. (2005a). Improved visualization and quantitative analysis of fluorescent membrane sterol in polarized hepatic cells. J. Microsc 220, 47–64.[Medline]

Wüstner, D. (2005b). Mathematical analysis of hepatic high density lipoprotein transport based on quantitative imaging data. J. Biol. Chem 280, 6766–6779.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Wüstner, D., Herrmann, A., Hao, M., Maxfield, F. R. (2002). Rapid nonvesicular transport of sterol between the plasma membrane domains of polarized hepatic cells. J. Biol. Chem 277, 30325–30336.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Wüstner, D., Mondal, M., Huang, A., Maxfield, F. R. (2004). Different transport routes for high density lipoprotein and its associated free sterol in polarized hepatic cells. J. Lipid Res 45, 427–437.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Wüstner, D., Mondal, M., Tabas, I., Maxfield, F. R. (2005). Direct observation of rapid internalization and intracellular transport of sterol by macrophage foam cells. Traffic 6, 396–412.[CrossRef][Medline]

Wüstner, D., Mukherjee, S., Maxfield, F. R., Müller, P., Hermann, A. (2001). Vesicular and nonvesicular transport of phosphatidylcholine in polarized HepG2 cells. Traffic 2, 277–296.[CrossRef][Medline]

Yeagle, P. L., Bensen, J., Boni, L., Hui, S. W. (1982). Molecular packing of cholesterol in phospholipid vesicles as probed by dehydroergosterol. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 692, 139–146.[CrossRef]

Yin, C., Liao, K., Mao, H. Q., Leong, K. W., Zhuo, R. X., Chan, V. (2003). Adhesion contact dynamics of HepG2 cells on galactose-immobilized substrates. Biomaterials 24, 837–850.[CrossRef][Medline]

Zamir, E., Katz, B. Z., Aota, S., Yamada, K. M., Geiger, B., Kam, Z. (1999). Molecular diversity of cell-matrix adhesions. J. Cell Sci 112, 1655–1669.[Abstract]

Zhang, W., McIntosh, A. L., Xu, H., Wu, D., Gruninger, T., Atshaves, B., Liu, J. C., Schroeder, F. (2005). Structural analysis of sterol distributions in the plasma membrane of living cells. Biochemistry 44, 2864–2884.[CrossRef][Medline]

Zhang, Y. L., Frangos, J. A., Chachisvillis, M. (2006). Laurdan fluorescence senses mechanical strain in the lipid bilayer membrane. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun 347, 838–841.[CrossRef][Medline]

Zuckermann, M. J., Ipsen, J. H., Miao, L., Mouritsen, O. G., Nielsen, M., Polson, J., Thewalt, J., Vattulainen, I., Zhu, H. (2004). Modeling lipid-sterol bilayers: applications to structural evolution, lateral diffusion, and rafts. Methods Enzymol 383, 198–229.[Medline]

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. Mondal, B. Mesmin, S. Mukherjee, and F. R. Maxfield Sterols Are Mainly in the Cytoplasmic Leaflet of the Plasma Membrane and the Endocytic Recycling Compartment in CHO Cells Mol. Biol. Cell, January 1, 2009; 20(2): 581 - 588. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				N. H. Petersen, N. J. Faergeman, L. Yu, and D. Wustner Kinetic imaging of NPC1L1 and sterol trafficking between plasma membrane and recycling endosomes in hepatoma cells J. Lipid Res., September 1, 2008; 49(9): 2023 - 2037. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) Supplemental Material All Versions of this Article: E06-05-0445v1 18/1/211    most recent Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Wüstner, D. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Wüstner, D.