|
|
|
|
Vol. 18, Issue 3, 986-994, March 2007
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||







Departments of *Medical Sciences and ¶Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Piemonte Orientale, 28100 Novara, Italy; Divisions of
Anatomy and
Pharmacology, Department of Anatomy, Pharmacology, and Forensic Medicine, University of Torino, 10125 Torino, Italy; ||Department of Traumatology, Orthopaedics and Occupational Medicine, University of Torino, 10126 Torino, Italy; and
Centro di Ricerca E. Menni, Fondazione Poliambulanza-Istituto Ospedaliero, 25124 Brescia, Italy
Submitted May 8, 2006;
Revised November 9, 2006;
Accepted December 21, 2006
Monitoring Editor: Carl-Henrik Heldin
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Des-acyl ghrelin (D-GHR), the unacylated form of GHR, whose concentration in plasma and tissues is higher than that of GHR, does not bind GHSR-1a and is devoid of any central activity on GH release, appetite and adiposity. These observations initially suggested that D-GHR might act as a reservoir of inactive GHR. However, an increasing body of evidence indicates that D-GHR shares with GHR many biological activities and common binding sites on several peripheral tissues and cell types. Indeed, both GHR and D-GHR inhibit apoptosis and recognize common binding sites in H9c2 cardiomyocytes (Baldanzi et al., 2002
); inhibit proliferation and recognize common binding sites in breast and prostate carcinoma cells (Jeffery et al., 2002
; Cassoni et al., 2001
); stimulate proliferation of preosteoblastic as well as GH3 pituitary cells (Fukushima et al., 2005
; Maccarinelli et al., 2005
; Nanzer et al., 2004
; Delhanty et al., 2006
); stimulate differentiation of osteoblasts in vitro (Delhanty et al., 2006
); and adipogenesis in vivo (Choi et al., 2003
), and activate ERK-1/2 and Akt signaling pathways, which mediate their antiapoptotic and proliferative responses.
In most, but not all, of the cells where D-GHR activity was investigated, GHSR-1a is not expressed, strongly suggesting that such pleiotropic activities of both GHR and D-GHR may be mediated by a yet unidentified receptor. In summary, these data indicate that D-GHR shares a subset of biological activities with ghrelin in peripheral tissues through an unidentified receptor distinct from GHSR-1a.
In vivo, GHR treatment has been reported to ameliorate chronic heart failure- and cancer-induced cachexia, whereas its plasma concentration is increased in cachectic patients (Nagaya et al., 2001
, 2005
; Granado et al., 2005
). However, no studies have addressed whether GHR may act directly on the muscle. Intriguingly, binding sites for hexarelin, a synthetic GHS, have been observed in skeletal muscle (Papotti et al., 2000
). Based on these observations, we investigated GHR and D-GHR biological activities in skeletal muscle myoblasts.
Skeletal muscle satellite cells are mononucleated myoblasts, which, upon muscle diseases or direct injury, are activated to undergo proliferation and eventually differentiate to form new muscle fibers to allow muscle regeneration. In vivo, differentiation of skeletal muscle involves first the growth factor-sustained expansion of the population of skeletal myoblasts and then cell cycle exit and initiation of terminal differentiation, which involves expression of contractile proteins and formation of multinucleated syncitia by myocytes fusion. The extracellular signals triggering growth arrest and the molecular mechanisms involved in the induction of myoblasts differentiation and fusion still remain to be fully elucidated.
In vitro, muscle differentiation steps can be reproduced with myoblastic satellite-derived cell lines, such as the C2C12 murine myoblast cells used in this study. C2C12 myoblasts proliferate in presence of 10% fetal calf serum (FCS) (growth medium; GM), and undergo differentiation when cultured in 2% horse serum (differentiation medium; DM).
Herein, we provide data demonstrating that both GHR and D-GHR act on skeletal myoblasts by inhibiting cell proliferation and by promoting muscle differentiation and fusion.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Cell Cultures
C2C12 myoblasts were grown at low density in a proliferative medium (GM) consisting in DMEM supplemented with 10% FCS (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA), 100 U/ml penicillin, 100 µg/ml streptomycin, and 0.25 µg/ml antimycotic. To induce differentiation, cells were allowed to become confluent, and the medium was switched to DM consisting in DMEM supplemented with 2% horse serum, penicillin, streptomycin, and antimycotic as described above.
Western Blot
After the indicated treatments, cells were washed in ice-cold phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and solubilized with a lysis buffer containing 25 mM HEPES, pH 8, 135 mM NaCl, 5 mM EDTA, 1 mM EGTA, 1 mM ZnCl2, 50 mM NaF 50, 1% NP-40, 10% glycerol, 0.05 mg/ml leupeptin, 0.005 mg/ml pepstatin, 200 µM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, and 1 mM Na3VO4. Lysates were stirred at 4°C for 15 min and centrifuged at 13,000 x g for 15 min at 4°C. Protein concentration was determined by Bio-Rad protein assay (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA). Proteins (2050 µg protein/lane) were separated by 512% SDS-PAGE and transferred to polyvinylidene difluoride filters (Hybond-P; GE Healthcare, Little Chalfont, Buckinghamshire, United Kingdom). Membranes were incubated with the primary antibodies, washed with Tris-buffered saline/0.1% Tween, incubated with the appropriate secondary antibody (PerkinElmer Life and Analytical Sciences, Boston, MA), visualized with Western Lightning Chemiluminescence Reagent Plus (PerkinElmer Life and Analytical Sciences), acquired with VersaDoc 3000 (Bio-Rad), and analyzed with Quantity One software (Bio-Rad). Equal protein loading was further controlled by Ponceau red staining. After anti-phospho-Akt and anti-phospho-ERK-1/2, membranes were stripped with ReBlot Plus (Chemicon International, Temecula, CA) and reblotted with the corresponding total protein antibodies.
Immunofluorescence
Cells were plated on 24-well plates and treated as indicated. At the end of the treatments, cells were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde, permeabilized with 0.5% Triton X-100, and incubated with anti-MHC followed by incubation with the secondary antibody and 4,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI), and visualized by fluorescence microscopy (Axiovert 40; Carl Zeiss, Jena, Germany). Each treatment was in triplicate, and each experiment was repeated at least two times. Images were acquired (10 fields/well) and analyzed to determine differentiation and fusion indexes.
Differentiation Index and Fusion Index
To quantify the differentiation and fusion of C2C12 cells after treatments, we calculated the differentiation index as the percentage of MHC-positive cells above total nuclei and the fusion index as the average number of nuclei in MHC-positive cells with at least three nuclei above total number of nuclei, respectively.
Cell Proliferation
C2C12 cells were starved overnight in 0.2% FCS and then maintained for 24 h with or without GHR and D-GHR in GM to evaluate the inhibition of proliferation. At the end of treatments, cells were incubated with 2 µCi/ml [3H]thymidine (GE Healthcare) for 3 h, washed with PBS, treated with 5% trichloroacetic acid (TCA) to precipitate proteins and DNA, and finally lysed by adding 0.5 M NaOH and 0.5% SDS. Positive control for proliferation was GM, whereas negative control was 0.2% FCS. The amount of incorporated [3H]thymidine was evaluated by beta-counter (Tri-Carb 2800TR; Perkin Elmer) analysis. The data presented here are the average of triplicate assays, and similar results were obtained in at least three independent experiments.
p38 Kinase Assay
The ability of GHR and D-GHR to activate p38 was assayed by a specific p38 nonradioactive kinase assay kit from Cell Signaling Technology, according to the protocol provided by the supplier. Briefly, after the indicated treatments, cells were solubilized with a lysis buffer, the phosphorylated p38 was immunoprecipitated, and an in vitro kinase assay was performed using activating transcription factor (ATF)-2 as a substrate. Phosphorylated ATF-2 was finally detected by Western blotting.
Generation of the Ghrelin-expressing Lentiviral Vector (MA1-GHR)
Total RNA from mouse stomach, mechanically triturated in liquid nitrogen, was extracted by TRIzol (Invitrogen), following the manufacturer's instructions. The RNA obtained was retrotranscribed, and the cDNA was used to clone the total ghrelin in the lentiviral vector MA1 (pCCL.sin.PPT.polyA. CTE.eGFP.minhCMV.hPGK.WPRE), a kind gift from Prof. L. Naldini (HSR-Tiget, Milan, Italy), containing a synthetic bidirectional promoter that simultaneously promotes the transcription of two divergent mRNA sequences, one sequence of which encoded for an enhanced green fluorescent protein (EGFP) (Amendola et al., 2005
). The generated construct has been transfected in myoblasts to verify the ability of this MA1-GHR vector to afford in vitro the expression of the ghrelin gene. Cells were transfected with Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen), according to the manufacturer's instructions.
Radioimmunoassay (RIA) Analysis
The ability of MA1-GHR vector to afford the expression of the GHR gene in C2C12 myoblasts and the secretion of the hormone in culture medium was assayed by a specific RIA kit from Phoenix Pharmaceuticals (Belmont, CA), according to the protocol provided by the supplier.
GHSR-1a Expression
Total RNA from cultured cells was extracted by Nucleospin RNA II (Macherey- Nagel, Düren, Germany) following the manufacturer's instructions, whereas RNA from mouse brain, mechanically triturated in liquid nitrogen, was extracted by TRIzol (Invitrogen). The RNA obtained was retrotranscribed with SuperScript reverse transcriptase II (Invitrogen). The quality of cDNAs has been assessed by glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) amplification, and then reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) of GHSR-1a was performed using DNAzyme EXT polymerase (Finnzymes, Espoo, Finland) and the following primers: GHSR-1a exon 1-for 5'-AGTATCGGCCCTGGAACTT-3', GHSR-1a exon 1-rev 5'-ACGCTCGACACCCATACCAT-3', GHSR-1a exon 2-for 5'-TGGTGTTTGCTTTCATCCTC-3', GHSR-1a exon 2-rev 5'-CGGGAACTCTCATCCTTCAGA-3', GHSR-1a complete-for 5'-AAGGTGGTGGTCACCAAGG-3', and GHSR-1a complete-rev 5'-CGGTACTTCTTGGACATGATG-3'.
Ghrelin Binding Assay
Tyr4-GHR was radioiodinated (125I-Tyr4-GHR; specific activity 2000 Ci/mmol) by using a lactoperoxidase method by GE Healthcare and used as a radioligand in the binding studies. Tyr4-GHR has been reported to be a reliable probe for labeling GHS-R in tissue or cell membranes and to retain the same GH-releasing potency of the native peptide (Muccioli et al., 2001
, 2004
; Baldanzi et al., 2002
).
Binding of 125I-Tyr4-GHR to crude C2C12 myoblast membranes (30,000 x g pellet), and saturation binding analysis were determined as described previously (Muccioli et al., 2001
, 2004
). IC50 values of specific radioligand binding were determined by radioligand ghrelin displacement curves with increasing concentrations of unlabeled GHR, D-GHR, GHR-(9-28) fragment, or motilin. The maximal number of binding sites (Bmax), the dissociation constant (Kd), and the IC50 values were calculated with the iterative curve-fitting Prism 4 program (GraphPad Software Inc., San Diego, CA).
Statistical Analysis
Where appropriate, data are presented as the mean ± SEM, and the statistical significance was assessed using Student's t test.
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
GHR and D-GHR induce muscle differentiation and fusion of proliferating C2C12 myoblasts in GM (10% FCS), as shown by immunofluorescence microscopy with anti-MHC antibodies. Figure 1A shows typical immunofluorescence images obtained from C2C12 skeletal muscle cells cultured for 72 h in GM in presence or absence of either 10 nM GHR or 10 nM D-GHR. Cells positive for MHC, a marker for terminal differentiation, are red stained, whereas nuclei are blue stained (DAPI). In a representative field of C2C12 cells maintained in GM, only a single MHC-positive cell is visible, but no multinucleated tubes are present, indicating a minimal spontaneous differentiation tendency. In representative fields of C2C12 cells in GM treated with 10 nM GHR or D-GHR, respectively, both single-nucleated MHC-positive cells and multinucleated myotubes are clearly visible.
|
Differentiation index of C2C12 myoblasts is significantly increased in a concentration-dependent manner upon 96 h of treatment with rising concentrations of either GHR or D-GHR in GM. Maximal response was observed at 10 nM, whereas minimum significant differentiation was already observed at 1 nM (Figure 1, B and C). Differentiation was already evident and significant upon 48 and 72 h of treatment (Figure 1D).
In addition, the differentiating activity of GHR and D-GHR is not limited to stimulating MHC expression; it also induces myocyte fusion to form multinucleated syncitial myotubes. Fusion index of myocytes cultured in presence of either 10 nM GHR or D-GHR was increased up to 20- to 25-fold after 72 h of treatments, compared with untreated control myoblasts in GM (Figure 1E). Thus, these data clearly show that both GHR and D-GHR activate a complete differentiation program in C2C12 skeletal myoblasts driving both expression of contractile proteins and cellular events leading to the formation of multinucleated myotubes.
Ghrelin and Des-Acyl Ghrelin Induce the Expression of Early and Late Markers of Skeletal Muscle Differentiation in C2C12 Myoblasts
To consolidate the observation that indeed GHR and D-GHR activate a differentiating program in skeletal myoblasts, we have verified the ability of both GHR and D-GHR to induce the expression of myogenin and MHC proteins, as detected by Western blot. While MHC is a late differentiation marker, myogenin is a helix-loop-helix transcription factor whose expression is induced early in differentiation, preceding cell cycle exit (Andres and Walsh, 1996
; Zhang et al., 1999
).
C2C12 cells cultured in GM were treated with 10 nM GHR or D-GHR or switched to DM for either 24 or 72 h. Expression of myogenin and MHC was measured by Western blot of whole cell lysates, and the intensity of the bands was quantified. Figure 2A shows that upon 24-h treatment with both GHR and D-GHR the expression of myogenin is significantly increased compared with control cells in GM, at similar extent of the expression induced by DM. Moreover, upon 72-h treatment, when multinucleated myotubes are formed, the expression of the terminal differentiation marker MHC was significantly induced (Figure 2B). These results confirm that GHR and D-GHR are able to promote both early and late steps of skeletal muscle differentiation in GM.
|
Growing C2C12 myoblasts were starved overnight in 0.2% FCS to synchronize their cell cycles, and then they were maintained for 24 h in GM with or without 10 nM GHR and D-GHR. As positive control of inhibition of proliferation, cells were maintained in 0.2% FCS. Either GHR or D-GHR in GM inhibit DNA synthesis of C2C12 myoblasts of
25% compared with control cells (Figure 3).
|
40% (Figure 4B), and abolished fusion (Figure 4C), induced by 72-h treatment with 10 mM GHR and D-GHR.
|
|
C2C12 cells transiently expressing either EGFP alone or EGFP and GHR were induced to differentiate in DM. After 72 h from transfection, differentiation index of ghrelin-overexpressing cells is increased by
45% compared with EGFP-expressing cells. Similarly, fusion index is also increased by
80% compared with control cells. Untransfected cells feature differentiation and fusion indexes similar to those of cells expressing EGFP alone, indicating that the viral construct does not affect differentiation and fusion by itself (Figure 6).
|
|
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Skeletal muscle regeneration involves, sequentially, satellite cell proliferation, commitment to terminal differentiation, cell fusion into multinucleated syncitia, and muscle fiber formation.
Such mechanisms leading to muscle regeneration are poorly understood; they seem to recapitulate the embryonic program of differentiation, although the extracellular factors regulating such processes may be different.
Satellite cell differentiation into skeletal muscle can be subdivided into temporally separable events, coordinated by the expression of proteins of the muscle regulatory factors family, such as myogenin, and of cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor of the p21 family (Andres and Walsh, 1996
), resulting in cell cycle exit and commitment to terminal differentiation. Later on, expression of muscle contractile proteins, such as MHCs and myosin light chains (MLCs), are hallmarks of phenotypic differentiation. Finally, fusion of myocytes into multinucleated myotubes is the terminal step of muscle differentiation.
The growing interest in skeletal muscle regeneration is associated to the opening of new therapeutic strategies for several muscular degenerative pathologies such as dystrophies, muscular atrophy, and cachexia associated to aging, cancer, chronic heart failure, and acquired immunodeficiency syndrome as well as the treatments of skeletal muscle injury after trauma.
Although GHR is a circulating hormone mainly secreted by the stomach, it is also synthesized in a number of tissues, suggesting both endocrine and paracrine effects (Gnanapavan et al., 2002
).
The evidence that 1) GHR up-regulation is specifically associated to either congestive heart failure (CHF)- or cancer-induced cachexia (Nagaya et al., 2001
, Shimizu et al., 2003
) and that its administration strongly prevents CHF-associated cachexia (Nagaya et al., 2004
); 2) GHR, D-GHR, and GHSs inhibit apoptosis of cardiac myocytes (Filigheddu et al., 2001
; Baldanzi et al., 2002
); and 3) skeletal muscle features high binding sites for synthetic GHSs (Papotti et al., 2000
), lead us to speculate that GHR and D-GHR may act directly also on skeletal muscle. Indeed, we observed that both GHR and D-GHR stimulate tyrosine phosphorylation of several proteins and activate ERK-1/2 and Akt (data not shown), indicating that both factors could exert a biological activity on these cells.
Here, we show that nanomolar concentrations of both GHR and D-GHR induce the differentiation of proliferating skeletal myoblasts in a concentration-dependent manner and promote their fusion into multinucleated syncitia in vitro. The cellular and molecular mechanisms by which GHR and D-GHR elicit these responses are not known. Cell cycle withdrawal is a prerequisite for myogenic terminal differentiation (Walsh and Perlman, 1997
). Indeed, the ability of GHR and D-GHR to reduce DNA synthesis of proliferating C2C12 myoblasts is highly consistent with their prodifferentiative activity. However, inhibition of cell proliferation is not sufficient to elicit muscle differentiation. For example, myostatin inhibits both proliferation and differentiation of C2C12 myoblasts, through down-regulation of MyoD and myogenin expression (Joulia et al., 2003
). Conversely, GHR and D-GHR, beyond inhibiting cell proliferation, induce the expression of myogenin, which is required for the complete program of differentiation of skeletal myoblasts to proceed (Zhang et al., 1999
). To our knowledge this is the first evidence for an extracellular factor able to induce muscle differentiation of proliferating skeletal myoblasts in GM.
In proliferating C2C12 myoblasts, activation of p38 pathway obtained by overexpression of constitutively active MKK6 is sufficient to induce myogenin expression, cell cycle exit, and skeletal muscle terminal differentiation (Wu et al., 2000
). Thus, we investigated whether GHR and D-GHR prodifferentiative activity is mediated by p38. Consistently, inhibition of p38 by cell treatment with SB203580 resulted in the partial albeit significant inhibition of GHR and D-GHR-induced differentiative activity. In addition, we also showed that both GHR and D-GHR activate p38. Altogether, these data demonstrate that GHR and D-GHR act as antiproliferative and prodifferentiative factors by stimulating the p38 pathway.
The lack of expression of GHSR-1a in either C2C12 myoblasts and skeletal muscle tissue (Gnanapavan et al., 2002
) as well as the activity exerted by D-GHR suggest that GHR- and D-GHRdifferentiating activities are mediated by a yet unidentified receptor, common to both acylated and unacylated peptide and distinct from GHSR-1a. Indeed, here we showed that C2C12 cells feature high-affinity common binding sites for both GHR and D-GHR. Such binding sites are specific, because they do not recognize either N-terminal truncated ghrelin or motilin, which are unable to induce differentiation. These studies also demonstrate that the N-terminal portion of the GHR peptide is required for binding and induction of C2C12 muscular differentiation. Together, these data provide further evidence for novel GHR receptor subtypes, which do not discriminate between the acylated and unacylated peptide. Although evidence for common GHR and D-GHR receptors have been reported in several cells, including a cardiomyocyte-derived cell line (Baldanzi et al., 2002
), this is the first evidence for their expression in skeletal muscle.
We also verified whether the ghrelin gene is up-regulated in C2C12 myoblasts induced to differentiate in DM. However, no difference of ghrelin expression was detected by real-time RT-PCR between proliferating and differentiating cells (data not shown), suggesting that GHR gene product is not involved in DM-induced skeletal muscle differentiation in vitro.
By showing that GHR and D-GHR stimulate terminal differentiation of skeletal myoblasts in vitro, we may raise the hypothesis that the function of GHR gene may be involved in skeletal muscle differentiation in vivo. However, the lack of a consistent phenotype in GHR knockout mice, suggests that GHR function is not required for myogenesis during development. Consistently, we have not detected any GHR expression in somites or related structures during embryonic development by in situ hybridization (data not shown). However, although not essential for embryo development, GHR might be involved in the complex process of myogenesis in the adulthood, i.e., in regenerative processes of skeletal muscle. This hypothesis is consistent with the data showing that FGF6 is not required for muscle development, but is required in the adult for damage-induced muscle regeneration (Floss et al., 1997
).
Upon muscular injury, skeletal myoblasts are activated to terminally differentiate through an autocrine/paracrine loop. We may speculate that GHR would contribute to skeletal muscle plasticity, promoting the differentiation and fusion of myoblasts in the damaged muscles. If this hypothesis would be proved, the activation of the receptor mediating GHR and D-GHR differentiative activity as well as the overexpression of the hormone may provide novel therapeutic strategies for the reduction or retardation of several skeletal muscle pathologies, including dystrophies, atrophies, and cachexia.
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
Address correspondence to: Nicoletta Filigheddu (nicoletta.filigheddu{at}med.unipmn.it)
Abbreviations used: D-GHR, des-acyl ghrelin; DM, differentiation medium; EGFP, enhanced green fluorescent protein; GHR, ghrelin; GHSR, growth hormone secretagogue receptor; GM, growth medium; MHC, myosin heavy chain.
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Andreis, P. G., Malendowicz, L. K., Trejter, M., Neri, G., Spinazzi, R., Rossi, G. P., Nussdorfer, G. G. (2003). Ghrelin and growth hormone secretagogue receptor are expressed in the rat adrenal cortex: evidence that ghrelin stimulates the growth, but not the secretory activity of adrenal cells. FEBS Lett 536, 173179.[CrossRef][Medline]
Andres, V. and Walsh, K. (1996). Myogenin expression, cell cycle withdrawal, and phenotypic differentiation are temporally separable events that precede cell fusion upon myogenesis. J. Cell Biol 132, 657666.
Baldanzi, G., et al. (2002). Ghrelin and des-acyl ghrelin inhibit cell death in cardiomyocytes and endothelial cells through ERK1/2 and PI 3-kinase/AKT. J. Cell Biol 159, 10291037.
Barreiro, M. L., Gaytan, F., Castellano, J. M., Suominen, J. S., Roa, J., Gaytan, M., Aguilar, E., Dieguez, C., Toppari, J., Tena-Sempere, M. (2004). Ghrelin inhibits the proliferative activity of immature Leydig cells in vivo and regulates stem cell factor messenger ribonucleic acid expression in rat testis. Endocrinology 145, 48254834.
Blau, H. M., Pavlath, G. K., Hardeman, E. C., Chiu, C. P., Silberstein, L., Webster, S. G., Miller, S. C., Webster, C. (1985). Plasticity of the differentiated state. Science 230, 758766.
Cassoni, P., Ghè, C., Marrocco, T., Tarabra, E., Allia, E., Catapano, F., Deghenghi, R., Ghigo, E., Papotti, M., Muccioli, G. (2004). Expression of ghrelin and biological activity of specific receptors for ghrelin and des-acyl ghrelin in human prostate neoplasms and related cell lines. Eur. J. Endocrinol 150, 173184.[Abstract]
Cassoni, P., Papotti, M., Ghe, C., Catapano, F., Sapino, A., Graziani, A., Deghenghi, R., Reissmann, T., Ghigo, E., Muccioli, G. (2001). Identification, characterization, and biological activity of specific receptors for natural (ghrelin) and synthetic growth hormone secretagogues and analogs in human breast carcinomas and cell lines. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab 86, 17381745.
Choi, K., Roh, S. G., Hong, Y. H., Shrestha, Y. B., Hishikawa, D., Chen, C., Kojima, M., Kangawa, K., Sasaki, S. (2003). The role of ghrelin and growth hormone secretagogues receptor on rat adipogenesis. Endocrinology 144, 754759.
De Vriese, C., Gregoire, F., De Neef, P., Robberecht, P., Delporte, C. (2005). Ghrelin is produced by the human erythroleukemic HEL cell line and involved in an autocrine pathway leading to cell proliferation. Endocrinology 146, 15141522.
Delhanty, P. J., van der Eerden, B. C., van der Velde, M., Gauna, C., Pols, H. A., Jahr, H., Chiba, H., van der Lely, A. J., van Leeuwen, J. P. (2006). Ghrelin and unacylated ghrelin stimulate human osteoblast growth via mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK)/phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K) pathways in the absence of GHS-R1a. J. Endocrinol 188, 3747.
Duxbury, M. S., Waseem, T., Ito, H., Robinson, M. K., Zinner, M. J., Ashley, S. W., Whang, E. E. (2003). Ghrelin promotes pancreatic adenocarcinoma cellular proliferation and invasiveness. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun 309, 464468.[CrossRef][Medline]
Filigheddu, N, et al. (2001). Hexarelin protects H9C2 cardiomyocytes from doxorubicin-induced cell death. Endocrine 14, 113119.[CrossRef][Medline]
Floss, T., Arnold, H. H., Braun, T. (1997). A role for FGF-6 in skeletal muscle regeneration. Genes Dev 11, 20402051.
Fukushima, N, et al. (2005). Ghrelin directly regulates bone formation. J. Bone Miner. Res 20, 790798.[CrossRef][Medline]
Ghè, C., Cassoni, P., Catapano, F., Marrocco, T., Deghenghi, R., Ghigo, E., Muccioli, G., Papotti, M. (2002). The antiproliferative effect of synthetic peptidyl GH secretagogues in human CALU-1 lung carcinoma cells. Endocrinology 143, 484491.
Gnanapavan, S., Kola, B., Bustin, S. A., Morris, D. G., McGee, P., Fairclough, P., Bhattacharya, S., Carpenter, R., Grossman, A. B., Korbonits, M. (2002). The tissue distribution of the mRNA of ghrelin and subtypes of its receptor, GHS-R, in humans. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab 87, 29882991.
Granado, M., Priego, T., Martin, A. I., Villanua, M. A., Lopez-Calderon, A. (2005). Ghrelin receptor agonist GHRP-2 prevents arthritis-induced increase in E3 ubiquitin-ligating enzymes MuRF1 and MAFbx gene expression in skeletal muscle. Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab 289, E1007E1014.
Groschl, M., Topf, H. G., Bohlender, J., Zenk, J., Klussmann, S., Dotsch, J., Rascher, W., Rauh, M. (2005). Identification of ghrelin in human saliva: production by the salivary glands and potential role in proliferation of oral keratinocytes. Clin. Chem 51, 110.
Howard, H. D, et al. (1996). A receptor in pituitary and hypothalamus that functions in growth hormone release. Science 273, 974976.[Abstract]
Jeffery, P. L., Herington, A. C., Chopin, L. K. (2002). Expression and action of the growth hormone releasing peptide ghrelin and its receptor in prostate cancer cell lines. J. Endocrinol 172, R7R11.[Abstract]
Joulia, D., Bernardi, H., Garandel, V., Rabenoelina, F., Vernus, B., Cabello, G. (2003). Mechanisms involved in the inhibition of myoblast proliferation and differentiation by myostatin. Exp. Cell Res 286, 263275.[CrossRef][Medline]
Kim, M. S, et al. (2004). The mitogenic and antiapoptotic actions of ghrelin in 3T3L1 adipocytes. Mol. Endocrinol 18, 22912301.
Kim, S. W., Her, S. J., Park, S. J., Kim, D., Park, K. S., Lee, H. K., Han, B. H., Kim, M. S., Shin, C. S., Kim, S. Y. (2005). Ghrelin stimulates proliferation and differentiation and inhibits apoptosis in osteoblastic MC3T3E1 cells. Bone 37, 359369.[Medline]
Kohno, D., Gao, H. Z., Muroya, S., Kikuyama, S., Yada, T. (2003). Ghrelin directly interacts with neuropeptide-Y-containing neurons in the rat arcuate nucleus: Ca(2+) signaling via protein kinase A and N-type channel-dependent mechanisms and cross-talk with leptin and orexin. Diabetes 52, 948956.
Kojima, M., Hosoda, H., Date, Y., Nakazato, M., Matsuo, H., Kangawa, K. (1999). Ghrelin is a growth-hormone-releasing acylated peptide from stomach. Nature 402, 656660.[CrossRef][Medline]
Maccarinelli, G., Sibilia, V., Torsello, A., Raimondo, F., Pitto, M., Giustina, A., Netti, C., Cocchi, D. (2005). Ghrelin regulates proliferation and differentiation of osteoblastic cells. J. Endocrinol 184, 249256.
Mazzocchi, G., Neri, G., Rucinski, M., Rebuffat, P., Spinazzi, R., Malendowicz, L. K., Nussdorfer, G. G. (2004). Ghrelin enhances the growth of cultured human adrenal zona glomerulosa cells by exerting MAPK-mediated proliferogenic and antiapoptotic effects. Peptides 25, 12691277.[CrossRef][Medline]
Muccioli, G., Papotti, M., Locatelli, V., Ghigo, E., Deghenghi, R. (2001). Binding of 125I-labelled ghrelin to membranes from human hypothalamus and pituitary gland. J. Endocrinol. Invest 24, RC7RC9.[Medline]
Muccioli, G., Pons, N., Ghè, C., Catapano, F., Granata, R., Ghigo, E. (2004). Ghrelin and des-acyl ghrelin both inhibit isoproterenol-induced lipolysis in rat adipocytes via a non-type growth hormone secretagogue receptor. Eur. J. Pharmacol 498, 2735.[CrossRef][Medline]
Nagaya, N., Itoh, T., Murakami, S., Oya, H., Uematsu, M., Miyatake, K., Kangawa, K. (2005). Treatment of cachexia with ghrelin in patients with COPD. Chest 128, 11871193.
Nagaya, N., Moriya, J., Yasumura, Y., Uematsu, M., Ono, F., Shimizu, W., Ueno, K., Kitakaze, M., Miyatake, K., Kangawa, K. (2004). Effects of ghrelin administration on left ventricular function, exercise capacity, and muscle wasting in patients with chronic heart failure. Circulation 110, 36743679.
Nagaya, N, et al. (2001). Elevated circulating level of ghrelin in cachexia associated with chronic heart failure: relationships between ghrelin and anabolic/catabolic factors. Circulation 104, 20342038.
Nanzer, A. M., Khalaf, S., Mozid, A. M., Fowkes, R. C., Patel, M. V., Burrin, J. M., Grossman, A. B., Korbonits, M. (2004). Ghrelin exerts a proliferative effect on a rat pituitary somatotroph cell line via the mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway. Eur. J. Endocrinol 151, 233240.[Abstract]
Papotti, M., Ghè, C., Cassoni, P., Catapano, F., Deghenghi, R., Ghigo, E., Muccioli, G. (2000). Growth hormone secretagogue. GHS binding sites in peripheral human tissues. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab 85, 38033807.
Pettersson, I., Muccioli, G., Granata, R., Deghenghi, R., Ghigo, E., Ohlsson, C., Isgaard, J. (2002). Natural (ghrelin) and synthetic (hexarelin) GH secretagogues stimulate H9c2 cardiomyocyte cell proliferation. J. Endocrinol 175, 201209.[Abstract]
Reimer, M. K., Pacini, G., Ahren, B. (2003). Dose-dependent inhibition by ghrelin of insulin secretion in the mouse. Endocrinology 144, 916921.
Shimizu, Y., Nagaya, N., Isobe, T., Imazu, M., Okumura, H., Hosoda, H., Kojima, M., Kangawa, K., Kohno, N. (2003). Increased plasma ghrelin level in lung cancer cachexia. Clin. Cancer Res 9, 774778.
Tesauro, M., Schinzari, F., Iantorno, M., Rizza, S., Melina, D., Lauro, D., Cardillo, C. (2005). Ghrelin improves endothelial function in patients with metabolic syndrome. Circulation 112, 29862992.
Volante, M., Allia, E., Fulcheri, E., Cassoni, P., Ghigo, E., Muccioli, G., Papotti, M. (2003). Ghrelin in fetal thyroid and follicular tumors and cell lines: expression and effects on tumor growth. Am. J. Pathol 162, 645654.
Walsh, K. and Perlman, H. (1997). Cell cycle exit upon myogenic differentiation. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev 7, 597602.[CrossRef][Medline]
Wu, Z., Woodring, P. J., Bhakta, K. S., Tamura, K., Wen, F., Feramisco, J. R., Karin, M., Wang, J. Y., Puri, P. L. (2000). p38 and extracellular signal-regulated kinases regulate the myogenic program at multiple steps. Mol. Cell Biol 20, 39513964.
Xia, Q., Pang, W., Pan, H., Zheng, Y., Kang, J. S., Zhu, S. G. (2004). Effects of ghrelin on the proliferation and secretion of splenic T lymphocytes in mice. Regul. Pept 122, 173178.[CrossRef][Medline]
Zhang, P., Wong, C., Liu, D., Finegold, M., Harper, J. W., Elledge, S. J. (1999). p21(CIP1) and p57(KIP2) control muscle differentiation at the myogenin step. Genes Dev 13, 213224.
Zhang, W., Hu, Y., Lin, T. R., Fan, Y., Mulholland, M. W. (2005). Stimulation of neurogenesis in rat nucleus of the solitary tract by ghrelin. Peptides 26, 22802288.[CrossRef][Medline]
Zhang, W., Zhao, L., Lin, T. R., Chai, B., Fan, Y., Gantz, I., Mulholland, M. W. (2004). Inhibition of adipogenesis by ghrelin. Mol. Biol. Cell 15, 24842491.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
H. Chung, S. Seo, M. Moon, and S. Park Phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase/Akt/glycogen synthase kinase-3{beta} and ERK1/2 pathways mediate protective effects of acylated and unacylated ghrelin against oxygen-glucose deprivation-induced apoptosis in primary rat cortical neuronal cells J. Endocrinol., September 1, 2008; 198(3): 511 - 521. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. Zhang, B. Chai, J.-y. Li, H. Wang, and M. W. Mulholland Effect of Des-acyl Ghrelin on Adiposity and Glucose Metabolism Endocrinology, September 1, 2008; 149(9): 4710 - 4716. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Deng, J. Ling, J. Ma, C. Liu, and W. Zhang Stimulation of intramembranous bone repair in rats by ghrelin Exp Physiol, July 1, 2008; 93(7): 872 - 879. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Granado, A. I. Martin, M. Lopez-Menduina, A. Lopez-Calderon, and M. A. Villanua GH-releasing peptide-2 administration prevents liver inflammatory response in endotoxemia Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab, January 1, 2008; 294(1): E131 - E141. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||