![[Feedback]](/icons/banner/feedbackACT.gif){kind=icon}
![[For Subscribers]](/icons/banner/subscriberACT.gif){kind=icon}
![[Archive]](/icons/banner/archiveACT.gif){kind=icon}
![[Search]](/icons/banner/searchACT.gif){kind=icon}
![[Contents]](/icons/banner/tocACT.gif){kind=icon}
|
|
|
|
|
||
Vol. 18, Issue 6, 2112-2122, June 2007
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Departments of *Anatomy and Molecular Cell Biology and Biochemistry II, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya 466-8550, Japan; and Department of Neurology, Kinki University School of Medicine, Osaka 589-8511, Japan
Submitted January 26, 2007;
Revised March 6, 2007;
Accepted March 20, 2007
Monitoring Editor: Jean Gruenberg
 |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
 TOP ABSTRACT INTRODUCTIONMATERIALS AND METHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONREFERENCES |
|---|
|
INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
TOPABSTRACTINTRODUCTIONMATERIALS AND METHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONREFERENCES |
|---|
). Domains showing a liquid-ordered state have been visualized in model membranes (Korlach et al., 1999; Dietrich et al., 2001a), but whether similar domains exist in the biological membranes of living cells, and what their basic properties would be, including size, life span and dynamics, are still under debate (Simons and Ikonen, 1997; Edidin, 2003; Munro, 2003; Kusumi et al., 2004; Mayor and Rao, 2004; Mukherjee and Maxfield, 2004). Recent results, obtained by single-particle tracking and fluorescent resonance energy transfer experiments, have suggested that rafts in normal unstimulated cells are extremely small and may last for <1 ms (Kenworthy et al., 2004; Kusumi et al., 2004; Sharma et al., 2004). Detergent-resistant membranes have often been regarded as an in vitro correlate of rafts, but detergents themselves have been found to cause domain formation artificially (Heerklotz, 2002). These results have thus posed questions regarding the true existence of rafts in living, nonstimulated cells. In addition, although microscopic identification of rafts has been attempted in a number of studies, putative raft molecules generally show diffuse distribution in the cell membrane without any concentration at the resolution of light microscopy. This result has been interpreted in several different ways, i.e., that rafts do not in fact exist, rafts are too small to be resolved by light microscopy, rafts occupy the majority of the membrane, or rafts do exist but may be disrupted by experimental procedures.
GM1 has been generally regarded as an authentic raft molecule, and cholera toxin B-subunit (CtxB) has been used to probe its distribution in many microscopic studies including FRET (Kenworthy et al., 2000; Nichols, 2003). However, because CtxB is a pentameric molecule that can bind to five GM1 molecules, binding of CtxB itself is likely to change the distribution of GM1 in the membrane as shown for membrane proteins that were cross-linked with antibodies (Mayor et al., 1994; Fujimoto, 1996). Some studies used specimens that were fixed before the CtxB labeling (Parton, 1994), but chemical fixatives are unlikely to preserve the in situ localization of membrane molecules, particularly lipids, and may even cause artifactual results (Jost et al., 1973; Chandler, 1984).
To avoid the possible artifacts caused by probe binding and chemical fixation, and also to take advantage of the high resolving power of electron microscopy (EM), we turned to immuno-EM using SDS-treated freeze-fracture replicas (SDS- FRL) (Figure 1). In combination with rapid freezing, SDS-FRL can immobilize membrane molecules physically and determine their localization in the nanometer range (Fujimoto, 1995). By use of this method, we wanted to examine whether putative raft lipids are distributed in clusters in the living cell membrane as postulated in the raft hypothesis.
|
|
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
TOPABSTRACTINTRODUCTIONMATERIALS AND METHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONREFERENCES |
|---|
). Two different batches of antibodies were used in the present study, and they gave equivalent results. Mouse anti-GM3 antibody (clone GMR6; Seikagaku-Kogyo, Tokyo, Japan) and biotin-conjugated cholera toxin B-subunit (b-CtxB; Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) were purchased. Mouse anti-phosphatidylcholine (PC) antibody (JE-1) (Nam et al., 1990) was kindly donated by Dr. Masato Umeda (Kyoto University). Secondary antibodies conjugated with fluorochromes (Invitrogen), horseradish peroxidase (Pierce Chemical, Rockford, IL), and colloidal gold (BioCell, Cardiff, United Kingdom), and protein A coupled to colloidal gold (University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands) were obtained from respective suppliers.
Cells
Fibroblasts were explanted from the dermis of wild-type mice and mice lacking the 
1,4-N-acetylgalactosamine-transferase gene (Takamiya et al., 1996). They were maintained in DMEM supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum, 50 U/ml penicillin, and 0.05 mg/ml streptomycin at 37°C under 5% CO2, 95% air. The latter cells were referred to as GM1-null fibroblasts. To load GM1-null cells with exogenous GM1 (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO), the cells were incubated in serum-free DMEM containing GM1 (0.3, 3, or 30 µM) for 1 h at 37°C in the CO2 incubator. After incubation, the cells were washed twice with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and incubated with PBS containing 0.2% fatty acid-free bovine serum albumin (BSA) (Wako Pure Chemicals, Osaka, Japan) to remove GM1 loosely bound to the cell surface (Schwarzmann et al., 1983). For cholesterol depletion, cells were treated with 5 mM methyl--cyclodextrin (MCD) in DMEM for 60 min.
Thin-Layer Chromatography (TLC) Immunoblotting and Dot Blotting
Total lipids were extracted from cells by using chloroform/methanol, and glycosphingolipids were obtained by reverse phase chromatography with Sep-Pak C18 cartridge (Waters, Milford, MA) (Williams and McCluer, 1980). TLC was performed with high-performance TLC plates (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) with a solvent system of chloroform/methanol/0.25% CaCl2 (60:35:8). For staining by resorcinol, 0.5 µg of gangliosides was loaded. For TLC immunoblotting, 0.25 µg of gangliosides was developed on TLC plates, transferred to polyvinylidene difluoride membranes, and immunolabeled as described previously (Taki and Ishikawa, 1997). For dot blotting, glycosphingolipids were blotted on the nitrocellulose membrane. The signals of blotting were detected using the SuperSignal West Dura Extended Substrate (Pierce Chemical) according to the manufacturer's instruction.
Immunofluorescence Microscopy
Cells cultured on glass coverslips were fixed with buffered 4% formaldehyde, pretreated with 3% BSA, and incubated with antibodies or b-CtxB, followed by the fluorochrome-conjugated secondary reagents. In some experiments, unfixed cells were incubated with the primary probes on ice, fixed, and then labeled by the secondary reagents. The labeled samples were observed by an Axiophot2 microscope (Carl Zeiss, Jena, Germany) equipped with an AxioCam charge-coupled device camera using an Apochromat oil immersion 63x objective lens with a numerical aperture of 1.4. For quantification of filipin labeling intensity, focus was adjusted by rhodamine-phalloidin in the same specimen, and filipin fluorescence was pictured without observation by an identical microscope setting, and analyzed by ImageJ (National Institute of Health, Bethesda, MD).
Quick-Freezing and Freeze-Fracture
Cells grown on a small gold foil (
4 mm2 in area; 20 µm in thickness) were inverted upon prewarmed 10% gelatin on a gold-plated copper specimen table with the cell side down according to the metal sandwich method (Fujimoto and Fujimoto, 1997). The cell sandwich was slammed onto the copper block precooled to the liquid helium temperature (–269°C) by using the rapid freezing apparatus HIF-4K (Hitachi High-Technologies, Tokyo, Japan).
For freeze-fracturing, the specimens were transferred to a cold stage of a Balzers BAF400 apparatus, and they were fractured at –95°C and 2 x 10–6 mbar. Replicas of the fractured membrane were made by electron-beam evaporation of platinum/carbon (Pt/C) and carbon (C), and the replica thickness was controlled by a crystal thickness monitor. Three different evaporation protocols were tested: 1) Pt/C (2 nm) followed by C (20 nm), 2) C (20 nm) followed by Pt/C (2 nm), 3) C (2 nm) followed by Pt/C (2 nm), and then by C (20 nm). After thawing, the replicas were immediately treated for 5 min in 2.5% SDS in PBS at 70°C. They were adjusted to 50% glycerol and kept at –20°C until labeling. Immunogold labeling was done as described previously (Fujimoto et al., 1996), and the specimens were observed with a JEOL 1200EX electron microscope operated at 100 kV.
Statistical Analysis of Immunogold Labeling
Electron micrographs were digitized with an image scanner. The x-y coordinates of gold particles were obtained by Image Processing Tool Kit version 5 plug-in (Reindeer Graphics, Asheville, NC) for Adobe Photoshop version 6 (Adobe system, Mountain View, CA), and areas of 1 µm x 1 µm chosen randomly were analyzed by Ripley's K-function (Ripley, 1979) by using a program provided by John Hancock (Prior et al., 2003). For significance tests, 99% confidence envelopes for complete spatial randomness (CSR) were generated from 100 Monte Carlo simulations. The frequency distribution of the nearest neighbor distance distribution was obtained by using the Image Processing Tool Kit.
Measurement of Phospholipids Bound to Replicas
The amount of phospholipids retained in SDS-treated C-Pt/C replicas was measured as described previously. Briefly, a suspension of small unilamellar PC liposomes was sandwiched between two thin copper foils, quickly frozen, freeze-fractured, and shadowed. One of the complementary replicas was washed in distilled water, and the other replica was treated with 2.5% SDS and washed with distilled water. The replicas were treated with 70% perchloric acid at 200°C for 2 h, and the released phosphorus was measured (Zhou and Arthur, 1992).
Biochemical Assay of Cholesterol
The total lipids were extracted from cells by a mixture of hexane and isopropanol (3:2), and the amount of free cholesterol was measured by enzymatic fluorometric method as described previously (Heider and Boyett, 1978).
On-Grid Model Experiment
Colloidal gold (2 nm; BioCell) conjugated with recombinant glutathione S-transferase (GST) was applied to Formvar-coated EM grids, blocked, and labeled with rabbit anti-GST followed by GAR-Fab5 or by PAG5. In other experiments, a dilute solution of recombinant GST was put on Formvar-coated grids and labeled by the same protocol.
|
RESULTS |
|---|
|
TOPABSTRACTINTRODUCTIONMATERIALS AND METHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONREFERENCES |
|---|
Immunogold Labeling of Freeze-Fracture Replicas
We previously showed that phospholipids are retained on SDS-treated freeze-fracture replicas and that they can be labeled by antibodies, but the labeling density was relatively low (Fujimoto et al., 1996). To explore different conditions that may facilitate the efficient labeling of GM1, we compared replicas prepared in three different ways. In replicas produced by the conventional evaporation method, e.g., Pt/C (2 nm) followed by C (20 nm), labeling was found to be extremely low either by anti-GM1 antibody or by b-CtxB. The labeling intensity was improved, however, when the replicas were prepared by evaporating C before Pt/C. C (20 nm)-Pt/C (2 nm) replicas and C (2 nm)-Pt/C (2 nm)-C (20 nm) replicas gave equivalent results (Supplemental Figure 2). The retention of phospholipids in the SDS-treated replicas was not compromised by the change of the evaporation method: 82.6 ± 13.0% (n = 3) phosphatidylcholine was retained in the C (20 nm)-Pt/C (2 nm) replicas, which was even better than the retention ratio obtained for the conventional Pt/C (2 nm)-C (20 nm) replicas (Fujimoto et al., 1996). Although the structural details became somewhat less defined in the C (20 nm)-Pt/C (2 nm) replica, we adopted this method in the present study due to its simplicity. Regardless of the procedure that was used for replica preparation, the labeling of GM1 was observed only in the E face, which represents the outer leaflet, and not in the P face, which represents the inner leaflet, or in the cytoplasm (Figure 3A, inset). Because the rabbit anti-GM1 antibodies gave significantly better labeling than b-CtxB, we used these antibodies in all of the subsequent EM experiments. The labeling efficiency of GM1 by the current method was calculated as described in Supplemental Table 1, and it was estimated that no less than 19.4% of GM1 in the original membrane was captured by immunogold labeling on the replicas.
The specificity of labeling in the replicas was confirmed using GM1-null cells (Takamiya et al., 1996). Replicas of those cells were devoid of labeling either by the anti-GM1 antibodies or by b-CtxB (Figure 2C). Significantly, however, positive labeling by both probes was observed when exogenous GM1 was added to the culture medium before freezing. The quantitative loading of GM1 was confirmed by dot blotting and immunofluorescence microscopy (Figure 2, A and B), and the density of replica labeling increased as the GM1 concentration in the medium was raised from 0.3 to 30 µM (Figure 2C). The distribution of the labeling in the GM1-loaded cells was indistinguishable from that in normal mouse fibroblasts. Detailed analysis of the labeling is described below. Because the current methodology precludes the observation of molecules outside the lipid bilayer, the aforementioned results also demonstrate that exogenous GM1 molecules are incorporated into the cell membrane and that they adopt a similar disposition to endogenous GM1.
|
, 1979; Prior et al., 2003). When all the samples were compiled, the L(r) – r curve was found to deviate most from the 99% confidence interval (CI) at a radius of 47.0 nm (Figure 3B). When individual samples were analyzed, the L(r) – r curve showed a prominent peak except in a few cases (Supplemental Figure 3), and the peak size ranged from 32 to 68 nm (Figure 3C). We assumed that the basic cluster is in this size range (the size includes the arm length of the antibodies, which will be discussed later), and in subsequent experiments we classified the GM1 distribution patterns as "clustered" when the K-function was above the 99% CI at more than one point below a 100-nm radius. By this criterion, the GM1 labeling was clustered in all of the randomly chosen areas (50/50). The density of immunogold particles per unit area was found to be quite variable (Figure 4F), but GM1 clustering was observed irrespective of the labeling density.
|
|
We next analyzed the entire area of randomly chosen cells to examine possible local heterogeneity within a single cell. Replicas were often disrupted within the cellular boundary, but areas of 145 µm2 (ranging from 55 to 327 µm2) could be observed on average for each cell. From this analysis, 70% of the cells showed only a clustered distribution throughout their surface, but the remainder showed small areas of random distribution (Figure 4D). An example of a whole cell profile and local L(r) – r curves is shown in Supplemental Figure 6.
Effects of Cholesterol Depletion and Low Temperatures on GM1 Clustering
We next examined distribution of GM1 in mouse fibroblasts after depleting cholesterol to disrupt rafts. In cells treated with 5 mM MCD for 60 min, the free cholesterol content was reduced considerably (Supplemental Figure 7). In these cells, 28% (14/50) of the areas showed random GM1 distribution, but 72% (36/50) still showed clustering (Figure 4C). Essentially, the same result was obtained when PAG5 was used for labeling (Supplemental Figure 5, B and C). Analysis of the compiled data also showed clustering (Figure 4A), but when individual samples were assessed, the peak of the L(r) – r curves was clearly lower, broader, and less distinct compared with the control sample (Supplemental Figure 3). In cholesterol-depleted wild-type mouse fibroblasts, the clustered and random distribution patterns of GM1 coexisted in >90% of the cells (Figure 4D). As shown in representative cases (Figure 5 and Supplemental Figure 6), the two different patterns were often observed side by side in narrow areas of the membrane. The result confirmed that the clustering of GM1 was not caused artifactually by the experimental procedures after freezing.
|
Cholesterol depletion and low temperatures caused similar changes in two other indices: both the nearest neighbor distance (NND) and the average labeling density values increased significantly (Figure 4, E and F). The average NND, normalized to the value expected for random distribution, was significantly <1 in the control cells, but it became close to 1 after either cholesterol depletion or chilling (Figure 4G). Most significantly, the NND was virtually independent of the labeling density in control cells, whereas the NND decreased as the labeling density increased in cells after cholesterol depletion or chilling (Figure 4H). These data strongly indicate that GM1 in control mouse fibroblasts is clustered and that it becomes less so after cholesterol depletion or chilling.
The changes caused by cholesterol depletion and the cold were observed similarly in GM1-null cells preloaded with 10–15 µM GM1. The peak of the L(r) – r curves became lower (Figure 6A), the frequency of random areas increased (Figure 6B), and the average labeling density increased (Figure 6C). Cholesterol depletion caused a more drastic change in the GM1-loaded cells than in the normal mouse fibroblasts. The reason is not clear, but some difference in the fatty acid composition between exogenous GM1 derived from bovine brain and GM1 expressed endogenously in mouse fibroblasts may be involved.
|
), the antibody can only bind to a certain population of PC molecules, and the labeling does not occur homogenously even on liposome replicas (see figure 2A of Fujimoto et al., 1996). A similar patchy labeling pattern was observed in the mouse fibroblast (Figure 7A). In contrast to GM1 (Figure 3) and GM3 (see below), the distribution of the PC labeling was not affected by cholesterol depletion, whereas chilling caused reduction of clustering (Figure 7B). Because of the unidentified binding characteristics of the anti-PC antibody, definite interpretation of the result is not possible, but the result showed that the distributional changes do not occur in the same manner in membrane lipids.
|
CD, the clustering of GM3 decreased significantly (Figure 8B). According to the criterion used for GM1, 26.7% (8/30) of the area showed random distribution, and in the rest of the cases, the L(r) – r curve was out of the CI range (Figure 8C). But as in the case of GM1, analysis of the individual areas showed that the L(r) – r curves became generally lower in cholesterol-depleted cells even when they were classified as "clustered" by the criterion used for GM1 (Supplemental Figure 8). These results indicated that the clustering of GM3 is also related to the cholesterol content of the plasma membrane.
|
|
|
DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
TOPABSTRACTINTRODUCTIONMATERIALS AND METHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONREFERENCES |
|---|
). In their pioneering article, Heuser and his colleagues showed that the surface of a muscle piece became frozen within 1 ms after the impact with the liquid helium-cooled copper block (Heuser et al., 1979). They later found that the freezing rate is at least 10 times faster than that (Heuser, personal communication). Although details in the present experiment were different from their experiment, the cell membrane of thin culture cells should be frozen at a better cooling rate than the muscle piece. Further sophistication in the measurement of the freezing rate is required to assess the time and spatial resolution of this method precisely.
During the freeze-fracture procedure, the specimens were kept frozen below –100°C, and the fractured membrane half was coated by evaporation of C and Pt/C to immobilize membrane molecules in situ. The physical fixation provided by the combination of quick-freezing and freeze-fracturing contrasts with chemical fixation by aldehydes in many respects. Aldehydes have only limited reactivity with membrane lipids and could even cause redistribution of membrane proteins by a cross-linking effect (Kusumi and Suzuki, 2005). More than several seconds are required for the aldehyde fixation to complete, and even after fixation, membrane molecules retain their two-dimensional mobility (Jost et al., 1973; Chandler, 1984). Thus, in specimens fixed by formaldehydes, binding of probes, especially multivalent probes, could cause redistribution of membrane molecules (Mayor et al., 1994). Although glutaraldehyde was shown to prevent gross redistribution of membrane proteins (Mayor et al., 1994), it is unlikely to stabilize membrane lipids in the nanometer range. The membranes stabilized in replicas preclude the possibility of such artifacts caused by probes.
Compared with the conventional method that evaporates Pt/C before C, the labeling of gangliosides was improved drastically by evaporating C before Pt/C. A similar effect has been reported for some membrane proteins (Hagiwara et al., 2005). The reason for this improvement is not fully clear, but compared with Pt/C, pure C casting may allow the molecules to retain some flexibility, which may facilitate their interaction with probes. Additionally, the use of antibodies improved the GM1 labeling in SDS-FRL. CtxB worked well for immunofluorescence microscopy, but it labeled the replica to a much lesser extent than the anti-GM1 antibodies. For high-affinity binding of pentameric CtxB molecules, GM1 molecules and surrounding lipids may need to be rearranged properly, and this probably occurs frequently in the fluid membrane. The relatively low labeling by SDS-FRL may have resulted because molecules in the replica are immobilized, and they do not take an appropriate arrangement very often.
GM1 Clustering in the Cell Membrane
The GM1 labeling formed clusters with an average radius of 47.0 nm in control mouse fibroblasts. The average labeling density ranged from <100 to >1400 particles/µm2, but clusters of similar sizes were observed irrespective of the GM1 density. In our present method, two layers of probes, either a whole IgG molecule and a F(ab')2 portion (GAR-Fab5) or a whole IgG and protein A (PAG5), were intercalated between colloidal gold (5 nm) and the antigen. Using a model experiment, the spacer distances were estimated as 16.3 ± 4.1 nm (GAR-Fab5) and 16.1 ± 5.3 nm (PAG5) (Supplemental Figure 10). This lead to a calculated size of the GM1 cluster of 61 nm in diameter, which roughly corresponds to that which was estimated by several studies for glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI)-anchored protein clusters (Friedrichson and Kurzchalia, 1998; Varma and Mayor, 1998; Pralle et al., 2000), but it is larger than the estimate obtained in more recent studies by using sophisticated biophysical techniques (Kusumi et al., 2004; Sharma et al., 2004). Ras proteins were also shown to make smaller clusters by immuno-EM of mechanically detached membranes (Plowman et al., 2005). The size difference of the clusters is not surprising, however, because GPI-anchored proteins were shown to behave differently from GM1 in several instances (Schnitzer et al., 1995; Simons et al., 1999; Dietrich et al., 2001b). It is also likely that the Ras cluster in the inner leaflet does not coincide with that of GM1 in the outer leaflet. SDS-FRL should be able to study the distribution of those proteins and to compare the cluster sizes directly.
After cholesterol depletion or incubation of cells on ice, GM1 labeling became less clustered, and areas showing random distribution increased significantly. In addition, cholesterol depletion and chilling increased the average labeling density as well as the NND. The increase of the labeling density could reflect a real increase of GM1 molecules in the plasma membrane, but the change of the aforementioned three parameters together, and above all, the virtual independence of NND values from the labeling density in control cells (Figure 4H), is more likely to suggest a dispersion of GM1 clusters by cholesterol depletion or by chilling. That is, GM1 molecules densely packed in control cells are probably not labeled efficiently due to steric hindrance, but after cholesterol depletion or chilling, they may be dispersed and more GM1 molecules may become accessible to antibodies. This possibility also suggests that the density of GM1 molecules in the cluster is underestimated in immunogold labeling.
An important question that arises from our current data is the very nature of these GM1 clusters. The clusters may be explained by the presence of rafts, or liquid-ordered (lo) domains, and by preferential partitioning of GM1 in the domains. The results of our chilling experiments would not seem consistent with this supposition, because low temperatures are expected to increase more ordered domains, whereas cholesterol depletion should disrupt lo domains (Simons and Ikonen, 1997; Gaus et al., 2003). However, as the temperature is decreased, the lo domain should become the dominant or percolating phase, and GM1 and other raft-philic molecules that are confined to small nonpercolating lo domains at the ambient temperature may adopt a dispersed distribution in the expanded lo domains (Meder et al., 2006). Hence, the dispersed GM1 distribution after chilling can be interpreted to reflect the larger lo domain, or an increase of raft areas. This contrasts with the similarly dispersed GM1 distribution after cholesterol depletion, which may be caused by an increase of the liquid-disordered domains, or disruption of rafts.
However, the incomplete dissolution of the GM1 cluster and the marked regional heterogeneity upon cholesterol depletion suggest that preferential partitioning in the ordered membrane may not explain the whole phenomenon. In this context, it is notable that several studies showed formation of GM1-rich microdomains within the ordered phase of model membranes (Vie et al., 1998; Yuan and Johnston, 2000; Yuan et al., 2002), suggesting that glycolipids are capable of self-organization (but please note that other studies failed to observe the clustering of charged gangliosides; Thompson et al., 1985; Wang and Silvius, 2003). Furthermore, the extracellular matrix, the cytoskeleton, and membrane proteins may influence distribution of membrane molecules in various ways (Edidin, 2003; Ritchie et al., 2003; Mukherjee and Maxfield, 2004). These results raised a possibility that those nonraft factors are sufficient to generate the GM1 cluster in mouse fibroblasts and that rafts are not involved. Under this conjecture, the result of cholesterol depletion might be attributed to its effect on the actin cytoskeleton (Kwik et al., 2003). However, we observed that manipulation of actin filaments did not affect the GM1 distribution to the extent that can explain the result of cholesterol depletion (Fujita, Cheng, and Fujimoto, unpublished observation). Moreover, chilling is not likely to affect the actin cytoskeleton in the same manner. We thus inferred that preferential partitioning in the ordered membrane is involved at least partially for the generation of GM1 clusters.
Irrespective of the mechanism that facilitates GM1 clustering in living cells, the present result has several implications. First, it has not been easy to understand why cholesterol depletion and chilling could both activate mitogen-activated protein kinase signaling (Furuchi and Anderson, 1998; Kabouridis et al., 2000; Chen and Resh, 2002; Gousset et al., 2002; Magee et al., 2005), because the two manipulations are thought to exert opposite effects on rafts, but the present result on GM1 suggests that the two manipulations may affect the distribution of individual raft-philic molecules in the same manner and could cause a similar outcome. This tenet may be tested directly by probing fine distribution of signaling proteins that reside in the inner leaflet of the cell membrane. Second, cooling on ice has been often used to label cells for microscopy with the tacit supposition that the molecular distribution at an ambient temperature is retained. However, the present results indicated that cooling could change the distribution of some membrane molecules, so data that have been obtained from chilled cells need to be interpreted with caution.
Heterogeneous Clusters of GM1 and GM3
We observed that both GM1 and GM3 formed clusters susceptible to cholesterol depletion in normal mouse fibroblasts but that the respective clusters were segregated from each other in most cases. In migrating T cells, a distinct segregation of GM1 and GM3, i.e., GM1 in the uropod and GM3 in the leading edge, was observed (Gomez-Mouton et al., 2001). Our result suggests that GM1 and GM3 also distribute differentially in other cell types, although on a much more minuscule scale. The result also implies that the high distribution density of the two gangliosides has precluded the observation of their segregation by light microscopy in the past.
Biochemical fractions enriched with GM1 and GM3 have been shown to contain different sets of signaling molecules (Iwabuchi et al., 1998; Chigorno et al., 2000). Those fractions are likely to correspond to the GM1 and GM3 domains that we observed, and this would raise two immediate questions. One question is whether the spatial relationship of the two domains would modulate signaling by altering molecular interactions among the signaling proteins. We observed occasional coclustering of GM1 and GM3, which suggests that the two domains could coalesce under certain conditions. It would be interesting to study how coalescence and segregation of those domains are regulated and what is brought about as a result of the domain interactions. The second question is how signaling proteins in the inner leaflet partition to one of the ganglioside domains preferentially. This may be related to the mechanism that generates separate clusters of GM1 and GM3. An intriguing possibility is that GM1 and GM3 are diversified in the ceramide portion and thus favor homologous interactions (Sonnino and Chigorno, 2000; Hakomori Si, 2002). This is not an unrealistic speculation, because glycosyltransferases for the late ganglioside biosynthetic pathways are in the distal Golgi membranes (Lannert et al., 1998), which harbor cholesterol-dependent microdomains, and the probability that a GM3 molecule is processed to become GM1 may depend on the affinity of its ceramide portion to the microdomain where the enzymes exist. As a result, gangliosides remaining as GM3, and those that became GM1, are likely to make homologous clusters more often than heterogeneous gangliosides. Analysis of the ceramide composition of gangliosides is awaited to test the possibility.
Although the underlying mechanism needs to be explored further, our result showed that GM1 and GM3 exist as distinct clusters in the native cell membrane. But the GM1 and GM3 clusters may not be the only microdomains that are affected by cholesterol depletion, and additional microdomains with variable contents are likely to coexist (Marwali et al., 2003; Nagatsuka et al., 2003; Brugger et al., 2004; Kiyokawa et al., 2005). How all those heterogeneous microdomains are formed and how their mutual relationship is controlled warrant further investigation. Hopefully, the present method would help to address these unsolved questions in the near future.
|
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
|
Footnotes |
|---|
The online version of this article contains supplemental material at MBC Online (http://www.molbiolcell.org). 
Address correspondence to: Toyoshi Fujimoto (tfujimot{at}med.nagoya-u.ac.jp).
Abbreviations used: b-CtxB, biotinylated cholera toxin B; CI, confidence interval; CSR, complete spatial randomness; EM, electron microscopy; GAR-Fab5, colloidal gold (5-nm)-conjugated anti-rabbit IgG F(ab')2 fragment; PAG5, colloidal gold (5-nm)-conjugated protein A; MCD, methyl--cyclodextrin; NND, nearest neighbor distance; PC, phosphatidylcholine; SDS-FRL, SDS-treated freeze-fracture replicas.
|
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
TOPABSTRACTINTRODUCTIONMATERIALS AND METHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONREFERENCES |
|---|
Chandler, D. E. (1984). Comparison of quick-frozen and chemically fixed sea-urchin eggs: structural evidence that cortical granule exocytosis is preceded by a local increase in membrane mobility. J. Cell Sci 72, 23–36.[Abstract]
Chen, X. and Resh, M. D. (2002). Cholesterol depletion from the plasma membrane triggers ligand-independent activation of the epidermal growth factor receptor. J. Biol. Chem 277, 49631–49637.
Chigorno, V., Palestini, P., Sciannamblo, M., Dolo, V., Pavan, A., Tettamanti, G., Sonnino, S. (2000). Evidence that ganglioside enriched domains are distinct from caveolae in MDCK II and human fibroblast cells in culture. Eur. J. Biochem 267, 4187–4197.[Medline]
Dietrich, C., Bagatolli, L. A., Volovyk, Z. N., Thompson, N. L., Levi, M., Jacobson, K., Gratton, E. (2001a). Lipid rafts reconstituted in model membranes. Biophys. J 80, 1417–1428.[Medline]
Dietrich, C., Volovyk, Z. N., Levi, M., Thompson, N. L., Jacobson, K. (2001b). Partitioning of Thy-1, GM1, and cross-linked phospholipid analogs into lipid rafts reconstituted in supported model membrane monolayers. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98, 10642–10647.
Edidin, M. (2003). The state of lipid rafts: from model membranes to cells. Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biomol. Struct 32, 257–283.[CrossRef][Medline]
Friedrichson, T. and Kurzchalia, T. V. (1998). Microdomains of GPI-anchored proteins in living cells revealed by crosslinking. Nature 394, 802–805.[CrossRef][Medline]
Fujimoto, K. (1995). Freeze-fracture replica electron microscopy combined with SDS digestion for cytochemical labeling of integral membrane proteins. Application to the immunogold labeling of intercellular junctional complexes. J. Cell Sci 108, 3443–3449.[Abstract]
Fujimoto, K., Umeda, M., Fujimoto, T. (1996). Transmembrane phospholipid distribution revealed by freeze-fracture replica labeling. J. Cell Sci 109, 2453–2460.[Abstract]
Fujimoto, T. (1996). GPI-anchored proteins, glycosphingolipids, and sphingomyelin are sequestered to caveolae only after crosslinking. J. Histochem. Cytochem 44, 929–941.[Abstract]
Fujimoto, T. and Fujimoto, K. (1997). Metal sandwich method to quick-freeze monolayer cultured cells for freeze-fracture. J. Histochem. Cytochem 45, 595–598.
Furuchi, T. and Anderson, R. G. (1998). Cholesterol depletion of caveolae causes hyperactivation of extracellular signal-related kinase (ERK). J. Biol. Chem 273, 21099–21104.
Gaus, K., Gratton, E., Kable, E. P., Jones, A. S., Gelissen, I., Kritharides, L., Jessup, W. (2003). Visualizing lipid structure and raft domains in living cells with two-photon microscopy. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 100, 15554–15559.
Gomez-Mouton, C., Abad, J. L., Mira, E., Lacalle, R. A., Gallardo, E., Jimenez-Baranda, S., Illa, I., Bernad, A., Manes, S., Martinez, A. C. (2001). Segregation of leading-edge and uropod components into specific lipid rafts during T cell polarization. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98, 9642–9647.
Gousset, K., Wolkers, W. F., Tsvetkova, N. M., Oliver, A. E., Field, C. L., Walker, N. J., Crowe, J. H., Tablin, F. (2002). Evidence for a physiological role for membrane rafts in human platelets. J. Cell. Physiol 190, 117–128.[CrossRef][Medline]
Hagiwara, A., Fukazawa, Y., Deguchi-Tawarada, M., Ohtsuka, T., Shigemoto, R. (2005). Differential distribution of release-related proteins in the hippocampal CA3 area as revealed by freeze-fracture replica labeling. J. Comp. Neurol 489, 195–216.[CrossRef][Medline]
Hakomori Si, S. I. (2002). Inaugural article: the glycosynapse. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99, 225–232.
Heerklotz, H. (2002). Triton promotes domain formation in lipid raft mixtures. Biophys. J 83, 2693–2701.[Medline]
Heider, J. G. and Boyett, R. L. (1978). The picomole determination of free and total cholesterol in cells in culture. J. Lipid Res 19, 514–518.[Abstract]
Heuser, J. E., Reese, T. S., Dennis, M. J., Jan, Y., Jan, L., Evans, L. (1979). Synaptic vesicle exocytosis captured by quick freezing and correlated with quantal transmitter release. J. Cell Biol 81, 275–300.
Iwabuchi, K., Handa, K., Hakomori, S. (1998). Separation of "glycosphingolipid signaling domain" from caveolin-containing membrane fraction in mouse melanoma B16 cells and its role in cell adhesion coupled with signaling. J. Biol. Chem 273, 33766–33773.
Jost, P., Brooks, U. J., Griffith, O. H. (1973). Fluidity of phospholipid bilayers and membranes after exposure to osmium tetroxide and gluteraldehyde. J. Mol. Biol 76, 313–318.[CrossRef][Medline]
Kabouridis, P. S., Janzen, J., Magee, A. L., Ley, S. C. (2000). Cholesterol depletion disrupts lipid rafts and modulates the activity of multiple signaling pathways in T lymphocytes. Eur. J. Immunol 30, 954–963.[CrossRef][Medline]
Kenworthy, A. K., Nichols, B. J., Remmert, C. L., Hendrix, G. M., Kumar, M., Zimmerberg, J., Lippincott-Schwartz, J. (2004). Dynamics of putative raft-associated proteins at the cell surface. J. Cell Biol 165, 735–746.
Kenworthy, A. K., Petranova, N., Edidin, M. (2000). High-resolution FRET microscopy of cholera toxin B-subunit and GPI-anchored proteins in cell plasma membranes. Mol. Biol. Cell 11, 1645–1655.
Kiyokawa, E., Baba, T., Otsuka, N., Makino, A., Ohno, S., Kobayashi, T. (2005). Spatial and functional heterogeneity of sphingolipid-rich membrane domains. J. Biol. Chem 280, 24072–24084.
Korlach, J., Schwille, P., Webb, W. W., Feigenson, G. W. (1999). Characterization of lipid bilayer phases by confocal microscopy and fluorescence correlation spectroscopy. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96, 8461–8466.
Kusumi, A., Koyama-Honda, I., Suzuki, K. (2004). Molecular dynamics and interactions for creation of stimulation-induced stabilized rafts from small unstable steady-state rafts. Traffic 5, 213–230.[CrossRef][Medline]
Kusumi, A. and Suzuki, K. (2005). Toward understanding the dynamics of membrane-raft-based molecular interactions. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1746, 234–251.[Medline]
Kusunoki, S., Shimizu, J., Chiba, A., Ugawa, Y., Hitoshi, S., Kanazawa, I. (1996). Experimental sensory neuropathy induced by sensitization with ganglioside GD1b. Ann. Neurol 39, 424–431.[CrossRef][Medline]
Kwik, J., Boyle, S., Fooksman, D., Margolis, L., Sheetz, M. P., Edidin, M. (2003). Membrane cholesterol, lateral mobility, and the phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate-dependent organization of cell actin. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 100, 13964–13969.
Lannert, H., Gorgas, K., Meissner, I., Wieland, F. T., Jeckel, D. (1998). Functional organization of the Golgi apparatus in glycosphingolipid biosynthesis. Lactosylceramide and subsequent glycosphingolipids are formed in the lumen of the late Golgi. J. Biol. Chem 273, 2939–2946.
Magee, A. I., Adler, J., Parmryd, I. (2005). Cold-induced coalescence of T-cell plasma membrane microdomains activates signalling pathways. J. Cell Sci 118, 3141–3151.
Marwali, M. R., Rey-Ladino, J., Dreolini, L., Shaw, D., Takei, F. (2003). Membrane cholesterol regulates LFA-1 function and lipid raft heterogeneity. Blood 102, 215–222.
Mayor, S. and Rao, M. (2004). Rafts: scale-dependent, active lipid organization at the cell surface. Traffic 5, 231–240.[CrossRef][Medline]
Mayor, S., Rothberg, K. G., Maxfield, F. R. (1994). Sequestration of GPI-anchored proteins in caveolae triggered by cross-linking. Science 264, 1948–1951.
Meder, D., Moreno, M. J., Verkade, P., Vaz, W. L., Simons, K. (2006). Phase coexistence and connectivity in the apical membrane of polarized epithelial cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 103, 329–334.
Mukherjee, S. and Maxfield, F. R. (2004). Membrane domains. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol 20, 839–866.[CrossRef][Medline]
Munro, S. (2003). Lipid rafts: elusive or illusive? Cell 115, 377–388.[CrossRef][Medline]
Nagatsuka, Y., et al. (2003). Carbohydrate-dependent signaling from the phosphatidylglucoside-based microdomain induces granulocytic differentiation of HL60 cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 100, 7454–7459.
Nam, K. S., Igarashi, K., Umeda, M., Inoue, K. (1990). Production and characterization of monoclonal antibodies that specifically bind to phosphatidylcholine. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1046, 89–96.[Medline]
Nichols, B. J. (2003). GM1-containing lipid rafts are depleted within clathrin-coated pits. Curr. Biol 13, 686–690.[CrossRef][Medline]
Parton, R. G. (1994). Ultrastructural localization of gangliosides; GM1 is concentrated in caveolae. J. Histochem. Cytochem 42, 155–166.[Abstract]
Plowman, S. J., Muncke, C., Parton, R. G., Hancock, J. F. (2005). H-ras, K-ras, and inner plasma membrane raft proteins operate in nanoclusters with differential dependence on the actin cytoskeleton. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102, 15500–15505.
Pralle, A., Keller, P., Florin, E. L., Simons, K., Horber, J. K. (2000). Sphingolipid-cholesterol rafts diffuse as small entities in the plasma membrane of mammalian cells. J. Cell Biol 148, 997–1008.
Prior, I. A., Muncke, C., Parton, R. G., Hancock, J. F. (2003). Direct visualization of Ras proteins in spatially distinct cell surface microdomains. J. Cell Biol 160, 165–170.
Ripley, B. D. (1977). Modeling spatial patterns. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B 39, 172–212.
Ripley, B. D. (1979). Tests of randomness for spatial point patterns. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B 41, 368–374.
Ritchie, K., Iino, R., Fujiwara, T., Murase, K., Kusumi, A. (2003). The fence and picket structure of the plasma membrane of live cells as revealed by single molecule techniques. Mol. Membr. Biol 20, 13–18.[Medline]
Schnitzer, J. E., McIntosh, D. P., Dvorak, A. M., Liu, J., Oh, P. (1995). Separation of caveolae from associated microdomains of GPI-anchored proteins. Science 269, 1435–1439.
Schwarzmann, G., Hoffmann-Bleihauer, P., Schubert, J., Sandhoff, K., Marsh, D. (1983). Incorporation of ganglioside analogues into fibroblast cell membranes. A spin-label study. Biochemistry 22, 5041–5048.[CrossRef][Medline]
Sharma, P., Varma, R., Sarasij, R. C. Ira, Gousset, K., Krishnamoorthy, G., Rao, M., Mayor, S. (2004). Nanoscale organization of multiple GPI-anchored proteins in living cell membranes. Cell 116, 577–589.[CrossRef][Medline]
Simons, K. and Ikonen, E. (1997). Functional rafts in cell membranes. Nature 387, 569–572.[CrossRef][Medline]
Simons, M., Friedrichson, T., Schulz, J. B., Pitto, M., Masserini, M., Kurzchalia, T. V. (1999). Exogenous administration of gangliosides displaces GPI-anchored proteins from lipid microdomains in living cells. Mol. Biol. Cell 10, 3187–3196.
Sonnino, S. and Chigorno, V. (2000). Ganglioside molecular species containing C18- and C20-sphingosine in mammalian nervous tissues and neuronal cell cultures. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1469, 63–77.[Medline]
Takamiya, K., et al. (1996). Mice with disrupted GM2/GD2 synthase gene lack complex gangliosides but exhibit only subtle defects in their nervous system. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 93, 10662–10667.
Taki, T. and Ishikawa, D. (1997). TLC blotting: application to microscale analysis of lipids and as a new approach to lipid-protein interaction. Anal. Biochem 251, 135–143.[CrossRef][Medline]
Thompson, T. E., Allietta, M., Brown, R. E., Johnson, M. L., Tillack, T. W. (1985). Organization of ganglioside GM1 in phosphatidylcholine bilayers. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 817, 229–237.[Medline]
Varma, R. and Mayor, S. (1998). GPI-anchored proteins are organized in submicron domains at the cell surface. Nature 394, 798–801.[CrossRef][Medline]
Vie, V., Van Mau, N., Lesniewska, E., Goudonnet, J. P., Heitz, F., Le Grimelle, C. (1998). Distribution of ganglioside GM1 between two-component, two-phase phosphatidylcholine monolayers. Langmuir 14, 4754–4783.
Wang, T. Y. and Silvius, J. R. (2003). Sphingolipid partitioning into ordered domains in cholesterol-free and cholesterol-containing lipid bilayers. Biophys. J 84, 367–378.[Medline]
Williams, M. A. and McCluer, R. H. (1980). The use of Sep-Pak C18 cartridges during the isolation of gangliosides. J. Neurochem 35, 266–269.[Medline]
Yuan, C., Furlong, J., Burgos, P., Johnston, L. J. (2002). The size of lipid rafts: an atomic force microscopy study of ganglioside GM1 domains in sphingomyelin/DOPC/cholesterol membranes. Biophys. J 82, 2526–2535.[Medline]
Yuan, C. and Johnston, L. J. (2000). Distribution of ganglioside GM1 in L-alpha-dipalmitoylphosphatidylcholine/cholesterol monolayers: a model for lipid rafts. Biophys. J 79, 2768–2781.[Medline]
Zhou, X. and Arthur, G. (1992). Improved procedures for the determination of lipid phosphorus by malachite green. J. Lipid Res 33, 1233–1236.[Abstract]
This article has been cited by other articles:
