![[Feedback]](/icons/banner/feedbackACT.gif){kind=icon}
![[For Subscribers]](/icons/banner/subscriberACT.gif){kind=icon}
![[Archive]](/icons/banner/archiveACT.gif){kind=icon}
![[Search]](/icons/banner/searchACT.gif){kind=icon}
![[Contents]](/icons/banner/tocACT.gif){kind=icon}
|
|
|
|
|
||
Vol. 18, Issue 6, 2254-2263, June 2007
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Department of Genetics, Cell Biology, and Development, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455
Submitted October 27, 2006;
Revised March 19, 2007;
Accepted March 30, 2007
Monitoring Editor: Susan Wente
 |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
 TOP ABSTRACT INTRODUCTIONMATERIALS AND METHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONREFERENCES |
|---|
|
INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
TOPABSTRACTINTRODUCTIONMATERIALS AND METHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONREFERENCES |
|---|
; Kloc and Etkin, 2005; Shav-Tal and Singer, 2005). In Drosophila, the maternal mRNAs and proteins required for oocyte specification and growth are synthesized in nurse cells and delivered to the oocyte through the connecting ring canals (St Johnston, 2005; Steinhauer and Kalderon, 2006). Within the oocyte, the positional determinants that establish the major body axes of the embryo are deposited at discrete locations. For example, at the anterior pole, localized bcd mRNA is translated upon fertilization and directs formation of the anterior head and thoracic segments of the embryo. At the posterior pole, localized oskar mRNA triggers pole plasm assembly and specifies abdominal and germline development.
Recent studies suggest that both dynein and kinesin I motor proteins are required for the proper localization of maternal determinants (Brendza et al., 2000; Duncan and Warrior, 2002; Januschke et al., 2002; Palacios and St Johnston, 2002). However, it remains unclear which RNPs are actively transported along microtubules and by what motors. Motor proteins serve multiple functions in cells; thus, disruption of motor function in oocytes could indirectly affect the localization of determinants. In addition, motor proteins may act cooperatively in the localization of RNPs (Brendza et al., 2002; Duncan and Warrior, 2002; Januschke et al., 2002). In this case, disruption of one motor's function could interfere with the activity of another motor, further complicating the interpretation of the outcome.
For transport events in the nurse cell compartment, previous studies suggest a model in which motors and associated cargoes move along a polarized microtubule track that leads from the nurse cells, through ring canals into the oocyte (Koch and Spitzer, 1983; Pokrywka and Stephenson, 1991; Theurkauf et al., 1993). At mid-oogenesis (stages 7–9), the highly polarized microtubule cytoskeleton is reorganized. The cytoplasmic microtubules within the nurse cell compartment become randomly oriented, and a distinct cluster of microtubules assembles at the ring canals and extends into the nurse cell cytoplasm. The transport of maternal determinants along these microtubules was first directly visualized using a functional green fluorescent protein (GFP)-tagged Exuperantia (GFP-Exu) fusion protein. Exu assembles with bcd mRNA in nurse cells, and it is actively transported along microtubules to achieve proper localization of bcd mRNA at the anterior of the oocyte (Theurkauf and Hazelrigg, 1998; Cha et al., 2001). Dynein is also known to accumulate in the early oocyte, and mutations in dynein block this accumulation (McGrail and Hays, 1997; Navarro et al., 2004).
Within the oocyte, reorganization of the microtubule cytoskeleton is also a key event in the sorting of maternal mRNA determinants and embryonic patterning. Once delivered to the oocyte, anterior and posterior determinants are deposited at opposite ends, but the mechanisms underlying transport and localization are not well understood. Early models favored a polarized microtubule organization in which the minus end nucleation of microtubules was predominantly restricted to the anterior cortex and microtubule plus ends projected toward the posterior pole of the oocyte. Based on this polarity, plus end motors were predicted to deposit posterior determinants, whereas minus ends motors delivered determinants to the anterior cortex. However, more recent studies suggest there is no simple polarized array of microtubules that spans the anterior–posterior axis (Cha et al., 2001). Instead, microtubules seem to nucleate along the entire cortex and project at random directions to generate a microtubule network. How determinants become targeted to the anterior and posterior poles of the oocyte remains to be explained. In late stages of oogenesis, maintenance of bcd at the anterior of the oocyte seems to require continual transport (Weil et al., 2006). Whether dynein and kinesin actively transport RNP determinants along microtubules is only beginning to be addressed by the direct visualization of RNP transport in wild-type and mutant backgrounds (Weil et al., 2006). In an alternative mechanism known as cytoplasmic streaming, RNPs may be moved nonspecifically throughout the ooplasm and then selectively retained by localized anchors at the proper locations (Glotzer et al., 1997; Forrest and Gavis, 2003). Although it is known that microtubules and the kinesin motor are required for cytoplasmic streaming, the extent to which this process contributes to the localization of anterior and posterior determinants is uncertain.
In the present study, we directly test the role of dynein and kinesin I in the active transport of the bcd anterior determinant in live egg chambers. We use GFP-Exu as well as fluorescently labeled bcd RNA to monitor the motile behavior of bcd RNPs in nurse cells and mid-staged oocytes. The fast acquisition of images allows us to visualize and quantitate the directed transport of RNPs along microtubules in wild-type and motor mutant backgrounds. The results show that dynein actively transports the bcd determinant along microtubules within the nurse cells and oocyte.
|
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
TOPABSTRACTINTRODUCTIONMATERIALS AND METHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONREFERENCES |
|---|
. Dhc64C transgenic flies are described in McGrail and Hays, 1997. OregonR were wild-type flies, except where noted.
Genetic Crosses
Dhc64C mutant ovaries were generated from w; Dhc6-12/TM6B males crossed to GFP-Exu; Dhc6-6/TM6B or GFP-Staufen, Dhc6-6/TM6B virgins. Progeny expressing GFP-Exu or GFP-Staufen in the Dhc6-6/Dhc6-12 background were examined; balanced siblings were used as controls. To analyze UASp-
Gl expression in ovaries, GFP-Exu or GFP-Staufen virgins were crossed to UASp-Gl/CyO; nos-GAL4/TM6B males. Progeny expressing UASp-Gl and nos-GAL4 in the GFP-Exu or GFP-Staufen background were examined; control siblings lacked the nos-GAL4 driver. Neuronal expression of the UASp-Gl construct was driven with the elav-GAL4 driver. All germline clones were generated by the FLP recombinase system (Chou et al., 1993; Chou and Perrimon, 1996) using ovoD1 (Granadino et al., 1992). Eggs were collected for 2–3 d and then larvae were heat shocked as first, second, and third instar for 2 h at 37°C.
Confocal Imaging in Living Egg Chambers
Ovaries were dissected into halocarbon oil, and individual egg chambers were teased apart. Each sample was derived from a separate female [Table 1, n particle (n sequence)]. Images were acquired using a Nikon Eclipse TE200 inverted microscope equipped with the PerkinElmer confocal imaging system (PerkinElmer Life and Analytical Sciences, Boston, MA), and Hamamatsu's Orca-ER digital camera. GFP-particle movements in nurse cells were captured at 1-s intervals and 2 x 2 binning by using a 60x Planapo (numerical aperture [NA] 1.4) objective. Cytoplasmic streaming was imaged at 30-s intervals, with five optical Z-sections of 2-µm spacing using a 40x Planfluor (NA 1.3) objective. GFP-Exu particle disassembly was imaged at 1-s intervals, with 12, 2-µm optical sections and 2 x 2 binning using a 100x Planapo (NA 1.4) objective. GFP-particle localization (Supplemental Figure 3) was imaged with 1 x 1 binning and a 40x Planfluor objective, and optical sections of 1 µm were collected.
|
). Microtubules were visualized with a fluorescein isothiocyanate-conjugated DM1A anti-
-tubulin antibody (1:200; Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO). Actin was visualized using tetramethylrhodamine B isothiocyanate-labeled phalloidin (1:1000; Sigma-Aldrich). The distribution of cytoskeletal filaments was imaged with a 40x Planfluor or 100x Planapo objective by using 1 x 1 binning with optical sections of 1 µm.
Rate Analysis
GFP-tagged RNP velocity and run-length were manually tracked with MetaMorph (Molecular Devices, Sunnyvale, CA) image analysis software's "track points" function. Each particle displaying movement in a linear manner for four consecutive frames was selected for analysis. The cursor was placed at the leading edge of each particle in the direction of the movement. The X and Y positions of this particle were recorded. As the particle moved in each subsequent frame, the cursor was moved to the new position of the leading edge, and the new X and Y positions of this particle were recorded. This procedure continued until the particle ceased moving, or moved out of the plane of focus; consequently, the measurements of run-lengths are underestimates.
Intensity Measurements
Intensity measurements were performed with MetaMorph (Molecular Devices) image analysis software's "region measurements" function. Particle intensity measurements were derived from seven egg chambers. For each egg chamber, the average intensity of 12 particles within the nurse cells, and 12 particles within the oocyte were determined. A circle of 1.69 µm2 in area was used for all the measurements. For measurements of cytoplasmic intensity, 17 egg chambers were examined. For each egg chamber, the average intensity of five 5-µm-long line-scans in the nurse cells and in the oocyte was determined. All line-scans were perpendicular and adjacent to the nurse cell/oocyte membrane, and they were placed where there were no formed particles present. Mean intensities were calculated for the nurse cells and the oocyte.
Statistical Calculations
The average velocity and total run-length for each motile particle were calculated using Excel (Microsoft, Redmond, WA), as was the SD for velocity and run-lengths for all particles measured in each genotype. The velocity, run-length, and frequency for each mutant genotype were directly compared with those of wild-type controls. All statistical significance calculations were determined by using the Student's t test on unpaired data with unequal variance. Significance was established if the resulting p value was <0.05.
Injection of Fluorescently Labeled bcd mRNA
Full-length bcd mRNA was prepared by in vitro transcription as described in Cha and Theurkauf (2001). bcd mRNA was injected into the oocytes of wild-type, Khc27 and UASp-Gl egg chambers, or, in some experiments, injected into nurse cells and then transferred to wild-type or mutant oocytes. To examine cortical localization, time-lapse sequences were acquired at 60x Planapo objective by using 2 x 2 binning collecting five optical sections at 2-µm intervals, at a time interval of 30 s for 10 min. bcd particle transport sequences in oocytes were acquired with a 100x Planapo objective using 2 x 2 binning with 1-s exposure for 2–3 min. Colocalization studies of GFP-Exu and bcd were acquired with a 100x Planapo objective by using 2 x 2 binning with 1-s exposure for each wavelength, and a settle frame.
|
RESULTS |
|---|
|
TOPABSTRACTINTRODUCTIONMATERIALS AND METHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONREFERENCES |
|---|
; Cha et al., 2001).
|
). The elevated microtubule concentration at the ring canal may facilitate RNP movements toward and through the ring canal. At greater distances from the ring canal, particles are less likely to encounter the ring canal microtubule array, and their movements are along the more randomly oriented microtubules that are present throughout the nurse cell cytoplasm (also see Theurkauf and Hazelrigg, 1998).
|
). For the present study, we built and verified a transgene, UASp-Gl, based on the original Glued1 dominant mutation (Swaroop et al., 1987) and controlled via the UAS-GAL4 system (Brand and Perrimon, 1993; Rorth, 1998) (Supplemental Figure 2, Supplemental Materials and Methods).
The transport of GFP-Exu particles in nurse cells is dramatically reduced by moderate expression of the dominant-negative Glued construct UASp-Gl (Table 1). When expression of a single UASp-Gl transgene is driven by one copy of the germline-specific nanos-GAL4 driver, the number of motile GFP-Exu particles per sequence was reduced fivefold (11 ± 4.2 in wild-type compared with 2.2 ± 1.9; p < 0.0001). The small number of GFP-Exu particles that still moved exhibited an average velocity of 0.53 µm/s ± 0.14 (p < 0.0001), significantly slower than the velocity observed in the wild-type background (Table 1).
Our second method of disrupting dynein function to determine its impact on RNP particle transport uses mutations in the dynein heavy chain. A transheteroallelic combination of the dynein heavy chain alleles, Dhc6-6 and Dhc6-12, is known to reduce the level of dynein activity. The oocyte is specified and development proceeds through late oogenesis but ultimately results in female sterility (Gepner et al., 1996). In this dynein mutant background, all aspects of GFP-Exu particle motility are significantly affected (Table 1). The number of transport events drops to an average of fewer than three motile particles per recorded sequence. The average velocity of GFP-Exu particles is also reduced (0.39 ± 0.15 µm/s; p < 0.0001), and the run-length decreased to 3.62 ± 1.6 µm (p = 0.0003). The defects in GFP-Exu RNP motility are specifically due to the loss of dynein activity, because a wild-type Dhc64C transgene fully restores wild-type transport properties in the Dhc6-6/Dhc6-12 mutant egg chambers (Table 1).
Is the requirement for dynein-based transport in nurse cells specific for anterior determinants? To address this question, we asked whether transport of the posterior determinant Staufen also depends on dynein function. In wild-type egg chambers, GFP-Staufen complexes move along linear tracks of microtubules at an average rate of 0.84 ± 0.26 µm/s with an average run-length of 5.35 ± 2.7 µm (Supplemental Movie S2). The distribution of the wild-type GFP-Staufen velocities falls into a single peak that is distinct from that observed for the GFP-Exu velocities, suggesting that they form distinct RNP particles. Our analysis shows that the UASp-Gl and Dhc6-6/Dhc6-12 mutant backgrounds also significantly disrupt transport of GFP-Staufen particles (Table 1).
A Kinesin Null Mutation Accelerates Transport in Nurse Cells
We extended our in vivo analysis to ask whether kinesin I also contributes to the transport of the GFP-Exu particles within nurse cells. To eliminate kinesin I function, we generated germline clones that were homozygous for the kinesin heavy chain null allele Khc27 (Brendza et al., 2000). Unexpectedly, we found that kinesin I seems to act as an antagonist of dynein-mediated transport of GFP-Exu within the nurse cell compartment. The velocities, run-lengths, and frequencies of transport were significantly elevated for both GFP-Exu and GFP-Staufen (Table 1). Expression of a wild-type Khc transgene in the Khc null egg chambers restores the normal transport properties observed in wild-type nurse cells (Table 1) and demonstrates that the elevated transport results specifically from the loss of kinesin I function. Elevated velocities of RNP transport are also observed in germline clones mutant for the kinesin light chain, which suggests that kinesin I binds RNPs through the light chain subunit (Table 1). Our data indicate that kinesin I negatively regulates dynein transport in the nurse cell compartment.
GFP-Exu Transport Is Regulated at the Nurse Cell/Oocyte Boundary
The transport of GFP-Exu in the nurse cell compartment is rapid and occurs along linear tracks. In contrast, the movement of GFP-Exu particles is significantly slower once they pass through the ring canals leading into the oocyte (Figure 3 and Supplemental Movie S3). The linear tracks of particle motility characteristic within nurse cells are absent in the oocyte. This result indicates that motor-dependent movement of GFP-Exu particles is down-regulated as the particles cross the ring canal entering the oocyte.
|
; Glotzer et al., 1997; Palacios and St Johnston, 2002). This slower movement within the oocyte is readily detected when the rate of image acquisition is decreased (Figure 4). In mid-oogenesis, cytoplasmic streaming is slow and uncoordinated (Palacios and St Johnston, 2002). In later stage 10b oocytes, the rate and organization of streaming increase markedly, and the bulk of the cytoplasm moves unidirectionally and orthogonal to the long axis of the oocyte.
|
Gl. Despite the strong inhibition of dynein function by UASp-Gl expression, cytoplasmic streaming in the oocyte is not affected (wild-type: 0.22 ± 0.11 µm/s; Gl: 0.21 ± 0.07 µm/s; Figure 4 and Supplemental Movie S4). Similarly, we find no change in cytoplasmic streaming in oocytes from the dynein mutant background, Dhc6-6/Dhc6-12 (Figure 4). However, cytoplasmic streaming is completely arrested in Khc27 egg chambers (Figure 4), consistent with previous reports (Palacios and St Johnston, 2002; Serbus et al., 2005). By comparison, streaming is not arrested, but only slightly reduced in klc8ex94 mutant clones (also see Palacios and St Johnston, 2002). The size and shape of the bcd RNP particles change upon entering the oocyte. We followed the fragmentation and/or complete disassembly of Exu RNP particles as they entered the oocyte from the nurse cell compartment (Figure 5 and Supplemental Movie S5). RNP particles observed in the oocyte exhibit a 19% lower fluorescence intensity than those particles in nurse cells (p < 0.0001), and the surrounding ooplasm shows a 25% elevation in the level of fluorescence compared with nurse cell cytoplasm (p < 0.0001).
|
); conversely, GFP-Staufen accumulates to the posterior cortex (Palacios and St Johnston, 2002). Disruption of dynein function by UASp-Gl or Dhc6-6/Dhc6-12 eliminates the anterior localization of GFP-Exu, whereas the posterior accumulation of GFP-Staufen is unaffected (Supplemental Figure 3A). Moreover, the introduction of a wild-type Dhc64C transgene is sufficient to rescue GFP-Exu localization (data not shown).
GFP-Exu has also been observed to accumulate along the posterior cortex in late stage 9 and 10a oocytes (Lin et al., 2006). We find that when the anterior accumulation of GFP-Exu is blocked by inhibiting dynein function, the subsequent posterior accumulation of GFP-Exu is also blocked (n = 12; Supplemental Figure 3B). This result suggests that late posterior localization of Exu is dependent on the earlier anterior localization, but the basis for this dependency is unclear.
The kinesin I-dependent process of cytoplasmic streaming may facilitate the random delivery of RNPs to the cortex for localization. If so, then the arrest of cytoplasmic streaming would be expected to diminish anterior as well as posterior accumulation. The localization of GFP-Exu at the anterior of the oocyte is largely retained in the Khc null egg chambers, although somewhat less tightly focused (Supplemental Figure 3A). In contrast, GFP-Staufen accumulation to the posterior is completely lost. Together, our results demonstrate that the dynein requirement for Exu localization is independent of kinesin.
Transport of bcd mRNA in the Oocyte Depends on Dynein Function, but Not Kinesin I Function
To test the hypothesis that dynein transports bcd mRNA in the oocyte, we imaged the behavior of fluorescently labeled bcd mRNA injected into wild-type and mutant egg chambers. After direct injection into wild-type oocytes bcd mRNA accumulates at the anterior and/or lateral cortices of the oocyte (Figure 6A wild-type panel and Supplemental Movie S6; also see Cha et al., 2001). We find that GFP-Exu is recruited to the injected RNA in the oocyte (Supplemental Figure 1B), as was previously reported for the injection of bcd RNA into nurse cells (Cha et al., 2001). This suggests that Exu retains an association with at least some population of bcd RNPs within the oocyte. To test whether dynein is the motor involved in the transport and cortical accumulation, we injected the bcd mRNA into oocytes expressing UASp-Gl. The bcd mRNA slowly diffused from the site of injection, but it failed to accumulate to the cortex in the UASp-Gl egg chambers (Figure 6A UASp-Gl panel and Supplemental Movie S7). In contrast, elimination of kinesin I activity in Khc27 oocytes did not affect the transport or cortical accumulation of the injected bcd mRNA (Figure 6A, Khc27, and Supplemental Movie S8).
|
). We examined whether such factors might influence the transport of bcd RNP within the oocyte. Following the approach of Cha et al. (2001), we injected bcd RNA into nurse cells, withdrew the assembled RNPs, and reinjected them into the oocyte. As reported previously, we find that the transferred bcd RNPs frequently accumulate at the anterior cortex (9 of 11 injections). We did, however, observe accumulation at both lateral and anterior cortices in a subset of the oocytes (2 of 11 injections). In all samples examined, cortical accumulation was dependent on dynein (n = 11), and not kinesin (n = 10), just as we observed for bcd RNA injected directly into oocytes.
At high magnification, we characterized the rapid transport of small RNP particles that assemble de novo following the injection of fluorescent bcd mRNA directly into oocytes (Figure 6B and Supplemental Movie S9; Table 2). The movement of bcd RNPs is microtubule-dependent and is blocked by the coinjection of colcemid (Cha et al., 2001). Within the oocyte, microtubules are organized as a meshwork of fibers extending from the cortex and into the oocyte cytoplasm (Figure 6C). There is a higher concentration of microtubules at the anterior of the oocyte, relative to their concentration at the posterior. Consistent with the arrangement of microtubules, the de novo bcd RNPs are rapidly transported (0.55 ± 0.15 µm/s) in random directions, but with an apparent bias toward the anterior pole (Figure 6B and Table 2). We calculated similar velocities for bcd mRNA injected to Khc null oocytes confirming that kinesin I is not essential for the transport of bcd mRNA within the oocyte. In contrast, bcd mRNA injected into UASp-Gl mutant oocytes exhibits a significantly reduced transport rate and run length. The fluorescence signal from RNPs assembled in nurse cells and transferred into the oocyte is reduced by dilution and prevents an analysis of individual particle movements within the oocyte. Nonetheless, the transferred RNPs accumulate at the cortex in a dynein-dependent manner.
|
; Emmons et al., 1995; Rosales-Nieves et al., 2006). Thus, any disruption of microtubule and/or actin filament organization by our mutant backgrounds could indirectly disrupt transport and localization of determinants described in our studies. To address this concern, we fixed ovaries from wild-type and microtubule motor mutant backgrounds, and we characterized the cytoskeletal organization of the egg chambers (Supplemental Figure 4). We find no significant difference in the microtubule network between wild-type and mutant egg chambers. Similarly, the actin distribution in wild-type and dynein mutant backgrounds are indistinguishable from each other. However, we did detect an aberrant actin cytoskeleton in the kinesin I mutant oocytes. The cortical actin network is less uniform, and we observe hollow spheres of actin within the cytoplasm of most oocytes (Supplemental Figure 4, inset). This unusual phenotype was previously described for strong alleles of swallow that fail to localize bcd mRNA to the anterior cortex (Meng and Stephenson, 2002). These results raise the possibility that strong loss-of-function kinesin I alleles affect cytoplasmic streaming and RNP localization by disturbing actin organization. |
DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
TOPABSTRACTINTRODUCTIONMATERIALS AND METHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONREFERENCES |
|---|
We identify dynein as the motor required for transport of both anterior and posterior determinants. GFP-Exu and -Staufen as well as additional RNP components (e.g., dImp; work to be reported elsewhere) depend on dynein for transport from nurse cells to the oocyte. Interestingly, the average velocity of GFP-Staufen particles is significantly faster than the transport of GFP-Exu (p < 0.0001). These observations suggest that although dynein-based transport from nurse cells to the oocyte is conserved among RNP complexes, the number of motors, their linkage, and/or their regulation may differ between mRNA complexes. Indeed, recent observations suggest that distinct mRNAs may differentially recruit motor proteins as well as potential regulators of motor activity (Bullock et al., 2006).
Significantly, the loss of kinesin activity accelerates the velocity of the GFP-Exu RNPs. Previous studies of fixed ovaries have shown that kinesin I function is required within the oocyte for oskar localization, but they suggested that kinesin I is not involved in RNP transport within nurse cells (Brendza et al., 2000; Palacios and St Johnston, 2002). Our analysis in living cells supports the conclusion that kinesin I is present on RNP particles in the nurse cells and that it functions to negatively regulate dynein-mediated RNP transport (Figure 1B and Table 1).
One possible explanation for this result is that RNP transport in nurse cells is bidirectional, with rapid switching between the dynein and kinesin motors. Although we do not observe bidirectional motion, brief reversals (<1 s) in direction are below our spatiotemporal resolution. Alternatively, the two types of motors may be engaged in a constant tug-of-war in which dynein activity overpowers kinesin and drags the particle unidirectionally. In either case, the elimination of kinesin would reduce the load on the dynein motors, yielding elevated rates of transport. A third possibility is that both kinesin and dynein bind to the same receptor on the Exu (or Staufen) RNP, but kinesin is inactive. Removal of kinesin might provide additional binding sites for dynein, cooperatively enhancing transport velocity. Whether the cooperativity of multiple motors can regulate force and velocity has recently been addressed in vivo and in vitro (Kural et al., 2005; Mallik et al., 2005; Levi et al., 2006). Although our experimental data cannot distinguish between these possible mechanisms, they do help to establish that kinesin I is present on the GFP-Exu and GFP-Staufen RNPs and can influence their transport. The regulation of opposing motors on RNPs may provide local control over the directional bias of mRNA transport in different domains within the egg chamber and embryo (Kashina et al., 2004; Ling et al., 2004; Bullock et al., 2006).
Mitochondrial distribution in Drosophila oocytes seems to depend on an antagonism between kinesin and dynein motors. Mutations in the kinesin heavy chain enhance the accumulation of mitochondria, whereas mutations in dynein reduce the number of mitochondria that enter the oocyte (Cox and Spradling, 2006). The counterbalance of motor activities on mitochondrial distribution may be mediated by the mitochondrial-specific adapter Milton. The kinesin heavy chain binds directly to Milton, but the function of Milton is independent of the kinesin light chain (Stowers et al., 2002; Glater et al., 2006). Because our results show that the ability of kinesin to antagonize dynein is dependent on both the kinesin heavy and light chains, they therefore indicate that Milton is not the adapter for RNP transport. Similar to kinesin heavy chain mutants, the velocity of RNP transport is elevated in the light chain mutant backgrounds. This is consistent with observations that the distribution of Cup, a germplasm component, is not affected by the loss of Milton function (Cox and Spradling, 2006).
Current models propose that after the anterior determinant, bcd, enters the oocyte, it is actively transported along microtubules to the anterior cortex (Berleth et al., 1988; Cha et al., 2001). We have analyzed the motility of GFP-Exu RNPs and labeled bcd RNA in vivo to show that dynein is the motor that actively transports bcd RNPs within oocytes. Our observations characterize new aspects of the pathway leading to the anterior localization of bcd mRNA in the oocyte. First, we document a striking transition in the motility of GFP-Exu particles (as well as GFP-Staufen) as they are transported across the nurse cell boundary and into the oocyte. The rapid dynein-mediated transport of GFP-Exu particles along linear microtubule tracks in nurse cells is completely suppressed once the particles cross into the oocyte. Instead, kinesin-dependent cytoplasmic streaming passively distributes RNP particles throughout the ooplasm at a reduced velocity (Figure 4) (Palacios and St Johnston, 2002; Snee and Macdonald, 2004). Our results show that neither dynein nor dynactin is required for cytoplasmic streaming. In addition, mutations that disrupt dynein function do not affect the early slow phase of cytoplasmic streaming, nor do they alter the time at which fast streaming is initiated. This latter result differs from a recent report in which the inactivation of dynein by injected antibodies resulted in the induction of fast cytoplasmic streaming (Serbus et al., 2005). An explanation of this discrepancy has not been uncovered, but it could lie in the distinction between the genetic and immunological strategies used to inhibit dynein function.
Despite the cytoplasmic continuum through the ring canal, there is an abrupt change in the motility of GFP-Exu particles at the nurse cell/oocyte boundary. This change has also been detected for GFP-Staufen (Palacios and St Johnston, 2002) and GFP-Aubergine (Snee and Macdonald, 2004). One possibility is that dynein activity on the particles is "switched off," or alternatively, released from particles as they pass through the ring canal. Moreover, the release of kinesin upon entry into the oocyte might trigger the initial induction of cytoplasmic streaming at the anterior. Perhaps a regulatory molecule or complex resides at the ring canal or associates with the network of microtubules at the anterior boundary of the oocyte. Potentially, the dense microtubule network itself could act as a physical barrier to active transport of RNP particles, although this seems unlikely given that particles readily enter the oocyte.
If active transport of GFP-Exu particles entering the oocyte is suppressed, then how does the observed microtubule-dependent, anterior accumulation of GFP-Exu and bcd mRNA occur? As previously shown, fluorescently labeled bcd mRNA injected into oocytes assembles de novo into RNP particles and accumulates along both the anterior and lateral cortices (Cha et al., 2001). In addition, RNPs assembled in nurse cells and transferred to the oocyte may preferentially accumulate at the anterior cortex. We have directly visualized the rapid, nonpolar transport of de novo bcd RNPs along microtubules, and we now show that disruption of dynein activity, but not kinesin, inhibits bcd mRNA transport. Thus, the proposed kinesin-mediated recycling of dynein is apparently not required for the anterior transport of the bcd determinant (Brendza et al., 2002; Duncan and Warrior, 2002; Januschke et al., 2002). Moreover, in oocytes, the loss of kinesin activity did not elevate the velocity of bcd RNP transport. This suggests that kinesin is either not present on bcd RNPs assembled in oocytes, or alternatively that kinesin activity on RNPs is distinctly regulated in oocytes compared with nurse cells. The distinct regulation of kinesin-based transport can be subunit dependent (Palacios and St Johnston, 2002; Ling et al., 2004; this study). In nurse cells, we find the rate of RNP particle transport is accelerated when either Klc or Khc function is removed. Yet, within the oocyte, cytoplasmic streaming is completely arrested in the absence of Khc, but it is retained in the Klc null mutant clones (Palacios and St. Johnston, 2002; this study).
Our results also clearly show that the linear paths taken by newly assembled bcd RNPs do not run directly to the cortex, but they are variably oriented relative to the anterior–posterior axis of the oocyte (Supplemental Movie S9). These indirect paths are consistent with the network of randomly oriented microtubules present in the cortical region, and they may account for the relatively slow rate of mRNA accumulation (5–10 min) at the cortex (Figure 6A; also see Cha et al., 2001). Enrichment at the anterior would result from biased transport of particles toward the region of higher microtubule density. Recent studies suggest that maintenance of bcd at the anterior of late stage oocytes requires a specialized subset of microtubules nucleated from the anterior cortex as well as dynein function (Weil et al., 2006). Cha et al. (2001) have proposed that specific nurse cell factors play a role in the transport of bcd along selected microtubules that originate from the anterior cortex (Cha et al., 2001). Similarly, in the case of the dorsal/ventral determinant, gurken, MacDougall et al. (2003) have suggested accessory factors are required to specify the microtubule subsets along which dynein-mediated transport occurs (MacDougall et al., 2003). Our comparison of the motility of bcd RNPs preassembled in the nurse cell cytoplasm versus RNPs assembled on RNA injected directly into the oocyte suggests that in both cases transport is mediated by cytoplasmic dynein. Nonetheless, it will be important to determine whether and how nurse cell factors mediate the preferential recognition of specific microtubules that leads to the restricted anterior localization of the bcd determinant.
Based on our observations, we speculate that RNP granules entering the oocyte are no longer rapidly transported but that they disassemble and/or are remodeled into smaller RNPs for delivery to their final destinations. A remodeling step provides an opportunity to modulate the transport, localization, and translational requirements for the associated RNAs (e.g., the posterior determinant, oskar mRNA, and the anterior determinant bcd mRNA). Our observation that the late posterior localization of GFP-Exu depends on its early anterior localization is consistent with the possible remodeling of RNPs. As suggested by Bullock et al. (2006) changes in RNP motor composition may only occur during the assembly steps (Bullock et al., 2006). Remodeling of RNPs may affect other steps in the mRNA localization pathway as well. For example, in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Gonsalvez et al. (2004) have shown that the anchoring of ASH1 mRNA at the tip of budding cells requires the remodeling of the Myo4p–She3p–She2p transport complex (Gonsalvez et al., 2004). More work is required to test this hypothesis and to investigate the change in RNP composition and associated motor activities.
|
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
|
Footnotes |
|---|
The online version of this article contains supplemental material at MBC Online (http://www.molbiolcell.org). 
Address correspondence to: Thomas S. Hays (haysx001{at}umn.edu)
Abbreviations used: bcd, bicoid; Dhc, dynein heavy chain; Exu, Exuperantia; Gl, Glued; Gl, truncated Glued; Khc, kinesin I heavy chain; RNP, ribonucleoprotein.
|
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
TOPABSTRACTINTRODUCTIONMATERIALS AND METHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONREFERENCES |
|---|
Boylan, K. L. and Hays, T. S. (2002). The gene for the intermediate chain subunit of cytoplasmic dynein is essential in Drosophila. Genetics 162, 1211–1220.
Boylan, K., Serr, M., Hays, T. (2000). A molecular genetic analysis of the interaction between the cytoplasmic dynein intermediate chain and the glued (dynactin) complex. Mol. Biol. Cell 11, 3791–3803.
Brand, A. H. and Perrimon, N. (1993). Targeted gene expression as a means of altering cell fates and generating dominant phenotypes. Development 118, 401–415.[Abstract]
Brendza, R. P., Serbus, L. R., Duffy, J. B., Saxton, W. M. (2000). A function for kinesin I in the posterior transport of oskar mRNA and Staufen protein. Science 289, 2120–2122.
Brendza, R. P., Serbus, L. R., Saxton, W. M., Duffy, J. B. (2002). Posterior localization of dynein and dorsal-ventral axis formation depend on kinesin in Drosophila oocytes. Curr. Biol 12, 1541–1545.[CrossRef][Medline]
Bullock, S. L., Nicol, A., Gross, S. P., Zicha, D. (2006). Guidance of bidirectional motor complexes by mRNA cargoes through control of dynein number and activity. Curr. Biol 16, 1447–1452.[CrossRef][Medline]
Cha, B. J., Koppetsch, B. S., Theurkauf, W. E. (2001). In vivo analysis of Drosophila bicoid mRNA localization reveals a novel microtubule-dependent axis specification pathway. Cell 106, 35–46.[CrossRef][Medline]
Chou, T. B., Noll, E., Perrimon, N. (1993). Autosomal P[ovoD1] dominant female-sterile insertions in Drosophila and their use in generating germ-line chimeras. Development 119, 1359–1369.[Abstract]
Chou, T. B. and Perrimon, N. (1996). The autosomal FLP-DFS technique for generating germline mosaics in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 144, 1673–1679.[Abstract]
Cox, R. T. and Spradling, A. C. (2006). Milton controls the early acquisition of mitochondria by Drosophila oocytes. Development 133, 3371–3377.
Duncan, J. E. and Warrior, R. (2002). The cytoplasmic dynein and kinesin motors have interdependent roles in patterning the Drosophila oocyte. Curr. Biol 12, 1982–1991.[CrossRef][Medline]
Echeverri, C. J., Paschal, B. M., Vaughan, K. T., Vallee, R. B. (1996). Molecular characterization of the 50-kD subunit of dynactin reveals function for the complex in chromosome alignment and spindle organization during mitosis. J. Cell Biol 132, 617–633.
Emmons, S., Phan, H., Calley, J., Chen, W., James, B., Manseau, L. (1995). Cappuccino, a Drosophila maternal effect gene required for polarity of the egg and embryo, is related to the vertebrate limb deformity locus. Genes Dev 9, 2482–2494.
Fan, S. S. and Ready, D. F. (1997). Glued participates in distinct microtubule-based activities in Drosophila eye development. Development 124, 1497–1507.[Abstract]
Forrest, K. M. and Gavis, E. R. (2003). Live imaging of endogenous RNA reveals a diffusion and entrapment mechanism for nanos mRNA localization in Drosophila. Curr. Biol 13, 1159–1168.[CrossRef][Medline]
Gepner, J., Li, M., Ludmann, S., Kortas, C., Boylan, K., Iyadurai, S. J., McGrail, M., Hays, T. S. (1996). Cytoplasmic dynein function is essential in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 142, 865–878.[Abstract]
Glater, E. E., Megeath, L. J., Stowers, R. S., Schwarz, T. L. (2006). Axonal transport of mitochondria requires milton to recruit kinesin heavy chain and is light chain independent. J. Cell Biol 173, 545–557.
Glotzer, J. B., Saffrich, R., Glotzer, M., Ephrussi, A. (1997). Cytoplasmic flows localize injected oskar RNA in Drosophila oocytes. Curr. Biol 7, 326–337.[CrossRef][Medline]
Gonsalvez, G. B., Little, J. L., Long, R. M. (2004). ASH1 mRNA anchoring requires reorganization of the Myo4p-She3p-She2p transport complex. J. Biol. Chem 279, 46286–46294.
Granadino, B., San Juan, A., Santamaria, P., Sanchez, L. (1992). Evidence of a dual function in fl(2)d, a gene needed for Sex-lethal expression in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 130, 597–612.[Abstract]
Januschke, J., Gervais, L., Dass, S., Kaltschmidt, J. A., Lopez-Schier, H., St Johnston, D., Brand, A. H., Roth, S., Guichet, A. (2002). Polar transport in the Drosophila oocyte requires Dynein and Kinesin I cooperation. Curr. Biol 12, 1971–1981.[CrossRef][Medline]
Karess, R. E. and Rubin, G. M. (1984). Analysis of P transposable element functions in Drosophila. Cell 38, 135–146.[CrossRef][Medline]
Kashina, A. S., Semenova, I. V., Ivanov, P. A., Potekhina, E. S., Zaliapin, I., Rodionov, V. I. (2004). Protein kinase A, which regulates intracellular transport, forms complexes with molecular motors on organelles. Curr. Biol 14, 1877–1881.[CrossRef][Medline]
Kloc, M. and Etkin, L. D. (2005). RNA localization mechanisms in oocytes. J. Cell Sci 118, 269–282.
Koch, E. A. and Spitzer, R. H. (1983). Multiple effects of colchicine on oogenesis in Drosophila: induced sterility and switch of potential oocyte to nurse-cell developmental pathway. Cell Tissue Res 228, 21–32.[Medline]
Kural, C., Kim, H., Syed, S., Goshima, G., Gelfand, V. I., Selvin, P. R. (2005). Kinesin and dynein move a peroxisome in vivo: a tug-of-war or coordinated movement? Science 308, 1469–1472.
Levi, V., Serpinskaya, A. S., Gratton, E., Gelfand, V. (2006). Organelle transport along microtubules in Xenopus melanophores: evidence for cooperation between multiple motors. Biophys. J 90, 318–327.[CrossRef][Medline]
Lin, M. D., Fan, S. J., Hsu, W. S., Chou, T. B. (2006). Drosophila decapping protein 1, dDcp1, is a component of the oskar mRNP complex and directs its posterior localization in the oocyte. Dev. Cell 10, 601–613.[CrossRef][Medline]
Ling, S. C., Fahrner, P. S., Greenough, W. T., Gelfand, V. I. (2004). Transport of Drosophila fragile X mental retardation protein-containing ribonucleoprotein granules by kinesin-1 and cytoplasmic dynein. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 101, 17428–17433.
Lipshitz, H. D. and Smibert, C. A. (2000). Mechanisms of RNA localization and translational regulation. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev 10, 476–488.[CrossRef][Medline]
MacDougall, N., Clark, A., MacDougall, E., Davis, I. (2003). Drosophila gurken (TGFalpha) mRNA localizes as particles that move within the oocyte in two dynein-dependent steps. Dev. Cell 4, 307–319.[CrossRef][Medline]
Mallik, R., Petrov, D., Lex, S. A., King, S. J., Gross, S. P. (2005). Building complexity: an in vitro study of cytoplasmic dynein with in vivo implications. Curr. Biol 15, 2075–2085.[CrossRef][Medline]
Martin, M., Iyadurai, S. J., Gassman, A., Gindhart, J. G. Jr, Hays, T. S., Saxton, W. M. (1999). Cytoplasmic dynein, the dynactin complex, and kinesin are interdependent and essential for fast axonal transport. Mol. Biol. Cell 10, 3717–3728.
McGrail, M., Gepner, J., Silvanovich, A., Ludmann, S., Serr, M., Hays, T. S. (1995). Regulation of cytoplasmic dynein function in vivo by the Drosophila Glued complex. J. Cell Biol 131, 411–425.
McGrail, M. and Hays, T. S. (1997). The microtubule motor cytoplasmic dynein is required for spindle orientation during germline cell divisions and oocyte differentiation in Drosophila. Development 124, 2409–2419.[Abstract]
Meng, J. and Stephenson, E. C. (2002). Oocyte and embryonic cytoskeletal defects caused by mutations in the Drosophila swallow gene. Dev. Genes Evol 212, 239–247.[CrossRef][Medline]
Navarro, C., Puthalakath, H., Adams, J. M., Strasser, A., Lehmann, R. (2004). Egalitarian binds dynein light chain to establish oocyte polarity and maintain oocyte fate. Nat. Cell Biol 6, 427–435.[CrossRef][Medline]
Palacios, I. M. and St Johnston, D. (2002). Kinesin light chain-independent function of the Kinesin heavy chain in cytoplasmic streaming and posterior localisation in the Drosophila oocyte. Development 129, 5473–5485.
Pokrywka, N. J. and Stephenson, E. C. (1991). Microtubules mediate the localization of bicoid RNA during Drosophila oogenesis. Development 113, 55–66.[Abstract]
Rorth, P. (1998). Gal4 in the Drosophila female germline. Mech. Dev 78, 113–118.[CrossRef][Medline]
Rosales-Nieves, A. E., Johndrow, J. E., Keller, L. C., Magie, C. R., Pinto-Santini, D. M., Parkhurst, S. M. (2006). Coordination of microtubule and microfilament dynamics by Drosophila Rho1, Spire and Cappuccino. Nat. Cell Biol 8, 367–376.[CrossRef][Medline]
Schroer, T. A., Schnapp, B. J., Reese, T. S., Sheetz, M. P. (1988). The role of kinesin and other soluble factors in organelle movement along microtubules. J. Cell Biol 107, 1785–1792.
Serbus, L. R., Cha, B. J., Theurkauf, W. E., Saxton, W. M. (2005). Dynein and the actin cytoskeleton control kinesin-driven cytoplasmic streaming in Drosophila oocytes. Development 132, 3743–3752.
Shav-Tal, Y. and Singer, R. H. (2005). RNA localization. J. Cell Sci 118, 4077–4081.
Snee, M. J. and Macdonald, P. M. (2004). Live imaging of nuage and polar granules: evidence against a precursor-product relationship and a novel role for Oskar in stabilization of polar granule components. J. Cell Sci 117, 2109–2120.
St Johnston, D. (2005). Moving messages: the intracellular localization of mRNAs. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol 6, 363–375.[CrossRef][Medline]
Steinhauer, J. and Kalderon, D. (2006). Microtubule polarity and axis formation in the Drosophila oocyte. Dev. Dyn 235, 1455–1468.[CrossRef][Medline]
Stowers, R. S., Megeath, L. J., Gorska-Andrzejak, J., Meinertzhagen, I. A., Schwarz, T. L. (2002). Axonal transport of mitochondria to synapses depends on milton, a novel Drosophila protein. Neuron 36, 1063–1077.[CrossRef][Medline]
Swaroop, A., Swaroop, M., Garen, A. (1987). Sequence analysis of the complete cDNA and encoded polypeptide for the Glued gene of Drosophila melanogaster. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 84, 6501–6505.
Theurkauf, W. E. (1994). Premature microtubule-dependent cytoplasmic streaming in cappuccino and spire mutant oocytes. Science 265, 2093–2096.
Theurkauf, W. E., Alberts, B. M., Jan, Y. N., Jongens, T. A. (1993). A central role for microtubules in the differentiation of Drosophila oocytes. Development 118, 1169–1180.[Abstract]
Theurkauf, W. E. and Hazelrigg, T. I. (1998). In vivo analyses of cytoplasmic transport and cytoskeletal organization during Drosophila oogenesis: characterization of a multi-step anterior localization pathway. Development 125, 3655–3666.[Abstract]
Valetti, C., Wetzel, D. M., Schrader, M., Hasbani, M. J., Gill, S. R., Kreis, T. E., Schroer, T. A. (1999). Role of dynactin in endocytic traffic: effects of dynamitin overexpression and colocalization with CLIP-170. Mol. Biol. Cell 10, 4107–4120.
Wang, S. and Hazelrigg, T. (1994). Implications for bcd mRNA localization from spatial distribution of exu protein in Drosophila oogenesis. Nature 369, 400–403.[CrossRef][Medline]
Waterman-Storer, C. M. and Holzbaur, E. L. (1996). The product of the Drosophila gene, Glued, is the functional homologue of the p150Glued component of the vertebrate dynactin complex. J. Biol. Chem 271, 1153–1159.
Waterman-Storer, C. M., Karki, S. B., Kuznetsov, S. A., Tabb, J. S., Weiss, D. G., Langford, G. M., Holzbaur, E. L. (1997). The interaction between cytoplasmic dynein and dynactin is required for fast axonal transport. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94, 12180–12185.
Weil, T. T., Forrest, K. M., Gavis, E. R. (2006). Localization of bicoid mRNA in late oocytes is maintained by continual active transport. Dev. Cell 11, 251–262.[CrossRef][Medline]
Wilhelm, J. E., Mansfield, J., Hom-Booher, N., Wang, S., Turck, C. W., Hazelrigg, T., Vale, R. D. (2000). Isolation of a ribonucleoprotein complex involved in mRNA localization in Drosophila oocytes. J. Cell Biol 148, 427–440.
| ||||||||
