QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

Vol. 18, Issue 7, 2491-2502, July 2007

This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) Supplemental Material All Versions of this Article: E06-11-1033v1 18/7/2491    most recent Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by White, A. E. Articles by Duronio, R. J. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by White, A. E. Articles by Duronio, R. J.

Developmental and Cell Cycle Regulation of the Drosophila Histone Locus Body

Anne E. White^*, Michelle E. Leslie, Brian R. Calvi, William F. Marzluff^*,,,||, and Robert J. Duronio^*,,||

*Department of Biology, Curriculum in Genetics and Molecular Biology, Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, and ^||Program in Molecular Biology and Biotechnology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599; and Department of Biology, Syracuse University, Syracuse, NY 13244

Submitted November 22, 2006; Revised April 4, 2007; Accepted April 6, 2007
Monitoring Editor: Mark Solomon

	ABSTRACT

TOP ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION MATERIALS AND METHODS RESULTS DISCUSSION REFERENCES

 
Cyclin E/Cdk2 is necessary for replication-dependent histone mRNA biosynthesis, but how it controls this process in early development is unknown. We show that in Drosophila embryos the MPM-2 monoclonal antibody, raised against a phosphoepitope from human mitotic cells, detects Cyclin E/Cdk2-dependent nuclear foci that colocalize with nascent histone transcripts. These foci are coincident with the histone locus body (HLB), a Cajal body-like nuclear structure associated with the histone locus and enriched in histone pre-mRNA processing factors such as Lsm11, a core component of the U7 small nuclear ribonucleoprotein. Using MPM-2 and anti-Lsm11 antibodies, we demonstrate that the HLB is absent in the early embryo and occurs when zygotic histone transcription begins during nuclear cycle 11. Whereas the HLB is found in all cells after its formation, MPM-2 labels the HLB only in cells with active Cyclin E/Cdk2. MPM-2 and Lsm11 foci are present in embryos lacking the histone locus, and MPM-2 foci are present in U7 mutants, which cannot correctly process histone pre-mRNA. These data indicate that MPM-2 recognizes a Cdk2-regulated protein that assembles into the HLB independently of histone mRNA biosynthesis. HLB foci are present in histone deletion embryos, although the MPM-2 foci are smaller, and some Lsm11 foci are not associated with MPM-2 foci, suggesting that the histone locus is important for HLB integrity.

	INTRODUCTION

TOP ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION MATERIALS AND METHODS RESULTS DISCUSSION REFERENCES

 
Cell cycle-regulated histone protein biosynthesis is controlled primarily through the regulation of histone mRNA abundance, which in cultured mammalian cells increases 35-fold at the G1–S transition (Breindl and Gallwitz, 1973; Borun et al., 1975; Detke et al., 1979; Parker and Fitschen, 1980; DeLisle et al., 1983; Heintz et al., 1983; Harris et al., 1991). This rapid rise in mRNA is achieved by increases in the rate of transcription initiation and pre-mRNA processing as cells enter S phase, followed by rapid degradation of histone mRNA at the end of S phase (Marzluff and Duronio, 2002). How these various aspects of histone mRNA metabolism are linked to other events that drive progression through the cell cycle by regulating the activity of the cyclin-dependent kinases (Cdks) remains incompletely understood.

In animal cells Cyclin E/Cdk2 promotes the G1-to-S transition in part by phosphorylating proteins that mediate changes in gene expression associated with the onset of DNA replication (e.g., pRb; Du and Pogoriler, 2006). These include proteins that regulate histone expression. For example, human NPAT and human HIRA are Cyclin E/Cdk2 substrates that act to stimulate and repress, respectively, histone gene transcription in cell culture experiments (Ma et al., 2000; Zhao et al., 2000; Hall et al., 2001; Nelson et al., 2002; Miele et al., 2005). How the activity of such factors is modulated by Cyclin E/Cdk2 and integrated into cell cycle-regulated histone gene expression in vivo is not known.

Cyclin E/Cdk2 may also regulate features of histone mRNA biosynthesis other than transcription, such as pre-mRNA processing. Rather than being polyadenylated, histone mRNAs terminate in a conserved stem loop structure that regulates all aspects of replication-associated histone mRNA metabolism, including biosynthesis, translation, and stability (Marzluff, 2005). This unique mRNA 3' end is formed through a pre-mRNA processing reaction that cleaves the histone pre-mRNA four to five nucleotides after the stem loop, producing mature histone mRNA (Dominski and Marzluff, 1999; Marzluff, 2005). The cleavage endonuclease complex is recruited to histone pre-mRNA by Stem Loop Binding Protein (SLBP), which binds the stem loop in the 3' untranslated region (UTR), and U7 small nuclear ribonucleoprotein (snRNP), which binds a purine-rich sequence located downstream of the cleavage site.

In mammalian cells and Xenopus oocytes U7 snRNP localizes to Cajal bodies (CBs), which are subnuclear organelles involved in several aspects of RNA metabolism, including snRNP maturation (Kiss, 2004; Cioce and Lamond, 2005; Matera and Shpargel, 2006; Stanek and Neugebauer, 2006). Histone mRNA biosynthesis is thought to occur within or near a subset of Cajal bodies. Unlike U7 snRNP, which is found in all Cajal bodies (Frey and Matera, 1995), NPAT localizes to the subset of Cajal bodies associated with histone genes (Ma et al., 2000; Zhao et al., 2000). Thus, Cyclin E/Cdk2 may regulate Cajal body function or the activity of proteins that act within Cajal bodies to regulate histone mRNA biosynthesis.

Here, we examine the connection between Cyclin E/Cdk2 activity and cell cycle-regulated histone mRNA biosynthesis in Drosophila embryos, which have provided fundamental insight into the regulation of the cell cycle and how this regulation is coordinated with development (Lee and Orr-Weaver, 2003; Swanhart et al., 2005). Drosophila nuclei contain both Cajal bodies and a distinct nuclear body that is often observed in proximity to the Cajal body called the histone locus body (HLB) (Liu et al., 2006). The HLB is associated with the histone genes, which are contained in a 5-kb sequence present in 100 tandemly repeated copies, and it is enriched in U7 snRNP particles (Liu et al., 2006). Cyclin E/Cdk2 activity is necessary for histone gene expression during embryogenesis (Lanzotti et al., 2004), but how this occurs is not known. In this report, we demonstrate that the HLB contains a cell cycle-regulated, Cyclin E/Cdk2-dependent phospho-epitope recognized by the MPM-2 monoclonal antibody.

The MPM-2 antibody was generated using a mitotic HeLa cell extract and recognizes conserved cell cycle–dependent phospho-epitopes present in a variety of proteins across many species (Davis et al., 1983). One epitope recognized by MPM-2 is a consensus Cdk phosphorylation site (Westendorf et al., 1994). MPM-2 has been used extensively to study mitotic phospho-proteins in a variety of systems (Kuang et al., 1989; Hirano and Mitchison, 1991; Yaffe et al., 1997; Logarinho and Sunkel, 1998; do Carmo Avides et al., 2001; Albert et al., 2004; Lange et al., 2005). In Drosophila ovarian cells, MPM-2 labels a spherical nuclear body whose cell cycle appearance is dependent on Cyclin E/Cdk2 activity (Calvi et al., 1998). Here, we show that MPM-2 nuclear foci are coincident with the HLB, and we exploit this finding to characterize the connection between Cyclin E/Cdk2 activity, nuclear organization, and histone mRNA biosynthesis during early Drosophila development.

	MATERIALS AND METHODS

TOP ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION MATERIALS AND METHODS RESULTS DISCUSSION REFERENCES

 
Drosophila Stocks
Slbp⁵ (Sullivan et al., 2001), stg⁴ (Edgar and O'Farrell, 1989), cyclin E^AR95 (Knoblich et al., 1994), U7¹⁴ (Godfrey et al., 2006), Df(3R)stg^AR2 (Lehman et al., 1999), the histone locus deletion Df(2L)Ds6 (Moore et al., 1983), cyclin E^hsp70 (Richardson et al., 1995), UAS:YFP-Lsm11 (Liu et al., 2006), and daGAL4 (Wodarz et al., 1995) were all described previously. cyclin E mutant embryos were unambiguously identified using a CyO P[wg-lacZ] balancer chromosome. w¹¹¹⁸ flies were used as wild type control, except in Figure 6A where a sibling embryo of the stg mutant was used as control.

Immunostaining and In Situ Hybridization
Embryos were dechorionated, fixed in a 1:1 mixture of 5% formaldehyde/heptane for 25 min or 20% formaldehyde/heptane for 10 min, and incubated with primary and secondary antibodies each for 1 h at 25°C or overnight at 4°C. Yellow fluorescent protein (YFP)-Lsm11 embryos were fixed in a 1:1 mixture of 4% formaldehyde/heptane for 20 min. Fat bodies were dissected in Schneider's media, fixed in 5% formaldehyde for 25 min, permeabilized with 0.3% Triton X-100 (Acros Organics, Fairlawn, NJ) for 45 min, blocked with 1% bovine serum albumin, and incubated with primary antibodies overnight at 4°C and with secondary antibodies for 1 h at 25°C. The following primary antibodies were used: monoclonal mouse anti-Ser/Thr-ProMPM-2 (1:1000; Upstate Biotechnology, Lake Placid, NY), monoclonal mouse anti-phospho-histone H3 (Ser10) (1:1000; Upstate Biotechnology), polyclonal rabbit anti-phospho-histone H3 (Ser10) (1:1000; Upstate Biotechnology), polyclonal rabbit anti-phospho-tyrosine (1:100; Upstate Biotechnology), chicken anti-green fluorescent protein (GFP) (1:2000; Upstate Biotechnology), monoclonal rat anti-phospho-tyrosine (1:100; R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN), and chicken anti--gal (1:1000; ProSci, Poway, CA); rabbit anti-GFP (1:2000; Abcam, Cambridge, MA); and affinity-purified polyclonal rabbit anti-Lsm11 (1:1000; gift from Joe Gall, Department of Embryology, Carnegie Institution, Baltimore, MD; Liu et al., 2006). Embryos that were hybridized with H3/H4 DNA probes, cycE^AR95, hsp70::cycE, and its control embryos were incubated overnight with anti-Lsm11 antibodies at 37°C. The following secondary antibodies were used: goat anti-mouse IgG labeled with Oregon Green 488 (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA), Cy3 or Cy5 (Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories, West Grove, PA); goat anti-rabbit IgG labeled with rhodamine red (Invitrogen), Cy2 (Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories), or Cy5 (Abcam); goat anti-rat IgG labeled with Cy3 (Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories); donkey anti-rat Cy5 (Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories); and donkey anti-chicken IgY labeled with Cy2, Cy3, or Cy5 (all from Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories). DNA was detected by staining embryos with 4,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) (1:2000 of 1 mg/ml stock; Dako North America, Carpinteria, CA) for 30 s.

Histone H3 transcripts were detected by fluorescent in situ hybridization by using digoxigenin-labeled H3 coding or H3-ds probes as described previously (Lanzotti et al., 2002). Hybrids were detected using the fluorescein tyramide signal amplification fluorescence system (PerkinElmer Life and Analytical Sciences, Boston, MA).

The histone locus was detected by fluorescent in situ hybridization with a biotin-labeled DNA probe (125 pg/µl) as described previously (Dernburg and Sedat, 1998). The probe was derived from a clone containing both the H3 and H4 genes (Lanzotti et al., 2002) that was digested with MaeIII, RsaI, MseI, and HaeIII to generate fragments of an average length of 50 base pairs. DNA fragments were biotin labeled using the BrightStar psoralen-biotin labeling kit (Ambion, Austin, TX). Before hybridization, embryos were stained with MPM-2 and anti-Lsm11 antibodies by using methods described above. Biotinylated probe was detected using the cyanine 5 tyramide signal amplification fluorescence system (PerkinElmer Life and Analytical Sciences).

Cultured Cell Immunostaining and RNA Interference (RNAi)
Dmel-2 cells were grown in Sf-900 II SFM serum-free media by using standard techniques. Double-stranded (ds)RNAs were made by in vitro transcription by using a polymerase chain reaction (PCR) product as template and T7 polymerase. The following primer pairs were used to amplify Lsm11 and PTB (control), respectively: 5'-GGTAATACGACTCACTAT AGATGGAATCGAGGGACCGGAAAAC-3', 5'-GGTAATACGACTCACTATAGCAA CAGTTCACCCTCGACACTGCC-3', and 5'-GGTAATACGACTCACTATAGTGGAA TGAATTGTTCTTTGTGAA-3', 5'-GGTAATACGACTCACTATAGGCCCATAGCG ACTACAGC-3'. Cells (2 x 10⁶) were plated in six-well plates and treated with 10 µg of dsRNA daily for 5 d, and they were split 1:1 on days 3 and 5. Knockdown was confirmed by Western blot (data not shown). Cells were fixed directly to coverslips in 10% formaldehyde for 10 min, extracted using 0.1% Triton X-100 for 15 min, and blocked with 5% normal goat serum in phosphate-buffered saline/Tween 20 for 20 min. The same antibodies and incubation times used to stain embryos were used to stain cells.

Microscopy
Confocal images were taken at a zoom of 1.0–2.0 with a 63x (numerical aperture 1.40) Plan Apochromat objective on a Zeiss 510 laser scanning confocal microscope using the LSM data acquisition software (Carl Zeiss, Jena, Germany). YFP-Lsm11 embryo images were acquired on a Zeiss 410 laser scanning confocal microscope (Carl Zeiss). Image false coloring and contrast was adjusted using Photoshop (Adobe Systems, Mountain View, CA).

Measurement of MPM-2 Focus Size
MetaMorph software (Molecular Devices, Sunnyvale, CA) was used to characterize HLB structure from confocal images. Measurements were made using a 4-µm-deep compilation of confocal images from the tip of the extended germ band in three embryos per genotype. Both the length and width of MPM-2 foci were measured using the linescan function of MetaMorph. Two perpendicular, 1-pixel-thick lines from 10 to 30 pixels in length were drawn across the nuclear MPM-2 focus in cells that contained only one MPM-2 focus. The lines were long enough to include pixels that were outside of the MPM-2 focus. The average background fluorescence was calculated by taking the mean of six randomly chosen pixels from each linescan that were outside of the MPM-2 focus. The half-maximum value for each linescan was determined by taking 50% of the difference of the peak of fluorescence in the MPM-2 focus and average background fluorescence. The number of pixels whose fluorescence fell within or equaled the half-max was summed and multiplied by a conversion factor of 0.12 µm/pixel, which was obtained from the LSM Image Browser software (Carl Zeiss). The sum of the length and width measurements in micrometers was calculated for 75 cells from wild-type and 75 cells from Df(2L)Ds6 homozygous mutant embryos. Data are reported as the average of these sums ±SD. A p value was obtained by conducting a Student's t test with two tails and unequal variance. The SE was ±0.043 for wild-type and ±0.031 for Df(2L)Ds6.

	RESULTS

TOP ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION MATERIALS AND METHODS RESULTS DISCUSSION REFERENCES

 
MPM-2 Labels the Histone Locus Body
MPM-2 labels a discrete spherical body in the nuclei of polyploid cells of the salivary gland and ovary (Millar et al., 1987; Calvi et al., 1998). To determine whether this MPM-2 body preferentially accumulates at a particular genomic locus, polytene chromosomes from squashed and whole mount salivary glands of third instars were stained with MPM-2 antibodies (Figure 1, A–A'; data not shown). MPM-2 strongly labels a single locus near the chromocenter on the left arm of chromosome 2. Interpretation of the cytogenetic banding pattern of these chromosomes indicated that this label is near or coincident with the chromosomal location of the histone gene cluster (data not shown). Cyclin E/Cdk2 activity is required for MPM-2 labeling of this subnuclear body, and for histone gene expression (Calvi et al., 1998; Lanzotti et al., 2004). We therefore hypothesized that MPM-2 recognizes a phospho-protein(s) that localizes to the histone locus body.

View larger version (66K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Figure 1. MPM-2 labels the histone locus body. (A and A') Squashed polytene chromosomes from CyO/+ third instar salivary glands were stained with MPM-2 (A; green in A') and the DNA binding dye DAPI (A'). (B–B''') w1118 syncytial blastoderm (cycle 13) embryos were stained with MPM-2 (B; green in B'''), -Lsm11 (B', red in B'''), and hybridized with an H3/H4 gene probe (B''; magenta in B'''). (C–C'') Germ band extended w1118 embryos were stained with -Lsm11 (C; red in C''), MPM-2 (C'; green in C''), and -phospho-tyrosine (P-Tyr; blue in C'') to visualize cell boundaries. Arrows and arrowheads in B and C panels indicate nuclei with one or two HLB, respectively. (D–D'') stage 12 w1118 embryo stained with MPM-2 (green in D''), -Lsm11 (red in D''), and -P-Tyr (blue in D''). Arrows indicate an S17 cell containing an MPM-2 focus that colocalizes with Lsm11. White arrowheads indicate a G117 cell lacking MPM-2 foci but containing Lsm11 in the HLB. Yellow arrowheads indicate amnioserosal cells, which have permanently exited the cell cycle in G214. Anterior is to the top and ventral to the left. Bars, 20 µm.

Cellularization takes place during cycle 14, when after the completion of S phase the nuclei pause for the first time in G2. Then, as gastrulation ensues, groups of cells in different regions of the embryo enter mitosis 14 together. These groups of cells, called "mitotic domains," enter into mitosis 14 at different times, generating a reproducible and well described pattern of mitosis (Foe, 1989). Entry into mitosis 14 requires zygotic transcription of the string^cdc25 (stg) gene, which encodes a Cdc25-type phosphatase that stimulates mitotic Cdk1 activity by removing inhibitory Y15 phosphorylation from Cdc2 (Edgar and O'Farrell, 1989). Cycles 15 and 16 are also regulated at the G2–M transition by developmentally controlled pulses of stg transcription, and still lack G1 phase as in the early syncytial cycles (Edgar and O'Farrell, 1990; Edgar et al., 1994; Lehman et al., 1999). MPM-2 and Lsm11 nuclear foci colocalize and are continuously present during interphase of these "postblastoderm" cell cycles (Figure 1, C–C''). MPM-2 foci are continuously present most likely because Cyclin E/Cdk2 activity is also ubiquitous at this time, including during G2 phase (Sauer et al., 1995).

G1 phase first occurs during cycle 17, and subsequent entry into S phase in all cell types requires zygotic expression of cyclin E (Knoblich et al., 1994). Consistent with previous observations that MPM-2 foci are Cyclin E dependent, MPM-2 only labels replicating cells where Cyclin E/Cdk2 is active (Figure 1, D–D'', arrow). Cells that have exited the cell cycle, such as those in the amnioserosa (Figure 1, D–D'', yellow arrowhead) and epidermal cells arrested in G1 (Figure 1, D–D'', white arrowhead), do not contain MPM-2 foci. In contrast, Lsm11 foci can be detected in all cells (Figure 1, arrows). Thus, the HLB is present ubiquitously, as described previously for postembryonic stages of development (Liu et al., 2006), but the MPM-2 epitope occurs at the HLB only in cells that contain active Cyclin E/Cdk2.

One obvious feature of Lsm11 and MPM-2 staining of blastoderm embryos is that each nucleus contains either one or two foci (Figure 1, B–B''', C–C'', arrows and arrowheads, respectively). Homologous chromosomes are often paired in Drosophila cells, and we therefore hypothesized that one and two foci results from paired and unpaired homologous chromosomes, respectively. In the early embryo, the pairing of homologous chromosomes is dynamic, such that the frequency of pairing at any particular locus increases as the embryo ages (Fung et al., 1998). We counted the number of cells with one or two MPM-2 foci in blastoderm embryos during interphase of cell cycle 14. At this stage, 71% of cells contained one MPM-2 focus and 29% contained two MPM-2 foci (n = 293). Fung et al. (1998) reported a pairing frequency for the histone locus of 71 and 84% at 2.5 and 4 h of development, respectively, which encompasses the cycle 14 cells we analyzed (Fung et al., 1998). By the time of germ band retraction during cycle 17, most cells contain a single focus (Figure 1D). These data are consistent with the HLB specifically associating with the histone locus (Figure 1B''') (Liu et al., 2006). Also in support of this interpretation is the observation that polyploid nurse cells in the ovary have partially unpaired sister chromatids at the histone locus and contain multiple MPM-2 foci (data not shown) (Hammond and Laird, 1985; Calvi et al., 1998). Together, these results indicate that MPM-2 recognizes an epitope at the histone locus that is a component of the Lsm11-containing HLB.

Embryonic MPM-2 Foci Depend on Cyclin E/Cdk2 Activity
If the embryonic MPM-2 foci are related to the previously described MPM-2 foci in follicle cells, then their presence should depend on Cyclin E activity. To test this, we characterized MPM-2 staining in stage 13 (cycle 17 in the epidermis) cyclin E mutant embryos relative to controls. Wild-type embryos at this developmental stage contain proliferating diploid cells in the central and peripheral nervous systems as well as endoreduplicating cells in various tissues (e.g., midgut, salivary gland, and posterior spiracles). cyclin E mutant embryos develop normally until this stage because of maternal deposition of Cyclin E, and then they arrest in G1 of cycle 17. Consequently, DNA synthesis in both proliferating neuronal cells and endoreduplicating cells is severely compromised in cyclin E mutants (Knoblich et al., 1994). We focused on endoreduplicating cells in the posterior spiracle primordium, because they are near the surface and relatively easy to image. In control embryos these cells contain robust MPM-2 foci (Figure 2, A–A', arrow). In contrast, the posterior spiracle cells of stage matched cyclin E mutants lack detectable MPM-2 foci (Figure 2, B–B', arrow), whereas they still contain Lsm11 foci (Figure 2, C–C', arrow). These data indicate that Cyclin E is not required for maintenance of the HLB, but rather for the appearance of an MPM-2 epitope at the HLB. We also performed the reciprocal experiment of Cyclin E overexpression. Epidermal cells arrest in G1 of cycle 17, and they contain Lsm11 foci but not MPM-2 foci (Figure 2D). Ubiquitous expression of Cyclin E with a heat-inducible promoter (hsp70::cyclin E) drives these G1₁₇ cells into S phase (Knoblich et al., 1994; Duronio and O'Farrell, 1995). This treatment also results in the appearance throughout the epidermis of MPM-2 foci that colocalize with Lsm11 foci (Figure 2E, arrowheads). We conclude from these data that Cyclin E/Cdk2 activity in the embryo is both necessary and sufficient to produce nuclear MPM-2 foci that colocalize with the HLB. Because histone gene expression is lost in cyclin E mutant embryos when they undergo cell cycle arrest in G1 of cycle 17, we hypothesize that MPM-2 recognizes a Cyclin E/Cdk2 substrate that contributes to histone mRNA biosynthesis. We therefore characterized embryonic MPM-2 foci in more detail.

View larger version (99K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Figure 2. Embryonic MPM-2 foci depend on Cyclin E activity. (A–C) Images of the posterior spiracles of germ band retracted (stage 13) embryos. (A) w1118 embryos stained with MPM-2 (A; green in A') and -P-Tyr (blue in A'). (B and C) cycEAR95 homozygous mutant embryos stained with MPM-2 (B; green in B') or -Lsm11 (C; red in C') and -P-Tyr (blue in B' and C'). Arrows indicate a posterior spiracle cell. w1118 control (D) or hsp70::cyclin E transgenic (E) embryos were given a 37°C heat shock for 30 min before fixation and then stained with MPM-2 (green), -Lsm11 (red), and -P-Tyr (blue). Epidermal cells of the first thoracic segment are shown. Arrowheads indicate the HLB. Anterior is to the top. Bar, 20 µm.

View larger version (134K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Figure 3. MPM-2 foci colocalize with the histone locus body in replicating cells. (A) An Slbp15 homozygous mutant postblastoderm embryo was stained with -P-Tyr (left in blue), MPM-2 (green in merge), and hybridized with a fluorescent probe that recognizes misprocessed, polyadenylated H3 mRNA as nascent transcripts in the nucleus (H3-ds; left in red). Arrows indicate a cell in S15, which contains an MPM-2 focus that colocalizes with nascent H3 transcripts. Arrowheads indicate an MPM-2 focus in a G214 cell that lacks nascent H3 transcripts. Anterior is to the top and ventral to the right. Bar, 20 µm. (B) S15 cell marked by arrows in A. Bar, 2 µm. (C) G214 cell marked by arrowheads in A. Bar, 2 µm.

View larger version (102K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Figure 4. MPM-2 and Lsm11 foci are cell cycle dependent. Postblastoderm w1118 embryos in cell cycle 14 were stained with -P-Tyr (blue), -PH3 (red), and MPM-2 (A) or -Lsm11 (B) (middle; green in merge). Arrows indicate prophase cells, arrowheads indicate metaphase cells, and yellow arrowheads indicate anaphase cells. Bar, 20 µm. Single prophase, metaphase, and anaphase cells are shown in A' and B', A'' and B'', and A''' and B''', respectively. Bars, 2 µm. Mitotic domain 5 is shown in A, and mitotic domain 1 is shown in B. Note that the rat -P-Tyr used here recognizes an antigen at the HLB and the mouse -PH3 used in B stains interphase cells weakly.

To test whether the U7snRNP is required for either MPM-2 foci or the HLB to assemble, we stained tissues from U7 snRNA mutant third instars. Because of maternal loading of U7 snRNA, the third instar is the earliest time during development when U7 snRNA is depleted and the U7 mutant phenotype occurs (Godfrey et al., 2006). We confirmed the disruption of the U7 snRNP by assaying for Lsm11, a U7 snRNP-specific protein that no longer accumulates in the HLB in U7 mutant cells (Figure 5, B and D). MPM-2 foci form in U7 mutant salivary gland-associated fat bodies and eye discs (Figure 5, A and C), as they do in SLBP mutant embryos. Similarly, the MPM-2 antigen, but not Lsm11, localizes to the HLB in U7 mutant follicle cells in the adult ovary (Gall, personal communication). Therefore, the HLB with an associated protein recognized by MPM-2 assembles independently of the U7 snRNP. To confirm this result, we performed RNAi knockdown of Lsm11 in Dmel-2 cells, and we observed that MPM-2 staining was unperturbed after Lsm11 dsRNA treatment, although the Lsm11 foci were no longer detectable (Supplemental Figure 2). In sum, our results indicate that the MPM-2 phospho-epitope and Lsm11 are detected in the HLB whether or not SLBP is present in the cell. Unlike Lsm11, however, the detection of the MPM-2 phospho-epitope in the HLB does not depend on U7 snRNA, suggesting that at least a partial HLB can form independently of an intact U7 snRNP complex.

View larger version (78K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Figure 5. MPM-2 foci form independently of the U7 snRNP. Fat bodies (A and B) and eye discs (C and D) dissected from w1118 and U714 homozygous mutant third instars were stained with MPM-2 (left; green in merge) and -Lsm11 (middle; red in merge). Fat bodies were also stained with DAPI (blue in merge). Arrows and arrowheads indicate nuclei with and without MPM-2 foci, respectively. Note that in wild type Lsm11 foci are present in cells without MPM-2 (arrowhead in C) and that Lsm11 foci are absent in the U7 mutant cells. Bars, 20 µm.

View larger version (159K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Figure 6. MPM-2 foci do not depend on string or Slbp. All embryos were stained with -P-Tyr (blue) -PH3 (red), and MPM-2 (middle, green in merge). (A) Stage-matched sibling control. (B) stg4 homozygous mutant. (C) stg Slbp double [Df(3R)stgAR2] homozygous mutant. Lack of PH3 staining was used to distinguish stg mutants from siblings. Anterior is to the top and ventral to the right. Bar, 20 µm.

View larger version (68K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Figure 7. The histone locus body forms for the first time during nuclear cycle 11. w1118 syncytial blastoderm embryos were stained with MPM-2 (left; green in merge), -Lsm11 (middle; red in merge), and -P-Tyr (right; in blue). Interphase of nuclear cycles 9–14 are shown, as indicated on the left. Bar, 10 µm.

View larger version (65K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Figure 8. Aberrant histone locus bodies form in the absence of the histone locus. Postblastoderm embryos hybridized with an H3 RNA probe (magenta) were stained with MPM-2 (green), -Lsm11 (red), and DAPI (blue). Df(2L)Ds6 homozygous mutant embryos that lack the histone gene cluster (B) were distinguished from control siblings (A) by the lack of zygotic histone H3 mRNA. Arrows indicate foci of MPM-2 and -Lsm11 that colocalize. Arrowheads indicate cells containing a focus of colocalizing MPM-2 and -Lsm11 as well as a focus of just -Lsm11. Anterior is to the top. Bar, 20 µm.

	DISCUSSION

TOP ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION MATERIALS AND METHODS RESULTS DISCUSSION REFERENCES

The identity of the protein containing the MPM-2 epitope is unknown, and there are few, if any, known Drosophila proteins with the properties one would predict for an MPM-2 target involved in histone mRNA biosynthesis. In contrast, the human NPAT protein has several of these properties and provides an example of the type of protein that may be recognized by MPM-2. NPAT is a Cyclin E/Cdk2 substrate that functions as a general activator of transcription of the replication-dependent histone genes that localizes to those Cajal bodies that are associated with histone loci during S phase (Zhao et al., 1998, 2000; Ma et al., 2000; Wei et al., 2003; Zheng et al., 2003; Miele et al., 2005). The NH₂ terminus of NPAT contains a LisH domain that is necessary for H4 transcription (Wei et al., 2003). Although there are 15 predicted LisH-containing proteins in Drosophila, no orthologue of NPAT has yet been identified. Coilin, which functions to maintain the integrity of the Cajal body, can be phosphorylated by Cyclin E/Cdk2 in vitro (Liu et al., 2000; Hebert et al., 2001; Tucker et al., 2001). However, MPM-2 does not recognize Cajal bodies in HeLa cells (White and Duronio, unpublished data), and the Drosophila Cajal body in Drosophila cells is distinct from the HLB (Liu et al., 2006). The orthologue of coilin has also not been reported in Drosophila.

HLB Behavior during Early Drosophila Development
Our cytological analysis of MPM-2 staining of the HLB during early Drosophila embryogenesis indicates that the HLB is a dynamic, cell cycle-regulated structure. As detected by MPM-2 and anti-Lsm11 staining, the HLB assembles for the first time in development during S phase of nuclear cycle 11 in the early syncytial embryo. HLB nucleation occurs during the exact same cycle that zygotic histone gene transcription begins. In frog oocytes, increasing U7 snRNA expression can induce formation of Cajal body like structures (Tuma and Roth, 1999), suggesting that in vertebrate cells U7 snRNP or nascent histone transcripts may trigger formation of Cajal bodies associated with the histone locus. Interestingly, however, HLB assembly does not require U7 snRNA or the histone locus, and therefore occurs independently of histone gene expression. We thus favor a model in which developmentally controlled HLB formation is essential for the onset of zygotic histone gene transcription.

Although the HLB is capable of forming independently of the histone locus, the histone locus contributes to the structural integrity of the HLB. In histone deletion embryos, HLBs are smaller and some interphase nuclei contain Lsm11 foci that do not colocalize with MPM-2. The size of the nucleolus is determined by the amount of ribosomal gene transcription (Hernandez-Verdun, 2006). Thus, the size and overall composition of the HLB may be similarly dependent on transcription of the histone genes. Consistent with this, MPM-2 and Lsm11 foci are present at maximal size during prophase of cycle 14, just after the initiation of histone transcription in late G2₁₄. Nascent histone transcripts are likely aborted during mitosis (Shermoen and O'Farrell, 1991), which correlates with the loss of MPM-2 and Lsm11 staining we observe in anaphase. Alternatively, reduced HLB size may be a secondary consequence of cell cycle arrest, resulting from lack of histone biosynthesis (Smith et al., 1993).

In wild-type embryos, we observe either one or two MPM-2 or Lsm11 foci per cell at frequencies similar to the known pairing frequencies of the histone loci on homologous second chromosomes (Fung et al., 1998). This is also consistent with the association of the HLB with histone genes (Liu et al., 2006). Surprisingly, we often detect one or two MPM-2 foci in histone deletion embryos, suggesting that HLB number is not dictated solely by homologous pairing at the histone locus. HLB components may associate with another chromosomal locus in the absence of the histone genes. Alternatively, the de novo formation of one or two HLBs may actually drive homologous pairing at the histone locus.

Cell Cycle Regulation of the HLB
Histone mRNA is greatly depleted in cyclin E mutant embryos (Lanzotti et al., 2004). Because cyclin E mutant embryos arrest in G1 phase, it is difficult to know this observation is indicative of a direct involvement of Cyclin E/Cdk2 in histone gene expression, or arises as a secondary consequence of cell cycle arrest. Because interphase MPM-2 foci are coincident with the HLB, are present in cells where Cyclin E/Cdk2 is active, and they are absent in cells that lack Cyclin E/Cdk2 activity, we favor the interpretation that Cyclin E/Cdk2 phosphorylates a protein directly involved in histone mRNA biosynthesis. How Cyclin E/Cdk2 participates in this process is not known, but it is not required for recruitment of U7 snRNP to the HLB, because Lsm11 remains a stable component of the HLB in wild-type cells arrested in G1 and in cells of cyclin E mutant embryos.

During the early embryonic cell cycles that have constitutive Cyclin E/Cdk2 activity, MPM-2 foci disappear as cells progress through mitosis and are undetectable by anaphase. Focal Lsm11 staining is also lost during mitosis, suggesting the disassembly of HLB components into the cytoplasm subsequent to nuclear envelope breakdown rather than simply dephosphorylation or destruction of the MPM-2 target(s). The HLB rapidly reforms during the subsequent interphase. These behaviors are similar to the behavior of NPAT foci during mitosis in cultured mammalian fibroblasts (Ma et al., 2000; Zhao et al., 2000). The nucleolus also disassembles during mitosis (Hernandez-Verdun, 2006), suggesting that dynamic disassembly/reassembly of specific nuclear compartments involved in gene expression is a general feature of nuclear behavior during metazoan mitosis.

Summary
The HLB is a dynamic structure capable of receiving input from both the histone locus and the cell cycle. Our analysis raises many questions, including how HLB assembly occurs at a specific time in a syncytial cytoplasm from abundant maternal components, even in the absence of a histone locus template, and how Cyclin E/Cdk2 regulates HLB function and histone mRNA biosynthesis. Determining the identity of the HLB protein(s) recognized by MPM-2 antigen will help answer such questions, and it will provide a useful tool to examine how the regulation of such a fundamental process as histone mRNA biosynthesis is modulated by developmental programs.

	ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

 
We are grateful to Joe Gall for generous sharing of reagents, especially Lsm11 antibodies, and of unpublished information. We thank Julie Norseen for contributing to MPM-2 polytene staining. We thank Mark Peifer for critical reading of the manuscript. This work was supported by National Institutes of Health grant GM-057859 (to R.J.D.).

	Footnotes

 
This was published online ahead of print in MBC in Press (http://www.molbiolcell.org/cgi/doi/10.1091/mbc.E06-11-1033) on April 18, 2007.

The online version of this article contains supplemental material at MBC Online (http://www.molbiolcell.org).

Address correspondence to: Robert J. Duronio (duronio{at}med.unc.edu).

Abbreviations used: CB, Cajal body; HLB, histone locus body; SLBP, stem-loop binding protein.

	REFERENCES

TOP ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION MATERIALS AND METHODS RESULTS DISCUSSION REFERENCES

 
Albert, A. L., Lavoie, S. B., and Vincent, M. (2004). Multisite phosphorylation of Pin1-associated mitotic phosphoproteins revealed by monoclonal antibodies MPM-2 and CC-3. BMC Cell Biol 5, 22.[CrossRef][Medline]

Borun, T. W., Gabrielli, F., Ajiro, K., Zweidler, A., and Baglioni, C. (1975). Further evidence of transcriptional and translational control of histone messenger RNA during the HeLa S3 cycle. Cell 4, 59–67.[CrossRef][Medline]

Breindl, M., and Gallwitz, D. (1973). Identification of histone messenger RNA from HeLa cells. Appearance of histone mRNA in the cytoplasm and its translation in a rabbit-reticulocyte cell-free system. Eur. J. Biochem 32, 381–391.[Medline]

Calvi, B. R., Lilly, M. A., and Spradling, A. C. (1998). Cell cycle control of chorion gene amplification. Genes Dev 12, 734–744.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Cioce, M., and Lamond, A. I. (2005). Cajal bodies: a long history of discovery. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol 21, 105–131.[CrossRef][Medline]

Davis, F. M., Tsao, T. Y., Fowler, S. K., and Rao, P. N. (1983). Monoclonal antibodies to mitotic cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 80, 2926–2930.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

DeLisle, A. J., Graves, R. A., Marzluff, W. F., and Johnson, L. F. (1983). Regulation of histone mRNA production and stability in serum-stimulated mouse 3T6 fibroblasts. Mol. Cell. Biol 3, 1920–1929.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Dernburg, A. F., and Sedat, J. W. (1998). Mapping three-dimensional chromosome architecture in situ. Methods Cell Biol 53, 187–233.[Medline]

Detke, S., Lichtler, A., Phillips, I., Stein, J., and Stein, G. (1979). Reassessment of histone gene expression during cell cycle in human cells by using homologous H4 histone cDNA. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 76, 4995–4999.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

do Carmo Avides, M., Tavares, A., and Glover, D. M. (2001). Polo kinase and Asp are needed to promote the mitotic organizing activity of centrosomes. Nat. Cell Biol 3, 421–424.[CrossRef][Medline]

Dominski, Z., and Marzluff, W. F. (1999). Formation of the 3' end of histone mRNA. Gene 239, 1–14.[CrossRef][Medline]

Du, W., and Pogoriler, J. (2006). Retinoblastoma family genes. Oncogene 25, 5190–5200.[CrossRef][Medline]

Duronio, R. J., and O'Farrell, P. H. (1995). Developmental control of the G1 to S transition in Drosophila: cyclin Eis a limiting downstream target of E2F. Genes Dev 9, 1456–1468.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Edgar, B. A., and O'Farrell, P. H. (1989). Genetic control of cell division patterns in the Drosophila embryo. Cell 57, 177–187.[CrossRef][Medline]

Edgar, B. A., and O'Farrell, P. H. (1990). The three postblastoderm cell cycles of Drosophila embryogenesis are regulated in G2 by string. Cell 62, 469–480.[CrossRef][Medline]

Edgar, B. A., Lehman, D. A., and O'Farrell, P. H. (1994). Transcriptional regulation of string (cdc25): a link between developmental programming and the cell cycle. Development 120, 3131–3143.[Abstract]

Edgar, B. A., and Schubiger, G. (1986). Parameters controlling transcriptional activation during early Drosophila development. Cell 44, 871–877.[CrossRef][Medline]

Foe, V. E. (1989). Mitotic domains reveal early commitment of cells in Drosophila embryos. Development 107, 1–22.[Abstract]

Frey, M. R., and Matera, A. G. (1995). Coiled bodies contain U7 small nuclear RNA and associate with specific DNA sequences in interphase human cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 92, 5915–5919.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Fung, J. C., Marshall, W. F., Dernburg, A., Agard, D. A., and Sedat, J. W. (1998). Homologous chromosome pairing in Drosophila melanogaster proceeds through multiple independent initiations. J. Cell Biol 141, 5–20.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Godfrey, A. C., Kupsco, J. M., Burch, B. D., Zimmerman, R. M., Dominski, Z., Marzluff, W. F., and Duronio, R. J. (2006). U7 snRNA mutations in Drosophila block histone pre-mRNA processing and disrupt oogenesis. RNA 12, 396–409.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Hall, C., Nelson, D. M., Ye, X., Baker, K., DeCaprio, J. A., Seeholzer, S., Lipinski, M., and Adams, P. D. (2001). HIRA, the human homologue of yeast Hir1p and Hir2p, is a novel cyclin-cdk2 substrate whose expression blocks S-phase progression. Mol. Cell. Biol 21, 1854–1865.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Hammond, M. P., and Laird, C. D. (1985). Chromosome structure and DNA replication in nurse and follicle cells of Drosophila melanogaster. Chromosoma 91, 267–278.[CrossRef][Medline]

Harris, M. E., Bohni, R., Schneiderman, M. H., Ramamurthy, L., Schumperli, D., and Marzluff, W. F. (1991). Regulation of histone mRNA in the unperturbed cell cycle: evidence suggesting control at two posttranscriptional steps. Mol. Cell. Biol 11, 2416–2424.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Hebert, M. D., Szymczyk, P. W., Shpargel, K. B., and Matera, A. G. (2001). Coilin forms the bridge between Cajal bodies and SMN, the spinal muscular atrophy protein. Genes Dev 15, 2720–2729.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Heintz, N., Sive, H. L., and Roeder, R. G. (1983). Regulation of human histone gene expression: kinetics of accumulation and changes in the rate of synthesis and in the half-lives of individual histone mRNAs during the HeLa cell cycle. Mol. Cell. Biol 3, 539–550.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Hernandez-Verdun, D. (2006). The nucleolus: a model for the organization of nuclear functions. Histochem. Cell Biol 126, 135–148.[CrossRef][Medline]

Hirano, T., and Mitchison, T. J. (1991). Cell cycle control of higher-order chromatin assembly around naked DNA in vitro. J. Cell Biol 115, 1479–1489.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Kiss, T. (2004). Biogenesis of small nuclear RNPs. J. Cell Sci 117, 5949–5951.[Free Full Text]

Knoblich, J. A., Sauer, K., Jones, L., Richardson, H., Saint, R., and Lehner, C. F. (1994). Cyclin E controls S phase progression and its down-regulation during Drosophila embryogenesis is required for the arrest of cell proliferation. Cell 77, 107–120.[CrossRef][Medline]

Kuang, J., Zhao, J., Wright, D. A., Saunders, G. F., and Rao, P. N. (1989). Mitosis-specific monoclonal antibody MPM-2 inhibits Xenopus oocyte maturation and depletes maturation-promoting activity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 86, 4982–4986.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Lange, B. M., Kirfel, G., Gestmann, I., Herzog, V., and Gonzalez, C. (2005). Structure and microtubule-nucleation activity of isolated Drosophila embryo centrosomes characterized by whole mount scanning and transmission electron microscopy. Histochem. Cell Biol 124, 325–334.[CrossRef][Medline]

Lanzotti, D. J., Kaygun, H., Yang, X., Duronio, R. J., and Marzluff, W. F. (2002). Developmental control of histone mRNA and dSLBP synthesis during Drosophila embryogenesis and the role of dSLBP in histone mRNA 3' end processing in vivo. Mol. Cell. Biol 22, 2267–2282.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Lanzotti, D. J., Kupsco, J. M., Marzluff, W. F., and Duronio, R. J. (2004). string(cdc25) and cyclin E are required for patterned histone expression at different stages of Drosophila embryonic development. Dev. Biol 274, 82–93.[CrossRef][Medline]

Lee, L. A., and Orr-Weaver, T. L. (2003). Regulation of cell cycles in Drosophila development: intrinsic and extrinsic cues. Annu. Rev. Genet 37, 545–578.[CrossRef][Medline]

Lehman, D. A., Patterson, B., Johnston, L. A., Balzer, T., Britton, J. S., Saint, R., and Edgar, B. A. (1999). Cis-regulatory elements of the mitotic regulator, string/Cdc25. Development 126, 1793–1803.[Abstract]

Liu, J., Hebert, M. D., Ye, Y., Templeton, D. J., Kung, H., and Matera, A. G. (2000). Cell cycle-dependent localization of the CDK2-cyclin E complex in Cajal (coiled) bodies. J. Cell Sci 113, 1543–1552.[Abstract]

Liu, J. L., Murphy, C., Buszczak, M., Clatterbuck, S., Goodman, R., and Gall, J. G. (2006). The Drosophila melanogaster Cajal body. J. Cell Biol 172, 875–884.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Logarinho, E., and Sunkel, C. E. (1998). The Drosophila POLO kinase localises to multiple compartments of the mitotic apparatus and is required for the phosphorylation of MPM2 reactive epitopes. J. Cell Sci 111, 2897–2909.[Abstract]

Ma, T., Van Tine, B. A., Wei, Y., Garrett, M. D., Nelson, D., Adams, P. D., Wang, J., Qin, J., Chow, L. T., and Harper, J. W. (2000). Cell cycle-regulated phosphorylation of p220(NPAT) by cyclin E/Cdk2 in Cajal bodies promotes histone gene transcription. Genes Dev 14, 2298–2313.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Marzluff, W. F. (2005). Metazoan replication-dependent histone mRNAs: a distinct set of RNA polymerase II transcripts. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol 17, 274–280.[CrossRef][Medline]

Marzluff, W. F., and Duronio, R. J. (2002). Histone mRNA expression: multiple levels of cell cycle regulation and important developmental consequences. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol 14, 692–699.[CrossRef][Medline]

Matera, A. G., and Shpargel, K. B. (2006). Pumping RNA: nuclear bodybuilding along the RNP pipeline. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol 18, 317–324.[CrossRef][Medline]

Miele, A. et al. (2005). HiNF-P directly links the cyclin E/CDK2/p220NPAT pathway to histone H4 gene regulation at the G1/S phase cell cycle transition. Mol. Cell. Biol 25, 6140–6153.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Millar, S. E., Freeman, M., and Glover, D. M. (1987). The distribution of a ‘mitosis-specific' antigen during Drosophila development. J. Cell Sci 87, 95–104.[Abstract]

Moore, G., Sinclair, D., and Grigliatti, T. (1983). Histone gene multiplicity and position effect variegation in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 105, 327–344.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Nelson, D. M., Ye, X., Hall, C., Santos, H., Ma, T., Kao, G. D., Yen, T. J., Harper, J. W., and Adams, P. D. (2002). Coupling of DNA synthesis and histone synthesis in S phase independent of cyclin/cdk2 activity. Mol. Cell. Biol 22, 7459–7472.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Parker, I., and Fitschen, W. (1980). Histone mRNA metabolism during the mouse fibroblast cell cycle. Cell Differ 9, 23–30.