|
|
|
|
Vol. 19, Issue 1, 339-351, January 2008
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Applied Microbiology, University of Karlsruhe, D-76187 Karlsruhe, Germany
Submitted June 1, 2007;
Revised October 26, 2007;
Accepted November 2, 2007
Monitoring Editor: David Drubin
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In S. pombe, a visual mutant screening for strains with bent and T-shaped cells instead of cigar-like, straight cells led to the identification of one crucial component, the Kelch-repeat protein Tea1 (Snell and Nurse, 1994
; Mata and Nurse, 1997
). This protein is transported along microtubules (MTs) to their plus ends by the CENP-E family kinesin Tea2, and it is delivered to the cell ends by the growing MTs (Browning et al., 2000
, 2003
. At the pole, Tea1 is anchored at the membrane by a second landmark protein, Mod5, which itself is prenylated, and through this lipid moiety it is attached to the membrane (Snaith and Sawin, 2003
). Because Tea1 and Mod5 accumulate at the growing cell end, they were named cell end markers. Along with a number of additional components, a large protein complex is formed, which recruits the formin For3 (Martin and Chang, 2003
). For3 is required for actin cable formation; thus, it is crucial for the orientation of the actin cytoskeleton toward the growing cell end (Martin and Chang, 2006
). Actin cables are required for polarized secretion of vesicles and hence membrane enlargement and secretion of cell wall-synthesizing enzymes (Montegi et al., 2001
).
In S. cerevisiae, several membrane-associated landmark proteins, such as Bud8 or Bud9, were described, which are absent from the S. pombe proteome (Pringle et al., 1995
; Zahner et al., 1996
; Kang et al., 2001
). Associated to the landmark proteins in S. cerevisiae, and localized at the emerging bud, is a large protein complex named polarisome that consists of a scaffold protein, Spa2; several other proteins; and characteristically the formin Bni1 (Sheu et al., 1998
). The kelch-domain protein Tea1 is conserved in S. cerevisiae (Kel1), where it is involved in mating projection formation (Philips and Herskowitz, 1998
). In contrast, Mod5 is absent from the budding yeast proteome (Philips and Herskowitz, 1998
; Snaith and Sawin, 2003
).
If the polarized deposition of landmark proteins represents the crucial step in marking the zone of growth, the question arises which molecules or factors guide the proteins to their destination. There is increasing evidence that different membrane compositions or organizations may be important marks for the polarization of cells. It is known that eukaryotic membranes are differentiated into different functional areas, named lipid rafts (Rothberg et al., 1990
; Rajendra and Simons, 2005
). They can vary in their lipid composition, and one type is characterized by a high content of sterols and is also found in fungi (Alvarez et al., 2007
). It has been shown recently that the polarization of the membrane contributes to polar growth in Candida albicans (Martin and Konopka, 2004
), but a link between the protein complexes described above and such membrane microdomains is missing.
Polarized growth is the dominant growth form of filamentous fungi. In these organisms, a structure localized in the apical dome of the hyphae and involved in polarized growth has been known for a long time, and it is named the Spitzenkörper (Girbardt, 1957
). It represents an accumulation of vesicles and it determines growth direction of fungal hyphae (Grove and Bracker, 1970
; Riquelme et al., 1998
). The exact structure and organization are still not completely understood. However, it could be an organelle-like structure rather than only an accumulation of vesicles (Wright et al., 2007
). Indeed, actin filaments have been observed in freeze-substituted samples (Howard, 1981
). Molecular analyses in Ashbya gossypii and Aspergillus nidulans revealed that polarisome components may be components of the Spitzenkörper (Sharpless and Harris, 2002
; Knechtle et al., 2003
; Harris et al., 2005
). Conversely, Crampin et al. (2005)
described the Spitzenkörper as a structure distinct from the polarisome in C. albicans. They describe several components typical for the S. cerevisiae polarisome, such as Spa2 and Bud6, localized to a cap-like structure close to the cytoplasmic membrane, whereas the formin Bni1 was localized to the Spitzenkörper. Spa2 and Bud6 orthologues, SpaA and BudA, respectively, were also studied in A. nidulans (Virag and Harris, 2006
). Deletion of either had an effect on polarized growth, but whereas SpaA could be localized at the tip, overlapping with the Spitzenkörper, BudA was only detectable at septa, indicating a role during cytokinesis. Several other S. cerevisiae landmark proteins are missing in filamentous fungal proteomes (Harris and Momany, 2004
). Orthologues of the S. pombe cell end markers and the associated machinery have not yet been studied in filamentous fungi, but genome analyses revealed that one crucial component, the prenylated Mod5 protein, was not conserved in any filamentous fungus (Snaith and Sawin, 2003
).
Previously, we showed that the deletion of the CENP-E family kinesin KipA, corresponding to Tea2 in S. pombe caused meandering hyphae (Konzack et al., 2005
). Here, we show that a protein with a similar function as Mod5, named TeaR, does exist in A. nidulans, and we show that TeaR together with a Tea1 orthologue, TeaA is involved in the initiation of polarized growth and the maintenance of straight-growing hyphae. We studied the relationship between KipA, the two cell end markers, and the formin SepA. Interestingly, the polarized localization of TeaA and TeaR depends on sterol-rich membrane domains.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
Deletion of teaA and teaR
teaA flanking regions were amplified by PCR using genomic DNA and the primers teaA1-linke-Fla-for (5'-GAGAAACGTCCATACTTCTG-3') and teaA2-linke-Fla-rev-SfiI1 (5'-TGGTGGCCATCTAGGCCCAGGAAACATTGCTTTC-3') for the upstream region of teaA and teaA3-rechte-Fla-for-SfiI2 (5'-AATAGGCCTGAGTGGCCAACAGTGCAGTGTCAC-3') and teaA4-rechte-Fla-rev (5'-CCATCTCTGGTTCGGCTTAC-3') for the downstream region, and they were cloned into pCR2.1-TOPO to generate pSK74 and pSK75, respectively. The SfiI restriction sites are underlined. In a three-fragment-ligation, the argB-gene from plasmid pSK70 was ligated between the two teaA-flanking regions, resulting in vector pSK76. The deletion cassette was amplified with the primers teaA-for-n (5'-GAAGAACCAGCAGACTTCTG-3') and teaA-rev-n (5'-CTGGTCTGCTGCTGAAATG-3'), and the resulting PCR product was transformed into the arginin-auxotrophic A. nidulans strain SRF200.
teaR flanking regions were amplified by PCR using genomic DNA and the primers teaR1-KpnI (5'-GGTACCAGATGGCTGTTGAAGTTGTC-3') and teaR2-BamHI (5'-GGATCCAGCGTCCAACAGAAGAATGT-3') for the upstream region of teaR and teaR3-NotI (5'-GCGGCCGCTACCTCTGCTATTGCAAGTAT-3') and teaR4-XbaI (5'-TCTAGATCTTGCTGGCCTTGCAGTA-3') for the downstream region and cloned into pCR2.1-TOPO, to generate pNT12 and pNT13, respectively. The restriction sites are underlined. The two teaR-flanking regions were ligated in upstream and downstream of the pyr4 marker in pNRSTE1, generating pNT14. This plasmid was cut with KpnI and XbaI, generating a fragment containing pyr4 flanked by teaR sequences. This fragment was transformed into the uracil-auxotrophic SRF200.
Transformants were screened by PCR for the homologous integration event. Single integration of the construct was confirmed by Southern blotting (data not shown). One teaA- and one teaR-deletion strain were selected from the transformants and named SSK91 and SNT33, respectively. The coupling of the observed phenotypes with the gene-deletion events was confirmed by crosses, recomplementation with tea- or teaR-derived clones, and by down-regulation of the genes through the inducible alcA promoter (see below).
Tagging of Proteins with Green Fluorescent Protein (GFP) and Monomeric Red Fluorescent Protein (mRFP) 1
To create an N-terminal GFP fusion construct of TeaA, a 0.7-kb N-terminal fragment of teaA (starting from ATG) was amplified from genomic DNA, with the primers tea_Efi_for (5'-GGGGCGCGCCCATGGCGTTCCTCTTTAAATCAAAG-3') and tea_Efi_rev (5'-GGTTAATTAATTGGTATCACCGCCAAAGACGA-3') and cloned into pCR2.1-TOPO, yielding pNT1. The restriction sites are underlined. The AscI–PacI fragment from pNT1 was subcloned into the corresponding sites of pCMB17apx, yielding pNT5. To create an N-terminal mRFP1 fusion construct of TeaA, the AscI-PacI fragment from pNT1 was subcloned into the corresponding sites of pDM8, yielding pNT6. To produce TeaA N-terminally tagged with mRFP1 under the native promoter, a 1.5-kb fragment of the teaA promoter was amplified from genomic DNA with the primers teaA-proEcoRI (5'-GGGAATTCACAAAGGCCAACAGGTGATC-3') and teaA-proKpnI (5'-GGGTACCCGTGAAATCTTATATCGTATAC-3'), digested with EcoRI and KpnI, and ligated with EcoRI-KpnI–digested pNT6, yielding pNT28 (alcA promoter replaced with the teaA promoter in pNT6). Using the same approach as for TeaA, N-terminal GFP fusion constructs of TeaR and SepA were created. The primer set used for TeaR was tear_Efi_for (5'-GGGGCGCGCCCATGGCGGGTACAGCTAC-3') and tear_Efi_rev (5'-GGTTAATTAAATACTTGATGTACTAGAACC-3'). The PCR fragment was cloned into pCR2.1-TOPO and subsequently into pCMB17apx, yielding plasmid pNT7. A 1.5-kb fragment of the teaR promoter was amplified with the primers teaR-proEcoRI (5'-GAATTCGGCTTGGCTATATGGTCTGG-3') and teaR-proKpnI (5'-GGTACCCAGCGTCCAACAGAAGAATG-3') and ligated into EcoRI-KpnI–digested pNT7, yielding pNT30 (alcA promoter replaced with the teaR promoter in pNT7). The primer set used for SepA was sepA_Efi_for (5'-GGGGCGCGCCCATGCCGACATCCGATAAAT-3') and sepA_Efi_rev (5'-GGTTAATTAACTATCCATGCGTCTCTCGA-3'). The PCR fragment was cloned into pCR2.1-TOPO and subsequently into pCMB17apx, yielding pNT9. All plasmids were transformed into the uracil-auxotrophic TN02A3 (
nkuA). The integration events were confirmed by PCR and Southern blotting (data not shown).
To introduce a point mutation in the TeaR CAAX motif, the teaR-open reading frame (ORF) was amplified with primers, tear_Efi_for (5'-GGGGCGCGCCCATGGCGGGTACAGCTAC-3') and teaR-full-c-mut (5'-TTAATTAATCACATCACGATGCCGCATC-3'). The point mutation site is underlined and in bold. The PCR fragment was cloned into pCR2.1-TOPO and subsequently into pCMB17apx, yielding pNT32 (cysteine in the CAAX motif was replaced by glycine). As a control, the teaR-ORF was amplified with primers teaR_Efi_for (5'-GGGGCGCGCCCATGGCGGGTACAGCTAC-3') and teaR-full-c (5'-TTAATTAATCACATCACGATGCAGCATC-3'), and cloned into pCR2.1-TOPO and subsequently into pCMB17apx, yielding pNT31. To create TeaR tagged with GFP at the C terminus, the teaR-ORF was amplified with primers TeaR-pENTR-for (5'-CACCATGGCGGGTACAGCTACG-3') and TeaR-pENTR-rev (5'-CATCACGATGCAGCATCC-3'), and cloned into the pENTR/TOPO vector (Invitrogen, NV Leek, The Netherlands), yielding pNT16. The fusion of TeaR with GFP at the C terminus was done with the GATEway cloning system and vector pMT-sGFP (Toews et al., 2004
), yielding pNT21.
For bimolecular fluorescence complementation (BiFC) analyses, the N-terminal half of yellow fluorescent protein (YFPN) or the C-terminal half of YFP (YFPC) was fused to the N terminus of the protein of interest. YFPN (154 amino acids of YFP and 5-amino acid linker) was amplified with primers fwd_Kpn_YFP-N (5'-CGGTACCATGGTGAGCAAGGGCGAGGAGCTG-3') and rev_YFP-N_Li_Asc (5'-CGGCGCGCCCGTGGCGATGGAGCGCATGATATAGACGTTGTGGCTGTTGTAG-3'). YFPC (86 amino acids of YFP and 17-amino acid linker) was amplified with primers fwd_Kpn_YFP-C (5'-CGGTACCATGGCCGACAAGCAGAAGAACGGCATCAAGG-3') and rev_YFP-C_Li_Asc (5'-CGGCGCGCCGTGGTTCATGACCTTCTGTTTCAGGTCGTTCGGGATCTTGCAGGCCGGGCGCTTGTACAGCTCGTCCATGCCGAGAGTGATCCC-3'). The KpnI–AscI fragment of YFPN or YFPC was ligated into KpnI- and AscI-digested pCMB17apx, yielding pDV7 (GFP replaced with YFPN in pCMB17apx) and pDV8 (GFP replaced with YFPC in pCMB17apx). To create an N-terminal YFPC fusion construct of TeaA, the AscI–PacI fragment from pNT1 was subcloned into the corresponding sites of pDV8, yielding pYH02. To produce TeaA N-terminally tagged with YFPC under the teaA native promoter, a 1.5-kb fragment of the teaA promoter was amplified from genomic DNA with the primers teaA-proEcoRI and teaA-proKpnI, digested with EcoRI and KpnI, and ligated with EcoRI-KpnI–digested pYH02, yielding pNT29 (alcA promoter replaced with the teaA promoter in pYH02). Using the same approach, kipA and sepA fragments from pSK82 (Konzack et al., 2005
) and pNT9 were subcloned into the corresponding sites of pDV8, yielding pYH05 and pYH14. To create N-terminal YFPN fusion constructs, teaA, sepA, and teaR fragments from pNT1, pNT9, and pNT7 were subcloned into the corresponding sites of pDV7, yielding pYH01, pYH03, and pYH04.
Yeast Two-Hybrid Analysis
The yeast two-hybrid analysis was performed using the MatchMaker3 Gal4 two-hybrid system (Clontech, Mountain View, CA). For bait generation, fragments of teaA cDNA corresponding to the N-terminal half of TeaA (1-674 amino acids [aa]) with primers TeaA_EFF (5'-GGCCGAATTCATGGCGTTCCTCTTTAAATC-3') and TeaA_BMR (5'-GGCCGGATCCTTAACAAGGCCTCCTGGTGG-3') or C-terminal half of TeaA (661-1474 aa) with primers TeaA_EMF (5'-GGCCGAATTCCCTCGCTCACCACGGTT-3') and TeaA_BRR (5'-GGCCGGATCCTTAGATCATATTCGCTGCCG-3') was amplified and cloned in the pGBK7 vector, which contains the GAL4 DNA-BD and the TRP1 marker, yielding pNT34 and pSH19 (Clontech). The fragments of teaA cDNA corresponding to the N-terminal half and C-terminal half of TeaA from pNT34 and pNT19, full-length teaR cDNA with primers TeaRF (5'-AAGCAGTGGTATCAACGCAGAGTGGATGGCGGGTACAGCTACG-3') and TeaRR (5'-TCTAGAGGCCGAGGCGGCCGACATGTCACATCACGATGCAGCAT-3'), and fragments of sepA cDNA corresponding to the N terminus of SepA (1–700 aa) with primers SepA,N,SMART (5'-AAGCAGTGGTATCAACGCAGAGTGGATGCCGACATCCGATAAATCG-3') and SepA,N,CDS (5'-TCTAGAGGCCGAGGCGGCCGACATGCCTCCTATCCATAGCCACATA-3') and fragments of sepA cDNA corresponding to the C terminus of SepA (715-1790 aa) with primers SepA,C,SMART (5'-AAGCAGTGGTATCAACGCAGAGTGGCAGAGCTTGTTAGATCGACTA-3') and SepA,C,CDS (5'-TCTAGAGGCCGAGGCGGCCGACATGAGCACCATCATCGGTATTGTC-3') were amplified and cloned in the pGADT7 vector, which contains the GAL4 DNA-AD and the LEU2 marker (Clontech), yielding pNT33, pNT35, pSH10, pSH12, and pSH14. pGBK7 associated plasmids were transformed in yeast Y187 (mating type MAT
) and pGADT7 associated plasmids were transformed in yeast AH109 (mating type MATa). The system uses two reporter genes (HIS3 and LacZ) under the control of the GAL4-responsive UAS. β-Galactosidase activity was analyzed by liquid culture assay using o-nitrophenyl β-D-galactopyranoside (ONPG) (Sigma Chemie, Deisenhofen, Germany) as substrate.
Light and Fluorescence Microscopy
For live-cell imaging of germlings and young hyphae, cells were grown on coverslips in 0.5 ml of MM + 2% glycerol (induction of the alcA promoter) or MM + 2% glucose (repression of the alcA promoter). Cells were incubated at room temperature for 1–2 d. For pictures of young hyphae of each gene deletion strain, the spores were inoculated on microscope slides coated with MM + 2% glucose + 0.8% agarose and grown at 30°C for 1 d. Images were captured at room temperature using an Axiophot microscope (Carl Zeiss, Jena, Germany). Images were collected and analyzed with the AxioVision system (Carl Zeiss).
N-[3-Triethylammoniumpropyl]-4-[p-diethylaminophenylhexatrienyl] pyridinium dibromide (FM4-64), Benomyl, Cytochalasin A, and Filipin Treatment
FM4-64 was used at a concentration of 10 µM in the medium. Coverslips were incubated for 5 min and washed. Filipin (Sigma Chemie) was used at a final concentration of 1, 3, 5 µg/ml in medium from a stock solution of 10 mg/ml in methanol. Benomyl, methyl 1-(butylcarbamoyl)-2-benzimidazole carbamate (Aldrich Chemical, Milwaukee, WI), was used at a final concentration of 2.5 µg/ml in medium from a stock solution of 1 mg/ml in ethanol. Cytochalasin A (Sigma Chemie) was used at a final concentration of 2 µg/ml in medium from a stock solution of 100 mg/ml in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO).
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
Deletion of teaA and teaR
To analyze the function of teaA in A. nidulans, we constructed a teaA-deletion strain (see Materials and Methods). The size of the colonies of the
teaA strain was
75% compared with that of a wild-type strain (Figure 2A). In the
teaA strain, the maintenance of growth directionality was altered. Whereas wild-type hyphae normally grow straight, the
teaA mutant showed zigzag morphology (Figure 2B). A similar effect was shown for the kinesin motor mutant
kipA (Konzack et al., 2005
). The
kipA mutant displayed curved hyphae, which are similar but not identical to the
teaA-mutant hyphae (Figure 2B). It has been revealed that the Spitzenkörper, whose position is associated with growth direction, often moved away from the center of the hyphal apex in the
kipA mutant, and the hyphae grew in the direction of the Spitzenkörper. In the
teaA hyphae, the Spitzenkörper often mislocalized and moved away from the center to one side in the hyphal apex (data not shown). The curved hyphae in the
kipA mutant and the zigzag hyphae in the
teaA mutant were most prominent in younger hyphae. In particular, most hyphae at the edge of a larger colony of the
kipA mutant looked normal, and the
kipA mutant did not show growth delay. Conversely, mature hyphae in the
teaA mutant showed hyperbranching, and colonies grew slower than wild type or the
kipA strain.
|
kipA mutant, another polarity defect has been detected in the way the second germ tube emerges from a conidiospore. In wild type, the second hypha emerges from the side of the spore opposite to the germ tube (bipolar) in 73% of the spores (Figure 2C; n = 200). In contrast, the second hyphae emerged in random positions in 80% of the spores in the
kipA mutant. A similar defect was observed in 58% of the spores in the
teaA mutant. This shows that TeaA also determines the initiation of polarity.
To explore the function of teaR, we constructed a teaR-deletion strain (see Materials and Methods). The
teaR mutant also showed the defect in the maintenance of growth directionality, and it displayed curved hyphae, which was identical to the
kipA mutant (Figure 2B), suggesting that TeaR functions in the same pathway as KipA. Likewise, the curved hyphae in the
teaR mutant were prominent in young hyphae, but they were not observed at the edge of a mature colony. Hence, the
teaR mutant did not show a growth delay when colony diameters were compared (Figure 2A). When we determined the site of the second hypha formation from a spore, we found random emergence in 85% of the spores in the
teaR mutant (Figure 2C).
To analyze the genetic interaction of kipA, teaA, and teaR, corresponding double-deletion strains were constructed by crossing. All three strains showed a curved hyphal phenotype (Figure 2B), which were identical to those in the
kipA and the
teaR mutant. The
kipA/
teaA mutant and
teaA/
teaR mutant showed a slight growth defect, although their colonies were bigger than that of the
teaA single mutant (Figure 2A), and they did not show a significant increase in branching. The
kipA/
teaR mutant showed no additional phenotype in comparison to the single mutants. All single mutants showed defects in growth directionality and only the
teaA mutant showed a growth defect. Genetic analysis indicated that deletion of kipA or teaR could partially suppress the growth defect of the
teaA mutant but not the maintenance of growth directionality.
Localization of TeaA and TeaR
To investigate TeaA localization, we constructed an A. nidulans strain expressing a GFP-TeaA fusion protein under the control of the regulatable alcA promoter (see Materials and Methods). Under repressing conditions, the strain, in which GFP-TeaA is the only source of TeaA, showed the zigzag hyphal phenotype observed in the
teaA mutant (data not shown), whereas the phenotype was restored under derepressed conditions, proving that GFP-TeaA is biologically functional. Using the same approach, we confirmed that mRFP1-TeaA was also biologically functional, and thus GFP or mRFP1 tagging did not show any difference. Under derepressed conditions, GFP-TeaA localized to one point at all hyphal tips (Figure 3A). The GFP-TeaA points always attached or localized quite close to the plasma membrane. GFP-TeaA detached from the cortex was not observed. A single GFP-TeaA spot was also observed in conidiospores before germination (bottom left). Some GFP signal spots, which were weaker compared with the point at the hyphal apex, were observed in the hyphal body (arrows). To compare the localization of TeaA and the Spitzenkörper, we stained hyphae with FM4-64. This compound has been used in several fungi to stain the Spitzenkörper (Fischer-Parton et al., 2000
; Peñalva, 2005
). The Spitzenkörper labeled by FM4-64 colocalized with GFP-TeaA at the hyphal apex (Figure 3B), although the Spitzenkörper was labeled only in a small number of tips under our experimental conditions. To confirm the TeaA localization, we constructed strains producing mRFP1-TeaA under the control of the native promoter. A strain, in which mRFP1-TeaA is the only source of TeaA, did not show the phenotype observed in the
teaA mutant, indicating that mRFP1-TeaA also was biologically functional. Although signals of mRFP1 seemed weaker, mRFP1-TeaA still localized to one point at most of the tips, and weaker signals were observed along the apex (Figure 3C, left). The single spot of mRFP1-TeaA normally localized at the center of the hyphal apex (Table 3). At a small number of tips, mRFP1-TeaA localized along the tip membrane but not to one point (Figure 3C, right, and Table 3). Hereafter, we normally used strains producing mRFP1-TeaA under the native promoter, when we analyzed the localization of TeaA.
|
|
teaR mutant (data not shown). In contrast, under derepressing conditions, the curved hyphal phenotype was restored, indicating that GFP-TeaR is functional. GFP-TeaR localized to hyphal tips and all septa (Figure 3D). GFP-TeaR localized to one point at most of the tips, and weaker signals were observed along the apex, similar to the localization of TeaA. The GFP-TeaR point also colocalized with the Spitzenkörper labeled by FM4-64 (data not shown). Sometimes, one or two smaller GFP-TeaR spots localized close to a larger point (Figure 3E). At <20% of the tips, GFP-TeaR spots aligned along the apex, but they did not localize uniform along the cortex. To study the localization of TeaR under native conditions, we constructed strains producing GFP-TeaR under teaR promoter control. The strains did not show the phenotype of a
teaR mutant, indicating the functionality of the GFP-TeaR fusion protein. The localization of GFP-TeaR was identical to that in of the alcA promoter (Figure 3F). Therefore, we used strains producing GFP-TeaR under alcA promoter control, when we analyzed the localization of TeaR. In addition, it seems that TeaR localizes to septa; however, we did not observe any alteration in septation in teaR-deletion strains (data not shown).
TeaR is assumed to localize to the plasma membrane through its prenyl residue. The nonuniform spot-like localization of TeaR at the apex may reflect sterol-rich membrane microdomains (see below). To prove the importance of the C-terminal CAAX motif in TeaR, we constructed a strain, producing TeaR (GFP tag at the N terminus) where the cysteine residue in the CAAX motif was changed to glycine by point mutation. The mutated GFP-TeaR could not rescue the phenotype of the
teaR mutant, and only weak GFP fluorescence was observed throughout the hyphae (Figure 3G), whereas GFP-tagged wild-type TeaR could rescue the phenotype of the
teaR mutant, and it localized to tips and septa (data not shown). Likewise, TeaR tagged with GFP at the C terminus, and thus masking the CAAX motif, failed to rescue the phenotype of the
teaR mutant, and it did not localize to tips and septa (data not shown). These results demonstrate that the C-terminal CAAX motif is necessary for TeaR localization and function.
Role of TeaA in Microtubule Organization at Hyphal Tips
To analyze the role of TeaA at hyphal tips, we investigated the relationship of TeaA and MTs. In wild type, MTs elongate toward the apex, reach the tip cortex, and normally converge in one point at the center of the tip. To compare the localization of TeaA and the convergence point of MTs, we constructed a strain expressing GFP-labeled
-tubulin and mRFP1-TeaA. We found that the point where GFP-MTs converged colocalized with the mRFP1-TeaA spot (Figure 4A and Supplemental Movie 1).
|
To study the behavior of MTs in a
teaA mutant, we compared wild type and
teaA strains expressing GFP-labeled
-tubulin. These strains did not show apparent differences in the number of MTs in the cytoplasm. In the tip of wild type, MTs elongated toward the apex and normally converge in one point at the center of the tip (>80% of tips during 1-min observation), and they paused there without elongating until a catastrophe event caused depolymerization. In the
teaA mutant, MTs reached the tip cortex, but sometimes they did not converge to one, but attached to several points. The phenomenon was observed at 45 tips (n = 100) during 1-min observation (Figure 4, C and E, and Supplemental Movie 2). Moreover, MTs in the
teaA mutant seemed more curved than those of wild type, and a few MTs bent around the tips. The bending of MTs could be due to continuous elongation after they reached the cortex. Bending of MTs was observed in 22 tips (n = 100) during 1-min observation in the
teaA mutant, whereas it was observed in six tips (n = 100) during 1-min observation in wild type (Figure 4, D and E, and Supplemental Movie 3).
Relationship between KipA and TeaA
In S. pombe, Tea1 is transported by the kinesin Tea2 along MT to the plus end, where both proteins accumulate. This leads to comet-like structures in time-lapse observations (Busch et al., 2004
). To test whether A. nidulans TeaA is transported by KipA, the Tea2 orthologue, we compared TeaA and KipA localization. The GFP-KipA signal accumulated at MT plus ends, moved toward the tip, and converged to the mRFP1-TeaA point at the apex (Figure 5A and Supplemental Movie 4). In contrast, TeaA was not detected at MT plus ends. This could be explained if TeaA uses a different mechanism to reach the cell tip or if TeaA accumulates at the MT plus end only to very low concentrations, below the detection level of mRFP1. To test the second possibility, we analyzed TeaA localization in a
kipA mutant. GFP- or mRFP1-tagged TeaA still localized to one point at
80% of tips, but often it did not localize to the center of the apex (Figures 5B and 7A and Supplemental Table 3). When the mRFP1-TeaA point moved away from the center of the apex to right or left side of the apex, hyphae grew in the direction of the TeaA location (Figure 5B). This result suggests that TeaA localization is involved in the determination of growth direction and that the
kipA mutant displays meandering hyphae possibly partly due to mislocalization of TeaA at tips. The Spitzenkörper labeled by FM4-64 also often mislocalized and colocalized with TeaA at the tips (Figure 5C). Besides mislocalization of TeaA to a side of the cortex at the tips, TeaA occurred as two points at <10% of the tips (Figure 5D and Table 3). The TeaA point moved along the tip cortex and divided into two points (Figure 5D and Supplemental Movie 5). To analyze further the role of KipA for TeaA localization, we checked TeaA localization in a kipA-rigor mutant, in which KipA harbors a point mutation in the ATP-binding domain (P-loop, G223E). The mutated GFP-KipA-rigor binds but does not move along MTs; thus, it decorates them (Konzack et al., 2005
). In the kipA-rigor mutant, mRFP1-TeaA still localized at 90% of the tips, but the mRFP1-TeaA point often moved away to the side of the apex and sometimes divided into two points (Table 3). These results indicate that TeaA accumulation at tips is independent of KipA, but KipA is necessary for proper TeaA anchorage at the tips. MTs visualized by GFP-KipA-rigor elongated to tips and attached to mRFP1-TeaA even if it localized to a point at the side of the apex or if mRFP1-TeaA was split into two points (Figure 5E). This supported the idea that TeaA is necessary for proper MT organization in the tip.
|
Interaction of TeaA and SepA
One of the important functions of Tea1 in S. pombe is the contribution to cell polarity and actin cable organization through interaction with the formin For3 (Feierbach et al., 2004
). Tea4, which was identified as Tea1-interacting protein, binds Tea1 and For3 directly and links Tea1 with For3 (Martin et al., 2004
). Therefore, we investigated whether A. nidulans TeaA colocalized with the formin SepA. We constructed a strain expressing GFP-SepA and mRFP1-TeaA, and we found colocalization in one point and along the apex (Figure 6A). Direct interaction of TeaA and SepA was tested with the yeast two-hybrid system, but no interaction was detected (data not shown).
|
Interaction of TeaA and TeaR
To investigate whether TeaR functions as a TeaA receptor, we constructed a strain expressing mRFP1-TeaA and GFP-TeaR, and we compared their localization. The mRFP1-TeaA point at the apex colocalized with that of GFP-TeaR at >80% of the tips, although their localization was not identical. GFP-TeaR was restricted to the tip membrane, whereas mRFP1-TeaA was observed at the membrane, and as a gradient away from the membrane (Figures 3C and 6C, top). When GFP-TeaR was observed as some spots along the membrane (Figure 3E, left), the mRFP1-TeaA point colocalized with one of the GFP-TeaR spots, but it did not accumulate at additional points (data not shown). At a few tips, several GFP-TeaR spots aligned along the apex, whereas only one mRFP1-TeaA point was visible (Figure 6C, bottom).
Colocalization of TeaA and TeaR was confirmed by BiFC analysis. The YFPN was fused to TeaR, and the YFPC was tagged with TeaA. In the strain expressing only YFPN-TeaR or YFPC-TeaA, no YFP fluorescence was detected. In contrast, in the strain expressing both YFPN-TeaR and YFPC-TeaA, YFP signals were detected as a single point and along the apex (Figure 6D). The localization pattern of the YFP signal was similar to that of GFP-TeaR. Together, the results suggest that some TeaA colocalizes with TeaR at the apex but that additional TeaA localizes to the tips independently of TeaR.
The protein-protein interaction between TeaA and TeaR was analyzed with the yeast two-hybrid system. Direct interaction between the TeaA N-terminal half and TeaR was detected, although it was weak (Figure 6E). Moreover, self-interaction of the N-terminal halves of TeaA was discovered.
We also checked possible interactions of KipA and TeaA, KipA and TeaR, KipA and SepA, and TeaR and SepA by the BiFC system, but none of these combinations resulted in YFP fluorescence (data not shown). The combination of TeaA with SepA gave a positive YFP signal, but an interaction could not be verified with the yeast two-hybrid assay.
Localization Dependency of KipA, TeaA, and TeaR
As mentioned above, in the
kipA mutant GFP-TeaA still localized to hyphal tips but often moved away from the center of the apex (Figure 5, B–D, and Table 3). Next, we studied the effect of kipA-deletion on TeaR localization. In wild type, TeaR were concentrated in the Spitzenkörper or some spots of TeaR aligned along the membrane at the apex (Figure 3, D and E), whereas in the
kipA mutant, some GFP-TeaR dots remained at the apex, but in addition, other dots moved to the subapical membrane (Figure 7A, within 10 µm from the tip). These results indicated that KipA is required for TeaR anchorage and proper TeaA positioning.
|
teaR mutant. Fluorescence of mRFP1-TeaA was not observed at hyphal tips (Figure 7B). These results indicate that TeaR is required for TeaA anchorage. In contrast, we analyzed the localization of TeaR in a
teaA mutant and found that GFP-TeaR spread away from hyphal tips (Figure 7C), indicating that TeaA is also required for TeaR anchorage. These results show that TeaA and TeaR localizations are interdependent.
Localization Dependency of TeaA, TeaR, and Sterol-rich Membrane Domains
TeaR is assumed to localize to the membrane through its prenyl residue; therefore, it could be that the membrane environment is important for TeaR localization. In other eukaryotes such membrane microdomains are important for cell signaling, polarity, and protein sorting (Rajendran and Simons, 2005
). In fungi, sterol-rich plasma membrane domains were observed by sterol-binding fluorescent dye filipin staining at tips of mating projections in S. cerevisiae (Bagnat and Simons, 2002
) and Cryptococcus neoformans (Nichols et al., 2004
), at cell ends and septa in S. pombe (Wachtler et al., 2003
), and at hyphal tips and septa in C. albicans hyphae (Martin and Konopka, 2004
). In A. nidulans, filipin stained the hyphal tip membrane and septa (Pearson et al., 2004
). In
kipA,
teaA, and
teaR strain, filipin stained the hyphal tip and septa identical to wild type (Figure 7, D and E; data not shown). Incubation of cells in high filipin concentrations, for longer times, or both has been demonstrated to alter the sterol-containing membranes and disrupt their functions (Rothberg et al., 1990
; Wachtler et al., 2003
). Therefore, we analyzed the localization of mRFP1-TeaA and GFP-TeaR under high concentrations of filipin (10 µg/ml; 5 min), and we found that GFP-TeaR was shifted from the membrane at the apex to the cytoplasm or internal membranes (Figure 7F). Filipin treatment changed also slightly the mRFP1-TeaA localization, which resembled the one in the absence of TeaR. The YFP signal from YFPN-TeaR and YFPC-TeaA also disappeared from the apex after filipin treatment (data not shown).
To investigate the effect of filipin on hyphal growth and on the localization of TeaA and TeaR in more detail, we observed the hyphal morphology under conditions with different filipin concentrations. With <1 µg/ml filipin, hyphae grew normally. Increasing filipin concentrations abolished hyphal growth, and with 5 µg/ml filipin germination was completely inhibited (Figure 8A). The control treatment with 0.05% of methanol did not show the effect. In the presence of 3–4 µg/ml filipin, abnormal hyphal morphologies were often observed (Figure 8B). Next, we investigated the effect of different filipin concentrations on the localization of TeaA and TeaR. To compare the sensitivity of TeaA and TeaR toward filipin treatment, we studied the localization of the proteins at 1, 3, or 5 µg/ml filipin (Figure 8C). Treatment with 1 µg/ml filipin for 1 h had little effect on the localization, whereas 3 µg/ml filipin caused mRFP1-TeaA and GFP-TeaR disappearance at 80% of the hyphal tips. Immediately after the treatment of 3 µg/ml filipin, filipin stained almost all the apex and the signal intensity became gradually stronger (Figure 8D). Although GFP-TeaR often moved away from the apex to subapical membrane regions immediately, mRFP1-TeaA could stay at tips for several minutes and then start to disperse around tips and finally disappear. These results suggest that filipin treatment disrupts TeaR localization and indirectly affects TeaA localization. However, the hyphae treated with filipin did not show the same hyphal morphology as
teaA or
teaR mutants. This suggests that filipin treatment disrupts not only TeaA and TeaR localization and function but also other polarity factors.
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The detailed study of TeaA and TeaR in this article revealed that main players of polarity establishment of S. pombe are conserved in A. nidulans but also that significant differences exist. For example, in S. pombe Tea1 is transported by Tea2 toward the MT plus end, with which it hitchhikes through the cell to arrive at the growing tip, whereas in A. nidulans we do not have any evidence for such a transport mechanisms. TeaA tip localization was independent of the Tea2 homologue KipA, although it was affected by an MT-depolymerizing drug. Likewise, lack of KipA only slightly affected MT plus-end localization of ClipA, the Clip-170 homologue in A. nidulans, at elevated temperature (Efimov et al., 2006
), whereas MT plus-end localization of Tip1, the Clip-170 homologue in S. pombe, strictly depended on Tea2 (Busch et al., 2004
). Nevertheless, we found that KipA is important for proper localization of TeaA and also TeaR in A. nidulans. Deletion of teaR prevents the formation of a discrete, spot-like structure of TeaA in the tip, and kipA deletion allows the formation of the spot but affects its proper localization in the tip, and finally deletion of kipA leads to spreading of TeaR along the tip membrane. These results suggest that TeaA mislocalization in the kipA mutant cannot be explained solely by the mislocalization or absence of TeaR but rather they suggest that KipA is transporting another protein, which is required for proper localization of TeaR. This is supported also by the different hyphal phenotypes of the mutants. Whereas kipA and teaR deletion produce meandering hyphae, teaA deletion caused zig-zag growth. The identification of proteins transported by KipA should help to further unravel this puzzle.
In A. nidulans, a formin, SepA, characteristic for the S. cerevisiae polarisome, was detected at the tip membrane and in the Spitzenkörper. This suggested, that the Spitzenkörper represents an organelle consisting of vesicles but also proteins, in addition to actin, required for the organization of the actin cytoskeleton (Sharpless and Harris, 2002
; Harris et al., 2005
). Here, we identified that TeaA and TeaR localized to tips and accumulated at one point at the apex, which colocalized with the Spitzenkörper stained with FM4-64, whereas the accumulation at one point is not observed in Tea1 and Mod5 of S. pombe. However, the resolution of the localization of the proteins and the Spitzenkörper may not be sufficient to really determine whether the proteins are components of the Spitzenkörper. There is evidence that TeaA and TeaR are not closely associated with this organelle. We found that the TeaA point at the tip was resistant to cytochalasin A treatment, whereas the Spitzenkörper dissolved. In contrast, SepA localization was affected by cytochalasin A. In C. albicans, it was suggested that the Spitzenkörper and the polarisome protein complex are distinct structures in the tip of growing hyphae (Crampin et al., 2005
). Thus, it could be that TeaA and TeaR define a protein complex in A. nidulans overlapping with but being distinct from the Spitzenkörper.
Our yeast two-hybrid and BiFC experiments demonstrated interaction between TeaA and TeaR. TeaA and TeaR often colocalized at the tips, but the localization was not always the same, and the TeaA point could temporarily localize to tips independently of TeaR. One explanation could be that only a fraction of TeaR interacts with TeaA. Furthermore, it has to be considered that TeaR localization was also dependent on TeaA, suggesting that TeaA could be anchored independently of TeaR at the membrane. Likewise, we found that filipin treatment first affects TeaR localization without changing obviously the localization of TeaA. Another possibility is that upon filipin treatment the interaction of TeaA and TeaR is disrupted, and TeaA just remains close to the membrane.
Although TeaA localization at tips depends on MTs, TeaA at the tips also plays a role in the regulation of MT dynamics. In the teaA-deletion mutant, some MTs did not converge at tips and other MTs failed to stop growing after reaching the tips and bent. Several proteins have been identified to regulate the MT plus-end dynamics referred to +TIPs in eukaryotic cells. In S. pombe, one of the +TIPs, CLIP-170 homologue Tip1 is revealed to interact with Tea1 at MT plus ends (Feierbach et al., 2004
). Interactions of TeaA with +TIPs in A. nidulans, such as ClipA and AlpA corresponding to CLIP-170 and Dis1/XMAP215 (Efimov et al., 2006
; Enke et al., 2007
), have to be analyzed. In the kipA mutant, the TeaA point at tips sometimes divided into a few points and MTs attached to the TeaA points (Figure 5E), suggesting TeaA accumulation at one point is associated with the convergence of MTs at the tips. The convergence of MTs at tips is possibly involved in the formation of the Spitzenkörper, because it is thought that MTs are necessary for long-distance vesicle transport toward the Spitzenkörper (Schuchardt et al., 2005
).
The effect of filipin on the distribution of the two cell-end markers, TeaA and TeaR, suggests an important role of sterol-rich microdomains in the membrane for localized insertion of the cell end factors (Alvarez et al., 2007
). Filipin has a specific affinity for sterols; thus, it integrates into regions with high sterol contents. Thereby, it possibly disturbs the structure of the membrane and, in our case, causes the mislocalization of TeaA and TeaR. There have been reports that sterol-rich lipid microdomains may play important roles in polarized growth in fungi, because they were detected in C. neoformans at bud tips and at protrusions that elongate to conjugation tubes during mating and at the tips of mating projections in S. cerevisiae and S. pombe (Bagnat and Simons, 2002
; Nichols et al., 2004
; Wachtler and Balasubramanian, 2006
). However, a link between the cell end markers and the membrane domains was missing. Recently, another tip-localized membrane protein was described in A. nidulans, MesA (Pearson et al., 2004
). This protein contains predicted transmembrane domains, and it is necessary for the stable recruitment of SepA. Whether the sterol-rich microdomains are also necessary for localization of this protein and whether it interacts with the TeaA–protein complex, remains to be uncovered.
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
Address correspondence to: Reinhard Fischer (reinhard.fischer{at}KIT.edu)
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Bagnat, M., and Simons, K. (2002). Cell surface polarization during yeast mating. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99, 14183–14188.
Browning, H., Hackney, D. D., and Nurse, P. (2003). Targeted movement of cell end factors in fission yeast. Nat. Cell Biol 5, 812–818.[CrossRef][Medline]
Browning, H., Hayles, J., Mata, J., Aveline, L., Nurse, P., and McIntosh, J. R. (2000). Tea2p is a kinesin-like protein required to generate polarized growth in fission yeast. J. Cell Biol 151, 15–27.
Busch, K. E., Hayles, J., Nurse, P., and Brunner, D. (2004). Tea2p kinesin is involved in spatial microtubule organization by transporting tip1p on microtubules. Dev. Cell 16, 831–843.
Chang, F., and Peter, M. (2003). Yeasts make their mark. Nat. Cell Biol 5, 294–299.[CrossRef][Medline]
Crampin, H., Finley, K., Gerami-Nejad, M., Court, H., Gale, C., Berman, J., and Sudbery, P. (2005). Candida albicans hyphae have a Spitzenkörper that is distinct from the polarisome found in yeast and pseudohyphae. J. Cell Sci 118, 2935–2947.
Dietrich, F. S. et al. (2004). The Ashbya gossypii genome as a tool for mapping the ancient Saccharomyces cerevisiae genome. Science 304, 304–307.
Efimov, V., Zhang, J., and Xiang, X. (2006). CLIP-170 homologue and NUDE play overlapping roles in NUDF localization in Aspergillus nidulans. Mol. Biol. Cell 17, 2021–2034.
Enke, C., Zekert, N., Veith, D., Schaaf, C., Konzack, S., and Fischer, R. (2007). Aspergillus nidulans Dis1/XMAP215 protein AlpA localizes to spindle pole bodies and microtubule plus ends and contributes to growth directionality. Eukaryot. Cell 6, 555–562.
Feierbach, G., Verde, F., and Chang, F. (2004). Regulation of a formin complex by the microtubule plus end protein tea1p. J. Cell Biol 165, 697–707.
Fischer-Parton, S., Parton, R. M., Hickey, P. C., Dijksterhuis, J., Atkinson, H. A., and Read, N. D. (2000). Confocal microscopy of FM4-64 as a tool for analysing endocytosis and vesicle trafficking in living fungal hyphae. J. Microsc 198, 246–259.[Medline]