|
|
|
|
Vol. 19, Issue 5, 2051-2058, May 2008
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Department of Cell Biology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75390-9039
Submitted September 18, 2007;
Revised February 6, 2008;
Accepted February 19, 2008
Monitoring Editor: Yu-Li Wang
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
1-mm gap between paired dermal equivalents in floating, nested collagen matrices. Our findings demonstrate that when fibroblasts interact with collagen matrices, tractional force exerted by the cells can couple to matrix translocation as well as to cell migration. | INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Type 1 collagen is the major protein component of fibrous connective tissues. These connective tissues provide mechanical support and frameworks throughout the body, and fibroblasts are the cell type primarily responsible for their biosynthesis and remodeling. Three-dimensional (3D) matrices prepared with type I collagen exhibit mechanical properties that resemble connective tissue (Barocas et al., 1995
; Wakatsuki et al., 2000
; Roeder et al., 2002
; Silver et al., 2002
; Ahlfors and Billiar, 2007
). Unlike ECM-coated material surfaces, fibroblasts can mechanically remodel collagen matrices both locally and globally (Brown et al., 1998
; Tomasek et al., 2002
; Grinnell, 2003
; Petroll, 2004
; Tranquillo, 1999
. Such mechanical remodeling of connective tissue ECM is believed to be important for tissue homeostasis (Silver et al., 2002
; Wiig et al., 2003
; Goldsmith et al., 2004
; Langevin et al., 2004
), aging (Varani et al., 2004
), repair (Tonnesen et al., 2000
; Tomasek et al., 2002
; Grinnell, 2003
), fibrosis (Eckes et al., 2000
; Desmouliere et al., 2005
), and tumorigenesis (Beacham and Cukierman, 2005
; Gaggioli et al., 2007
; Yamada and Cukierman, 2007
).
Cells interacting with 3D collagen matrices exhibit distinct patterns of cell signaling (Cukierman et al., 2002
; Wozniak et al., 2003
; Beningo et al., 2004
; Rhee et al., 2007
) and increased plasticity of cell migration (Sahai and Marshall, 2003
; Shreiber et al., 2003
; Friedl, 2004
; Even-Ram and Yamada, 2005
; Zaman et al., 2006
; Wolf et al., 2007
). We have been studying human foreskin fibroblast migration in nested collagen matrices (Grinnell et al., 2006
). To prepare nested matrices, contracted collagen matrices known as dermal equivalents (Bell et al., 1979
) are polymerized within cell-free outer matrices. Cells can migrate from the dermal equivalents into the outer matrices. Platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF) is unique among growth factors in its capacity to promote human fibroblast migration in nested collagen matrices, whereas sphingosine-1-phosphate acts as an inhibitor of migration (Jiang et al., 2008
).
Time-lapse microscopic observations of fibroblasts migrating in nested collagen matrices showed that in addition to cell migration, collagen fibril flow occurred in the outer matrix toward the dermal equivalent boundary. Features of this flow suggested that it depends on the same cell motile machinery normally used by cells for migration. Collagen fibril flow was capable of producing large-scale tissue translocation as shown by closure of a
1-mm gap between paired dermal equivalents in floating, nested collagen matrices. Our findings demonstrate that tractional force exerted by fibroblasts in collagen matrices can couple differentially to cell migration or matrix translocation.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Cell Culture and Preparation of Nested Collagen Matrices
Early passage human foreskin fibroblasts (hTERT-immortalized; Rhee et al., 2007
) were cultured in DMEM supplemented with 10% FBS at 37°C in a 5% CO2 humidified incubator. Cell migration in nested collagen matrices was performed as described previously (Figure 1A; Grinnell et al., 2006
). Briefly, dermal equivalents were formed by contraction for 6–48 h of 200-µl collagen matrices (1.5 mg/ml collagen, 2 x 105 cells/matrix). Subsequently, dermal equivalents were embedded in 200 µl outer collagen matrices containing 1.5 mg/ml collagen (Figure 1B). Nested matrices were incubated in DMEM (or CO2-independent DMEM for time-lapse studies) containing 5 mg/ml BSA and 50 ng/ml PDGF or other growth factors as indicated.
|
14-mm inner diameter). Paired nested matrices contained two dermal equivalents that were placed
1 mm apart on a 60-µl cushion of outer matrix and then covered with the remaining 140 µl of outer matrix collagen solution. Overall appearance of nested collagen matrices was recorded using an Epson 4870 photo scanner (Epson America, Long Beach, CA).
Time-Lapse Microscopy
Nested collagen matrices in 24-well culture dishes were placed in an environmental chamber at 37°C, and time-lapse microscopy was carried out using a Zeiss Axiovert 200M inverted microscope equipped with an A-PLAN 10x/0.25 PH1 Zeiss objective (Carl Zeiss MicroImaging, Thornwood, NY) and a Hamamatsu model Orca 285 CCD camera (Hamamatsu, Bridgewater, NJ). Z stack images were acquired at 20-µm steps and 5–10-min intervals using Openlab 4.02 (Improvision, Lexington, MA) software. The Z stack range was 800 µm to ensure complete coverage of the range of cell movement, which typically occurred within 100–200 µm. Each Z plane was reconstructed into a single 2D video. For quantitative analysis of cell migration and collagen translocation, the image field was calibrated with a micrometer slide, and Openlab software was used to measure displacements. In some experiments, reorganization of the collagen matrix was analyzed by visualizing the distribution of 3- or 6-µm beads embedded in the matrix. In initial experiments, we used beads coated with BSA. In later experiments, we added beads directly as supplied by the manufacturer, which was simpler because a sonication step was not required, and no differences were observed compared with albumin-coated beads.
Immunofluorescence Microscopy
Preparation of samples for actin staining with Alexa Fluor 594–conjugated phalloidin and PI was carried out as previously described (Grinnell et al., 2006
). Images of PI-stained cells used for quantification of cell migration were collected with a Nikon Elipse 400 fluorescence microscope (Melville, NY) and 10x/0.45 Nikon Plan Apo infinity corrected objective using a Photometrics SenSys CCD camera (Tucson, AZ) and MetaVue acquisition and imaging software (Molecular Devices, Menlo Park, CA). The cell migration index was calculated by counting the average number of cells that had migrated out of dermal equivalents in four 10x microscopic fields selected arbitrarily. Each field included the border of the dermal equivalent (detected by dark field microscopy) and the furthest moving cells (detected by nuclear staining with PI).
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Collagen Translocation in Nested Collagen Matrices
Figure 2A presents representative, phase-contrast images from a video (Sup_1.mov) in which individual cells can be seen migrating from the dermal equivalent into the outer matrix. Migrating cells typically had leading dendritic extensions that were branched. Some of these extensions increased in size and became stabilized during migration; others regressed. In addition to cell migration, collagen translocation occurred in the outer matrix toward the dermal equivalent interface. Collagen movement can be appreciated by noting the position of matrix deformations (Figure 2A, asterisks). In the video, collagen translocation has the appearance of collagen fibril flow.
|
The decrease in velocity of collagen translocation might have been a feature of the experimental system independent of the time when cell migration began. To test this possibility, studies were carried out using nested collagen matrices prepared with dermal equivalents that had been contracted for 48 h. With 48-h dermal equivalents, a longer lag phase precedes cell migration compared with the 6-h dermal equivalents used for the experiments described in Figures 1 and 2. Figure 3A shows representative images from the beginning and end of a time-lapse video (Sup_2.mov). During the 15-h incubation, little cell migration across the interface occurred. As can be seen in the video, collagen flow took place during this period. Polystyrene beads (3µm) in the collagen help visualize collagen flow. Quantitative measurements (Figure 3B) demonstrate that collagen translocation in the absence of cell migration reached a higher velocity than observed in Figure 2 and declined later.
|
|
|
1 mm apart in outer matrices. Figure 6A shows the experimental design and presents immunofluorescence images taken at the edge and gap regions of the paired matrices after culture for 24 h. Figure 6B shows quantification of the findings. With restrained, paired nested matrices, cell migration occurred to a similar extent around the edges of the dermal equivalents and in the gap between. With floating, paired nested matrices, migration was limited almost entirely to the gap region in between. Taken together, the findings in Figures 5 and 6 suggested that fibroblast migration in collagen matrices depended on the ability of the matrix to resist tractional force exerted by the cells. Resistance could be provided by restraint of nested matrices on culture surfaces or by the opposition between paired dermal equivalents if the nested matrices were floating in culture medium.
|
|
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Under some circumstances, collagen flow has been reported to occur within collagen matrices independent from tissue cells (Newman et al., 1985
). The collagen flow we detected in the current studies required fibroblasts and appeared to utilize the same cell motile machinery involved in cell migration. Interfering with actin or inhibiting myosin II or Rho kinase inhibited cell migration and collagen translocation. In addition, the growth factor specificity of collagen flow was similar to cell migration. Gap closure in floating, paired nested matrices took place in the presence of PDGF but not LPA or FBS. Previously, we showed that PDGF but not LPA or FBS stimulates human fibroblast migration in nested collagen matrices (Grinnell et al., 2006
). Serum frequently has been used as an agonist to study cell migration, and PDGF is believed to be the major promigratory factor for fibroblasts in serum (Li et al., 2004
; Gao et al., 2005
). However, serum also contains the lipid growth factor sphingosine-1-phosphate (Eichholtz et al., 1993
; Yatomi et al., 1997
). S1P recently was shown to be a potent inhibitor of human fibroblast migration in collagen matrices and to reduce the promigratory activity of serum (Jiang et al., 2008
).
Evidence regarding the regulatory role that Rho kinase plays in cell migration is complex. Blocking Rho kinase activity can inhibit or stimulate cell migration depending on cell type and experimental conditions (Riento and Ridley, 2003
; Totsukawa et al., 2004
). Besides for collagen fibril flow and cell migration, Rho kinase activity also is required for PDGF-stimulated fibroblast-collagen matrix contraction (Rhee and Grinnell, 2006
). Human fibroblasts in collagen lack detectable Rho activation upon PDGF stimulation (Grinnell et al., 2003
). Therefore, basal rather than agonist-stimulated Rho kinase probably is required for cell migration and contraction, perhaps by maintaining basal levels of myosin light chain phosphorylation (Abe et al., 2003
; Knock et al., 2008
).
Collagen fibril flow not only appeared to depend on the same cell motile machinery as cell migration, but also tended to occur reciprocally with migration. That is, collagen translocation was greatest before cells began to migrate in the outer matrices. Using more contracted dermal equivalents to extend the period before cell migration begins increased the period of collagen flow. Why collagen flow eventually decreased under the latter conditions even in the absence of cell migration remains to be determined. In the case of floating nested matrices, we observed decreased cell migration and increased collagen flow. Collagen flow in paired nested collagen matrices resulted in dermal equivalent gap closure if the matrices were floating.
Why there is a lag phase before cell migration begins, and why the length of the lag phase increases along with the time of dermal equivalent contraction are questions yet to be resolved. One possibility is that during the lag phase, changes occur in the cells or matrix required for fibroblasts to move from across the interface between the dermal equivalent whose collagen density can be as high as
25 mg/ml collagen (Ahlfors and Billiar, 2007
) into the outer collagen matrix composed of 1.5 mg/ml collagen. On collagen-coated planar surfaces, cells tend not to move from stiffer to softer materials (Lo et al., 2000
). Whatever the final explanation, we believe that the studies with restrained compared to floating nested matrices indicate an important role for tension. Fibroblasts in floating collagen matrices have fewer stress fibers and focal adhesions than cells in restrained matrices (Grinnell, 2003
). Based on the finding that cellular stress fibers and focal adhesions are indicators of cell tension (Singer et al., 1984
; Burridge et al., 1988
; Balaban et al., 2001
; Galbraith et al., 2002
), fibroblasts are less able to develop tension in floating compared with restrained matrices. Given that tension plays a positive role in cell migration on planar surfaces (Tucker et al., 1985
; Kolega, 1986
; Beloussov et al., 2000
; Lo et al., 2000
; Wang et al., 2001
; Raeber et al., 2007
), the decreased ability of cells in floating nested collagen matrices to develop tension (unless the dermal equivalents are paired) provides a reasonable explanation for the lack of migration.
Figure 9 offers what we believe to be an attractive hypothesis to account for our overall observations. If the collagen matrix can resist cellular tractional force, then the cells can move. If the matrix cannot resist cellular traction force, then the matrix moves. Likewise, when tissue cells attempt to spread on a silicone oil surface, if the viscosity of the oil is not sufficient to resist the pull of cell extensions, then the oil flows and the cells remain round (Harris, 1973
).
|
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
Address correspondence to: Frederick Grinnell (frederick.grinnell{at}utsouthwestern.edu)
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Abercrombie, M., James, D. W., and Newcombe, J. F. (1960). Wound contraction in rabbit skin, studied by splinting the wound margins. J. Anat 94, 170–182.[Medline]
Ahlfors, J. E., and Billiar, K. L. (2007). Biomechanical and biochemical characteristics of a human fibroblast-produced and remodeled matrix. Biomaterials 28, 2183–2191.[CrossRef][Medline]
Balaban, N. Q. et al. (2001). Force and focal adhesion assembly: a close relationship studied using elastic micropatterned substrates. Nat. Cell Biol 3, 466–472.[CrossRef][Medline]
Barocas, V. H., Moon, A. G., and Tranquillo, R. T. (1995). The fibroblast-populated collagen microsphere assay of cell traction force—Part 2, Measurement of the cell traction parameter. J. Biomech. Eng 117, 161–170.[Medline]
Beacham, D. A., and Cukierman, E. (2005). Stromagenesis: the changing face of fibroblastic microenvironments during tumor progression. Semin. Cancer Biol 15, 329–341.[CrossRef][Medline]
Bell, E., Ivarsson, B., and Merrill, C. (1979). Production of a tissue-like structure by contraction of collagen lattices by human fibroblasts of different proliferative potential in vitro. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 76, 1274–1278.
Beloussov, L. V., Louchinskaia, N. N., and Stein, A. A. (2000). Tension-dependent collective cell movements in the early gastrula ectoderm of Xenopus laevis embryos. Dev. Genes Evol 210, 92–104.[CrossRef][Medline]
Beningo, K. A., Dembo, M., Kaverina, I., Small, J. V., and Wang, Y. L. (2001). Nascent focal adhesions are responsible for the generation of strong propulsive forces in migrating fibroblasts. J. Cell Biol 153, 881–888.
Beningo, K. A., Dembo, M., and Wang, Y. L. (2004). Responses of fibroblasts to anchorage of dorsal extracellular matrix receptors. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 101, 18024–18029.
Billingham, R. E., and Russell, P. S. (1956). Studies on wound healing, with special reference to the phenomenon of contracture in experimental wounds in rabbits' skin. Ann. Surg 144, 961–981.[Medline]
Brown, R. A., Prajapati, R., McGrouther, D. A., Yannas, I. V., and Eastwood, M. (1998). Tensional homeostasis in dermal fibroblasts: mechanical responses to mechanical loading in three-dimensional substrates. J. Cell. Physiol 175, 323–332.[CrossRef][Medline]
Burridge, K., Fath, K., Kelly, T., Nuckolls, G., and Turner, C. (1988). Focal adhesions: transmembrane junctions between the extracellular matrix and the cytoskeleton. Annu. Rev. Cell Biol 4, 487–525.[CrossRef][Medline]
Cukierman, E., Pankov, R., and Yamada, K. M. (2002). Cell interactions with three-dimensional matrices. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol 14, 633–639.[CrossRef][Medline]
Desmouliere, A., Chaponnier, C., and Gabbiani, G. (2005). Tissue repair, contraction, and the myofibroblast. Wound Repair Regen 13, 7–12.[CrossRef][Medline]
Discher, D. E., Janmey, P., and Wang, Y. L. (2005). Tissue cells feel and respond to the stiffness of their substrate. Science 310, 1139–1143.
Eckes, B., Zigrino, P., Kessler, D., Holtkotter, O., Shephard, P., Mauch, C., and Krieg, T. (2000). Fibroblast-matrix interactions in wound healing and fibrosis. Matrix Biol 19, 325–332.[CrossRef][Medline]
Eichholtz, T., Jalink, K., Fahrenfort, I., and Moolenaar, W. H. (1993). The bioactive phospholipid lysophosphatidic acid is released from activated platelets. Biochem. J 291, (Pt 3), 677–680.[Medline]
Even-Ram, S., and Yamada, K. M. (2005). Cell migration in 3D matrix. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol 17, 524–532.[CrossRef][Medline]
Friedl, P. (2004). Prespecification and plasticity: shifting mechanisms of cell migration. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol 16, 14–23.[CrossRef][Medline]
Gaggioli, C., Hooper, S., Hidalgo-Carcedo, C., Grosse, R., Marshall, J. F., Harrington, K., and Sahai, E. (2007). Fibroblast-led collective invasion of carcinoma cells with differing roles for RhoGTPases in leading and following cells. Nat. Cell Biol 9, 1392–1400.[CrossRef][Medline]
Galbraith, C. G., and Sheetz, M. P. (1997). A micromachined device provides a new bend on fibroblast traction forces. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94, 9114–9118.
Galbraith, C. G., Yamada, K. M., and Sheetz, M. P. (2002). The relationship between force and focal complex development. J. Cell Biol 159, 695–705.
Gao, Z. et al. (2005). Deletion of the PDGFR-beta gene affects key fibroblast functions important for wound healing. J. Biol. Chem 280, 9375–9389.
Goldsmith, E. C., Hoffman, A., Morales, M. O., Potts, J. D., Price, R. L., McFadden, A., Rice, M., and Borg, T. K. (2004). Organization of fibroblasts in the heart. Dev. Dyn 230, 787–794.[CrossRef][Medline]
Grillo, H. C., Watts, G. T., and Gross, J. (1957). The marginal location of the contraction mechanism in open wounds. Amer. Coll. Surg. Surgical Forum 8, 586–589.
Grinnell, F. (2003). Fibroblast biology in three-dimensional collagen matrices. Trends Cell Biol 13, 264–269.[CrossRef][Medline]
Grinnell, F., Ho, C. H., Tamariz, E., Lee, D. J., and Skuta, G. (2003). Dendritic fibroblasts in three-dimensional collagen matrices. Mol. Biol. Cell 14, 384–395.
Grinnell, F., Rocha, L. B., Iucu, C., Rhee, S., and Jiang, H. (2006). Nested collagen matrices: a new model to study migration of human fibroblast populations in three dimensions. Exp. Cell Res 312, 86–94.[Medline]
Gross, J., Farinelli, W., Sadow, P., Anderson, R., and Bruns, R. (1995). On the mechanism of skin wound "contraction": a granulation tissue "knockout" with a normal phenotype. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 92, 5982–5986.
Harris, A. K. (1973). Cell surface movements related to cell locomotion. Ciba Found. Symp 14, 3–26.[Medline]
Ingber, D. E. (2006). Cellular mechanotransduction: putting all the pieces together again. FASEB J 20, 811–827.
Jiang, H., Rhee, S., Ho, C.-H., and Grinnell, F. (2008). Distinguishing fibroblast promigratory and procontractile growth factor environments in 3D collagen matrices. FASEB J (in press).
Johnson, T. M., Lowe, L., Brown, M. D., Sullivan, M. J., and Nelson, B. R. (1993). Histology and physiology of tissue expansion. J. Dermatol. Surg. Oncol 19, 1074–1078.[Medline]
Knock, G. A., Shaifta, Y., Snetkov, V. A., Vowles, B., Drndarski, S., Ward, J. P., and Aaronson, P. I. (2008). Interaction between src family kinases and rho-kinase in agonist-induced Ca2+-sensitization of rat pulmonary artery. Cardiovasc. Res 77, 570–579.
Kolega, J. (1986). Effects of mechanical tension on protrusive activity and microfilament and intermediate filament organization in an epidermal epithelium moving in culture. J. Cell Biol 102, 1400–1411.
Langevin, H. M., Cornbrooks, C. J., and Taatjes, D. J. (2004). Fibroblasts form a body-wide cellular network. Histochem. Cell Biol 122, 7–15.[Medline]
Lauffenburger, D. A., and Horwitz, A. F. (1996). Cell migration: a physically integrated molecular process. Cell 84, 359–369.[CrossRef][Medline]
Li, W., Fan, J., Chen, M., Guan, S., Sawcer, D., Bokoch, G. M., and Woodley, D. T. (2004). Mechanism of human dermal fibroblast migration driven by type I collagen and platelet-derived growth factor-BB. Mol. Biol. Cell 15, 294–309.
Lo, C. M., Wang, H. B., Dembo, M., and Wang, Y. L. (2000). Cell movement is guided by the rigidity of the substrate. Biophys. J 79, 144–152.
Mitchison, T. J., and Cramer, L. P. (1996). Actin-based cell motility and cell locomotion. Cell 84, 371–379.[CrossRef][Medline]
Newman, S. A., Frenz, D. A., Tomasek, J. J., and Rabuzzi, D. D. (1985). Matrix-driven translocation of cells and nonliving particles. Science 228, 885–889.
Peacock, E.E.J. (1984). Wound Repair, Philadelphia, PA: W. B. Saunders.
Petroll, W. M., Cavanagh, H. D., and Jester, J. V. (2004). Dynamic three-dimensional visualization of collagen matrix remodeling and cytoskeltal organization in living corneal fibroblasts. Scanning 26, 1–10.[Medline]
Raeber, G. P., Lutolf, M. P., and Hubbell, J. A. (2007). Part II: Fibroblasts preferentially migrate in the direction of principal strain. Biomech. Model Mechanobiol Epub ahead of print.
Rhee, S., and Grinnell, F. (2006). P21-activated kinase 1, convergence point in PDGF- and LPA-stimulated collagen matrix contraction by human fibroblasts. J. Cell Biol 172, 423–432.
Rhee, S., Jiang, H., Ho, C. H., and Grinnell, F. (2007). Microtubule function in fibroblast spreading is modulated according to the tension state of cell-matrix interactions. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 104, 5425–5430.
Ridley, A. J., Schwartz, M. A., Burridge, K., Firtel, R. A., Ginsberg, M. H., Borisy, G., Parsons, J. T., and Horwitz, A. R. (2003). Cell migration: integrating signals from front to back. Science 302, 1704–1709.
Riento, K., and Ridley, A. J. (2003). Rocks: multifunctional kinases in cell behaviour. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol 4, 446–456.[CrossRef][Medline]
Roeder, B. A., Kokini, K., Sturgis, J. E., Robinson, J. P., and Voytik-Harbin, S. L. (2002). Tensile mechanical properties of three-dimensional type I collagen extracellular matrices with varied microstructure. J. Biomech. Eng 124, 214–222.[CrossRef][Medline]
Roy, P., Petroll, W. M., Cavanagh, H. D., Chuong, C. J., and Jester, J. V. (1997). An in vitro force measurement assay to study the early mechanical interaction between corneal fibroblasts and collagen matrix. Exp. Cell Res 232, 106–117.[CrossRef][Medline]
Sahai, E., and Marshall, C. J. (2003). Differing modes of tumour cell invasion have distinct requirements for Rho/ROCK signalling and extracellular proteolysis. Nat. Cell Biol 5, 711–719.[CrossRef][Medline]
Sawhney, R. K., and Howard, J. (2002). Slow local movements of collagen fibers by fibroblasts drive the rapid global self-organization of collagen gels. J. Cell Biol 157, 1083–1091.
Shreiber, D. I., Barocas, V. H., and Tranquillo, R. T. (2003). Temporal variations in cell migration and traction during fibroblast-mediated gel compaction. Biophys. J 84, 4102–4114.
Silver, F. H., Siperko, L. M., and Seehra, G. P. (2002). Mechanobiology of force transduction in dermal tissue. Skin Res. Technol 8, 1–21.[Medline]
Singer, I. I., Kawka, D. W., Kazazis, D. M., and Clark, R. A. (1984). In vivo co-distribution of fibronectin and actin fibers in granulation tissue: immunofluorescence and electron microscope studies of the fibronexus at the myofibroblast surface. J. Cell Biol 98, 2091–2106.
Stopak, D., and Harris, A. K. (1982). Connective tissue morphogenesis by fibroblast traction. I. Tissue culture observations. Dev. Biol 90, 383–398.[CrossRef][Medline]
Tamariz, E., and Grinnell, F. (2002). Modulation of fibroblast morphology and adhesion during collagen matrix remodeling. Mol. Biol. Cell 13, 3915–3929.
Tomasek, J. J., Gabbiani, G., Hinz, B., Chaponnier, C., and Brown, R. A. (2002). Myofibroblasts and mechano-regulation of connective tissue remodelling. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol 3, 349–363.[CrossRef][Medline]
Tonnesen, M. G., Feng, X., and Clark, R. A. (2000). Angiogenesis in wound healing. J. Investig. Dermatol. Symp. Proc 5, 40–46.[CrossRef][Medline]
Totsukawa, G., Wu, Y., Sasaki, Y., Hartshorne, D. J., Yamakita, Y., Yamashiro, S., and Matsumura, F. (2004). Distinct roles of MLCK and ROCK in the regulation of membrane protrusions and focal adhesion dynamics during cell migration of fibroblasts. J. Cell Biol 164, 427–439.
Tranquillo, R. T. (1999). Self-organization of tissue-equivalents: the nature and role of contact guidance. Biochem. Soc. Symp 65, 27–42.[Medline]
Tucker, R. P., Edwards, B. F., and Erickson, C. A. (1985). Tension in the culture dish: microfilament organization and migratory behavior of quail neural crest cells. Cell Motil 5, 225–237.[CrossRef][Medline]
Varani, J., Schuger, L., Dame, M. K., Leonard, C., Fligiel, S. E., Kang, S., Fisher, G. J., and Voorhees, J. J. (2004). Reduced fibroblast interaction with intact collagen as a mechanism for depressed collagen synthesis in photodamaged skin. J. Invest. Dermatol 122, 1471–1479.[CrossRef][Medline]
Vogel, V., and Sheetz, M. P. (2006). Local force and geometry sensing regulate cell functions. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol 7, 265–275.[CrossRef][Medline]
Wakatsuki, T., Kolodney, M. S., Zahalak, G. I., and Elson, E. L. (2000). Cell mechanics studied by a reconstituted model tissue. Biophys. J 79, 2353–2368.
Wang, H. B., Dembo, M., Hanks, S. K., and Wang, Y. (2001). Focal adhesion kinase is involved in mechanosensing during fibroblast migration. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98, 11295–11300.
Wiig, H., Rubin, K., and Reed, R. K. (2003). New and active role of the interstitium in control of interstitial fluid pressure: potential therapeutic consequences. Acta Anaesthesiol. Scand 47, 111–121.[CrossRef][Medline]
Wilhelmi, B. J., Blackwell, S. J., Mancoll, J. S., and Phillips, L. G. (1998). Creep vs. stretch: a review of the viscoelastic properties of skin. Ann. Plast. Surg 41, 215–219.[CrossRef][Medline]
Wolf, K., Wu, Y. I., Liu, Y., Geiger, J., Tam, E., Overall, C., Stack, M. S., and Friedl, P. (2007). Multi-step pericellular proteolysis controls the transition from individual to collective cancer cell invasion. Nat. Cell Biol 9, 893–904.[CrossRef][Medline]
Wozniak, M. A., Desai, R., Solski, P. A., Der, C. J., and Keely, P. J. (2003). ROCK-generated contractility regulates breast epithelial cell differentiation in response to the physical properties of a three-dimensional collagen matrix. J. Cell Biol 163, 583–595.
Yamada, K. M., and Cukierman, E. (2007). Modeling tissue morphogenesis and cancer in 3D. Cell 130, 601–610.[CrossRef][Medline]
Yatomi, Y., Igarashi, Y., Yang, L., Hisano, N., Qi, R., Asazuma, N., Satoh, K., Ozaki, Y., and Kume, S. (1997). Sphingosine 1-phosphate, a bioactive sphingolipid abundantly stored in platelets, is a normal constituent of human plasma and serum. J. Biochem 121, 969–973.
Zaman, M. H., Trapani, L. M., Siemeski, A., MacKellar, D., Gong, H., Kamm, R. D., Wells, A., Lauffenburger, D. A., and Matsudaira, P. (2006). Migration of tumor cells in 3D matrices is governed by matrix stiffness along with cell-matrix adhesion and proteolysis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 103, 10889–10894.
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||