Molecular Biology of the Cell track citations

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Originally published as MBC in Press, 10.1091/mbc.E07-09-0930 on March 5, 2008

Vol. 19, Issue 5, 2051-2058, May 2008

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplmental Materials
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
E07-09-0930v1
19/5/2051    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Miron-Mendoza, M.
Right arrow Articles by Grinnell, F.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Miron-Mendoza, M.
Right arrow Articles by Grinnell, F.

Collagen Fibril Flow and Tissue Translocation Coupled to Fibroblast Migration in 3D Collagen Matrices

Miguel Miron-Mendoza, Joachim Seemann, and Frederick Grinnell

Department of Cell Biology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75390-9039

Submitted September 18, 2007; Revised February 6, 2008; Accepted February 19, 2008
Monitoring Editor: Yu-Li Wang


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
In nested collagen matrices, human fibroblasts migrate from cell-containing dermal equivalents into surrounding cell-free outer matrices. Time-lapse microscopy showed that in addition to cell migration, collagen fibril flow occurred in the outer matrix toward the interface with the dermal equivalent. Features of this flow suggested that it depends on the same cell motile machinery that normally results in cell migration. Collagen fibril flow was capable of producing large-scale tissue translocation as shown by closure of a ~1-mm gap between paired dermal equivalents in floating, nested collagen matrices. Our findings demonstrate that when fibroblasts interact with collagen matrices, tractional force exerted by the cells can couple to matrix translocation as well as to cell migration.


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Cell migration depends on the multistep process of cell extension, adhesion, exertion of backward tractional force, and tail retraction (Lauffenburger and Horwitz, 1996Go; Mitchison and Cramer, 1996Go; Galbraith and Sheetz, 1997Go; Beningo et al., 2001Go; Ridley et al., 2003Go). The extensive body of research underlying the multistep model is based on studies with tissue cells on extracellular matrix (ECM)-coated planar surfaces including rigid materials such as glass or plastic coverslips as well as flexible materials such as polyacrylamide. On ECM-coated planar surfaces, cells can modulate their cytoskeletal function and adhesion strength in response to surface mechanics (Balaban et al., 2001Go; Discher et al., 2005Go; Ingber, 2006Go; Vogel and Sheetz, 2006Go). However, adsorbed or covalently attached ECM molecules tend to be held in register with each other with little capacity to undergo cell-mediated mechanical and molecular reorganization.

Type 1 collagen is the major protein component of fibrous connective tissues. These connective tissues provide mechanical support and frameworks throughout the body, and fibroblasts are the cell type primarily responsible for their biosynthesis and remodeling. Three-dimensional (3D) matrices prepared with type I collagen exhibit mechanical properties that resemble connective tissue (Barocas et al., 1995Go; Wakatsuki et al., 2000Go; Roeder et al., 2002Go; Silver et al., 2002Go; Ahlfors and Billiar, 2007Go). Unlike ECM-coated material surfaces, fibroblasts can mechanically remodel collagen matrices both locally and globally (Brown et al., 1998Go; Tomasek et al., 2002Go; Grinnell, 2003Go; Petroll, 2004Go; Tranquillo, 1999Go. Such mechanical remodeling of connective tissue ECM is believed to be important for tissue homeostasis (Silver et al., 2002Go; Wiig et al., 2003Go; Goldsmith et al., 2004Go; Langevin et al., 2004Go), aging (Varani et al., 2004Go), repair (Tonnesen et al., 2000Go; Tomasek et al., 2002Go; Grinnell, 2003Go), fibrosis (Eckes et al., 2000Go; Desmouliere et al., 2005Go), and tumorigenesis (Beacham and Cukierman, 2005Go; Gaggioli et al., 2007Go; Yamada and Cukierman, 2007Go).

Cells interacting with 3D collagen matrices exhibit distinct patterns of cell signaling (Cukierman et al., 2002Go; Wozniak et al., 2003Go; Beningo et al., 2004Go; Rhee et al., 2007Go) and increased plasticity of cell migration (Sahai and Marshall, 2003Go; Shreiber et al., 2003Go; Friedl, 2004Go; Even-Ram and Yamada, 2005Go; Zaman et al., 2006Go; Wolf et al., 2007Go). We have been studying human foreskin fibroblast migration in nested collagen matrices (Grinnell et al., 2006Go). To prepare nested matrices, contracted collagen matrices known as dermal equivalents (Bell et al., 1979Go) are polymerized within cell-free outer matrices. Cells can migrate from the dermal equivalents into the outer matrices. Platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF) is unique among growth factors in its capacity to promote human fibroblast migration in nested collagen matrices, whereas sphingosine-1-phosphate acts as an inhibitor of migration (Jiang et al., 2008Go).

Time-lapse microscopic observations of fibroblasts migrating in nested collagen matrices showed that in addition to cell migration, collagen fibril flow occurred in the outer matrix toward the dermal equivalent boundary. Features of this flow suggested that it depends on the same cell motile machinery normally used by cells for migration. Collagen fibril flow was capable of producing large-scale tissue translocation as shown by closure of a ~1-mm gap between paired dermal equivalents in floating, nested collagen matrices. Our findings demonstrate that tractional force exerted by fibroblasts in collagen matrices can couple differentially to cell migration or matrix translocation.


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Materials
Type I collagen (3 mg/ml, Vitrogen) was purchased from Cohesion (Palo Alto, CA). DMEM, CO2-independent DMEM, and 0.25% trypsin/EDTA solution were purchased from Invitrogen (Gaithersburg, MD). Fetal bovine serum (FBS) was purchased from Gemini (Woodland, CA). Rho kinase inhibitor Y-27632 was obtained from Calbiochem-Novabiochem (La Jolla, CA). Blebbistatin was obtained from Toronto Research Chemicals (Toronto, Canada). PDGF BB isotype was obtained from Upstate Biotechnology (Lake Placid, NY). Fatty acid–free bovine serum albumin (BSA), lysophosphatidic acid (LPA), and cytochalasin D were obtained from Sigma (St. Louis, MO). Alexa Fluor 594 phalloidin and propidium iodide (PI) were obtained from Molecular Probes (Eugene, OR). RNase (DNase free) was purchased from Roche (Indianapolis, IN). Polystyrene beads, 3 µm, and 6-µm Fluoresbrite YG microspheres were obtained from Polysciences (Warrington, PA). Fluoromount G was obtained from Southern Biotechnology Associates (Birmingham, AL).

Cell Culture and Preparation of Nested Collagen Matrices
Early passage human foreskin fibroblasts (hTERT-immortalized; Rhee et al., 2007Go) were cultured in DMEM supplemented with 10% FBS at 37°C in a 5% CO2 humidified incubator. Cell migration in nested collagen matrices was performed as described previously (Figure 1A; Grinnell et al., 2006Go). Briefly, dermal equivalents were formed by contraction for 6–48 h of 200-µl collagen matrices (1.5 mg/ml collagen, 2 x 105 cells/matrix). Subsequently, dermal equivalents were embedded in 200 µl outer collagen matrices containing 1.5 mg/ml collagen (Figure 1B). Nested matrices were incubated in DMEM (or CO2-independent DMEM for time-lapse studies) containing 5 mg/ml BSA and 50 ng/ml PDGF or other growth factors as indicated.


Figure 1
View larger version (81K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 1. Cell migration in nested matrices. (A) Diagram of nested collagen matrices. (B) Scanned image of a nested collagen matrix showing dermal equivalent (dense inner region) surrounded by an outer collagen matrix (more translucent region). (C) Representative images from the times indicated in a time-lapse microscopic video of nested collagen matrices (6-h dermal equivalent) focused at the interface between the dermal equivalent (darker region) and surrounding collagen matrix (lighter region). Bar, 130 µm.

 
To obtain floating nested matrices, restrained samples were released gently from the bottom of the culture surface using a spatula. For time-lapse imaging, gross movement of the floating matrices was minimized using a plastic washer (~14-mm inner diameter). Paired nested matrices contained two dermal equivalents that were placed ~1 mm apart on a 60-µl cushion of outer matrix and then covered with the remaining 140 µl of outer matrix collagen solution. Overall appearance of nested collagen matrices was recorded using an Epson 4870 photo scanner (Epson America, Long Beach, CA).

Time-Lapse Microscopy
Nested collagen matrices in 24-well culture dishes were placed in an environmental chamber at 37°C, and time-lapse microscopy was carried out using a Zeiss Axiovert 200M inverted microscope equipped with an A-PLAN 10x/0.25 PH1 Zeiss objective (Carl Zeiss MicroImaging, Thornwood, NY) and a Hamamatsu model Orca 285 CCD camera (Hamamatsu, Bridgewater, NJ). Z stack images were acquired at 20-µm steps and 5–10-min intervals using Openlab 4.02 (Improvision, Lexington, MA) software. The Z stack range was 800 µm to ensure complete coverage of the range of cell movement, which typically occurred within 100–200 µm. Each Z plane was reconstructed into a single 2D video. For quantitative analysis of cell migration and collagen translocation, the image field was calibrated with a micrometer slide, and Openlab software was used to measure displacements. In some experiments, reorganization of the collagen matrix was analyzed by visualizing the distribution of 3- or 6-µm beads embedded in the matrix. In initial experiments, we used beads coated with BSA. In later experiments, we added beads directly as supplied by the manufacturer, which was simpler because a sonication step was not required, and no differences were observed compared with albumin-coated beads.

Immunofluorescence Microscopy
Preparation of samples for actin staining with Alexa Fluor 594–conjugated phalloidin and PI was carried out as previously described (Grinnell et al., 2006Go). Images of PI-stained cells used for quantification of cell migration were collected with a Nikon Elipse 400 fluorescence microscope (Melville, NY) and 10x/0.45 Nikon Plan Apo infinity corrected objective using a Photometrics SenSys CCD camera (Tucson, AZ) and MetaVue acquisition and imaging software (Molecular Devices, Menlo Park, CA). The cell migration index was calculated by counting the average number of cells that had migrated out of dermal equivalents in four 10x microscopic fields selected arbitrarily. Each field included the border of the dermal equivalent (detected by dark field microscopy) and the furthest moving cells (detected by nuclear staining with PI).


    RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Fibroblast Migration in Nested Collagen Matrices
Figure 1A diagrams the nested collagen matrix model of cell migration in which dermal equivalents—fibroblast-contracted floating collagen matrices—are embedded in cell-free, outer collagen matrices. Figure 1B presents the typical appearance viewed from above of a nested collagen matrix with the dermal equivalent (dense inner region) surrounded by an outer matrix (more translucent region). Figure 1C shows time-lapse phase-contrast images focused at the interface between dermal equivalent (darker area) and outer matrix (lighter area). As described previously, a wave of fibroblast migration across the interface typically began after several hours (Grinnell et al., 2006Go). Migrating cells all were localized within the outer collagen matrix. No direct interaction occurred between migrating cells and the underlying culture dish on which nested collagen matrices were restrained.

Collagen Translocation in Nested Collagen Matrices
Figure 2A presents representative, phase-contrast images from a video (Sup_1.mov) in which individual cells can be seen migrating from the dermal equivalent into the outer matrix. Migrating cells typically had leading dendritic extensions that were branched. Some of these extensions increased in size and became stabilized during migration; others regressed. In addition to cell migration, collagen translocation occurred in the outer matrix toward the dermal equivalent interface. Collagen movement can be appreciated by noting the position of matrix deformations (Figure 2A, asterisks). In the video, collagen translocation has the appearance of collagen fibril flow.


Figure 2
View larger version (94K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 2. Cell migration and collagen translocation in nested matrices. (A) Representative images of the times indicated from a time-lapse microscopic video (Sup_1.mov) of nested collagen matrices (6-h dermal equivalent) showing individual cells migrating from the dermal equivalent into the outer matrix. Collagen translocation can be appreciated by noting the position of matrix deformations (labeled by asterisks) that move toward the interface with the dermal equivalent. Bar, 25 µm. (B) Comparison of collagen translocation and cell migration. Average ± SD of three separate movies showing changing velocities (displacement measured during 1-h intervals) of collagen translocation (circles) and cell migration (squares). For each movie, velocities were determined by measuring 3 points at the interface, 10 points in the outer matrix, and the tail ends of six cells. When cells first appeared in the outer matrix, the distance measured was from the cells' tail ends to the interface. Data were corrected for movements of the interface.

 
Collagen translocation in the outer matrix toward the dermal equivalent occurred earlier than fibroblast migration. Figure 2B shows this relationship quantitatively by measuring cell migration and collagen translocation during 1-h intervals averaged from three separate videos. The data demonstrate that the velocity of collagen translocation peaked before cell migration began. Once cells begin to emerge from the inner matrix, the velocity of collagen translocation declined.

The decrease in velocity of collagen translocation might have been a feature of the experimental system independent of the time when cell migration began. To test this possibility, studies were carried out using nested collagen matrices prepared with dermal equivalents that had been contracted for 48 h. With 48-h dermal equivalents, a longer lag phase precedes cell migration compared with the 6-h dermal equivalents used for the experiments described in Figures 1 and 2. Figure 3A shows representative images from the beginning and end of a time-lapse video (Sup_2.mov). During the 15-h incubation, little cell migration across the interface occurred. As can be seen in the video, collagen flow took place during this period. Polystyrene beads (3µm) in the collagen help visualize collagen flow. Quantitative measurements (Figure 3B) demonstrate that collagen translocation in the absence of cell migration reached a higher velocity than observed in Figure 2 and declined later.


Figure 3
View larger version (82K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 3. Collagen translocation in nested matrices. (A) Representative images from the beginning and end of a time-lapse video (Sup_2.mov) in which nested collagen matrices were prepared with 48-h contracted dermal equivalents containing 3-µm polystyrene beads (diluted 1:1000) in the outer matrix to help visualize collagen matrix flow. (B) Collagen movement in the outer matrix toward the dermal equivalent was quantified by measuring the displacements (average ± SD) of 10 different beads (arbitrarily selected) at 1-h intervals. Data were corrected for movements of the interface. Bar, 130 µm.

 
Collagen Flow Depends on Actin, Myosin, and Rho Kinase
Studies were carried out to learn more about the cellular mechanisms responsible for collagen flow. Movement of collagen was actin-dependent because addition of cytochalasin D (5 µM) after 7 h completely inhibited further cell or collagen translocation (Sup_3.mov.). We also compared the effects of pharmacologic inhibitors of myosin II and Rho kinase on collagen translocation under conditions previously shown to inhibit fibroblast migration in nested collagen matrices (Grinnell et al., 2006Go). Figure 4 shows that blebbistatin, which blocks myosin II activity, completely prevented both cell migration and collagen translocation. Y27632, which blocks Rho kinase activity, partially inhibited cell migration and collagen translocation. These findings were consistent with the idea that cells use the same motile machinery for collagen translocation as for cell migration.


Figure 4
View larger version (45K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 4. Myosin II and Rho kinase dependence of cell migration and collagen translocation. (A) Nested collagen matrices were prepared with 22-h contracted dermal equivalents and incubated 20 h in medium containing PDGF plus 10 µM Rho kinase inhibitor Y-27632 or 20 µM myosin II inhibitor blebbistatin as indicated. Subsequently cells were fixed and stained with PI. Bar, 100 µm. (B) Cell migration index values shown are the averages ± SD of duplicate samples from two separate experiments. (C) Average ± SD of two separate movies showing changing velocities (displacement measured during 1-h intervals) of collagen translocation. For each movie, velocities were determined by measuring 10 points in the outer matrix and 3 points at the interface. Data were corrected for movements of the interface.

 
Cell Migration in Restrained Versus Floating Nested Collagen Matrices
The observations described in Figures 1GoGo4 all were made using nested collagen matrices restrained on culture dish surfaces. We and others have shown that fibroblast physiology and morphology differ markedly when fibroblasts interact with collagen matrices floating in culture medium versus restrained on culture dishes (Grinnell, 2003Go). Therefore, we compared cell migration with nested collagen matrices that were restrained on culture dishes or floating in culture medium. Figure 5A shows fluorescence images of samples stained by PI, and Figure 5B presents quantification of the results. If nested collagen matrices were floating in medium, then the cell migration index was reduced markedly compared with restrained conditions.


Figure 5
View larger version (42K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 5. Cell migration in floating versus restrained nested matrices. (A) Nested collagen matrices (24-h dermal equivalent) were incubated 24 h, after which cells were stained with PI. Bar, 100 µm. (B) Cell migration index values shown are the averages ± SD of duplicate samples from three separate experiments.

 
Additional experiments were carried out with restrained and floating nested collagen matrices that contained paired dermal equivalents embedded ~1 mm apart in outer matrices. Figure 6A shows the experimental design and presents immunofluorescence images taken at the edge and gap regions of the paired matrices after culture for 24 h. Figure 6B shows quantification of the findings. With restrained, paired nested matrices, cell migration occurred to a similar extent around the edges of the dermal equivalents and in the gap between. With floating, paired nested matrices, migration was limited almost entirely to the gap region in between. Taken together, the findings in Figures 5 and 6 suggested that fibroblast migration in collagen matrices depended on the ability of the matrix to resist tractional force exerted by the cells. Resistance could be provided by restraint of nested matrices on culture surfaces or by the opposition between paired dermal equivalents if the nested matrices were floating in culture medium.


Figure 6
View larger version (63K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 6. Cell migration in floating and restrained, paired nested collagen matrices. (A) Paired nested collagen matrices prepared with 19-h dermal equivalents were incubated 35 h in medium containing 50 ng/ml PDGF either restrained on culture dishes or floating in medium as indicated. At the end of the incubations, cells were fixed and stained with PI to visualize cell nuclei. (B) Cell migration index values shown for different regions (edge vs. gap) are the averages ± SD of two separate experiments and seven microscopic fields per sample. Bar, 60 µm.

 
Collagen Matrix Reorganization and Tissue Translocation
Even though there was little cell migration in floating compared with restrained nested matrices, extensive collagen reorganization occurred under floating conditions. Figure 7A shows fluorescence images of nested matrices in which the outer matrix contained 6-µm fluorescent beads. Immediately after nested matrices were prepared (0 h), beads were distributed uniformly throughout the outer matrix. After 24 h, cell migration was observed in restrained nested matrices, but little bead accumulation at the dermal equivalent interface could be detected. Conversely, in the case of floating nested matrices, little cell migration was observed, but beads accumulated along the interface between the dermal equivalent and outer matrix. Particle counts made using NIH Image J software (http://rsb.info.nih.gov/ij/) on several fields from duplicate matrices showed that compared with newly prepared nested collagen matrices, bead density across the interface increased slightly more than twofold in 24-h restrained nested matrices and more than 10-fold in 24-h floating nested matrices.


Figure 7
View larger version (132K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 7. Collagen matrix reorganization in floating nested matrices. Nested collagen matrices were prepared with 6-µm fluorescent microspheres in the outer matrix (1:200) and incubated 24 h either restrained on culture dishes or floating in culture medium as indicated. At the end of the incubations, cells were fixed and stained with Alexa Fluor 594 phalloidin. Images were collected by focusing first on actin staining of cells at the interface or in the outer matrix and then switching to fluorescent beads without changing the focus. Immediately after nested matrices were polymerized (0 h), beads were distributed uniformly throughout the outer matrix. After 24 h, cell migration was observed with restrained nested matrices, but no bead accumulation at the dermal equivalent interface. In floating nested matrices, no cell migration was observed, but bead accumulation occurred at the interface. Bar, 100 µm.

 
We also tested the consequences of collagen reorganization using floating, paired nested matrices. Figure 8, A and B, shows representative images from the times indicated in time-lapse microscopic videos of experiments with 19-h dermal equivalents (Sup_4.mov) and 48-h dermal equivalents (Sup_5.mov). Figure 8A shows that cell migration occurred in the gap between the 19-h dermal equivalents, tension lines formed, and some gap closure took place. Figure 8B shows that with paired nested collagen matrices containing 48-h dermal equivalents, little cell migration occurred but gap closure was complete. These finding indicated that collagen translocation in the nested matrices could result in large-scale tissue movement.


Figure 8
View larger version (106K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 8. Gap closure with paired nested collagen matrices. (A) Representative images from the times indicated in a time-lapse microscopic video (Sup_4.mov) of floating, paired nested collagen matrices (19-h dermal equivalent). During 35 h, development of tension lines, cell migration into the gap region, and gap closure were observed. (B) Representative images from the times indicated in a time-lapse microscopic video (Sup_5.mov) of floating, paired nested collagen matrices (48-h dermal equivalents). During 45 h, little cell migration into the gap region occurred but the gap between dermal equivalents closed completely. Bar, 130 µm. (C) Scanned images of paired nested collagen matrices (dermal equivalents contracted for 24 h) that were incubated in medium containing 50 ng/ml PDGF, 10 µM LPA, 10% FBS, or no added growth factor (BSA), and under restrained and floating conditions as indicated. Gap closure occurred only under floating conditions with PDGF-containing medium. Bar, 3 mm.

 
For human fibroblasts interacting with collagen matrices, PDGF acts as a promigratory growth factor, whereas LPA and FBS are procontractile and show little stimulation of migration (Grinnell et al., 2006Go). Additional experiments were carried out to compare the effects of these agonists on gap closure with paired, nested collagen matrices. Figure 8C shows that neither LPA- nor FBS-stimulated gap closure. Also, no gap closure occurred if paired, nested matrices were restrained.


    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Fibroblasts and other cells can remodel collagen matrices mechanically. Remodeling has been demonstrated at a global level by measuring collagen matrix contraction (Cukierman et al., 2002Go; Grinnell, 2003Go). Remodeling also has been studied by observing local changes in collagen organization in response to cell motile activity (Roy et al., 1997Go; Tamariz and Grinnell, 2002Go) and cell migration (Gaggioli et al., 2007Go; Wolf et al., 2007Go). In addition, if fibroblast explants are embedded in collagen matrices, then collagen fibrils in between the explants become aligned into linear tracks (Stopak and Harris, 1982Go; Sawhney and Howard, 2002Go). In the current article, we describe another aspect of mechanically remodeling of collagen matrices: collagen fibril flow and large-scale tissue translocation. In the case of floating nested matrices, collagen fibril flow was sufficient to permit closure of a 1-mm gap between paired dermal equivalents.

Under some circumstances, collagen flow has been reported to occur within collagen matrices independent from tissue cells (Newman et al., 1985Go). The collagen flow we detected in the current studies required fibroblasts and appeared to utilize the same cell motile machinery involved in cell migration. Interfering with actin or inhibiting myosin II or Rho kinase inhibited cell migration and collagen translocation. In addition, the growth factor specificity of collagen flow was similar to cell migration. Gap closure in floating, paired nested matrices took place in the presence of PDGF but not LPA or FBS. Previously, we showed that PDGF but not LPA or FBS stimulates human fibroblast migration in nested collagen matrices (Grinnell et al., 2006Go). Serum frequently has been used as an agonist to study cell migration, and PDGF is believed to be the major promigratory factor for fibroblasts in serum (Li et al., 2004Go; Gao et al., 2005Go). However, serum also contains the lipid growth factor sphingosine-1-phosphate (Eichholtz et al., 1993Go; Yatomi et al., 1997Go). S1P recently was shown to be a potent inhibitor of human fibroblast migration in collagen matrices and to reduce the promigratory activity of serum (Jiang et al., 2008Go).

Evidence regarding the regulatory role that Rho kinase plays in cell migration is complex. Blocking Rho kinase activity can inhibit or stimulate cell migration depending on cell type and experimental conditions (Riento and Ridley, 2003Go; Totsukawa et al., 2004Go). Besides for collagen fibril flow and cell migration, Rho kinase activity also is required for PDGF-stimulated fibroblast-collagen matrix contraction (Rhee and Grinnell, 2006Go). Human fibroblasts in collagen lack detectable Rho activation upon PDGF stimulation (Grinnell et al., 2003Go). Therefore, basal rather than agonist-stimulated Rho kinase probably is required for cell migration and contraction, perhaps by maintaining basal levels of myosin light chain phosphorylation (Abe et al., 2003Go; Knock et al., 2008Go).

Collagen fibril flow not only appeared to depend on the same cell motile machinery as cell migration, but also tended to occur reciprocally with migration. That is, collagen translocation was greatest before cells began to migrate in the outer matrices. Using more contracted dermal equivalents to extend the period before cell migration begins increased the period of collagen flow. Why collagen flow eventually decreased under the latter conditions even in the absence of cell migration remains to be determined. In the case of floating nested matrices, we observed decreased cell migration and increased collagen flow. Collagen flow in paired nested collagen matrices resulted in dermal equivalent gap closure if the matrices were floating.

Why there is a lag phase before cell migration begins, and why the length of the lag phase increases along with the time of dermal equivalent contraction are questions yet to be resolved. One possibility is that during the lag phase, changes occur in the cells or matrix required for fibroblasts to move from across the interface between the dermal equivalent whose collagen density can be as high as ~25 mg/ml collagen (Ahlfors and Billiar, 2007Go) into the outer collagen matrix composed of 1.5 mg/ml collagen. On collagen-coated planar surfaces, cells tend not to move from stiffer to softer materials (Lo et al., 2000Go). Whatever the final explanation, we believe that the studies with restrained compared to floating nested matrices indicate an important role for tension. Fibroblasts in floating collagen matrices have fewer stress fibers and focal adhesions than cells in restrained matrices (Grinnell, 2003Go). Based on the finding that cellular stress fibers and focal adhesions are indicators of cell tension (Singer et al., 1984Go; Burridge et al., 1988Go; Balaban et al., 2001Go; Galbraith et al., 2002Go), fibroblasts are less able to develop tension in floating compared with restrained matrices. Given that tension plays a positive role in cell migration on planar surfaces (Tucker et al., 1985Go; Kolega, 1986Go; Beloussov et al., 2000Go; Lo et al., 2000Go; Wang et al., 2001Go; Raeber et al., 2007Go), the decreased ability of cells in floating nested collagen matrices to develop tension (unless the dermal equivalents are paired) provides a reasonable explanation for the lack of migration.

Figure 9 offers what we believe to be an attractive hypothesis to account for our overall observations. If the collagen matrix can resist cellular tractional force, then the cells can move. If the matrix cannot resist cellular traction force, then the matrix moves. Likewise, when tissue cells attempt to spread on a silicone oil surface, if the viscosity of the oil is not sufficient to resist the pull of cell extensions, then the oil flows and the cells remain round (Harris, 1973Go).


Figure 9
View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 9. Cell traction, migration, and collagen translocation. If the collagen matrix can resist cellular tractional force, then the cells can move. If the matrix cannot resist cellular traction force, then the matrix moves. See text for additional details.

 
Finally, our finding of large-scale tissue translocation in paired nested collagen matrices has important implications for connective tissue physiology. In nested matrices, the force is generated inward between dermal equivalents. In tissues, the force would be generated radially from sites where cells are stimulated to migrate. Research on tissue repair in animal models demonstrated more than 50 years ago that closure of full-thickness wounds occurs by large-scale translocation of dermal connective tissue (Billingham and Russell, 1956Go). Two different mechanisms for mechanical force generation were implicated. Based on studies with splinted wounds, cellular force was believed to be generated from within the granulation tissue (Abercrombie et al., 1960Go), which now is known to represent myofibroblast contraction (Tomasek et al., 2002Go). Other studies showed that removal of granulation tissue did not decrease the rate of wound closure (Grillo et al., 1957Go; Gross et al., 1995Go), and fibroblasts migrating at the wound margins were suggested to provide the mechanical force for closure albeit by an unknown mechanism. We suggest that tractional forces exerted by fibroblasts attempting to migrate at the wound edge could cause inward movement of the connective tissue matrix, depending on potential mobilization of the surrounding tissue (cf. Peacock, 1984Go), a cell-dependent version of what surgeons call "mechanical creep" (Johnson et al., 1993Go; Wilhelmi et al., 1998Go).


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
We are indebted to Drs. William Snell, Matt Petroll, and Kate Luby-Phelps for their helpful advice. This research was supported by Grants GM31321 from the National Institutes of Health to F.G. and a grant from the UT Southwestern Endowed Scholars Program to J.S.


    Footnotes
 
This was published online ahead of print in MBC in Press (http://www.molbiolcell.org/cgi/doi/10.1091/mbc.E07-09-0930) on March 5, 2008.

Address correspondence to: Frederick Grinnell (frederick.grinnell{at}utsouthwestern.edu)


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Abe, M., Ho, C. H., Kamm, K. E., and Grinnell, F. (2003). Different molecular motors mediate platelet-derived growth factor and lysophosphatidic acid-stimulated floating collagen matrix contraction. J. Biol. Chem 278, 47707–47712.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Abercrombie, M., James, D. W., and Newcombe, J. F. (1960). Wound contraction in rabbit skin, studied by splinting the wound margins. J. Anat 94, 170–182.[Medline]

Ahlfors, J. E., and Billiar, K. L. (2007). Biomechanical and biochemical characteristics of a human fibroblast-produced and remodeled matrix. Biomaterials 28, 2183–2191.[CrossRef][Medline]

Balaban, N. Q. et al. (2001). Force and focal adhesion assembly: a close relationship studied using elastic micropatterned substrates. Nat. Cell Biol 3, 466–472.[CrossRef][Medline]

Barocas, V. H., Moon, A. G., and Tranquillo, R. T. (1995). The fibroblast-populated collagen microsphere assay of cell traction force—Part 2, Measurement of the cell traction parameter. J. Biomech. Eng 117, 161–170.[Medline]

Beacham, D. A., and Cukierman, E. (2005). Stromagenesis: the changing face of fibroblastic microenvironments during tumor progression. Semin. Cancer Biol 15, 329–341.[CrossRef][Medline]

Bell, E., Ivarsson, B., and Merrill, C. (1979). Production of a tissue-like structure by contraction of collagen lattices by human fibroblasts of different proliferative potential in vitro. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 76, 1274–1278.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Beloussov, L. V., Louchinskaia, N. N., and Stein, A. A. (2000). Tension-dependent collective cell movements in the early gastrula ectoderm of Xenopus laevis embryos. Dev. Genes Evol 210, 92–104.[CrossRef][Medline]

Beningo, K. A., Dembo, M., Kaverina, I., Small, J. V., and Wang, Y. L. (2001). Nascent focal adhesions are responsible for the generation of strong propulsive forces in migrating fibroblasts. J. Cell Biol 153, 881–888.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Beningo, K. A., Dembo, M., and Wang, Y. L. (2004). Responses of fibroblasts to anchorage of dorsal extracellular matrix receptors. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 101, 18024–18029.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Billingham, R. E., and Russell, P. S. (1956). Studies on wound healing, with special reference to the phenomenon of contracture in experimental wounds in rabbits' skin. Ann. Surg 144, 961–981.[Medline]

Brown, R. A., Prajapati, R., McGrouther, D. A., Yannas, I. V., and Eastwood, M. (1998). Tensional homeostasis in dermal fibroblasts: mechanical responses to mechanical loading in three-dimensional substrates. J. Cell. Physiol 175, 323–332.[CrossRef][Medline]

Burridge, K., Fath, K., Kelly, T., Nuckolls, G., and Turner, C. (1988). Focal adhesions: transmembrane junctions between the extracellular matrix and the cytoskeleton. Annu. Rev. Cell Biol 4, 487–525.[CrossRef][Medline]

Cukierman, E., Pankov, R., and Yamada, K. M. (2002). Cell interactions with three-dimensional matrices. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol 14, 633–639.[CrossRef][Medline]

Desmouliere, A., Chaponnier, C., and Gabbiani, G. (2005). Tissue repair, contraction, and the myofibroblast. Wound Repair Regen 13, 7–12.[CrossRef][Medline]

Discher, D. E., Janmey, P., and Wang, Y. L. (2005). Tissue cells feel and respond to the stiffness of their substrate. Science 310, 1139–1143.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Eckes, B., Zigrino, P., Kessler, D., Holtkotter, O., Shephard, P., Mauch, C., and Krieg, T. (2000). Fibroblast-matrix interactions in wound healing and fibrosis. Matrix Biol 19, 325–332.[CrossRef][Medline]

Eichholtz, T., Jalink, K., Fahrenfort, I., and Moolenaar, W. H. (1993). The bioactive phospholipid lysophosphatidic acid is released from activated platelets. Biochem. J 291, (Pt 3), 677–680.[Medline]

Even-Ram, S., and Yamada, K. M. (2005). Cell migration in 3D matrix. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol 17, 524–532.[CrossRef][Medline]

Friedl, P. (2004). Prespecification and plasticity: shifting mechanisms of cell migration. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol 16, 14–23.[CrossRef][Medline]

Gaggioli, C., Hooper, S., Hidalgo-Carcedo, C., Grosse, R., Marshall, J. F., Harrington, K., and Sahai, E. (2007). Fibroblast-led collective invasion of carcinoma cells with differing roles for RhoGTPases in leading and following cells. Nat. Cell Biol 9, 1392–1400.[CrossRef][Medline]

Galbraith, C. G., and Sheetz, M. P. (1997). A micromachined device provides a new bend on fibroblast traction forces. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94, 9114–9118.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Galbraith, C. G., Yamada, K. M., and Sheetz, M. P. (2002). The relationship between force and focal complex development. J. Cell Biol 159, 695–705.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Gao, Z. et al. (2005). Deletion of the PDGFR-beta gene affects key fibroblast functions important for wound healing. J. Biol. Chem 280, 9375–9389.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Goldsmith, E. C., Hoffman, A., Morales, M. O., Potts, J. D., Price, R. L., McFadden, A., Rice, M., and Borg, T. K. (2004). Organization of fibroblasts in the heart. Dev. Dyn 230, 787–794.[CrossRef][Medline]

Grillo, H. C., Watts, G. T., and Gross, J. (1957). The marginal location of the contraction mechanism in open wounds. Amer. Coll. Surg. Surgical Forum 8, 586–589.

Grinnell, F. (2003). Fibroblast biology in three-dimensional collagen matrices. Trends Cell Biol 13, 264–269.[CrossRef][Medline]

Grinnell, F., Ho, C. H., Tamariz, E., Lee, D. J., and Skuta, G. (2003). Dendritic fibroblasts in three-dimensional collagen matrices. Mol. Biol. Cell 14, 384–395.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Grinnell, F., Rocha, L. B., Iucu, C., Rhee, S., and Jiang, H. (2006). Nested collagen matrices: a new model to study migration of human fibroblast populations in three dimensions. Exp. Cell Res 312, 86–94.[Medline]

Gross, J., Farinelli, W., Sadow, P., Anderson, R., and Bruns, R. (1995). On the mechanism of skin wound "contraction": a granulation tissue "knockout" with a normal phenotype. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 92, 5982–5986.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Harris, A. K. (1973). Cell surface movements related to cell locomotion. Ciba Found. Symp 14, 3–26.[Medline]

Ingber, D. E. (2006). Cellular mechanotransduction: putting all the pieces together again. FASEB J 20, 811–827.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Jiang, H., Rhee, S., Ho, C.-H., and Grinnell, F. (2008). Distinguishing fibroblast promigratory and procontractile growth factor environments in 3D collagen matrices. FASEB J (in press).

Johnson, T. M., Lowe, L., Brown, M. D., Sullivan, M. J., and Nelson, B. R. (1993). Histology and physiology of tissue expansion. J. Dermatol. Surg. Oncol 19, 1074–1078.[Medline]

Knock, G. A., Shaifta, Y., Snetkov, V. A., Vowles, B., Drndarski, S., Ward, J. P., and Aaronson, P. I. (2008). Interaction between src family kinases and rho-kinase in agonist-induced Ca2+-sensitization of rat pulmonary artery. Cardiovasc. Res 77, 570–579.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Kolega, J. (1986). Effects of mechanical tension on protrusive activity and microfilament and intermediate filament organization in an epidermal epithelium moving in culture. J. Cell Biol 102, 1400–1411.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Langevin, H. M., Cornbrooks, C. J., and Taatjes, D. J. (2004). Fibroblasts form a body-wide cellular network. Histochem. Cell Biol 122, 7–15.[Medline]

Lauffenburger, D. A., and Horwitz, A. F. (1996). Cell migration: a physically integrated molecular process. Cell 84, 359–369.[CrossRef][Medline]

Li, W., Fan, J., Chen, M., Guan, S., Sawcer, D., Bokoch, G. M., and Woodley, D. T. (2004). Mechanism of human dermal fibroblast migration driven by type I collagen and platelet-derived growth factor-BB. Mol. Biol. Cell 15, 294–309.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Lo, C. M., Wang, H. B., Dembo, M., and Wang, Y. L. (2000). Cell movement is guided by the rigidity of the substrate. Biophys. J 79, 144–152.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Mitchison, T. J., and Cramer, L. P. (1996). Actin-based cell motility and cell locomotion. Cell 84, 371–379.[CrossRef][Medline]

Newman, S. A., Frenz, D. A., Tomasek, J. J., and Rabuzzi, D. D. (1985). Matrix-driven translocation of cells and nonliving particles. Science 228, 885–889.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Peacock, E.E.J. (1984). Wound Repair, Philadelphia, PA: W. B. Saunders.

Petroll, W. M., Cavanagh, H. D., and Jester, J. V. (2004). Dynamic three-dimensional visualization of collagen matrix remodeling and cytoskeltal organization in living corneal fibroblasts. Scanning 26, 1–10.[Medline]

Raeber, G. P., Lutolf, M. P., and Hubbell, J. A. (2007). Part II: Fibroblasts preferentially migrate in the direction of principal strain. Biomech. Model Mechanobiol Epub ahead of print.

Rhee, S., and Grinnell, F. (2006). P21-activated kinase 1, convergence point in PDGF- and LPA-stimulated collagen matrix contraction by human fibroblasts. J. Cell Biol 172, 423–432.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Rhee, S., Jiang, H., Ho, C. H., and Grinnell, F. (2007). Microtubule function in fibroblast spreading is modulated according to the tension state of cell-matrix interactions. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 104, 5425–5430.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Ridley, A. J., Schwartz, M. A., Burridge, K., Firtel, R. A., Ginsberg, M. H., Borisy, G., Parsons, J. T., and Horwitz, A. R. (2003). Cell migration: integrating signals from front to back. Science 302, 1704–1709.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Riento, K., and Ridley, A. J. (2003). Rocks: multifunctional kinases in cell behaviour. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol 4, 446–456.[CrossRef][Medline]

Roeder, B. A., Kokini, K., Sturgis, J. E., Robinson, J. P., and Voytik-Harbin, S. L. (2002). Tensile mechanical properties of three-dimensional type I collagen extracellular matrices with varied microstructure. J. Biomech. Eng 124, 214–222.[CrossRef][Medline]

Roy, P., Petroll, W. M., Cavanagh, H. D., Chuong, C. J., and Jester, J. V. (1997). An in vitro force measurement assay to study the early mechanical interaction between corneal fibroblasts and collagen matrix. Exp. Cell Res 232, 106–117.[CrossRef][Medline]

Sahai, E., and Marshall, C. J. (2003). Differing modes of tumour cell invasion have distinct requirements for Rho/ROCK signalling and extracellular proteolysis. Nat. Cell Biol 5, 711–719.[CrossRef][Medline]

Sawhney, R. K., and Howard, J. (2002). Slow local movements of collagen fibers by fibroblasts drive the rapid global self-organization of collagen gels. J. Cell Biol 157, 1083–1091.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Shreiber, D. I., Barocas, V. H., and Tranquillo, R. T. (2003). Temporal variations in cell migration and traction during fibroblast-mediated gel compaction. Biophys. J 84, 4102–4114.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Silver, F. H., Siperko, L. M., and Seehra, G. P. (2002). Mechanobiology of force transduction in dermal tissue. Skin Res. Technol 8, 1–21.[Medline]

Singer, I. I., Kawka, D. W., Kazazis, D. M., and Clark, R. A. (1984). In vivo co-distribution of fibronectin and actin fibers in granulation tissue: immunofluorescence and electron microscope studies of the fibronexus at the myofibroblast surface. J. Cell Biol 98, 2091–2106.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Stopak, D., and Harris, A. K. (1982). Connective tissue morphogenesis by fibroblast traction. I. Tissue culture observations. Dev. Biol 90, 383–398.[CrossRef][Medline]

Tamariz, E., and Grinnell, F. (2002). Modulation of fibroblast morphology and adhesion during collagen matrix remodeling. Mol. Biol. Cell 13, 3915–3929.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Tomasek, J. J., Gabbiani, G., Hinz, B., Chaponnier, C., and Brown, R. A. (2002). Myofibroblasts and mechano-regulation of connective tissue remodelling. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol 3, 349–363.[CrossRef][Medline]

Tonnesen, M. G., Feng, X., and Clark, R. A. (2000). Angiogenesis in wound healing. J. Investig. Dermatol. Symp. Proc 5, 40–46.[CrossRef][Medline]

Totsukawa, G., Wu, Y., Sasaki, Y., Hartshorne, D. J., Yamakita, Y., Yamashiro, S., and Matsumura, F. (2004). Distinct roles of MLCK and ROCK in the regulation of membrane protrusions and focal adhesion dynamics during cell migration of fibroblasts. J. Cell Biol 164, 427–439.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Tranquillo, R. T. (1999). Self-organization of tissue-equivalents: the nature and role of contact guidance. Biochem. Soc. Symp 65, 27–42.[Medline]

Tucker, R. P., Edwards, B. F., and Erickson, C. A. (1985). Tension in the culture dish: microfilament organization and migratory behavior of quail neural crest cells. Cell Motil 5, 225–237.[CrossRef][Medline]

Varani, J., Schuger, L., Dame, M. K., Leonard, C., Fligiel, S. E., Kang, S., Fisher, G. J., and Voorhees, J. J. (2004). Reduced fibroblast interaction with intact collagen as a mechanism for depressed collagen synthesis in photodamaged skin. J. Invest. Dermatol 122, 1471–1479.[CrossRef][Medline]

Vogel, V., and Sheetz, M. P. (2006). Local force and geometry sensing regulate cell functions. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol 7, 265–275.[CrossRef][Medline]

Wakatsuki, T., Kolodney, M. S., Zahalak, G. I., and Elson, E. L. (2000). Cell mechanics studied by a reconstituted model tissue. Biophys. J 79, 2353–2368.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Wang, H. B., Dembo, M., Hanks, S. K., and Wang, Y. (2001). Focal adhesion kinase is involved in mechanosensing during fibroblast migration. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98, 11295–11300.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Wiig, H., Rubin, K., and Reed, R. K. (2003). New and active role of the interstitium in control of interstitial fluid pressure: potential therapeutic consequences. Acta Anaesthesiol. Scand 47, 111–121.[CrossRef][Medline]

Wilhelmi, B. J., Blackwell, S. J., Mancoll, J. S., and Phillips, L. G. (1998). Creep vs. stretch: a review of the viscoelastic properties of skin. Ann. Plast. Surg 41, 215–219.[CrossRef][Medline]

Wolf, K., Wu, Y. I., Liu, Y., Geiger, J., Tam, E., Overall, C., Stack, M. S., and Friedl, P. (2007). Multi-step pericellular proteolysis controls the transition from individual to collective cancer cell invasion. Nat. Cell Biol 9, 893–904.[CrossRef][Medline]

Wozniak, M. A., Desai, R., Solski, P. A., Der, C. J., and Keely, P. J. (2003). ROCK-generated contractility regulates breast epithelial cell differentiation in response to the physical properties of a three-dimensional collagen matrix. J. Cell Biol 163, 583–595.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Yamada, K. M., and Cukierman, E. (2007). Modeling tissue morphogenesis and cancer in 3D. Cell 130, 601–610.[CrossRef][Medline]

Yatomi, Y., Igarashi, Y., Yang, L., Hisano, N., Qi, R., Asazuma, N., Satoh, K., Ozaki, Y., and Kume, S. (1997). Sphingosine 1-phosphate, a bioactive sphingolipid abundantly stored in platelets, is a normal constituent of human plasma and serum. J. Biochem 121, 969–973.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Zaman, M. H., Trapani, L. M., Siemeski, A., MacKellar, D., Gong, H., Kamm, R. D., Wells, A., Lauffenburger, D. A., and Matsudaira, P. (2006). Migration of tumor cells in 3D matrices is governed by matrix stiffness along with cell-matrix adhesion and proteolysis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 103, 10889–10894.[Abstract/Free Full Text]





This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplmental Materials
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
E07-09-0930v1
19/5/2051    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Miron-Mendoza, M.
Right arrow Articles by Grinnell, F.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Miron-Mendoza, M.
Right arrow Articles by Grinnell, F.


Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Copyright © 2008 by The American Society for Cell Biology. Terms of copyright protection, warranties, and disclaimers.