|
|
|
|
Vol. 19, Issue 8, 3564-3575, August 2008
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, and the Miles and Shirley Fiterman Center for Digestive Diseases, Rochester, MN 55905
Submitted October 3, 2007;
Revised May 21, 2008;
Accepted May 22, 2008
Monitoring Editor: Vivek Malhotra
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The multiple interaction domains of Eps15 make it well suited to function as an endocytic adaptor. Its N-terminal domain contains three Eps15 homology (EH) domains, a protein–protein interacting module that recognizes NPF (asparagine-proline-phenylalanine) motifs. Through these EH domains, Eps15 interacts with other endocytic accessory proteins such as epsin and synaptojanin (Haffner et al., 1997
; Chen et al., 1998
). A central coiled-coiled domain mediates Eps15 homo-oligomerization as well as hetero-oligomerization with Eps15R (Tebar et al., 1997
; Coda et al., 1998
). Slightly more C-terminal is an
120-amino acid region containing multiple DPF (aspartate-proline-phenylalanine) repeats, thus facilitating interactions with AP-2 (Benmerah et al., 1996
; Iannolo et al., 1997
), whereas at the very C-terminus are two ubiquitin-interacting motifs (UIMs), which are necessary for intra- and intermolecular interactions with ubiquitin and/or monoubiquitination (Klapisz et al., 2002
; Polo et al., 2002
; Hoeller et al., 2006
). Many of these structural domains appear to be essential for the participation of Eps15 in endocytosis. For example, cells expressing the AP-2–binding region of Eps15 alone or, alternatively, an Eps15 truncation mutant lacking the EH domains no longer exhibit a punctate distribution of clathrin and/or AP-2 at the plasma membrane and have a reduced capacity for endocytosis (Benmerah et al., 1999
, 2000
). Furthermore, addition of glutathione S-transferase (GST) fusion proteins of the C-terminal domain of Eps15 containing the AP-2–binding region to perforated cells attenuates the endocytosis of both transferrin and EGF (Benmerah et al., 1998
). More recently, the UIMs of Eps15 have been implicated in mediating either a direct or indirect interaction with ubiquitinated EGFRs, and additionally, appear to be important for receptor internalization (de Melker et al., 2004
; Sigismund et al., 2005
).
In addition to the association of Eps15 with plasma membrane–generated clathrin-coated pits, Eps15 has also been observed to localize to a perinuclear compartment (Tebar et al., 1996
; Torrisi et al., 1999
; Kent et al., 2002
). Moreover, detailed structural studies have shown that the appendage domain of
-adaptin, a subunit of the TGN- and endosome-localized AP-1 complex, binds to Eps15 (Kent et al., 2002
). However, the specific region of Eps15 that mediates the interaction with
-adaptin is unknown as is whether the association between Eps15 and AP-1 serves a functional role at the TGN or rather at an endosomal compartment.
In this study, we present morphological and biochemical evidence indicating that Eps15 directly associates with the TGN, and furthermore, that this Golgi localization is supported by an interaction with AP-1. Indeed, we have identified a novel 14-amino acid motif in the DPF repeats domain of Eps15 that is required for the interaction between Eps15 and the
-adaptin appendage domain. Importantly, functional studies demonstrated that the Eps15–AP-1 complex mediates the formation of TGN-derived vesicles containing various cargo proteins, including late endosomal as well as constitutively secreted proteins.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
EH2/EH3) have been previously described (Cao et al., 2005
14aa, depicted in Figure 3, was generated by using PCR-based site-directed mutagenesis and verified by sequencing. Constructs encoding for GST-tagged Eps15 EH domains (amino acids 1–320), coiled-coil domain (amino acids 321–540), DPF repeats + proline-rich motif (amino acids 541–790), UIMs (amino acids 791–897), DPF repeats alone (amino acids 630–733), or DPF repeats lacking the C-terminal 14 amino acids (amino acids 630–719) were generated by using PCR to amplify the respective domain from full-length Eps15 cDNA and subsequently cloning the fragments into the pGEX-4T-1 vector (Life Sciences, St. Petersburg, FL). A construct encoding for temperature-sensitive vesicular stomatitis virus glycoprotein (VSVG) was a gift from J. Lippincott-Schwartz (National Institutes of Health) and was subcloned into the pEGFP-N1 vector (Clontech, Palo Alto, CA; Cao et al., 2000
-adaptin (accession number XM_214107) was amplified by PCR using rat liver cDNA as a template and the following primers: 5'-ACTCCCGGGCTCTGTCCCCAGGATGGTGCCTT-3' (forward); 5'-CAGTAAGTTACTGCCACGTCTCCACAGGCAAG-3' (reverse). A construct encoding for GST-tagged
-adaptin appendage domain (amino acids 704–786) was generated by amplifying the relevant region from full-length
-adaptin cDNA using the following primers: 5'-CCGGAATTCTCAGAGGAGGCTGTT-3' (forward); 5'-CCGCTCGAGCTGCCACGTCTCCAC-3' (reverse). The resulting PCR product was subsequently cloned into the pGEX-4T-1 vector.
Human AP-1
1 small interfering RNA (siRNA) pool and nontargeting siRNA pool were purchased from Dharmacon Research (Boulder, CO).
Antibodies
The anti-Eps15 polyclonal antibodies Eps15(I) and Eps15(II) were raised against the peptide sequences EWAKRESEREEEQRLARLNQQEQED (amino acids 855–882) and SQQEISSMQMRLAMKDLETDNNQSN (amino acids 485–510), respectively, and affinity-purified as previously described (Henley and McNiven, 1996
). A polyclonal anti-Eps15 antibody was also purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Santa Cruz, CA) The monoclonal anti-Myc antibody was obtained from Zymed Laboratories (South San Francisco, CA), and the polyclonal anti-Myc antibody was obtained from Cell Signaling Technology (Beverly, MA). Generation of the polyclonal anti-TGN38 antibody has been previously described (Cao et al., 2000
). The monoclonal anti-clathrin antibody (X22) was collected from the supernatant of the X22 hybridoma cell line (ATCC, Manassas, VA). The monoclonal anti-TGN38 antibody was kind gift from K. E. Howell (University of Colorado School of Medicine). The monoclonal anti-AP-2 (
) and polyclonal anti-AP-1 (
) antibodies used for immunoblotting were kindly provided by L. M. Traub (University of Pittsburg School of Medicine). The monoclonal anti-AP-1 (
) antibody used for immunofluorescence was purchased from Sigma (St. Louis, MO). The anti-p230 antibody and anti-GM130 was obtained from BD Transduction Laboratories (Lexington, KY). The monoclonal anti-GST antibody was obtained from Santa Cruz Biotechnology, and the monoclonal
-tubulin antibody was purchased form Amersham Biosciences (Piscataway, NJ).
Cell Culture and Transfection
BHK-21 cells (ATCC, CCL-10), HeLa cells (ATCC, CCL-2), and HuH7 cells (provided by Dr. G. J. Gores, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine) were maintained in Eagle's minimum essential medium containing Earle's salts and L-glutamine (Mediatech, Herndon, VA) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum, 1 mM sodium pyruvate, 1 mM nonessential amino acids, 1.5 g/l sodium bicarbonate, 100 U/ml penicillin, and 100 µg/ml streptomycin (Invitrogen). Rat fibroblasts (ATCC, CRL-1213) were maintained in Ham's F-12K medium supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum, 100 U/ml penicillin, and 100 µg/ml streptomycin. All cells were kept in a 5% CO2/95% air incubator at 37°C, except for during the M6PR-GFP and VSVG-ts-green fluorescent protein (GFP) trafficking assays. Cells were transiently transfected using the Lipofectamine Plus Reagent kit according to the manufacturer's protocol (Invitrogen). Transfection of HeLa cells with siRNA was performed using Oligofectamine as specified by the manufacturer's protocol (Invitrogen).
Peptide Injection and Fluorescence Microscopy
HeLa cells were injected with 100 nM peptide (amino acids 720–733 of Eps15) diluted in injection buffer (10 mM KH2PO4, pH 7.2, 75 mM KCl). After 6 h, cells were fixed and processed for immunofluorescence as previously described (Cao et al., 1998
). For colocalization experiments, cells were grown on coverslips for 1–2 d before being processed for immunofluorescence. Cells were viewed with an Axiovert 35 or 200M microscope (Carl Zeiss, Thornwood, NY) using a 63x, 1.4 NA, oil-immersion lens, and images were acquired with an Orca II or Orca III ERG camera (Hamamatsu, Bridgewater, NJ) using IPLab (Scanalytics, Billerica, MA). Images were subsequently adjusted in Adobe Photoshop (San Jose, CA).
Golgi Fractionation and Coimmunoprecipitation
An enriched stacked Golgi fraction (SGFII) was isolated from rat liver following previously published methods (Taylor et al., 1997
). For coimmunoprecipitation assays, 1 mg of fractionated Golgi samples was incubated with anti-Eps15(I) or anti-Eps15(II) antibodies and combined with protein A-Sepharose beads in immunoprecipitation buffer (20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.4, 150 mM NaCl, 0.5% Triton X-100, 15 mM NaF, 2 mM Na3VO4, and complete protease inhibitors; Roche, Indianapolis, IN) for 2 h at 4°C. The beads were then washed four times with immunoprecipitation buffer and boiled in reducing Laemmli sample buffer. Samples were separated on 7.5% SDS-polyacrylamide gels using electrophoresis and transferred onto PVDF membranes. Immunoblotting was performed using anti-Eps15(II), anti-clathrin, or anti-AP-1 (polyclonal) antibodies.
GST Pulldown Assays
HeLa cells were lysed by sonication in lysis buffer (25 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.4, 100 mM NaCl, 1 mM DTT, 1% NP-40, 15 mM NaF, 2 mM Na3VO4, and complete protease inhibitors) and cleared by centrifugation at 14,000 rpm for 10 min. The cleared supernatants were used as cell lysates for the pulldown assay. Cell lysates (1 mg) were incubated for 2 h with GST or GST-fusion proteins (5 µg) coupled to glutathione-agarose beads at 4°C. For the in vitro binding assay, 5 µg of GST or GST-
-adaptin appendage domain coupled to glutathione-agarose beads was incubated with 5 µg of His-Eps15, purified according to the manufacturer's protocol (Qiagen), for 2 h at 4°C. When indicated, peptide (amino acids 720–733 of Eps15) was added directly to the assay mixture at a final concentration of 1 or 10 µM. After incubation with either cell lysates or purified His-Eps15, beads were washed four times with wash buffer (25 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.4, 300 mM NaCl, 1 mM DTT, 1% NP-40, 15 mM NaF, 2 mM Na3VO4, and complete protease inhibitors), and the bound proteins were eluted from the beads with reducing Laemmli sample buffer. Samples were separated on 7.5% SDS-polyacrylamide gels using electrophoresis, transferred onto PVDF membranes, and immunoblotted using anti-AP-1 (monoclonal), anti-AP-2, anti-Eps15, or anti-GST antibodies.
M6PR-GFP and VSVG-ts-GFP Trafficking Assays
Transport of M6PR-GFP and VSVG-ts-GFP was assayed essentially as previously described (Cao et al., 2000
, 2005
). For assaying transport of M6PR-GFP to dextran-labeled late endosomes, cells expressing M6PR-GFP were first incubated for 2 h at 20°C to block transport from the Golgi, followed by a 1-h incubation with rhodamine-labeled dextran at 37°C. For assaying transport of VSVG-ts-GFP in AP-1 (
)-depleted cells, HeLa cells were treated with control siRNA or siRNA probes to AP-1 (
) for 48 h before VSVG-ts-GFP transfection. Cells were then either homogenized and subjected to Western blot analysis to assess AP1-(
) levels or viewed by IF microscopy to assess the distribution of nascent VSVG. After the various trafficking assays, cells were processed for fluorescence microscopy and imaged as described above. For quantitation of VSVG-ts-GFP or M6PR-GFP at the Golgi region, the fluorescence intensity within a standardized perinuclear region was measured in IPLab using images taken at the same acquisition settings (exposure time, 5 s). Representative images for each set of trafficking assays were adjusted in Adobe Photoshop using identical "Levels" settings.
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
We next wanted to confirm and extend the morphological observations made above indicating that Eps15 localizes to the TGN in association with AP-1 using a biochemical approach. Therefore, coimmunoprecipitation assays were performed using fractionated Golgi membranes from rat liver followed by Western blot analysis. Indeed, two different purified anti-Eps15 antibodies [Eps15(I) and Eps15(II)] coimmunoprecipitated both clathrin and AP-1 from Golgi membranes (Figure 2D). Thus, together these findings using both morphological and biochemical methods strongly suggest that these three coat proteins form a complex at the TGN.
A Specific Motif in the DPF Repeat Domain of Eps15 Is Required for Direct Binding between Eps15 and AP-1 But Not AP-2
A C-terminal domain of Eps15 rich in DPF repeats has been demonstrated to directly interact with the appendage domain of
-adaptin (Benmerah et al., 1996
; Iannolo et al., 1997
), one of the large subunits of the AP-2 complex, and thus participates in the targeting of Eps15 to clathrin-coated vesicles at the plasma membrane (Benmerah et al., 2000
). Similarly, a GST fusion protein of the appendage domain of
-adaptin, a large subunit of the AP-1 complex analogous to
-adaptin, can pull down Eps15 from brain cytosol (Kent et al., 2002
). However, the domains of Eps15 responsible for this interaction with AP-1 have not been determined. Moreover, although the AP complexes are thought to exhibit a similar domain structure (Kirchhausen, 1999
; Edeling et al., 2006
), the
-adaptin appendage domain appears to lack the protein-binding platform domain present in the
-adaptin appendage domain (Kent et al., 2002
) and thus might interact with Eps15 through distinct motifs. Therefore, to identify the specific domains of Eps15 that might mediate the interaction with AP-1, GST pulldown assays were performed using four distinct functional domains of Eps15 tagged to GST. These domains, as illustrated in Figure 3A, represent the three N-terminal EH domains, which interact with proteins such as epsin (Chen et al., 1998
) and synaptojanin (Haffner et al., 1997
); a coiled-coiled domain that is thought to mediate Eps15 homo-oligomerization as well as hetero-oligomerization with Eps15R (Tebar et al., 1997
; Coda et al., 1998
); an AP-2–binding domain comprising the DPF repeats + a proline-rich region (DPF + P; Benmerah et al., 1996
; Iannolo et al., 1997
; Benmerah et al., 2000
); and the two C-terminal UIMs involved in self -ubiquitination as well as intra- and intermolecular interactions with ubiquitinated residues (Klapisz et al., 2002
; Polo et al., 2002
; Hoeller et al., 2006
). The different GST fusion proteins of specific Eps15 domains were incubated with HeLa cell lysates, and the bound proteins were analyzed by Western blot, probing with an anti-AP-1 antibody. As shown in Figure 3B, only the DPF+P domain pulled down AP-1, indicating that this domain of Eps15 rich in DPF repeats might contain motifs that mediate not only interactions with AP-2, but also with AP-1. Indeed, a 14-amino acid motif at the C-terminal end of this DPF repeats domain, distinct from the known AP-2–binding region of this domain, has been predicted to bind to AP-1, although never definitively confirmed (Duncan and Payne, 2003
). Therefore, constructs encoding for GST fusion proteins containing either the entire DPF repeats domain (amino acids 630–733; GST-DPF wt) or the DPF repeats domain lacking these 14 amino acids (amino acids 630–719; GST-DPF
14aa) were generated, and the ability of these mutant fusion proteins to isolate AP-1 versus AP-2 from HeLa cell lysates was tested. Interestingly, although the full-length Eps15 DPF repeats domain bound to both AP-1 and AP-2, binding of the truncated Eps15 DPF repeats domain to AP-1 was significantly reduced, whereas the interaction with AP-2 was maintained (Figure 3C). Thus, these 14 amino acids at the C-terminal end of the DPF repeats domain appear to be particularly important for the Eps15–AP-1 interaction; however, they are dispensable for the binding of Eps15 to AP-2.
|
14aa-myc), and the colocalization of these Eps15 proteins with AP-1 at the TGN was observed using fluorescence microscopy. Indeed, the full-length Myc-tagged Eps15 protein was localized at the TGN along with AP-1 (Figures 2, C–C''', and 3, D and E), whereas the Eps15
14aa-myc deletion mutant was no longer targeted to the TGN (Figure 3, F and G). However, the Eps15
14aa-myc deletion mutant did continue to associate with AP-2–positive clathrin-coated pits at the cell surface (Figure 3, H and I; data not shown), indicating that this mutant Eps15 is still capable of binding to AP-2 in cells. Thus, these observations in cultured cells further support our in vitro results suggesting that the AP-1– and AP-2–binding motifs of Eps15 are distinct.
To further test the significance of the identified 14 amino acids within the Eps15 DPF repeats domain as an AP-1–binding motif, we aimed to interfere with or block this interaction both in vitro and in living cells through use of a synthetic peptide encompassing the putative AP-1–binding motif (amino acids 720–733 of Eps15). We first performed in vitro binding assays to characterize the ability of full-length His-tagged Eps15 to bind to GST-tagged
-adaptin appendage domain (amino acids 704–786) in the presence of increasing concentrations of the 14-amino acid peptide. As shown in Figure 4A, GST-
-adaptin appendage domain was able to pull down His-Eps15 in the absence of peptide, indicating a direct interaction; however, in the presence of peptide, this association between Eps15 and the
-adaptin appendage domain was reduced (1 µM peptide) or completely prevented (10 µM peptide). Thus, these results suggest that the 14-amino acid motif at the C-terminus of the Eps15 DPF repeats domain is essential for the direct interaction between the
-adaptin subunit of AP-1 and Eps15.
|
Eps15 Plays a Functional Role in the Trafficking of Nascent Secretory Proteins from the TGN
Our observations support the premise that Eps15 localizes to the TGN through a 14-amino acid AP-1–binding motif; however, whether this interaction with AP-1 serves a functional role during specific cellular processes remained to be determined. We hypothesized that, similar to the role of the Eps15–AP-2 complex in cargo sorting and clathrin-coated vesicle formation at the cell surface during endocytosis (Benmerah et al., 1998
, 2000
), an Eps15–AP-1 complex might perform an analogous function at the TGN. Trafficking of the mannose 6-phosphate receptor (M6PR) between the TGN and late endosomes is known to occur via an AP-1–dependent pathway (Waguri et al., 2003
). Therefore, we used GFP-tagged M6PR (M6PR-GFP) as a marker to test whether disruption of the Eps15–AP-1 interaction affects the transit of Golgi cargo proteins destined for endosomes from the TGN. As depicted by the schematic in Figure 5A, BHK cells were cotransfected with constructs encoding for M6PR-GFP and Myc-tagged versions of either Eps15 wt, Eps15
14aa, or an Eps15 deletion mutant lacking the second and third N-terminal EH domains (Eps15
EH2/EH3), a known inhibitor of clathrin-mediated endocytosis (Benmerah et al., 1999
), and allowed to recover for 24 h. Subsequently, cells were incubated at 20°C for 2 h to block the exit of M6PR-GFP from the Golgi. In addition, cells were treated with cycloheximide to prevent the synthesis of new M6PR-GFP, which could interfere with tracking the effects of Eps15 wild-type and deletion mutants on the trafficking of M6PR-GFP from the TGN to endosomes. The temperature-induced block in Golgi trafficking was then released by shifting cells from 20 to 37°C for 1 h, and simultaneously, cells were incubated with rhodamine-labeled dextran to identify endosomes. Indeed, control BHK cells expressing M6PR-GFP and incubated with rhodamine-labeled dextran contained brightly labeled endosomes that had a red dextran-filled lumen surrounded by a ring of M6PR-GFP (Figure 5B).
|
14aa or Eps15
EH2/EH3, when compared with Myc-tagged Eps15 wt–expressing cells. As shown in Figure 5C, cells expressing Eps15 wt displayed substantial levels of nascent M6PR-GFP at the TGN when maintained at 20°C; however, upon shifting of cells to 37°C, thereby releasing the block in Golgi exit, M6PR-GFP was efficiently trafficked to peripherally localized endosomes within 1 h. In contrast, this TGN-to-endosome transport was significantly reduced in cells expressing either Eps15
14aa (Figure 5, D–D'') or Eps15
EH2/EH3 (Figure 5, E–E''). In support of these morphological observations, quantitation of the fluorescence intensity of Golgi-localized M6PR-GFP (see Materials and Methods) revealed about a twofold increase in Golgi-retained M6PR-GFP in cells expressing either of the Eps15 deletion mutants compared with cells expressing wild-type Eps15 (Figure 5F, 37°C, 1 h). Thus, these results suggest that Eps15 is involved in the trafficking of nascent proteins from the TGN to endosomes and furthermore, that an interaction between Eps15 and AP-1 is important for this process.
The dependence of M6PR sequestration and trafficking on Eps15 is in agreement with these processes being mediated by clathrin-coated vesicles and associated adaptors (Bonifacino and Traub, 2003
; Ghosh et al., 2003
; Hinners and Tooze, 2003
). However, we next wanted to determine whether Eps15 might also contribute to the exit of additional types of secretory proteins from the TGN. For these assays, we monitored the trafficking of a GFP-tagged, temperature-sensitive variant of the vesicular stomatitis virus G protein (VSVG-ts-GFP), which undergoes constitutive transport from the TGN to the cell surface where it is inserted into the plasma membrane. This tagged protein has been widely used to study the exit of nascent proteins from the TGN (for a few examples, see Toomre et al., 1999
; Cao et al., 2000
; Folsch et al., 2003
; Polishchuk et al., 2003
) and possesses a point mutation (F204S) that causes the protein to misfold at 40°C, resulting in its retention in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER; Gallione and Rose, 1985
; Presley et al., 1997
; Scales et al., 1997
). Similar to the M6PR-GFP–trafficking assays and as depicted by the schematic shown in Figure 6A, BHK cells were cotransfected with constructs encoding for VSVG-ts-GFP and Myc-tagged versions of either Eps15 wt or one of the Eps15 deletion mutants (Eps15
14aa or Eps15
EH2/EH3). After 20 h of expression at the restrictive temperature of 40°C, cells were treated with cycloheximide and then shifted to the permissive temperature of 32°C, allowing for transit to the Golgi and subsequently to the plasma membrane. In cells expressing Eps15 wt, within 15 min of shifting to the permissive temperature, VSVG-ts-GFP had exited the ER and accumulated in the ER–Golgi intermediate compartment and Golgi (Figure 6, B and B'). By 1 h, the cargo had been transported from the TGN, and by 2 h most of the VSVG-ts-GFP was present at the plasma membrane (Figure 6, B'' and B'''). Surprisingly, although ER-to-Golgi trafficking appeared normal (Figure 6, C and C'), expression of the Eps15 deletion mutant defective in AP-1 binding, Eps15
14aa, impaired the exit of VSVG-ts-GFP from the TGN. Indeed, even at the 1- and 2-h time points, a significant delay in the transport of VSVG-ts-GFP from the TGN to the cell surface could be detected (Figure 6, C'' and C'''). A similar phenotype was observed upon expression of the Eps15 dominant-negative Eps15
EH2/EH3, with transport of VSVG-ts-GFP out of the ER being unaffected (Figure 6, D and D'), whereas after 1 and 2 h at the permissive temperature, VSVG-ts-GFP was still largely retained in the Golgi (Figure 6, D'' and D'''). Quantitation of VSVG-ts-GFP transport based on the fluorescence intensity within a standardized area covering the Golgi region (Figure 6, B–D''', circles) revealed that expression of either of the Eps15 deletion mutants, Eps15
14aa or Eps15
EH2/EH3, induced a 2–2.5-fold retention of VSVG-ts-GFP in the Golgi in comparison to Eps15 wt–expressing cells (Figure 6E). Because neither of the Eps15 deletion mutants appeared to affect ER-to-Golgi transport of VSVG-ts-GFP, this suggests a specific step in trafficking from the TGN to the cell surface is defective in cells expressing the Eps15 deletion mutants.
|
-adaptin subunit of AP-2 is known to interact with Eps15 (Benmerah et al., 1996
-adaptin in cultured cells attenuates transferrin internalization, a marker for clathrin-mediated endocytosis (Owen et al., 1999
-adaptin appendage domain, the analogous Eps15-binding domain of the AP-1 complex (Figure 4A and Kent et al., 2002
-adaptin appendage domain (Supplementary Figure S2, A–A''') when compared with control cells expressing a
-adaptin appendage domain mutant (A716D) that no longer interacts with Eps15 (Kent et al., 2002
2.5-fold greater in cells expressing wild-type
-adaptin appendage domain thanin cells expressing the
-adaptin appendage domain A716D mutant (Supplementary Figure S2C). Thus, these results together with those above provide strong support to the concept that a specific Eps15–AP-1 interaction is essential for the efficient transport of nascent cargo from the TGN to both endosomes and the plasma membrane.
To further test if VSVG-ts-GFP accumulates at the TGN upon overexpression of the Eps15 deletion mutants, we examined the localization of VSVG-ts-GFP retained as a result of expression of Eps15 deletion mutants at 2 h of permissive temperature using the TGN marker, p230. As expected, VSVG-ts-GFP showed substantial colocalization with p230 (Supplementary Figure S3, A–A'') but not with transferrin recycling endosomes (Supplementary Figure S3, B–B''), in cells expressing Eps15
14aa and Eps15
EH2/EH3 (data not shown), indicating that VSVG-ts-GFP failed to exit the TGN in these mutant cells.
To ensure that the observed reduction of VSVG-ts-GFP transport from the TGN to the cell surface in Eps15 mutant cells is a direct effect on the Golgi and does not result from disruption of endocytosis, we tested for effects on internalization of transferrin. Importantly, no difference of transferrin uptake was observed between control cells and Eps15
14aa–expressing cells (Supplementary Figure S4, A and B). As shown in the graph of Supplementary Figure S4C, 97% of cells expressing Eps15
14aa showed normal transferrin uptake, indicating that inhibition of Eps15–AP-1 interaction directly affects the exit of the secretory protein from the TGN and the inhibitory effect is not a result of an endocytic disruption.
Although a role for AP-1 in trafficking of VSVG has been shown by others in nonpolarized cells (Folsch et al., 2003
; Cancino et al., 2007
; Gravotta et al., 2007
), we studied the effect of AP-1 depletion on trafficking of VSVG in HeLa cells. Western blot analysis showed a
90% knockdown of AP-1 (
) by treatment of AP-1 (
) siRNA (Figure 7A). AP-1 (
) depletion significantly disrupted the transport of VSVG-ts-GFP from the Golgi to the cell surface at 1 h (Figure 7, C and C') and 2 h (data not shown) after a shift to the permissive temperature. Substantial levels of VSVG-ts-GFP were observed at the Golgi region of the AP-1–knocked down cells in comparison to control-treated cells (Figure 7, B and B'). Quantitation of the fluorescence intensity of VSVG-ts-GFP localized at the Golgi region revealed that the AP-1 (
) knockdown induced a
2.5-fold retention of VSVG-ts-GFP at the Golgi compared with control siRNA-treated cells (Figure 7D). To test whether this peri-nuclear accumulation of VSVG-ts-GFP in AP-1 (
)-depleted cells represented the TGN, we compared the localization of retained VSVG-ts-GFP to the TGN marker, p230 (Figure 7, E–E'''). We observed a marked colocalization between the two proteins with the VSVG protein directly overlapping with significant portions of the TGN in AP-1–depleted cells. As the accumulated VSVG extended out beyond the TGN into adjacent compartments, we predicted that this represented a backlog of nascent protein into the cis and medial cisternae. To test this, AP-1–depleted cells were costained with markers to both the TGN (p230) and the cis-Golgi (GM130). This dual staining significantly increased the overlap between the retained VSVG-ts-GFP and the Golgi (Figure 7, F–F'''). In comparison, a more modest localization of the viral coat cargo with the transferrin-sorting compartment was observed (data not shown). Collectively, these data provide additional support for the premise that AP-1 is required for the transport of VSVG from the TGN to the plasma membrane.
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
-adaptin, a subunit of the AP-1 complex. Moreover, a 14-amino acid sequence at the C-terminus of the DPF repeats domain of Eps15 is specifically required for the interaction between Eps15 and AP-1, but not AP-2. Importantly, using M6PR-GFP and VSVG-ts-GFP trafficking assays, we show functional evidence supporting that Eps15 and AP-1 act together to mediate the transport of Golgi cargo proteins targeted to either endosomes or the plasma membrane, respectively. Thus, these results reveal an additional site of action for Eps15 in clathrin-mediated vesicle formation and protein sorting, namely the TGN, and provide insights into how Eps15 might differentially interact with the various AP complexes through specific motifs located in a common AP-binding domain.
A New Adaptor at the TGN
Although Eps15 has been observed at a perinuclear region by several different groups (Tebar et al., 1996
; Torrisi et al., 1999
; Kent et al., 2002
), it has been unclear whether this localization pattern represents the Golgi, a population of endosomes or an accumulation of surface clathrin-coated pits at a thicker region of the cell. Here using multiple reagents, including two distinct antibodies against Eps15 as well as Myc-tagged Eps15, we show that Eps15 localizes to the Golgi in cultured epithelial cells and fibroblasts, as indicated by the significant overlap in cells costained for Eps15 and classical Golgi markers such as p230 or TGN38 (Figure 1). Moreover, treatment of cells with the Golgi-disrupting agent BFA lead to a complete dispersal of Eps15 from the perinuclear region, further supporting that this localization pattern represents an association between Eps15 and the Golgi (Supplementary Figure S1). In addition to these morphological observations, coimmunoprecipitation experiments using Golgi membrane fractions isolated from rat liver provided biochemical evidence in support of the association between Eps15 and the Golgi (Figure 2D). Thus, although our observations do not exclude a potential association of Eps15 with a perinuclear endosomal compartment, they do suggest the presence of a Golgi-localized pool of Eps15 in multiple cell types.
Many of the accessory clathrin adaptor proteins that bind to AP-2, including Eps15, interact with the appendage or "ear" domain of
-adaptin. At the TGN, the
-adaptin appendage domain appears to function in an analogous manner and serves as a binding site for proteins that interact with AP-1 (Owen et al., 2004
; Edeling et al., 2006
). Interestingly, a potential
-adaptin–binding motif was previously identified in Eps15 based on the consensus sequence [D/E][G/A](0–1)F[G/A][D/E]
(Duncan and Payne, 2003
); however, whether this motif supported an interaction between Eps15 and AP-1 was not tested. Here we provide biochemical and morphological evidence supporting that this predicted site of interaction is a bona fide AP-1–binding motif. The
-adaptin–binding motif found in Eps15 was also reported to be present in other proteins such as EpsinR and
-synergin, which function in vesicle trafficking at the Golgi by interaction with AP-1 (Page et al., 1999
; Mills et al., 2003
), showing that the
-adaptin–binding motif in adaptor proteins is conserved one for interaction with AP-1. This domain appears to be particularly important for the Eps15–AP-1 interaction, whereas it is not required for the interaction between Eps15 and AP-2 (Figure 3). Indeed, the Eps15 deletion mutant lacking the C-terminal 14 amino acids of the DPF repeats domain (Eps15
14aa) colocalized with AP-2 in cells but not AP-1 (Figure 3, F–I). Accordingly, cells expressing this mutant exhibited normal levels of transferrin uptake, a marker for clathrin-mediated endocytosis (Supplementary Figure S4), whereas vesicle transport from the Golgi was reduced (Figures 5 and 6). Moreover, in contrast to the specific effects of the Eps15
14aa deletion mutant on the trafficking of Golgi cargo proteins, cells expressing the Eps15 dominant-negative Eps15
EH2/EH3 exhibited a reduction in both clathrin-mediated endocytosis, as previously reported (Benmerah et al., 1999
), as well as secretion (Figures 5 and 6; data not shown).
A Novel Function for Eps15 in the Transport of Nascent Proteins from the TGN
The inhibition of M6PR-GFP transport from the TGN in cells expressing the Eps15 deletion mutant defective in AP-1 binding, Eps15
14aa, is consistent with previous reports implicating AP-1 in the trafficking of M6PR between the TGN and endosomes (Bonifacino and Traub, 2003
; Ghosh et al., 2003
; Hinners and Tooze, 2003
). Another family of adaptor-related proteins, GGAs (Golgi-localized,
-ear–containing, Arf-binding proteins), are also present at the Golgi and are involved in M6PR sorting and trafficking (Ghosh et al., 2003
; Hinners and Tooze, 2003
; Bonifacino, 2004
). As the GAE (
-adaptin ear) domain of GGAs has high homology to the ear, or appendage, domain of the
-adaptin subunit of AP-1 (Hirst et al., 2000
; Takatsu et al., 2000
), there is a possibility that Eps15 may interact with GGAs to mediate proper TGN-to-endosome transport of M6PR. In support of our observations suggesting a role for an Eps15–AP-1 complex in M6PR trafficking, various
-adaptin appendage domain–binding proteins identified so far have shown a preference for AP-1 over GGAs (Lui et al., 2003
; Hirst et al., 2005
; Neubrand et al., 2005
; Kametaka et al., 2007
). Moreover, although not the focus of the study by Hirst et al. (2005)
, a preferential interaction between Eps15 and the
-adaptin appendage domain versus the GAE domain of GGA1 was detected using GST pulldown assays. Although we have not ruled out a role for GGAs in Eps15-mediated Golgi vesicle trafficking, our current study highlights the importance of AP-1 binding by Eps15 in the efficient transport of M6PR from the TGN.
Perhaps most surprising was finding that expression of the Eps15 deletion mutants impaired the transport of nascent VSVG-ts-GFP from the TGN to the cell surface (Figure 6). We observed that expression of the
-adaptin appendage domain lead to a dramatic accumulation of VSVG-ts-GFP in the Golgi (Supplementary Figure S2, A–A''' and C), but importantly, the transport of viral protein to the cell surface was normal in cells expressing the
-adaptin appendage domain A716D mutant defective in Eps15 binding (Supplementary Figure S2, B–B''' and C), indicating that the trafficking defects observed in cells expressing the wild-type
-adaptin appendage domain were a result of disrupting the interaction between Eps15 and AP-1. Finally, we found that reducing the levels of AP-1 (
) protein in cells via siRNA knockdown resulted in a 2.5-fold accumulation of nascent VSVG in a TGN (p230 positive) compartment (Figure 7).
The packaging and transport of constitutively secreted proteins such as VSVG-ts-GFP has traditionally been viewed as a vesicle coat–independent process mediated by large tubular carriers that are "pulled out" and subsequently "cut" from subdomains of the TGN (Hirschberg et al., 1998
; Polishchuk et al., 2000
; Polishchuk et al., 2003
), although additional models have also been proposed (Luini et al., 2005
). As an example, clathrin-coated structures containing AP-1B and polarized epithelial-specific AP-1 complex (Ohno et al., 1999
) have been implicated in the transport of VSVG from the TGN to the basolateral domain of polarized epithelial cells (Folsch et al., 2003
). Disruption of AP-1B function by microinjection of AP-1B antibody (Cancino et al., 2007
) or knockdown of AP-1B (Gravotta et al., 2007
) has been reported to block the sorting of VSVG to the basolateral surface in polarized epithelial cells. In nonpolarized cells, the interaction of AP-1 and Crn7 was shown to be required for the export of VSVG from the Golgi (Rybakin et al., 2006
). The cell types used in this current study are nonpolarized and, therefore, most likely express exclusively AP-1A. Very recently, it has been shown that transport of VSVG from the TGN in MDCK cells is indeed dependent upon a clathrin coat (Deborde et al., 2008
) providing additional detailed evidence that nascent VSVG-containing vesicles forming at the TGN would require a clathrin-based, AP1-Eps15 adaptor complex. Such a process would represent a specific modification of the machinery utilized at the endocytic pit from the plasma membrane (McNiven and Thompson, 2006
).
The identification here of a functional role for Eps15 in the secretory pathway through an interaction with AP-1 provides new information regarding the mechanisms of protein sorting and trafficking at the TGN, while also raising exciting new questions. Particularly interesting will be determining how the different domains of Eps15 contribute to regulating protein interactions, cargo sequestration, and vesicle formation at the plasma membrane versus the TGN, thus providing further insights into the similarities and differences in clathrin-mediated processes at distinct cellular sites (Duncan and Payne, 2003
; Robinson, 2004
; Traub, 2005
; McNiven and Thompson, 2006
).
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
Address correspondence to: Mark A. McNiven (mmcniven{at}mayo.edu)
Abbreviations used: AP, adaptor protein; BFA, brefeldin A; EH, Eps15 homology; ER, endoplasmic reticulum; Eps15, EGFR pathway substrate clone 15; GAE,
-adaptin ear; GGA, Golgi-localized,
-ear–containing, Arf-binding protein; M6PR, mannose 6-phosphate receptor; TGN, trans-Golgi network; UIM, ubiquitin-interacting motif; VSVG, vesicular stomatitis virus G protein.
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Benmerah, A., Begue, B., Dautry-Varsat, A., and Cerf-Bensussan, N. (1996). The ear of alpha-adaptin interacts with the COOH-terminal domain of the Eps 15 protein. J. Biol. Chem 271, 12111–12116.
Benmerah, A., Lamaze, C., Begue, B., Schmid, S. L., Dautry-Varsat, A., and Cerf-Bensussan, N. (1998). AP-2/Eps15 interaction is required for receptor-mediated endocytosis. J. Cell Biol 140, 1055–1062.
Benmerah, A., Poupon, V., Cerf-Bensussan, N., and Dautry-Varsat, A. (2000). Mapping of Eps15 domains involved in its targeting to clathrin-coated pits. J. Biol. Chem 275, 3288–3295.
Bonifacino, J. S. (2004). The GGA proteins: adaptors on the move. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol 5, 23–32.[CrossRef][Medline]
Bonifacino, J. S., and Traub, L. M. (2003). Signals for sorting of transmembrane proteins to endosomes and lysosomes. Annu. Rev. Biochem 72, 395–447.[CrossRef][Medline]
Cancino, J., Torrealba, C., Soza, A., Yuseff, M. I., Gravotta, D., Henklein, P., Rodriguez-Boulan, E., and Gonzalez, A. (2007). Antibody to AP1B adaptor blocks biosynthetic and recycling routes of basolateral proteins at recycling endosomes. Mol. Biol. Cell 18, 4872–4884.
Cao, H., Garcia, F., and McNiven, M. A. (1998). Differential distribution of dynamin isoforms in mammalian cells. Mol. Biol. Cell 9, 2595–2609.
Cao, H., Thompson, H. M., Krueger, E. W., and McNiven, M. A. (2000). Disruption of Golgi structure and function in mammalian cells expressing a mutant dynamin. J. Cell Sci 113, 1993–2002.[Abstract]
Cao, H., Weller, S., Orth, J. D., Chen, J., Huang, B., Chen, J. L., Stamnes, M., and McNiven, M. A. (2005). Actin and Arf1-dependent recruitment of a cortactin-dynamin complex to the Golgi regulates post-Golgi transport. Nat. Cell Biol 7, 483–492.[CrossRef][Medline]
Carbone, R., Fre, S., Iannolo, G., Belleudi, F., Mancini, P., Pelicci, P. G., Torrisi, M. R., and Di Fiore, P. P. (1997). eps15 and eps15R are essential components of the endocytic pathway. Cancer Res 57, 5498–5504.
Chen, H., Fre, S., Slepnev, V. I., Capua, M. R., Takei, K., Butler, M. H., Di Fiore, P. P., and De Camilli, P. (1998). Epsin is an EH-domain-binding protein implicated in clathrin-mediated endocytosis. Nature 394, 793–797.[CrossRef][Medline]
Coda, L., Salcini, A. E., Confalonieri, S., Pelicci, G., Sorkina, T., Sorkin, A., Pelicci, P. G., and Di Fiore, P. P. (1998). Eps15R is a tyrosine kinase substrate with c