![[Feedback]](/icons/banner/feedbackACT.gif){kind=icon}
![[For Subscribers]](/icons/banner/subscriberACT.gif){kind=icon}
![[Archive]](/icons/banner/archiveACT.gif){kind=icon}
![[Search]](/icons/banner/searchACT.gif){kind=icon}
![[Contents]](/icons/banner/tocACT.gif){kind=icon}
|
|
|
|
|
||
Vol. 20, Issue 17, 3888-3895, September 1, 2009
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
*Department of Medicinal Chemistry and Molecular Pharmacology, School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907; Department of Molecular Biology, School of Osteopathic Medicine, University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey, Stratford, NJ 08084; Division of Biological Science, Graduate School of Science, Institute for Advanced Research, Nagoya University, Chikusa-ku, Nagoya 464-8602, Japan; Division of Cell Biology, Graduate School of Medicine, University of the Ryukyus, Nishihara-cho, Okinawa 903-0215, Japan; and ||Howard Hughes Medical Institute and Department of Biological Chemistry, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI 48109
Submitted August 13, 2008;
Revised June 17, 2008;
Accepted June 23, 2009
Monitoring Editor: William P. Tansey
 |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
 TOP ABSTRACT INTRODUCTIONMATERIALS AND METHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONREFERENCES |
|---|
|
INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
TOPABSTRACTINTRODUCTIONMATERIALS AND METHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONREFERENCES |
|---|
, 2003). The MSP signal promotes oocyte maturation and sheath cell contractions. The oocyte then undergoes nuclear envelope breakdown (NEBD) and cortical rearrangement, and signals sheath cells via the epidermal growth factor-like ligand, LIN-3, to increase the strength and frequency of their contractions. When these contractions are coupled with dilation of the distal spermathecal valve, the mature oocyte is ovulated into the spermatheca for fertilization (McCarter et al., 1997, 1999). After fertilization, the spermatheca-uterine valve dilates so that the new egg can pass into the uterus (Figure 1A).
|
; Bui and Sternberg, 2002; Kariya et al., 2004; Yin et al., 2004) (Figure 1B). IP3 is produced in sheath cells and spermathecal cells by the catalytic activity of the phospholipase C (PLC) enzymes PLC-3, PLC-1, or both. Levels of IP3 can be reduced by IP3 kinase let-23 fertility effector/regulator (LFE-2) or type I polyphosphate 5-phosphatase (IPP-5) (Clandinin et al., 1998; Bui and Sternberg, 2002; Kariya et al., 2004; Yin et al., 2004). Thus, loss-of-function mutations in lfe-2 or ipp-5 increase IP3 concentration and suppress the ovulation defect caused by lin-3 mutations (Clandinin et al., 1998; Bui and Sternberg, 2002). In addition, a gain-of-function mutation in itr-1, the IP3 receptor, sensitizes it to Ca2+, which also rescues the ovulation defects caused by mutants for the LIN-3 signal (Clandinin et al., 1998).
Fos and Jun are members of the activator protein-1 (AP-1) family, which constitutes an important subset of basic region leucine zipper (bZIP) transcription factors (Karin et al., 1997; Wagner, 2001). AP-1 proteins function as homodimers or heterodimers that bind DNA and regulate transcription of target genes. Genetic and biochemical studies have demonstrated that AP-1 proteins are critical regulators of many cellular and developmental processes, including growth, differentiation, apoptosis, and stress responses (Karin et al., 1997).
Recent studies in C. elegans showed that FOS-1A, one of the two isoforms of the C. elegans Fos homologue, regulates the development of the reproductive system, including anchor cell invasion and development of the uterus (Sherwood et al., 2005; Oommen and Newman, 2007). However, knockdown of fos-1 by RNA interference (RNAi) or deletion of fos-1 also causes sterility (Oommen and Newman, 2007), which implies that fos-1 plays additional roles in reproduction. Here, we show that FOS-1B regulates spermathecal valve dilation by controlling plc-1 expression (Figure 1B). We also demonstrate that the C. elegans Jun homologue participates in this process. However, JUN-1 has a milder phenotype, and genetic evidence suggests that its role in ovulation is influenced by mutations in genes involved in the RNAi pathway and chromatin remodeling.
|
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
TOPABSTRACTINTRODUCTIONMATERIALS AND METHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONREFERENCES |
|---|
Feeding RNAi
cDNAs encoding the bZIP region of fos-1 and jun-1, full-length fog-3, exons 1 through 4 of unc-112, exons 1-7 of eri-1a, and the first 1 kb of the 5' end of lin-15B were cloned into the feeding RNAi vector pPD129.36 (Timmons and Fire, 1998). Feeding RNAi was performed as described previously (Kamath et al., 2001). In brief, HT115(DE3) E. coli were transformed with plasmid and grown 8 h at 37°C in Luria Broth containing ampicillin (100 µg/ml) and tetracycline (15 µg/ml). RNAi plates containing ampicillin (50 µg/ml), tetracycline (15 µg/ml), and isopropyl β-D-thiogalactoside (1 mM) were seeded with 200 µl of bacteria and incubated at 37°C overnight. Adult N2 worms were added and allowed to lay eggs for 48 h at 20°C. Phenotypes of F1 progeny were scored after an additional 24–48 h. eri-1;lin-15B worms were allowed to lay eggs for 72 h or were not removed until analysis of offspring.
Genetic Interactions between jun-1 and eri-1 or lin-15B
The homozygous double mutant jun-1(gk557);lin-15B(n744) X was made and confirmed by genotyping with polymerase chain reaction (PCR). RNAi in the background of various strains was performed as described above. Sterility was defined as the absence of fertilized eggs in the uterus.
4,6-Diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) Staining
Fixation and staining were performed as described previously (Francis et al., 1995), with slight modifications. In brief, a 60-mm plate of worms was rinsed twice with M9 buffer and then fixed in 3% fresh paraformaldehyde for 1 h. After two washes with phosphate-buffered saline containing 0.1% Tween 20 (PBST), worms were fixed in cold methanol at –20°C for 10 min. After two additional PBST washes, samples were incubated with 100 ng/ml DAPI in PBST for 10 min, washed, and mounted on slides. Images were captured using a Photometrics CoolSNAP ES digital camera (Roper Scientific, Tucson, AZ) controlled by MetaMorph version 6.2 software (Molecular Devices, Sunnyvale, CA) by using DAPI filters from Chroma Technology (Brattleboro, VT).
Time-Lapse Analysis of First Ovulations
Sheath cell contractions and spermathecal valve dilation studies were performed as described previously (Yin et al., 2004). In brief, vector control or RNAi-treated adult worms were anesthetized in tricaine (0.1%) and tetramisole (0.01%) in M9 for 30–50 min. Worms were examined as described above, and images were acquired once per second for up to 45 min total. Time zero for each image was set to the completion of entry of the oocyte into the spermatheca. Ovulatory contractions consisted of the average contractions per minute of the three minutes preceding entry of the oocyte (–3 to –1). Basal contractions were averaged from 10 to 5 min before ovulation (–10 to –5). For fos-1(RNAi) worms, ovulatory contractions are maximal sheath contractions at the time of oocyte maturation, as evidenced by NEBD and cortical rearrangement. This "rounding" effect is consistent with that seen in the –3 to –1 time point for vector-treated worms. Contractions in each one minute time frame were counted at least three times and averaged.
Effect of fos-1 and jun-1 RNAi on plc-1:: gfp Expression in the Spermatheca
RNAi was performed as described above using the transgenic line expressing a plc-1::gfp reporter as described previously (Kariya et al., 2004). To quantify fluorescence intensity in the spermatheca of young adult F1 worms, regions of interest (average, 11.4) were selected in each spermatheca, and the average fluorescence intensity was calculated (average, 7.2 spermathecae per RNAi treatment) using microscopy setup described above with green fluorescent protein (GFP) filters. A Student's t test was used to compare average fluorescence intensities between samples and to determine statistical significance.
Isolation of fos-1(km30) Deletion Mutant
The deletion mutant fos-1(km30) was generated by TMP/UV (Gengyo-Ando and Mitani, 2000) and isolated using sib-selection. Screening was performed using gene-specific primers as follows: external left, 5'-GTAAGCCAAATAGGAAAATTACGGT-3'; external right, 5'-CTCGATTTTTGGAATCTGAAGTAAA-3'; internal left, 5'-TAATTTACATTAGGTTTGCCGACAT-3'; and internal right, 5'-AAATGAATGTACTCACTTTGCGTTC-3'.
Direct sequencing of the PCR products verified the deleted region. These deletion mutants were backcrossed more than twice to animals of a wild-type N2 background.
Expression Analysis of fos-1b and jun-1 Isoforms
Genomic DNA upstream of the transcriptional start sites of fos-1b (3.4 kb), jun-1abc (296 base pairs), jun-1d (296 base pairs), jun-1e (222 base pairs), and jun-1f (444 base pairs) were cloned into pPD95.70 (Fire lab C. elegans Vector Kit 1995 [www.addgene.org]). At least three independent transgenic lines were obtained following injection of each plasmid (10 ng/µl) and the rol-6(su1006) (100 ng/µl) marker. Observation of GFP expression and image acquisition were performed as described above.
Luciferase Reporter Gene Assay
Reporter assays were carried out in COS-1 cells essentially the same as described previously (Liu et al., 2006), by using 0.5 µg of plasmid encoding FOS-1B, JUN-1A, and/or JUN-1D, and assayed for luciferase activity 24 h after transfection. Statistical analysis of activation due to FOS-1B, JUN-1A, or both was performed using an ANOVA. Inhibition of FOS-1B and JUN-1A transactivation by JUN-1D also was analyzed using a two-way ANOVA.
Accession Numbers
National Center for Biotechnology Information accession numbers for cDNA sequences of jun-1a-f isoforms are EU553920, EU553921, EU553922, EU553923, EU553924, and EU553925, respectively.
fos-1 RNAi Phenotypes Rescued by PLC-1 Overexpression
Transgenic lines expressing a previously isolated PLC-1 (Shibatohge et al., 1998) driven under the heat shock promoter hsp-16.41 were constructed. The expressed PLC-1 protein (residues 88–1853) contains intact X, Y, C2, RA1, and RA2 domains but lacks the N-terminal 87 residues. Rescue experiments were performed exactly the same as the RNAi experiments except that when F1 worms reached the larval stage 4, they were heat shocked at 33°C for 2 h to induce the expression of PLC-1. A second 30-min heat shock was performed 12 h later, followed by phenotypic analysis. The endomitotic oocytes (Emo) phenotype was defined as the accumulation of endomitotic oocytes in the proximal gonad by differential interference contrast (DIC) microscopy and confirmed by DAPI staining. Any worm showing Emo in one or both of the two proximal gonads was scored as Emo.
|
RESULTS |
|---|
|
TOPABSTRACTINTRODUCTIONMATERIALS AND METHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONREFERENCES |
|---|
; Timmons et al., 2001). To knock down both isoforms of fos-1, we targeted the shared bZIP-encoding region. Knockdown of fos-1 resulted in F1 progeny with several phenotypes, including sterility (95.1%), a protruding vulva (13.8%), and exploded through the vulva (4.6%) (Table 1). These observations are consistent with results from several genome-wide RNAi screens and the analysis of fos-1(ar105), an allele that deletes only fos-1a (Kamath et al., 2003; Simmer et al., 2003; Rual et al., 2004; Sherwood et al., 2005; Oommen and Newman, 2007).
|
; Shyu et al., 2008). To see whether C. elegans jun-1 has the same role as fos-1, we performed RNAi in the wild type and failed to observe any phenotype in the F1 progeny, possibly because jun-1 mRNA was not eliminated (unpublished observations). Thus, we performed similar experiments in two RNAi-sensitive strains. In rrf-3(pk1426); jun-1(RNAi) worms, we observed an egg-laying phenotype and some distal tip cell migration defects, but minimal sterility. However, in jun-1(RNAi); eri-1(mg366); lin-15B(n744) worms, we saw phenotypes similar to those caused by fos-1 RNAi (Table 1). Together, these results show that fos-1 and jun-1 have multiple, overlapping functions in the reproductive system.
fos-1 and jun-1 Are Required for Ovulation
The high penetrance of the sterile phenotype in fos-1(RNAi) and jun-1(RNAi); eri-1(mg366); lin-15B(n744) worms prompted us to ask how C. elegans AP-1 proteins promote fertility. When we examined gonad morphology and germ cell development in younger animals, we found that fos-1(RNAi) worms seemed normal before ovulation began and did not show an obvious oogenesis defect, which is different from fos-1 deletion alleles fos-1(ar105) and fos-1(km30) (see the following sections for details). However, the oocytes failed to enter the spermatheca in almost all of the young adults examined (93%; n = 79). Consequently, these worms accumulated Emo in the proximal gonad (Figure 2, C and D), a phenomenon that occurs when oocytes mature but are not ovulated or fertilized (Iwasaki et al., 1996). We observed a similar Emo phenotype in jun-1(RNAi); eri-1(mg366); lin-15B(n744) worms (Figure 2, G and H).
|
). We found that rrf-1(pk1417); fos-1(RNAi) worms showed much less sterility than fos-1(RNAi) in N2 worms (Table 1). This result supports the hypothesis that fos-1 acts in the soma to regulate ovulation. By contrast, sterility resulting from the knockdown of fog-3, a gene necessary for spermatogenesis (Ellis and Kimble, 1995) was not rescued in rrf-1(pk1417) worms. Thus, RNA interference is still functional in the germ line of this strain (Table 1).
FOS-1 Controls the Dilation of the Distal Spermathecal Valve
The somatic tissues involved in ovulation include both sheath cells and the distal spermatheca (McCarter et al., 1997, 1999). To see whether the defects in the fos-1(RNAi) worms were due to inadequate sheath cell contractions or to improper dilation of the distal spermathecal valve, we recorded these processes in living animals. Because endomitotic oocytes trapped in the proximal gonad obscure sheath cell contractions (Yin et al., 2004), we examined only the first ovulation in fos-1(RNAi) worms, using time-lapse microscopy (Supplemental Figure 1A and Supplemental Video 1). This time-lapse imaging also allowed the observation of other critical steps in ovulation, including oocyte maturation (as characterized by nuclear envelope breakdown and cortical rearrangement) and spermathecal valve dilation. In control worms, ovulations progressed normally (n = 5 animals), leading to the movement of oocytes into the spermatheca and the release of fertilized eggs into the uterus. However, all oocytes in fos-1(RNAi) worms failed to enter the spermatheca, even though oocyte maturation occurred normally (n = 4 animals; Supplemental Video 1). Quantification of sheath cell contractions indicated that there was only a slight difference in basal and ovulatory sheath cell contractions in fos-1(RNAi) worms when compared with vector controls (Supplemental Figure 1B). Because even untreated eri-1(mg366); lin-15B(n744) animals have reduced brood sizes and some ovulation defects (unpublished observations), we did not record ovulations in jun-1(RNAi); eri-1(mg366); lin-15B(n744) worms.
To see whether the lack of spermathecal valve dilation in fos-1(RNAi) worms was due to defects in spermathecal development, we performed fos-1 RNAi in a strain that expresses GFP in spermathecal cells (Mohler et al., 1998; Michaux et al., 2001). Knockdown of fos-1 in these animals did not cause detectable changes in the expression or localization of the ajm-1::gfp reporter in the spermatheca (data not shown). These results suggest that the primary defect in fos-1 and jun-1 RNAi-treated worms is a failure in distal spermathecal valve dilation.
fos-1 and jun-1 Deletion Mutants Exhibit Multiple Defects in the Reproductive System
To confirm the RNAi results, we isolated fos-1(km30), which deletes an exon encoding part of the bZIP region, which is shared by FOS-1A and FOS-1B. The fos-1(km30) homozygotes showed severe defects in oocyte development, which prevented us from analyzing ovulation. However, fos-1(km30) heterozygotes displayed several phenotypes associated with reproduction, including sterility (11%), a protruding vulva (8%), a ruptured gonad (3%), the presence of debris or torn oocytes in the spermatheca (28%) and uterus (22%), and unfertilized oocytes in the uterus (11%) (n = 36). Thus, fos-1 regulates many developmental and physiological processes in the reproductive system.
We also studied jun-1(gk557), which deletes the bZIP-coding region (C. elegans Gene Knockout Consortium). Reverse transcription-PCR analyses verified the absence of all isoforms (data not shown). Although jun-1(gk557) animals showed multiple defects in the reproductive system and had a reduced brood size, we only observed 5.1% sterility (Supplemental Table 2). Thus, jun-1 and fos-1 have overlapping phenotypes, but they are not identical in their effects on reproduction.
The ovulation defect we observed in jun-1(RNAi); eri-1(mg366); lin-15B(n744) worms might have been due to two distinct causes—the eri-1(mg366); lin-15B(n744) strain might enhance the effectiveness of RNAi against jun-1 or eri-1 and lin-15B might interact genetically with jun-1 to regulate ovulation. Thus, we built jun-1(gk557); lin-15B(n744) double mutants for analysis. Because of decreased fertility, we could not build an eri-1; lin-15b; jun-1 triple mutant. However, we did find that jun-1(gk557); lin-15B(n744) double mutants showed a high percentage of the Emo phenotype compared with either jun-1(gk557) or lin-15B(n744) single mutants (Supplemental Table 3). Thus, jun-1 and lin-15B are partially redundant for the control of ovulation. In addition, we performed RNAi in jun-1(gk557) animals and observed that knockdown of eri-1, lin-15B, or both genes increased sterility (Supplemental Table 4). Together, these results strongly suggest that jun-1 has multiple roles in the reproductive system. Furthermore, the regulation of ovulation by jun-1 is influenced by the activities of eri-1 and lin-15B.
fos-1 Genetically Interacts with Genes in the IP3 Signaling Pathway
Genetic analysis demonstrated that the IP3 signaling pathway is responsible for sheath cell contractions, distal spermathecal valve dilation, and spermatheca-uterine valve dilation through IP3-induced calcium release (Clandinin et al., 1998; Bui and Sternberg, 2002; Kariya et al., 2004; Yin et al., 2004). Thus, we determined whether increased IP3 levels could rescue the sterility induced by fos-1 RNAi. We used three mutants that suppress the ovulation defects of lin-3 mutants—a gain-of-function mutation in itr-1, and loss-of-function mutations in either ipp-5 or lfe-2. We found that ipp-5(sy605) suppressed the sterility induced by fos-1 RNAi, although neither lfe-2(sy326) nor itr-1(sy327) affected the phenotype. To exclude the possibility that the ipp-5 mutation affects RNA interference, we performed RNAi against unc-112, a gene required for the assembly of muscle dense bodies and normal movement (Rogalski et al., 2000). We observed comparable levels of uncoordinated animals when RNAi was performed in wild type or ipp-5(sy605) worms (Table 2). Thus, the RNAi machinery is not compromised in ipp-5 mutants, which implies that the defect in the dilation of the distal spermathecal valve in fos-1(RNAi) worms is due to decreased levels of IP3 in the spermatheca.
|
; Gower et al., 2001; Bui and Sternberg, 2002; Kariya et al., 2004; Yin et al., 2004). RNA interference against fos-1 reduced the expression of plc-1::gfp in the spermatheca to 8.0% of the vector control, and RNA interference against jun-1 reduced the expression of plc-1::gfp to 82.3% (Figure 3). This slight reduction of plc-1::gfp expression in the jun-1(RNAi) worms mirrors the low level of sterility found in these animals. However, plc-1::gfp expression in other tissues including the vulva, head, and tail seemed unaltered in all of these experiments. Furthermore, we saw no obvious changes in the expression of plc-3::gfp, ipp-5::gfp or itr-1::gfp in the spermatheca of fos-1(RNAi) or jun-1(RNAi) worms (unpublished observations). These results suggest that fos-1 and jun-1 regulate plc-1 expression in the spermatheca.
|
|
), and four isoforms of jun-1 were predicted (www.wormbase.org). To confirm these isoforms, we performed 5' and 3' rapid amplification of cDNA ends. These studies confirmed the expression of fos-1a and fos-1b and identified six isoforms of jun-1, which all share a common bZIP region (Supplemental Figure 2).
fos-1a is expressed in the anchor cell and uterus throughout gonadogenesis and regulates both anchor cell invasion and uterine development (Rogalski et al., 2000; Oommen and Newman, 2007). Although fos-1b is expressed in several tissues, its function had been unknown (Sherwood et al., 2005). To see whether fos-1b was expressed in the spermatheca, we used 3.4 kb of genomic DNA upstream of its transcriptional start site to build a GFP reporter plasmid. Transgenic worms carrying this plasmid expressed GFP in the spermatheca (Figure 4A).
|
The expression of multiple jun-1 isoforms in the spermatheca suggested that these isoforms might interact to coordinate the transcription of target genes. For example, in mammals, the transcription of AP-1 target genes is subject to negative regulation by some AP-1 proteins that share essentially the same bZIP domain, such as JunB and JunD (Zenz and Wagner, 2006). In C. elegans, JUN-1D is one of three short isoforms that contain the bZIP domain and little else. Because the bZIP domains of JUN-1 and FOS-1 bind the consensus TPA response element (TRE) binding site as heterodimers as well as homodimers (unpublished observations), we examined the transcriptional potential of FOS-1B, JUN-1A, and JUN-1D. To do this, we used luciferase reporter gene assays in COS-1 cells. Although FOS-1B, JUN-1A, or JUN-1D alone showed minimal activation of the reporter gene, coexpression of JUN-1A with FOS-1B significantly activated the AP-1 reporter. However, coexpression of JUN-1D with FOS-1B had no effect (Figure 4B). Instead, coexpression of JUN-1D inhibited activation of the reporter by FOS- 1B/JUN-1A when an equal amount of the plasmid encoding JUN-1D was cotransfected. These results suggest that JUN-1A and JUN-1D exhibit opposite effects on the activation of target genes when they form heterodimers with FOS-1B.
|
DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
TOPABSTRACTINTRODUCTIONMATERIALS AND METHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONREFERENCES |
|---|
; Wagner, 2001). However, the role of AP-1 proteins in the reproductive system remains largely unexplored, due to the lack of appropriate model systems. Our findings that FOS-1 and JUN-1 control spermathecal valve dilation, along with the known role of FOS-1 in anchor cell invasion and cell fate specification in the uterus (Sherwood et al., 2005; Hwang et al., 2007; Oommen and Newman, 2007; Rimann and Hajnal, 2007; Sapir et al., 2007), establish C. elegans as a model for the control of reproduction by AP-1 proteins.
Spermathecal valve dilation is essential for successful ovulation. Genetic analysis showed that it depends on several genes that act in the IP3 signaling pathway to control calcium levels (Clandinin et al., 1998; Bui and Sternberg, 2002; Kariya et al., 2004; Yin et al., 2004). We present several lines of evidence that FOS-1 and JUN-1 regulate plc-1 transcription specifically in the spermatheca. First, fos-1b, jun-1a-c and jun-1d are all coexpressed in the spermatheca, along with plc-1. Second, knockdown of fos-1 or jun-1 decreased expression of a plc-1::gfp reporter in the spermatheca, without affecting its expression in other tissues. Third, the lack of distal spermathecal valve dilation caused by fos-1 RNAi was suppressed by ipp-5(sy605), a mutant allele that increases IP3 levels by inhibiting the metabolism of IP3, but was not suppressed by lfe-2(sy326) or itr-1(sy327). This pattern of suppression is identical to that observed for plc-1 with these mutations (Kariya et al., 2004). Fourth, overexpression of PLC-1 rescued the Emo phenotype in fos-1(RNAi) worms. Thus, our studies provide a link between fos-1/jun-1 and plc-1 in C. elegans.
Other PLC isozymes in worms have been implicated in the regulation of all three major rhythmic programs—pharyngeal pumping, ovulation and defecation (Kariya et al., 2004; Yin et al., 2004; Espelt et al., 2005; Norman et al., 2005). Thus, it will be interesting to determine whether AP-1 proteins also regulate the transcription of any of these PLC isozymes. In mammals, AP-1 proteins regulate circadian rhythms by controlling the transcription of critical target genes (Kornhauser et al., 1992; Crosio et al., 2000; Hirayama et al., 2005), so the role of AP-1 proteins in rhythmic behaviors might be ancient.
Although we show that fos-1 and jun-1 regulate ovulation via plc-1, there might be additional target genes involved in ovulation. For example, that overexpressing PLC-1 in fos-1(RNAi) worms only partially rescues the ovulation defect and fos-1 RNAi causes a slight reduction in sheath cell contractions could indicate that fos-1 and jun-1 control additional targets. This possibility is supported by the penetrance of the ovulation defect in fos-1(RNAi) worms, which is higher than that in plc-1 deletion mutants (Kariya et al., 2004).
Chromatin Remodeling Influences Transcriptional Regulation of AP-1 Target Genes
In C. elegans, three classes of genes can interact to create a synthetic multivulval (SynMuv) phenotype (Fay and Yochem, 2007). Genetic and biochemical evidence suggests that these genes influence chromatin remodeling (Thomas et al., 2003; Ceol and Horvitz, 2004; Poulin et al., 2005; Cui et al., 2006; Harrison et al., 2006). It is interesting that jun-1(RNAi) animals only showed an ovulation defect in the strain eri-1(mg366); lin-15B(n744). Although eri-1 is an RNAse that influences RNA interference, lin-15B is a gene with SynMuvB activity (Wang et al., 2005). Furthermore, we found that a lin-15B mutation, n744, was sufficient for this interaction with jun-1. Finally, a general RNAi screen identified 57 genes, including jun-1, that interact with SynMuv genes like lin-15B, lin-35 and lin-37 (Ceron et al., 2007). Thus, a complex regulatory mechanism involving chromatin remodeling might influence the transcriptional regulation of plc-1 by jun-1.
Knocking down fos-1 in the wild type is sufficient to down-regulate plc-1 transcription and to cause an ovulation defect, but the same is not true for jun-1. However, several observations support an alternative model. First, several JUN-1 isoforms are expressed in the spermatheca. Second, FOS-1B/JUN-1A positively regulates a reporter gene in tissue culture, but JUN-1D antagonizes this interaction. Thus, FOS-1/JUN-1A might promote transcription of plc-1 in the spermatheca, and JUN-1D might block transcription. If correct, this model would explain the weak phenotype of jun-1 deletion mutants, since both its positive and negative activities would be eliminated. In addition, this model implies that the enhancement of the ovulation defect seen in jun-1(mg366); lin-15B(n744) mutants could have been caused by a differential effect of chromatin alterations on the activity of the two JUN-1 isoforms. This inference is supported by the observation that knockdown of jun-1 in the background of lin-35 or lin-37 mutations also causes sterility (Ceron et al., 2007). Further analysis of the interactions between jun-1 and other SynMuv genes could provide insight into the transcriptional regulation of AP-1 target genes via chromatin remodeling.
AP-1 Dimerization in Transcriptional Regulation of Target Genes
AP-1 has been extensively studied over the past two decades. One challenge in the field is to assign specific cellular or developmental roles to individual AP-1 dimers. This has been impeded by the presence of multiple AP-1 proteins in mammals, allowing potential dimerization of any single AP-1 protein with several partners. These complexities contribute to functional complementation when only a single AP-1 gene is knocked out (Jochum et al., 2001). By contrast, model organisms with reduced genetic redundancy allow functional analysis of AP-1 dimers and their corresponding target genes, as shown by studies in Drosophila (Kockel et al., 2001; Ciapponi and Bohmann, 2002).
At least two different isoforms, jun-1a and jun-1d, are coexpressed with fos-1b in the spermatheca. Our proposal that multiple AP-1 dimers with distinct transcriptional potential could be formed in the spermatheca is based on this fact, and on the ability of the bZIP domains of FOS-1 and JUN-1 to form homodimers and heterodimers (unpublished observations). Furthermore, it is supported by the observation that JUN-1A and JUN-1D play opposite roles in activating an AP-1 reporter gene. We have identified four potential TRE sites in the promoter used for the plc-1::gfp reporter strain (unpublished observations). Thus, future characterization of the plc-1 promoter and its regulation by different AP-1 proteins should show how these AP-1 proteins coordinate the transcription of plc-1 in the spermatheca and could provide a model system for studying the interaction of different AP-1dimers on transcription.
|
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
|
Footnotes |
|---|
Address correspondence to: Chang-Deng Hu (cdhu{at}pharmacy.purdue.edu)
|
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
TOPABSTRACTINTRODUCTIONMATERIALS AND METHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONREFERENCES |
|---|
Ceol, C. J., and Horvitz, H. R. (2004). A new class of C. elegans synMuv genes implicates a Tip60/NuA4-like HAT complex as a negative regulator of Ras signaling. Dev. Cell 6, 563–576.[CrossRef][Medline]
Ceron, J., Rual, J. F., Chandra, A., Dupuy, D., Vidal, M., and van den Heuvel, S. (2007). Large-scale RNAi screens identify novel genes that interact with the C. elegans retinoblastoma pathway as well as splicing-related components with synMuv B activity. BMC Dev. Biol 7, 30.[CrossRef][Medline]
Ciapponi, L., and Bohmann, D. (2002). An essential function of AP-1 heterodimers in Drosophila development. Mech. Dev 115, 35–40.[CrossRef][Medline]
Clandinin, T. R., DeModena, J. A., and Sternberg, P. W. (1998). Inositol trisphosphate mediates a RAS-independent response to LET-23 receptor tyrosine kinase activation in C. elegans. Cell 92, 523–533.[CrossRef][Medline]
Crosio, C., Cermakian, N., Allis, C. D., and Sassone-Corsi, P. (2000). Light induces chromatin modification in cells of the mammalian circadian clock. Nat. Neurosci 3, 1241–1247.[CrossRef][Medline]
Cui, M., Kim, E. B., and Han, M. (2006). Diverse chromatin remodeling genes antagonize the Rb-involved SynMuv pathways in C. elegans. PLoS Genet 2, e74.[CrossRef][Medline]
Ellis, R. E., and Kimble, J. (1995). The fog-3 gene and regulation of cell fate in the germ line of Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics 139, 561–577.[Abstract]
Espelt, M. V., Estevez, A. Y., Yin, X., and Strange, K. (2005). Oscillatory Ca2+ signaling in the isolated Caenorhabditis elegans intestine: role of the inositol-1,4,5-trisphosphate receptor and phospholipases C beta and gamma. J. Gen. Physiol 126, 379–392.
Fay, D. S., and Yochem, J. (2007). The SynMuv genes of Caenorhabditis elegans in vulval development and beyond. Dev. Biol 306, 1–9.[CrossRef][Medline]
Francis, R., Barton, M. K., Kimble, J., and Schedl, T. (1995). gld-1, a tumor suppressor gene required for oocyte development in Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics 139, 579–606.[Abstract]
Gengyo-Ando, K., and Mitani, S. (2000). Characterization of mutations induced by ethyl methanesulfonate, UV, and trimethylpsoralen in the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun 269, 64–69.[CrossRef][Medline]
Gower, N. J., Temple, G. R., Schein, J. E., Marra, M., Walker, D. S., and Baylis, H. A. (2001). Dissection of the promoter region of the inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate receptor gene, itr-1, in C. elegans: a molecular basis for cell-specific expression of IP3R isoforms. J. Mol. Biol 306, 145–157.[CrossRef][Medline]
Harrison, M. M., Ceol, C. J., Lu, X., and Horvitz, H. R. (2006). Some C. elegans class B synthetic multivulva proteins encode a conserved LIN-35 Rb-containing complex distinct from a NuRD-like complex. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 103, 16782–16787.
Hiatt, S. M., Shyu, Y. J., Duren, H. M., and Hu, C. D. (2008). Bimolecular fluorescence complementation (BiFC) analysis of protein interactions in Caenorhabditis elegans. Methods 45, 185–191.[CrossRef][Medline]
Hirayama, J., Cardone, L., Doi, M., and Sassone-Corsi, P. (2005). Common pathways in circadian and cell cycle clocks: light-dependent activation of Fos/AP-1 in zebrafish controls CRY-1a and WEE-1. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102, 10194–10199.
Hwang, B. J., Meruelo, A. D., and Sternberg, P. W. (2007). C. elegans EVI1 proto-oncogene, EGL-43, is necessary for Notch-mediated cell fate specification and regulates cell invasion. Development 134, 669–679.
Iwasaki, K., McCarter, J., Francis, R., and Schedl, T. (1996). emo-1, a Caenorhabditis elegans Sec61p gamma homologue, is required for oocyte development and ovulation. J. Cell Biol 134, 699–714.
Jochum, W., Passegue, E., and Wagner, E. F. (2001). AP-1 in mouse development and tumorigenesis. Oncogene 20, 2401–2412.[CrossRef][Medline]
Kamath, R. S. et al. (2003). Systematic functional analysis of the Caenorhabditis elegans genome using RNAi. Nature 421, 231–237.[CrossRef][Medline]
Kamath, R. S., Martinez-Campos, M., Zipperlen, P., Fraser, A. G., and Ahringer, J. (2001). Effectiveness of specific RNA-mediated interference through ingested double-stranded RNA in Caenorhabditis elegans. Genome Biol 2, RESEARCH0002.[Medline]
Karin, M., Liu, Z., and Zandi, E. (1997). AP-1 function and regulation. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol 9, 240–246.[CrossRef][Medline]
Kariya, K., Bui, Y. K., Gao, X., Sternberg, P. W., and Kataoka, T. (2004). Phospholipase C epsilon regulates ovulation in Caenorhabditis elegans. Dev. Biol 274, 201–210.[CrossRef][Medline]
Kockel, L., Homsy, J. G., and Bohmann, D. (2001). Drosophila AP-1, lessons from an invertebrate. Oncogene 20, 2347–2364.[CrossRef][Medline]
Kornhauser, J. M., Nelson, D. E., Mayo, K. E., and Takahashi, J. S. (1992). Regulation of jun-B messenger RNA and AP-1 activity by light and a circadian clock. Science 255, 1581–1584.
Liu, H., Deng, X., Shyu, Y. J., Li, J. J., Taparowsky, E. J., and Hu, C. D. (2006). Mutual regulation of c-Jun and ATF2 by transcriptional activation and subcellular localization. EMBO J 25, 1058–1069.[CrossRef][Medline]
McCarter, J., Bartlett, B., Dang, T., and Schedl, T. (1997). Soma-germ cell interactions in Caenorhabditis elegans: multiple events of hermaphrodite germline development require the somatic sheath and spermathecal lineages. Dev. Biol 181, 121–143.[CrossRef][Medline]
McCarter, J., Bartlett, B., Dang, T., and Schedl, T. (1999). On the control of oocyte meiotic maturation and ovulation in Caenorhabditis elegans. Dev. Biol 205, 111–128.[CrossRef][Medline]
Michaux, G., Legouis, R., and Labouesse, M. (2001). Epithelial biology: lessons from Caenorhabditis elegans. Gene 277, 83–100.[CrossRef][Medline]
Miller, M. A., Nguyen, V. Q., Lee, M. H., Kosinski, M., Schedl, T., Caprioli, R. M., and Greenstein, D. (2001). A sperm cytoskeletal protein that signals oocyte meiotic maturation and ovulation. Science 291, 2144–2147.
Miller, M. A., Ruest, P. J., Kosinski, M., Hanks, S. K., and Greenstein, D. (2003). An Eph receptor sperm-sensing control mechanism for oocyte meiotic maturation in Caenorhabditis elegans. Genes Dev 17, 187–200.
Mohler, W. A., Simske, J. S., Williams-Masson, E. M., Hardin, J. D., and White, J. G. (1998). Dynamics and ultrastructure of developmental cell fusions in the Caenorhabditis elegans hypodermis. Curr. Biol 8, 1087–1090.[CrossRef][Medline]
Norman, K. R., Fazzio, R. T., Mellem, J. E., Espelt, M. V., Strange, K., Beckerle, M. C., and Maricq, A. V. (2005). The Rho/Rac-family guanine nucleotide exchange factor VAV-1 regulates rhythmic behaviors in C. elegans. Cell 123, 119–132.[CrossRef][Medline]
Oommen, K. S., and Newman, A. P. (2007). Co-regulation by Notch and Fos is required for cell fate specification of intermediate precursors during C. elegans uterine development. Development 134, 3999–4009.
Poulin, G., Dong, Y., Fraser, A. G., Hopper, N. A., and Ahringer, J. (2005). Chromatin regulation and sumoylation in the inhibition of Ras-induced vulval development in Caenorhabditis elegans. EMBO J 24, 2613–2623.[CrossRef][Medline]
Rimann, I., and Hajnal, A. (2007). Regulation of anchor cell invasion and uterine cell fates by the egl-43 Evi-1 proto-oncogene in Caenorhabditis elegans. Dev. Biol 308, 187–195.[CrossRef][Medline]
Rogalski, T. M., Mullen, G. P., Gilbert, M. M., Williams, B. D., and Moerman, D. G. (2000). The UNC-112 gene in Caenorhabditis elegans encodes a novel component of cell-matrix adhesion structures required for integrin localization in the muscle cell membrane. J. Cell Biol 150, 253–264.
Rual, J. F. et al. (2004). Toward improving Caenorhabditis elegans phenome mapping with an ORFeome-based RNAi library. Genome Res 14, 2162–2168.
Sapir, A., Choi, J., Leikina, E., Avinoam, O., Valansi, C., Chernomordik, L. V., Newman, A. P., and Podbilewicz, B. (2007). AFF-1, a FOS-1-regulated fusogen, mediates fusion of the anchor cell in C. elegans. Dev. Cell 12, 683–698.[CrossRef][Medline]
Sherwood, D. R., Butler, J. A., Kramer, J. M., and Sternberg, P. W. (2005). FOS-1 promotes basement-membrane removal during anchor-cell invasion in C. elegans. Cell 121, 951–962.[CrossRef][Medline]
Shibatohge, M., Kariya, K., Liao, Y., Hu, C. D., Watari, Y., Goshima, M., Shima, F., and Kataoka, T. (1998). Identification of PLC210, a Caenorhabditis elegans phospholipase C, as a putative effector of Ras. J. Biol. Chem 273, 6218–6222.
Shyu, Y. J., Hiatt, S. M., Duren, H. M., Ellis, R. E., Kerppola, T. K., and Hu, C. D. (2008). Visualization of protein interactions in living Caenorhabditis elegans using bimolecular fluorescence complementation analysis. Nat. Protoc 3, 588–596.[CrossRef][Medline]
Sijen, T., Fleenor, J., Simmer, F., Thijssen, K. L., Parrish, S., Timmons, L., Plasterk, R. H., and Fire, A. (2001). On the role of RNA amplification in dsRNA-triggered gene silencing. Cell 107, 465–476.[CrossRef][Medline]
Simmer, F., Moorman, C., Van Der Linden, A. M., Kuijk, E., Van Den Berghe, P. V., Kamath, R., Fraser, A. G., Ahringer, J., and Plasterk, R. H. (2003). Genome-Wide RNAi of C. elegans Using the Hypersensitive rrf-3 Strain Reveals Novel Gene Functions. PLoS Biol 1, E12.[Medline]
Thomas, J. H., Ceol, C. J., Schwartz, H. T., and Horvitz, H. R. (2003). New genes that interact with lin-35 Rb to negatively regulate the let-60 ras pathway in Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics 164, 135–151.
Timmons, L., Court, D. L., and Fire, A. (2001). Ingestion of bacterially expressed dsRNAs can produce specific and potent genetic interference in Caenorhabditis elegans. Gene 263, 103–112.[CrossRef][Medline]
Timmons, L., and Fire, A. (1998). Specific interference by ingested dsRNA. Nature 395, 854.[CrossRef][Medline]
Wagner, E. F. (2001). AP-1–Introductory remarks. Oncogene 20, 2334–2335.[CrossRef][Medline]
Wang, D., Kennedy, S., Conte, D., Jr, Kim, J. K., Gabel, H. W., Kamath, R. S., Mello, C. C., and Ruvkun, G. (2005). Somatic misexpression of germline P granules and enhanced RNA interference in retinoblastoma pathway mutants. Nature 436, 593–597.[CrossRef][Medline]
Yin, X., Gower, N. J., Baylis, H. A., and Strange, K. (2004). Inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate signaling regulates rhythmic contractile activity of myoepithelial sheath cells in Caenorhabditis elegans. Mol. Biol. Cell 15, 3938–3949.
Zenz, R., and Wagner, E. F. (2006). Jun signalling in the epidermis: from developmental defects to psoriasis and skin tumors. Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol 38, 1043–1049.[CrossRef][Medline]
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
