![]() |
|
|
Vol. 20, Issue 6, 1795-1803, March 15, 2009
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
School of Biomedical Sciences, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, QLD 4072, Australia
Submitted October 21, 2008;
Revised December 19, 2008;
Accepted January 9, 2009
Monitoring Editor: Thomas F.J. Martin
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
F-Actin and Myosin Involvement
Long-standing observations show that cortical F-actin can influence secretory processes (Burgoyne and Cheek, 1987
; Trifaro and Vitale, 1993
), but its exact role is not clear (Muallem et al., 1995
; Malacombe et al., 2006
). For example, it has been suggested that subplasmalemmal F-actin has to be cleared out the way to allow vesicles to dock with the plasma membrane (Giner et al., 2005). It is also possible that F-actin remodelling in some way moves vesicles from within the cell into a position where they might then fuse with the cell surface membrane (Lang et al., 2000
) or F-actin may form part of the poststimulation recovery of vesicles (Shupliakov et al., 2002
).
The findings of F-actin involvement in secretion further suggest that myosins, a family of molecular motors that bind to actin, may also play a role. There are many classes of mammalian myosins and in conjunction with the F-actin cytoskeleton all use ATP hydrolysis to promote movement or generate force (Hodge and Cope, 2000
). Additional studies imply myosin Va (Varadi et al., 2005
; Desnos et al., 2007
) and myosin VI (Buss et al., 2002
) involvement in vesicle movement, but here we focus on the possible role of myosin 2. There is extensive evidence that myosin 2 plays a role in the secretory processes of a variety of cells, including: mast cells (Choi et al., 1994
; Ludowyke et al., 2006
), natural killer cells (Andzelm et al., 2007
), hippocampal (Ryan, 1999
) and sensory neurons (Mochida et al., 1994
), chromaffin cells (Neco et al., 2004
), β cells (Iida et al., 1997
; Wilson et al., 2001
), exocrine cells (Segawa and Yamashina, 1989
; Torgerson and McNiven, 2000
; Jerdeva et al., 2005
), and oocytes (Becker and Hart, 1999
). However, most of these studies rely on measurement of secretory output and therefore lack evidence to show the site(s) of action of F-actin and myosin 2. Also some of these studies use 2,3-butanedione monoxime, as a nonspecific myosin inhibitor, and the clear and dramatic effects of this drug on cell calcium responses (Turvey et al., 2003
) cloud interpretation of these data.
More recently, the methods that have been developed to resolve the sequential steps of granule fusion and fission have been applied to the study of the regulation of these processes. With these techniques, accumulating evidence indicates a role for F-actin and myosin 2 in regulating the postfusion behavior of vesicles. In eggs and pancreas, F-actin coats individual vesicles immediately postfusion (Valentijn et al., 2000
; Sokac et al., 2003
, Turvey and Thorn 2004
, Nemoto et al., 2004
; Yu and Bement, 2007
). In the pancreas, eggs, and chromaffin cells, pharmacological block of actin polymerization influences postfusion vesicle behavior (Sokac et al., 2003
; Neco et al., 2004
; Nemoto et al., 2004
; Larina et al., 2007
; Yu and Bement 2007
; Doreian et al., 2008
) and vesicle content loss (Felmy, 2007
). Likewise, inhibition of myosin 2 affects postfusion events, slowing the opening of the fusion pore (Neco et al., 2008
; Doreian et al., 2008
) and playing a role in promoting vesicle full fusion (Yu and Bement, 2007
; Doreian et al., 2008
).
Pancreas
Methods developed to visualize single vesicles during the secretory cycle have shown postfusion F-actin coating of zymogen granules (Nemoto et al., 2004
; Turvey and Thorn, 2004
). Treatment with the F-actin depolymerizing agent latrunculin decreases granule lifetimes (Nemoto et al., 2004
) and closes the fusion pore (Larina et al., 2007
). In this article, we show that myosin 2A is located in the apical region and is phosphorylated during cell stimulation. We further show that myosin 2 inhibition does not regulate the number of granule fusion events stimulated by agonist but instead affects the postfusion behavior of the granules, inhibition leading to closure of the fusion pore (here we use the term fusion pore to describe the structural link between the cell membrane and the granule during fusion—some other authors use this term to strictly define the small, nanometer-size pore that forms on initial fusion). Our work is consistent with recent findings in other cell types (Yu and Bement, 2007
; Doreian et al., 2008
; Neco et al., 2008
) and points to myosin 2 as a key player in what is likely to be the complex regulation of postfusion granule behavior that may be important in regulating the release of vesicle content.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Confocal Imaging
Fixed specimens were imaged using a Zeiss LSM 510 Axioscope confocal laser scanning microscope, with a 63x objective lens (numerical aperture [NA] 1.3), and an optical slice depth of
1 µm. Images were collected with the appropriate filters and captured in sequential tracks to minimize cross-talk to <2%. Fluorescent probes were from Invitrogen (Carlsbad, CA). All other compounds were from (Sigma-Aldrich, Sydney, Australia). All experiments were performed at least three times. We used MetaMorph software (Molecular Devices, Sunnyvale, CA) for analysis of LSM images and Adobe Photoshop (Adobe Systems, Mountain View, CA) for image processing and presentation.
Indirect Immunofluorescence
Cell preparations were bathed in 2 mg/ml lysine-fixable, fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC) or tetramethylrhodamine ethyl ester (TMRE) conjugated 3 kDa dextran dyes (Invitrogen, Molecular Probes), stimulated for 5 min with 10 pM cholecystokinin (CCK), fixed in freshly prepared 3.4% paraformaldehyde in PBS for 30 min, and permeablized with 1% Triton-X 100 in PBS for 30 min. Myosin subtypes were detected using goat anti-myosin 2A or 2B antibodies (Sigma-Aldrich) and visualized with rabbit anti-goat Alexa 633 secondary antibody (Invitrogen, Molecular probes). Phospho-myosin distribution in cells was imaged using rabbit anti-phospho-myosin 2 (Ser19) antibody (Cell Signal Technology), and mouse anti-rabbit Alexa 633. F-actin was visualized in fixed and permeabilized tissue with phalloidin Alexa 633 (Invitrogen, Molecular probes), or TRITC-phalloidin (Sigma-Aldrich).
Western Blotting
Pancreatic tissue fragments were treated with myosin inhibitors for 20 min at room temperature before stimulation with acetylcholine (ACh) 10 µM for 1 min followed by atropine (100 µM). Cells were rapidly frozen in liquid nitrogen 4 min later and lysed by 3 freeze-thaw cycles. For time-course studies, cells were not drug treated, but stimulated with acetylcholine (ACh) and atropine, and harvested at various times after this. The lysate was centrifuged to isolate the cytosolic fraction. Samples were boiled in Laemmli buffer and electrophoresed on Mini-Protean II apparatus (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA) through a 13% polyacrylamide reducing gel before transfer to Hybond-C nitrocellulose membrane (GE Healthcare, Little Chalfont, Buckinghamshire, United Kingdom) by using a Trans Blot semidry transfer cell (Bio-Rad) for Western blotting. The membrane was blocked in 5% bovine serum albumin and then probed with rabbit anti-phospho-myosin 2 antibody, or mouse anti-β-actin as loading control, at 4°C overnight. Bands were detected using anti-rabbit Alexa 680 and anti-mouse Alexa 800 and visualized on an Odyssey 2 fluorescence plate reader (Li-Cor Biosciences, Lincoln, NE). Bands were quantified using MetaMorph and expressed as a ratio of β-actin, and as a percentage of control.
Assessment of Fusion Pore Dynamics (Figure 5 and 6)
Freshly prepared cells were placed on poly-L-lysine-coated coverslips and incubated with lysine-fixable FITC-dextran (2 mg/ml) at 37°C. Lysine-fixable TMRE-dextran (4 mg/ml) was added either along with the FITC-dextran or at various times after the start of the ACh stimulation. After stimulation, cells were fixed in fresh 3.4% paraformaldehyde in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) for 30 min. To determine the TMRE/FITC (red/green) ratio, fluorescence intensity was measured in a region of interest (diameter, 0.5 µm) in granule and luminal areas. The TMRE/FITC ratio in the granules were normalized to the ratios within the adjacent lumens (see Larina et al., 2007
for details). All graphs were produced in Excel (Microsoft, Redmond, WA).
Live-Cell Two-Photon Imaging (Figure 7)
We used a custom-made, video-rate, two-photon microscope using a Sapphire-Ti laser (Thorn et al., 2004
), with a 60x oil immersion objective (NA 1.42; Olympus, Tokyo, Japan), providing an axial resolution (full width, half maximum) of
1 µm. We imaged exocytic events by using sulforhodamine B (SRB, 20 µg ml–1; Sigma-Aldrich) and FITC as a membrane-impermeant fluorescent extracellular markers excited by femtosecond laser pulses at 800 nm, with fluorescence emission detected at 450–510 nm (FITC) and 550–700 nm (SRB).
Images (resolution of 10 pixels/µm; average of 15 video frames) were analyzed with MetaMorph. An epifluorescent mercury light source provided high-intensity light to photobleach the FITC extracellular dye in an
30-µm diameter field at the image plane. Exocytotic event kinetics was measured from regions of interest (0.78 µm2; 100 pixels) over granules. Traces were rejected if extensive movement was observed. All data are shown as mean ± SEM.
Neurite Outgrowth Assay
We tested the efficacy of Y27632 in an independent assay to validate our results on the epithelial cells. Y27632 has been well characterized to stimulate differentiation and neurite outgrowth in PC12 cells (Zhang et al., 2005
). PC12 cells were plated onto six-well plates at 10 cells/well and allowed to adhere. Cells were cultured with 0, 10, 30, or 50 µM Y26732 or 100 ng ml–1 of neurite growth factor for 48 h. Cells were then imaged by light microscopy, and the number of cells with greater than one neurite was counted. Y27632 caused neurite growth in PC12 cells in a dose-related manner, comparable at 50 µM with neurite growth factor (see Supplemental Data).
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
F-Actin and Myosin 2 Play a Postfusion Role during Exocytosis
The exact role of F-actin postfusion is still not clear, but evidence suggests there are two distinct sites of action: one at the fusion pore and the other in coating fused granules. In the first, F-actin dynamics regulate the behavior of the fusion pore. We have directly shown that F-actin disruption with latrunculin closes the fusion pore (Larina et al., 2007
). Consistent with this, Felmy (2007)
shows that the expression of actin and actin associated proteins, expected to affect F-actin dynamics, influence the release of granule content. And finally, granule collapse, presumably reflecting loss of fusion pore integrity can be enhanced by F-actin disruption (Sokac et al., 2003
; Doreian et al., 2008
). The second site of actin involvement leads to the F-actin coating of fused granules in eggs and acinar cells (Segawa and Yamashina, 1989
, Nemoto et al., 2004
; Sokac et al., 2003
; Turvey and Thorn, 2004
). This coating might be specific to these cell types or it might reflect difficulties in visualizing the smaller secretory granules in other cells types. Previous findings show that this coating requires actin nucleation (Sokac et al., 2003
; Nemoto et al., 2004
) and our work, showing myosin 2 activity is not part of the mechanism of F-actin coating of the granule (Figure 8), is consistent with this. The functional significance of F-actin coating is not known (Malacombe et al., 2006
). It is apparently not specifically required to maintain granule integrity because fused granules are still observed after drug treatments that specifically prevent F-actin coating (Nemoto et al., 2004
; Yu and Bement, 2007
). Yu and Bement (2007)
have evidence that it might be part of a contractile process, squeezing content out, an idea first put forward by Segawa and Yamashina (1989)
. Furthermore, F-actin coating might be an early step in the endocytic recovery of granule membrane as suggested from work in neurons (Shupliakov et al., 2002
).
There are some contradictions in this work on F-actin that probably reflect differences in the consequences of drug actions in different cell types, as well as possible different functions for the preexisting cortical F-actin and newly formed F-actin. For example, in some studies treatment with agents to disrupt F-actin formation destabilizes the fused granules as measured by a favoring of granule collapse (Sokac et al., 2004, Doreian et al., 2008
) and an increase in the measured quantal size of granule content release (Doreian et al., 2008
). In contrast, Yu and Bement (2007)
show that mild F-actin disruption (with cytochalasin D) "traps" fused granules at the plasma membrane. Consistent with this, in acinar cells that are known to have a particularly robust preexisting F-actin cytoskeleton, resistant to drug disruption (Turvey et al., 2005
), latrunculin treatment leads to the long-term retention of fused granules (Nemoto et al., 2004
). We might tentatively conclude that treatments that disrupt the preexisting F-actin cytoskeleton destabilize granules leading to collapse, whereas with more subtle treatments, or in cells with a particularly extensive F-actin cortex, granule integrity is maintained but behaviors such as fusion pore opening are affected.
Our data place myosin 2 as necessary for the maintained opening of the fusion pore. This is consistent with other reports of myosin 2 inhibition leading to a slowing of fusion pore expansion (Doreian et al., 2008
; Neco et al., 2008
) and, of course, does not exclude an additional role for myosin in providing a contractile force for expulsion of granule content (Segawa and Yamashina, 1989
; Yu and Bement, 2007
). To maintain fusion pore opening myosin 2 is likely to be part of a machinery that is linked to the pore membrane and linked to the surrounding F-actin cytoskeleton providing forces to pull (or maintain) pore opening.
Other Potential Regulators of the Fusion Pore
The indication that myosin 2 is a regulator of the fusion pore, places it as potential component in a fusion pore macromolecular complex. A range of other factors such as dynamin (Graham et al., 2002
; Tsuboi et al., 2004
), complexin (Archer et al., 2002
), calcium (Alés et al., 1999
; Haller et al., 2001
; Elhamdani et al., 2006
; Llobet et al., 2008
), syntaxin (Wang et al., 2003
), and amphiphysin (Llobet et al., 2008
) have also been shown to affect pore dynamics. Although a coherent view of the composition and regulation of the fusion pore complex has yet to emerge, it is likely, given this diversity of possible control pathways, that its regulation may subserve genuine physiological functions.
Possible Role of Fusion Pore Dynamics in Regulating Granule Content Release
The regulation of granule content release is an exciting possible function for the control of fusion pore behavior. It has been shown that different exogenous content can be differentially released from granules (Michael et al., 2004
; Felmy 2007
). In dense-core granules, ATP content has been shown to be released rapidly and preferentially compared with peptide content (Obermuller et al., 2005
). Bauer et al. (2004)
and Perrais et al. (2004)
show that protein content can be retained after a cycle of fusion and fission and recycled back into the cell. These studies are consistent with either fusion pore size or dynamics regulating content release. Furthermore, Felmy (2007)
shows that molecular weight is not the sole determinant of content release kinetics, indicating that, in addition to pore size and dynamics as potential regulators of release, the time course of intragranule matrix dissociation may also play a role.
Role of F-Actin and Myosin 2 in the Physiology of Secretion in Acinar Cells
Torgerson and McNiven (2000)
originally described a decrease in enzyme secretion from acinar cells treated with myosin inhibitors. Our work now suggests that at least in part this is due to the premature closure of the fusion pore. We might imagine this would have two consequences. First, it could directly limit the release of content from the fused granule. This seems unlikely because we have shown that content release is very rapid, with the majority of content lost within a few seconds (Thorn and Parker, 2005
). Second, and more likely, the closure of the fusion pore could prevent the release of content from secondary granules, fused to the first as a result of compound exocytosis (Nemoto et al., 2001
). In this way, granule content would equilibrate within the fused granules but could not escape to the outside.
| CONCLUSIONS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
Present address: * Princess Alexandra Hospital, Level 4, R Wing, Diamantina Institute, Ipswich Rd., Woolloongabba QLD 4102, Australia. ![]()
Address correspondence to: Peter Thorn (p.thorn{at}uq.edu.au)
Abbreviations used: ACh, acetylcholine; CCK, cholecystokinin; FITC, fluorescein isothiocyanate; MLCK, myosin light chain kinase; TMRE, tertramethylrhodamine ethyl ester; SRB, sulforhodamine B.
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Alés, E., Tabares, L., Poyato, J. M., Valero, V., Lindau, M., and Alvarez de Toledo, G. (1999). High calcium concentrations shift the mode of exocytosis to the kiss-and-run mechanism. Nat Cell Biol 1, 40–44.[CrossRef][Medline]
Amano, M., Ito, M., Kimura, K., Fukata, Y., Chihara, K., Nakano, T., Matsuura, Y., and Kaibuchi, K. (1996). Phosphorylation and activation of myosin by Rho-associated kinase (Rho-kinase). J. Biol. Chem 271, 20246–20249.
Andzelm, M. M., Chen, X., Krewski, K., Orange, J. L., and Strominger, J. L. (2007). Myosin IIA is required for cytolytic granule exocytosis in human NK cells. J. Exp. Med 204, 2285–2291.
Archer, D. A., Graham, M. E., and Burgoyne, R. D. (2002). Complexin regulates the closure of the fusion pore during regulated vesicle exocytosis. J. Biol. Chem 277, 18249–18252.
Bauer, R. A., Overlease, R. L., Lieber, J. L., and Angleson, J. K. (2004). Retention and stimulus-dependent recycling of dense core vesicle content in neuroendocrine cells. J. Cell Sci 117, 2193–2202.
Becker, K. A., and Hart, N. H. (1999). Reorganization of filamentous actin and myosin-II in zebrafish eggs correlates temporally and spatially with cortical granule exocytosis. J. Cell Sci 112, 97–110.[Abstract]
Burgoyne, R. D., and Cheek, T. R. (1987). Reorganization of peripheral actin filaments as a prelude to exocytosis. Biosci. Rep 7, 281–288.[CrossRef][Medline]
Burnham, D. B., Soling, H. -D., and Williams, J. A. (1988). Evaluation of myosin light chain phosphorylation in isolated pancreatic acini. Am. J. Physiol 254, G130–G134.[Medline]
Buss, F., Luzio, J. P., and Kendrick-Jones, J. (2002). Myosin VI, an actin motor for membrane traffic and cell migration. Traffic 3, 851–858.[CrossRef][Medline]
Choi, O. H., Adelstein, R. S., and Beavan, M. A. (1994). Secretion from rat basophilic RBL-2H3 cells is associated with diphosphorylation of myosin light chains by myosin light chain kinase as well as phosphorylation by protein kinase C. J. Biol. Chem 269, 536–541.
Desnos, C., Huet, S., Fanget, I., Chapuis, C., Bottiger, C., Racine, V., Sibarita, B. -B., Henry, J. -P., and Darchen, F. (2007). Myosin Va mediates docking of secretory granules at the plasma membrane. J. Neurosci 27, 10636–10645.
Doreian, B. W., Fulop, T. G., and Smith, C. B. (2008). Myosin II activation and actin reorganization regulate the mode of quantal exocytosis in mouse adrenal chromaffin cells. J. Neurosci 28, 4470–4478.
Elhamdani, A., Azizi, F., and Artalejo, C. R. (2006). Double patch clamp reveals that transient fusion (kiss-and-run) is a major mechanism of secretion in calf adrenal chromaffin cells: high calcium shifts the mechanism from kiss-and-run to complete fusion. J. Neurosci 26, 3030–3036.
Felmy, F. (2007). Modulation of cargo release from dense core granules by size and actin network. Traffic 8, 983–997.[CrossRef][Medline]
Fernandez-Peruchena, C., Navas, S., Montes, M. A., and Alvarez de Toledo, G. (2005). Fusion pore regulation of transmitter release. Brain Res. Rev 49, 406–415.[CrossRef][Medline]
Graham, M. E., O'Callaghan, D. W., McMahon, H. T., and Burgoyne, R. D. (2002). Dynamin-dependent and dynamin-independent processes contribute to the regulation of single vesicle release kinetics and quantal size. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99, 7124–7129.
Haller, T., Dietl, P., Pfaller, K., Frick, M., Mair, N., Paulmichl, M., Hess, M. W., Furst, J., and Maly, K. (2001). Fusion pore expansion is a slow, discontinuous, and Ca2+-dependent process regulating secretion from alveolar type II cells. J. Cell Biol 155, 279–289.
Hodge, T., and Cope, M.J.T.V. (2000). A myosin family tree. J. Cell Sci 113, 3353–3354.
Iida, Y., Senda, T., Matsukawa, Y., Onoda, K., Miyazaki, J. -I., Sakaguchi, H., Nimura, Y., Hidaka, H., and Niki, I. (1997). Mysoin light-chain phosphorylation controls insulin secretion at a proximal step in the secretory cascade. Am. J. Physiol 273, E782–E789.[Medline]
Jerdeva, G. V., Wu, K., Yarber, F. A., Rhodes, C. J., Kalman, D., Schechter, J. E., and Hamm-Alvarez, S. F. (2005). Actin and non-muscle myosin II facilitate apical exocytosis of tear proteins in rabbit lacrimal acinar epithelial cells. J. Cell Sci 118, 4797–4812.
Kovacs, M., Toth, J., Hetenyi, C., Malnasi-Csizmadia, A., and Sellers, J. R. (2004). Mechanism of blebbistatin inhibition of myosin II. J. Biol. Chem 279, 35557–35563.
Larina, O., and Thorn, P. (2005). Ca-dynamics in salivary acinar cells: distinct morphology of the acinar lumen underlies near-synchronouos global Ca responses. J. Cell Sci 118, 4131–4139.
Larina, O., Bhat, P., Pickett, J. A., Launikonis, B. S., Shah, A., Kruger, W. A., Edwardson, J. M., and Thorn, P. (2007). Dynamic regulation of the large exocytic fusion pore in pancreatic acinar cells. Mol. Biol. Cell 18, 3502–3511.
Lang, T., Wacker, I., Wunderlich, I., Rohrbach, A., Giese, G., Soldati, T., and Almers, W. (2000). Role of actin cortex in the subplasmalemmal transport of secretory granules in PC-12 cells. Biophys. J 78, 2863–2877.[Medline]
Llobet, A., Wu, M., and Lagnado, L. (2008). The mouth of a dense-core vesicle opens and closes in a concerted action regulated by calcium and amphiphysin. J. Cell Biol 182, 1017–1028.
Ludowyke, R. I., Elgundi, Z., Kranenburg, T., Stehn, J. R., Schmitz-Peiffer, C., Hughes, W. E., and Biden, T. J. (2006). Phosphorylation of nonmuscle myosin heavy chain IIA on Ser 19 17 is mediated by protein kinase CβII and coincides with the onset of stimulated degranulation of RBL-2H3 mast cells. J. Immun 177, 1492–1499.
Malacombe, M., Bader, M. -F., and Gasman, S. (2006). Exocytosis in neuroendocrine cells: new tasks for actin. Biochem. Biophys. Acta 1763, 1175–1183.[Medline]
Michael, D. J., Geng, X., Cawley, N. X., Loh, Y. P., Rhodes, C. J., Drain, P., and Chow, R. H. (2004). Fluorescent cargo proteins in pancreatic β cells: design determines secretion kinetics at exocytosis. Biophys. J, L03–L04.
Mizuno, N., Naruse, S., Kitagawa, M., Ishiguro, H., and Hayakawa, T. (2000). Effects of an inhibitor of myosin light chain kinase on amylase secretion from rat pancreatic acini. Biochem. Biophys. Acta 269, 792–797.
Mochida, S., Kobayashi, H., Matsuda, Y., Yuda, Y., Muramoto, K., and Nonomura, Y. (1994). Myosin II is involved in transmitter release at synapses formed between rat sympathetic neurons in culture. Neuron 13, 1131–1142.[CrossRef][Medline]
Muallem, S., Kwiatkowska, K., Xu, X., and Yin, H. L. (1995). Actin filament disassembly is a sufficient final trigger for exocytosis in nonexcitable cells. J. Cell Biol 128, 589–598.
Neco, P., Giner, D., Viniegra, S., Borgesi, R., Villarroel, A., and Gutierrez, L. M. (2004). New roles of myosin II during vesicle transport and fusion in chromaffin cells. J. Biol. Chem 279, 27450–27457.
Neco, P., Fernandez-Peruchena, C., Navas, S., Lindau, M., Gutierrez, L. M., Alvarez de Toledo, G., and Ales, E. (2008). Myosin II contributes to fusion pore expansion during exocytosis. J. Biol. Chem 283, 10949–10957.
Nemoto, T., Kimura, R., Ito, K., Tachikawa, A., Miyashita, Y., Iino, M., and Kasai, H. (2001). Sequential-replenishment mechanism of exocytosis in pancreatic acini. Nat. Cell Biol 3, 253–258.[CrossRef][Medline]
Nemoto, T., Kojima, T., Oshima, A., Bito, H., and Kasai, H. (2004). Stabilization of exocytosis by dynamic F-actin coating of zymogen granules in pancreatic acini. J. Biol. Chem 279, 37544–37550.
Obermuller, S., Lindqvist, A., Karanauskaite, J., Galvanovkis, J., Rorsman, P., and Barg, S. (2005). Selective nucleotide-release from dense-core granules in insulin-secreting cells. J. Cell Sci 118, 4271–4282.
Perrais, D., Kleppe, I. C., Taraska, J. W., and Almers, W. (2004). Recapture after exocytosis causes differential retention of protein in granules of bovine chromaffin cells. J. Physiol 560, 413–428.
Rettig, J., and Neher, E. (2002). Emerging roles of presynaptic proteins in Ca-triggered exocytosis. Science 298, 781–785.
Ryan, T. A. (1999). Inhibitors of myosin light chain kinase block synaptic vesicle pool mobilization during action potential firing. J. Neurol 19, 1317–1323.
Segawa, A., and Yamashina, S. (1989). Roles of microfilaments in exocytosis: a new hypothesis. Cell Struct. Funct 14, 531–544.[Medline]
Shupliakov, O., Bloom, O., Gustafsson, J. S., Kjaerulff, O., Low, P., Tomilin, N., Pieribone, V. A., Greengrad, P., and Brodin, L. (2002). Impaired recycling of synaptic vesicles after acute perturbation of the presynaptic actin cytoskeleton. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 99, 14476–14481.
Sokac, A. M., Co, C., Taunton, J., and Bement, W. (2003). CDC42-dependent actin polymerization during compensatory endocytosis in Xenopus eggs. Nat. Cell Biol 5, 727–732.[CrossRef][Medline]
Sudhof, T. C. (2004). The synaptic vesicle cycle. Annu. Rev. Neurol 27, 509–547.[CrossRef]
Thorn, P., and Parker, I. (2005). Two phases of zymogen granule lifetime in mouse pancreas, ghost granules linger after exocytosis of contents. J. Physiol 563, 433–442.
Thorn, P., Fogarty, K. E., and Parker, I. (2004). Zymogen granule exocytosis is characterized by long fusion pore openings and preservation of vesicle lipid identity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 101, 6774–6779.
Thorn, P., Lawrie, A. M., Smith, P. M., Gallacher, D. V., and Petersen, O. H. (1993). Local and global cytosolic Ca2+ oscillations in exocrine cells evoked by agonists and inositol trisphosphate. Cell 74, 661–668.[CrossRef][Medline]
Torgerson, R. R., and McNiven, M. A. (2000). Agonist induced changes in cell shape during regulated secretion in rat pancreatic acini. J. Cell. Physiol 182, 438–447.[CrossRef][Medline]
Trifaro, J. M., and Vitale, M. L. (1993). Cytoskeleton dynamics during neurotransmitter release. Trends Neurosci 16, 466–472.[CrossRef][Medline]
Tsuboi, T., McMahon, H. T., and Rutter, G. A. (2004). Mechanisms of dense core vesicle recapture following "kiss and run" ("cavicapture") exocytosis in insulin-secreting cells. J. Biol. Chem 279, 47115–47124.
Turvey, M. R., Laude, A. J., Ives, O. H., Seager, W. H., Taylor, C. W., and Thorn, P. (2003). Modulation of IP3-sensitive Ca-release by 2,3, butanedione monoxime. Pflugers Arch 445, 614–621.[Medline]
Turvey, M., and Thorn, P. (2004). Lysine-fixable dye tracing of exocytosis shows F-actin coating is a step that follows granule fusion in pancreatic acinar cells. Pflugers Arch 448, 552–555.[Medline]
Turvey, M., Fogarty, K. E., and Thorn, P. (2005). Inositol (1,4,5)-trisphosphate receptor links to filamentous actin are important for generating local Ca2+ signals in pancreatic acinar cells. J. Cell Sci 118, 971–980.
Varadi, A., Tsuboi, T., and Rutter, G. A. (2005). Myosin Va transports dense core secretory vesicles in pancreatic MIN6 β-cells. Mol. Biol. Cell 16, 2670–2680.
Vardjan, N., Stenovec, M., Jorgacevski, J., Kreft, M., and Zorek, R. (2007). Elementary properties of spontaneous fusion of peptidergic vesicles: fusion pore gating. J. Physiol. 585 3, 655–661.
Valentijn, J. A., Valentijn, K., Pastore, L. M., and Jamieson, J. D. (2000). Actin coating of secretory granules during regulated exocytosis correlates with the release of rab3D. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97, 1091–1095.
Wang, C. -T., Lu, J. C., Bai, J., Martin, T.F.J., Chapman, E. R., and Jackson, M. B. (2003). Different domains of synaptotagmin control the choice between kiss-and-run and full fusion. Nature 424, 943–947.[CrossRef][Medline]
Wilson, J. R., Ludowyke, R. I., and Biden, T. J. (2001). A redistribution of actin and myosin IIA accompanies Ca-dependent insulin secretion. FEBS Lett 492, 101–106.[CrossRef][Medline]
Yu, H. -Y., and Bement, W. M. (2007). Multiple myosins are required to coordinate actin assembly with coat compression during compensatory endocytosis. Mol. Biol. Cell 18, 4096–4105.
Zhang, Z., Ottens, A. K., Larner, S. F., Kobeissy, F. H., Williams, M. L., Hayes, R. L., and Wang, K. W. (2005). Direct Rho-associated kinase inhibition induces cofilin dephosphorylation and neurite outgrowth in PC-12 cells. Cell. Mol. Biol. Letts 11, 12–29.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
B. W. Doreian, T. G. Fulop, R. L. Meklemburg, and C. B. Smith Cortical F-Actin, the Exocytic Mode, and Neuropeptide Release in Mouse Chromaffin Cells Is Regulated by Myristoylated Alanine-rich C-Kinase Substrate and Myosin II Mol. Biol. Cell, July 1, 2009; 20(13): 3142 - 3154. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||