|
|
|
|
Vol. 8, Issue 10, 2089-2099, October 1997
and
*Department of Biology,
Bionic Design Group,
| |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Fluorescently labeled myosin moved and accumulated circumferentially in the equatorial region of dividing Dictyostelium cells within a time course of 4 min, followed by contraction of the contractile ring. To investigate the mechanism of this transport process, we have expressed three mutant myosins that cannot hydrolyze ATP in myosin null cells. Immunofluorescence staining showed that these mutant myosins were also correctly transported to the equatorial region, although no contraction followed. The rates of transport, measured using green fluorescent protein-fused myosins, were indistinguishable between wild-type and mutant myosins. These observations demonstrate that myosin is passively transported toward the equatorial region and incorporated into the forming contractile ring without its own motor activity.
| |
INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Cytokinesis of animal and lower eukaryotic amoeba cells is driven
by constriction of the contractile ring. The contractile ring contains
circumferential filaments of conventional myosin, or simply myosin
hereafter, and actin filaments (reviewed by Mabuchi, 1986
). There is
cytological (Mabuchi and Okuno, 1977
) and molecular genetic (De Lozanne
and Spudich, 1987
; Knecht and Loomis, 1987
) evidence that myosin
provides force for constriction of the contractile ring.
The contractile ring is a highly transient structure and its assembly
and disassembly are precisely regulated both spatially and temporally.
Classic cytological studies using dividing eggs have established that
the mitotic spindle ultimately determines the position of the
contractile ring (reviewed by Mabuchi, 1986
; Rappaport, 1991
; Strome,
1993
). Despite extensive research, the nature of the signal from the
spindle to the cortex is still elusive. The molecular mechanism of
accumulating myosin and other components of the contractile ring to the
equatorial region is also still unknown.
Recently, the cellular slime mold Dictyostelium discoideum
has emerged as an excellent model experimental system to study cytokinesis with molecular and cell biological approaches. For instance, Dictyostelium provided the opportunity to prove
genetically the critical roles myosin plays in cytokinesis, by
inactivating the single-copy myosin heavy chain gene (mhcA)
either by homologous recombination (De Lozanne and Spudich, 1987
) or by
antisense silencing (Knecht and Loomis, 1987
). These studies also
showed that the cells unable to carry out cytokinesis become large and
multinucleated and eventually lyse in suspension culture but on a solid
substratum can tear themselves into smaller pieces by amoeboid movement
and grow. The latter behavior, named "traction-mediated
cytofission," makes it possible to express mutated forms of myosin in
mhcA
cells. Furthermore, a chimeric gene that
consists of mhcA fused to the green fluorescent protein
(GFP) gene was expressed in mhcA
Dictyostelium cells and was found to be functional in
vivo (Moores et al., 1996
). This new technique, as well as
the more classic method of introducing fluorescently labeled myosin
into live cells (Chu and Fukui, 1996
; Yumura, 1996
), enabled real time
tracing of myosin localization in vivo. Thus, a wide spectrum of tools is now available to test a particular hypothesis concerning myosin's role or its regulation during cytokinesis in Dictyostelium.
In the popular "cortical flow model," the cortical components are
actively transported to the equatorial region to assemble the
contractile ring. In this model, tension is generated more or less
uniformly in the metaphase cortex, but subsequent polar relaxation or
equatorial stimulation triggers the cortex in each half of the cell to
pull itself toward the equatorial region and align circumferentially in
the plane of division (Bray and White, 1988
). It is assumed that this
transport process is driven by active cortical tension. Because
cortical tension is generated by active interactions between cortical
actin and myosin filaments (Reines and Clarke, 1985
; Pasternak et
al., 1989
; Kuczmarski et al., 1991
; Yumura, 1991
), it
is further assumed that the transport process is ultimately powered by
the motor activity of myosin (DeBiasio et al., 1996
).
We have tested this point by analyzing the behavior of enzymatically
inactive mutant Dictyostelium myosins recently isolated by
Ruppel and Spudich (1996)
. Our results demonstrate the independence of
the motor activity of myosin for its movement to the equatorial region.
Possible mechanisms of myosin accumulation toward the equatorial region
are discussed.
| |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Construction of Mutant Myosin Genes
Standard methods were used for all DNA manipulations (Ausubel
et al., 1994
).
The expression vector for GFP-myosin was constructed based on
pBIG-GFPmyo (Moores et al., 1996
), a kind gift from S. Moores and J. Spudich (Stanford University). Briefly, pBIG-GFPmyo
carries extrachromosomal replication sequences in
Dictyostelium, the neomycin-resistance gene, and the GFP
gene fused to the actin 15 promoter and to the wild-type
mhcA gene. pBIG-GFPmyo was first modified to include the
S65T mutation in the GFP gene, which has enhanced fluorescence properties (Heim et al., 1995
; the S65T GFP gene was a kind
gift from Dr. R. Tsien [University of California at San Diego, La
Jolla]). Additionally, to facilitate future subcloning process, the
vector backbone was exchanged from pBIG to pTIKL (Liu, Ito, Lee, and Uyeda, personal communication), a derivative of pBIG, which lacks NcoI and KpnI sites. The resultant plasmid
pTIKLGFPS65Tmyo was used to express the fluorescent wild-type myosin.
The three mutant mhcA genes carrying E476K, E459V and F481C/N483K mutations were generous gifts from K. Ruppel and J. Spudich. They were supplied on pBIG in the form of fusion with the actin 15 promoter and were used without modification to express the nonfluorescent form for immunofluorescence staining. To engineer the GFP-fused E476K, the EcoNI-NcoI fragment of pBIGE476K was used to replace the corresponding sequence in pTIKLGFPS65Tmyo.
Overexpression of soluble head fragments was achieved as follows. The
plasmid DH12.1R (Anson et al., 1996
; a generous gift from
Dr. D. Manstein [Max-Planck Institute, Dortmund, Germany]) drives
overexpression of M761-1R, a wild-type myosin head fragment truncated
at amino acid residue 761 and fused to one unit of triple
-coiled
coil repeat of the
-actinin gene, followed by the histidine tag. The
E476K mutation was introduced into DH12.1R using the EcoNI-BglII sites.
The pBIG- or pTIKL-based plasmids carrying each mutation were used to
transfect HS1, an mhcA
Dictyostelium cell line (Ruppel et al.,
1994
). Transformation was carried out by electroporation as described
previously (Egelhoff et al., 1991b
). DH12.1R and its
derivative were coelectroporated into HS1 cells together with a plasmid
that carried the Ddp2 open reading frame that is required in
trans for extrachromosomal replication of DH12.1R (Manstein
and Hunt, 1995
).
Culture of Dictyostelium Cells
Wild-type Ax2 and HS1 cells were maintained on 9-cm plastic
plates containing HL5 (Sussman, 1987
) supplemented with 60 µg/ml penicillin and 60 µg/ml streptomycin (PS). HS1 cells carrying one of
the G418-resistance plasmids were grown on plates containing HL5, PS,
and 12 µg/ml G418. For cell biological experiments, cells were
harvested from these plates and washed with BSS (10 mM NaCl, 10 mM KCl,
and 3 mM CaCl2).
For the purification of mutant myosins, cells were grown on 20 × 20 cm2 square plastic plates containing 100 ml of HL5, PS, and 12 µg/ml G418 at 21°C. When the culture had reached confluence, medium was changed to a fresh 200 ml of HL5 and PS, without G418, and the plates were incubated for additional 24-36 h on a rotary shaker.
Both G418-sensitive and -resistant cells were preincubated in 9-cm plates containing HL and PS for 24 h at 21°C before the cell division assay. They were then detached from the plates using 10-ml pipettes, counted, and inoculated in 200-ml flasks containing 50 ml of HL5 and PS at a density of around 2 × 105 cells/ml. The flasks were shaken at 200 rpm on a rotary shaker at 21°C, and the cell density was monitored at 12-h intervals until the wild-type cells have reached the stationary phase.
Introduction of Labeled Protein
Wild-type myosin was purified from Dictyostelium
cells (Ax2) and labeled with 5-iodoacetoamide fluorescein (IAF) as
described previously (Yumura, 1996
). Bovine serum albumin (BSA) was
labeled with tetramethylrhodamine (Yumura et al., 1995
).
These proteins were introduced into cells by electroporation as
described previously (Yumura et al., 1995
).
Fluorescence Microscopy
Cells were washed by centrifugation and suspended in BSS. They
were settled on a coverslip for 10 min and overlaid with a thin sheet
of agar as described previously (Yumura, 1996
). The coverslip was fixed
on an aluminum folder with a 1-cm2 square hole for
observation. The samples were observed by an inverted fluorescence
microscope (TMD300, Nikon, Tokyo, Japan) equipped with a silicone
intensified camera (C2400-08, Hamamatsu Photonics, Bridgewater, NJ).
Fluorescence of GFP was observed by using the B2 fluorescence cassette
(Nikon, B-2A) and of rhodamine was done by using the G fluorescence
cassette (Nikon, G-2A). The fluorescence images were digitized to 8 bits (256 gray scale) by an Argus 50 video processor (Hamamatsu
Photonics, Hamamatsu, Japan) and recorded on VHS video tapes. Eight
frames of sequential images were averaged real time. They were obtained
sequentially for eight 30-s periods with 10- to 30-s intervals to
minimize damage to the cells by illumination. The acquisition
conditions were set so that the highest brightness did not exceed the
saturation level. To estimate the rate of myosin's movement to the
equator, the fluorescence intensity of several fixed areas of 10 × 10 pixels along the spindle axis was quantified. The linearity
within the 256 gray levels in this assay was confirmed using
fluorescein isothiocyanate-labeled BSA previously (Yumura et
al., 1995
). The ratio images between IAF and rhodamine images
were calculated by the NIH Image software (Yumura, 1996
).
Immunofluorescence microscopy was done by the agar-overlay method
according to Yumura et al. (1984)
.
Preparation of Proteins
Typically, 10-15 g of cells were obtained from six plates
(20 × 20 cm2) for each preparation. Wild-type
M761-1R was purified according to the procedure of Manstein and Hunt
(1995)
with several modifications. Briefly, cells were washed twice in
5 mM NaN3 in 10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.4, and resuspended in
lysis buffer [25 mM HEPES, pH 8.0, 5 mM EDTA, 7 mM
-mercaptoethanol
(
ME), and a mixture of proteinase inhibitors (Manstein and Hunt,
1995
)] at 5 vol/g of cells. The suspension was mixed with lysis buffer
containing 1% Triton X-100 at 4 vol/g, incubated on ice for 10 min,
and centrifuged at 36,000 × g for 30 min. The pellets
were resuspended in the wash buffer (10 mM HEPES, pH 7.4, 1 mM EDTA,
and 7 mM
ME) and centrifuged at 36,000 × g for 15 min. The washed pellets were extracted with extraction buffer (10 mM
HEPES, pH 7.4, 50 mM NaCl, 5 mM MgCl2, 4 mM ATP, and 7 mM
ME) at 2 vol/g of cells and centrifuged at 250,000 × g for 1 h. The supernatant was loaded onto a column containing 1 ml of Ni-nitrilotriacetic acid agarose resin (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). The column was extensively washed with the HS/ATP buffer (10 mM HEPES, pH 7.4, 200 mM NaCl, 5 mM MgCl2, 1 mM
ATP, and 7 mM
ME), followed by the second extensive wash with a
solution containing 40 mM imidazole, pH 7.4, and 7 mM
ME. The
protein was eluted with 5 ml of 150 mM imidazole and 7 mM
ME and,
after addition of EDTA to 1 mM, was dialyzed against a buffer
containing 25 mM HEPES, pH 7.4, 25 mM KCl, 0.1 mM EDTA, and 1 mM
dithiothreitol (DTT).
The mutant E476K/M761-1R was unable to be purified as above, because
it hardly sedimented with the crude cytoskeleton fraction even in the
absence of exogenous ATP. Thus, it was purified from the supernatant
fraction as follows. The cells were washed twice in 10 mM Tris, pH 7.4, and resuspended in lysis buffer (25 mM HEPES, pH 7.4, 50 mM NaCl, 5 mM
MgCl2, 4 mM ATP, 7 mM
ME, and a mixture of proteinase
inhibitors) at 5 vol/g of cells. The suspension was mixed with lysis
buffer containing 1% Triton X-100 (4 vol/g) and immediately
centrifuged at 36,000 × g for 30 min. The supernatant was loaded onto a Q-Sepharose (Pharmacia Biotech, Tokyo, Japan) column
preequilibriated with buffer Q (10 mM HEPES, pH 7.4, 50 mM NaCl, 1 mM
MgCl2, 0.1 mM ATP, and 7 mM
ME), and the bound proteins
were eluted with a linear gradient of NaCl from 50 to 300 mM in buffer
Q. Fractions containing E476K/M761-1R were identified by dot blotting
using an anti-histidine tag monoclonal antibody (Dianova, Hamburg,
Germany), pooled, and loaded onto a 1 ml of Ni-NTA agarose column. The
column was washed and eluted as described above, and the eluted protein
was dialyzed against a buffer containing 25 mM HEPES, pH 7.4, 25 mM
KCl, 0.1 mM EDTA, and 1 mM DTT.
Rabbit skeletal muscle actin was prepared by the method of Spudich and
Watt (1971)
. The concentrations of these proteins were determined
spectrophotometrically with extinction coefficients of 0.62 cm2/mg at 290 nm for actin (Gordon et al., 1976
)
and 0.80 cm2/mg at 280 nm for M761-1R (Manstein, personal
communication).
ATPase Assays
Steady-state ATPase activities were determined by measuring
release of phosphate at 30°C by the method of Kodama et
al. (1986)
under the conditions described by Ruppel et
al. (1994)
. The reaction mixtures for the assay of MgATPase
activity contained 25 mM imidazole, pH 7.5, 25 mM KCl, 4 mM
MgCl2, 1 mM DTT, and 1 mM ATP, with or without filamentous
actin. The reaction mixture for high salt CaATPase activity
measurements was 0.6 M KCl, 5 mM CaCl2, 1 mM ATP, 1 mM DTT,
and 10 mM imidazole, pH 7.5.
Western Blotting
Total cell lysates were separated by SDS-PAGE (7.5%
polyacrylamide), blotted onto a nitrocellulose membrane, and probed
with anti-Dictyostelium myosin heavy chain antibodies as
described previously (Uyeda and Spudich, 1993
).
| |
RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Time Course of Myosin Behavior during Cytokinesis
Myosin was isolated from Dictyostelium cells and
labeled with IAF. Labeled myosin had actin-activated ATPase activities
comparable to unlabeled myosin and could assemble into filaments in
vitro, as described previously (Yumura, 1996
). The labeled myosin was introduced into wild-type Ax2 cells by electroporation and the IAF
fluorescence was followed within single cells from prometaphase through
cytokinesis (Figure 1). The stage of cell
cycle was judged from the observation of nuclei by phase-contrast
microscopy (Kitanishi-Yumura and Fukui, 1989
). Some myosin was
distributed in the cortical region and diffusely in the prometaphase
endoplasm (Figure 1b). The endoplasmic myosin decreased and accumulated
fairly uniformly in the cortical region during metaphase (Figure 1c).
The increase of cortical myosin may underlie the increase of global
cortical tension in prometaphase, when Dictyostelium cells
round up (Kitanishi-Yumura and Fukui, 1989
), similarly to dividing
animal cells. The transport of cortical myosin toward the equatorial
region along the cortex started at the onset of anaphase when the long
axis of the cell increased as two daughter nuclei separated. Within
4.0 ± 0.5 min (mean ± SD, n = 7), accumulation of
cortical myosin to the equatorial region was completed. The average
velocity of myosin transport was calculated to be about 2.9 µm/min
from the time-dependent changes of the fluorescence intensity at
several fixed areas along the spindle axis.
|
To examine whether the apparent concentration of myosin in the equatorial region was affected by the exclusion volume of intracellular organelles, IAF-labeled myosin and tetramethylrhodamine-labeled BSA was simultaneously introduced into cells (Figure 2). A ratio image between the two fluorescence intensities confirmed that myosin is indeed highly concentrated in the equatorial region. Filamentous structures of myosin were sometimes observed along the contractile ring (Figure 1k) but in many cases were not clearly resolved through a video camera.
|
Furrowing and constriction of this region followed and cell division was completed to yield two daughter cells. The constriction took 15.9 ± 3.5 min (mean ± SD, n = 13) after the onset of telophase. The intensity of fluorescence due to localized myosin did not diminish after division and persisted in the tail region of newly formed daughter cells, which migrated away from each other.
Nonhydrolyzer Myosin Is Also Transported to the Equatorial Region
We were interested to know whether this active process of myosin
transport is dependent on the motor activity of myosin itself. This
point can be examined experimentally by observing behavior of mutant
myosins with no motor activity. In this study we used the nonhydrolyzer
class mutants, which have no detectable ATPase activity and motor
activity in vitro due to the inability to break the phosphodiester bond
between
and
phosphates of ATP (Ruppel and Spudich, 1996
).
Each of the three nonhydrolyzer class mutant mhcA genes,
E476K, E459V, and F481C/N483K (a
double mutant), was individually transformed into
mhcA
Dictyostelium cells (Ruppel
et al., 1994
). Expression level of each mutant myosin in
these cells was comparable with that of wild-type myosin expressed in
mhcA
cells or with that of the endogenous
myosin in wild-type cells (Figure 3).
Ruppel and Spudich (1996)
reported that mhcA
cells expressing each of these mutant myosins cannot divide in suspension culture or form fruiting bodies, but these authors did not
show the actual data. We, therefore, repeated the cell division assay
(Figure 4). mhcA
cells expressing each one of the mutant myosins did not multiply in
number over a period of 4 d and became very large and
multinucleated, similarly to the parental mhcA
cells. This result confirms the previous report (Ruppel and Spudich, 1996
) that these mutant myosins are not functional in vivo.
|
|
We then examined whether these mutant myosins are accumulated in the
equatorial region of cells in telophase, as judged by the presence of
two small and condensed nuclei (for typical telophase nuclei, see
Kitanishi-Yumura and Fukui, 1989
). Immunofluorescence studies showed
that all three nonhydrolyzer myosins were concentrated in the
equatorial region (Figure 5). Myosin
molecules existed predominantly in the filamentous form, mostly
parallel to the plane of equator. The fact that all three independent
mutant nonhydrolyzer myosins showed the same localization indicates
that this localization is a general phenotype for the nonhydrolyzer
class mutant myosins (Figure 5, b-d).
|
mhcA
cells expressing each of the mutant
myosin were able to grow and divide on solid substratum without agar
overlay. By an analogy to the behavior of well-characterized parental
mhcA
cells, we speculate that the division
events of these cells in the absence of the agar overlay are mostly
through a process called "attachment-assisted mitotic cleavage,"
recently reported by Neujahr et al. (1997)
. However, these
"pseudocontractile rings" of mhcA
cells
expressing one of the nonhydrolyzer myosins showed little, if any, sign
of constriction under the conditions of agar overlay. Cells expressing
wild-type myosin were able to complete cytokinetic cleavage even under
the agar overlay (Figure 1).
Nonhydrolyzer Myosins Are Transported to the Equatorial Region with the Same Time Course as the Wild Type
The above observation that nonhydrolyzer myosins were concentrated in the equatorial region suggests that myosin is transported without its own ATPase and motor activities. However, it was also possible that the mutant myosins were transported very slowly to the equatorial region by using its very low residual ATPase activity. To distinguish between these two possibilities, we measured the rates of myosin transport to the equatorial region and also the rates of the residual ATPase activities.
For the real time tracing of myosin transport in vivo, we used
the GFP-fusion technique developed by Moores et al. (1996)
. The E476K mhcA gene, fused to the GFP gene at the amino
terminus (GFP-E476K), as well as the wild-type control (GFP-WT), were
separately expressed in mhcA
cells. GFP-WT
myosin normally accumulated in the equatorial region during mitosis
(Figure 6). We observed that in some
cells some GFP-WT myosin formed a single large aggregate beneath the
cell membrane that did not move to the equatorial region. Even in this case, rest of the myosin normally accumulated in the equatorial region,
and constriction of the contractile ring also proceeded normally.
GFP-E476K myosin formed a similar aggregate in most of cells.
Interestingly, many discrete filaments of myosin were readily observed
in GFP-E476K cells, unlike GFP-WT. These filaments did not move
noticeably in interphase cells but abruptly started to migrate toward
the equatorial region in anaphase (Figure
7). At least under the present conditions
of agar overlay, the furrow never constricted thereafter in GFP-E476K
cells.
|
|
The time course of increase in the GFP fluorescence intensity in the equatorial region was compared between GFP-WT and GFP-E476K cells (Figure 8). The fold increase was slightly less in the case of GFP-E476K than GFP-WT possibly in part due to the aggregation of GFP-E476K myosin. Nonetheless, the time required to complete the accumulation of myosin in the equatorial region was not significantly different between GFP-E476K (t = 4.0 ± 0.6 min; n = 21) and GFP-WT (t = 3.9 ± 0.6 min; n = 14). These time courses were also comparable to that of IAF-labeled myosin in wild-type cells.
|
ATPase Activities of E476K
The steady-state ATPase activities of E476K myosin were
undetectably too low and were not determined in the original study by
Ruppel and Spudich (1996)
. We were able to detect its activities by
preparing large quantities of the protein in a soluble form from
overexpressing cell lines (M761-1R), and also by extending the
reaction time to 1 h from the standard of 14-21 min.
The basal MgATPase activity of E476K/M761-1R was 0.0021 s
1, which was 57-fold smaller than that of wild-type
M761-1R (Table 1). The
MgATPase activity of E476K/M761-1R was hardly activated by actin of up
to 4 mg/ml, resulting in much larger difference in the actin-activated
activities between the two proteins. The difference was 380-fold in the
presence of 1 mg/ml actin and 580-fold when Vmax
values are compared.
|
The fold difference in the rate of accumulation of GFP myosin to the equatorial region and that of the actin-activated MgATPase activities are strikingly disproportionate, demonstrating that myosin can be transported toward the equatorial region and arranged to form the contractile ring structure without its own motor activities.
| |
DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The equatorial stimulation model (Rappaport, 1991
) and the polar
relaxation model (White and Borisy, 1983
; Bray and White, 1988
), an extension of a theory originally proposed by Wolpert (1960)
,
are the most recognized mechanisms of the cleavage furrow formation.
The present study shows that the myosin increased uniformly in the
cortical region, and then it moved to the equatorial region before the
cleavage process started, which indicates that the stimulation of the
myosin reorganization was not limited to the equatorial region. It is
therefore difficult to explain the entire process of myosin
reorganization by equatorial stimulation alone. The polar relaxation
model hypothesizes that metaphase cells generate global and uniform
cortical tension, and then an unknown stimulation from the mitotic
spindle triggers relaxation of both polar cortex and the cortex to
"contract" toward the equatorial region, depending on the active
cortical tension (the cortical flow model; Bray and White, 1988
). The
cortical flow preceding cytokinesis is supported by many observations:
the cortical transport of microinjected actin filaments toward the
equator (Cao and Wang, 1990b
) and the accumulation of surface receptors
(Koppel et al., 1982
; Wang et al., 1994
) and
particles attached to cell surface (Dan, 1954
). Cortical tension is
generated by active contraction of cortical actin and myosin filaments
(Reines and Clarke, 1985
; Yumura and Fukui, 1985
; Pasternak et
al., 1989
; Kuczmarski et al., 1991
; Yumura, 1991
).
Thus, implied in the cortical flow model is that the cortical flow is
ultimately driven by the contractile activity of cortical actin and
myosin (DeBiasio et al., 1996
).
We have tested this point by analyzing behavior of mutant myosins with
no detectable contractile or motor activity. A number of such mutations
are currently available in Dictyostelium and have been
classified into several groups depending on the biochemical phenotype
(Ruppel and Spudich, 1996
). In this study we used the nonhydrolyzer
class mutants. The primary defect in these mutant myosins is with the
hydrolysis of ATP, and other steps in the ATPase cycle appear
relatively normal (Ruppel and Spudich, 1996
). In the presence of ATP,
therefore, majority of the heads of such mutants carry bound ATP at the
ATP binding site and are in the so called "weakly bound state" with
actin. This constitutively weak affinity for actin is ideal in this
study because it should allow weak association of myosin filaments with
the cortical actin, without impeding possible cortical movement
generated by other mechanisms.
Consistent with the nonfunctional phenotype in vitro, all three
nonhydrolyzer mutant myosins were unable to complement the defects of
myosin null cells, such as the inability to divide in suspension
culture and form fruiting bodies (Ruppel and Spudich, 1996
; Figure 4).
Surprisingly, however, our immunofluorescence observation demonstrated
that all three mutant were correctly transported to the equatorial
region of telophase cells (Figure 5). Furthermore, the mutant myosin
filaments were aligned parallel to the equator. The fact that both
wild-type and E476K myosins were accumulated in the equatorial region
at similar rates, despite the large difference in the actin-activated
MgATPase activities, lead us to conclude that the motor activity of
myosin is not required for the transport of myosin to the equatorial
region. We also concluded that the E476K myosin, and probably wild-type
myosin as well, is passively carried to the equatorial region by some other mechanism. We often observed that E476K filaments moved some
distance toward the equator without being disassembled (our unpublished
observations). A similar observation has been reported for the movement
of myosin filaments in dividing fibroblasts (DeBiasio et
al., 1996
). Thus, the transport of myosin filaments appears to be
mediated by association with the cortical components rather than de
novo localized assembly of myosin filaments in the equatorial region
and disassembly in the polar region. This hypothesis is supported by
our recent finding that another mutant myosin, which is severely
impaired in the ability to disassemble to monomers, is equally well
concentrated in the equatorial region (Yumura and Uyeda, 1997
).
The passive transport of myosin filaments is reminiscent of the flow of
actin filaments toward the equatorial region (Cao and Wang, 1990a
).
Thus, the available evidence suggests that such cortical flow of actin
filaments is also independent of myosin's motor activity or cortical
tension. This speculation is consistent with the observations of Yumura
and Uyeda (1997)
and Neujahr et al. (1997)
that actin
filaments accumulate in the equatorial region even in cells devoid of
myosin filaments.
Relevant to the cortical equatorial movement of actin and myosin
filaments, Jay and Elson (1992)
have shown that surface particles are
carried to the posterior of polarized Dictyostelium
mhcA
cells. Since the contractile ring is
transformed to the posterior region of daughter cells after the
cleavage is complete, it seems reasonable to assume that there is a
common underlying motile mechanism between the movement of cortical
actin and myosin filaments toward the equatorial region and the
movement of surface particles toward the posterior of interphase cells.
Interestingly, our estimate of the average velocity of myosin filaments
toward the equatorial region (2.9 µm/min) is comparable to that of
beads on mhcA
cells (2.59 µm/min; Jay and
Elson, 1992
). These velocities are also comparable to that of the
transport of particles on the surface and injected actin filaments
toward the equatorial region in dividing animal cells (Cao and Wang,
1990b
; Hird and White, 1993
; Wang et al., 1994
). It would be
tempting to assume that other "unconventional" myosins are involved
in powering this process. Consistent with this model, concentration of
myosin I in the midbody region has been reported in mammalian cells
(Brecker and Burnside, 1994
). Immunofluorescence staining has shown
that myosin IB is primarily localized to the polar region of dividing
Dictyostelium cells (Fukui et al., 1989
).
However, Dictyostelium has been shown by low-stringency
hybridization to carry 13 putative unconventional myosin loci,
including six myosin I genes (Uyeda and Titus, 1997
), and localization
of these gene products to the equatorial region is yet to be examined.
Alternatively, dynamic structural changes of the actin cytoskeleton may
be driving the active cortical flow. In either case, we speculate that
myosin II is transported passively by associating with the cortical
actin cytoskeleton.
Movement of myosin filaments to the equatorial region can be explained
by other models that do not require active cortical flow. For instance,
it has been hypothesized that phosphorylation of regulatory light chain
or heavy chain of myosin determines the myosin localization (Kolega and
Taylor, 1980; Spudich, 1989
; Yumura and Kitanishi-Yumura, 1992
, 1993
;
Egelhoff et al., 1993
). However, mutant myosins that cannot
be phosphorylated on the heavy chain (Egelhoff et al.,
1991a
, 1993
) or on the regulatory light chain (Uyeda and Spudich, 1993
;
Ostrow et al., 1994
) are at least partially functional in
vivo. Our recent immunofluorescence studies further demonstrated that
these mutant myosins are properly localized to the contractile ring,
unambiguously eliminating the essential roles of phosphorylation
regulation of myosin in its localization to the contractile ring
(Yumura and Uyeda, 1997
).
Another still plausible model assumes that an unidentified protein with
a strong affinity for myosin is specifically localized in the
equatorial region of a dividing cell, and myosin is attracted to these
regions in a passive manner. This model is supported by a cytological
study of Schroeder and Otto (1988)
, who observed that myosin is still
bound specifically to actin-free contractile rings. This possibility is
further supported by segregation of muscle and nonmuscle myosins
coexpressed in nonmuscle cells. Skeletal muscle myosin filaments were
present in the cytoplasm and were not incorporated into stress fibers,
whereas nonmuscle myosin filaments were (Moncman et al.,
1993
).
In summary, we have demonstrated that the contractile activity of myosin is not required for the transport of myosin filaments to the equatorial region of dividing Dictyostelium cells. This does not necessarily rule out the possible involvement of active cortical flow, powered by unconventional myosins, or structural changes of the actin cytoskeleton. Further experiments are warranted to test this and other hypotheses.
| |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
We thank Dr. Kathleen Ruppel for the gift of the nonhydrolyzer mutant myosin genes, Sheri Moores for the gift of the GFP-myosin expression plasmid, and Dr. James Spudich for allowing us to use these materials before publication. Dr. Dietmar Manstein also kindly provided us with the M761-1R construct before publication. We also thank Dr. Roger Tsien for the kind gift of the S65T GFP gene. This work is partly supported by a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research from the Ministry of Education Science and Culture of Japan to S.Y.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The Model Organism for Basic Biology, Tokyo: Universal Academy Press.This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
Y. Iwadate and S. Yumura Actin-based propulsive forces and myosin-II-based contractile forces in migrating Dictyostelium cells J. Cell Sci., April 15, 2008; 121(8): 1314 - 1324. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Lucero, C. Stack, A. R. Bresnick, and C. B. Shuster A Global, Myosin Light Chain Kinase-dependent Increase in Myosin II Contractility Accompanies the Metaphase-Anaphase Transition in Sea Urchin Eggs Mol. Biol. Cell, September 1, 2006; 17(9): 4093 - 4104. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Lord, E. Laves, and T. D. Pollard Cytokinesis Depends on the Motor Domains of Myosin-II in Fission Yeast but Not in Budding Yeast Mol. Biol. Cell, November 1, 2005; 16(11): 5346 - 5355. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
X. Liu, S. Shu, M. Kovacs, and E. D. Korn Biological, Biochemical, and Kinetic Effects of Mutations of the Cardiomyopathy Loop of Dictyostelium Myosin II: IMPORTANCE OF ALA400 J. Biol. Chem., July 22, 2005; 280(29): 26974 - 26983. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. S. K. Uchida, T. Kitanishi-Yumura, and S. Yumura Myosin II contributes to the posterior contraction and the anterior extension during the retraction phase in migrating Dictyostelium cells J. Cell Sci., January 1, 2003; 116(1): 51 - 60. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Nagasaki, G. Itoh, S. Yumura, and T. Q.P. Uyeda Novel Myosin Heavy Chain Kinase Involved in Disassembly of Myosin II Filaments and Efficient Cleavage in Mitotic Dictyostelium Cells Mol. Biol. Cell, December 1, 2002; 13(12): 4333 - 4342. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Shu, X. Liu, C. A. Parent, T. Q. P. Uyeda, and E. D. Korn Tail chimeras of Dictyostelium myosin II support cytokinesis and other myosin II activities but not full development J. Cell Sci., November 15, 2002; 115(22): 4237 - 4249. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. A. Guertin, S. Trautmann, and D. McCollum Cytokinesis in Eukaryotes Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev., June 1, 2002; 66(2): 155 - 178. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Nagasaki, E. L. de Hostos, and T. Q. P. Uyeda Genetic and morphological evidence for two parallel pathways of cell-cycle-coupled cytokinesis in Dictyostelium J. Cell Sci., May 15, 2002; 115(10): 2241 - 2251. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
|