![]() |
|
|
Vol. 8, Issue 12, 2475-2486, December 1997
and
*Department of Biochemistry, Faculty of Medicine, The University of
Tokyo, Hongo, Tokyo 113, Japan; and
Cell Cycle
Laboratory, Imperial Cancer Research Fund, Lincoln's Inn Fields,
London WC2A 3PX, England
| |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe, p34cdc2 plays a central role controlling the cell cycle. We recently isolated a new gene named srw1+, capable of encoding a WD repeat protein, as a multicopy suppressor of hyperactivated p34cdc2. Cells lacking srw1+ are sterile and defective in cell cycle controls. When starved for nitrogen source, they fail to effectively arrest in G1 and die of accelerated mitotic catastrophe if regulation of p34cdc2/Cdc13 by inhibitory tyrosine phosphorylation is compromised by partial inactivation of Wee1 kinase. Fertility is restored to the disruptant by deletion of Cig2 B-type cyclin or slight inactivation of p34cdc2. srw1+ shares functional similarity with rum1+, having abilities to induce endoreplication and restore fertility to rum1 disruptants. In the srw1 disruptant, Cdc13 fails to be degraded when cells are starved for nitrogen. We conclude that Srw1 controls differentiation and cell cycling at least by negatively regulating Cig2- and Cdc13-associated p34cdc2 and that one of its roles is to down-regulate the level of the mitotic cyclin particularly in nitrogen-poor environments.
| |
INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In virtually all eukaryotes, cyclin-dependent protein kinases
(Cdk) play key roles controlling cell cycling (reviewed by Nurse, 1990
;
Nigg, 1995
; Okayama et al., 1996
; Murakami and Okayama, 1997
). In the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe, the
single Cdk encoded by cdc2+
(p34cdc2) controls the onsets of both S phase and mitosis
(Nurse and Bissett, 1981
). During cell cycle progression the activity
of p34cdc2 is regulated positively and negatively at least
by three kinds of biochemical events. One is association with a cyclin
molecule, which is essential for kinase activity and strictly regulated in amount during cell cycling. The second is inhibitory phosphorylation at Tyr15 of p34cdc2. The third is negative regulation by
Cdk inhibitors.
Three kinds of B-type cyclins are known to associate with
p34cdc2. Cdc13 is a key cyclin essential for
p34cdc2 to perform mitosis (Booher et al., 1989
;
Moreno et al., 1989
) and is also involved in the cell cycle
"start" (Fisher and Nurse 1996
; Mondesert et al., 1996
).
Cig2 promotes the cell cycle start and negatively regulates
differentiation (Obara-Ishihara and Okayama, 1994
; Mondesert et
al., 1996
). Cig1 is the third cyclin that is thought to act in
G2 or mitosis (Basi and Draetta, 1995
). The protein levels
of these cyclins are strictly regulated by transcription and
ubiquitin-dependent proteolysis catalyzed by the 26S proteasome (Glotzer et al., 1991
; Gorden et al., 1993
;
Funabiki et al., 1996
; Gorden et al., 1996
).
After passing through start in G1,
p34cdc2/Cdc13 undergoes inhibitory phosphorylation at
Tyr15, which is catalyzed by Wee1 and Mik1 kinases (Russell and Nurse,
1987
; Gould and Nurse, 1989
; Featherstone and Russell, 1991
; Lundgren
et al., 1991
; Hayles and Nurse, 1995
). At the
G2-M boundary, the complex gets activated by Cdc25 and
Pyp3 phosphatases-catalyzed dephosphorylation, which leads to the onset
of mitosis (Russell and Nurse, 1986
; Millar et al., 1991
,
1992
).
One major Cdk inhibitor known in fission yeast is
rum1+, which was initially isolated as an
inducer of multiple rounds of DNA replication without intervention by
mitosis and subsequently shown to inhibit p34cdc2/Cdc13
(Moreno and Nurse, 1994
; Correa-Bordes and Nurse, 1995
). Cells deleted
for rum1+ are sterile and defective in cell
cycle control (Moreno and Nurse, 1994
). The sterility but not the cell
cycle defect is partially suppressed by deletion of Cig2 cyclin
(Martin-Castellanos et al., 1996
), suggesting a link between
this inhibitor and B-type cyclins. However, understanding the
regulation of p34cdc2 kinase as a key controller of cell
cycling and differentiation is far from complete.
We recently launched an extensive search for factors regulating
p34cdc2 and screened a S. pombe cDNA library for
multicopy suppressors of the rad1-1 wee1-50 double mutant,
a checkpoint mutant that dies of premature activation of
p34cdc2 at the restrictive temperature (Al-Khodairy and
Carr, 1992
; Rowley et al., 1992
). Here we report the
identification of srw1+, a gene encoding a WD
repeat protein that controls differentiation and cell cycling by
negatively regulating p34cdc2/B-type cyclin complexes.
| |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Strains, Media, Libraries, and Vectors
The strains of S. pombe used in this study are listed
in Table 3. Media were prepared as described
previously (Egel and Egel-Mitani, 1974
; Gutz et al., 1974
;
Moreno et al., 1990
; Okazaki et al., 1990
). The
S. pombe cDNA library was constructed with mRNA from exponentially growing S. pombe cells by H. Tanaka. The
vectors used have been described previously (Okazaki et al.,
1990
; Igarashi et al., 1991
).
|
Isolation and Structural Analysis of the srw1+ Gene
The rad1-1 wee1-50 leu1-32 cells were cultured at
23°C to midlog phase in MB medium containing 0.15% leucine and
transfected with the S. pombe cDNA library as described
(Okazaki et al., 1990
). The cells were incubated at 23°C
for 24 h on minimum medium agar (MMA) plates and then selected at
32.2°C for 4 d. Plasmid DNA was recovered from authentic
transformants and cloned in Escherichia coli. DNA sequences
were determined by the dideoxy method (Sanger et al., 1977
).
Gene Disruption
The srw1+ gene was disrupted as follows. A genomic DNA fragment containing the srw1+ gene was isolated from a S. pombe HindIII-genomic library by colony hybridization. The 2.2-kilobase (kb) EcoRI fragment containing 98% of the srw1+-coding region was replaced with the 1.8-kb HindIII-excised ura4+ gene. The linear fragment carrying the replaced gene was transfected into the h-/h+ ade6-M210/ade6-M216 leu1-32/leu1-32 ura4-D18/ura4-D18 diploid strain, and stable ura4+ cells were isolated. Disruptants were identified by Southern blot using the 0.7-kb HindIII-EcoRI fragment as a probe.
Assay for Conjugation
Mating frequencies were assayed as follows. The
h- leu1-32, h
srw1 leu1-32, h
cig2
srw1 leu1-32, h+s cdc2-M35
srw1 leu1-32 cells were grown in yeast extract liquid at
25°C, rinsed with water, and mixed with equivalent cultures of
h+s leu1-32 or
h- leu1-32 cells and incubated on
malt extract agar plates for 2 d. Mating frequencies were
calculated by dividing the number of zygotes by the number of total
cells.
Flow Cytometry
Flow cytometry was performed as described previously (Tanaka
et al., 1992
), by using the FACScan system and the CellFIT
cell cycle analysis program with the software LYSIS (Becton Dickinson, San Jose, CA).
Assay for Loss of Cell Viability Induced by the Expression of cdc2+F15 and cdc13+
The coding regions of cdc2+F15 and
cdc13+ were inserted into the pcL expression
vector, which contains a LEU2 selection marker, a replication origin,
and the SV40 promoter to drive the expression of the insert. The vector
carrying the insert was then transfected into
srw1
leu1-32, leu1-32,
srw1 wee1-50
leu1-32, and wee1-50 leu1-32 cells, and
leu+-transformed cells were selected. The ratios of
leu+ colonies formed with cdc2+F15
and cdc13+ to those formed with the empty vector
were calculated and expressed as percent colony formation.
Northern Blot Analysis
Total RNA was prepared and Northern blot analysis was performed
with the 32P-labeled 1.3-kb fragment of
ste11+ as a probe as described previously
(Nagata et al., 1991
; Kato et al., 1996
).
Western Blot Analysis
Cells (2-5 × 108) were washed once with
water, resuspended in 200 µl of 10% trichloroacetic acid, and
disrupted by vortexing with glass beads. After washing with acetone
five times, proteins were solubilized by boiling for 5 min in the
extraction buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.4, 1 mM EDTA, 1 mM
dithiothreitol, 0.5 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, and 1% SDS)
(Watanabe et al., 1997
). Cell extracts (20 µg per lane)
were separated by 10% SDS-PAGE (Laemmli, 1970
), transferred to
Immobilon TM-P membrane (Millipore, Bedford, MA), and the desired
protein was detected using ECL (Amersham). Immunoblot was
carried out with 1:2000-diluted anti-Cdc13p rabbit antibodies (SP4),
1:2000-diluted anti-Cig2p affinity-purified antibody and
1:50,000-diluted anti-
-tubulin monoclonal antibody (Sigma T5168,
Sigma Chemical, St. Louis, MO).
| |
RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Isolation of the srw1+ Gene
To isolate new elements negatively regulating p34cdc2,
we screened a S. pombe cDNA library for those that
suppressed the lethality of the rad1-1 wee1-50 double
mutant as described previously (Okazaki et al., 1990
) and
isolated several clones having such an activity. The rad1-1
wee1-50 double mutant is defective in a S-G2
checkpoint control and dies of mitotic catastrophe due to premature
activation of p34cdc2 upon shift to the nonpermissive
temperature (Al-Khodairy and Carr, 1992
; Rowley et al.,
1992
). Consequently, any one of wee1+,
mik1+, and rad1+
suppresses this mutant. One clone did not hybridize with any of them
and was therefore characterized further.
The clone suppressed the rad1-1 wee1-50 double
mutant up to 34.5°C, 2°C above the restriction temperature. It also
suppressed not only the rad3-136 wee1-50 (Figure
1A), rad9-192 wee1-50,
chk1 wee1-50 but also
mik1 wee1-50 double
mutants, all of which die of mitotic catastrophe at the nonpermissive
temperature, suggesting that this new gene inhibits the activity of
p34cdc2/Cdc13 despite low levels of Tyr15 kinase
activities. Consistently, overexpression of the clone in wild-type
cells resulted in cell elongation, a typical phenotype of cell cycle
retardation or arrest, although in a small population. Cell elongation
became more evident in nitrogen-poor medium (Figure 1B), suggesting
that the activity of this clone might be enhanced in nitrogen-starved
environments. This gene was named srw1+
(suppressor of rad
wee1) and characterized more extensively.
|
srw1+ Encodes a WD Repeat Protein
srw1+ contains a contiguous open
reading frame capable of encoding a 556-amino acid protein with seven
WD repeats commonly present in the
-transducin family (Figure
2). It is significantly homologous (38%
amino acid identity) with the hypothetical protein of S. cerevisiae Yg1003c identified by the Genome Sequence Project. In
addition, Srw1 is also homologous with four distinct proteins, especially in the WD repeat domain. They are Fizzy (Drosophila melanogaster) (Dawson et al., 1995
), p55CDC (Homo
Sapiens)(Weinstein et al., 1994
), CDC20 (S. cerevisiae)(Sethi et al., 1991
), and Slp1 (S. pombe)(Matsumoto, 1997
)(Figure 2). Fizzy is reportedly required
for the degradation of cyclins A and B during mitosis. Accordingly,
fizzy mutations cause metaphase arrest accompanied by
failure to degrade mitotic cyclins. p55CDC is expressed in dividing
cells. CDC20 is required for microtubule-dependent processes, such as
nuclear movements before anaphase, chromosome separation, and nuclear
fusion during mating of G1 cells, whereas Slp1 genetically interacts with Wee1 kinase or Cdc25 phosphatase, thereby promoting cells to restart the cell cycle after DNA repair is completed.
|
Cells Lacking srw1+ Are Sterile
To investigate the biological role of srw1+, a null allele of srw1+ was constructed by one-step gene replacement. A genomic fragment containing srw1+ was isolated by colony hybridization, and the almost entire open reading frame was replaced with the ura4+ gene, followed by transfection into a diploid strain and by selection for stable ura+ diploid cells. Successful disruptants were identified by Southern blot analysis. The diploid cells, in which one allele of srw1+ was disrupted, were germinated to obtain haploid disruptants, which were then extensively backcrossed with wild-type cells to eliminate second mutations.
The srw1 disruptants (
srw1) grew in the
regular medium with no apparent growth defects. However, they showed
severe sterility even if wild- type cells were used as a mating partner
(Figure 3A and Table
1). We failed to find
even a single conjugated cell or spore ascus after extensive search.
Sterility was indeed caused by the inactivation of
srw1+ because it was effectively suppressed by
the srw1+ cDNA as well as genomic DNA.
|
|
Deletion of cig2+ or Inactivation of Cdc2 Partially Suppresses Sterility
Cig2/Cyc17 cyclin negatively regulates sexual development as well
as promotes the cell cycle start (Obara-Ishihara and Okayama, 1994
),
specifying p34cdc2 as a kinase partner (Martin-Castellanos
et al., 1996
). Because srw1+ was able
to inhibit p34cdc2/Cdc13 as described above, we speculated
that the sterility of
srw1 cells might have resulted, at
least partly, from the hyperactivation of p34cdc2/Cig2.
This proved true. In a conjugation assay using wild-type cells as a
mating partner, cig2+ deletion restored
fertility to the disruptant to more than one-half the ability of
wild-type cells (Figure 3A and Table 1). The kinase partner of Cig2 for
this mating inhibition is likely to be p34cdc2 because
partial inactivation of p34cdc2 also restored mating
ability to the disruptant, although only marginally. The
temperature-sensitive cdc2-M35 mutant allele is partially
inactivated at 25°C (Nurse and Thuriaux, 1980
). At this temperature,
the cdc2-M35
srw1 double mutant was still
sterile. However, when the temperature was raised to 27°C, a small
fraction of the cells came to perform mating and sporulation (Figure 3A and Table 1). Further elevation in the temperature did not increase the
mating frequencies perhaps because the cells tended to arrest in
G2 due to more inactivation of p34cdc2. These
results suggest that the srw1+ gene product
promotes sexual development at least by inactivating p34cdc2/Cig2.
The transcriptional factor Ste11 is essential for the initiation
of sexual development (Sugimoto et al., 1991
), and various differentiation signals including nitrogen starvation signal regulate the expression of ste11+. Therefore, it was
important to know whether srw1+ influenced
ste11+ mRNA induction. Our unpublished
observations show that in
srw1 cells
ste11+ was expressed and induced to the same
extent as wild-type cells upon nitrogen starvation. In addition,
ectopic expression of ste11+ driven by the SV40
promoter failed to restore fertility to
srw1 cells,
indicating that srw1+ promotes sexual
development but not via transcriptional regulation of
ste11+.
srw1 Cells Are Partially Defective in Nitrogen
Starvation-Induced G1 Arrest
The ability to arrest in G1 in response to both
nitrogen starvation and mating pheromones is considered to be critical
for cells to perform conjugation. We therefore examined the ability of
the disruptant to arrest in G1 in response to nitrogen
starvation. In conjugation-inducing malt extract medium, which contains
a limited amount of nitrogen,
srw1 cells proliferated as
rapidly as wild-type cells, and both ceased proliferation as nitrogen source was exhausted. At this point, approximately 50% of
heterothallic wild-type cells arrested in G1 whereas
virtually none of the
srw1 cells arrested in
G1 (Figure 3B). In homothallic cells, in which mating
pheromone signaling is activated, srw1+ was not
essential but still required for full G1 arrest. Contrary to our expectation, unlike fertility, G1 arrest ability
failed to be restored by the deletion of cig2+
(Figure 3C). Needless to say, lack of G1-arrested cells in
the disruptant was not caused by a failure of cell separation before arrest. The growth-arrested
srw1 cells became small, and
each cell had a single nucleus just like wild-type cells (Figure 3C). These results indicate that there are other target molecule(s) for
srw1+ that are specifically required for
G1 arrest.
Nevertheless, heterothallic
srw1 cells were not totally
defective in G1 arrest ability. Abrupt removal of nitrogen
source, such as shift to nitrogen-free minimum medium, induced
G1 arrest to the disruptant although the G1
arrest was partial and significantly delayed (see below).
srw1 wee1-50ts Double Mutant Dies of Mitotic
Catastrophe
As shown already, overexpression of srw1+
inhibited the activity of p34cdc2/Cdc13. This does not
necessarily mean that endogenous Srw1 is involved in mitotic control.
We therefore investigated this point. As aforementioned,
srw1 cells showed no apparent defects in mitotic control
in the regular growth conditions. However, srw1+
was absolutely required for proper mitotic control when the negative regulation of Cdc2/Cdc13 by tyrosine phosphorylation was compromised by
inactivation of Wee1 kinase. Despite inactivation of Wee1, the
temperature-sensitive wee1-50 mutant grows at 36°C
because of the presence of the functionally redundant Mik1 kinase
(Nurse, 1975
; Thuriaux et al., 1978
; Lundgren et
al., 1991
). However, the
srw1 wee1-50 double mutant
was unable to grow at this temperature even on nutritionally rich YEA
plates (Figure 4A).
This resulted from massive entry into mitotic catastrophe, which was
characterized by anucleated cells and cells with the nucleus divided by
septum ("cut" phenotype) (Figure 4B). These results indicate that
srw1+ plays a role negatively controlling the
activity of p34cdc2/Cdc13 in cell cycling.
|
The next question we addressed is how srw1+
regulates the activity of p34cdc2/Cdc13. Inhibition of DNA
synthesis by hydroxyurea activates a S-G2 checkpoint
control, which prevents the activation of p34cdc2/Cdc13
predominantly via inhibiting Tyr15 dephosphorylation (Enoch et
al., 1992
). Hydroxyurea treatment effectively blocked entry of
srw1 wee1-50 cells into mitotic catastrophe that
occurred upon shift to the nonpermissive temperature, and induced cell elongation (Figure 4B). This is in sharp contrast to
mik1
wee1-50 cells, which failed to arrest by hydroxyurea and
prematurely entered mitosis with massive catastrophic cell death. This
result suggests that srw1+ is likely to
negatively regulate the p34cdc2/Cdc13 activity mainly by a
mechanism independent of tyrosine 15 phosphorylation.
To further investigate the relationship between
srw1+ and Tyr15 regulation, we used
mik1 wee1-50 strain and Cdc2F15. As noted
earlier, overexpressed srw1+ rescued not only
the rad1 wee1-50 but also
mik1 wee1-50
strain. As shown in Figure 4C, 4,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI)
staining revealed that overexpressed srw1+
effectively suppressed the mitotic catastrophe of the
mik1
wee1-50 strain. This result supports our initial observation that
the action of srw1+ is mostly, if not entirely,
independent of tyrosine 15 phosphorylation. To further confirm and
extend this observation, we tested the effect on cell viability of the
expression of constitutively active Cdc2F15, in which
tyrosine 15 was replaced with unphosphorylatable phenylalanine to
completely eliminate the regulation by Tyr15 phosphorylation. The
coding region of cdc2+F15 was inserted into the
pcL expression vector driven by the SV40 promoter and containing the
leu+ marker gene. If the cells transfected with
the vector would lose viability by the expression of the insert, less
leu+ colonies would be formed. Expression of
pcL-cdc2+F15 was not highly toxic to wild type
cells, and leu+ colonies were formed at 42% the efficiency
of the empty vector (Table
2). On the contrary,
pcL-cdc2+F15 was extremely toxic to
srw1 cells, and its colony-forming efficiency was reduced
more than 200-fold. Thus, the combination of Cdc2F15
expression and inactivation of srw1+ seemed
lethal to cells, reinforcing our initial observation.
|
Our observation suggested that the function of
srw1+ seemed to be enhanced during nitrogen
starvation. To investigate this possibility, the effect of nitrogen
starvation on the growth ability of
srw1 wee1-50 cells
was studied. Both wee1-50 and
mik1 wee1-50 cells were used as controls. At 30°C on PM+N plates, all these mutants grew without noticeable difficulties. But on nitrogen-poor PM-N
plates or in such medium, unlike wee1-50 single and
mik1 wee1-50 double mutants,
srw1 wee1-50
cells failed to grow (Figure 4D) and died of increased mitotic
catastrophe (Figure 4E). By contrast,
mik1 wee1-50 cells
were unable to grow on nutritionally rich YEA plates or in
nitrogen-rich PM+N medium and died of increased mitotic catastrophe.
These results confirm the initial observation and strongly indicate
that the biological role of Srw1 is signified in nitrogen-poor
environments.
Overexpression of srw1+ Induces Endoreplication
As one might have noticed previously, there is a striking
functional similarity between srw1+ and
rum1+. Both genes inhibit the onset of mitosis,
both gene disruptants are phenotypically similar, being sterile and
defective in nitrogen starvation-induced G1 arrest and in
mitotic control, and their sterility is suppressed by deletion of Cig2
(Moreno and Nurse, 1994
; Martin-Castellanos et al., 1996
).
To further investigate the similarity, we examined the ability of
srw1+ to induce endoreplication. To obtain high
expression of srw1+, the G-tail of the
srw1+ cDNA was deleted, reinserted into the
thiamin-repressible pREP1 vector (pREP-srw1+*),
and expressed in wild-type cells. Upon removal of thiamin, many cells
showed enlarged nuclei brightly stained with DAPI (Figure 5A). FACS analysis revealed that some
cell population contained 4C (4 DNA content) or more DNA highly
indicative of endoreplication (Figure 5B). Interestingly, a
considerable fraction of cells arrested in 1C (1 DNA content),
suggesting that Srw1 has the ability to block the onsets of both S
phase and mitosis. Partial block of S phase onset was also observed
with wild-type cells harboring an integrated copy of
pREP2-srw1+*. In addition, overexpression of
srw1+ restored fertility to
rum1
cells (Figure 5C). With wild-type cells as a mating partner,
srw1+-overexpressing
rum1 cells
conjugated at about 20% the frequency of control wild-type cells. By
contrast, overexpression of rum1+ failed to
restore fertility to
srw1 cells. These results establish functional similarities between Srw1 and Rum1 although the molecular mechanisms by which they inhibit p34cdc2/B-type cyclin are
unlikely to be the same.
|
Srw1 Is Involved in Regulation of the Amount of Cdc13
To gain further insights into the function of
srw1+, we examined the effect of Cdc13
overproduction on the viability of
srw1 cells.
Overexpression of cdc13+ in
srw1
cells had little effect but decreased colony formation slightly.
However, when the disruptant was slightly inactivated for Wee1 kinase,
Cdc13 overproduction had a dramatic effect. Even at a highly permissive
temperature of 25°C for wee1-50, overexpressed cdc13+ was highly toxic to
srw1
wee1-50 cells (Table 2), and they died of mitotic catastrophe.
These results, combined with the independence of Srw1 function from
Tyr15 phosphorylation and its structural similarity to Fizzy reportedly
required for cyclin degradation in Drosophila (Dawson
et al., 1995
), suggest that srw1+
inhibits the p34cdc2/Cdc13 activity possibly by modulating
the amount of Cdc13.
We therefore investigated the protein level of Cdc13 and also Cig2
B-type cyclins in
srw1 cells by Western blot analysis. As
already noted, when transferred to nitrogen-free minimum medium,
srw1 cells could arrest in G1 despite a
significant delay. At 24 h posttransfer, more than one-half of
wild-type cells arrested in G1 with marked reduction in the
level of Cdc13 (Figure 6). At 48 h,
more than 90% of the cells were in G1 with a nearly
undetectable level of Cdc13. By contrast, in
srw1 cells,
the amount of Cdc13 did not decrease, but tended to rather slightly
increase, at 48 h despite that more than one-half the cells
arrested in G1. This result shows that Srw1 is essential
for decrease of Cdc13 upon nitrogen starvation. By contrast, Cig2
cyclin behaved differently. In both wild-type and
srw1
cells, Cig2 disappeared upon nitrogen starvation, suggesting that Srw1
inhibits p34cdc2/Cig2 by a different mechanism and that the
action of Srw1 to p34cdc2/Cig2 might be early in nitrogen
starvation.
|
| |
DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
How cell differentiation and the cell cycle are coordinately regulated is one critical question that remains to be addressed. Our data show that the newly identified srw1+ gene is involved in this regulation. Cells lacking this gene are defective in both cell differentiation and cell cycle controls. Their most apparent phenotypes are sterility and defects in G1 and mitotic controls. Sterility was so severe that no conjugated cells were detected throughout this series of experiments (Table 1). The defect in G1 control mainly involves the cell's inability to arrest or slow down before the onset of S phase. However, the disruptant is not completely defective in G1 arrest ability. When mating pheromone signaling was activated or cells were rapidly starved for nitrogen, they could arrest in G1 at least partly. By contrast, their defect in mitotic control is dormant until the regulation of Cdc2 by tyrosine phosphorylation is slightly compromised by partial inactivation of Wee1 kinase. In such a situation, Srw1 is absolutely required for blocking premature mitosis and such a role of Srw1 is particularly evident in nitrogen-poor environments.
All the genetic and functional analysis data led us to conclude that,
particularly responding to nitrogen starvation, Srw1 promotes
differentiation and inhibits the onset of mitosis via inhibiting at
least p34cdc2/Cig2 and p34cdc2/Cdc13,
respectively (Figure 7). Cig2 cyclin
plays a dual role inhibiting cell differentiation and promoting the
cell cycle start (Obara-Ishihara and Okayama, 1994
; Mondesert et
al., 1996
). Interestingly, the sterility but not the
G1 arrest inability of
srw1 cells was effectively suppressed by the deletion of Cig2. The lack of the restoration of the G1 arrest ability was unexpected but may
be explained by the presence of Cdc13 mitotic cyclin, which shares the
S phase start function with Cig2 (Fisher and Nurse 1996
; Mondesert et al., 1996
). Thus, Srw1 plays a key role in the
coordinated regulation of cell differentiation and proliferation by
nutrient starvation.
|
Our genetic data suggested that the primary target(s) for the Srw1 action for mitotic control were not Tyr15 of Cdc2 but Cdc13 B-type cyclin. This was confirmed by the biochemical data demonstrating that Srw1 negatively regulates the level of Cdc13 upon nitrogen starvation (Figure 6). Taking the structural similarity with fizzy into consideration, it is most probable that Srw1 might directly promote degradation of Cdc13. However, contrary to our expectation, Srw1 is unlikely to play a role regulating the level of Cig2. Regardless of the presence or absence of Srw1, Cig2 was degraded upon nitrogen starvation, suggesting that Srw1 might inhibit p34cdc2/Cig2 by a different mechanism.
Interestingly, Srw1 shares striking functional similarity with Rum1
despite their structural dissimilarity. Both deletion mutants are
sterile, and their sterility is suppressed at least in part by the
inactivation of Cig2. In addition, both mutants are defective in
G1 and mitotic controls, and their defects in mitotic
control are displayed when the mitotic start regulation by tyrosine
phosphorylation is compromised. Both overexpressed srw1+ and rum1+ block the
onset of mitosis and induce endoreplication. The major target for both
factors is Cdc2 kinase associated with B-type cyclins. But, the
molecular mechanisms by which they inhibit p34cdc2/B-type
cyclins appear to differ at least partly. Rum1 directly binds
p34cdc2/Cdc13 and inhibits its activity (Correa-Bordes and
Nurse, 1995
), whereas the primary action of Srw1 to the mitotic kinase
seems to be to regulate the level of Cdc13.
In addition to rum1+ deletion mutants,
cells deficient in nuc2+ are phenotypically
similar to
srw1 cells. They are sterile and defective in
nitrogen starvation-induced G1 arrest (Kumada et al., 1995
). Despite such similarity, srw1+
and nuc2+ seem to differ fundamentally at least
in some functional aspects and therefore in their targets.
srw1+ inhibits the onset of mitosis whereas
nuc2+ promotes the metaphase-anaphase
transition while inhibiting formation of septum.
Recently we learned that srw1+ is identical to
ste9+ (Kitamura et al., personal
communication). The ste9 mutant was initially isolated a
long time ago but has not well been characterized until recently
(Sipiczki, 1988
).
| |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
We thank P. Nurse and his laboratory members for supplying strains, antibodies, and helpful support; K. Kitamura for comparing the amino acid sequence of ste9+ with that of srw1+; and S. Moreno for supplying a strain. We also thank K. Okazaki for the genomic DNA library and helpful discussion. This work was supported by grants from the Ministry of Science, Education and Culture, Japan, and from Human Frontier Science Program.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
-transducin homolog, is required for a subset of microtubule-dependent cellular processes.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
11, 5592-5602This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. Vanstraelen, M. Baloban, O. Da Ines, A. Cultrone, T. Lammens, V. Boudolf, S. C. Brown, L. De Veylder, P. Mergaert, and E. Kondorosi APC/CCCS52A complexes control meristem maintenance in the Arabidopsis root PNAS, July 14, 2009; 106(28): 11806 - 11811. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Z. Larson-Rabin, Z. Li, P. H. Masson, and C. D. Day FZR2/CCS52A1 Expression Is a Determinant of Endoreduplication and Cell Expansion in Arabidopsis Plant Physiology, February 1, 2009; 149(2): 874 - 884. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Yamamoto, K. Kitamura, D. Hihara, Y. Hirose, S. Katsuyama, and Y. Hiraoka Spindle checkpoint activation at meiosis I advances anaphase II onset via meiosis-specific APC/C regulation J. Cell Biol., July 28, 2008; 182(2): 277 - 288. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Kimata, A. Matsuyama, K. Nagao, K. Furuya, C. Obuse, M. Yoshida, and M. Yanagida Diminishing HDACs by drugs or mutations promotes normal or abnormal sister chromatid separation by affecting APC/C and adherin J. Cell Sci., April 1, 2008; 121(7): 1107 - 1118. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C.-L. Liu, I-S. Yu, H.-W. Pan, S.-W. Lin, and H.-C. Hsu L2dtl Is Essential for Cell Survival and Nuclear Division in Early Mouse Embryonic Development J. Biol. Chem., January 12, 2007; 282(2): 1109 - 1118. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Alvarez and S. Moreno Fission yeast Tor2 promotes cell growth and represses cell differentiation J. Cell Sci., November 1, 2006; 119(21): 4475 - 4485. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Almeida, J. P. Bolanos, and S. Moreno Cdh1/Hct1-APC Is Essential for the Survival of Postmitotic Neurons J. Neurosci., September 7, 2005; 25(36): 8115 - 8121. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Ren, A. Feoktistova, W. H. McDonald, G. D. Haese, J. L. Morrell, and K. L. Gould Analysis of the Role of Phosphorylation in Fission Yeast Cdc13p/CyclinB Function J. Biol. Chem., April 15, 2005; 280(15): 14591 - 14596. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Castillo-Lluva, T. Garcia-Muse, and J. Perez-Martin A member of the Fizzy-related family of APC activators is regulated by cAMP and is required at different stages of plant infection by Ustilago maydis J. Cell Sci., August 15, 2004; 117(18): 4143 - 4156. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Seino, T. Kishi, H. Nishitani, and F. Yamao Two Ubiquitin-Conjugating Enzymes, UbcP1/Ubc4 and UbcP4/Ubc11, Have Distinct Functions for Ubiquitination of Mitotic Cyclin Mol. Cell. Biol., May 15, 2003; 23(10): 3497 - 3505. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Synnes, E. A. Nilssen, E. Boye, and B. Grallert A novel chk1-dependent G1/M checkpoint in fission yeast J. Cell Sci., September 15, 2002; 115(18): 3609 - 3618. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Cueille, E. Salimova, V. Esteban, M. Blanco, S. Moreno, A. Bueno, and V. Simanis Flp1, a fission yeast orthologue of the S. cerevisiae CDC14 gene, is not required for cyclin degradation or rum1p stabilisation at the end of mitosis J. Cell Sci., March 9, 2002; 114(14): 2649 - 2664. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. M. Castellano, J. C. del Pozo, E. Ramirez-Parra, S. Brown, and C. Gutierrez Expression and Stability of Arabidopsis CDC6 Are Associated with Endoreplication PLANT CELL, December 1, 2001; 13(12): 2671 - 2686. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. S. Sorensen, C. Lukas, E. R. Kramer, J.-M. Peters, J. Bartek, and J. Lukas A Conserved Cyclin-Binding Domain Determines Functional Interplay between Anaphase-Promoting Complex-Cdh1 and Cyclin A-Cdk2 during Cell Cycle Progression Mol. Cell. Biol., June 1, 2001; 21(11): 3692 - 3703. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. A. Blanco, L. Pelloquin, and S. Moreno Fission yeast mfr1 activates APC and coordinates meiotic nuclear division with sporulation J. Cell Sci., January 6, 2001; 114(11): 2135 - 2143. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Tournier and J. B.A. Millar A Role for the START Gene-specific Transcription Factor Complex in the Inactivation of Cyclin B and Cut2 Destruction Mol. Biol. Cell, October 1, 2000; 11(10): 3411 - 3424. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
A. Sveiczer, A. Csikasz-Nagy, B. Gyorffy, J. J. Tyson, and B. Novak Modeling the fission yeast cell cycle: Quantized cycle times in wee1- cdc25Delta mutant cells PNAS, July 5, 2000; 97(14): 7865 - 7870. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. D. Rudner, K. G. Hardwick, and A. W. Murray Cdc28 Activates Exit from Mitosis in Budding Yeast J. Cell Biol., June 26, 2000; 149(7): 1361 - 1376. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Matsuyama, N. Yabana, Y. Watanabe, and M. Yamamoto Schizosaccharomyces pombe Ste7p Is Required for Both Promotion and Withholding of the Entry to Meiosis Genetics, June 1, 2000; 155(2): 539 - 549. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
C. Martín-Castellanos, M. A. Blanco, J. M. de Prada, and S. Moreno The puc1 Cyclin Regulates the G1 Phase of the Fission Yeast Cell Cycle in Response to Cell Size Mol. Biol. Cell, February 1, 2000; 11(2): 543 - 554. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
H. Yamada, S Matsumoto, and T Matsumoto High dosage expression of a zinc finger protein, Grt1, suppresses a mutant of fission yeast slp1(+), a homolog of CDC20/p55CDC/Fizzy J. Cell Sci., January 11, 2000; 113(22): 3989 - 3999. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B Grallert, S. Kearsey, M Lenhard, C. Carlson, P Nurse, E Boye, and K Labib A fission yeast general translation factor reveals links between protein synthesis and cell cycle controls J. Cell Sci., January 4, 2000; 113(8): 1447 - 1458. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Murakami and P. Nurse Meiotic DNA replication checkpoint control in fission yeast Genes & Dev., October 1, 1999; 13(19): 2581 - 2593. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
W. Zachariae and K. Nasmyth Whose end is destruction: cell division and the anaphase-promoting complex Genes & Dev., August 15, 1999; 13(16): 2039 - 2058. [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
H. Yamamoto, K. Tsukahara, Y. Kanaoka, S. Jinno, and H. Okayama Isolation of a Mammalian Homologue of a Fission Yeast Differentiation Regulator Mol. Cell. Biol., May 1, 1999; 19(5): 3829 - 3841. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A Sveiczer, B Novak, and J. Mitchison Mitotic control in the absence of cdc25 mitotic inducer in fission yeast J. Cell Sci., January 4, 1999; 112(7): 1085 - 1092. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Tsukahara, H. Yamamoto, and H. Okayama An RNA Binding Protein Negatively Controlling Differentiation in Fission Yeast Mol. Cell. Biol., August 1, 1998; 18(8): 4488 - 4498. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Fang, H. Yu, and M. W. Kirschner The checkpoint protein MAD2 and the mitotic regulator CDC20 form a ternary complex with the anaphase-promoting complex to control anaphase initiation Genes & Dev., June 15, 1998; 12(12): 1871 - 1883. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
B. Stern and P. Nurse Cyclin B Proteolysis and the Cyclin-dependent Kinase Inhibitor rum1p Are Required for Pheromone-induced G1 Arrest in Fission Yeast Mol. Biol. Cell, June 1, 1998; 9(6): 1309 - 1321. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
K. Kitamura, H. Maekawa, and C. Shimoda Fission Yeast Ste9, a Homolog of Hct1/Cdh1 and Fizzy-related, Is a Novel Negative Regulator of Cell Cycle Progression during G1-Phase Mol. Biol. Cell, May 1, 1998; 9(5): 1065 - 1080. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
K. Lindner, J. Gregan, S. Montgomery, and S. E. Kearsey Essential Role of MCM Proteins in Premeiotic DNA Replication Mol. Biol. Cell, February 1, 2002; 13(2): 435 - 444. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||