|
|
|
|
Vol. 9, Issue 1, 1-14, January 1998
z Requires
Two Signals
Departments of Cellular and Molecular Pharmacology and Medicine and the Cardiovascular Research Institute, University of California, San Francisco, California 94143
Submitted August 7, 1997; Accepted October 10, 1997| |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Three covalent attachments anchor heterotrimeric G proteins to
cellular membranes: the
subunits are myristoylated and/or palmitoylated, whereas the
chain is prenylated. Despite the essential role of these modifications in membrane attachment, it is not
clear how they cooperate to specify G protein localization at the
plasma membrane, where the G protein relays signals from cell surface
receptors to intracellular effector molecules. To explore this
question, we studied the effects of mutations that prevent
myristoylation and/or palmitoylation of an epitope-labeled
subunit,
z. Wild-type
z (
z-WT)
localizes specifically at the plasma membrane. A mutant that
incorporates only myristate is mistargeted to intracellular membranes,
in addition to the plasma membrane, but transduces hormonal signals as
well as does
z-WT. Removal of the myristoylation site
produced a mutant
z that is located in the cytosol, is
not efficiently palmitoylated, and does not relay the hormonal signal.
Coexpression of 
with this myristoylation defective mutant
transfers it to the plasma membrane, promotes its palmitoylation, and
enables it to transmit hormonal signals. Pulse-chase experiments show
that the palmitate attached to this myristoylation-defective mutant
turns over much more rapidly than does palmitate on
z-WT, and that the rate of turnover is further
accelerated by receptor activation. In contrast, receptor activation
does not increase the slow rate of palmitate turnover on
z-WT. Together these results suggest that myristate and

promote stable association with membranes not only by providing hydrophobicity, but also by stabilizing attachment of palmitate. Moreover, palmitoylation confers on
z specific
localization at the plasma membrane.
| |
INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Heterotrimeric G proteins, composed of
,
, and
polypeptides, relay signals from cell surface receptors to
intracellular effector enzymes and ion channels (Neer, 1995
).
Ligand-bound receptor catalyzes exchange of GTP for GDP on the
subunit, followed by dissociation of
GTP from the
dimeric 
subunit. Each of these subunits can regulate effector
molecules. Hydrolysis of bound GTP turns off signaling by the
subunit and allows
GDP to reassociate with and
inactivate free 
. Lacking transmembrane segments, the G protein
trimer must nonetheless localize at the inner face of the plasma
membrane to transduce signals received from receptors for extracellular
stimuli.
Here, we report experiments designed to elucidate the mechanisms that
target G protein
subunits to the plasma membrane. Our experiments
extend work in many laboratories that have established the role of
covalently attached lipids in promoting the association of both
and

subunits with membranes (reviewed in Casey, 1995
; Wedegaertner
et al., 1995
; Resh, 1996
; Bhatnagar and Gordon, 1997
; Mumby,
1997
). Mutational removal of sites of lipid attachment greatly reduces
membrane avidity of G protein subunits (Jones et al., 1990
;
Mumby et al., 1990
, 1994
; Muntz et al., 1992
;
Wedegaertner et al., 1993
; Degtyarev et al.,
1994
; Hallak et al., 1994
; McCallum et al., 1995
;
Wilson and Bourne, 1995
). Isoprenyl groups attached to
chains allow

subunits to associate with membranes. Members of the
i family (
i1,
i2,
i3,
z, and
o) are
myristoylated on the N-terminal glycine residue and palmitoylated on
the adjacent cysteine (Wedegaertner et al., 1995
).
Several other
subunits are palmitoylated near their N termini, but
are not myristoylated (Wedegaertner et al., 1995
).
Myristate and palmitate differ in hydrophobicity and in the relative
stability of their covalent links to proteins. Although myristate is
linked to proteins by a stable amide bond, myristoylated proteins
associate reversibly with membranes and dissociate from them rather
easily (Peitzsch and McLaughlin, 1993
; Bigay et al., 1994
;
Boman and Kahn, 1995
; McLaughlin and Aderem, 1995
), at least in part
because this 14-carbon fatty acid provides insufficient hydrophobicity
to anchor a protein tightly to membranes (Peitzsch and McLaughlin,
1993
). The greater hydrophobicity of palmitate's 16 carbons promotes
tighter association with membranes (Shahinian and Silvius, 1995
), but
its bond to cysteine can be cleaved by cellular thioesterases (Camp and
Hofmann, 1993
; Mumby, 1997
), providing a potential handle for
regulating association of a protein with membranes (Milligan et
al., 1995
; Wedegaertner et al., 1995
; Mumby, 1997
).
Activated
s, for example, is more rapidly
depalmitoylated (Degtyarev et al., 1993
; Mumby, et
al., 1994
; Wedegaertner and Bourne, 1994
) and can translocate to
the cytosol (Wedegaertner et al., 1996
).
In addition to providing hydrophobicity, lipid modifications increase
the affinities of G protein subunits for each other and for effector
molecules (Wedegaertner et al., 1995
). Myristate on
i proteins (Jones et al., 1990
; Linder
et al., 1991
) and palmitate on
s (Iiri
et al., 1996
) increase the affinity for binding 
and
nonmyristoylated
i fails to inhibit adenylyl cyclase
(Taussig et al., 1993
). Similarly, prenylation of
increases the affinity of 
for
(Iñiguez-Lluhi et
al., 1992
) and is necessary for regulation of adenylyl cyclase
(Iñiguez-Lluhi et al., 1992
) and phospholipase C
(Dietrich et al., 1994
) by 
.
How do G proteins target themselves to one cell membrane rather than
another? Ras proteins and kinases in the Src family provide insight
into the requirements for specific membrane targeting. These proteins
combine two membrane-binding signals, either two lipids or one lipid
plus a cluster of basic residues, to effect stable target membrane
binding (Hancock et al., 1990
; Resh, 1994
, 1996
). To address
the role of dual lipid modifications as signals for plasma membrane
localization of G protein
subunits, we studied a member of the
i subfamily,
z, in which mutations
removed sites for attachment of myristate, palmitate, or both. Our
results support a model in which palmitate provides plasma membrane
selectivity, whereas myristate and 
promote and stabilize both
palmitoylation and membrane attachment.
| |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Materials
Glu-Glu (EE) monoclonal antibody was obtained from Onyx
Pharmaceuticals (Richmond, CA), monoclonal antibody against
hemagglutinin (HA) was obtained from Berkeley Antibody Co. (Berkeley,
CA), and polyclonal antibodies against
2 were obtained
from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Santa Cruz, CA). Rabbit anti-mannosidase
II was kindly provided by Kelley Moremen (University of Georgia,
Athens, GA). Pertussis toxin (PTX) was obtained from
List Biologicals (Campbell, CA), quinpirole was obtained from Research
Biochemicals (Natick, MA), and streptolysin O (SLO) was obtained from
Murex Diagnostics (Norcross, GA). Fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC) and
Texas Red-conjugated secondary antibodies were obtained from Jackson
Immunoresearch (West Grove, PA) and Texas Red-phalloidin and unlabeled
phalloidin were obtained from Molecular Probes (Eugene, OR). All
isotopes were from DuPont-New England Nuclear (Wilmington, DE).
Expression Vectors
cDNAs in pcDNA1 encoding
z-WT,
z-G2A,
z-C3A, and
z-G2AC3A, all with the EE epitope tag, were as described
(Wilson and Bourne, 1995
). To generate stable cell lines the
z-coding sequences were subcloned into pcDNA3 as
EcoRI fragments. pHA-mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK)
DNA was a gift from J. Pouysségur (CNRS, Nice, France),
2 and
1 DNAs were gifts from Janet
Robishaw, and D2 receptor DNA was a gift from Olivier
Civelli.
Cell Culture and Transfection
CHO-K1 cells were propagated in minimal essential medium
(MEM
) with 10% fetal bovine serum. DNA was transiently transfected using the adenovirus method of Forsayeth and Garcia (1994)
. Plasmid DNAs were added to a transfection mix consisting of serum-free MEM
,
80 µg/ml DEAE-dextran, and a 1:20 dilution of adenovirus stock. This
solution was added to subconfluent cells on dishes. Following a 1.5-h
incubation cells were shocked with 10% DMSO in phosphate-buffered
saline (PBS) and refed with normal serum-containing medium. The
following DNA amounts/106 cells were used: 1 µg
D2R, 0.5 µg
z, 0.2 µg
1,
and 0.2 µg
2.
Stable cell lines were generated by transfecting Chinese hamster ovary (CHO)-K1 cells with pcDNA3 constructs. Two days later cells were reseeded at dilutions of 1:100 and 1:500 and transferred into medium containing G418 at 600 µg/ml to select for stable transformants. Serial dilution of the stable pool was used to obtain cell lines derived from single cells. Stable cell lines were maintained in G418-containing medium.
Measurement of MAPK Activity
Cells were transfected in 6-well plates at 1.5 × 106 cells/well, transferred to serum-free medium after
24 h, and assayed after 48 h. Cells were treated with PTX
(100 ng/ml) for 4 h before agonist stimulation. Treated cells were
washed once with cold PBS and lysed in buffer containing 1.0% Triton
X-100. Insoluble material was removed by microcentrifugation, 5 µg of
12CA5 antibody were added to the supernatant, and samples were
incubated at 4°C for 1 h. Protein A agarose (Life Technologies,
Gaithersburg, MD) was added and samples were tumbled for 1 h.
Immunoprecipitates were washed twice with lysis buffer and twice with
kinase buffer as described (Faure and Bourne, 1995
). MAPK activity was
measured using myelin basic protein as substrate in an in vitro kinase reaction. Samples were run on 14% gels and dried, and radioactivity was quantified with a PhosphorImager (Molecular Dynamics, Sunnyvale, CA).
Cell Fractionation
Four 100-mm plates of CHO-K1 cells were trypsinized and spun
down 48 h after transfection. Pellets were resuspended in 1 ml of
lysis buffer (40 mM Tris, pH 8.0, 1 mM EDTA, 2 mM MgCl2, 2 mM
-mercaptoethanol) plus protease inhibitors (1 mM phenylmethyl sulfonyl fluoride, 1 µg/ml pepstatin, 2 µg/ml leupeptin, 4 µg/ml aprotinin) and passed 15 times through a 27-gauge needle. Following a
low-speed spin to remove unlysed cells and nuclei, supernatant fractions were separated into soluble and particulate fractions by
centrifugation for 30 min at 150,000 × g.
Palmitate Labeling and Turnover
One hundred-millimeter plates of CHO-K1 cells were incubated for
2 h with MEM
containing 5 mM sodium pyruvate and 0.75 mCi/ml [3H]palmitate. Cells were washed with PBS and incubated
for 1 h in 1 ml of lysis buffer (40 mM Tris, pH 8.0, 1 mM EGTA, 2 mM MgCl2, 1% cholate) plus protease inhibitors. Following
microcentrifugation at 14,000 rpm,
z was
immunoprecipitated from the supernatant fraction with the EE monoclonal
antibody (mAb) as described below. Samples were run on 10% gels. To
determine hydroxylamine sensitivity, duplicate, fixed gels were treated
for 12 h either with 1 M hydroxylamine (pH 7.0) or with 1 M Tris
(pH 7.0). Gels were processed for fluorography with Amplify (Amersham,
Arlington Heights, IL).
For measurement of palmitate turnover, cells were washed twice with
chase medium (MEM
plus 5 mM sodium pyruvate plus 100 µM palmitic
acid) after labeling. Cells were then treated with chase medium with or
without 10 µM quinpirole and incubated at 37°C. Depalmitoylation
was terminated by washing cells with ice-cold PBS.
Immunofluorescence Localization
CHO-K1 cells were grown on glass coverslips and fixed with 4%
formaldehyde in PBS. For immunofluorescence, all incubations (except
the final wash) were in PBS plus 5% nonfat milk plus 1% Triton X-100.
Fixed cells were blocked for 30 min in this buffer prior to a 1-h
incubation with primary antibody (anti-EE mAb, 20 µg/ml; rabbit
anti-mannosidase II, 1:1000; rabbit anti-
2, 2 µg/ml).
After three 10-min washes, cells were incubated with the appropriate
secondary antibody (donkey anti-mouse FITC conjugate and donkey
anti-rabbit Texas Red conjugate) at 1:100 dilution for 30 min. The
final three washes were in PBS plus 1% Triton X-100 and coverslips
were mounted on glass slides with ProLong Antifade (Molecular Probes,
Eugene, OR). For actin staining, Texas Red-phalloidin was included in
the secondary antibody incubation.
Immunofluorescence microscopy was performed with a confocal laser scanning microscope (MRC-1000, Bio-Rad Labs, Hercules, CA) using FITC and Texas Red filters. Images were processed with Adobe Photoshop.
For SLO permeabilization, cells on coverslips were incubated for 10 min at room temperature with 1 U/ml SLO in 10 mM MES (pH 6.1), 140 mM KCl, 3 mM MgCl2, 2 mM EGTA, 0.3 M sucrose, and 1 µg/ml phalloidin (cytoskeletal stabilizer). Cells were fixed immediately after treatment.
Western Blotting and Immunoprecipitation
For Western blotting, proteins were transferred to polyvinylidene difluoride membrane (Bio-Rad Labs) and probed with EE mAb at 3 µg/ml. Secondary antibodies with conjugated horseradish peroxidase were used at 1:10,000 dilution and bands were visualized by ECL (DuPont-New England Nuclear).
For immunoprecipitation, Triton X-100 and SDS were added to cholate extracts of cells, to final concentrations of 1% and 0.5%, respectively. EE mAb (3 µg) was added and samples were tumbled for 1 h at 4°C. Protein G-Sepharose beads (Pharmacia, Pistcataway, NJ) were added and samples were tumbled for 1 h. Pelleted beads were washed three times with lysis buffer plus 1% Triton X-100 and 0.5% SDS. Beads were resuspended in SDS-polyacrylamide sample buffer.
| |
RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Most experiments were performed with transiently transfected
CHO-K1 cells expressing epitope-tagged
z subunits
(Wilson and Bourne, 1995
), including
z-WT (epitope
tagged only),
z-G2A (myristoylation site mutated to
alanine),
z-C3A (palmitoylation site mutated to
alanine), and
z-G2AC3A (alanine substituted at both
sites). The epitope tag did not disrupt signaling function or membrane attachment of
z-WT (Wilson and Bourne, 1995
). With
z we have shown (Wilson and Bourne, 1995
), as have other
investigators with several
i family members (Mumby
et al., 1990
, 1994
; Degtyarev et al., 1994
;
Hallak et al., 1994
), that mutating the lipid modification sites abolishes incorporation of the corresponding lipid, and that in
intact cells association of the G2A or the C3A mutant with membranes is
completely lacking or impaired, respectively.
Membrane Attachment and Function
To assess signaling properties by the
z mutants, we
assayed a positive signal, activation of the MAPK cascade. Plasmids
encoding the four
z proteins were separately and
transiently transfected into CHO-K1 cells along with plasmids encoding
the D2 dopamine receptor (D2R), which activates
z, and epitope-tagged MAPK (HA-MAPK) to allow assay of
MAPK activity after immunoprecipitation. PTX treatment inhibits
D2R-mediated activation of MAPK in cells not transfected
with
z (Figure 1),
presumably because the toxin inactivates all
i family
members except
z; thus, D2R-mediated signals
in PTX-treated cells reflect activation of
z. In cells
expressing
z-WT, quinpirole, a D2R agonist,
stimulated HA-MAPK activity in a PTX-insensitive manner (Figure 1). In
cells expressing
z-G2A or
z-G2AC3A,
quinpirole did not activate HA-MAPK, whereas HA-MAPK activation in
cells expressing
z-C3A was comparable to that mediated by
z-WT (Figure 1). Abilities of the
z
mutants to mediate agonist activation of MAPK paralleled our previous
observations of their abilities to regulate a different effector
pathway, inhibition of adenylyl cyclase (Wilson and Bourne, 1995
), with
a subtle difference:
z-C3A inhibited adenylyl cyclase
even in the absence of agonist stimulation, to a much greater degree
than
z-WT (Wilson and Bourne, 1995
), whereas this mutant
caused activation of MAPK activity only in response to agonist (Figure
1). We do not know the mechanism responsible for this apparent
discrepancy, which does not affect inferences we draw from the data
presented below.
|
The same
z mutants that fail to signal (Figure 1) also
fail to associate with membranes (Figure
2A). Separation of CHO-K1 cell
homogenates into particulate (P100) and soluble (S100) fractions shows
that
z-WT is associated exclusively with the particulate fraction and that
z-C3A partitions into both fractions,
whereas
z-G2A and
z-G2AC3A are almost
entirely soluble (Figure 2A).
|
Despite an intact palmitoylation site,
z-G2A does not
incorporate palmitate. Metabolic labeling with
[3H]palmitate shows that
z-WT is
palmitoylated, while none of the mutants, including
z-G2A, incorporate palmitate (Figure
3). These results confirm previous
reports (Degtyarev et al., 1994
; Hallak et al.,
1994
; Mumby et al., 1994
; Wilson and Bourne, 1995
) that G2A
mutants of
i family members incorporate neither
myristate nor palmitate.
|
Immunofluorescence Microscopy Reveals Distinct Patterns
We examined the subcellular localization of both stably and
transiently expressed
z mutants by indirect
immunofluorescence. The two kinds of expression produced identical
staining patterns, thus ruling out artifacts that might result from
short-term overexpression. The epitope tag allowed
specific detection of the mutants with the EE antibody; very low
background staining is seen in untransfected cells (Figure
4A).
|
Immunofluorescence revealed that
z without palmitate is
partially mistargeted to intracellular membranes, whereas
z mutants without myristate or without sites for either
myristate or palmitate do not associate with membranes or with any
other structure in the cytoplasm.
z-WT shows
characteristic plasma membrane localization, with uniform staining
across the cell surface that is enhanced between adjacent cells (Figure
4B). A plasma membrane protein, Na+-K+-ATPase,
shows the same pattern (our unpublished results).
z-C3A, which incorporates myristate but not palmitate, shows a more complex distribution pattern. Unlike
z-WT,
z-C3A
associates with internal structures clustered around the nucleus
(Figure 4D). This partial mistargeting of
z-C3A
significantly diminishes but does not abolish its association with the
plasma membrane (Figure 4D). The perinuclear and plasma membrane
staining pattern is seen with both transiently and stably transfected
z-C3A (our unpublished results).
z-G2A (Figure 4C) and
z-G2AC3A (Figure
4E) show no plasma membrane staining; instead, these mutants are
diffusely distributed throughout the cytosol and nucleus.
Immunofluorescence of cells treated with SLO confirmed that
z-G2A is cytosolic, whereas
z-WT and
z-C3A are membrane associated. SLO, a bacterial
cytolysin, specifically perforates the plasma membrane, allowing
cytoplasmic proteins to escape but leaving intracellular membranes
intact (Miller and Moore, 1991
). SLO treatment abolishes the apparent
cytosolic distribution of
z-G2A, leaving only the
nuclear staining (Figure 5, C and E).
z-G2AC3A shows an identical pattern after SLO treatment
(our unpublished results). In contrast, SLO treatment does not affect
the distribution of
z-WT (Figure 5A) or of
z-C3A (Figure 5G). The latter result (Figure 5G)
confirms that the staining pattern seen with
z-C3A represents
z associated not only with internal cellular
membranes but also with the plasma membrane (in addition to the
internal staining, note enhanced staining between adjacent cells).
Staining of actin filaments (Texas Red-palloidin) (Figure 5, B, D, and H) and cis-Golgi (mannosidase II antibody; Figure 5F) shows
that cellular structures other than the nucleus are intact after SLO treatment.
|
Effects of Overexpressing 
What role does 
play in targeting of
z and
anchoring it to membranes? Overexpression of 
with
z-G2A and
z-G2AC3A revealed that 
facilitates palmitoylation, membrane association, and receptor-mediated signaling of
z. As shown (Figure 1),
z-G2A and
z-G2AC3A fail to mediate MAPK
stimulation following activation of the D2R. In contrast,
coexpression of 
with these mutants rescues the ability of
z-G2A to signal (Figure
6). Quinpirole stimulates HA-MAPK
activity only when
z-G2A is coexpressed with 
.
z-G2AC3A fails to signal regardless of whether 
is
coexpressed (Figure 6).
|
To determine whether coexpression of 
affects the ability of
z to associate with membranes, cells expressing each of
the
z proteins with or without 
were separated
into S100 and P100 fractions. 
coexpression increases the amount
of
z associated with the particulate fraction (Figure
2). This effect is especially marked in the case of
z-G2A, which is entirely cytosolic when expressed alone
but associates significantly with the particulate fraction when 
is coexpressed; this shift to the particulate fraction parallels the
effect of 
in restoring to
z-G2A the ability to
transmit hormonal signals (Figure 6).
z-G2AC3A, which fails to signal even in the presence of coexpressed 
(Figure 6),
also shifts to the P100 fraction in cells coexpressing 
, but
consistently to a lower extent than does
z-G2A (Figure
2).
Does membrane association promoted by 
affect the palmitoylation
state of
z-G2A? Coexpression of 
greatly increases
palmitoylation of
z-G2A, but palmitate labeling of
z-WT is unchanged by excess 
(Figure
7A). All of the
[3H]palmitate on
z-G2A is found in the
particulate fraction (Figure 7B), in keeping with the idea that
palmitate plays a role in membrane association.
|

Targets
z to the Plasma Membrane
Immunofluorescence microscopy of cells transiently coexpressing
z mutants and 
revealed that 
targets
z to the plasma membrane.
z-G2A shows two
different staining patterns, depending on whether 
is
coexpressed. As observed in stable cell lines (Figure 4C),
z-G2A alone localizes diffusely throughout the cytosol and nucleus with the intensity of fluorescent signal diminishing toward
the edges where the cell is thinnest (Figure
8A). In cells coexpressing 
,
however,
z-G2A is localized over the entire cell
surface, extending uniformly to the cell edges, as well as in the
nucleus (Figure 8B). The nuclear staining probably reflects solubility
of a fraction of
z-G2A, as shown by subcellular
fractionation (Figure 2A). To confirm association of
z-G2A with the plasma membrane, cells were treated with
SLO. Although SLO treatment abolishes cytosolic staining of
z-G2A expressed without exogenous 
(Figure 8C),
z-G2A coexpressed with 
remains associated with
the plasma membrane, and no staining of intracellular membranes is
observed (Figure 8E).
z-G2AC3A coexpressed with 
shows a pattern similar to that seen with
z-G2A, but
with apparently less robust staining at the plasma membrane (our
unpublished results).
|
Costaining for
and
revealed that
z and 
localize in distinct but partially overlapping locations. Cells
expressing either
z-WT plus 
or
z-G2A plus 
were stained for
z,
using the anti-EE mAb, and for
, using a
2 specific
polyclonal antibody. Although the
z subunits associate
predominantly with the plasma membrane (Figure
9, A and C),
subunits localize to
extensive perinuclear structures in the cytoplasm in addition to the
plasma membrane (Figure 9, B and D). Other observations support the
inference that 
subunits stably localize in at least two cellular
locations: First, polyclonal antisera show identical staining patterns
for endogenous
and
(our unpublished results). In addition,
cells coexpressing recombinant
2 and a tagged
1 subunit show overlapping staining, seen on the plasma
membrane and intracellular membranes (our unpublished results).
|
Myristate Stabilizes Palmitate on
z
Is the palmitoylation state of
z dynamically
regulated, as reported (Wedegaertner and Bourne, 1994
) in the case of
s, which is rapidly depalmitoylated upon activation?
Does the adjacent myristate on
z affect palmitate
turnover? We measured the rate of depalmitoylation of
z-WT, with or without D2R stimulation, by
metabolic labeling with [3H]palmitate followed by a chase
with excess unlabeled palmitate. Unlike previous observations
(Wedegaertner and Bourne, 1994
) with
s, depalmitoylation
of
z-WT is quite slow and is not increased by treatment
with agonist (Figure 10A). To address
whether stability of the palmitate linkage depends upon myristate, we
coexpressed 
with
z-G2A to induce palmitoylation
and membrane association. Compared with
z-WT,
z-G2A loses its palmitate label much more rapidly;
agonist treatment greatly accelerates this rate (Figure 10B). Taken
together, these results suggest that myristate stabilizes the palmitate
on
z-WT; removing myristate produces an
z
that behaves like
s.
|
| |
DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In lieu of amino acid sequences that traverse the membrane
bilayer, many proteins use covalently attached lipids as anchors for
mooring to cellular membranes. Accumulating evidence indicates that the
attached lipid may provide not only a hydrophobic anchor but also a
signal that specifies localization of the protein to a distinct
membrane compartment in the cell. In many cases, two attached lipids
cooperate to trap the protein in a membrane compartment. As outlined by
several investigators (Cadwallader et al., 1994
; Shahinian
and Silvius, 1995
; Resh, 1996
), the two-lipid bilayer-trapping mechanism involves three key elements: 1) Together lipids A and B moor
a protein much more securely to the membrane bilayer than does either
lipid alone; thus, attachment of lipid B to a protein that is already
modified by lipid A can trap the protein on the bilayer. 2) A membrane
compartment becomes the target for localization of a protein when the
enzyme for attaching lipid B is itself restricted to that compartment.
3) Lipid A both promotes attachment of lipid B and reinforces tight
association with the membrane.
Our experiments suggest that for
z palmitate functions
as lipid B, providing plasma membrane specificity, whereas myristate, lipid A, promotes palmitoylation and stable membrane association. As an
extension of the two-signal hypothesis, we show that the signal
provided by lipid A can be provided by an interacting protein, in that

can substitute for myristate to allow palmitoylation-dependent trapping of
z on the plasma membrane. We propose that

similarly provides signal A for
subunits that are
palmitoylated but not myristoylated, such as
s,
q,
12, and
13.
Palmitate Can Serve as Lipid B
Two observations support the inference that palmitate is the
signal that specifies plasma membrane localization of
z:
1)
z-C3A, which incorporates myristate but not
palmitate, partially mislocalizes to intracellular membranes (Figure
4D). 2) When coexpressed with 
,
z-G2A is
palmitoylated and associates specifically with the plasma membrane, as
indicated by immunofluorescence staining in SLO-treated cells (Figure
8E); palmitoylation and the consequent association of this mutant with
the plasma membrane restore its ability to transduce hormonal signals.
Palmitate also provides the specific signal for association of Ras
proteins and Src kinases with the plasma membrane (Hancock et
al., 1990
; Cadwallader et al., 1994
; Schroeder et
al., 1996
; van't Hof and Resh, 1997
; Wolven et al.,
1997
; Zlatkine et al., 1997
). In the case of H-ras, a prenyl
group at the carboxyl terminus normally serves as lipid A, and
attachment of palmitate as lipid B is required for targeting to the
plasma membrane (Hancock et al., 1990
; Cadwallader et
al., 1994
). Removal of the palmitoylation site on H-ras, combined
with the addition of an N-terminal myristate, causes the protein to be
mistargeted to numerous membranes (Cadwallader et al.,
1994
); palmitoylation in combination with either myristate or a prenyl
group, however, causes H-ras to localize at the plasma membrane
(Cadwallader et al., 1994
). Similarly, synthetic
cell-permeant myristoylated peptides are rapidly palmitoylated and
localize at the plasma membrane when added to cultured cells, but only if the peptide contains a palmitoylation site resembling the sites in
proteins (G protein
subunits and Src kinases) that are modified by
palmitate as well as myristate (Schroeder et al., 1996
). Fyn kinase, which is both myristoylated and palmitoylated, targets rapidly
and efficiently to the plasma membrane following synthesis (van't Hof
and Resh, 1997
). Fyn mutants that are only myristoylated, however, move
slowly to membranes (van't Hof and Resh, 1997
) and mislocalize to
intracellular membranes (Wolven et al., 1997
).
It is likely that palmitate is attached to
z, Fyn
kinase, and H-ras by enzymes that are themselves restricted to the
plasma membrane. Indeed, a recently described palmitoyltransferase
(Dunphy et al., 1996
), partially purified on the basis of
its ability to palmitoylate G protein
subunits, is enriched in
plasma membrane fractions. Our observations with
z
mutants are consistent with the idea that palmitoylation occurs at the
plasma membrane. Thus, the G2A mutant of
z, as
previously reported for
i (Degtyarev et al.,
1994
), is soluble and fails to incorporate palmitate, but coexpression
with 
partially restores association with membranes and
palmitoylation. The inference that palmitoylation of
z-G2A occurs specifically at the plasma membrane accords
with immunolocalization of the mutant and its ability to transduce
hormonal signals when coexpressed with 
. Moreover, 
is
found in internal membranes as well as the plasma membrane (Figure 9, B
and D), but delivers
z-G2A to the plasma membrane only,
as would be the case if 
provides the nonspecific membrane
association signal (replacing lipid A, myristate), whereas lipid B,
palmitate, provides the specific signal. Similarly, two different
lipids can serve as lipid A for H-ras (Cadwallader et al.,
1994
): Mutations that prevent prenylation of H-ras inhibit its
palmitoylation (Hancock et al., 1989
), but a myristoylation
site at the N terminus can substitute for the prenyl group in
permitting modification by palmitate (Cadwallader et al.,
1994
).
Signal A Promotes Palmitoylation
An essential feature of the two-lipid bilayer-trapping mechanism
is that the nonspecific signal, lipid A, promotes and stabilizes attachment of lipid B. How does myristate
or its substitute,
coexpressed 

facilitate palmitoylation and stable trapping of
z and other G protein
subunits at the plasma
membrane? Available evidence suggests that myristate and 
not
only promote the forward palmitoylation reaction but also stabilize the
link between palmitate and the
subunit. Myristate and 
could
promote palmitoylation indirectly by delivering
subunits to
membranes and increasing the concentration of protein substrate
accessible to a membrane-bound palmitoyltransferase. More direct roles
for 
and myristate are suggested by the observations that: 1) A
palmitoyltransferase enriched in plasma membrane fractions prefers as a
substrate an
subunit complexed to 
in comparison to the free
subunit (Dunphy et al., 1996
). 2) A second
palmitoyltransferase activity, recently characterized (Berthiaume and
Resh, 1995
), attaches palmitate only to myristoylated proteins,
including G protein
subunits.
Other observations indicate that myristate and 
also inhibit
depalmitoylation of
z. Thus,
z-WT is
depalmitoylated much more slowly than is
z-G2A, which is
modified by palmitate but not myristate, in cells coexpressing 
(Figure 10). Moreover, receptor activation increases the rate of
turnover of the palmitate attached to
s (Wedegaertner
and Bourne, 1994
) and of the palmitate attached to
z-G2A
in cells that coexpress 
(Figure 10). Because activation of the
subunit causes it to dissociate from 
, these effects of
receptor activation on palmitate turnover suggest that release of

increases the susceptibility of
to attack by cellular thioesterases. Indeed, pure 
inhibits depalmitoylation of pure
s by an esterase in vitro (Iiri et al.,
1996
). Three-dimensional structures of G protein trimers (Wall et
al., 1995
; Lambright et al., 1996
) suggest a possible
explanation for these effects of 
and myristate. The extreme N
terminus of the
subunit, to which both myristate and palmitate are
attached, is located in close proximity to the 
dimer and to its
prenylation site at the C terminus of the
polypeptide. The
proximity of two additional modifying lipids may limit the
accessibility of palmitate to esterases, thus stabilizing its
attachment to the protein.
Our observations with
z are consistent with the
bilayer-trapping mechanism for specific membrane localization as
proposed by other investigators (Shahinian and Silvius, 1995
; Resh,
1996
). After myristate is attached (cotranslationally, in the
cytoplasm),
z can associate, weakly and nonspecifically,
with any cellular membrane. Transient binding of myristoylated
z to the plasma membrane and association with 
make
z a potential substrate for posttranslational
palmitoylation; attachment of palmitate traps the protein at the plasma
membrane (Shahinian and Silvius, 1995
; Schroeder et al.,
1996
) rather than at other membranes, presumably because the
G
-specific transferase that catalyzes palmitoylation is itself
located at the plasma membrane (Dunphy et al., 1996
).
Ultimately, plasma membrane association of
z is maintained through strong but nonspecific hydrophobicity provided by
both myristate and palmitate. A similar pathway has been described for
Fyn kinase (van't Hof and Resh, 1997
); synthesis and myristoylation of
Fyn in the cytoplasm is followed by rapid palmitoylation and association with the plasma membrane (van't Hof and Resh, 1997
).
Several groups have reported localization of G protein
subunits and
several other signaling proteins to specialized regions of the plasma
membrane, including caveolae and/or detergent-insoluble complexes
(Sargiacomo et al., 1993
; Mineo et al., 1996
). In
many cases, localization to these microdomains appears to depend on palmitoylation (Shenoy-Scaria et al., 1994
;
García-Cardeña et al., 1996
and references in
Resh, 1996
; Mumby, 1997
). Palmitoylation-dependent targeting to a
microdomain of the plasma membrane may explain the ability of
coexpressed 
to restore signaling function to
z-G2A but not to
z-G2AC3A. Although

delivers some fraction of both proteins to membranes, only
z-G2A is palmitoylated. Although our experiments did not
address this issue, perhaps palmitate targets
z-G2A to
plasma membrane microdomains where signaling can take place.
Other G protein
Subunits
Although
z and other members of the
i family are both myristoylated and palmitoylated, the N
termini of other
subunits,
s,
q,
11,
12, and
13, are
palmitoylated but lack sites for myristoylation. In the absence of
myristate, a source of hydrophobicity and a stabilizer of
palmitoylation, how does palmitate become attached to these other
subunits? The mere presence of a palmitoylation site does not suffice
for membrane attachment. For example, an
s/Fyn kinase
chimera, in which residues from the N terminus of
s
(including its palmitoylation site) replace the N-terminal myristoylation and palmitoylation sites of Fyn, is not palmitoylated and does not associate with membranes (van't Hof and Resh, 1997
). If a
palmitoylation site alone is not enough, how does an
subunit lacking myristate avail itself of palmitate and localize at the plasma
membrane?
We propose that the 
subunit performs the missing functions of
lipid A for such an
subunit. In this proposed
mechanism, exactly as in the case of
z-G2A, association
of 
with nonmyristoylated
subunits promotes their
palmitoylation and stable association with the plasma membrane; the
necessary hydrophobicity is supplied by the prenyl group of 
,
whereas association of 
with the N terminus of the
subunit
helps to stabilize attached palmitate.
The presence or absence of myristate on an
subunit may determine
its ability to dissociate from the plasma membrane upon hormonal
activation. Activation of
s, a nonmyristoylated protein, accelerates its depalmitoylation (Mumby et al., 1994
;
Wedegaertner and Bourne, 1994
) and causes its translocation from the
plasma membrane into cytosol (Wedegaertner et al., 1996
).
GTP-induced dissociation of
s from 
probably
accounts for both of these effects, as suggested previously
(Wedegaertner and Bourne, 1994
; Iiri et al., 1996
;
Wedegaertner, et al., 1996
). Rapid depalmitoylation and
membrane dissociation are not general phenomena for G protein
subunits, as shown by the very slow rate of palmitate turnover on
z-WT, with or without agonist stimulation (Figure 10A).
The presence of myristate may ensure that activated
z
remains palmitoylated and bound to the plasma membrane even when bound
GTP reduces its affinity for 
. Indeed, neither receptor
activation nor mutational activation caused detectable translocation of
z-WT into the cytosol (our unpublished results).
How do G protein 
subunits localize at the plasma membrane? In
terms of the two-signal bilayer-trapping mechanism, the prenyl group on
the
polypeptide probably serves as lipid A for 
, as does the
C terminal farnesyl modification for H-ras (Cadwallader et
al., 1994
). Lipid A provides a nonspecific hydrophobic signal for
attachment to membranes, but what about lipid B? For 
, an obvious
candidate for this role is the G protein
subunit; in this case,
palmitate attached to the
subunit would play the role of lipid B,
targeting 
to the plasma membrane via its association with the
subunit. Thus, the affinities of
and 
for associating with one another would allow each protein to participate in targeting the other to the plasma membrane

by supplying lipid A (a prenyl group) and
by supplying lipid B, palmitate. In keeping with the
idea that
helps to retain 
at the plasma membrane, genetic deletion of the
subunit in S. cerevisiae shifts 
to cytosol and internal membranes of the yeast cell, markedly reducing
its concentration at the plasma membrane (Hirschman et al.,
1997
). In this scenario,
and 
subunits recipro