|
|
|
|
Vol. 9, Issue 1, 223-235, January 1998
Weis Center for Research, Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine, Danville, Pennsylvania 17822-2616
Submitted August 26, 1997; Accepted October 31, 1997| |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Posttranslational modification of Rab proteins by
geranylgeranyltransferase type II requires that they first bind to Rab
escort protein (REP). Following prenylation, REP is postulated to
accompany the modified GTPase to its specific target membrane. REP
binds preferentially to Rab proteins that are in the GDP state, but the
specific structural domains involved in this interaction have not been
defined. In p21 Ras, the
2 helix of the Switch 2 domain undergoes a
major conformational change upon GTP hydrolysis. Therefore, we
hypothesized that the corresponding region in Rab1B might play a key
role in the interaction with REP. Introduction of amino acid
substitutions (I73N, Y78D, and A81D) into the putative
2 helix of
Myc-tagged Rab1B prevented prenylation of the recombinant protein in
cell-free assays, whereas mutations in the
3 and
4 helices did
not. Additionally, upon transient expression in transfected HEK-293
cells, the Myc-Rab1B
2 helix mutants were not efficiently prenylated
as determined by incorporation of [3H]mevalonate.
Metabolic labeling studies using [32P]orthophosphate
indicated that the poor prenylation of the Rab1B
2 helix mutants was
not directly correlated with major disruptions in guanine nucleotide
binding or intrinsic GTPase activity. Finally, gel filtration analysis
of cytosolic fractions from 293 cells that were coexpressing T7
epitope-tagged REP with various Myc-Rab1B constructs revealed that
mutations in the
2 helix of Rab1B prevented the association of
nascent (i.e., nonprenylated) Rab1B with REP. These data indicate that
the Switch 2 domain of Rab1B is a key structural determinant for REP
interaction and that nucleotide-dependent conformational changes in
this region are largely responsible for the selective interaction of
REP with the GDP-bound form of the Rab substrate.
| |
INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Small Ras-related GTP-binding proteins encoded by the
rab genes participate in the regulation of vesicular
transport within specific segments of the exocytic and endocytic
pathways in mammalian cells. More than 30 different Rab proteins have
been identified, and many of these have been localized to discrete
subcellular compartments (Simons and Zerial, 1993
; Pfeffer, 1994
).
Although the exact role of Rab proteins in the vesicular transport
machinery has not been completely defined, a widely accepted model
envisions that each Rab protein cycles on and off distinct donor and
acceptor membranes in conjunction with changes in its guanine
nucleotide state (Novick and Brennwald, 1993
; Nuoffer and Balch, 1994
).
According to this view, the cycle begins with the inactive GDP-bound
form of the Rab protein residing in a cytoplasmic complex with a
carrier protein termed Rab GDP-dissociation inhibitor (GDI). GDI
delivers the Rab protein to a budding transport vesicle, whereupon GDI is released through the action of a GDI displacement factor
(Dirac-Svejestrup et al., 1997
) and exchange of GTP for GDP
is stimulated by a Rab-specific guanine nucleotide exchange factor
(Horiuchi et al., 1995
; Wada et al., 1997
). The
activated Rab protein remains associated with the transport vesicle and
facilitates docking and fusion with the correct acceptor compartment,
possibly through interaction with the SNARE complex (Sogaard et
al., 1994
). GTP hydrolysis occurs in concert with the latter
events, returning the Rab protein to the inactive GDP-bound state.
Finally, the GDP-bound Rab protein is removed from the acceptor
membrane by GDI and becomes available for another round of vesicle
transport.
Posttranslational modification of Rab carboxyl-terminal cysteines by
one or two 20-carbon geranylgeranyl groups (i.e, prenylation) is
critical for at least two aspects of the foregoing functional cycle:
association of Rab proteins with cellular membranes (Khosravi-Far et al., 1991
; Overmeyer and Maltese, 1992
) and formation of
a stable complex with GDI (Musha et al., 1992
; Soldati
et al., 1993
; Wilson et al., 1996a
). The
prenylation of Rab proteins is catalyzed by geranylgeranyltransferase
type II (GGTaseII), which can modify Rab proteins ending with a variety
of carboxyl-terminal cysteine motifs (e.g., XCXC,
XXCC, CCXX, where C = cysteine and
X = any amino acid) (Farnsworth et al.,
1994
). GGTaseII was originally identified as "component B" of the
Rab geranylgeranyltransferase complex (Seabra et al.,
1992b
). The enzyme is a heterodimer, consisting of
and
subunits
(Armstrong et al., 1993
). In this respect GGTaseII resembles
farnesyltransferase (FTase) and geranylgeranyltransferase type I
(GGTaseI), which modify different members of the Ras superfamily that
end with CAAX sequence motifs (C = cysteine,
A = aliphatic residue, X = any amino
acid), e.g., Ras, Rac, Rap, and Rho (Casey and Seabra, 1996
). However,
early studies revealed several unique features of the Rab prenylation
mechanism. Specifically, although the presence of a carboxyl-terminal
CAAX sequence element is sufficient for prenylation of most
Ras-related substrates by FTase and GGTaseI (Casey et al.,
1991
; Goldstein et al., 1991
; Reiss et al., 1991
; Yokoyama et al., 1991
; Yokoyama and Gelb, 1993
; Zhang
et al., 1994
), the modification of Rab proteins by GGTaseII
is sensitive to alterations in structural domains remote from the
carboxyl-terminal prenylation site (Moores et al., 1991
;
Kinsella and Maltese, 1992
; Khosravi-Far et al., 1992
;
Wilson and Maltese, 1993
; Sanford et al., 1993
; Beranger
et al., 1994
). Most notably, prenylation of Rab substrates
requires that they reside in a particular guanine nucleotide state,
i.e., the GDP conformation is preferred (Sanford et al.,
1993
; Schiedel et al., 1995
; Wilson et al.,
1996b
). An explanation for the unique structural requirements for Rab
prenylation has come with the discovery that, unlike FTase and GGTaseI,
the catalytic 
dimer of GGTaseII is unable to modify monomeric
GTPase substrates. Instead, the Rab protein must first bind to a
carrier protein termed Rab escort protein (REP, originally called
"component A") to form a viable substrate complex (Seabra et
al., 1992a
; Andres et al., 1993
). Indeed, a recent
study has established that the nucleotide sensitivity of the Rab
prenylation reaction is directly related to the preferential
interaction of REP with Rab proteins in the GDP state (Seabra, 1996
).
Upon completion of the prenylation reaction, REP remains stably
associated with geranylgeranylated Rab proteins in vitro, suggesting
that REP may serve as a molecular chaperone which delivers newly
modified Rab proteins to their appropriate membrane target sites in
vivo (Alexandrov et al., 1994
; Shen and Seabra, 1996
).
Consistent with this role, the two known mammalian REPs contain several
domains that are similar to regions of Rab GDI (Schalk et
al., 1996
).
The specific structural elements involved in the interaction of nascent
Rab proteins with REP have not been fully defined, although previous
studies have shown that the efficiency of Rab prenylation in cell-free
assays is substantially reduced by alterations in three distinct
regions: 1) the extreme amino-terminal domain (Wilson and Maltese,
1993
; Sanford et al., 1995
); 2) the region analogous to the
Ras effector-domain (loop-2/
2) (Wilson and Maltese, 1993
); and 3)
the region corresponding to loop-3/
3 in the Ras structure (Beranger
et al., 1994
). The basis for the reduced prenylation of
these altered proteins is not known, although a recent study utilizing
the yeast two-hybrid assay has suggested that the amino-terminal and
effector regions of Rab3A may interact with the
-subunit of GGTaseII
(Johannes et al., 1996
). The preferential binding of REP to
Rab proteins in the GDP state suggests that this association involves
Rab structural elements that undergo major conformational changes when
the nucleotide binding site is occupied by GDP versus GTP. In H-Ras two
specific domains termed Switch 1 (amino acids 32-40) and Switch
2(amino acids 60-76) fit this description (Krengel et al.,
1990
; Pai et al., 1990
; Tong et al., 1991
). Both
regions play important roles in the interaction of Ras with downstream effectors (Polakis and McCormick, 1993
; Moodie et al.,
1995
). However, the
2 helix of the Switch 2 region appears to be
particularly important for the association of Ras-GDP with guanine
nucleotide exchange factors (Crechet et al., 1996
; Quilliam
et al., 1996
). These observations prompted us to examine the
role of the putative Switch 2 domain of Rab1B in REP-dependent
posttranslational modification by GGTaseII. The results described in
this report indicate that the region of Rab1B analogous to the
2
helix of Ras is a key structural determinant for interaction with REP.
| |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Mutagenesis of Rab1B
The cDNAs encoding Myc-Rab1B(wt), Myc-Rab1B(
CC), which lacks
the C-terminal cysteines, and Myc-Rab1B(Q67L) were generated as
described previously (Wilson et al., 1996b
). As noted
earlier (Wilson and Maltese, 1993
), the Rab1B(wt) cDNA sequence used in our studies differs from that originally reported by Vielh et al. (1989)
insofar as it encodes isoleucine rather than valine at
position 73. New point mutations were introduced into the Rab1B cDNA by
means of the polymerase chain reaction utilizing Taq DNA polymerase
(Perkin Elmer-Cetus, Norwalk, CT) (I73N, Y78D, A81D, and A110D) or Deep
Vent polymerase (New England Biolabs, Beverly, MA) (L103R, K137E, and
G144N). All constructs were subsequently modified to encode a 5
Myc-epitope tag sequence and subcloned into pCMV5neo (Krupinski
et al., 1992
) for mammalian expression studies or pET17b
(Novagen, Madison, WI) for expression in Escherichia coli.
The sequences of all constructs were verified by the dideoxy chain
termination technique using Sequenase 2.0 (United States Biochemical
Corp., Cleveland, OH).
Geranylgeranylation of Recombinant Myc-Rab1B
Rab proteins were expressed in E. coli as previously
described and the relative amounts of Myc-Rab1B(wt), Myc-Rab1B(I73N), Myc-Rab1B(Y78D), Myc-Rab1B(A81D), Myc-Rab1B(L103R), Myc-Rab1B(A110D), Myc-Rab1B(K137E), Myc-Rab1B(G144N), and Myc-Rab1B(
CC) in each lysate
were determined by immunoblot analysis using a primary antibody against the Myc epitope (EQKLISEEDL) and
125I-labeled goat anti-mouse IgG secondary antibody (Wilson
et al., 1996a
). Bound 125I-labeled IgG was
quantified by phosphorimager analysis. For cell-free prenylation of the
recombinant proteins, aliquots of E. coli lysate containing
comparable amounts (20-30 pmol) of each Myc-Rab1B protein were added
to 50-µl reaction mixtures containing 50 mM HEPES (pH 7.4), 5 mM
MgCl2, 1 mM dithiothreitol, 10 µM GDP, 0.2 mM Nonidet P-40, and 10 µl of a rat brain ammonium sulfate fraction enriched in
Rab geranylgeranyl transferase activity (Seabra et al.,
1992b
). Prenylation reactions were initiated by the addition of 1 µCi of [3H]geranylgeranyl pyrophosphate (15 Ci/mmol, American
Radiochemical Corp., St. Louis, MO) and terminated after 1 h at
37°C by addition of SDS-sample buffer (Laemmli, 1970
). Each reaction
mixture was divided into two equal portions that were subjected to
SDS-PAGE on separate gels. The first gel was dried and incorporation of [3H]geranylgeranyl (GG moiety) into Myc-Rab1B was
determined by fluorography (Kinsella and Maltese, 1992
). Proteins in
the second gel were transferred to polyvinylidene difluoride (PVDF)
membrane and the relative amount of Myc-Rab1B was determined by
immunoblot analysis as described earlier. Results were
quantified by densitometric analysis with a Molecular Dynamics personal
densitometer and ImageQuant software.
Prenylation of Myc-Rab1B Constructs in Cultured Cells
HEK-293 cells were obtained from the American Type Culture
Collection (Bethesda, MD) and grown in DMEM supplemented with 10% (vol/vol) heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum (FBS). Cells were plated
in 100-mm dishes at a density of 3.2 × 103
cells/cm2 on the day before transfection. A calcium
phosphate precipitation technique (Gorman et al., 1990
) was
used to transfect parallel cultures with 40 µg of each of the
following vectors: pCMVrab1B(wt), pCMVrab1B(Q67L), pCMVrab1B(I73N),
pCMVrab1B(Y78D), pCMVrab1B(A81D), pCMVrab1B(A110D), pCMVrab1B(L103R),
pCMVrab1B(K137L), pCMVrab1B(G144N), or
pCMVrab1B(
CC). The transfected cells were incubated for
18 h in medium containing 200 µCi/ml [3H]mevalonic
acid lactone (MVA; approximately 3.4 Ci/mmol) and 10 µM lovastatin
(provided by A. Alberts, Merck Sharp and Dohme Research Laboratories,
Rahway, NJ). Detailed procedures for cell lysis and measurement of the
incorporation of [3H]MVA into immunoprecipitated
Myc-tagged Rab proteins have been described previously (Wilson et
al., 1996b
).
Assessment of the Guanine Nucleotide State of Myc-Rab1B Expressed in Cultured Cells
The guanine nucleotide content of various Myc-Rab1B
constructs expressed in 293 cells was determined by a modification of the procedure described by Brondyk et al. (1993)
. On the day
before transfection, cells were plated in 60-mm dishes at a density of 1.8 × 104 cells/cm2. Separate cultures
were transfected with 10 µg pCMVrab1B(wt), pCMVrab1B(I73N), pCMVrab1B(Y78D),
pCMVrab1B(A81D), pCMVrab1B(A110D), or
pCMVrab1B(Q67L). During the transfection, the cells were
maintained in DMEM with 2% (vol/vol) heat-inactivated FBS and 10 µM
lovastatin. Three hours after addition of the DNA, the cells were
shocked with 15% (vol/vol) glycerol in PBS for 30 s and then fed
with fresh DMEM containing 10% FBS and 10 µM lovastatin. One day
after transfection, each culture was incubated for 5 h with 100 µCi/ml [32P]orthophosphate (9000 Ci/mmol, New England
Nuclear) in phosphate-free DMEM (Life Technologies, Gaithersburg, MD)
supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated FBS and 10 µM lovastatin. The
cells were washed three times with Hanks' balanced salt solution and
disrupted in 200 µl ice-cold lysis buffer consisting of 20 mM HEPES
(pH 7.3), 20 mM MgCl2, 150 mM NaCl, 0.75% vol/vol Nonidet
P-40, complete mini-EDTA-free protease inhibitors (Boehringer Mannheim,
Indianapolis, IN). All subsequent steps were carried out at 4°C.
Particulate material was removed by centrifugation at 10,000 × g for 2 min and the epitope-tagged Rab1B proteins were
immunoprecipitated with Myc monoclonal antibody for 1 h. To reduce
the free guanine nucleotides, 100 µl of 10% (wt/vol) activated
charcoal in phosphate-buffered saline were added to each sample (Gibbs
et al., 1990
). The charcoal had been previously incubated
with 10 mg/ml bovine serum albumin and washed three times with
phosphate-buffered saline. After a 30-min incubation, the charcoal was
removed by centrifugation at 10,000 × g for 2 min, and
immune complexes were collected by incubation for 1 h with protein
A-Sepharose beads coupled to goat anti-mouse IgG. The beads were washed
five times with lysis buffer and 32P-labeled guanine
nucleotides were eluted by incubation for 20 min at 68°C in 20 µl
of elution buffer (20 mM HEPES, pH 7.3, 25 mM EDTA, 2.0% wt/vol SDS,
0.5 mM GDP, 0.5 mM GTP). A 5-µl aliquot of each eluate was subjected
to TLC on polyethyleneimine cellulose plates (Sigma, St. Louis, MO)
developed in 0.75 M KH2PO4 (pH 3.4). Radioactivity in the GTP and GDP spots was quantified with a Molecular Dynamics phosphorimaging system. In calculating GDP:GTP ratios, the
phosphorimager units of GDP were multiplied by 1.5 to correct for moles
of phosphate/mole guanosine in GDP versus GTP. Since the intrinsic
GTPase activities of the various Myc-Rab1B constructs at 4°C were
unknown, no attempt was made to correct for GTP hydrolysis that might
have occurred during the immunoprecipitation procedure. The relative
amount of Myc-Rab1B in each sample was estimated by subjecting 10 µl
of the eluate to SDS-PAGE and immunoblot analysis using the
anti-Myc antibody and the ECL (Amersham, Arlington Heights, IL)
detection system.
Association of T7-REP1 and Myc-Rab1B in Cultured Cells
The cDNA encoding rat REP-1 (Andres et al., 1993
) was
provided by Joseph Goldstein and Miguel Seabra (University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX). A
HindIII-BamHI fragment containing the REP-1
coding sequence was excised from pBlueScript and inserted into a
modified version of pCMV5 (Andersson et al., 1989
) that had
been engineered to encode an in-frame T7 epitope tag (amino acid
sequence, MASMTGGQQMG) upstream of the HindIII site. The
resulting construct is termed pCMVREP1.
HEK-293 cells were plated in 100-mm dishes at 2.8 × 103 cells/cm2 the day before transfection. Cells were cotransfected with 15 µg of pCMVREP1 combined with 20 µg of pCMVrab1B(wt), pCMVrab1B(I73N), pCMVrab1B(Y78D), pCMVrab1B(A81D), pCMVrab1B(A110D), or pCMVrab1B(Q67L) and cultures were maintained in medium containing 10 µM lovastatin throughout the posttransfection period. Two days after transfection, cells were washed three times with Hanks' balanced salt solution, harvested, then homogenized in buffer A (50 mM HEPES, pH 7.4, 5 mM MgCl2, 1 mM dithiothreitol, and complete mini-EDTA-free protease inhibitor cocktail). Nuclei and unbroken cells were removed by centrifugation at 400 × g for 10 min. The supernatant solution was centrifuged at 100,000 × g for 30 min, and the resulting cytosolic fraction was applied to an FPLC Superose-12 gel filtration column (Pharmacia, Pistcataway, NJ) that had been equilibrated in buffer A at a flow rate of 0.5 ml/min and calibrated with appropriate standard proteins (Sigma). The column was eluted with the same buffer and 0.2-ml fractions were collected on ice. Aliquots (100 µl) were removed from each fraction and the proteins were resolved by SDS-PAGE and transferred to a PVDF membrane. The upper half of the blot was incubated with a monoclonal antibody against the T7 epitope (Novagen) to detect the presence of T7-REP in the column fractions, whereas the lower half of the blot was incubated with the monoclonal antibody against the Myc epitope to detect Myc-Rab1B. 125I-labeled goat anti-mouse IgG was applied as the secondary antibody and bound IgG was quantified with a Molecular Dynamics phosphorimager.
Triton X-114 Partitioning of Rab Proteins
Column fractions containing immunodetectable Myc-Rab1B protein that coeluted with T7-REP at approximately 150 kDa were combined to form pool-1, whereas fractions containing Myc-Rab1B that eluted as a monomer at the position of the 29-kDa marker were combined to form pool-2. Triton X-114 was added to each pool to a final concentration of 1% (vol/vol). The samples were kept on ice for 10 min and then warmed to 37°C for 2 min. The aqueous and detergent phases were separated by centrifugation in a microfuge at top speed for 2 min. Proteins from each phase were collected by precipitation with trichloroacetic acid, solubilized in SDS sample buffer, resolved by SDS-PAGE, and transferred to a PVDF membrane. The relative amounts of Myc-Rab1B in the aqueous and detergent fractions was then determined by immunoblot analysis using the anti-Myc antibody and 125I-labeled IgG for detection.
| |
RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Effects of Mutations in the Switch 2 Region of Rab1B on Geranylgeranylation of the Recombinant Protein
The three-dimensional (3-D) structure of H-Ras has been determined
and the domains that undergo guanine nucleotide-dependent conformational changes have been mapped (Krengel et al.
1990
; Pai et al. 1990
; Tong et al. 1991
; Polakis
and McCormick, 1993
). Most of the general structural features in Ras
are conserved in other low molecular weight GTP-binding proteins
(Bourne et al. 1991
; Valencia et al. 1991
).
Therefore, the Ras structure has been widely used as a prototype to aid
in the selection of sites for mutagenesis in structure-function studies
of Rab proteins (Burstein et al., 1992
; Tisdale et
al., 1992
; Li and Stahl, 1993
; Stenmark et al., 1994
).
To assess the role of the Switch 2 domain of Rab1B in the interaction
with REP/GGTaseII, we created three different amino acid substitutions
in the region predicted to correspond to the
2 helix of Ras: I73N,
Y78D, and A81D. For purposes of comparison, mutations were also
introduced into regions corresponding to the
3 helix (L103R, A110D)
and the
4 helix (K137E, G144N). In Figure
1 these Rab1B amino acid substitutions
are superimposed on the Swiss 3-D image of H-Ras (GDP-bound form) to
illustrate their approximate locations. To facilitate
immunoprecipitation analyses of Rab1B proteins expressed in intact
cells, all of the rab1B cDNA constructs were engineered to
encode a Myc epitope tag at the amino terminus of the protein. The
addition of such tag sequences to Ras-related proteins, including
several members of the Rab family, does not alter their subcellular
localization (Adamson et al., 1992
; Brondyk et
al., 1993
; Chen et al., 1993
; Beranger et
al., 1994
). Moreover, consistent with previous studies of Rab6
(Schiedel et al., 1995
), we have observed that the presence of the Myc tag does not interfere with the geranylgeranylation of
recombinant Rab1B (Figure 2B).
|
|
The Rab1B mutants described above were initially screened for their
ability to undergo geranylgeranylation in cell-free assays. When
equivalent amounts of recombinant Myc-tagged protein were compared in
parallel assays, there was no detectable incorporation of
[3H]GG into the three
2 helix mutants, whereas
geranylgeranylation of the
3 and
4 helix mutants was similar to
wild-type Myc-Rab1B (Figure 2A and Table
1).
|
Effects of Mutations in the Switch 2 Region on Prenylation of Rab1B in HEK-293 Cells
The results of cell-free geranylgeranyltransferase assays may not
always accurately reflect the ability of Rab proteins to undergo
prenylation in mammalian cells (Wilson et al., 1996ab), where the conformation and/or guanine nucleotide state of the nascent
polypeptide may be influenced by undefined molecular chaperones, nucleotide exchange factors, or GTPase-activating proteins.
Therefore, the Rab1B
2 helix mutants were further evaluated as
GGTaseII substrates by transiently overexpressing them in HEK-293 cells and measuring the incorporation of the isoprenoid precursor,
[3H]MVA, into the immunoprecipitated Myc-tagged proteins.
As shown in Figure 3 and Table 1,
prenylation of the I73N and A81D mutants was markedly reduced compared
with Myc-Rab1B(wt), and there was no detectable incorporation of
[3H]MVA into Myc-Rab1B(Y78D). In contrast, incorporation
of [3H]MVA into Myc-Rab1B proteins with nonconservative
substitutions in the
3 helix (A110D, L103R) or the
4 helix
(K137E, G144N) was readily detected by this metabolic labeling assay.
In the cases of the A110D and L103R mutants, there was a noticeable
reduction in the amount of Myc-Rab1B recovered in the
immunoprecipitates due to weaker expression of these proteins in the
transfected cells. However, the [3H]MVA incorporation per
unit of immunodetectable protein was actually increased in comparison
to wild-type Rab1B (see Table 1). The basis for this increase is
presently unclear. In agreement with our previous observations (Wilson
et al., 1996b
), we also found that Myc-Rab1B(Q67L), which
bears an amino acid substitution in loop 4 near the
2 helix (see
Figure 1) was efficiently prenylated in 293 cells, despite the fact
that the mutation reduces the intrinsic GTPase activity of the protein.
|
Rab1B Switch 2 Mutants Expressed in 293 Cells Bind and Hydrolyze GTP
Previous studies have established that mutations that reduce
the affinity of Rab proteins for guanine nucleotides render these proteins poor substrates for GGTaseII (Sanford et al.,
1993
), presumably because they cannot assume the GDP state required for optimal interaction with REP (Seabra, 1996
). To determine whether the
mutations introduced into the Switch 2 region of Rab1B might cause
general protein misfolding with consequent loss of nucleotide binding,
293 cells expressing wild-type or mutant Myc-Rab1B constructs were
metabolically labeled with [32P]orthophosphate, and
guanine nucleotides were eluted from the expressed proteins after they
were immunoprecipitated with an antibody against the Myc epitope. To
ensure that the observations would be representative of the
nonprenylated Myc-Rab1B substrate pool, the transfected cells were
treated with 10 µM lovastatin to block isoprenoid biosynthesis and
prevent protein prenylation before and during the labeling period. This
approach is limited in two respects: 1) The stoichiometry of nucleotide
binding is difficult to calculate because the specific radioactivities
of the guanine nucleotide pools are not known and the chemiluminescent immunoblot signals cannot be readily translated into moles
of Myc-Rab1B protein. 2) The proportion of Myc-Rab1B in the GDP state in the intact cells may be overestimated, since no correction was made
for GTP hydrolysis that might have occurred during the immunoprecipitation procedure. Nevertheless, as shown in Figure 4, general comparisons of the
32P-labeled nucleotides recovered on the TLC plates with
the corresponding ECL signals for the immunoprecipitated proteins
indicated that overall nucleotide binding was not markedly deficient in
any of the Myc-Rab1B mutants compared with Myc-Rab1B(wt). There were some clear variations in the GDP:GTP ratios among the proteins (Table
1), suggesting possible differences in GTP hydrolysis. For example,
although the Y78D and A81D mutants contained a five to ninefold excess
of GDP over GTP, their GDP:GTP ratios were somewhat lower than that
determined for Myc-Rab1B(wt). In the case of the I73N mutant this
tendency was more pronounced, with the GDP:GTP ratio approaching the
value determined for the Q67L mutant. However, it should be noted that
even in the I73N and Q67L mutants 45-50% of the total radiolabeled
nucleotide was GDP, implying that both proteins retained a significant
capacity for GTP hydrolysis.
|
Effects of Switch 2 Mutations on the Interaction Between Epitope-tagged Rab1B and REP in 293 Cells
We next wished to determine whether the deficient
prenylation of the Rab1B
2 helix mutants in cultured cells (Figure
3) was due to a decreased ability of these proteins to associate with REP. Several studies have shown that in mammalian cells Rab proteins reside predominantly in membranes or in cytosolic complexes with GDI
(Regazzi et al., 1992
; Soldati et al., 1993
;
Peter et al. 1994
; Yang et al., 1994
). Complexes
between nascent Rabs and REP are not readily detected, presumably
because these are formed only transiently during the prenylation
reaction and normally exist at very low concentrations. However,
Alexandrov et al. (1994)
have shown that when the
prenylation machinery is saturated by Rab overexpression, nonprenylated
Rab substrates accumulate to the extent that it becomes possible to
capture the nascent Rab-REP complex. Thus, we decided to pursue a
strategy wherein each of the Myc-Rab1B constructs would be transiently
coexpressed in 293 cells along with T7 epitope-tagged REP-1. Since we
were particularly interested in assessing the ability of the
nonprenylated Myc-Rab1B proteins to form an initial complex
with REP (i.e., the requisite substrate for modification by GGTaseII),
all 293 cell cultures were maintained in medium containing 10 µM
lovastatin to block isoprenoid synthesis during and after the
transfection procedure. We first attempted to isolate T7-REP/Myc-Rab1B
complexes by coimmunoprecipitation with antibodies against the epitope
tags. However, in our hands this approach proved to be impractical
because the detergent concentrations required to obtain clean
immunoprecipitates were in a range expected to dissociate the initial
REP-Rab complex. As an alternative, we prepared detergent-free
cytosolic fractions from the transfected cells and subjected these
preparations to gel filtration chromatography using antibodies against
the T7 and Myc epitopes to monitor the elution of the expressed T7-REP
and Myc-Rab1B proteins.
As illustrated in Figure 5A, when
Myc-Rab1B(wt) was coexpressed with T7-REP, the epitope-tagged REP was
eluted as a broad peak at approximately 150,000 kDa, consistent with
the previously reported properties of recombinant REP and REP-Rab
complexes (Seabra, 1996
; Shen and Seabra, 1996
). Most of the expressed
Myc-Rab1B(wt) was eluted at the position of the 29-kDa marker, as
expected for a nonprenylated Rab monomer. However, a small percentage
(2-5%) of the total Myc-Rab1B was consistently found in the high
molecular weight fractions containing the early portions of the T7-REP
peak. Two lines of evidence indicated that this represented a specific complex between Myc-Rab1B and T7-REP. First, overexpression of Myc-Rab1B alone (Figure 5B) did not give rise to a detectable Myc
signal in the high molecular weight fractions. Second, when the same
experiment was performed with Myc-Ras instead of Myc-Rab1B (Figure 5C),
no Myc-tagged protein was detected in the fractions containing T7-REP,
in agreement with the reported inability of Ras to associate with REP
(Andres et al., 1993
).
|
In the foregoing studies we hypothesized that any Myc-Rab1B associated
with T7-REP in the lovastatin-treated cells would be in the
nonprenylated form. To test this hypothesis directly, the pools of
Myc-Rab1B that cofractionated either with T7-REP or with the 29-kDa
marker were subjected to a standard Triton X-114 phase partitioning
assay, with the expectation that any geranylgeranylated Rabs would be
extracted into the detergent phase (Beranger et al., 1994
).
The results clearly demonstrate that the Myc-Rab1B collected in both
the monomeric pool and the T7-REP-associated pool behaved as
nonprenylated protein, remaining almost entirely in the aqueous phase
(Figure 6).
|
Figure 7 (C-E) shows the results
obtained when the coexpression assay was used to evaluate the potential
interactions between T7-REP and the three Myc-Rab1B Switch 2 mutants
(A81D, I73N, and Y78D) that were previously found to be poorly labeled
by [3H]MVA in 293 cells. In each case, we failed to
detect any Myc-Rab1B in the fractions containing T7-REP eluted from the
gel filtration column. By comparison, a peak of Myc-Rab1B that
comigrated with T7-REP was readily detected in cells expressing the
Q67L mutant (Figure 7B), in agreement with the demonstrated ability of
this protein to undergo prenylation (Figure 3). Although there was inevitably some variability in the levels of total T7-REP and Myc-Rab1B
expression in these studies, the ratios of T7-REP:Myc-Rab1B were
generally similar in each experiment. Moreover, in the case of the
wild-type protein, we were able to detect a pool of Myc-Rab1B that
cofractionated with T7-REP over a wide range of Myc-Rab1B expression
levels (e.g., compare Figures 5A and 7A). Thus, differences in protein
expression levels could not account for the complete absence of
T7-REP-associated Myc-Rab1B in the cases of the I73N, A81D, and Y78D
mutants. In light of the data in Figure 4 which suggest that these
mutants are capable of assuming the GDP-bound conformation required for
interaction with REP, these observations indicate that the introduction
of nonconservative amino acid substitutions into the
2 helix of
Rab1B impedes the physical interaction of REP with the Switch 2 domain
of the GDP-bound Rab protein.
|
| |
DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Based on the Ras model, the conformation of the Switch 2 region of
Rab1B is predicted to be substantially different when the protein is in
the GDP state versus the GTP state (Krengel et al., 1990
;
Pai et al., 1990
; Tong et al., 1991
). The present
studies define the putative
2 helix of the Switch 2 region in Rab1B
as a major structural determinant for association with REP in intact cells. Consistent with this finding, the sequences of the amino acids
that form the loop2/
2 region are highly conserved among members of
the Rab subgroup compared with other proteins in the Ras superfamily
(Valencia et al., 1991
).
The data indicate that the striking impairment of geranylgeranylation
of Rab1B caused by the I73N, Y78D, and A81D
2 helix substitutions is
due primarily to disruption of the intermolecular interaction between
Rab1B and REP rather than indirect effects of these mutations on the
nucleotide state of the GTPase. None of the
2 helix mutants showed a
substantial decrease in the ability to bind guanine nucleotides in
intact cells (Figure 4). Moreover, while two of these mutants (I73N,
Y78D) appeared to have reduced GTPase activity relative to Rab1B(wt),
it is unlikely that this accounts for the defective interaction with
REP. This conclusion is based on comparisons of the guanine nucleotide
analyses to the prenylation data and REP interaction studies
(summarized in Table 1). For example, although there were marked
variations in the 32P GDP:GTP ratios among the
2 helix
mutants (ranging from a near-wild type value of 9.5 for A81D to a low
of 1.0 for I73N), the steady-state prenylation of these proteins,
determined by mevalonate labeling, was uniformly reduced by 90-100%.
This point is further emphasized when the results obtained for the
2
helix mutants are compared with results for the GTPase-deficient Q67L
mutant (Table 1). Specifically, although the latter protein had the
lowest 32P GDP:GTP ratio determined for any of the mutant
Rab1B constructs analyzed, the prenylation of Rab1B(Q67L) was
indistinguishable from Rab1B(wt) (Figure 3; Wilson et al.,
1996b
). On the surface, this finding might seem to conflict with
previous studies showing that the GDP-bound form of the Rab protein is
the preferred substrate for prenylation (Sanford et al.,
1993
; Schiedel et al., 1995
; Wilson et al.,
1996b
) and REP interaction (Seabra, 1996
). However, it is important to
note that when Rab proteins are overexpressed in cultured cells, a
significant amount of nonprenylated protein accumulates in the cytosol,
indicating that the Rab geranylgeranyltransferase machinery may be
overloaded under such conditions (Alexandrov et al., 1994
;
Wilson et al., 1996a
). Thus, although the relative amount of
expressed Myc-Rab1B(Q67L) residing in the GDP state appears to be
relatively small when compared with the other Rab1B constructs, the
amount of available GDP-bound Q67L substrate (approximately 50% of the
total expressed protein) is probably sufficient to saturate REP and
drive the GGTaseII reaction when the protein is overexpressed in 293 cells. The same argument would apply to the A110D mutant which, despite
a lower-than-normal 32P GDP:GTP ratio, is prenylated
efficiently in 293 cells. In light of these observations, it is
difficult to envision a mechanism whereby the poor prenylation of the
Y78D and A81D Switch 2 mutants (both of which had substantially higher
32P GDP:GTP ratios than Q67L or A110D) could be explained
on the basis of an inability to attain the GDP state.
Although the present study highlights the Switch 2 domain of Rab1B as
being critical for association with REP, it is probable that additional
structural elements of the Rab protein also contribute to this
interaction. The other major domain predicted to undergo a significant
nucleotide-dependent conformational change in the Rab proteins is the
Switch 1 region, which includes the effector domain (loop 2 and the
proximal portion of
2 in the Ras model). We previously showed that
amino acid substitutions (D44N, I41N) in the effector domain severely
reduced the ability of Rab1B to undergo prenylation in reticulocyte
lysates (Wilson and Maltese, 1993
). When the D44N mutant was
overexpressed in 293 cells, its prenylation was reduced by
approximately 50% compared with Rab1B(wt) (Wilson et al.,
1996a
). Although this finding was not as dramatic as the near
elimination of prenylation observed with the Switch 2 mutants, it
suggests that the affinity of Rab1B for REP may have been weakened, but
not entirely lost, by perturbation of the Switch 1 effector domain.
Thus, it is entirely possible that both the Switch 1 and Switch 2 regions cooperate to form a complex 3-D structure that is recognized by
REP. Additional evidence to support this concept comes from an early
study of chimeric proteins by Khosravi-Far et al. (1992)
in
which a 139-residue carboxyl-terminal segment of Rab1B (containing the
Switch 2 region, but not the intact Rab effector domain) failed to
undergo prenylation when grafted to the amino-terminal portion of Ras.
Finally, in addition to the nucleotide-sensitive Switch 1 and Switch 2 regions, we and others have shown that structural alterations in the
amino-terminal (Wilson and Maltese, 1993
; Sanford et al.,
1995
) and carboxyl-terminal (Kinsella and Maltese, 1991
; Cremers
et al., 1994
) variable regions of Rab proteins can have a
profound influence on prenylation efficiency. However, it remains to be
determined whether these effects are directly related to decreased
affinity for REP or changes in the interaction of the REP-Rab complex
with the catalytic 
subunits of GGTaseII.
Although most members of the Rab family can be geranylgeranylated with
similar efficiency in the presence of either REP-1 or REP-2 (Cremers
et al., 1994
), an interesting exception was reported by
Seabra et al. (1995)
, who noted that Rab27 has a
significantly reduced affinity for REP-2 compared with REP-1. The gene
encoding REP-1 is known to be defective in the retinal degenerative
disease choroideremia (Cremers et al., 1990
), and Rab27 is
localized in the specific cell layers that are affected in this disease
(Seabra et al., 1995
). Taken together, these findings have
suggested that the reduced ability of REP-2 to support prenylation of
Rab27 in the absence of REP-1, and a consequent disruption of undefined Rab27-mediated transport events, could underlie the pathophysiology of
choroideremia. We have performed CLUSTALW sequence alignments between
Rab1B and Rab27 to determine whether there might be any significant
differences in the domains comprising the Switch 2 region (i.e.,
residues 64-83 in Rab1B, which align with the Ras loop 4/
2 helix).
The results indicated a high degree of similarity (55% identity)
between the Switch 2 domains of Rab1B and Rab27. However, Rab27
contains two separate 5-amino acid inserts that occur outside the
Switch 2 domain at positions 46 and 56 in Rab1B. These inserts are
predicted to occur in regions corresponding to
2 and
3 in Ras
(see Figure 1) and are absent in other Rab proteins (Valencia et
al., 1991
). Since the
2 and
3 regions anchor the Switch 1 and Switch 2 domains, it is conceivable that the presence of the unique
sequence elements in Rab27 might alter the manner in which the two key
guanine nucleotide-sensitive Switch domains are juxtaposed, thus
accounting for the novel selectivity of Rab27 with respect to the two
forms of REP.
As mentioned in the INTRODUCTION, the Rab GDIs (e.g., GDI
and
GDI
) are functionally similar to REP insofar as they form cytosolic
complexes specifically with the GDP-bound form of the Rab protein and
are able to deliver prenylated Rabs to intracellular membranes (Araki
et al., 1990
; Dirac-Svejestrup et al., 1994
; Peter et al., 1994
; Ullrich, et al., 1994
).
Moreover, several structural features appear to be highly conserved
between GDI and REP (Schalk et al., 1996
). In particular,
mutagenesis studies have implicated two GDI/REP "sequence-conserved
regions" in the domain I portion of GDI as being important for Rab
binding (Schalk et al., 1996
). We have previously shown that
introduction of the D44N substitution into the Switch 1 effector domain
essentially eliminates the ability of Rab1B to bind to GDI in vitro and
in intact cells (Wilson et al., 1996a
). Given the importance
of the Switch 2 region for REP binding demonstrated in the present
study, it is reasonable to speculate that the Switch 2 region may also play an important role in the interaction between GDP-bound Rab proteins and the domain I structure of GDI. Direct experimental verification of this idea is complicated by the fact that Rab proteins
must be geranylgeranylated for optimal interaction with GDI (Musha
et al., 1992
; Soldati et al., 1993
; Wilson
et al., 1996a
) and the Switch 2 mutants cannot be
efficiently modified by REP/GGTaseII. However, previous studies have
suggested that it may be possible to circumvent the REP requirement for
prenylation by engineering the Rab carboxyl-terminal cysteine motif to
conform to the typical CAAX box found on other Ras-related
proteins that are modified in a REP-independent manner by FTase or
GGTaseI (Khosravi-Far et al., 1992
). Application of this
approach to the Rab1B Switch 2 mutants may therefore permit a direct
assessment of their ability to associate with GDI. Moreover, if
adequate REP-independent prenylation of the Switch 2 mutants can be
obtained in intact cells, it may be possible to use these and similar
REP-binding-deficient Rab constructs to examine the roles of REP and
the Rab Switch 2 domain in the targeting of nascent Rab proteins to
their specific intracellular destinations.
| |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT |
|---|
This work was supported by National Institutes of Health grant CA34569 to W.A.M.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* Corresponding author: Weis Center for Research, Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine, 100 N. Academy Avenue, Danville, PA 17822-2616. E-mail: wam{at}psghs.edu.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|