![]() |
|
|
Vol. 9, Issue 11, 3195-3209, November 1998


Departments of
*Molecular Cell Biology and
Biological Regulation, The Weizmann Institute of
Science, Rehovot 76100, Israel; and
Department of Human Microbiology,
Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv 69978, Israel
| |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Neuregulin, or neu differentiation factor, induces cell
proliferation or differentiation through interaction with members of
the ErbB family of receptor tyrosine kinases. We report that neuregulin
can also induce profound morphogenic responses in cultured epithelial
cells of different origins. These effects include scattering of small
epithelial islands and rearrangement of larger cell islands into
ordered ring-shaped arrays with internal lumens. The ring-forming cells
are interconnected by cadherin- and
-catenin-containing adherens
junctions. In confluent cultures, neuregulin treatment induces
formation of circular lumenlike gaps in the monolayer. Both cell
scattering and ring formation are accompanied by a marked increase in
cell motility that is independent of hepatocyte growth factor/scatter
factor and its receptor (c-Met). Affinity-labeling experiments
implied that a combination of ErbB-2 with ErbB-3 mediates the
morphogenic signal of neuregulin in gastric cells. Indeed, a similar
morphogenic effect could be reconstituted in nonresponsive cells by
coexpression of ErbB-2 and -3. We conclude that a heterodimer between
the kinase-defective neuregulin receptor, ErbB-3, and the coreceptor,
ErbB-2, mediates the morphogenetic action of neuregulin.
| |
INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
A variety of developmental processes, including embryonic
development and tissue morphogenesis, depend on structural
reorganization of individual cells and cell groups. Alterations in cell
morphology, in turn, are driven by coordinated changes in cell
motility, adhesion, and cytoskeletal organization (Trinkaus, 1984
;
Bray, 1992
). Morphogenetic processes are of a particular importance in
epithelial cells, which form coherent layers that expand,
contract, and often fold into tubular or alveolar structures (Bray,
1992
). Epithelial tissue can also disintegrate into separate motile
cells in a process known as epithelial-mesenchymal transition
(Savagner et al., 1994
; Birchmeier and Birchmeier, 1995
;
Hay, 1995
). All these processes are controlled by specific
morphogenetic genes and depend both on specific developmental programs
and external signals triggered by the extracellular matrix (ECM) and
soluble ligands (growth factors). With the aid of these ligands, the
behavior of epithelial cells can be controlled by the surrounding mesenchyme.
A well-studied system in which epithelial cells display
ligand-dependent morphogenic behavior is based on hepatocyte growth factor/scatter factor (HGF/SF) and its receptor c-Met (Stoker et al., 1987
; Gherardi et al., 1993
). The
scattering effect of HGF/SF depends on the activation of c-Met tyrosine
kinase (Bottaro et al., 1991
; Naldini et al.,
1991
), which in turn phosphorylates a number of downstream targets
(Sachs et al., 1996
; Weidner et al.,
1996
; Tamagnone and Comoglio, 1997
). Besides cell scattering, under
special culture conditions, HGF/SF treatment induces formation of
branching, multicellular tubular structures (Montesano et
al., 1991
; Soriano et al., 1995
; Yang et
al., 1995
), suggesting that HGF/SF and c-Met may induce the
formation of glandular structures in vivo (Tsarfaty et al.,
1992
; Tsarfaty et al., 1994
). However, it was recently shown
that epidermal growth factor (EGF) can replace HGF/SF in kidney tubule
formation in met knockout mice (Kjelsberg et al.,
1997
).
The HGF/SF and c-Met signaling is not the only inducer of cell
scattering in monolayer cultures. Acidic fibroblast growth factor, for
example, can efficiently induce epithelial-mesenchymal transition and
cell scattering in some types of epithelial cells (Boyer et
al., 1993
; Savagner et al., 1994
; Savagner et
al., 1997
). Among the growth factor receptors involved in cell
scattering are c-ros, c-neu (ErbB-2), keratinocyte growth factor
receptor, and trk A. On the other hand, only c-Met activation was
reported to induce the more complex set of morphogenetic changes,
including the formation of the branching tubules in three-dimensional
collagen gel (Sachs et al., 1996
).
In the present work we studied the morphogenetic effects of neuregulin,
also known as neu differentiation factor (NDF) or heregulin. Receptors
to neuregulins belong to the ErbB family of receptor protein kinases
and are widely expressed in many cell types of different organisms from
Caenorhabditis elegans to humans (Burden and Yarden,
1997
). In mammals the neuregulin-ErbB signaling networks were
shown to be involved in many systems, including cardiac development,
Schwann cell and oligodendrocyte differentiation, and some aspects of
neuronal development, as well as in the formation of neuromuscular
synapses (Burden and Yarden, 1997
). The involvement of neuregulin-ErbB
signaling in epithelial morphogenesis is especially interesting. With
the exception of ErbB-4, whose expression is limited to certain
epithelia, the other three ErbB family receptors are widely present in
epithelial cells, whereas mesenchymal cells usually express high levels
of the neuregulin family ligands (Burden and Yarden, 1997
). These data
suggest that neuregulin-ErbB signaling might be involved in
epithelial-mesenchymal interaction. In fact, recent studies suggest
that neuregulin signaling participates in mammary gland development,
where it probably works in concert with HGF/SF (Yang et al.,
1995
; Jones et al., 1996
). These studies were based mainly
on the analysis of neuregulin effects in organ cultures of mammary glands.
In the present work we show that neuregulin can induce various types of morphogenetic responses, ranging from complete scattering to the formation of unique multicellular ring-shaped structures even in monolayer cultures of epithelial cells. Neuregulin was shown to be a potent motogen for cultured epithelial cells, whereas the majority of cell-cell adherens junctions were not disrupted upon neuregulin treatment. We have further demonstrated that these motogenic and morphogenic effects are specific to neuregulin and do not involve the activation of the c-Met signaling pathway. We also show that activation of the ErbB-2 and -3 receptor heterodimers is responsible for this neuregulin-induced epithelial morphogenesis.
| |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Cell Culture and Ligand Treatment
Human gastric carcinoma cell line N87 (Park et al.,
1990
) was obtained from Dr. A. Gazdar (National Cancer Institute,
Bethesda, MD). We also used a subline of a human breast
carcinoma cell line, T47D, which expresses low levels of c-Met receptor
(Keydar et al., 1979
). The CB-1, CB-2, CB-3, and CB-4 cell
lines are Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells stably overexpressing
ErbB-1, -2, -3, and -4, respectively (Tzahar et al., 1996
).
In some experiments we also used squamous carcinoma cell line A431,
breast carcinoma cell line MCF 7, prostate carcinoma cell line DU 145 (Stone et. al., 1978
), and ovarian cell carcinoma cell line
IGROV-1 (Ma et. al., 1998
). These cell lines were kindly
provided to us by Dr. Z. Eshhar (Department of Immunology, The Weizmann
Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel). The cultures were
routinely cultivated in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM),
supplemented with 10% bovine calf serum (Hyclone, Logan, UT) in a
humidified atmosphere with 7.5% CO2 at 37°C. For the
microscopic observation of living cells, the cultures in L15
(Leibovitz) medium, with or without added ligands, were used. A trypsin
and EDTA mixture was used for subculturing.
In the first type of experiments, 5 × 104 cells were plated on 18 × 18-mm2 coverslips, cultured overnight in serum-containing medium, washed once with serum-free medium, and incubated for an additional 1-2 h. These serum-starved cells were then used in the scattering experiments. Alternatively, when the effect of ligands on the mature colonies was studied, 5 × 103 cells per coverslip were plated in serum-containing medium, and the cells were maintained for 4-7 d. Then the ligand was added into serum-free DMEM for different time intervals. To study the effects of ligands on confluent monolayers, a dense cell suspension (106 cells/ml) was plated overnight in a 300-µl drop of serum-containing medium, and the ligand was added to the monolayers for 4-7 d thereafter.
Recombinant rat or human neuregulin ligands, produced in CHO cells,
were obtained from Amgen (Thousand Oaks, CA). CHO-rat NDF-
4 was used
in the majority of the experiments. NDF-
1 and -
2, EGF-like domain
of NDF-
1 (ED NDF-
1), heparin-binding EGF, transforming growth
factor-
(all from Amgen), and EGF (catalog number E-1257; Sigma
Israel Chemicals, Rehovot, Israel) were also used in some
experiments. HGF/SF was purified from NIH 3T3 cells transfected with
HGF/SF as previously described (Rong et al., 1993
). The effect of ligands was analyzed in the concentration range of
1-100 ng/ml.
Immunoprecipitation and Western Blotting
Cells cultured on 50-mm Falcon dishes (Falcon, Lincoln Park, NJ)
or on coverslips were washed with PBS and dissolved in 1 ml lysis
buffer containing 50 mM HEPES (pH 7.5), 150 mM NaCl, 1% Triton X-100,
10% glycerol, 1.5 mM MgCl2, 1 mM Na-orthovanadate, 180 µg/ml aprotinin, 2 mM PMSF, and 180 µg/ml leupeptin. Insoluble material was removed by centrifugation. Protein A Sepharose (CL-4B; Pharmacia, Uppsula, Sweden) or anti-mouse immunoglobulin G agarose beads (Sigma) were suspended in immunoprecipitation buffer (20 mM
HEPES, 150 mM NaCl, 0.1% Triton X-100, 10% glycerol, pH 7.5) and
incubated with the primary antibodies. After washing with the
immunoprecipitation buffer, the beads were incubated with the cell
lysates (containing equal amounts of total cell proteins as determined
by the Bradford method) for 90 min at 4°C. Immunoprecipitated proteins were extracted by boiling the washed beads in electrophoresis sample buffer and examined by gradient (5-15%) SDS-PAGE. For Western blot analysis, electrophoretic bands were electroblotted onto nitrocellulose membranes (Hybond-C; Amersham, Buckinghamshire, United
Kingdom) and probed with the various primary antibodies, followed by
horseradish peroxidase-labeled secondary anti-mouse antibodies or
protein A (Amersham). The list of primary antibodies used included
rabbit polyclonal antibodies to NDF (Amgen), ErbB-1-4 (Santa Cruz
Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA), and HGF/SF (Koochekpour et
al., 1997) and mouse monoclonal antibodies to ErbB-1-4 (Chen et al., 1996
). Immunoreactive bands were detected by
enhanced chemiluminescence, using reagents from Kirkegaard and Perry
(Gaithersburg, MD) and RX films from Fuji Photo Film (Tokyo, Japan).
Radiolabeling of Ligands, Covalent Cross-Linking, and Ligand Binding Assays
Soluble ligands (5 µg of CHO-rat NDF-
4 or ED
NDF-
1) were mixed in an Iodogen-coated (Pierce Chemical, Rockford,
IL) tube with Na125I (1 mCi). After 15 min incubation at
23°C, the mixture was separated on an Excellulose GF-5 column
(Pierce). The specific activity of 125I-labeled ligands
ranged between 2 × 105 and 5 × 105
cpm/ng. For ligand binding 1-2 × 105 cells in
24-well dishes (Nunclone; Nunc, Roskilde, Denmark) were washed once
with DMEM, supplemented with 0.1% BSA (binding buffer), and incubated
for 2 h at 4°C with different concentrations of 125I-labeled ligand. After three washes with binding
buffer, cells were lysed for 15 min at 37°C with 0.5 ml of 0.1 N NaOH
containing 0.1% SDS, and the radioactivity was determined using a
counter. Specific binding was calculated by subtracting the binding of radiolabeled ligands to cells in the presence of a 100-fold excess of
unlabeled ligand.
For covalent cross-linking analysis, 107 cells in six-well dishes were incubated on ice for 2 h with 10 ng/ml iodinated soluble ligand. The chemical cross-linking reagent disuccinimidyl suberate (Pierce) was added (1 nM) for 45 min on ice. The cells were then washed with PBS, lysed, and analyzed by gel electrophoresis.
Microscopy
For observation of living cells, the coverslips were mounted in the microscope chamber at 37°C in L15 serum-free medium. Photographs were taken at different time points before and after addition of the ligand, using Nomarsky (differential interference contrast) optics in a Zeiss (Thornwood, NJ) Axiophot microscope with a water immersion 40×, 0.75 numerical aperture (NA) Achroplan objective or using phase-contrast optics in Zeiss Axiovert with a 16×, 0.4 NA Neofluar objective. The images were acquired using a charge-coupled device camera (Photometrics, Tucson, AZ) and enhanced by Priism (Applied Precision, Issaquah, WA) software with a Silicon Graphics (Mountain View, CA) workstation.
For fluorescence staining, the cells on coverslips were simultaneously
fixed and permeabilized in 3% paraformaldehyde and 0.5% Triton X-100
in PBS for 2 min, and postfixed in 3% paraformaldehyde for 20 min. The
following primary antibodies were used: rabbit anti-pan cadherin
(C3678; Sigma), rabbit anti-
-catenin (C2206; Sigma), monoclonal
anti-plakoglobin (11E4) kindly provided by Dr. M.J. Wheelock
(University of Toledo, Toledo, OH), and a monoclonal antibody to
desmoglein kindly provided by Dr. W.W. Franke (German Cancer Research
Center, Heidelberg, Germany). FITC- and TRITC-labeled goat antibodies
to mouse and rabbit immunoglobulins (Jackson ImmunoRearch, West Grove,
PA) were used as secondary antibodies. Actin was stained with FITC- or
TRITC-labeled phalloidin (Sigma). Stained cultures were examined with
an Axiophot microscope equipped with a 100×, 1.3 NA Plan-Apochromat
objective and photographed using Tmax 3200 film (Eastman Kodak,
Rochester, NY). Stained cells were also analyzed using a Zeiss confocal
laser scanning microscope (LSM 410) equipped with a 25-mW krypton-argon
laser and a 10-mW HeNe laser (488, 543, and 633 maximum lines), as
previously described (Tsarfaty et al., 1992
).
Cell Motility and Scattering Measurements
To assess the rate of cell motility, the phagokinetic track
method was used (Albrecht-Buehler, 1977). Eighteen-millimeter coverslips were coated with colloidal gold, and 2 × 103 cells were seeded on each coverslip. Medium was changed
to a serum-free medium 4 h thereafter with or without
4-neuregulin (10 ng/ml), and incubation proceeded overnight (20 h).
The cells were fixed as described above, stained with DAPI to visualize nuclei, and examined by fluorescence and dark-field microscopy using a
10× Plan-Neofluar objective. The areas of tracks were determined by
projecting individual tracks on a screen and measuring 40-50 randomly
selected tracks for each treatment.
The degree of cell scattering was estimated using an index of
aggregation commonly used in ecological studies (Pielou, 1969
). For
this, the number of cells per field in control and treated cultures was
counted after DAPI staining using a 100× Plan-Apochromat objective.
Fifty independent fields were scored, and the variance (V) and mean (M)
of cell numbers per field were calculated. The index of aggregation
(IA) value is defined as IA = V/M. This index is equal to 1 when the distribution of the cells is random, and the
higher this value, the more "patchy" the cell distribution is
(Pielou, 1969
).
| |
RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Neuregulin Induces Scattering and Formation of Ring-Shaped Multicellular Structures in Epithelial Cell Cultures
To study the effects of neuregulin, N87 human carcinoma cells were
plated at three different densities. Plating of 150 cells per 1 mm2 followed by 1 d of incubation in 10%
serum-containing medium resulted in the formation of small cell
aggregates consisting of 5-10 cells (Figure
1A). After 1 h of serum starvation,
neuregulin was added in serum-free DMEM for 24 h. Examination of
the cells by phase-contrast microscopy or DAPI staining indicated that
this treatment induced scattering (Figure 1, B and C). Quantitative analysis of scattering (see MATERIALS AND METHODS) shows that treatment
with the
4 isoform of neuregulin (NDF-
4, 10 ng/ml) reduced the
index of aggregation in N87 cells from 4.2 in control culture to 1.7. Other isoforms of neuregulin (NDF-
1 and -
2) induced a similar
effect. In contrast, neither the addition of 10% serum nor treatment
with EGF, heparin-binding EGF, or transforming growth factor-
induced a significant decrease in the degree of cell aggregation (our
unpublished results).
|
In a second set of experiments, cells were plated at a very high
density, resulting in the formation of a confluent monolayer within
4 h (Figure 1G). Treatment of the cells with NDF-
4 (100 ng/ml)
for up to 5 d in serum-free medium induced formation of lumen-like
cavities in the monolayer (Figure 1, H and I).
The most intriguing morphogenic effect was observed when cells were plated on the coverslips at a low density (15 cells/mm2) and cultured for 3-4 d in normal medium until coherent colonies containing 10-50 cells were formed (Figure 1D). When stimulated with neuregulin for an additional period of up to 3 d in serum-free medium, these colonies transformed into multicellular rings (Figure 1F), whereas untreated colonies did not change (Figure 1E). The size of these rings was proportional to the cell number in the original colony. When relatively few cells were present in the original colony, a single-row ring was formed (Figure 1F), whereas relatively large colonies transformed into multirow rings (Figure 2, A and C).
|
To determine whether the formation of cell-free areas in the central part of the annular structure is due to cell death in the central part of the colony, we followed the process by DAPI staining, which can reveal apoptotic nuclei. Examination of the cells at different time points did not provide evidence for apoptosis in neuregulin-treated cells. To determine whether ring formation is due to cell movement, neuregulin-treated N87 cells were examined by time-lapse cinematography, which resolved temporal stages of this process (Figure 2, E-H). First, the compact multilayered colony became relatively flat, and the area occupied by the colony increased. Later, a gap appeared in the center of the colony (Figure 2F). The size of this gap gradually increased, resulting in the formation of a definitive ring (Figure 2G). Occasionally, we also observed ring formation by interaction between neighboring cells or cell aggregates (Figure 2H).
The process of ring formation could be modulated by changing ligand concentration. In the absence of ligand a very low frequency of spontaneous ring formation was observed (<1% of the colonies). By elevating ligand concentration, the number of ring-forming colonies increased, and the maximal level of ring formation (~90%) was obtained at 100 ng/ml ligand concentration. Rings formed as a result of neuregulin treatment were stable in 10% bovine calf serum-containing medium for a relatively long period (7 d).
To assess how general the morphogenetic reactions described above are, we examined neuregulin effects on several human epithelial lines of different origins. Among those were A431 (squamous cell carcinoma), DU 145 (prostate carcinoma), IGROV (ovarian cell carcinoma), and T47D and MCF7 (breast carcinomas). We found that all the cell lines studied react to the neuregulin treatment first by ring formation (Figures 3 and 10D), which could be followed by complete scattering. Some of these cell types formed well-developed, ring-shaped multicellular structures after relatively short (6 h) incubation with neuregulin (Figure 3), whereas others (MCF7 and majority of colonies of IGROV cells) underwent complete scattering during this time (our unpublished results). The ratios between the colonies that undergo conversion to the rings and those that undergo complete scattering varied with time after stimulation and were different in different cell lines. Thus, morphogenetic effects induced by neuregulin are general and characteristic for different types of epithelial cells.
|
Neuregulin Increases Cell Motility and Lamellipodial Activity
During both scattering and ring formation neuregulin induced a rapid increase in peripheral lamellipodial activity (Figure 2, compare B and D). This increase of lamellipodial activity was apparent as early as 10 min after neuregulin addition (our unpublished results). In the multicellular rings, two types of cell fronts were present, one facing the exterior of the ring and the other facing the interior. The "inner fronts" were smooth and essentially devoid of lamellipodial extensions, whereas the "outer fronts" were enriched with lamellipodial protrusions (Figure 2D) during the whole period of ring formation.
Stimulation of the lamellipodial extension suggests that cell motility is activated by neuregulin. To investigate whether neuregulin indeed elevates migratory activity, we measured the phagokinetic tracks formed by individual cells or small cell clusters. N87 cells were sparsely plated on the coverslips coated with colloidal gold particles, neuregulin was added 4 h after plating for additional 20 h, and the area of gold-free tracks formed by the moving cells was measured. As shown in Figure 4A, the control colonies cleared the underlying gold from only a relatively small area around them, suggesting that these epithelial cells are essentially immobile. However, the size of the phagokinetic tracks formed by individual cells and small cell clusters in the neuregulin-treated cultures was significantly larger (Figure 4B). Individual cells demonstrated the strongest effect, increasing the average area of the tracks almost sevenfold as a result of neuregulin treatment. A similar tendency was observed with colonies containing up to 10 cells. These colonies typically showed a threefold increase in the phagokinetic track area (Figure 4C).
|
Organization of Cell-Cell Junctions and the Actin Cytoskeleton in Neuregulin-induced Rings
Using immunofluorescence microscopy, we examined the
distribution of the major junctional proteins and actin in N87 cell
cultures before and after neuregulin treatment. First, we showed that
maturation of cell-cell junctions is necessary for the formation of
the neuregulin-induced, ring-shaped multicellular structures. In
particular, we found that colonies cultured for only 1 d before
neuregulin treatment displayed weak cadherin staining in the cell-cell
adherens junctions and diffuse distribution of desmoglein (Figure
5, A and D). These colonies underwent
complete scattering after incubation with neuregulin (Figure 1C). On
the other hand, colonies cultured for 3 d before neuregulin
addition displayed high levels of junctional cadherin and
desmoglein-positive spots in the areas of cell-cell contacts (Figure
5, B and E). Only these "mature" colonies underwent transformation into rings upon addition of neuregulin (Figures 1F and 5, C and F).
Comparison of the distribution of junctional proteins in nontreated colonies and neuregulin-induced multicellular rings showed that both
desmosomes and adherens junctions were not abolished during ring
formation (Figures 5, C and F, and 6, B,
D, and F). In particular, staining of the cells with antibodies against
cadherin,
-catenin, and plakoglobin showed that these proteins were
similarly associated with the cell-cell contacts in the ring-shaped
structures, comparable with those found in nontreated colonies (Figure
6). Moreover, staining for
-catenin was more organized and enriched
in cell-cell junctions of the rings (Figure 6, compare E and F). The
intensity of cadherin and plakoglobin (but not of
-catenin) staining
was slightly reduced in the fully developed rings (Figure 6, compare A
with B and C with D), but cell-cell junctions were still prominently present.
|
|
Comparison of confocal images of the neuregulin-treated N87 cell colonies with those of control cells revealed some substantial changes in actin organization and general morphology. Control colonies consisted of several (3-4) layers of cells (Figure 7, A-C). The basal layer, which was attached to the substrate, contained actin cables (stress fibers) and relatively less developed cell-cell junctions (Figure 7, C and D). The cells in the suprabasal layers had essentially no stress fibers but showed highly developed, actin-rich cell-cell junctions (Figure 7B). The first apparent effect of neuregulin treatment was rapid spreading and flattening of the colonies. These changes were attributable to both flattening of cells in all layers as well as to a decrease in the number of cell layers (Figure 7, compare E with A). The cells in the basal layer increased their spreading area and developed numerous prominent stress fibers (Figure 7, G and H). The fraction of cells forming stress fibers increased in response to neuregulin. At the same time, actin staining of cell-cell contacts did not decrease in the neuregulin-induced rings (Figure 7, compare F with B).
|
Morphogenic Effect of Neuregulin Does Not Involve HGF/SF and c-Met Signaling
Because HGF/SF was shown to induce cell scattering in epithelial cells, we checked whether the neuregulin-mediated morphogenic effects are operating via the same pathway. We did not detect any HGF in the neuregulin sample, nor was neuregulin present in the HGF preparation (Figure 8). We were able to detect only a minor and transient increase in the c-Met tyrosine phosphorylation within 2 min after addition of neuregulin, whereas HGF treatment of the same cells resulted in strong and sustained phosphorylation of the c-Met receptor (Figure 9). The low level of phosphorylation of c-Met induced by neuregulin treatment is most likely insufficient for stimulation of cell scattering, because even a much higher degree of phosphorylation induced in similar cultures by HGF/SF treatment did not stimulate cell motility (the value of the aggregation index of N87 cells treated with HGF/SF was 4.1).
|
|
To further determine possible involvement of the c-Met receptor in neuregulin-induced morphogenic processes, we used a subline of T47D cells that does not express a detectable level of the c-Met receptor (Figure 10A). Yet, these cells do respond to neuregulin treatment similar to N87 cells by an increase of the migratory ability in the phagokinetic assay (Figure 10B) and by colony-to-ring conversion (Figure 10, C and D). HGF/SF, on the other hand, did not induce any effects in T47D. We therefore concluded that the c-Met receptor is not involved in the neuregulininduced morphogenic effects.
|
Morphogenic Processes Induced by Neuregulin Are Mediated by ErbB-2 and -3 Heterodimers
Signaling by ErbB family receptors is triggered by
ligand-induced receptor dimerization (Yarden and Schlessinger, 1987
;
Cochet et al., 1988
; Lee et al., 1989
;
Lehvaslaiho et al., 1989
; Ullrich and Schlessinger, 1990
).
We analyzed the receptor subtype expression in N87 and T47D lines
(Figure 11A). It was shown that T47D
cells express all four members of the ErbB family, whereas N87
expresses ErbB-1, -2, and -3. To determine which of the homodimers or
heterodimers is involved in the neuregulin-induced morphological
changes, N87 cells were stimulated with radiolabeled neuregulin, and
the bound ligand was chemically cross-linked to the receptors and
immunoprecipitated with anti-receptor antibodies. The receptors that
form direct or trans complexes with neuregulin were visualized by
autoradiography. As a control for binding specificity, we carried out
neuregulin binding in the presence of excess unlabeled ED NDF-
1.
These cross-linking experiments revealed two populations of
neuregulin-bound ErbB receptors in cell lysates, corresponding to
monomeric and dimeric forms (Figure 11B). The molecular composition of
these complexes was further determined by immunoprecipitation with
specific antibodies to the four ErbB receptors, indicating that the
ErbB-2 and -3 complex was the only prominent heterodimer formed (Figure
11C).
|
To determine whether activation of the ErbB-2 and -3 complex by
neuregulin is sufficient for the induction of the morphogenic effects,
we added the ligand to CHO cells expressing specific combinations of
ErbB receptors on a low background of the endogenous hamster ErbB-2.
These include CB-1 cells (expressing ErbB-1), CB-2 (expressing ErbB-2),
CB-3 (expressing ErbB-3), CB-4 (expressing ErbB-4) (Tzahar et
al., 1996
), and NEC cells expressing an ErbB-1 and -2 chimeric
receptor (Peles et al., 1992
). Because CHO cells contain
very low levels of cadherin and thus do not form coherent colonies and
stable cell-cell junctions, we could not study scattering or ring
formation in experiments with these cells. We were able, however, to
detect a strong morphogenic response (cavity formation) upon
stimulation of dense cultures of CB-3 cells with the neuregulin (Figure
12F). These cells, containing ErbB-3
and the endogenous hamster ErbB-2 but none of the other cell lines
treated with corresponding ligands, formed prominent cavities (Figure
12). In conclusion, coexpression of ErbB-2 and -3 is sufficient
for at least part of the morphogenic effect of NDF, supporting the idea
that the ErbB-2 and -3 heterodimers mediate the neuregulin-induced
morphogenesis.
|
| |
DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In the present study we demonstrate for the first time that neuregulin can induce specific morphogenic effects in cultured epithelial cells. These responses include activation of cell locomotion leading to the scattering or disintegration of small epithelial islands or the formation of unique, ring-shaped colonies by larger epithelial islands. In dense monolayers neuregulin induced the formation of lumenlike structures.
What are the cellular changes underlying the morphogenetic processes
induced by neuregulin? As shown here, neuregulin is a strong epithelial
motogen stimulating the motility not only of individual cells, but also
of small colonies. Cell motility is a complex process that depends on
several classes of cellular events, including lamellipodial extension,
substrate adhesion, and cell contractility (Bray, 1992
). We observed
increased lamellipodial activity within 10 min after addition of
neuregulin that persisted throughout the scattering or ring formation process.
The involvement of specific changes in cell-substratum adhesion in
neuregulin-induced morphogenesis was not directly investigated in this
study; nevertheless, it was noted that changes in the tissue culture
substratum had an effect on the morphogenic response. Thus, scattering
and ring formation were readily obtained when cells were cultured on
glass coverslips but were hardly detectable when the same cells were
cultured on tissue culture plastic (our unpublished results).
Interestingly, a similar dependence on the substrate was also observed
for the HGF/SF effect. In this case, however, efficient scattering
occurs on a tissue culture plastic surface, whereas adhesion to a glass
surface interfered with the effect (Clark, 1994
). It was also shown
that attachment to vitronectin prevents the scattering effect of
HGF/SF, whereas fibronectin allows it (Clark, 1994
). Moreover, physical
properties of the ECM can significantly modulate the effect of HGF/SF
signaling. It has been shown that patterns of cell scattering and
morphogenesis induced by HGF/SF were distinctly different when cells
were cultured in three-dimensional matrix compared with two-dimensional
tissue culture surfaces (Montesano et al., 1991
; Soriano
et al., 1995
). The potential cross-talk between neuregulin
signaling and ECM-mediated signaling requires further study.
Because the morphological alterations induced by neuregulin are similar
to those previously described for HGF/SF (Stoker et al.,
1987
; Tsarfaty et al., 1992
), we examined the possibility that HGF/SF is also involved in the cell scattering and induction of
luminal structures by neuregulin. It was found in this study that c-Met
was not significantly tyrosine phosphorylated after neuregulin
stimulation. Furthermore, we found that a subline of T47D cells that
does not express c-Met protein responds fully to neuregulin. Individual
cells treated with the neuregulin became more motile, whereas cell
colonies underwent transformation to the ring-shaped structures.
Thus, morphogenic effects of neuregulin in our cells are not mediated
by HGF/SF and c-Met signaling.
Are there specific alterations in cell-cell contacts induced by
neuregulin? As already mentioned, it was shown that classical SFs
disrupt desmosomes and destabilize cadherin-mediated
cell-cell junctions (Watabe et al., 1993
; Savagner et
al., 1997
; Potempa and Ridley, 1998
). Obviously, complete
scattering of immature, small colonies leads to the loss of
intercellular junctions, yet we have no evidence that down-regulation
of cell-cell junctions is involved in neuregulin response. The
possibility that loss of cell junction is secondary to increased cell
motility is supported by the fact that neuregulin treatment of mature
cell colonies with well-developed adherens junctions and
desmosomes does not induce major disruption of these contact
structures. Thus, it may be proposed that the response of cell colonies
to neuregulin treatment involves changes in the fine balance between
locomotion and cell-cell junction formation. Immature colonies with
relatively poor junctions undergo complete scattering, whereas more
mature colonies with well-developed junctions transform into the
ring-shaped structures. In different cell lines the neuregulin
treatment resulted in different ratios between rings and completely
scattered colonies depending on the levels of cell-cell adhesion in
these cultures. Thus the simplest model explaining the observed effects
of neuregulin does not require a direct effect of neuregulin on either
desmosomes or adherens junctions. Taken together, our data show that
the state of the culture before neuregulin treatment significantly affects the final result of this activation. Moreover, these results suggest that formation of complex multicellular structures can be a
result of the shift in a balance between adhesion and motility induced
by extracellular ligand.
Which receptors are involved in the transduction of the
neuregulin-induced morphogenic signals? Based on previous data,
neuregulin can bind to either ErbB-3 or -4 (Tzahar et al.,
1994
). Our results indicate that in N87 cells neuregulin interacts with
ErbB-3 and induces the formation of heterodimers with ErbB-2. The
suggestion that ErbB-2 and -3 comprise the active receptor species
involved in neuregulin-induced morphogenesis is based on the idea that ligands reacting with ErbB family members can induce receptor dimerization. Because ErbB-2 is considered an "orphan receptor" and
does not directly interact with neuregulin, and because the catalytic
function of ErbB-3 is defective and cannot signal by itself (Burden and
Yarden, 1997
), we propose that binding of neuregulin to ErbB-3 induces
formation of signaling heterodimers with ErbB-2, which in turn,
triggers the response. The ability of ErbB-2 to act in a cooperative
manner with other ErbB proteins as a shared, low-affinity receptor
(coreceptor) for multiple stroma-derived growth factors is well
established and plays an important role in oncogenic function of this
receptor in epithelial tumors (Tzahar and Yarden, 1998
).
What are the molecular targets of ErbB-2 and -3-mediated signals that
are responsible for the morphogenic events? Although this aspect was
not directly investigated here, it is noteworthy that one of the major
pathways stimulated by receptor tyrosine kinases, including the ErbB
family, involves activation of MAP kinase (Erk1 and Erk2) (Burden and
Yarden, 1997
). MAP kinase activation, in turn, can affect cell motility
by enhancing the myosin light-chain kinase activity and consequent
increase of cell contractility (Klemke et al., 1997
).
Another target of ErbB-2 and -3 signaling related to the regulation of
cell motility is phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase. This kinase was
shown to be activated by ErbB-2 (Peles et al., 1992
) and
ErbB-3 (Carraway et al., 1995
; Tansey et al., 1996
) and, in turn, can interact with Rac GTPase, thereby increasing cell lamellipodial activity (Bokoch et al., 1996
; Reif
et al., 1996
).
Several previous lines of evidence support the involvement of
neuregulin signaling in the regulation of organogenesis in vivo. First,
the neuregulin-deficient mice as well as mice lacking ErbB-2 or -4 demonstrated lethal defects caused by abnormal heart development. The
morphogenic phase of trabeculae formation did not occur in all three
mutant mice (Gassmann et al., 1995
; Lee et al.,
1995
; Meyer and Birchmeier, 1995
). ErbB-3(
/
) mice display defects in atrioventricular valve formation (Erickson et al., 1997
)
as well as severe neuropathies caused by loss of Schwann cells that accompany peripheral axons of sensory and motor neurons (Riethmacher et al., 1997
). The reason why epithelial defects are not
prominently detectable in neuregulin-targeted mice is not clear but may
be due to early embryonic death of the mutant mice or a relatively late
onset of epithelial organogenesis (Burden and Yarden, 1997
). However,
ErbB-3(
/
) mice already display some abnormalities in stomach and
pancreas development (Erickson et al., 1997
).
In this work we showed for the first time that neuregulin can induce
via ErbB-2 and -3 receptors specific changes in motility and
morphogenetic behavior of cultured epithelial cells. Our results are in
agreement with recent studies showing that neuregulin treatment induces
formation of lobular-alveolar structures in organ cultures of mammary
glands (Yang et al., 1995
; Jones et al., 1996
).
We were able to demonstrate that the primary effect underlying the morphogenetic changes induced by neuregulin is an increase of cell
motility. This is again in agreement with the results demonstrating the
role of neuregulin signaling in another cellular model, development of
the sympathetic nervous system. Experiments with targeted mutations in
the ErbB-2 and -3 or neuregulin-1 genes show that neuregulin and ErbB-2
and -3 signaling is essential for the migration of the neural crest
cells (Britsch et al., 1998
). Neuregulins were shown to
up-regulate motility of Schwann cells (Mahanthappa et.al., 1996
) and epidermal migration (Danilenko et al., 1995
).
Together these results indicate that the neuregulin and ErbB-3 and -2 pathway is a powerful inducer of cell motility. The effect of
this signaling in epithelial cells, however, differs from the
effect of another potent motogen, HGF/SF; destabilization of cell-cell
adhesions is less pronounced in the case of neuregulin, and therefore
the balance between increased motility and preserved cell-cell
adhesion leads to formation of unique multicellular structures, even in conditions of monolayer culture. HGF/SF, on the other hand, can form
branching tubular structures mainly in three-dimensional cultures in
collagen. It is interesting that in a physiological situation, for
example in mammary gland development, both signaling pathways are
involved (Yang et al., 1995
), showing that the corresponding morphogenetic effects are complementary.
In the present work we studied only neoplastically transformed
epithelial cells. All the carcinomas studied were shown to be sensitive
to the morphogenic effects induced by neuregulin. It is known that
enhancement of c-Met signaling in many cases correlates with
metastatic potential of transformed cells (Vande Woude et.
al., 1997
). One can suggest that alteration of the fine balance
between cell-cell adhesion and autonomous cell motility induced by the
neuregulin and ErbB-3 and -2 pathway might also be one of the factors
promoting carcinoma metastasis. In this connection it is interesting
that ErbB-2 and -3 overexpression correlates with high malignancy and
metastatic potential (Myers et al., 1994
).
| |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
This study was supported by grants from the Minerva Foundation (Munich, Germany), the Israel Science Foundation, The Israel Ministry of Science, the Crown Endowment Fund (to A.D.B.), and the Israel Science Foundation and the Rita Marcus Foundation (to B.G.). B.G. holds the E. Neter chair in Cell and Tumor Biology.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
§ Corresponding author. E-mail address: libersha{at}weizmann.weizmann.ac.il.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
/
kidneys express epithelial cells that chemotax and form tubules in response to EGF receptor ligands.
Am. J. Physiol.
272, F222-F228This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
K. Nagata, K. Wada, A. Tatsuguchi, S. Futagami, K. Gudis, K. Miyake, T. Tsukui, and C. Sakamoto Heregulin-{alpha} and heregulin-beta expression is linked to a COX-2-PGE2 pathway in human gastric fibroblasts Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol, June 1, 2006; 290(6): G1243 - G1251. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Galie, C. Sorrentino, M. Montani, L. Micossi, E. Di Carlo, T. D'Antuono, L. Calderan, P. Marzola, D. Benati, F. Merigo, et al. Mammary carcinoma provides highly tumourigenic and invasive reactive stromal cells Carcinogenesis, November 1, 2005; 26(11): 1868 - 1878. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Khoury, M. A. Naujokas, D. Zuo, V. Sangwan, M. M. Frigault, S. Petkiewicz, D. L. Dankort, W. J. Muller, and M. Park HGF Converts ErbB2/Neu Epithelial Morphogenesis to Cell Invasion Mol. Biol. Cell, February 1, 2005; 16(2): 550 - 561. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Gambarotta, D. Garzotto, E. Destro, B. Mautino, C. Giampietro, S. Cutrupi, C. Dati, E. Cattaneo, A. Fasolo, and I. Perroteau ErbB4 Expression in Neural Progenitor Cells (ST14A) Is Necessary to Mediate Neuregulin-1{beta}1-induced Migration J. Biol. Chem., November 19, 2004; 279(47): 48808 - 48816. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. A. Guvakova, J. C. Adams, and D. Boettiger Functional role of {alpha}-actinin, PI 3-kinase and MEK1/2 in insulin-like growth factor I receptor kinase regulated motility of human breast carcinoma cells J. Cell Sci., November 1, 2002; 115(21): 4149 - 4165. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Pagliocca, L. E. Wroblewski, F. J. Ashcroft, P. J. Noble, G. J. Dockray, and A. Varro Stimulation of the gastrin-cholecystokininB receptor promotes branching morphogenesis in gastric AGS cells Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol, August 1, 2002; 283(2): G292 - G299. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. D. Thor, S. M. Edgerton, S. Liu, D. H. Moore II, and D. J. Kwiatkowski Gelsolin as a Negative Prognostic Factor and Effector of Motility in erbB-2-positive Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor-positive Breast Cancers Clin. Cancer Res., August 1, 2001; 7(8): 2415 - 2424. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. S.R. Spencer, D. Graus-Porta, J. Leng, N. E. Hynes, and R. L. Klemke ErbB2 Is Necessary for Induction of Carcinoma Cell Invasion by Erbb Family Receptor Tyrosine Kinases J. Cell Biol., January 24, 2000; 148(2): 385 - 397. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||