![]() |
|
|
Vol. 9, Issue 7, 1627-1631, July 1998
Department of Biology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599-3280
Monitoring Editors: Jennifer Lippincott-Schwartz and W. James Nelson| |
INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The wealth of information from genetic and more recently genomic
studies of the budding yeast has been staggering. However, the small
size of the organism has limited traditional cytological approaches.
Thus there is a disparity in our detailed understanding of the genetic
control of mitosis, for instance, relative to the morphology of
mitosis. The application of time-lapse high-resolution digital-enhanced
differential interference contrast (DE-DIC) and multimode fluoresence
microscopy to studying yeast cell division has revealed a very dynamic
process that reflects the interplay among microtubule dynamics,
microtubule-based motor proteins, and positional determinants in the
mother and bud (Salmon et al., 1998a
,b
; Shaw et
al., 1997a
,b
).
| |
VIDEO SEQUENCES |
|---|
Video Sequence 1: DE-DIC of wild-type mitosis
This video sequence demonstrates the dynamics of nuclear movement, the rates and biphasic nature of spindle pole elongation (anaphase B), and morphological changes in the nucleus during anaphase and the timing of cell cycle progression (Figure 1).
|
A pair of arrows on each frame indicates the spindle orientation. A and B show spindle assembly. A short spindle, spanning the nucleus is evident. C shows preanaphase spindle bisects nucleus. D shows insertion of the nucleus through the neck. E shows spindle elongation into the bud. F shows bilobed nuclei in mother and bud. G shows completion of spindle elongation. In H, the nucleus moves from the distal site in the mother to the cell center. I shows cytokinesis followed by cell separation.
The average cell cycle is 125 ± 9 min. Cells spend ~54 min in
G1 and S phase (I-A). Shortly after S phase a bipolar
spindle is formed and persists at the 2-µm stage for ~ 16 min
(B and C). Anaphase onset (marked by spindle pole separation in D)
through maximal spindle elongation (G) takes 30 min. Anaphase B is
biphasic, characterized by a fast phase (~1 µm/min), followed by
slow phase at about one-third the rate (also see Kahana et
al., 1995
). The time from late anaphase/telophase to cell
separation (G-I, marked by mother and bud snapping apart in H and I)
is ~25 min (data summarized from Yeh et al., 1995
).
Video Sequence 2: A Schematic Representation of Microtubule Dynamics and Nuclear Movement Throughout the Cell Cycle in Budding Yeast.
Tagging expressed proteins with green fluorescent protein (gfp) is
a highly specific and sensitive technique for studying the
intracellular dynamics of proteins and organelles. We have fused gfp to
the carboxyl terminus of the microtubule-based motor protein
cytoplasmic dynein. Dynein-gfp exclusively labels the astral
microtubules in budding yeast. Time-lapse fluorescence microscopy
provided the first views of astral microtubule dynamics in live yeast
cells and revealed several new aspects of microtubule function (Figure
2) (Shaw et al., 1997a
,b
; see
also Carminati and Stearns, 1997
; Straight et al., 1997
, for
microtubules labeled with Tub1-GFP).
|
Video Sequence 3: Microtubule Growth in G1 Is Coupled to Nuclear Movement
Dynamic astral microtubules from a single spindle pole body (SPB) push against the cell cortex and propel the nucleus in the opposite direction (Figure 3). High-resolution DIC overlain with fluorescence (right) and fluorescence only (left) images of unbudded G1 cells are shown. Haploid cells lack an endogenous copy of dynein and contain dynein-GFP. The focus of fluorescence represents the SPB, which could be seen at the edge of the nucleus in DIC (right). A series of 5-min time points at 1-min intervals is displayed from top to bottom. Nuclear movement is from left to right over the time course. The cytoplasmic microtubules were organized into a cone-shaped array facing away from the nucleus. Note the SPB at the leading edge of the nucleus and the cytoplasmic microtubules growing opposite to the direction of movement. As an individual microtubule (or microtubule arrays) extended to the left, the nucleus was propelled rightward.
|
Video Sequence 4: Microtubule Penetration in the Bud Precedes Nuclear Movement to the Bud
The ability of astral microtubules to find the bud and orient the spindle along the mother-bud axis is critical in a cell that chooses the site of cell division before making a mitotic spindle. Astral microtubules are reported to be oriented toward the site of bud growth before bud emergence. However, as shown in the time-lapse DE-DIC images, the nucleus is very dynamic and moves with a high degree of freedom in unbudded cells in a direction away from microtubule growth. Imaging of astral microtubules with dynein-gfp reveals that only after cytoplasmic astral microtubules penetrate the bud does the nucleus migrate to the bud neck (Figure 4). Unbudded haploid cells containing dynein-GFP were captured in the process of bud emergence. A series of DIC (right) and fluorescence (left) images over the time course indicated in the bottom left (in minutes) is shown from top to bottom, in consecutive series. In the top left quadrant, the unbudded cell has a single SPB (embedded in the nuclear envelope), that is positioned at ~5 o'clock. In the next sequence, the SPB has migrated to ~7 o'clock. Note that the astral microtubules trail the SPB and form a conical array. The position of bud emergence is 6 o'clock (see 47 min). The SPB migrates around the cell periphery until the 9-10 o'clock position (47 min), well past the emerging bud. At this time, a long microtubule (7 µm) can be seen extended toward and into the bud. The nucleus migrates in the direction of the bud after microtubule penetration of the bud (57-69 min). The nucleus continues toward the bud neck, in the direction of the microtubule over the next 23 min (69-92 min). Fluorescently labeled SPBs were apparent at 117 min.
|
Video Sequence 5: Differential Timing of Dynein-gfp Accumulation on Spindle Poles
Each cell is born with a single SPB. After SPB duplication, the
astral microtubules originate from a bridge structure between the two
spindle poles (Byers and Goetsch, 1975
). Once the SPBs separated during
spindle formation, cytoplasmic dynein remained associated with one
pole, typically the pole destined for the bud (see movie). There was a
temporal delay (~10 min) after visible separation of the spindle
poles before the second SPB accumulated cytoplasmic dynein.
Video Sequences 5 and 6: Spindle Elongation in Anaphase
Figure 5 shows DIC (bottom) and fluorescence (top) images demonstrating the sequence of anaphase SPB separation. Two SPBs (stored in DIC) of equal intensity can be seen in the top left 10 min before anaphase onset. The SPB closest to the neck is destined for the bud. The nucleus can be seen in DIC where the positions of the spindle poles have been denoted by an asterisk. By 10 min, the fast portion of anaphase is complete, and by 15 min after anaphase onset, a microtubule from one SPB extends into the bud to the tip of the budded cell. Note that the nucleus spans the neck at this time point (15 min after anaphase onset) and that the spindle pole does not lead the nucleus. The microtubule in the bud shortens with spindle elongation (5-min intervals, 15-25 min). The cytoplasmic microtubules associated with the SPB destined for the mother cell remain short and distant from the cortex as the SPB moves toward the base of the mother cell. The cytoplasmic microtubules associated with SPB that are not in contact with the cortex remain dynamic. Note that upon spindle disassembly the nuclei in both the mother and bud cell returned to the G1 movement typified by growing microtubules that propel the nucleus opposite to the direction of microtubule growth.
|
Video Sequences 6 and 7: Behavior of Astral Microtubules in the Process of Mating
Microtubules appear to be stabilized preferentially at the tip of the mating projection (Figure 6). The dynamic attachment of astral microtubules leads to oscillations of the SPB and nucleus toward and away from the mating projection. The rate of oscillation mirrors the dynamics of cytoplasmic microtubules. Thus astral microtubules exhibit transient but persistent interactions with a restricted site in the cell cortex that is the site of cellular deformation preceding cell fusion.
|
After cell fusion, the nuclei congress toward one another (keryogamy), bringing the spindle poles into close proximity (Mating2.tif; Figure 7). The spindle poles fuse (indicated by the arrow in the fluorescent image), and astral microtubules can be seen in the top cell. The site of spindle pole body fusion determines the site of bud emergence in the first zygotic division (arrow in DIC image indicates the site of bud growth). As the poles separate upon the initiation of anaphase there is a linear kinetic progression (1 µm/min) through telophase.
|
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
Online version of this essay contains video
information for Figures 1-7. Online version available at
www.molbiolcell.org.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
B. K. Haarer, A. H. Helfant, S. A. Nelson, J. A. Cooper, and D. C. Amberg Stable Preanaphase Spindle Positioning Requires Bud6p and an Apparent Interaction between the Spindle Pole Bodies and the Neck Eukaryot. Cell, May 1, 2007; 6(5): 797 - 807. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Veith, N. Scherr, V. P. Efimov, and R. Fischer Role of the spindle-pole-body protein ApsB and the cortex protein ApsA in microtubule organization and nuclear migration in Aspergillus nidulans J. Cell Sci., August 15, 2005; 118(16): 3705 - 3716. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Doncic, E. Ben-Jacob, and N. Barkai From The Cover: Evaluating putative mechanisms of the mitotic spindle checkpoint PNAS, May 3, 2005; 102(18): 6332 - 6337. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Du, S. Ferro-Novick, and P. Novick Dynamics and inheritance of the endoplasmic reticulum J. Cell Sci., June 15, 2004; 117(14): 2871 - 2878. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. E. Rischitor, S. Konzack, and R. Fischer The Kip3-Like Kinesin KipB Moves along Microtubules and Determines Spindle Position during Synchronized Mitoses in Aspergillus nidulans Hyphae Eukaryot. Cell, June 1, 2004; 3(3): 632 - 645. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Kusch, A. Meyer, M. P. Snyder, and Y. Barral Microtubule capture by the cleavage apparatus is required for proper spindle positioning in yeast Genes & Dev., July 1, 2002; 16(13): 1627 - 1639. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. L. Fehrenbacher, D. Davis, M. Wu, I. Boldogh, and L. A. Pon Endoplasmic Reticulum Dynamics, Inheritance, and Cytoskeletal Interactions in Budding Yeast Mol. Biol. Cell, March 1, 2002; 13(3): 854 - 865. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Farkasovsky and H. Kuntzel Cortical Num1p Interacts with the Dynein Intermediate Chain Pac11p and Cytoplasmic Microtubules in Budding Yeast J. Cell Biol., January 16, 2001; 152(2): 251 - 262. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Schuyler and D Pellman Search, capture and signal: games microtubules and centrosomes play J. Cell Sci., January 1, 2001; 114(2): 247 - 255. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Lee, J. S. Tirnauer, J. Li, S. C. Schuyler, J. Y. Liu, and D. Pellman Positioning of the Mitotic Spindle by a Cortical-Microtubule Capture Mechanism Science, March 24, 2000; 287(5461): 2260 - 2262. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
J Vogel and M Snyder The carboxy terminus of Tub4p is required for gamma-tubulin function in budding yeast J. Cell Sci., January 11, 2000; 113(21): 3871 - 3882. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Fujiwara, K. Tanaka, E. Inoue, M. Kikyo, and Y. Takai Bni1p Regulates Microtubule-Dependent Nuclear Migration through the Actin Cytoskeleton in Saccharomyces cerevisiae Mol. Cell. Biol., December 1, 1999; 19(12): 8016 - 8027. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Lee, S. K. Klee, M. Evangelista, C. Boone, and D. Pellman Control of Mitotic Spindle Position by the Saccharomyces cerevisiae Formin Bni1p J. Cell Biol., March 8, 1999; 144(5): 947 - 961. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. M. Waterman-Storer Microtubules and Microscopes: How the Development of Light Microscopic Imaging Technologies Has Contributed to Discoveries about Microtubule Dynamics in Living Cells Mol. Biol. Cell, December 1, 1998; 9(12): 3263 - 3271. [Full Text] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||