|
|
|
|
Vol. 9, Issue 8, 2325-2335, August 1998


Institute of Cell and Molecular Biology, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH9 3JR, United Kingdom
Submitted April 2, 1998; Accepted May 19, 1998| |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The Schizosaccharomyces pombe win1-1 mutant has a defect in the G2-M transition of the cell cycle. Although the defect is suppressed by wis1+ and wis4+, which are components of a stress-activated MAP kinase pathway that links stress response and cell cycle control, the molecular identity of Win1 has not been known. We show here that win1+ encodes a polypeptide of 1436 residues with an apparent molecular size of 180 kDa and demonstrate that Win1 is a MAP kinase kinase kinase that phosphorylates and activates Wis1. Despite extensive similarities between Win1 and Wis4, the two MAP kinase kinase kinases have distinct functions. Wis4 is able to compensate for loss of Win1 only under unstressed conditions to maintain basal Wis1 activity, but it fails to suppress the osmosignaling defect conferred by win1 mutations. The win1-1 mutation is a spontaneous duplication of 16 nucleotides, which leads to a frameshift and production of a truncated protein lacking the kinase domain. We discuss the cell cycle phenotype of the win1-1 cdc25-22 wee1-50 mutant and its suppression by wis genes.
| |
INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Investigations on the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces
pombe have been central in unraveling the mechanisms that regulate cell cycle transitions, in particular entry into mitosis from G2.
Genetical analysis led to the identification of Cdc2, and of its
regulators Cdc25 and Wee1 as key players in G2-M regulation. Further
investigations have led to the identification of several other genes
whose products play a rate-limiting role in the transition into
mitosis (MacNeill and Fantes, 1995
).
The S. pombe win1-1 mutant was isolated as a mutation that
reverses the effect of wee1-50 in suppressing the
temperature-sensitive cell cycle arrest of cdc25-22 (Ogden
and Fantes, 1986
). Among five wis genes isolated as
multicopy suppressors of the cdc phenotype of the triple mutant
win1-1 cdc25-22 wee1-50 (Warbrick and Fantes, 1992
),
wis1+ and wis4+ encode a
MAP kinase kinase (MAPKK) and a MAP kinase kinase kinase (MAPKKK),
respectively (Warbrick and Fantes, 1991
; Samejima et al.,
1997
). Identification of the win1+ gene is
crucial for understanding how these genes affect the cell cycle
phenotype of win1-1 cdc25-22 wee1-50. Several attempts to
clone the win1+ gene have been made, but its
molecular identity remains unknown (Warbrick and Fantes, 1992
).
In addition to their cell cycle effects, Wis1 and Wis4 are components
of a stress-responsive MAP kinase signaling pathway. Similar pathways
exist in a range of eukaryotic cell types (Brewster et al.,
1993
; Galcheva-Gargova et al., 1994
; Han et al.,
1994
; Millar et al., 1995
; Shiozaki and Russell, 1995
). In
S. pombe, the Wis1 MAPKK is activated in response to osmotic
and other types of stress, resulting in increased phosphorylation of
the MAP kinase homologue Spc1 (= Sty1 = Phh1) (Millar et
al., 1995
; Shiozaki and Russell, 1995
; Kato et al.,
1996
). wis1+ and spc1+
are essential for survival under conditions of extreme heat, osmolarity, oxidation, or poor nutrition. Wis4 (= Wik1 = Wak1) is
a MAPKKK that phosphorylates and activates Wis1; however, the phenotype
of wis4
mutants is not as severe as those of
wis1 deletion strains (Samejima et al., 1997
;
Shieh et al., 1997
; Shiozaki et al., 1997
).
Activation of Wis1 is observed in wis4 deletion strains after exposure to high osmolarity, although activation of Wis1 under
these conditions requires phosphorylation of Wis1 at the conserved
Ser469 and Thr473 residues (Samejima et
al., 1997
). These observations suggest that Wis1 is activated by
other MAPKKK(s) in response to osmotic stress, and that Wis4 is
therefore one of several redundant MAPKKKs that function upstream of
Wis1. Genetic evidence suggests that Win1 is also an activator of Wis1,
which functions in parallel with Wis4 and plays a major role in
osmostress signaling (Samejima et al., 1997
).
Here we identify an MAPKKK structurally homologous to Wis4 and present evidence that it is encoded by win1+. We show that Win1 activates Wis1 in vivo and in vitro and is a major transducer of osmostress signaling; cells lacking Win1 function show a reduced basal level of Wis1 activity, and their ability to activate Wis1 in response to osmotic stress is severely compromised. win1-1 is a frameshift mutation, and the mutant gene product is predicted to lack the kinase domain.
| |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Strains and Media
Standard techniques for handling S. pombe are
described elsewhere (Moreno et al., 1991
; Alfa et
al., 1993
). S. pombe cells were grown in YE (yeast
extract medium) or EMM2 (minimal medium) (Alfa et
al., 1993
). All of the strains used for phosphotyrosine assay
carried the tagged spc1 allele derived from KS1376 (Shiozaki and Russell, 1995
).
PCR Primers
For expression of the catalytic domain of the Win1 protein kinase in S. pombe, the following sequences were used to design PCR primers to clone the last 400 aa of the gene, which was expressed from the pREP1 nmt1 promoter: 5'-GTCGACGTAGTATGGACCAACAA-3' and 5'-AGATCTAATGGTGATGGTGATGGTGGCGGCCGCCAAGTTCCAACGGAGCACCAT-3'.
Physical Mapping of win1+
One plasmid that contained the tps19+
gene was isolated by complementation of the temperature-sensitive
(ts) growth phenotype of the tps19 mutant. A 5-kb
BamHI fragment from the plasmid was used to screen a P1
phage library (Hoeheisel et al., 1993
) and cosmid libraries
(Hoeheisel et al., 1993
; Mizukami et al., 1993
) by hybridization. For selection of S. pombe transformants
carrying P1 phage and cosmids the ura4+ gene and
ars1 sequences were first introduced by a method that exploits a
bacterial transposon (Morgan et al., 1996
). The
ura4+-ars1-tagged phage or cosmids were used to
transform the win1-1 cdc25-22 wee1-50 mutant to score their
ability to suppress the ts phenotype.
Genetic Mapping of win1-1
The win1-1 locus was mapped on chromosome I by
mitotic haploidization of the diploid strain
win1-1/+
ura1-131/+ lys1-171/+
leu1-32/+ ade6-704/+
mat2-102/h- (Alfa et al., 1993
). Preliminary mapping
of win1-1 within chromosome I was carried out by random
spore analysis in swi5 background (Schmidt et
al., 1987
), followed by fine mapping by tetrad analysis with
markers on the short arm of chromosome I. The relative positions of
win1-1, tps19, and rad1-1 were
determined by three-point cross-analysis carried out on random spore
colonies.
Purification of Win1 Kinases
Win1 proteins tagged with 6× histidine were expressed from the
pREP1 nmt1 promoter for 12 h at 30°C in the
wis1
strain. S. pombe cells were disrupted by
glass beads in lysis buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, 0.4 M NaCl, 10%
glycerol, 10 mM 2-mercaptoethanol, 1 mM PMSF). The cleared lysate was
incubated with Ni-NTA-Sepharose beads (Qiagen, Chatsworth, CA)
in the presence of 0.1% NP-40 and 20 mM imidazole. The tagged proteins
were eluted by the same buffer containing 250 mM imidazole and dialyzed
against storage buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl, 20%
glycerol).
Coupled Kinase Assay
Recombinant GST-Wis1(K349R) (0.16 µg) purified from
Escherichia coli was incubated in buffer containing 25 µM
ATP, with Win1
N or Win1
N(K1149R) purified from S. pombe equivalent to 2 × 107 cells. After 10 min
incubation at 30°C, 1.3 µg of catalytically inactive MAPK substrate
was added in the presence of [
-32P]ATP (0.2 µCi/µl). The mixture was incubated for an additional 10 min at
30°C, and the reactions were stopped by addition of 3× SDS loading
buffer. The MAPK substrate GST-Spc1 was purified from an S. pombe
wis1
strain, essentially according to the method of Shiozaki
and Russell (1997)
. The method for purifying GST-Wis1 from E. coli is described by Samejima et al. (1997)
.
Phosphotyrosine Assay
S. pombe cells were collected by filtration.
Cells were washed once with STOP buffer (50 mM NaF, 100 mM NaCl, 10 mM
EDTA, 1 mM NaN3) before being frozen in liquid nitrogen.
Spc1 protein was isolated on Ni-NTA beads (Qiagen) in denaturing buffer
(6 M guanidine HCl, 0.1 M Na phosphate, 0.1 M Tris-HCl, pH 8.0) as described by Shiozaki and Russell (1995)
. Spc1 and phosphotyrosine were
detected by Western blotting by ECL (Amersham, Buckinghamshire, UK).
The primary antibodies used to detect the hemagglutinin (HA) epitope
and phosphotyrosine were 12CA5 (Boehringer Mannheim, Indianapolis, IN)
and 4G10 (Upstate Biotechnology, Lake Placid, NY), respectively.
| |
RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Identification of a Candidate Gene for win1+
Because attempts to clone the win1+ gene by
complementation were unsuccessful (Warbrick and Fantes, 1992
), we
decided to clone the win1+ gene by positional
cloning. win1-1 was mapped on chromosome I, 5 cM from the
tps19 locus in the direction of rad1. As a
preliminary step to position the win1+ gene on
the physical map of the S. pombe genome, the
tps19+ gene was cloned and was used as a probe
to screen ordered cosmid libraries and a P1 phage library (Hoheisel
et al., 1993
; Mizukami et al., 1993
). 3F9 is one
of the positive clones in the P1 phage library, and subsequent analysis
revealed that it contains the tps19+ gene at the
very end of the insert, which extends in the direction of the
rad1 locus (Figure 1A). There
is a single region within 3F9 not represented by cosmids from either
library. 3F9 suppressed the ts phenotype of the win1-1 cdc25-22
wee1-50 triple mutant, whereas none of the cosmids tested did
(Figure 1A), suggesting that the gene responsible for the suppression,
or a part of it, lay in the "gap" region. The DNA of the gap region
was recovered by PCR amplification, and its DNA sequence was
determined. A single ORF spans the gap, suggesting that it is
the win1+ gene. The ORF encodes a polypeptide of
1436 amino acid residues with a protein kinase domain at positions
1127-1410 (Figure 1B). The kinase domain of the Win1 protein is most
similar to S. pombe Wis4 and Saccharomyces
cerevisiae SSK2 and SSK22; within the region, 163 of 291 aa
residues (56%) are identical to Wis4. The homology extends beyond the
kinase domain throughout the protein, apart from the first ~180
residues, where we find no homology to any protein in current
databases.
|
Detection of Full-Length Win1 Protein
With the aim of identifying the full-size
win1+ gene product, we constructed a strain in
which the chromosomal win1+ gene was modified
such that the Win1 protein was tagged with the HA epitope at the
carboxyl terminus (Figure 2A). We
confirmed by Southern analysis that the construct had integrated at the intended locus. A polypeptide of 180 kDa was detected by the anti-HA antibody (12CA5) in the cell extract of the tagged strain (Figure 2B),
whereas no signal was detected in the cell extract of a parental win1
or untagged wild-type strain.
|
Win1 Phosphorylates and Activates Wis1 In Vitro
The amino acid sequence similarity of Win1 to MAPKKKs, in
particular to Wis4, suggests that Win1 is a protein kinase that phosphorylates Wis1. To test this, we expressed an amino-terminal truncated Win1 protein, Win1
N, containing the catalytic domain, in
S. pombe. We affinity purified the protein and tested
whether it could phosphorylate recombinant GST-Wis1(K349R) in vitro
(Figure 3A). This substrate purified from
bacteria does not autophosphorylate because of a mutation in the
conserved lysine residue essential for ATP binding (Figure 3A, lane 5).
The GST-Wis1(K349R) was phosphorylated when incubated with the
wild-type Win1
N. Incubation with the catalytically defective mutant
protein Win1
N(K1149R), which has the conserved lysine residue in the
ATP binding domain mutated to arginine, had a much reduced effect.
|
We then tested whether this phosphorylation by Win1 led to activation
of Wis1 kinase activity. GST-Spc1 was expressed in an S. pombe
wis1
strain, and the purified protein was used as a substrate
to assay Wis1 kinase activity in vitro. GST-Wis1 protein produced in
bacteria shows very low kinase activity (Figure 3B, lane 1). Wis1
kinase activity was greatly enhanced after preincubation with Win1
protein in the presence of ATP (Figure 3B, lane 2). The
kinase-defective mutant Win1
N (K1149R) had a much reduced effect
(Figure 3B, lane 3): a likely reason for the difference in Figure 3B
between lanes 1 and 3 is a contribution from a minor population of
phosphorylated Wis1 molecules (see Figure 3A, lane 2). GST-Wis1(K349R)
did not phosphorylate GST-Spc1 under any conditions (Figure 3B, lanes 4 and 5). These observations show that Win1 is able to activate Wis1 in
vitro and excludes the possibility that Win1 directly phosphorylates
GST-Spc1. These data thus show that phosphorylation by Win1 is
sufficient to activate the Wis1 kinase.
Conserved Wis1 Phosphorylation Sites Are Required for Activation by Win1 In Vivo
We asked whether Win1 activates Wis1 in vivo by examining the
effect of overexpression of the win1+ gene in
S. pombe. In many cases, the amino termini of MAPKKK homologues are not essential for their kinase activity, and indeed, the
truncated proteins are often more active than their full-length counterparts in vivo (Cairns et al., 1992
; Lee and Levin,
1992
; Stevenson et al., 1992
; Maeda et al., 1995
;
Samejima et al., 1997
; Shiozaki et al., 1997
).
The carboxyl-terminal 400 residues of Win1, Win1
N, which contains
the entire catalytic domain, was expressed from the nmt1
promoter, so that its transcription was regulatable by thiamine
(Maundrell, 1990
). In vivo Wis1 kinase activity was assayed by the
level of phosphotyrosine on Spc1 (Shiozaki and Russell, 1995
).
Overexpression of win1
N in wild-type cells resulted in
more phosphotyrosine on Spc1, whereas the kinase-defective mutant
allele of win1
N had no such effect (Figure
4A). We detected no phosphotyrosine in
wis1
cells under these conditions, consistent with
several reports that wis1+ is essential for
tyrosine phosphorylation of Spc1 (Millar et al., 1995
;
Shiozaki et al., 1995
).
|
MAPKKs have conserved serine/threonine and threonine residues between
kinase subdomains VII and VIII, and phosphorylation of these residues
plays a central role in the regulation of kinase activity (Alessi
et al., 1994
; Zheng and Guan 1994
). Wis1 has such residues
at positions 469 and 473, and they are essential for response to
osmotic stress (Samejima et al., 1997
). wis1-4 is
an allele that has both Ser469 and Thr473
mutated to nonphosphorylatable glutamate residues. Cells carrying this
allele are insensitive to overexpression of win1
N. The
phosphotyrosine level on Spc1 remained at the same level in the
wis1-4 mutant, irrespective of the expression level of
win1
N (Figure 4), suggesting that phosphorylation at
Ser469 and Thr473 of Wis1 is essential for the
action of Win1.
Hyperactivation of Wis1 by phosphorylation is toxic to wild-type cells
and inhibits colony formation (Samejima et al., 1997
), as is
overexpression of the wis1+ gene (Shiozaki and
Russell, 1995
). Consistent with the phosphotyrosine data shown above,
overexpression of win1
N was toxic in wild-type cells, and
colony formation was inhibited (Figure 4). In contrast, overexpression
of mutant win1
N(K1149R) protein had no such effect, showing that increased kinase activity was responsible for the toxicity. The toxic phenotype was suppressed in wis1
and
wis1-4 strains, suggesting that Win1 function requires
phosphorylation of Wis1 at Ser469 and Thr473
(Figure 4). Taken together, these results suggest that Win1
phosphorylates these residues to activate Wis1.
win1-1 Mutation Site Lies in the New MAPKKK Coding Region
We asked whether the DNA from a win1-1 strain has a mutation in the ORF encoding the new MAPKKK. The ORF region was amplified by PCR from genomic DNA isolated from a win1-1 strain, and the PCR product was used as a template for DNA sequencing. An insertion of 16 nucleotides was found compared with the wild-type sequence. The wild-type sequence has a pair of repetitive sequences (TATCCTTCA) at positions 1347 ... 1355 and 1364 ... 1372 (Figure 5). In win1-1, the heptamer sequence, GTCGTTC, which is flanked by the TATCCTTCA repeat, is duplicated with an extra copy of TATCCTTCA in between (Figure 5). This duplication of 16 nucleotides results in a frameshift that replaces the carboxyl 1002 residues including the kinase domain with 23 irrelevant amino acids (Figure 5). The mutant protein thus has 456 residues in total, with the amino-terminal portion of the original 433 residues. The presence of such a mutation in win1-1 strain strongly suggests that the ORF is the win1+ gene. Moreover, the disruption of this ORF produced phenotypes very similar, if not identical, to win1-1 (see below).
|
Disruption of the MAPKKK Gene Is Sufficient to Give win1-1 Phenotype
The chromosomal region that encodes the last 278 residues
(1159-1436) of the win1+ gene was replaced by
the S. pombe ura4+ gene, removing most of the
protein kinase catalytic domain from the genome. The resulting strain
is viable, and in a cross between the deletion strain and
win1-1, all of the 33 tetrads dissected were parental
ditype, confirming very close linkage of the deletion mutation to
win1-1. The chromosomal deletion is hereafter referred to as
win1
. Several phenotypes conferred by the
win1
mutation were examined and compared with the
win1-1 mutant. Dividing win1
cells are longer
than the wild type during growth on EMM (our unpublished observations),
suggesting a mitotic delay as in win1-1 (Ogden and Fantes,
1986
). The double mutant, cdc25-22 wee1-50 and the
win1-1 single mutant can grow and make colonies at 36°C. However, the combination of the three mutations makes a cell unable to
grow at this temperature, and the cell shows a cdc phenotype (Ogden and
Fantes, 1986
). The win1
mutation had a similar effect, and extremely elongated cells were observed with the triple mutant win1
cdc25-22 wee1-50 (our unpublished
observations).
Consistent with the demonstration that the Win1 MAPKKK is an activator
of Wis1 (Figures 3 and 4), the phosphotyrosine content of Spc1 in
win1
was lower than in the wild-type strain (our
unpublished observations), as in win1-1 (Samejima et
al., 1997
). Moreover, the toxicity of overexpression of
wis1+ was alleviated in win1
strain just as in win1-1 and wis4
strains (our
unpublished observations). The Wis1 kinase is activated when the
wild-type cell is exposed to high osmolarity, and its substrate Spc1 is
rapidly tyrosine phosphorylated (Millar et al., 1995
; Shiozaki and Russell, 1995
). On the contrary, the phosphotyrosine level
remained low in both win1
and win1-1 strains
(our unpublished observations; Samejima et al., 1997
). This
suggests that Win1 is required to activate Wis1 in response to high
osmolarity.
Win1 and Wis4 Have Distinct Biological Roles in Stress Response
Previous reports have demonstrated that Wis4 phosphorylates and
activates Wis1. However, the question of whether Wis4 transmits an
osmostress signal to Wis1 is controversial, and the physiological function of Wis4 is not established (Samejima et al., 1997
;
Shieh et al., 1997
; Shiozaki et al., 1997
). We
tested whether introduction of multiple copies of the
wis4+ gene could suppress the phenotypes of
win1-1 observed when the strain is challenged by high
osmolarity.
Wild-type cells undergo morphological changes on a high-osmolarity
medium, just as when the wis1+ gene is
overexpressed from a strong promoter or when wis1 is activated by
ectopic overexpression of a truncated MAPKKK gene (Shiozaki and
Russell, 1995
; Samejima et al., 1997
). Wild-type cells are
short and swollen on medium containing 1.2 M KCl, whereas win1-1 cells are more elongated than on normal medium
(Samejima et al., 1997
; Figure
6A). The win1-1 strain
carrying a wis4+ plasmid appears more similar to
win1-1 than to the wild type on high-osmolarity medium, in
that it retains the same width as on EMM and cell length is greater
than on the control medium (Figure 6A). win1-1 cells
carrying multiple copies of wis4+ are shorter
than the control win1-1 cells in both conditions (with or
without KCl). Thus a single copy of the win1+
gene (in wild-type cells) allows morphological change in response to
high osmotic conditions. However, in the absence of
win1+ function, even the presence of multiple
copies of wis4+ does not restore this ability.
|
Another effect of the win1-1 mutation relevant to osmostress response is a change in the phosphotyrosine content of Spc1. In wild-type cells, Spc1 is rapidly tyrosine phosphorylated after exposure to 0.6 M KCl, whereas this response is lost in win1-1 cells. Although the presence of multiple copies of wis4+ in win1-1 cells raised the basal level of tyrosine phosphorylation, we observed no significant increase in response to KCl treatment (Figure 6B). This observation argues against a major role of wis4 in response to high osmolarity.
| |
DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
We have identified a second MAPKKK homologue of the Wis4 class in
S. pombe. Several lines of evidence argue that it is encoded by the win1+ gene, previously only identified by
the single win1-1 mutation. The tight genetic linkage
between win1-1 and a marker integrated at the new MAPKKK
gene (win1
) suggests that their chromosomal locations are
very close. The genetic distance of 5 cM between win1-1 and
a nearby marker, tps19, agrees well with the physical distance of 30-40 kb from tps19+ to the MAPKKK
gene. It is the only gene on 3F9 that is not represented on any of the
overlapping sets of cosmids, and the fact that 3F9, but no cosmids,
suppresses the ts phenotype of the win1-1 cdc25-22 wee1-50
triple mutant suggests strongly that the MAPKKK gene is win1. Further supporting evidence is the discovery of a
frameshift mutation within the MAPKKK ORF in the win1-1
strain, which would cause a truncation eliminating the
carboxyl-terminal kinase domain. Consistent with this, the phenotypes
of win1-1 and win1
are almost identical.
Furthermore, all the phenotypes of win1-1 can be very well
explained by Win1 being an MAPKKK that activates Wis1. Further work
will be needed for a full characterization of Win1: in particular the
isolation of a full-length clone, which has so far eluded us, for
reasons discussed below.
In a previous report, we showed that Wis1 can be activated by
phosphorylation at its conserved activation residues, presumably because of the action of one or more MAPKKKs, one of which is Wis4. We
also reported that Wis4 could not account for the response to osmotic
stress but showed that the response was almost abolished by a mutation
in win1, whose molecular identity was not then known. We now
show that Win1 is an MAPKKK homologous to Wis4. This explains very well
that although phosphorylation of Wis1 is essential for activation of
Wis1 in response to high osmolarity, wis4+ is
not required, and that Win1 activates Wis1 in parallel to Wis4.
S. pombe Mcs4, the presumed receptor of a bacterial-like two-component phospho-relay system, has been reported to act upstream of the Wis4-Wis1-Spc1 pathway (Cottarel, 1997
; Shieh et
al., 1997
; Shiozaki et al., 1997
). By analogy with the
HOG pathway in S. cerevisiae where a similar two-component
system is implicated in detection of high osmolarity and in the
activation of two MAPKKKs (Maeda et al., 1994
), it might be
expected that Wis4 plays a role in transmitting osmostress signals to
the Wis1-Spc1 pathway. However, there is so far no evidence for
wis4+ playing a major role in osmostress
signaling in wild-type cells. In addition, the data we present here
show that wis4+ cannot suppress the
win1-1 phenotypic defects that are manifest under conditions
of high osmolarity. A model that summarizes these and other
observations is shown in Figure 7.
|
The strategies for detection of high osmolarity and transduction of
these signals vary in different organisms. In Saccharomyces cerevisiae, a pair of MAPKKKs, Ssk2p and Ssk22p, are required to
transduce the signal from the bacterial-like two-component system,
which uses phosphate transfer from histidine to aspartate, to the Pbs2
MAPKK homologue (Parkinson and Kofoid, 1992
; Maeda et al.,
1994
). Pbs2 can alternatively be activated by the Ste11 MAPKKK in an
unknown way that does not involve the SLN1-YPD1-SSK1 two-component
system (Posas and Saito, 1997
), indicating that a two-component
phospho-relay system is not the only way to detect and transduce
high-osmolarity signals. In mammalian cells, multimerization of
receptor tyrosine kinases such as the epidermal growth factor, interleukin 1, and tumor necrosis factor receptors in response to high
osmotic stress leads to activation of a c-jun NH2-terminal kinase (JNK) via MEKK-1, but no evidence for the presence of a bacterial-like two-component system has been reported (Rosette and
Karin, 1996
). A better understanding of the Win1 MAPKKK is expected to
pave the way to understanding the mechanism of detection and
transduction of high-osmolarity signals in S. pombe.
The win1-1 mutation contains an insertion of 16 nucleotides
within the amino-terminal domain. The win1-1 mutant was
obtained fortuitously during an attempt to isolate plasmids that
suppress wee1-50 and is probably a spontaneous mutation
(Ogden and Fantes, 1986
). It appears that the extra sequence has arisen
by duplication of a tandemly repeated sequence and the short sequence
between the repeats. We observe an occasional reversion of
win1-1 phenotype, which might be explained by a similar
oblique recombination event reversing the original mutation. The tandem
duplication present in the win1+ gene may help
explain why it has proved so difficult to obtain full-length clones
either by screening of several libraries (Warbrick and Fantes, 1992
) or
by attempting to subclone the activity from phage 3F9 (Samejima,
unpublished observations). Propagation of tandem repeats in E. coli can lead to recombination and loss of nucleotide sequence,
which in the case of win1+ would cause a
frameshift and loss of function. However there may be other factors
involved, because both of the ordered cosmid libraries constructed have
a gap at the same location, which corresponds to the
win1+ gene.
Until the molecular identity of the win1+ gene
and nature of the win1-1 mutation were known, the phenotype
of the triple mutant could not be fully interpreted. We have shown that
Win1 is an MAPKKK that activates the Wis1 MAPKK, and that
win1-1 is a loss of function mutation. These findings
account for the basis of our previous observation that Wis1 is less
active in the win1-1 mutant (Samejima et al.,
1997
). Reduced Wis1 activity in the win1-1 mutant is one
factor responsible for the cell cycle defect of wee1-50 cdc25-22
win1-1 at 35°C, because cdc25-22 wee1-50 is viable at
this temperature. It is reduced Wis1 activity rather than the the
specific loss of Win1 activity that seems to be important, because the
combination of cdc25-22 wee1-50 with other mutations that
reduce the level of Wis1 activity (e.g., spc1
and
wis4
) all result in similar phenotypes (Shiozaki and
Russell, 1995
; our unpublished data). Because wee1-50 win1-1
is viable at 35°C, lethality of the triple mutant also requires the
cdc25-22 defect. By analogy with the synthetic lethality of
the cdc25-22 mutation with wis1
or
spc1
(Shiozaki and Russell, 1995
, 1996
), the lethality of
wee1-50 cdc25-22 win1-1 at 35°C is probably a combined
result of two defects: one in the Wis1 pathway and the other in Cdc25 activity. This rather simplified view of the phenotype might be useful
in understanding the suppression of wee1-50 cdc25-22 win1-1 by the various wis genes. Suppression could occur either by
alleviation of the cdc25-22 mutation or by gain of Wis1
activity to compensate for the partial loss attributable to the
win1-1 mutation. Overexpression of the various
wis genes might suppress by either mechanism.
The win1-1 mutant gene encodes a truncated protein lacking a
kinase domain, and it is therefore impossible for wis genes
to restore Win1 kinase activity per se in win1-1 mutants.
Enhanced Wis1 kinase activity, however, can compensate for loss of win1 function. For instance, overexpression of wis1+
or wis4+ increases the total kinase activity of
Wis1 available and substitutes for the missing contribution from
win1+ under unstressed conditions. Unlike the
case for wis1+ and wis4+,
the underlying mechanism for suppression by other wis genes is not evident. The wis2+ gene encodes a
cyclophilin of the Cyp-40 class (Weisman et al., 1996
). Its
predicted peptidyl-prolyl isomerase activity may be required for
activation or stabilization of one or more of the kinases in the
osmosensing cascade, because some protein kinases (e.g., Wee1 and Src)
need a chaperone complex for their function in vivo (Aligue et
al., 1994
; Gerber et al., 1995
; Dey et al., 1996
). It is, however, more plausible that wis2+
(and wis3+) suppress the reduced activity of the
the cdc25-22 mutant protein, because they suppress other
mutations in a cdc25-22 wee1-50 background, and neither
wis2+ nor wis3+
suppresses the win1-1 single mutant (Warbrick and Fantes,
1992
).
The win1-1 cdc25-22 wee1-50 mutant provides a rather
sensitive way to isolate genes in two apparently distinct mitotic
inducing systems, the wis1 pathway and Cdc25 activation. The
effect of a slight enhancement of Cdc25 phosphatase activity in a
cdc25-22 mutant strain might be more pronounced in a
wee1 mutant background, which might increase the sensitivity
of cells to a weak suppressor. However, cdc25-22 wee1-50
cells are able to grow at all temperatures, so that no selection for
suppressors of this type is available. The partial reduction of Wis1
activity by win1-1 in cdc25-22 wee1-50 win1-1
cells appears to offer suitable conditions for selection of
suppressors. Another advantage of screening for regulators of Cdc25 in
a wee1 mutant background over a simple screen with the
cdc25-22 single mutant is that the former approach should avoid isolation of suppressors such as nim1+,
which suppress the cdc25-22 defect by an indirect mechanism. For these reasons, this genetic screen might contribute to our understanding of the complex regulation of Cdc25 phosphatase activity (Kumagai and Dunphy, 1992
; Kovelman and Russell, 1996
; Furnari et al., 1997
; Peng et al., 1997
). It is likely
(although not proven) that Wis2 and Wis3 act on Cdc25 or one of its
regulators, and further characterization of these proteins should be
highly informative. With regard to the wis1 pathway, a more
exhaustive screen for multicopy suppressors of the triple mutant might
identify the putative cell cycle effector(s) of Spc1, in addition to
the activators of Spc1 such as Wis1 and Wis4 that have been isolated to
date.
| |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
We thank Nicola Preston and Vicky Clark for DNA sequencing, Maria Victoria Zarate for help at the very early stage of cloning of tps19+ gene, Elmer Maier and Mitsuhiro Yanagida for information on S. pombe ordered cosmid/P1 phage libraries, and Steve Sedgwick for a gift of a transposon kit. Many thanks go to Joan Davidson and Aileen Greig for technical assistance and Yasuhisa Adachi, Bill Earnshaw, and Colin Gordon for generous encouragement. This work was supported by grants from the Wellcome Trust, Cancer Research Campain (to P.A.F.), and the Daiwa Anglo-Japanese Foundation (to I.S.). I.S. was a recipient of a Travelling Research Fellowship from the Wellcome Trust.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* Corresponding authors. E-mail addresses: itaru{at}hgu.mrc.ac.uk (I.S.), p.fantes{at}ed.ac.uk (P.A.F.).
Present address: Department of Biochemistry,
University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH8 9XD, United Kingdom.
Present address: Department of Biochemistry,
University of Dundee, Dundee DD1 4HN, United Kingdom.
§ Present address: Department of Molecular Microbiology andBiotechnology, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv 69978, Israel.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
V. Martin, M. A. Rodriguez-Gabriel, W. H. McDonald, S. Watt, J. R. Yates III, J. Bahler, and P. Russell Cip1 and Cip2 Are Novel RNA-Recognition-Motif Proteins That Counteract Csx1 Function during Oxidative Stress Mol. Biol. Cell, March 1, 2006; 17(3): 1176 - 1183. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L.-y. Wang, K. Shimada, M. Morishita, and K. Shiozaki Response of Fission Yeast to Toxic Cations Involves Cooperative Action of the Stress-Activated Protein Kinase Spc1/Sty1 and the Hal4 Protein Kinase Mol. Cell. Biol., May 15, 2005; 25(10): 3945 - 3955. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Bimbo, Y. Jia, S. L. Poh, R. K. M. Karuturi, N. den Elzen, X. Peng, L. Zheng, M. O'Connell, E. T. Liu, M. K. Balasubramanian, et al. Systematic Deletion Analysis of Fission Yeast Protein Kinases Eukaryot. Cell, April 1, 2005; 4(4): 799 - 813. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. T. Jeong, F. Ozoe, K. Tanaka, T. Nakagawa, H. Matsuda, and M. Kawamukai A Novel Gene, msa1, Inhibits Sexual Differentiation in Schizosaccharomyces pombe Genetics, May 1, 2004; 167(1): 77 - 91. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. S. Moye-Rowley Regulation of the Transcriptional Response to Oxidative Stress in Fungi: Similarities and Differences Eukaryot. Cell, June 1, 2003; 2(3): 381 - 389. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. A. Smith, W. M. Toone, D. Chen, J. Bahler, N. Jones, B. A. Morgan, and J. Quinn The Srk1 Protein Kinase Is a Target for the Sty1 Stress-activated MAPK in Fission Yeast J. Biol. Chem., August 30, 2002; 277(36): 33411 - 33421. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. N. Nguyen, A. D. Ikner, M. Shiozaki, S. M. Warren, and K. Shiozaki Cytoplasmic Localization of Wis1 MAPKK by Nuclear Export Signal Is Important for Nuclear Targeting of Spc1/Sty1 MAPK in Fission Yeast Mol. Biol. Cell, August 1, 2002; 13(8): 2651 - 2663. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Hohmann Osmotic Stress Signaling and Osmoadaptation in Yeasts Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev., June 1, 2002; 66(2): 300 - 372. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Sanchez-Piris, F. Posas, V. Alemany, I. Winge, E. Hidalgo, O. Bachs, and R. Aligue The Serine/Threonine Kinase Cmk2 Is Required for Oxidative Stress Response in Fission Yeast J. Biol. Chem., May 10, 2002; 277(20): 17722 - 17727. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. J. Jang, M. Jwa, J.-H. Kim, and K. Song Selective Inhibition of MAPKK Wis1 in the Stress-activated MAPK Cascade of Schizosaccharomyces pombe by Novel Berberine Derivatives J. Biol. Chem., March 29, 2002; 277(14): 12388 - 12395. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Quinn, V. J. Findlay, K. Dawson, J. B.A. Millar, N. Jones, B. A. Morgan, and W. M. Toone Distinct Regulatory Proteins Control the Graded Transcriptional Response to Increasing H2O2 Levels in Fission Yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe Mol. Biol. Cell, March 1, 2002; 13(3): 805 - 816. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. L. Santos and K. Shiozaki Fungal Histidine Kinases Sci. Signal., September 4, 2001; 2001(98): re1 - re1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. T. K. Janoo, L. |