Molecular Biology of the Cell Call for Nominations: MBC Editor-in-Chief

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract
Right arrow Full Text
Services
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Interactions between CLIP-170, Tubulin, and Microtubules: Implications for the Mechanism of CLIP-170 Plus-End Tracking Behavior
Mol. Biol. Cell Folker et al. 16: 5373

Supplemental Material

Figure 1: Movies of GFP-CLIP-170 and GFP-H1 microtubule plus-end tracking behavior in vivo. Adherent cultures of Cos7 cells were grown on glass coverslips, transiently transfected with plasmids expressing the indicated CLIP- 170 constructs, and visualized 24-30 hours after transfection. Coverslips were inverted onto slides, sealed with VALAP, and imaged by taking streaming video at 0.2 second intervals on a Cascade 512B CCD camera driven by MetaMorph software (60x 1.4NA objective, 1.3x optivar).

Figure 2: Fitting of cosedimentation data to a quadratic binding curve To demonstrate that calculating [free tubulin] from [bound CLIP-170] does not introduce significant artifacts, the binding of H1 to Taxol microtubules was fit to a quadratic binding curve CT/C0=[(Kd+T0+C0)-[ (Kd+T0+C0)2-4C0T0]1/2]/2C0 Where CT is the CLIP-170:tubulin complex; C0 is concentration of CLIP-170 added; and T0 is the concentration of polymerized tubulin added.

This article contains the following supporting material:





This Article
Right arrow Abstract
Right arrow Full Text
Services
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow reprints & permissions


Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Copyright © 2008 by The American Society for Cell Biology. Terms of copyright protection, warranties, and disclaimers.