![[Feedback]](/icons/banner/feedbackACT.gif){kind=icon}
![[For Subscribers]](/icons/banner/subscriberACT.gif){kind=icon}
![[Archive]](/icons/banner/archiveACT.gif){kind=icon}
![[Search]](/icons/banner/searchACT.gif){kind=icon}
|
|
|
|
|
||
A more recent version of this article appeared on December 1, 2002
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Submitted on May 2, 2002
Revised on July 9, 2002
Accepted on August 23, 2002
1 Department of Molecular Biology, MB7, The Scripps Research Institute, 10550 North Torrey Pines Road, La Jolla, California, 92037 (present address: Department of Genetics, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge, CB2 3EH, UK)
2 Department of Biology, CB3280, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, 27599
3 Department of Molecular Biology, MB7, The Scripps Research Institute, 10550 North Torrey Pines Road, La Jolla, California, 92037
* Corresponding author. E-mail address: sreed{at}scripps.edu.
Spindle orientation is critical for accurate chromosomal segregation in eukaryotic cells. In the yeast S. cerevisiae, orientation of the mitotic spindle is achieved by a program of microtubule-cortex interactions coupled to spindle morphogenesis. We previously implicated Bud6p in directing microtubule capture throughout this program. Here we have analyzed cells coexpressing GFP:Bud6 and GFP:Tub1 fusions, providing a kinetic view of Bud6p-microtubule interactions in live cells. Surprisingly, even during the G1 phase, microtubule capture at the recent division site and the incipient bud is dictated by Bud6p. These contacts are eliminated in bud6
cells but are proficient in kar9 cells. Thus, Bud6p cues microtubule capture, as soon as a new cell polarity axis is established independent of Kar9p. Bud6p increases the duration of interactions and promotes distinct modes of cortical association within the bud and neck regions. In particular, microtubule shrinkage and growth at the cortex rarely occur away from Bud6p sites. These are the interactions selectively impaired at the bud cortex in bud6 cells. Finally, interactions away from Bud6p sites within the bud differ from those occurring at the mother cell cortex, pointing to the existence of an independent factor controlling cortical contacts in mother cells following bud emergence.
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  N. Delgehyr, C. S. J. Lopes, C. A. Moir, S. M. Huisman, and M. Segal Dissecting the involvement of formins in Bud6p-mediated cortical capture of microtubules in S. cerevisiae J. Cell Sci., November 15, 2008; 121(22): 3803 - 3814. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 B. K. Haarer, A. H. Helfant, S. A. Nelson, J. A. Cooper, and D. C. Amberg Stable Preanaphase Spindle Positioning Requires Bud6p and an Apparent Interaction between the Spindle Pole Bodies and the Neck Eukaryot. Cell, May 1, 2007; 6(5): 797 - 807. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. B. Moseley and B. L. Goode The Yeast Actin Cytoskeleton: from Cellular Function to Biochemical Mechanism Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev., September 1, 2006; 70(3): 605 - 645. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. Veith, N. Scherr, V. P. Efimov, and R. Fischer Role of the spindle-pole-body protein ApsB and the cortex protein ApsA in microtubule organization and nuclear migration in Aspergillus nidulans J. Cell Sci., August 15, 2005; 118(16): 3705 - 3716. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. M. Huisman and M. Segal Cortical capture of microtubules and spindle polarity in budding yeast - where's the catch? J. Cell Sci., February 1, 2005; 118(3): 463 - 471. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S. M. Huisman, O. A.M. Bales, M. Bertrand, M. F.M.A. Smeets, S. I. Reed, and M. Segal Differential contribution of Bud6p and Kar9p to microtubule capture and spindle orientation in S. cerevisiae J. Cell Biol., October 25, 2004; 167(2): 231 - 244. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 H. Maekawa and E. Schiebel Cdk1-Clb4 controls the interaction of astral microtubule plus ends with subdomains of the daughter cell cortex Genes & Dev., July 15, 2004; 18(14): 1709 - 1724. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. N. Molk, S. C. Schuyler, J. Y. Liu, J. G. Evans, E. D. Salmon, D. Pellman, and K. Bloom The Differential Roles of Budding Yeast Tem1p, Cdc15p, and Bub2p Protein Dynamics in Mitotic Exit Mol. Biol. Cell, April 1, 2004; 15(4): 1519 - 1532. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. B. Moseley, I. Sagot, A. L. Manning, Y. Xu, M. J. Eck, D. Pellman, and B. L. Goode A Conserved Mechanism for Bni1- and mDia1-induced Actin Assembly and Dual Regulation of Bni1 by Bud6 and Profilin Mol. Biol. Cell, February 1, 2004; 15(2): 896 - 907. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
